DOCSLIB.ORG

Charles Darwin and Selection As a Cause of Adaptive Evolution 1837

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charles Darwin and Selection As a Cause of Adaptive Evolution 1837 Charles Darwin Carl Jay Bajema is professor and Selection of biology at Grand Valley State College, Allendale, MI 49401. He teaches introducto- ry biology, human ecology, as a Cause of human genetics, and human sexuality in the Department *- x *l of Biology, and a course on / the Darwinian revolution in Adaptive the History of Science program. Bajemaeamed a Ph.D. in zoolo- gy from Michigan State Univ. in 1963. Bajemahas served as Sen- ior Population Council Fellow in demography and population ge- netics at the Uiiiv. of Chicago (1966-1967);as researchassociate in Evolution population studies at HarvardUniv. (1967-1972);as researchasso- ciate in biology at the Univ. of California, Santa Barbara(1974); at Har- and most recently as visiting professor of anthropology Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/47/4/226/86148/4448024.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 vard Univ. (1974-1975).His research interests have concentrated 1 837-1 859 on estimating the direction and intensity of naturalselection espe- cially in human behavior and on the history of ideas on evolution. He is coauthor of an introductory college biology textbook. Ba- CarlJay Bajema jema has edited four volumes of benchmarkpapers. Charles Darwin triggered a scientific revolution in win (1958 p. 68) wrote that these two books "stirred 1859 when he contended that species have under- up in me a burning zeal to add even the most hum- gone "descent with modification"-evolution, and ble contribution to the noble structure of science." that selection operating on heritable variations in in- Darwin's enthusiasm for science was cultivated by dividuals was the primary cause of adaptive evolu- Professor Henslow who made arrangements for Dar- tion. Valuable knowledge can be gained about the win to accompany the geologist Adam Sedgwick on processes of scientific discovery and the justification a 1831 field trip to Wales. Sedgwick's views on sci- of scientific theories by studying the methodologies ence led Darwin (1958 p. 70) to conclude that "sci- employed by Charles Darwin in his search for the ence consists in grouping facts so that general laws causes of evolution and in his subsequent advocacy or conclusions may be drawn from them." and defense of adaptive evolution by selection theo- ry. Charles Darwin's personal scientific diaries, The Voyage of the H.M.S. Beagle notebooks, correspondence, and publications have enabled scholars to reconstruct much of the logic and the Impactof CharlesLyell Charles Darwin employed to solve scientific prob- Charles Darwin accepted an opportunity to serve lems. as a naturalist aboard the H.M.S. Beagle and took the first volume of Charles Lyell's recently published Darwin'sFormal and InformalEducation Principlesof Geologyalong on the voyage. Lyell used Charles Darwin's interest in natural history dates the uniformity of causes principle-the theory that back to his childhood passion for collecting spec- present causes now in operation are sufficient to ex- imens of rocks, insects, birds, and other species. plain past changes-to scientifically interpret the Darwin learned how to collect, preserve and de- geological history of the earth. Darwin concluded scribe species scientifically while he was a student that Lyell's naturalistic uniformity of causes princi- studying medicine at Edinburgh. While Darwin ple rather than geological catastrophism provided studied for the ministry at Cambridge, he pursued the best theory for interpreting the geological obser- his interest in natural history with John Henslow, vations that Darwin was making on the voyage professor of botany. Darwin also read the works of (Darwin 1958 p. 77). The tremendous impact that Bishop Paley including NaturalTheology which cham- Lyell's uniformity of causes scientific problem solv- pioned the religious argument from design (adapta- ing method had on Darwin's thinking was empha- tion) in nature to the existence and attributes of sized by Darwin in an 1844 letter: God. ... the whole merit of the Principleswas that it al- During his last year at Cambridge, Charles Dar- tered the whole tone of one's mind and, therefore, win read John Herschel's 1830 book on the philoso- that when seeing a thing never seen by Lyell, one yet saw it partially though his eyes [and confessed that] I phy of science, A PreliminaryDiscourse on the Studyof always feel as if my books came half out of Sir Natural Philosophyand Alexander von Humboldt's Charles Lyell's brain . .. (Darwin and Seward 1903, PersonalNarrative of Travels.In his AutobiographyDar- II, p. 117). 