DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA's in Space Manufacturing Initiative and Additive Manufacturing Development for Rocket Engine Space Flight Hardware

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA's in Space Manufacturing Initiative and Additive Manufacturing Development for Rocket Engine Space Flight Hardware 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s In Space Manufacturing Initiative and Additive Manufacturing Development for Rocket Engine Space Flight Hardware Presented to: Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine October 13, 2016 shall Beckman Center r Irvine, California ma R.G. Clinton, Jr. www.nasa.gov Acting Manager, Science and Technology Office NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center1 Contributors • Kristin Morgan: NASA MSFC Additive Manufacturing Lead • Dr. Tracie Prater: NASA MSFC In Space Manufacturing Material Characterization Lead • Elizabeth Robertson: NASA MSFC Additive Manufactured Engine Technology Development • Mike Snyder: Made In Space Chief Designer • Niki Werkheiser: NASA MSFC In Space Manufacturing Project Manager • Andrew Owens: NASA Tech Fellow, MIT PhD Canidate 2 Agenda • Discussion Topics – How is Additive Manufacturing Used in Your Field/Application Area Today? – How Do You Expect Additive Manufacturing to be Used in ISM Portfolio 5 Years? – Why Have You Chosen to Move into Additive Manufacturing, and What Technical Capabilities Are You Focused On? – What Do You Believe the Major Challenges Are to More Effective Use of Additive Manufacturing? – What Corollary or Overlapping Technologies have been Important to the Effective Utility of Additive Manufacturing in your Application Space? • In Space Manufacturing Initiative (ISM) – In Space Manufacturing Path to Exploration – Evolvable Mars Campaign Assessment – ISM Portfolio – ISM Program Timeline • Additive Manufacturing Development for Rocket Engine Space Flight Hardware – Additive Manufactured Engine Technology Development (AMETD) – Proposed Engineering and Quality Standard for Additively Manufactured Spaceflight Hardware – Challenges to Effective Use of Additive Manufacturing • Summary 3 Additive Manufacturing at Marshall Space Flight Center In Space Manufacturing Initiative 4 In-space Manufacturing Path to Exploration GROUND- EARTH RELIANT PROVING GROUND EARTH INDEPENDENT BASED ISS Cis-lunar Mars Earth-Based Platform • Certification & Inspection Process • Design Properties Database • Additive Manufacturing Automation ISS Test-bed Platform • Ground-based • 3D Print Demo • Additive Planetary Surfaces Platform Technology • Multi-materials Fab Lab Maturation & Manufacturing Facility Demonstration • In-space Recycling (metals, polymers, automation, • AM for Exploration • In-space Metals printable electronics) Support Systems (e.g. • Printable Electronics • Multi-material Fab Lab • Food/Medical Grade Polymer ECLSS) Design, Printing & Recycling Development & Test • In-line NDE • External • Additive Construction • Additive Construction Space • Regolith (Feedstock) Manufacturing Technologies Launch • On-demand Parts System • Regolith Materials – Feedstock Catalogue Asteroids • Exploration Systems • AM Exploration Systems Demonstration and Operational Validation Text Color Legend Foundational AM Capabilities AM for Exploration Systems Surface / ISRU Systems 5 ISM Provides Solutions for Exploration Logistics Reduction in Spares Mass Requirements ISM significantly reduces the mass that For Items Manufactured in Space needs to be carried to cover maintenance demands by enabling on-demand manufacturing from common raw materials -78.3% ISM enables the use of recycled materials and in-situ resources, allowing even more dramatic reductions in mass requirements -97.7% ISM enables flexibility, giving systems a broad capability to adapt to unanticipated circumstances. This mitigates risks that are Decreasing Mass not covered by current approaches to maintainability. In-Space Manufacturing is a strong Without With ISM + solution to maintenance logistics ISM ISM Recycling challenges that can - Reduce mass This case examined parts associated with fluid flow (i.e. - Mitigate risk fans, valves, ducts, piping, etc.). Approx. 1/3 of total - Enable adaptable systems components were assumed to be manufactured in-space. 