Harrying of the North by the End of This Lesson YOU Will: Date Was the Harrying of the North 1069-70 a Genocide?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harrying of the North by the End of This Lesson YOU Will: Date Was the Harrying of the North 1069-70 a Genocide? BIG: What do you think of when you read this word? GENOCIDE IDEAS What does it Can you think of mean? any examples? BACK of book CLUE It comes from 2 other words- firstly from the Latin gēns and second Latin -cidium, from [massacre, kill]. Learning Focus: What was the impact of the Harrying of the north By the end of this lesson YOU will: Date Was the Harrying of the North 1069-70 a genocide? Key words: genocide = the deliberate and organised killing of a very large group of people especially those of one nationality or religion Harrying = to completely destroy Genocides Can you think of Can you think of any genocides in any genocides History? happening now? Al-Anfal Genocide In Iraq against Kurdish people. The campaign was led by Saddam Hussein’s cousin, Ali Hassan al- Majid, whose use of mustard gas, sarin, and VX nerve gas among other substances earned him the nickname “Chemical Ali.” It is estimated that more than 180,000 Kurds were killed. Chemical Ali was captured by the American military and executed for war crimes, including his role in the Kurdish genocide. Rwandan genocide People in Rwanda were split into 2 groups the Hutu and Tutsi. The Tutsi were generally wealthier. The Tutsi people ruled over the Hutus until the 1990s when a revolt began. Hutus began slaughtering the Tutsi. Hundreds of thousands were killed—the preferred method of execution being the machete, as ammunition was too expensive and difficult to come by. Rape, mutilation, and the deliberate spread of disease were also used as tools of terror. Native Americans Were wiped out in the years from 1492 when Europeans discovered the ‘New World’ or America. They took the natural resources that the Natives had lived off and brought & some say deliberately infected them with European diseases like smallpox that wiped them out. The Holocaust From 1933 when Hitler became chancellor of Germany the Jews were persecuted. This is called anti-Semitism. Rights were taken away gradually throughout the 1930s and at the end of the decade the Jews were herded into ghettos, and eventually shuttled in train cars to concentration and death camps, where they were murdered and tortured in the most inconceivable fashion. By 1945, when the camps were liberated, at least six million Jews had been killed. Reasons for the Harrying of the North a) William acting out of anger b) William acting strategically ( it was part of his strategy to keep power & prevent rebellion) Reasons: • Earl of Northumbria Robert Cumin was killed and thousands more Normans were killed in York, William swore revenge. • William was frustrated with the constant rebellions. • William was angry at the English leaders for not accepting him as king and for not being grateful that he had allowed them to keep their land and titles. • The northern rebels would not have an open battle with William. They scattered every time he advanced (moved forward towards them). Then would they launch surprise attacks on the Normans as soon as William went away to deal with rebellions elsewhere. William wanted to make it impossible for any rebels to remain in the area therefore he had to ‘harry’ the land. • The North of England was very different to the south. They hated Norman rule. Many wanted a Danish King. William realised he would have to put in place a harsh strategy to get them under control. They would not come onto his side unless he forced them to. • The rebellions in the North were triggering rebellions in other parts of the country. William had to crush it there and then using violent methods otherwise he would lose power. • He needed to punish the rebels so that others would not dare follow in their foot steps. • He needed to completely destroy the north otherwise the Danes would come back and get support from those in the north and start another rebellion. CHALLENGE: Order the reasons from 1-9 showing which you think was the most – least important reason for William. Write an explanation of your order Reasons for the Harrying of the North a) William acting out of anger b) William acting strategically ( it was part of his strategy to keep power & prevent rebellion) Reasons: • Earl of Northumbria Robert Cumin was killed and thousands more Normans were killed in York, William swore revenge. • William was frustrated with the constant rebellions. • William was angry at the English leaders for not accepting him as king and for not being grateful that he had allowed them to keep their land and titles. • The northern rebels would