DOCSLIB.ORG

Rosebud Agency (See Also Whetstone Agency, Spotted Tail Agency, and Upper Platte Agency)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rosebud Agency (See Also Whetstone Agency, Spotted Tail Agency, and Upper Platte Agency) Rosebud Agency (see also Whetstone Agency, Spotted Tail Agency, and Upper Platte Agency) Originally known as the Upper Platte Agency, it was renamed Whetstone Agency in 1869, then Spotted Tail Agency in 1874, before finally acquiring the name Rosebud in 1878. The Agency served the Sicangu Lakota people led by Spotted Tail as well as members of the Sans Arcs, Oglala, Hunkpapa and Miniconjou bands. Whetstone Agency was located on the Missouri River where the free-flowing whiskey trade caused Spotted Tail to insist upon relocating the Agency away from accessible river traffic. The Agency first located on the White River near the Nebraska-Dakota border, then moved to Beaver Creek in northwestern Nebraska. A year later, it was moved to the site of the old Ponca Agency on the Missouri River above Yankton. It finally located on Rosebud Creek, in 1878, near its junction with the south fork of the White River. Chief Milk (an Oglala) and his band were the first to settle on the Rosebud, making their home north of Bonesteel. Swift Bear followed and eventually settled south of Burke on Ponca Creek. Later Medicine Bull settled south of the White River; Good Voice established his band at Oak Creek; Quick Bear, Red Fish, and Red Leaf located in the Norris area, with Red Leaf later moving north of Burke. Other prominent headmen at Rosebud were He Dog, Two Strike, Hollow Horn Bear, Ring Thunder, Stranger Horse, and Yellow Hair. Today the Rosebud Reservation is situated north of the Nebraska border in central South Dakota in Todd County. It has a land base of 882,416 acres. U. S. Congressman Ben Reifel and nationally renowned opera singer, White Eagle, were Rosebud tribal members. Records, 1847-1936. This microfilm publication consists of Rosebud Agency records held by the National Archives facility in Kansas City, Missouri. The records were originally filmed as part of a regional archives microfilm project (6NC-77-2) in 1977. Copies of the microfilm were purchased by the SD State Archives for the Indian Archives Project. CONTENTS NARA ROLL # MF LOCATION Census, 1877-1891 13 3671 Marriages, 1880-1881 Census, 1892-1893 15 3672 Indians in Wild West Shows, 1894 District and Camp Censuses, 1895-1905 22 3673 District and Camp Censuses, 1895-1908 23 3674 Black Pipe District, 1913-1919 Reservation, 1920 Ration Books, 1892-1896 25 3675 Ration Books, 1897-1902 26 3676 Rosebud Agency - 1 CONTENTS NARA ROLL # MF LOCATION Ration Books, 1903-1904, 1906 27 3677 Alphabetical List of Indian Names Birth and Death Reports, 1901-1946 Birth and Death Reports, 1900-1910 28 3678 Index to Inherited Interests, 1916-1917 29 3679 Case No. 1-5745 30 3680 Case No. 5748-41066 31 3681 Heirship Hearing Notices, 1914-1919 Register of Indian Families, ca 1894-1902 32 3682 Marriage Records, 1847-1878, 1906-1917 Rosebud School Census, 1915-1916, 1918-1919, 1926 33 3683 Ponca Reservation School Census, 1927-28, 1930-32 Santee Reservation School Census, 1927-28, 1931-32 Yankton Reservation School Census, 1927-1928, 34 3684 1930-1931 Family Enrollment Report, 1929 Genealogy (Decimal Code 053) Military Records (Decimal Code 601) Employees – Tribal Roll – Degree of Indian Blood (Decimal Code 063.0) Maps and Charts (Decimal Code 014) Annuity Payrolls, 1913-1914 35 3685 Allotment Records, 1889-1936 This series consists of allotment books. The records, submitted on standard form 5-367a, provide information on allotted Indian land on the Rosebud Indian Reservation. The information provided on each form includes the allottee's name; the allotment number; the individual Indian money account number; the allottee's date of birth, sex, and date of death; the legal description and acreage of the allotted land; and information on improvements, issuance of fee or trust patents, and rental value. Each form includes the probate number and date, and a list of the allottee's heirs, providing information on their names, individual Indian money account numbers, dates of birth, shares in the estate, and relationships to the decedent. Each form includes a list of leases associated with the allotment, providing information on the lessees' names, the lease numbers and types (e.g., agriculture, petroleum, gas), the dates of approval and expiration, and the annual rental amounts. Rosebud Agency - 2 The records also include