6 Owens and de Weck 2016 Evolvable Mars Campaign Conclusions and Recommendations EMC Conclusions • ISM is a necessary paradigm shift in space operations, not a ‘bonus’ • Applications should look at recreating function, not form • ISM is a capability, not a subsystem, and has broad applications EMC Key Recommendations • ISM team needs to be working with exploration system designers now to identify high-value application areas and influence design • Define driving functional and interface requirements • Provide expertise to designers to translate traditional design to ISM design • Perform testing and demonstration • Monitor and leverage rapidly advancing commercial advanced manufacturing technologies • Adapt commercial technology for spaceflight applications to take advantage of cost/schedule savings • Collaborate with industry, academia, other government • ISS is a critical testbed for driving out these capabilities • Develop technology and process experience via on-orbit testing • Identify demo/test opportunities for existing ISM infrastructure (3DP, AMF) • Develop and test FabLab in preparation for springboard to Cis-lunar ‘Proving Ground’ 7 In-space Manufacturing Portfolio EXPLORATION MULTI- IN-SPACE DESIGN DATABASE IN-SPACE IN-SPACE MATERIAL ’FAB PRINTED V&V & TESTING POLYMERS RECYCLING LAB’ RACK ELECTRONICS (In-transit & Surface PROCESS Systems • Develop • Refabricator • Develop Multi- • MSFC • Develop & design-level ISS Demo with material Conductive & Baseline on- database for • ISS On- Tethers Fabrication Dielectric Inks orbit, in- applications demand Mfctr. Unlimited, Inc. Laboratory patented process • Materials dev. w/polymers. (TUI) for on- Rack as • Designed & certification & characterize • 3D Print Tech orbit 3D ‘springboard’ Tested RFID process based for feedstocks Demo Printing & for Exploration Antenna, Tags upon the (in-transit & • Additive Recycling. missions and ultra- DRAFT surface) in Manufacturing • Multiple • In-space capacitors Engineering MAPTIS DB. Facility with SBIRs Metals ISS • 2017 ISM SBIR and Quality • Design & test Made in underway on Demo subtopic Standards for high-value Space, Inc. common-use • nScrypt Multi- • Collaboration Additively components • Material materials & material w/Ames on Manufactured for ISS & Characterizati medical/food machine at plasma jet Space Flight Exploration MSFC for R&D technology. on & Testing grade recycler Hardware (ground & ISS)8 Transition to In-space Manufacturing Program Timeline ‘Proving Ground’ FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 PH.2 CIS- LAUNCH PH. 1 3D ISS Print Tech Demo ISS OPS ISS OPS ISS PH.2 LUNAR PH.1 END BUILD TEST & PH. 1 RESULTS RESULTS BEGIN & CERT TESTING ISS Additive LAUNCH ISS ULTEM Manufacturing Facility PARTS DEVELOP & ISS OGS BUILD ADAPTER ISS COMMERCIAL & NASA UTILIZATION (AMF) MFCTR ISS DEMO ISS DEMO PH. PDR CDR LAUNCH ISS DEMO OPS PH. 1 SBIR 2 SBIR In-Space Recycling ISS DEMO PH. 2E/3 SBIR ISS DEMO TEST & RESULTS RECYCLER SLS Launch SBIR Ph. I Food &Medical Grade Printer/Recycler Development & Flight DESIGN, BUILD & GROUND DEMO ISS FLIGHT CERT YET2 TECH ISS Multi-Material ‘Fab Lab’ RFI LAUNCH SEARCH FAB LAB FAB LAB TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PH. B FAB LAB BAA PH. C FAB LAB Rack (Metallics, Polymers, PH. A FAB LAB SLS BAA etc.) FAB LAB BAA Launch BAA DEV Technology Infusion Technology into Fab Lab Lab Rack Fab into I METALS DEV. ISS METALS DEMO In-Space Metals WOHLERS MIS CASTING Development STUDY Dynetics LCVD IN-SPACE METALS FAB TECHSHOT SBIR PH. 1 LAB INFUSION INK DEVELOPMENT ISS RFID PH. 1 SBIR PH. 2 SBIR Design & Test Printable Electronics PRINTABLE ELECTRONICS FAB LAB INFUSION GROUND TESTING In-Space Verification and IN-PROCESS NDE FAB LAB ISS ISM V&V ISS V&V UTILIZATION INFUSION Validation (In-process CATALOG DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP DEVELOPMENT (MSFC) ISM V&V NDE) BASELINE (ISS) EXPLORATION SYSTEMS V&V TESTING Exploration Systems ISM EMC IDENTIFY & GROUND TEST EXPLORATION FAB LAB MFCTR OF EXPLORATION PARTS EXPLORATION Design Database & QUANTITATIVE COMPONENTS UTILIZATION BENEFIT PARTS Component Testing ANALYSIS DEVELOP & TEST ISM DESIGN DATABASE FOR EXPLORATION FUNCTIONAL ISM must influence Exploration design now & develop the corresponding technologies. At the current resource levels, ISM will not achieve needed capability within the required mission timeframe. 