Silicon-Based Fertilizer Applications Have No Effect on the Reproduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HORTSCIENCE 44(6):1616–1621. 2009. and Ravensberg, 1992). Citrus mealybug is polyphagous, feeding on many horticultural crops such as Asparagus officinalis (L.), Silicon-based Fertilizer Applications Dizygotheca elegantissima (Hort. Veitch), Euphorbia pulcherrima (Willd. ex Klotzsch), Have No Effect on the Reproduction Impatiens walleriana (Hook. f.), Malus syl- vestris (L.), Musa sp.; Rosa sp., Epipremnum and Development of the Citrus aureum (Linden & Andre´), Codiaeum varie- gatum (L.), Aphelandra squarrosa Nees., Solenstemon scutellarioides (L.) Codd, and Mealybug, Planococcus citri Risso Ficus lyrata Warb. (Blumberg et al., 1995; Gray, 1953; MacGillivray, 1921; Malais and (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), Feeding Ravensberg, 1992; McKenzie, 1967; Williams and Watson, 1988). on Fiddleleaf Fig, Ficus lyrata (Warb.) Citrus mealybug populations are typically controlled with either contact or systemic Brian K. Hogendorp insecticides (Dreistadt, 2001; Hatting and University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Tate, 1997), which may quickly lower citrus Sciences, Urbana, IL 61801 mealybug populations to nondamaging levels and prevent future outbreaks from occurring Raymond A. Cloyd1 (Hudson et al., 1996; Pedigo, 2002; Peleg Kansas State University, Department of Entomology, 123 Waters Hall, and Bar-Zakay, 1995). However, managing Manhattan, KS 66506-4004 citrus mealybug populations exclusively with insecticides is difficult because the third John M. Swiader instar and adult females are covered with a University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental hydrophobic, nearly impervious waxy coat- ing that decreases penetration of contact Sciences, Urbana, IL 61801 insecticides through the cuticle, thus reducing Additional index words. pest management, interiorscapes, silicon, greenhouse, horticulture, efficacy (Copeland et al., 1985; McKenzie, potassium silicate 1967). As a result, routine applications of contact insecticides are needed early to Abstract. Mealybugs are major insect pests of greenhouses, interiorscapes, and conser- avoid extensive citrus mealybug population vatories feeding on a wide range of horticultural crops. However, mealybugs are difficult outbreaks. If not detected in time, a citrus to regulate with insecticides as a result of the presence of a nearly impervious protective mealybug infestation may result in the pres- waxy covering, which means that alternative management strategies are required. As ence of overlapping or simultaneous gener- such, this study was designed to determine the value of applying silicon-based fertilizers ations, thus making it difficult to manage such as potassium silicate to fiddleleaf fig, Ficus lyrata, plants as a means of alleviating citrus mealybug populations with insecti- outbreaks of the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri. The study evaluated the effects of cides, parasitoids, predators, lures, or traps. applying a commercially available silicon-based fertilizer product, ProTekÒ 0-0-3 The The consequences of relying explicitly on Silicon Solution, as a drench to the growing medium at different rates (0, 100, 400, 800, insecticides have led to an increased interest and 1600 ppm silicon). We determined the effect of the silicon-based fertilizer rate in implementing other management strate- treatments on citrus mealybug life history parameters, including number of eggs laid gies to deal with citrus mealybug populations by the female, body size (mm), and development time (days) from first instar to oviposit- (Hussey and Scopes, 1985). A potential strat- ing adult female. In addition, we used a plant alkaline fusion technique to assess the egy includes the appropriate use of fertilizers concentration (mgÁkg–1 or ppm) of silicon in the aboveground tissues (leaves and stems) of to prevent citrus mealybug population out- fiddleleaf fig plants at variable time intervals (days). This technique involves dry-ashing breaks (Fennah, 1959; Hogendorp et al., plant tissue in a muffle furnace followed by alkaline fusion and then colorimetric analysis. 