a schedule of lieu allotments issued on September 12, 1908, submitted on standard form 5-193. The information in each entry includes the allotment number; the legal description of the land to be issued in lieu of the original allotment; the allottee's name; the legal description of the land to be relinquished; and the reason for relinquishment (e.g., rough, sandy, hilly, poor soil, cut by a creek). The schedule includes a certification that the lieu allotments were issued correctly, signed by the Rosebud Agency superintendent and the special allotting agent. Index to Allotment Books Allotment Books, 1 - 500 Allotment Books, 501-1399 36 3686 Allotment Books, 1400-2195 37 3687 Allotment Books, 2196-3000 38 3688 Allotment Books, 3001-4000 ½ 39 3689 Allotment Books, 4001-5000 40 3690 Allotment Books, 5001-6000 41 3691 Allotment Books, 6001-7000 42 3692 Allotment Books, 7001-7908, 1901 43 3693 Allotment Books, n.d. 44 3694 Allotment Revisions Grazing Land Allotments Indian Census Rolls, 1886-1943 (M595). Because Indians on reservations were not citizens until 1974, nineteenth and early twentieth century census takers did not count Indians for congressional representation. Instead, the U.S. government took special censuses in connection with Indian treaties, the last of which was in 1871. The result of many treaties was to extinguish Indian ties to land. Typically, the Indians agreed to reduce their landholdings or to move to an area less desired for white settlement. Some treaties provided for the dissolution of the tribes and the allotment of land to individual Indians. The censuses determined who was eligible for the allotments. These census rolls were usually submitted each year by agents or superintendents in charge of Indian reservations, as required by an act of July 4, 1884. The data on the rolls vary to some extent, but usually given are the English and/or Indian name of the person, roll number, age or date of birth, sex, and relationship to head of family. Beginning in 1930, the rolls also show the degree of Indian blood, marital status, ward status, place of residence, and sometimes other information. For certain years – including 1935, 1936, 1938, and 1939 – only supplemental rolls of additions and deletions were compiled. Most of the 1940 rolls have been retained by the Bureau of Indian affairs and are not included in this publication. Rosebud Agency - 3 CONTENTS NARA ROLL # MF LOCATION Rosebud (Brule and Other Bands of Sioux Indians), 427 9670 1886 (totals only), 1887, 1891 Rosebud (Brule Sioux Indians), 1892, 1895-1905 428-430 9671 Rosebud (Sioux Indians), 1906-1907, 1909-1912, 431-434 9672 1915-1920 Rosebud (Sioux Indians), 1921-1926 435-437 9673 Rosebud (Sioux Indians), 1927-1930 438-440 9674 Rosebud (Sioux Indians), 1931 (with birth and death 441-442 9675 rolls, 1924-1931), 1932 Rosebud (Sioux Indians), 1933 443 9676 Rosebud (Rosebud and Yankton Sioux Indians), 1934- 444 9677 1935 Rosebud (Rosebud and Yankton Sioux Indians), 1936- 445 9678 1939, 1942-1943 Correspondence with Agency Farmers, 1899-1931. These records are housed at the National Archives facility in Kansas City, Missouri and were microfilmed at the request of the SD State Archives for the Indian Archives Project. The correspondence is arranged in three separate systems: chronologically by year, 1912-1929; alphabetically, 1914-1931; and alphabetically by district, 1899-1924 and represents three separate series of Rosebud Agency records at the National Archives. Chronological Correspondence with Farmers, 1912-1929. These are primarily letters received from and copies of letters sent to the district farmers. In most cases the correspondent is the superintendent, but there are letters to or from the day school inspector, teachers, local merchants, or other agency employees. Occasionally there are copies of letters from and to persons other than the farmer. The correspondence chiefly concerns the farmers' supervision of school attendance and truancy, the use of school land and property, student health, the transfer of students to other reservation districts, school staffing, vacations, allotments, rations, construction of buildings, equipment, supplies, and the distribution of annuity payments. Alphabetical Correspondence with Farmers, 1914-1931. This series consists chiefly of letters received and copies of letters sent by farmers in the Black Pipe District. Correspondents are the agency superintendent, other agencies, agency employees, private citizens, and businesses. The subjects covered include the farmer's