C. S. Lewis on the Problem of Divine Hiddenness
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Liar, Lunatic, and Lord Compiled from Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis
WHO DO YOU SAY THAT I AM? C.S. Lewis' Lord, Liar, or Lunatic? ––compiled from Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis said this: “Let us not say, ‘I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept his claim to be God.’ That is one thing we must not say. "A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic--on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg-- or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great moral teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to.” I. The Question: Who was (is) Jesus? The Main Argument: AThere are only 3 possible answers A Lord, or Liar, or Lunatic. The bottom line of the argument is this: Jesus was either a liar, a lunatic, or the Lord. He could not possibly be a liar or a lunatic. Therefore “Jesus is Lord.” II. Argument #1- The Dilemma: Lord or liar: Jesus was either God (if he did not lie about who he was) or a bad man (if he did). -
Surrounded! “C. S. LEWIS: SURPRISED by JOY!”
June 21, 2015 Surrounded! “C. S. LEWIS: SURPRISED BY JOY!” Rev. Gary Haller First United Methodist Church Birmingham, Michigan John 16:19-22 Jesus knew that they wanted to ask him, so he said to them, “Are you discussing among yourselves what I meant when I said, ‘A little while, and you will no longer see me, and again a little while, and you will see me’? Very truly, I tell you, you will weep and mourn, but the world will rejoice; you will have pain, but your pain will turn into joy. When a woman is in labor, she has pain, because her hour has come. But when her child is born, she no longer remembers the anguish because of the joy of having brought a human being into the world. So you have pain now; but I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you.” Matthew 13:44 “The kingdom of heaven is like treasure hidden in a field, which someone found and hid; then in his joy he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field.” “Once there were four children whose names were Peter, Susan, Edmund and Lucy. This story is about something that happened to them when they were sent away from London during the war because of the air-raids. They were sent to the house of an old Professor who lived in the heart of the country, ten miles from the nearest railway station and two miles from the nearest post office.” Peter, Susan, Edmund and Lucy soon realize that they have a lot of freedom due to the lack of supervision and decide to play a game of hide and seek in the house. -
The Political-Economy Trilemma
DPRIETI Discussion Paper Series 20-E-018 The Political-Economy Trilemma AIZENMAN, Joshua University of Southern California and NBER ITO, Hiroyuki RIETI The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/ RIETI Discussion Paper Series 20-E-018 March 2020 The Political-Economy Trilemma1 Joshua Aizenman University of Southern California and NBER Hiro Ito Portland State University Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry Abstract This paper investigates the political-economy trilemma: policy makers face a trade-off of choosing two out of three policy goals or governance styles, namely, (hyper-)globalization, national sovereignty, and democracy. We develop a set of indexes that measure the extent of attainment of the three factors for 139 countries in the period of 1975-2016. Using these indexes, we examine the validity of the hypothesis of the political-economy trilemma by testing whether the three trilemma variables are linearly related. We find that, for industrialized countries, there is a linear relationship between globalization and national sovereignty (i.e., a dilemma), and that for developing countries, all three indexes are linearly correlated (i.e., a trilemma). We also investigate whether and how three political-economic factors affect the degree of political and financial stability. The results indicate that more democratic industrialized countries tend to experience more political instability, while developing countries tend to be able to stabilize their politics if they are more democratic. The lower level of national sovereignty an industrialized country attains, the more stable its political situation tends to be, while a higher level of sovereignty helps a developing country to stabilize its politics. -
New Measures of the Trilemma Hypothesis: Implications for Asia
ADBI Working Paper Series New Measures of the Trilemma Hypothesis: Implications for Asia Hiro Ito and Masahiro Kawai No. 381 September 2012 Asian Development Bank Institute Hiro Ito is associate professor of economics at the Department of Economics, Portland State University. Masahiro Kawai is Dean and CEO, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. This is a revised version of the paper presented to the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Annual Conference held in Tokyo on 2 December 2011. The authors thank Akira Kohsaka, Guonan Ma, and other conference participants as well as Giovanni Capannelli, Mario B. Lamberte, Eduardo Levy-Yeyati, Peter Morgan, Naoto Osawa, Gloria O. Pasadilla, Reza Siregar, and Willem Thorbecke for useful comments on earlier versions. Michael Cui, Jacinta Bernadette Rico, Erica Clower, and Shigeru Akiyama provided excellent research assistance. The first author thanks Portland State University for financial support and ADBI for its hospitality while he was visiting the institute. The authors accept responsibility for any remaining errors in the paper. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. -