not have an open battle with William. They scattered every time he advanced (moved forward towards them). Then would they launch surprise attacks on the Normans as soon as William went away to deal with rebellions elsewhere. William wanted to make it impossible for any rebels to remain in the area therefore he had to ‘harry’ the land. • The North of England was very different to the south. They hated Norman rule. Many wanted a Danish King. William realised he would have to put in place a harsh strategy to get them under control. They would not come onto his side unless he forced them to. • The rebellions in the North were triggering rebellions in other parts of the country. William had to crush it there and then using violent methods otherwise he would lose power. • He needed to punish the rebels so that others would not dare follow in their foot steps. • He needed to completely destroy the north otherwise the Danes would come back and get support from those in the north and start another rebellion. CHALLENGE: Order the reasons from 1-9 showing which you think was the most – least important reason for William. Write an explanation of your order Reasons for the Harrying of the North a) William acting out of anger b) William acting strategically ( it was part of his strategy to keep power & prevent rebellion) • Reasons: • Earl of Northumbria Robert Cumin was killed and thousands more Normans were killed in York, William swore revenge. • William was frustrated with the constant rebellions. • William was angry at the English leaders for not accepting him as king and for not being grateful that he had allowed them to keep their land and titles. • The northern rebels would not have an open battle with William. They scattered every time he advanced (moved forward towards them). Then would they launch surprise attacks on the Normans as soon as William went away to deal with rebellions elsewhere. William wanted to make it impossible for any rebels to remain in the area therefore he had to ‘harry’ the land. • The North of England was very different to the south. They hated Norman rule. Many wanted a Danish King. William realised he would have to put in place a harsh strategy to get them under control. They would not come onto his side unless he forced them to. • The rebellions in the North were triggering rebellions in other parts of the country. William had to crush it there and then using violent methods otherwise he would lose power. • He needed to punish the rebels so that others would not dare follow in their foot steps. • He needed to completely destroy the north otherwise the Danes would come back and get support from those in the north and start another rebellion. CHALLENGE: Order the reasons from 1-8 showing which you think was the most – least important reason for William. Write an explanation of your order Impact of the Harrying of the north 1069-70 Immediate impact = happened in the days/months/next year following the harrying Long term impact = happened 10/20 years later – into the rest of William reign TASK: Go through the impacts and code them using the letters below: I = immediate impact LT = long term impact Impact of the Harrying of the North (immediate & long term) Impact I or LT? As many of 100,000 people died. The impacts were similar to a natural disaster. Immediate Human corpses were decaying in the street, swarming with worms. There was no one to bury the bodies, they were either impact = dead themselves or had fled. happened in There were no further uprisings from Anglo-Saxon (English) people in the north for the rest of William’s reign. the The Domesday Book was a record of landholding in England based on local surveys, it was done in 1085. it showed that in days/months/ Yorkshire the centre of the Harrying of the North that the region had not recovered from the destruction nearly 20 years later. There were also between 80,000 and 150,000 less people. next year Without any crops to eat or animals to slaughter and eat people starved. following the harrying When the Domesday survey was done from 1085 over 20 years later it was found that villages had still not recovered from the Harrying of the North. For example in Garforth, Leeds the value of the area in 1066 was 60 shillings, it was worth only 30 around 1086. Headingley was worth 40 shillings in 1066 and only 4 shillings in 1086. Long term It led to fear amongst the Anglo-Saxons. impact = The Danes did not come back to Yorkshire/Northumbria to gain support for another rebellion in the years after, this was happened because there was nothing there to support them. 10/20 years Due to the burning and destruction of food sources there was a famine. People were driven to eat the flesh of horses, later – into dogs, cats and even human beings.