responsibilities as, in effect, a subagent: such matters as allotment leases, work for Indians, students, applications for prorata shares of tribal funds, purchases by Indians using trust funds, and other matters which came up in the day-to-day operation of the district. Rosebud Agency - 4 Alphabetical Correspondence with Farmers by District, 1899-1924. The series consists of correspondence from and to the farmer in charge of the district. His correspondents include additional farmers, the agency superintendent, the supervisor in charge, and other agency employees. Subjects include monthly subsistence checks, leases and lease payments, allotments, heirship, school attendance, cattle brands, supplies,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plains Indians
    Your Name Keyboarding II xx Period Mr. Behling Current Date Plains Indians The American Plains Indians are among the best known of all Native Americans. These Indians played a significant role in shaping the history of the West. Some of the more noteworthy Plains Indians were Big Foot, Black Kettle, Crazy Horse, Red Cloud, Sitting Bull, and Spotted Tail. Big Foot Big Foot (?1825-1890) was also known as Spotted Elk. Born in the northern Great Plains, he eventually became a Minneconjou Teton Sioux chief. He was part of a tribal delegation that traveled to Washington, D. C., and worked to establish schools throughout the Sioux Territory. He was one of those massacred at Wounded Knee in December 1890 (Bowman, 1995, 63). Black Kettle Black Kettle (?1803-1868) was born near the Black Hills in present-day South Dakota. He was recognized as a Southern Cheyenne peace chief for his efforts to bring peace to the region. However, his attempts at accommodation were not successful, and his band was massacred at Sand Creek in 1864. Even though he continued to seek peace, he was killed with the remainder of his tribe in the Washita Valley of Oklahoma in 1868 (Bowman, 1995, 67). Crazy Horse Crazy Horse (?1842-1877) was also born near the Black Hills. His father was a medicine man; his mother was the sister of Spotted Tail. He was recognized as a skilled hunter and fighter. Crazy Horse believed he was immune from battle injury and took part in all the major Sioux battles to protect the Black Hills against white intrusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher’S Guide Teacher’S Guide Little Bighorn National Monument
    LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT TEACHER’S GUIDE TEACHER’S GUIDE LITTLE BIGHORN NATIONAL MONUMENT INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Teacher’s Guide is to provide teachers grades K-12 information and activities concerning Plains Indian Life-ways, the events surrounding the Battle of the Little Bighorn, the Personalities involved and the Impact of the Battle. The information provided can be modified to fit most ages. Unit One: PERSONALITIES Unit Two: PLAINS INDIAN LIFE-WAYS Unit Three: CLASH OF CULTURES Unit Four: THE CAMPAIGN OF 1876 Unit Five: BATTLE OF THE LITTLE BIGHORN Unit Six: IMPACT OF THE BATTLE In 1879 the land where The Battle of the Little Bighorn occurred was designated Custer Battlefield National Cemetery in order to protect the bodies of the men buried on the field of battle. With this designation, the land fell under the control of the United States War Department. It would remain under their control until 1940, when the land was turned over to the National Park Service. Custer Battlefield National Monument was established by Congress in 1946. The name was changed to Little Bighorn National Monument in 1991. This area was once the homeland of the Crow Indians who by the 1870s had been displaced by the Lakota and Cheyenne. The park consists of 765 acres on the east boundary of the Little Bighorn River: the larger north- ern section is known as Custer Battlefield, the smaller Reno-Benteen Battlefield is located on the bluffs over-looking the river five miles to the south. The park lies within the Crow Indian Reservation in southeastern Montana, one mile east of I-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Afraid of Bear to Zuni: Surnames in English of Native American Origin Found Within