9 Additive Manufacturing at Marshall Space Flight Center Additive Manufacturing Development for Rocket Engine Space Flight Hardware 10 Strategic Vision for Future AM Engine Systems Building Experience Defining the Development “Smart Buyer” to enable Philosophy of the Future Commercial Partners • Dramatic Reduction in Design Development, Test and Evaluation (DDT&E) Cycles • Transforming Manual to Automated Manufacturing • Integrating Design with Manufacturing Bridging the gap between the present and future projects that Building Foundational are coming Industrial Base Enabling & Developing Revolutionary Technology Transferring “Open Rights” SLM Material Property Data & Technology to U.S. Industry 11 Game-Changing Aspects State of the Art Additive Manufactured Engine Technology Development • DDT&E Cost 1/10th Dev Cost & • AMETD Cost – $1-4 Billion Resources – $50 Million (projected) – 500 FTE – 50 FTE • DDT&E Time 1/2 Dev Lead Time • AMETD DDT&E Time – 7-10 years – 2-4 years • Hardware Lead Times 1/6th Production Time • Hardware Lead Times – 3-6 Years – 6-12 Months • Engine Cost 1/10th Reoccurring Cost • AMETD Engine Cost – $20 - $50 Million – $1-5 Million • Applicability • Applicability – Often proprietary – Provide relevant data
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advancements in Rocket Technology
    Advancements in Rocket Technology Prepared by Marcelo Fernando Condori Mendoza Credits: NASA https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/overview.html 1. History of Rocketry Ancient Rockets Rockets for Warfare Rockets as Inventions Early - Mid 20th Century Rockets Space Race Rockets Future Rockets Space Launch System (SLS) Overview NASA’s Space Launch System, or SLS, is an advanced launch vehicle that provides the foundation for human exploration beyond Earth’s orbit. Credits: NASA https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/00 80_sls_fact_sheet_10162019a_final_508.pdf The Power to Explore Beyond Earth’s Orbit To fill America’s future needs for deep space missions, SLS will evolve into increasingly more powerful configurations. The first SLS vehicle, called Block 1, was able to send more than 26 metric tons (t) or 57,000 pounds (lbs.) to orbits beyond the Moon. https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/overview.html Block 1 - Initial SLS Configuration Block 1 - Initial SLS Configuration Credits: NASA What is SpaceX? QUESTION SpaceX headquarters in December Spaceflight Industries will carry and 2017; plumes from a flight of a launch a cluster of Kleos satellites on Falcon 9 rocket are visible overhead the SpaceX Falcon 9 scheduled for launch mid 2021. Space Exploration Technologies Corp., trading as SpaceX, is an American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation services company headquartered in Hawthorne, California, which was founded in 2002 by Elon Mask. An Airbus A321 on final assembly line 3 in the Airbus plant at Hamburg Finkenwerder Airport Main important events The goal was reducing space transportation costs to enable the colonization of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Minimizing hydraulic losses in additively-manufactured swirl coaxial rocket injectors via analysis-driven design methods Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n51c078 Author Morrow, David Publication Date 2020 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Minimizing hydraulic losses in additively-manufactured swirl coaxial rocket injectors via analysis-driven design methods A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering by David Morrow 2020 c Copyright by David Morrow 2020 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Minimizing hydraulic losses in additively-manufactured swirl coaxial rocket injectors via analysis-driven design methods by David Morrow Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2020 Professor Raymond M. Spearrin, Chair Additive manufacturing (AM) has matured significantly over the past decade and become a highly attractive tool for reducing manufacturing complexity and removing traditional de- sign constraints. This is particularly desirable for rocket combustion devices which often feature hundreds of individual parts with precise tolerances. The degree to which AM can be used to improve combustion device performance, however, has been less rigorously ex- plored. In this work, hydraulic performance impacts associated with and enabled by AM are assessed for a liquid bi-propellant swirl coaxial injector. Specifically, a single-element liquid oxygen/kerosene injector based on a canonical design was manufactured from inconel using Direct Metal Laser Sintering at two different coaxial recess depths. Cold-flow testing for the as-manufactured baseline injector found a reduction in the designed discharge coefficients, which is primarily attributed to increased surface roughness inherent in the AM process.