Recommended publications
  • Anglo- Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066
    1.1 Anglo- Saxon society Key topic 1: Anglo- Saxon England and 1.2 The last years of Edward the Confessor and the succession crisis the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066 1.3 The rival claimants for the throne 1.4 The Norman invasion The first key topic is focused on the final years of Anglo-Saxon England, covering its political, social and economic make-up, as well as the dramatic events of 1066. While the popular view is often of a barbarous Dark-Ages kingdom, students should recognise that in reality Anglo-Saxon England was prosperous and well governed. They should understand that society was characterised by a hierarchical system of government and they should appreciate the influence of the Church. They should also be aware that while Edward the Confessor was pious and respected, real power in the 1060s lay with the Godwin family and in particular Earl Harold of Wessex. Students should understand events leading up to the death of Edward the Confessor in 1066: Harold Godwinson’s succession as Earl of Wessex on his father’s death in 1053 inheriting the richest earldom in England; his embassy to Normandy and the claims of disputed Norman sources that he pledged allegiance to Duke William; his exiling of his brother Tostig, removing a rival to the throne. Harold’s powerful rival claimants – William of Normandy, Harald Hardrada and Edgar – and their motives should also be covered. Students should understand the range of causes of Harold’s eventual defeat, including the superior generalship of his opponent, Duke William of Normandy, the respective quality of the two armies and Harold’s own mistakes.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is History?
    Year 7: Unit 1 – What is History? Timeline KEY TERMS The Romans invade England and begin their Someone’s view of an event. These points of view can be different depending upon 43 AD Interpretation 350 year rule. your experiences or situation. Sources are pieces of information that help historians to learn about the past. For 793 The Vikings first invade England. Source example, letters, diaries, photographs. They were made at the time. 1066 William of Normandy conquers England. Chronology This is the arrangement of dates or events in time order. 1215 The Magna Carta is created. BC means ‘Before Christ’ and refers to the years before 1AD. Also known as BCE BC The Black Death reaches England and kills which stands for ‘Before Common Era’. 1348 one-third of the population. AD means ‘Anno Domini’ which is Latin for ‘in the year of our Lord’. This refers to the AD Henry VIII begins to break away from the years after 1AD. 1533 Catholic Church and starts the Church of England. Decade A decade is a period of ten years in time. The first time Britain set up control in Century A century is a period of one-hundred years in time. 1607 another country (Jamestown in America). The Medieval period is also known as the ‘Middle Ages’. This was a period between Medieval This started the British Empire. the 6th century to the 15th century. 1914- The First World War. This refers to a source which was made at the time of an event. For example, a diary Primary Source 1918 written by a soldier during the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • (Schools History Project) the Norman Conquest, 1065
    Qualification Accredited GCSE (9–1) Candidate Style Answers HISTORY B (SCHOOLS HISTORY PROJECT) J411 For first teaching in 2016 J411 - The Norman conquest, 1065 - 1087 Version 1 www.ocr.org.uk/history GCSE (9–1) History B (Schools History Project) Candidate Style Answers Contents Introduction 3 QUESTION 6(a) High level response 4 Commentary 4 Medium level reponse 4 Commentary 4 QUESTION 6(b) High level response 5 Commentary 5 Medium level reponse 5 Commentary 5 Question 7 High level response 6 Commentary 6 Medium level reponse 7 Commentary 7 Question 9 High level response 8 Commentary 8 Medium level reponse 9 Commentary 9 2 © OCR 2017 GCSE (9–1) History B (Schools History Project) Candidate Style Answers Introduction This resource has been produced by a senior member of the GCSE History examining team to offer teachers an insight into how the assessment objectives are applied. It illustrates how the sample assessment questions might be answered and provides some commentary on what factors contribute to overall levels. As these responses have not been through full moderation, they have not been graded and are instead, banded to give an indication of the level of each response. Please note that this resource is provided for advice and guidance only and does not in any way constitute an indication of grade boundaries or endorsed answers. 3 © OCR 2017 GCSE (9–1) History B (Schools History Project) Candidate Style Answers Question 6(a) In Interpretation A the historian Robert Bartlett argues that the ‘Harrying of the North’ had a powerful impact on northern England.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Point - Read Each Statement and Decide If It Is True Or False