Critical Analysis of Views on God's
5th International Conference on Research in Behavioral and Social Science Spain | Barcelona | December 7-9, 2018 Beyond the Barriers of Nature: Critical analysis of views on God’s Existence in various religions R. Rafique, N. Abas Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Gujrat, Hafiz Hayat Campus, Gujrat Abstract: This article reports critical overview of views on existence of God and naturalism. Theists argue the existence of God, atheists insist nonexistence of God, while agnostics claim the existence of God is unknowable, and even if exists, it is neither possible to demonstrate His existence nor likely to refute this spiritual theology. The argument that the existence of God can be known to all, even before exposure to any divine revelation, predates before Islam, Christianity and even Judaism. Pharos deity claim shows that the concept of deity existed long before major religions. History shows the Greek philosophers also tried to explore God before, during and after the prophet’s revolution in Mesopotamia. Today presupposition apologetical doctrine (Abram Kuyper) ponders and defends the existence of God. They conclude the necessary condition of belief to be exposed to revelation that atheists deny calling transcendental necessity. Human experience and action is proof of God’s existence as His existence is the necessary condition of human being’s intelligibility. The spirituality exists in all human sub-consciousness and sometimes, reveals to consciousness of some individuals. Human being’s inability to conceive the cosmos shows that there exist more types of creatures in different parts of universe. Enlightened men’s capability to resurrect corpse proves soul’s immortality. -
C.S. Lewis's Trilemma Seen Through Muslim Eyes
C.S. LEWIS’S TRILEMMA SEEN THROUGH MUSLIM EYES Christian TĂMAȘ Independent Scholar Abstract Beyond his apologetic works about Jesus Christ and the Christian faith, C.S. Lewis polarized the religious and non-religious world with his famous Trilemma expressing his opinion on the nature and identity of Christ. While for the Christians and atheists C.S. Lewis's Trilemma is still a matter of rather harsh debate, for the Muslims it represents a matter of lesser importance. Some of those acquainted with C.S. Lewis's ideas approached it with caution taking into account the Qur’anic statements about the revelations previously “descended” upon man, which generally prevent the Muslims from commenting or interpreting the other monotheistic scriptures. Thus, many Muslim scholars consider C.S. Lewis's Trilemma a Christian affair not of their concern, while others object to its content considered incompatible with the Islamic views concerning the person of Jesus Christ. Keywords: C.S. Lewis, trilemma, Jesus Christ, Islamic Tradition, Qur’an Introduction Considered one of the most influential Christian authors of the past century, C.S. Lewis built a personal theological system starting from the premise that there is a natural law which human beings – necessarily submitted to its influences— must unconditionally accept. Thus, in his opinion, God must exist in His Trinitarian nature as Father, Son and Holy Spirit where the relationship between the Father and Son is the source of divine Love which acts through the Holy Spirit. As a conservative apologist, C.S. Lewis made of the person and the nature of Jesus Christ the central themes of his life and work. -
Ryan Hudson Honors Thesis-May 2021
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
Myth in CS Lewis's Perelandra
Walls 1 A Hierarchy of Love: Myth in C.S. Lewis’s Perelandra A Thesis Submitted to The Faculty of the School of Communication In Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in English by Joseph Robert Walls May 2012 Walls 2 Liberty University School of Communication Master of Arts in English _______________________________________________________________________ Thesis Chair Date Dr. Branson Woodard, D.A. _______________________________________________________________________ First Reader Date Dr. Carl Curtis, Ph.D. _______________________________________________________________________ Second Reader Date Dr. Mary Elizabeth Davis, Ph.D. Walls 3 For Alyson Your continual encouragement, support, and empathy are invaluable to me. Walls 4 Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................5 Chapter 1: Understanding Symbol, Myth, and Allegory in Perelandra........................................11 Chapter 2: Myth and Sacramentalism Through Character ............................................................32 Chapter 3: On Depictions of Evil...................................................................................................59 Chapter 4: Mythical Interaction with Landscape...........................................................................74 A Conclusion Transposed..............................................................................................................91 Works Cited ...................................................................................................................................94 -
Joy Davidman Lewis: Author, Editor and Collaborator