    [Show full text]
  • CCP Meet the Crew Brochure
    SpaceX Demo 2 Boeing Crew Flight Test National Aeronautics and Stay connected with NASA’s Space Administration Commercial Crew Program: www.twitter.com/commercial_crew Bob Behnken Doug Hurley Nicole Aunapu Mann Chris Ferguson Mike Fincke NASA Astronaut NASA Astronaut www.facebook.com/NASACommercialCrew NASA Astronaut Boeing Astronaut NASA Astronaut Air Force Colonel Marine Corps Colonel (retired) Marine Corps Lt Colonel Navy Captain (retired) Air Force Colonel (retired) Flew aboard space shuttle Piloted space shuttle Endeavor for Selected as an Astronaut in 2013, Piloted space shuttle Atlantis for Aboard shuttle Endeavour on Endeavour twice as a Mission STS-127 and Atlantis for STS-135, www.nasa.gov/commercialcrew this is Nicole’s first spaceflight. STS-115, and commanded shuttle STS-134, Fincke served as Specialist, first on STS-123 and the final space shuttle mission. Endeavour on STS-126 and Atlantis Mission Specialist 1 on the flight then on STS-130. on STS-135, the final flight of the deck and as a spacewalker and Space Shuttle Program. robotic arm operator. blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew SpaceX’s First Operational Mission Boeing’s First Operational Mission MEET THE Mike Hopkins Victor Glover Suni Williams Josh Cassada NASA Astronaut NASA Astronaut NASA Astronaut NASA Astronaut Air Force Colonel Navy Commander Navy Captain (retired) Navy Commander Spent 166 days on the Selected as an Astronaut in 2013, Spent 322 days in space on two Selected as an Astronaut in 2013, International Space Station for this is Victor’s first spaceflight. space station missions, Expeditions this is Josh’s first spaceflight. Expeditions 37/38. 14/15 and Expeditions 32/33.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment for Issuing an Experimental Permit to Spacex for Operation of the Dragonfly Vehicle at the Mcgregor Test Site, Mcgregor, Texas
    THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Final Environmental Assessment for Issuing an Experimental Permit to SpaceX for Operation of the DragonFly Vehicle at the McGregor Test Site, McGregor, Texas AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), lead; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, cooperating agency. ABSTRACT: This Final Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the potential environmental impacts of FAA’s Proposed Action of issuing an experimental permit to Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) for operation of the DragonFly reusable launch vehicle (RLV) at the McGregor test site, in McGregor, Texas. This Final EA evaluates the potential impacts of the operation of the DragonFly RLV as well as construction of a launch pad. Potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative analyzed in detail in this Final EA include impacts to air quality; noise and compatible land use; Department of Transportation Act: Section 4(f); historical, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources; fish, wildlife, and plants; water quality (surface waters, groundwater, wetlands, and floodplains); natural resources and energy supply; hazardous materials, pollution prevention, and solid waste; light emissions and visual impacts; and socioeconomics, environmental justice, and children’s environmental health risks and safety risks. Potential cumulative impacts of the Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative are also addressed in this Final EA. PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA; 42 United States Code 4321, et seq.), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, Change 1, the FAA published a Notice of Availability of the Draft EA in the Federal Register on May 21, 2014, which started a 30‐day public review and comment period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commercial Satellite Industry: What’S up and What’S on the Horizon