    Mid-point - Read each statement and decide if it is true or false. 1. Harold Godwinson lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 2. Harald Hardrada lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 3. William of Normandy won the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 4. William of Normandy won the Battle of Hastings. 5. William of Normandy was an inexperienced General. 6. William of Normandy was an experienced General. 7. William ordered the harrying of the north. 8. William ordered the harrying of the south. 9. The Feudal system had four parts with the peasants at the bottom. 10. The Feudal system had five parts with the peasants at the bottom. Mid-point - Read each statement and decide if it is true or false. 1. Harold Godwinson lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 2. Harald Hardrada lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 3. William of Normandy won the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 4. William of Normandy won the Battle of Hastings. 5. William of Normandy was an inexperienced General. 6. William of Normandy was an experienced General. 7. William ordered the harrying of the north. 8. William ordered the harrying of the south. 9. The Feudal system had four parts with the peasants at the bottom. 10. The Feudal system had five parts with the peasants at the bottom. Mid-point - Read each statement and decide if it is true or false. 1. Harold Godwinson lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 2. Harald Hardrada lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 3. William of Normandy won the Battle of Stamford Bridge. 4. William of Normandy won the Battle of Hastings.
    [Show full text]
  • Feudal System and Harrying of the North
    Date: How did William control England after his successful conquest? Baron: Important landowners in Normandy (Similar to the Earls in England) Harrying: Frequently carrying out attacks Feudal System: A hierarchy of society (most important to least) with everyone having a role rewrite this correcting any mistakes you find – there are harold had to go up to stanford brige to have a fight with harald hardrada. This was about 250 miles. He then heard that William had sailed across and invaded. He had to march all the way back really quick. He left some trops. rewrite this correcting any mistakes you find – there are harold had to go up to stanford brige to have a fight with harald hardrada. This was about 250 miles. He then heard that William had sailed across and invaded. He had to march all the way back really quick. He left some trops. Harold had to go up to Stamford Bridge to have a fight with Harald Hardrada. This was about 300 miles. He then heard that William had sailed across and invaded. He had to march all the way back really quick. He left some troops. There were over c.1.5 million people living in England and William only had a few thousand soldiers. He needed to be in control and most importantly, he needed his baron’s support! This is why William introduced the Feudal System… What can you remember about the Feudal System from a few weeks ago? Copy these key terms: At this time, people believed that all the land in a kingdom Fealty: An oath of was given to the king by God.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Organiser Focus: the Norman Conquest
    Knowledge Organiser Focus: The Norman Conquest I should already know: Key Words How to plot and use a Cavalry Mounted soldiers on horseback timeline in chronological Claimant Someone believing they should be king order. Feigned Retreat Pretending to run away so that enemy is tricked into following Feudal System Hierarchy of society, with the King at the top I will learn: Fyrd Anglo-Saxon soldiers who joined the army at times of trouble. They • What life was like pre- were usually farmers and were poorly trained. 1066. • Why there was a Housecarls Full-time, well-trained Anglo-Saxon warriors succession crisis in 1066. Oath A very serious promise • The 3 main contenders for Shield Wall Overlapping shields in battle for protection the throne: Harold Godwinson, Harald Hardrada, William of Greater Depth Challenge Normandy How important was Tostig? • The events of the 3 main Tostig Godwinson: brother of battles: Gate Fulford, Harold Godwinson and Earl of Stamford Bridge, Hastings. Northumbria. He lost his • The effects of the Norman Earldom because of his Conquest including the tyrannical rule and joined Harrying of the North Edward the Confessor died in Hardrada. 1066 with no heirs, This will help in the future: leaving a disputed Further Reading succession and 3 Fact: https://www.bbc.com/bitesize Crime and Punishment through main claimants for /guides/zsjnb9q/revision/1 time the throne. This led Anglo-Saxon & Norman Britain to 3 battles taking Fiction: 1066 (I was there) by Jim place that year. Eldridge Knowledge Organiser Focus: The Norman Conquest Summarise your learning Chronology: what happened on these dates? 1043 Edward the Confessor crowned King of England Anglo- Anglo-Saxons England was Saxon a largely peaceful and 1064 Harold’s embassy to Normandy society prosperous kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Anglo-Norman England Has Long Been a Fertile
