CURRICULUM VITAE Erin Graff Zivin Professor of Spanish And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CURRICULUM VITAE Erin Graff Zivin Professor of Spanish And CURRICULUM VITAE Erin Graff Zivin Professor of Spanish and Portuguese and Comparative Literature Chair, Department of Comparative Literature Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and SCienCes University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-0358 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 213-740-7659 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Professor, Departments of Latin American and Iberian Cultures (formerly Spanish and Portuguese) and Comparative Literature, University of Southern California, December 2014 – present. Distinguished Visiting Professor, Department of Literature, University of California—San Diego, July 2020 – June 2021. Associate Professor, Departments of Spanish and Portuguese (March 2009 – December 2014) and Comparative Literature (September 2010 – December 2014), University of Southern California Assistant Professor, Department of Spanish and Portuguese, University of Southern California, August 2008 – March 2009. Assistant Professor, Department of Hispanic Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh, August 2004 – July 2008. EDUCATION New York University, New York, NY Ph.D. with Honors, Spanish and Portuguese, May 2004 University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA M.A., Comparative Literature and Latin American Studies, May 1998 University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA B.A. with Honors, Social Science (Literature and Religious Studies), May 1994 AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Modern Spanish American and Luso-Brazilian literature and media; Continental philosophy, deconstruction, critical theory; Ethics, politics, aesthetics; Literary representations of Jewishness and marranismo Graff Zivin CV Page 2 of 32 AWARDS AND HONORS 2021 Early Sabbatical Award, Advancing Scholarship in the Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Southern California 2020-2021 Distinguished Visiting Professor, Department of Literature, University of California—San Diego 2018 Raubenheimer Outstanding Faculty Award, University of Southern California 2013-2019 USC Del Amo Foundation Faculty Summer Research Grant 2015 Best Book prize for Figurative Inquisitions, Latin American Jewish Studies Association 2014 Advancing Scholarship in the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grant, University of Southern California 2013-2014 Visions and Voices Grant, University of Southern California 2013-2014 Casden Institute Faculty Research Grant, University of Southern California (declined) 2013 USC Shoah Foundation Institute Summer Research Fellowship (declined) 2012-2013 Advancing Scholarship in the Humanities and Social Sciences Grant Writing Mentorship Program, University of Southern California 2010-2011 Casden Institute Faculty Research Grant, University of Southern California 2010-2011 College Commons Course Enhancement Fund, University of Southern California 2007-2008 University Research Council Small Grants Program, University of Pittsburgh 2007 Center for Latin American Studies Faculty Research Grant, University of Pittsburgh 2005 Arts and Sciences Faculty Research and Scholarship Program, University of Pittsburgh 2003-2004 Dean’s Dissertation Fellowship, New York University 2003 Outstanding Teaching Award, College of Arts and Sciences, NYU PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Member, Executive Council, Modern Language Association, 2021-2025 Member, Nominations Committee, American Comparative Literature Association, 2021-present Graff Zivin CV Page 3 of 32 Member, “Post-foundational Contemporary Thought” Research Group (Ref. PID202-117069GB-100), Directed by Laura Llevadot, University of Barcelona, 2021-2023 Managing Editor, Women in Theory bibliography and book forum, 2020-present Founding Director, Women in Theory collective, 2018-present Member, “Historia y ontología del presente. La perspectiva hispana” Research Group (Ref. 941051), Directed by José Luis Villacañas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2018-present Member, Editorial Board, Coleción Euroamericana, Escolar y Mayo Editores, Madrid, Spain, 2018- present Co-Director, Seminario Crítico-Político Transnacional, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2014- present Member, Advisory Committee, PMLA, 2018-2021 Member, External Review Committee, Romance Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan, 2021 Member, Doctoral exam committee, Department of Hispanic