    S. HRG. 115–569 THE COMMERCIAL SATELLITE INDUSTRY: WHAT’S UP AND WHAT’S ON THE HORIZON HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 25, 2017 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( Available online: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 35–753 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:09 Mar 27, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\35753.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JOHN THUNE, South Dakota, Chairman ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi BILL NELSON, Florida, Ranking ROY BLUNT, Missouri MARIA CANTWELL, Washington TED CRUZ, Texas AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota DEB FISCHER, Nebraska RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut JERRY MORAN, Kansas BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii DAN SULLIVAN, Alaska EDWARD MARKEY, Massachusetts DEAN HELLER, Nevada CORY BOOKER, New Jersey JAMES INHOFE, Oklahoma TOM UDALL, New Mexico MIKE LEE, Utah GARY PETERS, Michigan RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois CORY GARDNER, Colorado MAGGIE HASSAN, New Hampshire TODD YOUNG, Indiana CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Nevada NICK ROSSI, Staff Director ADRIAN ARNAKIS, Deputy Staff Director JASON VAN BEEK, General Counsel KIM LIPSKY, Democratic Staff Director CHRIS DAY, Democratic Deputy Staff Director RENAE BLACK, Senior Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:09 Mar 27, 2019 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\35753.TXT JACKIE C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on October 25, 2017 .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 MRO’s Bumpy Path Rolls Speeds Back to Recovery to Supersonics ™ $14.95 AUGUST 17-30, 2020 ADVANCING AIR MOBILITY Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Rocket Propulsion Industrial Base Assessment
    OMB Control Number: ####-#### Expiration Date: 12/31/2017 U.S. ROCKET PROPULSION INDUSTRIAL BASE ASSESSMENT: Propulsion Survey SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Technology Evaluation (OTE), in coordination with the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) co-chaired Joint Army, Navy, NASA, Air Force Interagency Propulsion Committee (JANNAF) is conducting a survey and assessment of organizations responsible for the research, design, engineering, development, manufacture, testing, and integration of rocket propulsion-related products, components, and services. The principal goal of this assessment is to gain an understanding of the intricate supply chain network supporting the development, production, and sustainment of products and services across both the U.S. Government and commercial propulsion-related sectors. With the data collected in this survey, U.S. Government agencies will be better informed and able to develop targeted planning, acquisition, and investment strategies to ensure industry's ability to support critical defense and civil missions and programs. RESPONSE TO THIS SURVEY IS REQUIRED BY LAW A response to this survey is required by law (50 U.S.C. App. Sec. 2155). Failure to respond can result in a maximum fine of $10,000, imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Information furnished herewith is deemed confidential and will not be published or disclosed except in accordance with Section 705 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C App. Sec. 2155). Section 705 prohibits the publication or disclosure of this information unless the President determines that its withholding is contrary to the national defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacex Crew Dragon Conducts Propulsive Hover and Parachute Drop Tests 1 February 2016, by Ken Kremer