    INTRODUCTION Anglo-Norman England has long been a fertile subject for the study of medieval military history. Its preeminence is due in large measure to the events of 14 October 1066, during which William, duke of Normandy, wrested control of England away from Harold Godwinson at the Battle of Hastings. The result was a wave of changes that permanently altered the land of the Anglo-Saxons. Many of these changes directly influenced the methods by which the English crown conducted warfare, including the advent of a baronage and the importation of a feudal system of military obligation, both introduced after William’s coronation on Christmas 1066. William brought a policy of conquest and domination to England that defied compar- ison to the former Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. The Old English kings fought primarily defensive battles to preserve the Heptarchy against Viking and Danish expansion from the ninth to the eleventh century. In these endeavors the Saxons were only partially successful; the strong West Saxon-Kentish state built by Alfred (879–899) grew to include lands in the uncertain regions of Northumbria and Mercia, but the advent of the Danelaw and the return of Viking invasions in the late tenth century eroded the stability of the country. By the eleventh century Edward the Confessor (1042–1066) and his earls were struggling to maintain England’s borders in the rebellious west and north. In the years after Hastings, William solidified his reign through military operations such as the 1070 ‘harrying of the north’ with the Scots, as well as diplomatic moves that gained him the fealty of Welsh princes in 1081.
    [Show full text]
  • Northallerton 1138
    English Heritage Battlefield Report: Northallerton 1138 Northallerton or 'The Standard' (22 August 1138) Parishes: Brompton; Northallerton District: Hambleton County: North Yorkshire Grid Ref: SE360977 (centred on battlefield monument) Historical Context The Battle of Northallerton, or The Standard, was fought in August 1138 as a consequence of King David I of Scotland's attempt to profit by the troubles attending King Stephen's rule in England. Stephen had seized the throne on the death of King Henry I in 1135 but much of the country preferred to recognise the late King's designated successor, his daughter the Empress Matilda. Baronial revolt was widespread and Stephen was fully occupied near Bristol when, in July 1138, David of Scotland made his third and largest incursion of the year into England. As an uncle of the disinherited Matilda King David was ostensibly acting in her interest, but it was widely believed that the Scots king harboured an ambition to annex Northumberland. Resistance to Scottish depredations was organized by Archbishop Thurstan of York, the King's Lieutenant in the north who made the task of repelling the Scots a holy crusade. It was because he was so successful in raising an army that the ecclesiastical chroniclers, who provide us with most of our information about Norman England, took a particular interest in the Northallerton campaign. This ensured that the Battle of the Standard and the events that preceded it were remarkably well-documented. Thurstan's army gathered at York and then marched north to Thirsk. From there two barons rode on to try to negotiate with King David.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, C.1060-1088 Paper 2 British Depth Study
    Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 Paper 2 British Depth Study: Anglo-Saxon and Norman England c.1060-88 Name ………………………………………………….. 1 Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 Anglo-Saxon and Norman England – Revision Checklist How well do I know each topic? 3 Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest 4 What was England like in Anglo-Saxon times? 