Studies, University of California- Riverside, 2021 Member, External Review Committee, Department of Philosophy, Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación, Santiago, Chile, 2020 Advisory Board, “Mayo del 68/50 años después” International Conference. Facultad de Filosofía, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain, 2018 Judge, Modern Language Association Prize for a First Book, 2016 Member, External Review Committee, Comparative Literature, Emory University, 2016 Member, Advisory Board, “Populismo versus Republicanismo: Genealogía, Historia, Crítica.” Departamento de Historia de la Filosofía, Estética y Teoría del Conocimiento, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2016 Judge, Latin American Jewish Studies Association Dissertation Award, 2014-2015 Member, Program Committee, XVI International Research Conference, Latin American Jewish Studies Association, 2010-2011 Member, Elections Committee, Latin American Jewish Studies Association, 2009 Referee, Promotion to Full Professor, Stanford University, University of Toronto, CUNY, University of Michigan, University of San Diego, University of California, Irvine Graff Zivin CV Page 4 of 32 Referee, Promotion to Associate Professor, University of Warwick, UK, University of Michigan, University of Arizona, Dartmouth College Manuscript Reviewer, Bloomsbury, University of California Press, Fordham University Press, University of Pittsburgh Press, Palgrave Macmillan, Vanderbilt University Press, SUNY Press Referee, PMLA, Comparative Literature, Diacritics, Hispanic Review, Revista Hispánica Moderna, Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, Luso-Brazilian Review, Estudios: Revista de Investigaciones Literarias y Culturales, Journal of Jewish Identities WORK IN PROGRESS Transmedial Exposure. Book-length manuscript. (In preparation.) “Exposed: Levinas and Derrida in the Desert.” (In preparation.) “Transmedial Ekphrasis.” (In preparation.) “Fuera de la ley del género.” (In preparation.) “Sobre la naturaleza de las cosas de Lezra.” Special issue of Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, eds. Juan Leal Ugalde and Sergio Villalobos-Ruminott. (Under review.) BOOKS 6. Anarchaeologies: Reading as Misreading. New York: Fordham University Press, 2020. 192pp. Reviewed in: • Gonzalo Díaz Letelier, “Anarqueologías errantes, Borges disjunto y el perro yagán” Machina et subversio machinae (2020) • Kate Jenckes, “Presentación de Anarqueologías” Machina et subversio machinae blog (2020) • Derrida Today (forthcoming 2021) 6a. Anarqueologías: Ética y política de la lectura errada, trans. Jimena Jiménez Real. Buenos Aires: Editorial Prometeo, 2021 (in press). (Spanish translation of Anarchaeologies: Reading as Misreading) 5. Terror: La perspectiva hispana. Co-edited with Jacques Lezra, Alberto Moreiras, and José Luis Villacañas. Madrid, Spain: Guillermo Escolar, 2020. 4. The Marrano Specter: Derrida and Hispanism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017. 184pp. (Edited volume.) Reviewed in: Graff Zivin CV Page 5 of 32 • Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies (2020) • Comparative Literature Studies 56.3 (2019) • Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe 29.2 (2019) • Bulletin of Spanish Studies 96.8 (2019) 3. Figurative Inquisitions: Conversion, Torture, and Truth in the Luso-Hispanic Atlantic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2014. 174pp. (Winner of 2015 Award for Best Book, Latin American Jewish Studies Association) Reviewed in: • Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 52.1 (2018) • Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies 20 (2016) • A Contracorriente 13.3 (2016) • Latin American Literary Review 43.85 (2015) • Alberto Moreiras, “Zivin’s Spectral Injunction,” Infrapolitical Deconstruction Collective blog (2014) 3a. Inquisiciones Figurativas: Conversión, tortura, y verdad en el Atlántico Luso-Hispano, trans. Paola Cortes- Rocca. Buenos Aires: La Cebra, 2017. 228pp. (Revised and extended Spanish translation of Figurative Inquisitions) 2. The Wandering Signifier: Rhetoric of Jewishness in the Latin American Imaginary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008. 240pp. Reviewed in: • Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 46.1 (2012) • Comparative Literature Studies 48.2 (2011) • Luso-Brazilian Review 48.1 (2011) • Bulletin of Latin American Research 30.4 (2011) • Bulletin of Spanish Studies 88.2 (2011) • RILCE: Revista de Filología Hispánica 27.2 (2011) • Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana 36.72 (2010) • Revista Hispánica Moderna 63.2 (2010) • Hispanic Review 78.3 (2010) • Revista Iberoamericana 76.231 (2010) • Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe 21.2 (2010) • Shofar 28.2 (2010) • Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature (2010) • Latin American Review of Books (2009) • Chasqui; revista de literatura latinoamericana 38.2 (2009) 1. The Ethics of Latin American Literary Criticism: Reading Otherwise. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 235pp. (Edited volume.) Graff Zivin CV Page 6 of 32 Reviewed in: • Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 44.1 (2010) • Iberoamericana 38 (2010) • Luso-Brazilian Review 46.2 (2009) • Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies 13 (2009) DOSSIERS Guest editor, “Women in Theory.” Special issue of Diacritics 49.2 (2022). (In press.) Guest editor, “In Honor of Peggy Kamuf.” Special issue of Discourse: Journal for Theoretical Studies
Recommended publications
  • Ontology: Early Derrida Reading Early Heidegger
    Jake Nabasny ‘Beyond or Within’ Ontology: Early Derrida Reading Early Heidegger 0. Abstract The publication of Jacques Derrida’s 1964–5 seminar on Martin Heidegger marks a significant event. In these lectures, Derrida puts forth a heterodox reading of the project of fundamental ontology, claiming it is not and never was an ontological or metaphysical enterprise. This reading was intended to rescue Heideggerian Destruktion from the metaphysical lens contemporary scholars had placed it under. While this seminar reveals important insights into the origins of Derridian deconstruction, this paper argues that it ultimately gets Heidegger wrong. From a close reading of the Introduction of Being and Time and proximate lecture courses, I argue that Heidegger’s fundamental ontology is indebted to a phenomenological method that is thoroughly and explicitly ontological. Apart from setting the record straight about Heidegger, I show that this interpretation of Destruktion is inconsistent with Derrida’s reading of Heidegger before and after these lectures were presented. I conclude by tracing this inconsistency throughout Derrida’s later work and considering why the 1964–5 interpretation stands out. Ultimately, this seminar should be read as a stage in the development of Derrida’s mature thought, specifically in regard to the notion of différance. ‘This is a retroactive justification because these themes are only implicit in Sein und Zeit.’ (Derrida 2016, 73) 1. Introduction As Jacques Derrida’s seminars continue to be edited, translated, and published, interest in his oeuvre is constantly renewed. The latest addition to this collection is the 1964–5 seminar Heidegger: The Question of Being and History.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae PAUL LIVINGSTON Department of Philosophy MSC 03 2140 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001 [email protected] EMPLOYMENT Associate Professor, Philosophy, University of New Mexico EDUCATION Harvard University A.B. in Philosophy cum laude, June 1997 University of Cambridge M.Phil. in Philosophy, July 1998 Thesis: “Naturalism, Interpretation, and the Possibility of Alternative Conceptual Schemes: An Investigation of Davidson and McDowell” Thesis advisor: Dr. B. Jane Heal University of California, Irvine Ph.D. in Philosophy, June 2002 Dissertation: “Experience and Structure: An Investigation in the History of Philosophy of Mind” Director: Prof. David Woodruff Smith PUBLICATIONS Authored Books (sole author): Philosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness Cambridge University Press, 2004 (Paperback edition: 2009) Philosophy and the Vision of Language Routledge Press, 2008 (Paperback edition: 2010) The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism Routledge Press, 2011 1 Co-Authored Book (with Andrew Cutrofello): The Problems of Contemporary Philosophy: A Critical Guide for the Unaffiliated Polity Press, forthcoming, 2015 (under contract) Co-Edited Book (with Jeffrey Bell and Andrew Cutrofello): Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century Routledge Press, forthcoming, 2015 (under contract) Articles and Book Chapters: “Russellian and Wittgensteinian Atomism” Philosophical Investigations 24:1 (2001), pp. 30-54 “Experience and Structure: Philosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness” Journal of Consciousness Studies 9:3 (2002), pp. 15-34 “Husserl and Schlick on the Logical Form of Experience” Synthese 132:2 (2002), pp. 239-72 “Thinking and Being: Heidegger and Wittgenstein on Machination and Lived- Experience” Inquiry 46:3 (2003), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • MARTIN HÄGGLUND Website
