DOCSLIB.ORG

Firearms and the Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Firearms and the Law FIREARMS AND THE LAW JULY 2015 Rudi Fortson Q.C. 25 Bedford Row, London. WC1R 4HD Visiting Professor of Law, Queen Mary University of London This paper has been commissioned by the Law Commission for England and Wales. The paper is confined to those topics addressed by the Commission in its Scoping Paper. The analysis contained herein is that of the author and not of the Commission. 1 CONTENTS THE CASE FOR REFORM................................................................................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER 1: DEFINING A “FIREARM” ............................................................................................................................................. 9 I. BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 “FIREARM”: A MISNOMER?.......................................................................................................................................................... 9 LEGISLATION............................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Gun Licence Act 1870..................................................................................................................................................................................11 Pistols Act 1903...........................................................................................................................................................................................11 Firearms Act 1920.......................................................................................................................................................................................13 The Firearms and Imitation Firearms (Criminal Use) Act 1933 ...................................................................................................................14 The Firearms Act 1934 ................................................................................................................................................................................15 The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1936.........................................................................................................................................................15 The Firearms Act 1937 ................................................................................................................................................................................18 The Firearms Act 1965 ................................................................................................................................................................................18 The Firearms Act 1968 ................................................................................................................................................................................19 Air weapons...........................................................................................................................................................................................19 Prohibited weapons...............................................................................................................................................................................19 Firearms (Amendment) Act 1982................................................................................................................................................................20 The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988.........................................................................................................................................................21 Firearms (Amendment) Act 1992................................................................................................................................................................21 Firearms (Amendment) Act 1994................................................................................................................................................................21 The Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997.........................................................................................................................................................21 The Firearms (Amendment) No.2 Act 1997 ................................................................................................................................................22 The Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003............................................................................................................................................................22 Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006..............................................................................................................................................................23 Anti-social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014 ....................................................................................................................................23 II. BARREL THAT CAN DISCHARGE A MISSILE ............................................................................................................................ 23 “BARREL”.................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 “DISCHARGE”.............................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Discharge ineffective: defective barrels......................................................................................................................................................24 DEVICES NOT ‘LETHAL BARRELLED’ WITHOUT MODIFICATION ................................................................................................. 25 (1) From an imitation - to a firearm ........................................................................................................................................... 25 Cafferata v Wilson .................................................................................................................................................................................26 R v Freeman...........................................................................................................................................................................................27 Muir v Cassidy........................................................................................................................................................................................28 Kelly v MacKinnon .................................................................................................................................................................................28 The Firearms Act 1982 – readily convertible imitations .............................................................................................................................29 Overview................................................................................................................................................................................................29 Interpretation issues in respect of the 1982 Act ...................................................................................................................................30 When is an imitation firearm “readily convertible”?.............................................................................................................................32 How the 1982 Act came to end the