8 Edward the Confessor’s last years 11 1066 and the rival claimants for the throne 13 The Norman invasion 15 Topic Test – Theme 1: Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest 16 William I in Power: Securing the Kingdom, 1066-87 17 Establishing control 20 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068-71 22 The legacy of resistance to 1087 25 Revolt of the Earls, 1075 27 Topic Test – Theme 2: Securing the Kingdom, 1066-87 29 Norman England, 1066-88 30 The feudal system 32 The Church 35 Norman government 37 Norman aristocracy 39 William I and his sons 41 Topic Test – Theme 3: Norman England, 1066-88 Produced by J. Harris, Sir Harry Smith Community College 2 Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 Theme 1: Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-66 3 Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 What was England like in Anglo-Saxon times? England had a population of about 2 million people (less than half of London today!) Almost everyone farmed land. England was a Christian country, and religion played a large role in everyday life. For centuries England had been under threat from the Vikings, and parts of northern England had Viking settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bayeux Tapestry: Norman and English Perspectives Intertwined
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2004 The Bayeux Tapestry: Norman and English Perspectives Intertwined Maria Dajcar University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Dajcar, Maria, "The Bayeux Tapestry: Norman and English Perspectives Intertwined. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4652 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Maria Dajcar entitled "The Bayeux Tapestry: Norman and English Perspectives Intertwined." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History. Robert Bast, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: ARRAY(0x7f6ff822e9e0) Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Maria Dajcar entitled "The Bayeux Tapestry: Norman and English Perspectives Intertwined". I have examined the final paper copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo–Saxon and Norman England
    Anglo– Saxon and Norman England Introduction to Year 12 History Prince Henry’s High School – History department An introduction to A Level History – Building project for Year 11’s This booklet provides you with an introduction to the A Level History course at Prince Henry’s. The aim of this project is to give you an opportunity to read around the topic and to build up your knowledge on Unit 1 before beginning the course in September. There is a wide range of different activities for you to attempt in preparation for the start of Year 12. You are not expected to complete everything included in this booklet but try to attempt as much as you can. Throughout the A Level, you will study a combination of different time periods which will encompass key events of the 20th century alongside pre 20th century units. The History course is comprised of four units of work. Unit 1 Anglo Saxon England and the Norman Conquest 1035-1107: (25%) - This unit includes the last Kings of the Anglo Saxons, The Norman invasion and rule under William I and II. Unit 2 The Cold War in Asia 1945 – 1993: (15%) - This unit covers Western influence in Asia, The Korean War, Indochina and the Wars in Vietnam and Cambodia Unit 3 Civil Rights in the USA 1865 – 1992: (40%) - This unit covers African Americans, Native Americans, Women, the New Deal, Malcolm X and Black Power Unit 4 Coursework: (20%) - This unit covers an independent study on one of three essay questions. The essay questions focus on either the reasons that women won the vote in WW1, the USA in Vietnam or the death of William Rufus.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Organiser: History Year 7 Conquest and Control
    Knowledge Organiser: History Year 7 Conquest and control Key information Key information Key events The Norman Conquest was the Norman invasion of Britain in On the 25th December 1066 William was crowned William the Battle of Fulford Gate (19th September 1066) 1066. Following the death of Edward the Confessor, there were Conqueror the first Norman King of England (1066–1087) Battle of Stamford Bridge (28th September 1066) three main contenders for the English throne. William, Duke of Harrying of the North - Some English people rebelled against William. Battle of Hasting (14th October 1066) Normandy, was one of these contenders. He successfully The biggest rebellion was in the north of England in 1069. It was led by Bayeux Tapestry, medieval embroidery depicting the Norman invaded England. Following this, William spent nine years Edgar the Atheling who, as the only son of Edward the Exiled, who had Conquest of England in 1066, conquering and gaining control of the whole of England. a blood-claim to the throne. William defeated the rebellion but he still Harrying of the North - 28th September 1066, William Duke of Normandy arrives in the didn't trust the English people. In the north-east of England, from south of England (Pevensay Bay) he sets up camp with his army 1069 to 1070, he ordered villages to be destroyed and people to be Key people and wait for the arrival of Harold and his Anglo Saxon army to killed. Herds of animals and crops were burnt. Most people who King Edward the Confessor - Edward the Confessor was one of arrive.
    [Show full text]