    RAYNOR MEMORIAL LIBRARIES Indian origin names, were eventually shortened to one-word names, making a few indistinguishable from names of non-Indian origin. Name Categories: Personal and family names of Indian origin contrast markedly with names of non-Indian Afraid of Bear to Zuni: Surnames in origin. English of Native American Origin 1. Personal and family names from found within Marquette University Christian saints (e.g. Juan, Johnson): Archival Collections natives- rare; non-natives- common 2. Family names from jobs (e.g. Oftentimes names of Native Miller): natives- rare; non-natives- American origin are based on objects common with descriptive adjectives. The 3. Family names from places (e.g. following list, which is not Rivera): natives- rare; non-native- comprehensive, comprises common approximately 1,000 name variations in 4. Personal and family names from English found within the Marquette achievements, attributes, or incidents University archival collections. The relating to the person or an ancestor names originate from over 50 tribes (e.g. Shot with two arrows): natives- based in 15 states and Canada. Tribal yes; non-natives- yes affiliations and place of residence are 5. Personal and family names from noted. their clan or totem (e.g. White bear): natives- yes; non-natives- no History: In ancient times it was 6. Personal or family names from customary for children to be named at dreams and visions of the person or birth with a name relating to an animal an ancestor (e.g. Black elk): natives- or physical phenominon. Later males in yes; non-natives- no particular received names noting personal achievements, special Tribes/ Ethnic Groups: Names encounters, inspirations from dreams, or are expressed according to the following physical handicaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: a Lakota Story Cycle Paul A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 2008 Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle" (2008). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 51. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/51 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Fiction I Historical History I Native Ameri("an Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle is a narrative history of the Pine Ridge Lakota tribe of South Dakota, following its history from 1850 to the present day through actual historical events and through the stories of four fictional Lakota children, each related by descent and separated from one another by two generations. The ecology of the Pine Ridge region, especially its mammalian and avian wildlife, is woven into the stories of the children. 111ustrated by the author, the book includes drawings of Pine Ridge wildlife, regional maps, and Native American pictorial art. Appendices include a listing of important Lakota words, and checklists of mammals and breeding birds of the region. Dr. Paul A. Johnsgard is foundation professor of biological sciences emeritus of the University of Nebraska-lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Native Americans Volume 3
    OUR NATIVE AMERICANS VOLUME 3 WHERE AND HOW TO FIND THEM by E. KAY KIRKHAM GENEALOGIST All rights reserved Stevenson's Genealogy Center 230 West 1230 North Provo, Utah 84604 1985 Donated in Memory of Frieda McNeil 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .......................................... ii Chapter 1. Instructions on how to use this book ............ 1 How do I get started? ..................... 2 How to use the pedigree form ............... 3 How to use a library and its records .......... 3 Two ways to get help ...................... 3 How to take notes for your family record ....... 4 Where do we go from here? ................ 5 Techniques in searching .................... 5 Workshop techniques ..................... 5 Chapter 2. The 1910 Federal Census, a listing of tribes, reservations, etc., by states .................. 7 Chapter 3. The 1910 Federal Census, Government list- ing of linguistic stocks, with index ........... 70 Chapter 4. A listing of records by agency ............. 123 Chapter 5. The American Tribal censuses, 1885-1940 ............................ 166 Chapter 6. A Bibliography by tribe .................. 203 Chapter 7. A Bibliography by states ................. 211 Appendix A. Indian language bibliography .............. 216 Appendix B. Government reports, population of tribes, 1825, 1853, 1867, 1890, 1980 .............. 218 Appendix C. Chart for calculating Indian blood .......... 235 Appendix D. Pedigree chart (sample) .................. 236 Appendix E. Family Group Sheet (sample) ............. 237 Appendix F. Religious records among Native Americans ... 238 Appendix G. Allotted tribes, etc. ..................... 242 Index ............................. .... 244 ii INTRODUCTION It is now six years since I started to satisfy my interest in Native American research and record- making for them as a people. While I have written extensively in the white man's way of record- making, my greatest satisfaction has come in the three volumes that have now been written about our Native Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Lakota Black Hills Treaty Rights