2006). Furthermore, an analogous cultural We found that the silicon-based fertilizer rate treatments did not negatively affect any of practice involves applying supplemental fer- the citrus mealybug life history parameters measured. Citrus mealybug female egg load tilizers to enhance plant resistance to insect ranged from 132.3 to 159.2 and the development time (days) ranged from 66.9 to 68.7 d. pests (Rojanaridpiched et al., 1984). As such, The silicon concentrations present in the fiddleleaf fig plants on the final harvest date it has been suggested that applications of were between 4419.2 and 7241.7 mgÁkg–1 silicon with fiddleleaf fig plants that received the silicon may increase plant vigor and leaf 1600 ppm silicon-based fertilizer rate treatment having the highest silicon concentration. epidermal toughness. In addition, silicon Moisture content was not significantly different among plants receiving the different applications may act as an elicitor in triggering silicon concentrations. Our results seem to suggest that fiddleleaf fig may actually be a defensive processes in plants (Gomes et al., silicon ‘‘rejector’’ and, as such, applications of silicon-based fertilizers are not beneficial 2005; Heldt, 2005; Wadham and Parry, 1981). to fiddleleaf fig plants because they do not accumulate sufficient quantities of silicon to Citrus mealybugs have piercing–sucking impact citrus mealybugs. mouthparts, which are used to remove fluids from the phloem sieve tubes. Silicon-based fertilizer applications have been demon- Mealybugs are major insect pests of strated to inhibit the feeding of piercing– interior plantscape environments such as sucking insects (Salim and Saxena, 1992; greenhouses, interiorscapes, and conservato- Salim et al., 1990; Sogawa, 1982) and stem Received for publication 11 June 2009. Accepted ries feeding on a wide variety of horticultural borers (Djamin and Pathak, 1967; Nakano for publication 21 July 2009. plants (Blumberg and Van Driesche, 2001; et al., 1961; Sasamoto, 1961; Ukwungwu, We thank Dr. Yoonseong Park in the Department James, 1937; Kole and Hennekam, 1990; 1990). of Entomology at Kansas State University (Man- hattan, KS) for reviewing an initial draft of the McKenzie, 1967). The primary mealybug Currently, there is minimal quantitative manuscript. We also want to thank the five anon- species encountered in greenhouses and con- information associated with the use of silicon ymous reviewers for their contributions. servatories is the citrus mealybug, Planococ- in preventing outbreaks of insect and/or mite 1To whom reprint requests should be addressed; cus citri (Risso) (Barlett, 1978; Blumberg pests of dicot plants grown in greenhouses. A e-mail [email protected]. and Van Driesche, 2001; Cox, 1981; Malais number of studies have correlated increased 1616 HORTSCIENCE VOL. 44(6) OCTOBER 2009 PEST MANAGEMENT silicon content in monocot plants such as rice Facility at the University of Illinois (Urbana, five fiddleleaf fig plants from each treatment and maize (Zea mays L.) with enhanced IL) and placed on three (1.4 · 2.1. m) raised was harvested to determine the total silicon insect resistance (Djamin and Pathak, 1967; wire-mesh benches. The temperature inside concentration using the plant alkaline fusion Moore, 1984; Rojanaridpiched et al., 1984; the greenhouse was maintained at 24 ± 2 °C technique (Hogendorp, 2008). The mean Salim and Saxena, 1992; Salim et al., 1990; (day) and 22 ± 2 °C (night), and all plants values from the subset of plants were used Sharma and Chatterji, 1971; Sujatha et al., were subject to natural daylight conditions to establish a baseline silicon concentration 1987; Ukwungwu, 1990). Moreover, addi- with no supplemental lighting. (mgÁkg–1) of the fiddleleaf fig plants for each tional studies have correlated applications of Plants were irrigated with municipal treatment before artificially inoculating the silicon-based fertilizers (as growing medium water (Illinois American Water, Belleville, plants with first instar citrus mealybugs amendments or drenches) with increased IL) for 14 d with no supplemental fertilizer to through a coleus leaf disk procedure (de- insect resistance (Gomes et al., 2005; Moore, minimize transplant shock. On 5 Mar. 2008, scribed subsequently). At the conclusion of 1984; Se´tamou et al., 1993; Wadham and the fiddleleaf fig plants received an initial the study (7 July 2008), the remaining fid- Parry, 1981). However, relatively few studies fertilizer treatment without any supplemental dleleaf fig plants were harvested and pre- have assessed applications of silicon-based silicon added using Peter’sÒ 20N–8.8P– pared for total silicon analysis using the plant fertilizers to dicot horticultural plants as a 16.6K (Scotts-Sierra Horticultural Products, alkaline fusion technique. Harvest proce- means of reducing feeding by piercing– Marysville, OH) at 200 ppm nitrogen. dures were accomplished by excising the sucking insects (Hanisch, 1980; Moraes Twenty days later, on 25 Mar. 2008, all the plant stem at the level of the growing medium et al., 2005). It is possible that silicon-based plants received silicon treatments as po- and removing the aboveground plant parts fertilizer applications may impact insect tassium silicate (ProTekÒ 0-0-3 The Sili- (leaves and stems) and storing the plant tissue feeding, negatively affecting life history con Solution; Dyna-Gro Nutrient Solutions, in a #20 brown paper bag (Commercial Bag parameters such as development time, fecun- Richmond, CA),