    MARTIN HÄGGLUND Website: www.martinhagglund.se APPOINTMENTS Birgit Baldwin Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities, 2021- Chair of Comparative Literature, Yale University, 2015- Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities, Yale University, 2014- Tenured Associate Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities, Yale University, 2012-2014 Junior Fellow, Society of Fellows, Harvard University, 2009-2012 DEGREES Ph.D. Comparative Literature, Cornell University, 2011 M.A. Comparative Literature, emphasis in Critical Theory, SUNY Buffalo, 2005 B.A. General and Comparative Literature, Stockholm University, Sweden, 2001 PUBLICATIONS Books This Life: Secular Faith and Spiritual Freedom, Penguin Random House: Pantheon 2019: 465 pages. UK and Australia edition published by Profile Books. *Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Chinese, Korean, Macedonian, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish translations. *Winner of the René Wellek Prize. *Named a Best Book of the Year by The Guardian, The Millions, NRC, and The Sydney Morning Herald. Reviews: The New Yorker, The Guardian, The New Republic, New York Magazine, The Boston Globe, New Statesman, Times Higher Education (book of the week), Jacobin (two reviews), Booklist (starred review), Los Angeles Review of Books, Evening Standard, Boston Review, Psychology Today, Marx & Philosophy Review of Books, Dissent, USA Today, The Believer, The Arts Desk, Sydney Review of Books, The Humanist, The Nation, New Rambler Review, The Point, Church Life Journal, Kirkus Reviews, Public Books, Opulens Magasin, Humanisten, Wall Street Journal, Counterpunch, Spirituality & Health, Dagens Nyheter, Expressen, Arbetaren, De Groene Amsterdammer, Brink, Sophia, Areo Magazine, Spiked, Die Welt, Review 31, Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, Reason and Meaning, The Philosopher, boundary 2, Critical Inquiry, Radical Philosophy. Journal issues on the book: Los Angeles Review of Books (symposium with 6 essays on the book and a 3-part response by the author).
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Derrida Law As Absolute Hospitality
    JACQUES DERRIDA LAW AS ABSOLUTE HOSPITALITY JACQUES DE VILLE NOMIKOI CRITICAL LEGAL THINKERS Jacques Derrida Jacques Derrida: Law as Absolute Hospitality presents a comprehensive account and understanding of Derrida’s approach to law and justice. Through a detailed reading of Derrida’s texts, Jacques de Ville contends that it is only by way of Derrida’s deconstruction of the metaphysics of presence, and specifi cally in relation to the texts of Husserl, Levinas, Freud and Heidegger, that the reasoning behind his elusive works on law and justice can be grasped. Through detailed readings of texts such as ‘To Speculate – on Freud’, Adieu, ‘Declarations of Independence’, ‘Before the Law’, ‘Cogito and the History of Madness’, Given Time, ‘Force of Law’ and Specters of Marx, de Ville contends that there is a continuity in Derrida’s thinking, and rejects the idea of an ‘ethical turn’. Derrida is shown to be neither a postmodernist nor a political liberal, but a radical revolutionary. De Ville also controversially contends that justice in Derrida’s thinking must be radically distinguished from Levinas’s refl ections on ‘the Other’. It is the notion of absolute hospitality – which Derrida derives from Levinas, but radically transforms – that provides the basis of this argument. Justice must, on de Ville’s reading, be understood in terms of a demand of absolute hospitality which is imposed on both the individual and the collective subject. A much needed account of Derrida’s infl uential approach to law, Jacques Derrida: Law as Absolute Hospitality will be an invaluable resource for those with an interest in legal theory, and for those with an interest in the ethics and politics of deconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Hermeneutics and Citation in Philosophy, Asphodel and Alan Rickman, Bruno Latour and the ‘Science Wars Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected]