    LAKOTA BLACK HILLS TREATY RIGHTS http://www.tribalwisdom.org/treaties.html 1787 - Northwest Ordinance of 1787 – Stated that “The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their land and property shall never be taken from them without their consent…” 1825 - Removal Act – Created “Permanent Indian Country” in what was considered the “Great American Desert” – Areas west of the western borders of Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa and Minnesota – The year of “Trail of Tears” for Cherokee, Creek & Chickasaw as they are relocated to Oklahoma 1830 - Supreme Court Case (Worcester vs. Georgia) Determined that Indian Nations are “Distinct, independent political communities.” 1842 – First Wagon Trains cross Indian Country on the “Oregon Trail” 1849 – Gold discovered in California – 90,000 settlers moved west through Indian Country and split the Buffalo herd in half. 1851 – First Fort Laramie Treaty - Defined Tribal Areas, committed to a “lasting peace between all nations”, gave US Right to construct roads and military posts, agreed to compensate the tribes $50,000 per year for 50 years, indicated the Black Hills as Lakota land. Annuity could be in the form of farming supplies and cattle, to “save, if possible, some portion of these ill-fated tribes” according to BIA Supt. Mitchell. The US Senate reduced the annuity to 10 years without the Lakota’s knowledge 1857 – Grand Gathering of the Lakota – Held at the base of Bear Butte in the Black Hills. 7,500 Lakota gathered, including Red Cloud, Crazy Horse, and Sitting Bull who pledged to not allow further encroachment by whites. 1858 – Yankton Tribe sold 15 million acres to US, angering the other tribes, who questioned the Yankton’s authority to sell land without full Lakota consent.
    [Show full text]
  • BSB CH3 - 1 in Times of Battle, BIG ROAD Was War Chief to the Oglala Lakota
    CRAZY HORSE was the legendary Lakota war chief who led Sitting Bull’s warriors in the Valley of the Greasy Grass, known evermore as the Battle of Little Big Horn. The Lakota were accustomed to war. They had gained their prime hunting land by fighting other tribes, and were always ready to defend it. Crazy Horse was treated as a hero in his village. Without skilled war chiefs like him, life on the Great Plains would not be possible. Crazy Horse was a master of the four Lakota virtues: bravery, generosity, fortitude, and wisdom. He was skillful with bow and arrow, and rode his horse with ease. As leader of his lodge, Crazy Horse provided for his wives and children, while always doing his best to keep them safe. A man of strong medicine, Crazy Horse walked with an air of mystery, wandering the Great Plains alone as he spoke with the Ancestors. He refused to be photographed, and never grew accustomed to the strange ways of the White Man. As Lakota warriors prepared for the Wasichu to attack in 1876, Sitting Bull knew he was too weak from the Sun Dance to lead his people in battle. Crazy Horse, a famous war chief in his own right, stepped forward to serve in Sitting Bull’s place. Crying, “Strong hearts to the front, cowards to the rear,” Crazy Horse led the Lakota fearlessly, decimating the Wasichu at Little Big Horn. After the battle, life became difficult for the tribes. Hunted by Wasichu who wanted the Lakota to pay for their moment of victory, Crazy Horse was forced to surrender in 1877.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sioux Nation and Indian Territory: the Attempted Removal of 1876
    Copyright © 1976 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. The Sioux Nation and Indian Territory: The Attempted Removal of 1876 RICHMOND L.CLOW The second article of the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 gave the Sioux Nation sole ownership of the Black Hills country, which lay in western South Dakota. However, enterprising pioneers were not thwarted by the treaty provision and often tried to obtain possession of the region. White speculators living in Missouri River towns expounded on the possible mineral wealth to be found in the area. The lure of yellow gold provided an incentive for the federal government to move into the Black Hills country and open it to white settlers.' The United States Army, because of demands to open the Black Hills, sent Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer to explore the region in 1874. The small quantities of gold that he found led to a booming gold rush in the Sioux-controlled country of western South Dakota. The miners' illegal entry into that region forced Congress to try to obtain title to the disputed land.