    SpaceX Crew Dragon conducts propulsive hover and parachute drop tests 1 February 2016, by Ken Kremer vehicle rising and descending slowly on the test stand. The SuperDracos generate a combined total of 33,000 lbs of thrust. SpaceX is developing the Crew Dragon under the Commercial Crew Program (CCP) awarded by NASA to transport crews of four or more astronauts to the International Space Station. "This test was the second of a two-part milestone under NASA's Commercial Crew Program," said SpaceX officials. "The first test—a short firing of the SpaceX Dragon 2 crew vehicle, powered by eight engines intended to verify a healthy propulsion SuperDraco engines, conducts propulsive hover test at system—was completed November 22, and the the company’s rocket development facility in McGregor, longer burn two-days later demonstrated vehicle Texas. Credit: SpaceX control while hovering." The first unmanned and manned orbital test flights of the crew Dragon are expected sometime in On the road to restoring US Human spaceflight 2017. A crew of two NASA astronauts should fly on from US soil, SpaceX conducted a pair of key tests the first crewed test before the end of 2017. involving a propulsive hover test and parachute drop test for their Crew Dragon vehicle which is Initially, the Crew Dragon will land via parachutes in slated to begin human missions in 2017. the ocean before advancing to use of pinpoint propulsive landing. SpaceX released a short video showing the Dragon 2 vehicle executing a "picture-perfect Thus SpaceX recently conducted a parachute drop propulsive hover test" on a test stand at the firms test involving deployment of four red-and-white rocket development facility in McGregor, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Space Launch Vehicles Used by The
    Current Space Launch Vehicles Used by the HEET United States S Nathan Daniels April 2014 At present, the United States relies on Russian rocket engines to launch satellites ACT into space. F The U.S. also relies on Russia to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station (as the U.S. Space Shuttle program ended in 2011). Not only does this reliance have direct implications for our launch capabilities, but it also means that we are funding Russian space and missile technology while we could be investing in U.S. based jobs and the defense industrial base. These facts raises national security concerns, as the United States’ relationship with Russia is ever-changing - the situation in Ukraine is a prime example. This paper serves as a brief, but factual overview of active launch vehicles used by the United States. First, are the three vehicles with the payload capability to launch satellites into orbit: the Atlas V, Delta IV, and the Falcon 9. The other active launch vehicles will follow in alphabetical order. www.AmericanSecurityProject.org 1100 New York Avenue, NW Suite 710W Washington, DC AMERICAN SECURITY PROJECT Atlas Launch Vehicle History and the Current Atlas V • Since its debut in 1957 as America’s first operational intercon- tinental ballistic missile (ICBM) designed by the Convair Divi- sion of General Dynamics, the Atlas family of launch vehicles has logged nearly 600 flights. • The missiles saw brief ICBM service, and the last squadron was taken off of operational alert in 1965. • From 1962 to 1963, Atlas boosters launched the first four Ameri- can astronauts to orbit the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Crew
    Table of Contents What is Commercial Crew? 3 Biographies 4 Crew 4 NASA 7 SpaceX 8 Astronaut Training 10 Commercial Crew Program Timeline 10 National Investment 12 SpaceX Missions 13 Demo-2 13 Crew-1 18 SpaceX Operations 19 Crew Dragon 19 Falcon 9 22 SpaceX Spacesuit 24 Launch Complex 39A 26 Ascent 28 Retrieving Crew Dragon 30 Safety and Innovation 31 Media Contacts 35 Multimedia 36 STEM Engagement 39 Working side-by-side with our two partners: What is Commercial Crew? NASA’s Commercial Crew Program is working with the American aerospace industry as companies develop and operate a new generation of spacecraft and launch systems capable of carrying crews to low-Earth orbit and the International Space Station. Commercial transportation to and from the station will provide expanded utility, additional research time and broader opportunities for discovery on the orbiting laboratory. The station is a critical testbed for NASA to understand and overcome the challenges of long- duration spaceflight. As commercial companies focus on providing human transportation services to and from low-Earth orbit, NASA is freed up to focus on building spacecraft and rockets for deep space missions. How is the Commercial Crew Program Different? The Commercial Crew Program represents a revolutionary approach to government and commercial collaborations for the advancement of space exploration. NASA's Prior Approach for Obtaining Crew Transportation Systems Since the Mercury program in the early 1960s, NASA has used an almost identical operating model to achieve its goals of human spaceflight. This includes the Space Shuttle Program and the American portions of the International Space Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Patricia Cooper's Testimony from Today