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Philosophy Collections Summer 2017 Are They Good? Are They Bad? Double Hermeneutics and Citation in Philosophy, Asphodel and Alan Rickman, Bruno Latour and the ‘Science Wars Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, Epistemology Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Babich, Babette, "Are They Good? Are They aB d? Double Hermeneutics and Citation in Philosophy, Asphodel and Alan Rickman, Bruno Latour and the ‘Science Wars" (2017). Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections. 78. https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich/78 This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Babette Babich Are They Good? Are They Bad? Double Hermeneutics and Citation in Philosophy, Asphodel and Alan Rickman, Bruno Latour and the ‘Science Wars’ 1. Redoubling Ginev’s Double Hermeneutics I have had the privilege of knowing Dimitri Ginev for several years. The late physicist and philosopher, Patrick Aidan Heelan was one of the first to tell me about the brilliance of Ginev’s work since their own encounter at the
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Barad When Two Hands Touch, There Is a Sensuality of the Flesh
    On Touching – The Inhuman That Therefore I Am (v1.1) Preliminary Note: This paper is Karen Barad a slightly revised version of the original paper “On Touching – The Inhuman that Therefore I Am,” which was published in differences 23:3 (2012, p. 206-223). That paper unfortunately included errors result- ing from a misreading my proof cor- rections. I am thankful that Susanne Witzgall and Kerstin Stakemeier has provided an opportunity for this arti- cle to be printed in its correct form. It also includes minor revisions to reset the introduction of the paper since it is now being published in a different forum and no longer intro- duces a journal special issue, which was the original context. 1 The title of my essay here expresses my virtual engagements and entanglements with Jacques Derrida. I am indebted to Astrid Schrader and Vicki Kirby for putting me in touch with Derrida through their marvellous materialist readings of his work. 2 Touch has been an object of study for centuries, going back at least to Aristotle’s momentous work on this topic. Part of what is at stake in this essay, is joining with other feminist and postcolonial theorists in troubling the notion of touch as an innocent form of engagement and also, by implication, troubling its positioning in the history of philosophy as a mutually consent- ing act between individuals, free When two hands touch, there is a sensuality of the flesh, an exchange of culture, history, and politics. of warmth, a feeling of pressure, of presence, a proximity of other- The literature on this is extensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae María Del Rosario Acosta López
    Curriculum Vitae María del Rosario Acosta López Associate Professor of Philosophy DePaul University 2352 N Clifton, Chicago, IL 60614 [email protected] RESEARCH INTERESTS AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Romanticism and German Idealism (esp. Schiller and Hegel) Continental European Political Philosophy (esp. French and Italian) Decolonial Studies and Latin American Philosophy AREAS OF COMPETENCE Continental European Philosophy (19th-20th Centuries) Transitional Justice Trauma and Memory Studies Latinx Feminism PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor of Philosophy, DePaul University, 2014-Present Guest Researcher, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, 2013-2014 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Universidad de los Andes, 2010-2014 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Universidad de los Andes, 2007-2010 EDUCATION Universidad Nacional de Colombia, PhD. in Philosophy (Summa Cum Laude), 2003-2007 Visiting Scholar, Department of Philosophy, Boston College, Fall 2005 Visiting Scholar, Department of Philosophy, Boston College, Fall 2004 Universidad Nacional de Colombia, MA in Philosophy, 2002-2003 Universidad de los Andes. BA in Philosophy (Graduated with Honors), 1997-2002 Universidad de Barcelona, Fall 1999 Universität Wien, 1998-1999 María del Rosario Acosta López LANGUAGES Spanish and English: full fluency German: semi-fluency French and Italian: reading proficiency Greek: basic reading proficiency GRANTS AND AWARDS Steans Community Research-based Fellowship, DePaul University, 2018-2019 Rauschenberg Foundation,
    [Show full text]
  • Ethos of Diffraction: New Paradigms for a (Post)Humanist Ethics Kathrin