^ During this time of crisis with the western Sioux, Secretary of Interior Columbus Delano thought that the only way the federal government should deal or negotiate with the Sioux Nation for title to any portion of their reservation was through 1. U.S., Statutes at Large, vol. 15 (1869), 636; Donald Jackson, Cusier's Gold (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), p. 2; U.S., Congress, House, Hostile Indians in Dakota. H. Misc. Doc. 65, 44th Cong., 3d sess., 1873-1874 (Serial 1572), p.
    [Show full text]
  • HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS in TWO WORLDS by ANN
    HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS IN TWO WORLDS By ANN MARIE WASILEWSKI Bachelor of Arts Augusta College Augusta, Georgia 1969 Master of Education University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 1976 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION July, 2004 COPYRIGHT By Ann Marie Wasilewski July, 2004 ii HUNGRY GHOSTS: PONCA GIRLS IN TWO WORLDS Thesis Approved: Pamela U. Brown Thesis Advisor Pamela Fry Gary J. Conti Katye M. Perry Dr. Al Carlozzi Dean of the Graduate College ii Dedicated to my mother and father. Catherine Howard Wasilewski Walter John Wasilewski iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I want to express my deep gratitude to my dissertation advisor, Dr. Pam Brown, for her extreme patience, constructive guidance, and gentle encouragement. Your kind words were a balm to my soul as I struggled through this process. Second, I want to thank my committee members, Dr. Gary Conti, Dr. Pamela Fry, and Dr. Katye Perry. I am so appreciative of the time you spent reading my dissertation and for the suggestions you made to improve it. Third, I want to acknowledge two former members of my committee, Dr. Natalie Adams and Dr. Pamela Bettis, who moved on to different universities. Without your interest, guidance, and assistance I would not have made it this far. Fourth, I thank the Ponca girls and the members of the Ponca community who shared their thoughts and culture with me. It was a tremendous education. I also want to thank my Bahá’i friends, Nancy and Jim Schear, for their encouragement and the hours they spent with me at their dining room table going over my drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Dog's Case: a Chapter in the Legal History of Tribal Sovereignty
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research CUNY School of Law 1989 Crow Dog's Case: A Chapter in the Legal History of Tribal Sovereignty Sidney Harring CUNY School of Law How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cl_pubs/325 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] CROW DOG'S CASE: A CHAPTER IN THE LEGAL HISTORY OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY Sidney L. Harring* By any standard, Ex parte Crow Dog ranks among the most im- portant of the foundational cases in federal Indian law. Moreover, its place in the foundation, as the most important late nineteenth century tribal sovereignty case, means Crow Dog has continuing importance as American Indians, lawyers and scholars call for a new federal Indian law that recognizes tribal sovereignty and a continuing nation-to-nation relationship between the United States and the Indian tribes.' Even within this sovereignty framework, Crow Dog has special meaning. Its compelling story began with the killing of a Brule Sioux chief, Spotted Tail, by Crow Dog, who was later sentenced to hang for the crime. His conviction was reversed by the United States Supreme Court with a strong holding that the Brule had a sovereign right to their own law, leaving the United States courts with no jurisdiction. Felix Cohen, who very nearly originated the field of federal Indian law, refers to the case as "an extreme application of the doctrine of tribal sovereignty." 2 This characterization of the Crow Dog holding has always colored the case, leaving it a kind of legal atrocity, showing the "savage" quality of tribal law, and setting the stage for a succes- sion of doctrinal devices that emphasized tribal "dependency" * Associate Professor of Law, School of Law, City University of New York.