Volume 22 Number 2 Article 3 1998 Joy Davidman Lewis: Author, Editor and Collaborator Diana Pavlac Glyer Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Glyer, Diana Pavlac (1998) "Joy Davidman Lewis: Author, Editor and Collaborator," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 22 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol22/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Biography of Joy Davidman Lewis and her influence on C.S. Lewis. Additional Keywords Davidman, Joy—Biography; Davidman, Joy—Criticism and interpretation; Davidman, Joy—Influence on C.S. Lewis; Davidman, Joy—Religion; Davidman, Joy. Smoke on the Mountain; Lewis, C.S.—Influence of Joy Davidman (Lewis); Lewis, C.S. -
Edmund Pevensie As an Example of Lewis's 'New Kind of Man'
Inklings Forever: Published Colloquium Proceedings 1997-2016 Volume 6 A Collection of Essays Presented at the Sixth Frances White Ewbank Colloquium on Article 12 C.S. Lewis & Friends 5-29-2008 A Redeemed Life: Edmund Pevensie as an Example of Lewis's 'new kind of man' Pamela L. Jordan Taylor University Follow this and additional works at: https://pillars.taylor.edu/inklings_forever Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Jordan, Pamela L. (2008) "A Redeemed Life: Edmund Pevensie as an Example of Lewis's 'new kind of man'," Inklings Forever: Published Colloquium Proceedings 1997-2016: Vol. 6 , Article 12. Available at: https://pillars.taylor.edu/inklings_forever/vol6/iss1/12 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for the Study of C.S. Lewis & Friends at Pillars at Taylor University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inklings Forever: Published Colloquium Proceedings 1997-2016 by an authorized editor of Pillars at Taylor University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Redeemed Life: Edmund Pevensie as an Example of Lewis's 'new kind of man' Pamela L. Jordan A recurring theme in The Chronicles of excitement and eagerness to explore, likening their Narnia is that Narnia changes those who enter. The new adventure to being shipwrecked (he had read all narrator repeatedly notes the restorative power of the right books). Just as the debate about eating the Narnia and calls the reader's attention to the sandwiches brings tempers to a boil, Edmund is able difference in the children (and adults in The to diffuse the situation with his adventuresome spirit. -
Liebesman & Magidor 2017
A response to Liebesman and Magidor on copredication Matthew Gotham University of Oxford 11th Semantics and Philosophy in Europe Colloquium, University of Warsaw, 22 September 2019 1/45 Outline Introduction Theories to introduce Gotham 2014, 2017 Liebesman & Magidor 2017, 2019 Critique of L&M’s theory… …And a concession Conclusion 2/45 Introduction Copredication: the phenomenon (1) Nobody understood the lecture, which lasted an hour. (2) Lunch was delicious but took forever. (Asher 2011: 11) (3) The bank was vandalized after calling in Bob’s debt. (4) London is so unhappy, ugly and polluted that it should be destroyed and rebuilt 100 miles away. (Chomsky 2000: 37). 3/45 Characterization • Using two (or more) senses of a polysemous word ‘at the same time’, e.g. a single instance of lecture to mean information and event, bank to mean institution and building, etc. • Predicates with apparently conflicting requirements applied to the same argument (felicitously), e.g. delicious requiring its argument to denote food while took forever requiring its argument to denote an event, etc. We’ll work with elements of both characterizations. 4/45 Issues • Philosophical What (if anything) is the referent of nouns supporting copredication (NSCs) like lecture, lunch and bank? • Compositional How can a treatment of copredication square with an account of semantic (in)felicity? • Individuation and counting 5/45 Issues of counting and individuation Suppose the library has two copies of Tolstoy’s War and Peace, Peter takes out one, and John the other. Did Peter and John take out the same book, or different books? If we attend to the material factor of the lexi- cal item, they took out different books; if we focus on its abstract component, they took out the same book. -
Canberra Christian Fellowship (In the Methodist Tradition)
September 2020 Issue 135 Canberra Christian Fellowship (in the Methodist Tradition) Canberra CCF & CAC services resumption Aboriginal Church are currently uncertain. C. S. Lewis (1898 - 1963) Well known in Christian circles, Clive Staples Lewis is also widely known by the general public principally from his Chronicles of Narnia books which have been translated into 47 languages and been adapted for plays, radio, television and the big screen. To family and friends he was known as Jack. Born in Belfast, Northern Ireland, Lewis's mother died when he was 9. His early education came from a mixture of private tutors and periods at various schools. In his early teen years, he abandoned the Church of Ireland Christian faith in which he had been brought up to become an athiest. Entering Oxford University in 1917, he was soon drafted for army training and on his 19th birthday arrived at the Somme Valley, France and entered the trenches to fight in the First World War. Wounded 4 1/2 months later, Lewis recovered back in England and was demobilised at the end of 1918. He successfully returned to his studies and in 1925 "was elected a Fellow and Tutor in English Literature at Magdalen College" Oxford University. Lewis and an army cadet friend, Paddy Moore, "made a mutual pact that if either died during the war, the survivor would take care of both of their families. Paddy was killed in action in 1918 and Lewis kept his promise." He became very close to Moore's mother, often referring to her as his mother, and caring for her until her death.