    This is an Author’s Original Manuscript of an article published in special issue ‘Diffracted Worlds, Diffractive Reading: Onto-Epistemologies and the Critical Humanities’ (eds. B Kaiser and K Thiele) Parallax, 20:3 (issue 72): 202-216 (DOI: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927627) [to quote, please consult the published version] Ethos of Diffraction: New Paradigms for a (Post)humanist Ethics Kathrin Thiele …the very house of difference rather [than] the security of any one particular difference. Audre Lorde Zami.1 How to live a world of difference(s), a world in/as ongoing differentiation, in such ways that the outcome is not ever more separation and antagonism, exclusion and the fear of others, but so that new senses of commonality are envisioned? This article takes up this broad ethico- political (and to certain extents also insistingly human(ist)) quest for alternative worldly enactments, which I feel with contemporary urge on a planetary scale. Two issues seem at stake today when we approach this question of difference(s) and differentiality from such an ethico-political perspective: on the one hand, there seems to be an ever increasing sense of what can be called a post-secular awareness that ‘world’ is nothing but (dis)continuous differentiation, and that, thus, ‘we’ – and this article will be specifically concerned with the engagement of such ‘we’ – will not find any unambiguously ‘good’ alternative or ‘secure’ universal ground that is not always/already implicated in the unequal power relations constituting everything; and, on the other hand – and maybe as a consequence of such awareness – ‘we’ cannot not notice in our daily experiences the ubiquity of difference(s) played out globally as increasing inequalities and processes of exclusion, instigating frightening renewals of xeno- and other phobic anxieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Tytuł 1 Issn E-Issn Tytuł 2 Issn E-Issn Punkty AMERICAN JOURNAL of BIOETHICS 1526-5161 1536-0075 American Journal of Bioethics
    Tytuł 1 issn e-issn Tytuł 2 issn e-issn Punkty AMERICAN JOURNAL OF American Journal of 1526-5161 1536-0075 1526-5161 1536-0075 200 BIOETHICS Bioethics ANALYSIS 0003-2638 1467-8284 Analysis 0003-2638 1467-8284 200 Argumentation 0920-427X 1572-8374 Argumentation 0920-427X 200 AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF Australasian Journal of 0004-8402 1471-6828 0004-8402 200 PHILOSOPHY Philosophy BIOETHICS 0269-9702 1467-8519 Bioethics 0269-9702 1467-8519 200 BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE British Journal for the 0007-0882 1464-3537 0007-0882 1464-3537 200 PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Philosophy of Science BRITISH JOURNAL OF 0007-0904 1468-2842 British Journal of Aesthetics 0007-0904 1468-2842 200 AESTHETICS CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY 0278-6656 Classical Antiquity 0278-6656 1067-8344 200 HISTORY AND THEORY 0018-2656 1468-2303 History and Theory 0018-2656 200 International Theory: A International Theory 1752-9719 1752-9727 Journal of International 1752-9719 200 Politics, Law and Philosophy Journal of Mathematical Journal of Mathematical Logic 0219-0613 1793-6691 0219-0613 200 Logic JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY 0022-362X 1939-8549 The Journal of Philosophy 0022-362X 1939-8549 200 JOURNAL OF POLITICAL Journal of Political 0963-8016 1467-9760 0963-8016 1467-9760 200 PHILOSOPHY Philosophy Journal of Semantics 0167-5133 1477-4593 Journal of Semantics 0167-5133 200 JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC 0022-4812 1943-5886 Journal of Symbolic Logic 0022-4812 200 JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF Journal of the History of 0022-5037 1086-3222 0022-5037 1086-3222 200 IDEAS Ideas JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF Journal
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Derrida on the Reality of Universals Joshua Anderson and Hikari Ishido
    201712/12 DISCUSSION PAPERS Jacques Derrida on the Reality of Universals Joshua Anderson and Hikari Ishido Jacques Derrida on the Reality of Universals Joshua Anderson and Hikari Ishido 1. Introduction Jacques Derrida (1930-2004), an influential anti-realist, uncovers the underlying assumptions of Western philosophy since Ancient Greece, and contends that its premise cannot be maintained. He thought Western philosophy is “impossible” since it presumes the reality of universal that is the objective of all the foundations or all processes, such as idea (Plato), God (Augustine), Cogito (Descartes), and absolute spirit (Hegel). This short paper addresses the way Derrida made his case against the reality of universals and discusses its consequence in society. Section 2 introduces his deconstruction thesis in connection to the reality of universals. Section 3 addresses the impact of his deconstruction on the contemporary society. Section 4 briefly discusses the significance of Derrida’s philosophy on written texts and the Christian doctrine. Section 5 concludes this paper. 2. Deconstruction and the reality of universals Derrida calls such existence “existence - God - purpose - theory of origin” in his seminal Of Grammatology (Derrida, 1974 and 1978). These are indeed the starting assumptions of Western philosophy. The philosophical premises of existence - God - purpose - theory of origin and so on all have a feature of dichotomous relationship: “essence (as idea) / appearance (as particular)” and “ego / subject”. The two dichotomous things are not equal to each other. For example, Plato decided that an idea would be established by Idea. And the 1 201712/12 DISCUSSION PAPERS Jacques Derrida on the Reality of Universals Joshua Anderson and Hikari Ishido dichotomous conflict represents a hierarchy in which one is superior to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Morin, Marie-Eve