    STATEMENT OF PATRICIA COOPER VICE PRESIDENT, SATELLITE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (SPACEX) BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY UNITED STATES SENATE OCTOBER 25, 2017 Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Nelson, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for the opportunity to participate in today’s hearing. We appreciate the Committee’s interest in exploring how advanced satellite technologies can expand broadband access within the United States and the policies that would foster that capability. SpaceX also appreciates that the Committee recognizes the potential of a new generation of U.S.-based low-Earth orbit (“LEO”) or non-geostationary satellite orbit (“NGSO”) satellite broadband system as an integral part of any strategy to augment high-speed Internet connectivity nationwide. NGSO satellite constellations intend to leverage emerging technologies in space and on the ground to provide reliable, high-speed, and affordable broadband service to customers throughout the United States and abroad. SpaceX was founded in 2002 with the express goal of dramatically improving the reliability, safety, and affordability of space transportation. Today, SpaceX today is the world’s largest launch services provider, measured by missions under contract and cadence of launch, with 42 successful Falcon 9 launches, including 15 in 2017 alone. SpaceX has deployed over 65 commercial communications satellites since 2010. In addition to commercial satellite operators, SpaceX supports a diverse and growing set of satellite and space customers, including NASA, the Department of Defense, and allied international governments. We have signed contracts for nearly 70 missions on manifest, representing more than $10 billion. Under one of the most successful public-private programs ever undertaken with NASA, SpaceX also supports the Nation’s civil space program through routine cargo resupply missions with our Dragon spacecraft to the International Space Station (ISS).
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Rocket Motors
    Politecnico di Torino Facoltà di Ingegneria Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Aerospaziale Tesi di Laurea Magistrale Cabin Escape System: critical subsystems identification and separation subsystem design Relatori: Candidato: Fusaro Roberta Marco Palli Viola Nicole 16th October, 2018 Cabin Escape System: critical subsystems identification and separation subsystem design Marco Palli Acknowledgements Desidero innanzitutto ringraziare la Prof. Fusaro per avermi offerto una interes- santissima opportunità di tesi con la quale sono cresciuto sia come studente che come persona. La sua grande disponibilità e gentilezza mi hanno reso ancor più appassionato in quello che facevo. Ringrazio la Prof. Viola per avere accettato la proposta di studio. Ringrazio i miei referenti di DLR, Martin e Sven per avermi seguito nel mio lavoro e dai quali ho imparato molto. Ringrazio i miei carissimi genitori Renato e Maria Grazia, costantemente vicino a me (anche se per lunghi periodi non fisicamente), pronti a incoraggiarmi e sempre in grado di darmi una parola che mi rendesse orgoglioso. Grazie di tutto quello che avete fatto per me. Ringrazio la mia cara sorella Lucia anche lei sempre vicino a me e dalla quale ho tratto importanti consigli. Ringrazio mia nonna Eugenia che so essere molto orgogliosa di me. Ringrazio Andrés, vicino anche lui alla mia famiglia. Ringrazio i miei compagni di corso, in particolare Luca, Marco, Elio e Juan con cui ho instaurato un rapporto eccezionale e condiviso piacevoli momenti. Ringrazio i miei amici di Torino Alessandro B., Amaru “Kuco”, Gabriele, Matteo R., Matteo F., Enzino, Alessandro M., Marco P., Davide C., David, Francesco C., Francesco D., Filippo, Ema, Anna, Allegra, Barbara, Giulia, Giorgia, Sara B., Sara E., Romina e Valentina.
    [Show full text]