Cafferata and Freeman approach ......................................................................................................33 R v Bewley..............................................................................................................................................................................................33 Bewley, the 1982 Act, and imitation prohibited weapons ....................................................................................................................34 Is an imitation that is not readily convertible, a “component part” of a firearm? ................................................................................35 The chequered history of convertible imitations........................................................................................................................................35 The Bewley ‘sting in the tail’..................................................................................................................................................................36 Divergence between the law of England and Scotland...............................................................................................................................36 (2) Whether a “firearm” can be made to work as a firearm ...................................................................................................... 37 Items that do not function: “designed or adapted” to function in a certain way.......................................................................................37 (a) R. v. Jobling......................................................................................................................................................................................37
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Licensing Act 2003 (C
    Licensing Act 2003 (c. 17) 1 SCHEDULE 1 – Provision of regulated entertainment Document Generated: 2021-09-13 Changes to legislation: Licensing Act 2003 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 13 September 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 Section 1 PROVISION OF REGULATED ENTERTAINMENT PART 1 GENERAL DEFINITIONS The provision of regulated entertainment 1 [F1(1) For the purposes of this Act, the “provision of regulated entertainment” means the provision of entertainment of a description falling within paragraph 2 where the conditions in sub-paragraphs (2) and (3) are satisfied.] (2) The first condition is that the entertainment is F2... provided— (a) to any extent for members of the public or a section of the public, (b) exclusively for members of a club which is a qualifying club in relation to the provision of regulated entertainment, or for members of such a club and their guests, or (c) in any case not falling within paragraph (a) or (b), for consideration and with a view to profit. [F3(3) The second condition is that the premises on which the entertainment is provided are made available for the purpose, or for purposes which include the purpose, of enabling the entertainment concerned to take place.] [F4(4) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (2)(c), entertainment is to be regarded as provided for consideration only if any charge— (a) is made by or on behalf of any person concerned in the organisation or management of that entertainment, and (b) is paid by or on behalf of some or all of the persons for whom that entertainment is provided.] (5) In sub-paragraph (4), “charge” includes any charge for the provision of goods or services.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups, Governance and the Development of UK Alcohol Policy: an Adversarial Policy Communities Approach
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Online Repository of Birkbeck Institutional Theses Groups, governance and the development of UK alcohol policy: An Adversarial Policy Communities Approach Gareth Paul Barrett A thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics Birkbeck, University of London January 2020 1 Declaration of Work I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of London is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. 2 Abstract The governance of UK alcohol policy looks like a textbook case of decision-making by a closed community of policymakers and industry insiders, but this thesis challenges this view. Drawing on Jordan and Richardson’s policy communities approach and Dudley and Richardson’s later work on adversarial policy communities, it examines the complex development of UK alcohol policy using archival sources, government and pressure group reports, news releases and historic media coverage going back over a century. The primary focus of this research is Westminster, but the importance of subnational policy communities is also considered through an examination of Scottish alcohol policy development. Through case studies of four key areas of UK alcohol policy – licensing, drink- driving, pricing and wider alcohol strategies – this thesis finds that the governance of UK alcohol policy is formed within policy communities, but ones that are much less closed and much more adversarial than traditionally thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups, Governance and the Development of UK Al- Cohol Policy: an Adversarial Policy Communities Ap- Proach
    ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Groups, governance and the development of UK al- cohol policy: an adversarial policy communities ap- proach https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40473/ Version: Full Version Citation: Barrett, Gareth Paul (2020) Groups, governance and the de- velopment of UK alcohol policy: an adversarial policy communities ap- proach. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Groups, governance and the development of UK alcohol policy: An Adversarial Policy Communities Approach Gareth Paul Barrett A thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics Birkbeck, University of London January 2020 1 Declaration of Work I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of London is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. 2 Abstract The governance of UK alcohol policy looks like a textbook case of decision-making by a closed community of policymakers and industry insiders, but this thesis challenges this view. Drawing on Jordan and Richardson’s policy communities approach and Dudley and Richardson’s later work on adversarial policy communities, it examines the complex development of UK alcohol policy using archival sources, government and pressure group reports, news releases and historic media coverage going back over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency
    International Law Research; Vol. 6, No. 1; 2017 ISSN 1927-5234 E-ISSN 1927-5242 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency Graham McBain1,2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: November 20, 2016 Accepted: February 19, 2017 Online Published: March 7, 2017 doi:10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1 1. INTRODUCTION Prior articles have asserted that English criminal law is very fragmented and that a considerable amount of the older law - especially the common law - is badly out of date.1 The purpose of this article is to consider the crime of public nuisance (also called common nuisance), a common law crime. The word 'nuisance' derives from the old french 'nuisance' or 'nusance' 2 and the latin, nocumentum.3 The basic meaning of the word is that of 'annoyance';4 In medieval English, the word 'common' comes from the word 'commune' which, itself, derives from the latin 'communa' - being a commonality, a group of people, a corporation.5 In 1191, the City of London (the 'City') became a commune. Thereafter, it is usual to find references with that term - such as common carrier, common highway, common council, common scold, common prostitute etc;6 The reference to 'common' designated things available to the general public as opposed to the individual. For example, the common carrier, common farrier and common innkeeper exercised a public employment and not just a private one.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 08 September 2021