    Morin, Marie-Eve 2-65 Assiniboia Hall Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB T6G2E7 Canada [email protected] AOS: 20th-century Continental Philosophy (Phenomenology, Existentialism, Poststructuralism, Deconstruction, Postmodernism) AOC: Social and Political Philosophy, Ancient Philosophy, Ethics, Philosophy of Religion ▪ ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2018- Professor (as of July 2018) Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, Edmonton 2013-2018 Associate Professor (tenured) Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. 2007-2013 Assistant Professor (tenure-track) Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. 2005-2007 Assistant Professor (non-tenure-track) Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg. 2003-2004 Adjunct Faculty in Philosophy (part-time) Suffolk County Community College, Eastern Campus, Riverhead, NY, USA. ▪ EDUCATION 1999-2005 Grundständige Promotion (Dr. Phil.) Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Germany Dissertation: Die Frage nach der Gemeinschaft im Denken von Jacques Derrida und Jean-Luc Nancy. June 2005 Rigorosum (PhD Oral Examination) Topics: Soul and City in Plato’s Republic, Substance in Descartes, Existentialist Ethics in Sartre and Beauvoir, The Sublime in Kant and Lyotard 1996-1999 Bachelor of Arts with First Class Honours in Philosophy McGill University, Montréal, Canada ▪ ADDITIONAL FORMATION 2015-2016 Gold College, Comprehensive Leadership Development Program (Office of the Provost and VP (Academic) in partnership with Human Resource Services, University of Alberta) Winter 2012 Auditor, Cressida Heyes’s PHIL-594: Introduction to Contemporary Feminist Philosophy July 2010 Deleuze and Guatarri Summer School, “Kafka and the Perspective of the Minority,” Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. March 2010 Visiting Researcher (Chercheur visiteur), Centre d’études phénoménologiques, Université catholique de Louvain-la-neuve, Belgium 2002-2004 Visiting Student, Stony Brook University, NY, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Norris: Derrida, Badiou, and the Formal Imperative
    Christopher Norris: Derrida, Badiou and the Formal Imperative. Continuum, 2012. 197+vii pp. Reviewed by Paul M. Livingston, University of New Mexico I Do “we” need, today, a rapprochement between analytic and “continental” philosophy? If so, from what philosophical and critical imperatives does such a need arise, and to what kinds of actual problems, political and social as well as theoretical, should it respond? Might giving a critical response to contemporary social and political problems require remapping familiar division lines between the analytic and continental traditions, sometimes in ways that will initially appear surprising and unfamiliar to those convinced of the legitimacy of the old traditional boundaries? To what extent might this require a creative rethinking of the boundaries and structural implications of formalism and of the kind of formalizing project so characteristic of one strand of the analytic tradition? And who might be the “we” (mentioned in the first question) that could emerge from such a critical remapping of methodological and thematic territories, as inheritors of the legacy of both traditions in twentieth century philosophy and practitioners of a new kind of philosophy drawing on the best resources of both? These are some of the questions raised by Christopher Norris’s useful and potentially important book, Derrida, Badiou and the Formal Imperative. In particular, Norris makes the heterodox but ultimately convincing argument that the work of two of the most important contemporary and recent “continental” philosophers, Jacques Derrida and Alain Badiou, responds in both cases to a “formal” imperative by developing the implications of classical formal and logical structures to the “breaking point” of structurally inherent aporias and paradoxes.
    [Show full text]