    [Show full text]
  • The Photographs
    TThhee PPhhoottooggrraapphhss Based on the Markus Liindner Liistiing iin the North Dakota Hiistory Journall 2005: 2-21. Piictures: Collllectiion Gregor Lutz / Addiitiions and comments iin bllue by Gregor Lutz III. Siittiing Bullll / Cllassiifiicatiion & need for clarification Nr Photograph / Description P i c t u r e L i c e n s e e X 01 Zalman Gilbert (?) Sitting Bull, or wearing a hat with butter- fly pinned to hatband R.L. Kelly or Time, location ? Gill, De Lancey W. or 1881 - 83, at Bismarck or George W. Scott Ft. Yates or at Pierre, South Dakota X 02 Zalman Gilbert (?) Sitting Bull, or wearing a hat with butter- fly pinned to hatband R.L. Kelly or Time, location ? Gill, De Lancey W. or 1881 - 83, at Bismarck or George W. Scott Ft. Yates or at Pierre, South Dakota X 03 Zalman Gilbert (?) Sitting Bull, or wearing a hat with butter- fly R.L. Kelly or Time, location ? Gill, De Lancey W. or 1881 / 82, Bismarck or Ft. George W. Scott Yates Colour Version X 04 Frank Currier Sioux Delegation 1875 Omaha, Nebraska, May 13, 1875 Julius Meyer a jewish Frank Currier operat- trader of Indian and ed a photography Chinese artefacts in studio on Farnham Omaha. Street, Omaha Meyer was born in Prussia now Germany, March 30, 1839. He emigrated to Omaha, Nebraska, in 1867 and began developing acquaintances with Plains Indians. He was fluent in some Indian languages, and became a trusted Interpreter and trader. Serving as an interpreter for Gen. George Crook, he later opened an Indian Curiosity shop, called the "Indian Wigwam" in Omaha Standing: Julius Meyer, Red Cloud Sitting: The person 1st row left is Sitting Bull, (not the Hunkpapa Sitting Bull, but Sitting Bull "The Good", Oglala), Swift Bear, Spotted Tail X 05 Frank Currier Sioux Delegation 1872 Omaha Standing: Louis Bordeaux, William Garnett, Julius Meyer Sitting: Sitting Bull (Oglala), Swift Bear, Spotted Tail, Red Cloud X 06 De Lancey W.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Dog Vs. Spotted Tail: Case Closed
    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2010 Crow Dog vs. Spotted Tail: Case Closed Timothy Connors Washtenaw County Circuit Court Vivek Sankaran University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1503 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Sankaran, Vivek. "Crow Dog vs. Spotted Tail: Case Closed." T. Connors, co-author. Mich. B. J. 89, no. 7 (2010): 36-8. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Michigan Bar journal July 2010 Family Law By Hon. Timothy Connors and Vivek Sankaran In 1868, Chief Spotted Tail signed a United States government The council ordered a transfer of items from Crow Dog to Spotted treaty with an X. Spotted Tail was a member of the Brule Sioux Tail's survivors for their continued support, and the matter was Tribe, related by marriage to Crazy Horse. The government treaty resolved. Or so they all thought.' recognized the Black Hills as part of the Great Sioux reservation. As such, exclusive use of the Black Hills by the Sioux people The United States Supreme Court Speaks was guaranteed.
    [Show full text]