    Changes to legislation: Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 08 September 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 2001 CHAPTER 16 An Act to make provision for combatting crime and disorder; to make provision about the disclosure of information relating to criminal matters and about powers of search and seizure; to amend the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, the Police and Criminal Evidence (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 and the Terrorism Act 2000; to make provision about the police, the National Criminal Intelligence Service and the National Crime Squad; to make provision about the powers of the courts in relation to criminal matters; and for connected purposes. [11th May 2001] Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 PROVISIONS FOR COMBATTING CRIME AND DISORDER CHAPTER 1 ON THE SPOT PENALTIES FOR DISORDERLY BEHAVIOUR Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Pt. 1 Ch. 1 extended (15.11.2003) by Police Reform Act 2002 (c. 30), ss. 38, 108, Sch. 4 para. 1(2)(a); S.I. 2003/2593, art. 2(d) C2 Pt. 1 Ch. 1 modified (26.12.2004) by The Penalties for Disorderly Behaviour (Amendment of Minimum Age) Order 2004 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackroyd, P. (1991). Charles Dickens. London: Methuen. Adams, E. (2011). Liberal Epic: The Victorian Practice of History from Gibbon to Churchill. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Aldous, R. (2007). The Lion and the Unicorn: Gladstone v Disraeli. London: Pimlico. Allan, T. (1993). Law, Liberty and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Allan, T. (2001). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Allison, J. (2007). The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Alter, R. (1968). The Demons of History in Dickens, Tale. Novel, 2, 135–142. Anderson, A. (2007). Trollope’s Modernity. ELH, 74, 509–534. Anderson, O. (1967). The Political Uses of History in Mid Nineteenth Century England. Past and Present, 36, 87–105. Arnold, M. (1968). Essays in Criticism. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Arnold, M. (1986). Matthew Arnold: A Critical Edition of the Major Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Arnold, M. (1993). Culture and Anarchy, and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Arnstein, W. (1962). Gladstone and the Bradlaugh Case. Victorian Studies, 5, 303–330. Arnstein, W. (2003). Queen Victoria. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Bagehot, W. (1965). The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot (St. John Stevas, Ed.). London: The Economist. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), 195 under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 I. Ward, Writing the Victorian Constitution, Palgrave Modern Legal History, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96676-2 196 BIBLIOGRAPHY Bagehot, W. (2001). The English Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Balfour, A. (1928).
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005
    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 2005 CHAPTER 15 An Act to provide for the establishment and functions of the Serious Organised Crime Agency; to make provision about investigations, prosecutions, offenders and witnesses in criminal proceedings and the protection of persons involved in investigations or proceedings; to provide for the implementation of certain international obligations relating to criminal matters; to amend the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002; to make further provision for combatting crime and disorder, including new provision about powers of arrest and search warrants and about parental compensation orders; to make further provision about the police and policing and persons supporting the police; to make provision for protecting certain organisations from interference with their activities; to make provision about criminal records; to provide for the Private Security Industry Act 2001 to extend to Scotland; and for connected purposes. [7th April 2005] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— F1 PART 1 THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY Textual Amendments F1 Pt. 1 omitted (7.10.2013) by virtue of Crime and Courts Act 2013 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Legislative Scrutiny of the Licensing Act 2003
    Memorandum to the House of Lords Select Committee Post-Legislative Scrutiny of the Licensing Act 2003 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty June 2016 Cm 9278 Memorandum to the House of Lords Select Committee Post-Legislative Scrutiny of the Licensing Act 2003 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty June 2016 Cm 9278 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open­ government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Drugs and Alcohol Unit Fry Building Home Office 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474134712 Web ISBN 9781474134729 ID 20061601 06/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office MEMORANDUM TO THE HOUSE OF LORDS SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE POST-LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY OF THE LICENSING ACT 2003 Contents 1. Introduction and Overall Approach ............................................................................ 4 2. Key Objectives ............................................................................................................. 5 3. Implementation .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Liability in Regulatory Contexts
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 195 CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN REGULATORY CONTEXTS A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Munby (Chairman), Professor Elizabeth Cooke, Mr David Hertzell, Professor Jeremy Horder and Miss Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is: Mr Mark Ormerod CB. Address for correspondence: Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London SW1H 9LJ. Topic of this consultation This consultation paper deals with the use of the criminal law in regulatory contexts, and with some aspects of corporate criminal liability. A summary of the main points can be found in Part 1. Scope of this consultation The purpose of this consultation is to generate responses to our provisional proposals. Geographical scope The contents of this consultation paper refer to the law of England and Wales. Impact assessment An impact assessment is included. Previous engagement N/A. Duration of the consultation We invite responses to our provisional proposals and questions from 25 August 2010 to 25 November 2010. How to respond Send your responses either – By email to: [email protected] OR By post to: address above. Tel: 020-3334-0271 / Fax: 020-3334-0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, whenever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format).
    [Show full text]
  • Judges and The
    Judges and the law 2 of 59 http://www.open.edu/openlearn/people-politics-law/the-law/judges-and-the-law/content-section-0?utm_source=openlearnutm_campaign=olutm_medium=ebook Friday 5 July 2019 About this free course This free course provides a sample of Level 1 study in Law www.open.ac.uk/courses/find/law. This version of the content may include video, images and interactive content that may not be optimised for your device. You can experience this free course as it was originally designed on OpenLearn, the home of free learning from The Open University – www.open.edu/openlearn/people-politics-law/the-law/judges-and-the-law/content-section-0 There you’ll also be able to track your progress via your activity record, which you can use to demonstrate your learning. The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA Copyright © 2016 The Open University Intellectual property Unless otherwise stated, this resource is released under the terms of the Creative Commons Licence v4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en_GB. Within that The Open University interprets this licence in the following way: www.open.edu/openlearn/about-openlearn/frequently-asked-questions-on-openlearn. Copyright and rights falling outside the terms of the Creative Commons Licence are retained or controlled by The Open University. Please read the full text before using any of the content. We believe the primary barrier to accessing high-quality educational experiences is cost, which is why we aim to publish as much free content as possible under an open licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Criminal Law Should Only Be 200 Years out of Date - and It Should Be Consolidated
    Review of European Studies; Vol. 6, No. 2; 2014 ISSN 1918-7173 E-ISSN 1918-7181 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Our Criminal Law Should Only Be 200 Years Out of Date - and It Should Be Consolidated Graham S McBain1, 2 1 Peterhouse, Cambridge, UK 2 Harvard Law School, USA Correspondence: Graham S McBain, 21 Millmead Terrace, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 4AT, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Received: January 16, 2014 Accepted: April 8, 2014 Online Published: May 27, 2014 doi:10.5539/res.v6n2p120 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n2p120 Abstract In a modern democracy such as we have, it is essential that English law be up-to-date and relevant. However, much English law is out of date and obsolete. This is especially so in the field of criminal law. The purpose of this article is to argue for the repeal of many old pieces of English criminal legislation and for the consolidation of the remainder. Keywords: criminal law, obsoletelegislation, repeal, consolidation 1. Introduction We live in a modern society with a deepening democracy. One in which the State is expected to justify - and is increasingly held accountable for - the proper expenditure of large sums of taxpayers’ money. We also live in a society where the general public expects the legal system - and the law - to be modern and up-to-date; not one that reflects the mores - and an imbalance of power in favour of the State - which existed centuries ago. After all, the public are paying for the legal system - the courts and the judges - and they are entitled to one which is accessible, free of obsolete law, with impartial and competent judges.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Long New.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-14734-7 - Religion and the Political Imagination Edited by Ira Katznelson and Gareth Stedman Jones Index More information Index Abdu¨lhamid II (Ottoman ruler), 104, European texts on toleration 105, 106, 107 influencing Jefferson during, 68 abortion quasi-religious roles of government Catholic Church on, 268 following, 78 in Europe after WWII, 327–8 questions of spiritual authority and, 179 European Court of Human Rights Analogy of religion (Butler), 144 rulings on, 308–9 ancient Rome. See classical world liberalisation of laws regarding, 271, 272 Anderson, Margaret Lavinia, 202 men involved in Christian organizations Anglicanism addressing, 293 autonomy and reforms sought in, 80–2 women’s autobiographies regarding, 284 disestablishment movement. See Acton, Lord, 46, 157 under nonconformist politics Adams, Jasper, 147 in 19th century Britain Adams, John, 136 as established state church in England, Adams, John Quincy, 142 298, 320 Adenauer, Conrad, 210, 324 female churchgoers, drop in, 292 affluence and secularism moralised politics, 19th century behavioural theory of, 316 demand for, 217 in the 1960s, 255, 256, 261–3, 264 national identity and, 84 Afghanistan, Taliban in, 1, 336 in the 1960s, 259, 260, 272–3 African Civilization Society, 217 political ruler’s place in governance The Age of reason (Paine), 15, 75, 86 of, 63, 79 agnosticism. See atheism/agnosticism statistics collected by, 73 Ahlener Programme (1947), Germany, women, ordination of, 292 210 Anglo-Jewish experience, 19, 46–69 Ahmed, Syed,
    [Show full text]