226 THE AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, VOLUME 47, NO. 4, APRIL 1985 The impact of Charles Lyell on the biological ideas including those that led him to construct his theory Charles Darwin explored while on the voyage has of "descent with modification" by natural, sexual, been analyzed by Hodge (1983). and artificialselection. In his Autobiography,Charles Charles Darwin made field observations and col- Darwin (1958 p. 119) contended that when he was lected the fossil remains of extinct animal species in trying to identify the natural processes which gener- addition to capturing and preserving specimens of ated evolution he "worked on true Baconian princi- numerous contemporary species during his many ples [inductive logic], and without any theory col- expeditions in South America and the Galapagos Is- lected facts on a wholesale scale, more especially lands. The geological and biogeographical observa- with respect to domesticated productions . tions which Darwin made while on the voyage con- However, the scholars who have analyzed the con- cerning the distribution of species through time and tents of Darwin's four Notebookson Transmutation space ultimately led young Darwin to seriously have concluded that, contrary to his recollection, question the religious doctrine of separate creations Darwin employed and tested a number of theories and to begin testing the deductions of the theory in his search for the natural processes generating that contemporary species are the products of evolu- evolution (Gruber 1974; Schweber 1977; Kohn 1980). tion. However, Darwin did not begin thinking of Darwin even made an entry in his NotebookD stating species as the products of evolution while he ex- that he was employing deductive logic to test the Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/47/4/226/86148/4448024.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 plored the Galapagos Islands 150 years ago (Sept 16- theories of evolution he was considering: Oct 20, 1835) (Sulloway 1982a, 1982b; Mayr 1982; The line of argumentoften pursuedthroughout my Gould 1984). theoryis to establisha point as a probabilityby in- Soon after his return to England, Darwin loaned duction,& to apply it as hypothesesto otherpoints, his collections of birds and mammals to other scien- & see whetherit will solve them (Darwin[1838], p. tists to study, and concentrated on writing up the D117). geology of the voyage of the HMS Beagle. The com- Charles Lyell's comprehensive review of the argu- parative anatomist Richard Owen concluded that ments for and against the transmutation of species virtually all of Darwin's fossil mammals were extinct in the first and subsequent editions of ThePrinciples larger versions of the smaller mammals-llamas, of Geologywhich Darwin read for a second time dur- sloths, armadillos-that presently inhabit South ing the Spring of 1837 provided young Darwin with America. The ornithologist John Gould informed numerous theories to test. Darwin's notebooks are Darwin in March 1838 that virtually all the Ga- full of deductions from theories that he tested lapagos Islands land birds in Darwin's collection against observations made by others or by himself. were found only in the Galapagos; their closest rela- Ratherthan working solely by induction Darwin em- tives were found in South America. Gould also told ployed "multiple working hypotheses" in his search Darwin that the Galapagos Islands finches con- for the natural processes that cause adaptive evolu- stituted an unique genus which also included two tion. Darwin tested and rejected such theories as the species-a "wren" and an "oriole" that Darwin had production of adaptations by the "willing" of organ- mistakenly identified as representatives of species isms and the life of a species being fixed and analo- they appeared to mimic (Sulloway 1984). gous to the life cycle of an individual organism. Lyell also made Darwin acutely aware of the Searchingfor the NaturalCauses of Evolution "struggle for existence" as a force in nature by championing its importance as a cause of the extinc- The expert judgments of Gould and Owen con- tion of many species. However, Lyell rejectedevolu- cerning the taxonomic relationships of Darwin's tion primarilybecause he was unable to identify any specimens triggered a revolution in Darwin's think- cause now acting that was powerful enough to have ing leading him to consider seriously the possibility brought about evolution. that species have undergone descent with modifica- tion from common ancestors. This led Darwin to re- Analogy Between ArtificialSelection cord a few ideas concerning speciation in his Red and NaturalSelection Notebook(Darwin 1980), and to open a series of Note- bookson Transmutationof Species(Darwin 1960-67)in Nonetheless it was Charles Lyell who started which he recorded "any facts that might bear on the young Darwin on the pathway to scientific discovery question." of selection as a powerful cause of adaptive evolu- The entries that Charles Darwin made in his trans- tion. Lyell drew Darwin's attention to a possible mutation notebooks between July 1837 and June analogy between the selective breeding of domesti- 1839 have enabled scholars to reconstruct many of cated species and processes operating in nature: the intellectual ideas Darwin explored in his search The best authenticated examples of the extent to for the causes of adaptation and the origin of species which species can be made to vary, may be looked CHARLES DARWIN & SELECTION 227 for in the historyof domesticatedanimals and culti- marized Comte's contention that scientists possess a vated plants...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interpreting the History of Evolutionary Biology Through a Kuhnian Prism: Sense Or Nonsense?
    Interpreting the History of Evolutionary Biology through a Kuhnian Prism: Sense or Nonsense? Koen B. Tanghe Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Belgium Lieven Pauwels Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social Law, Universiteit Gent, Belgium Alexis De Tiège Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Belgium Johan Braeckman Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Belgium Traditionally, Thomas S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is largely identified with his analysis of the structure of scientific revo- lutions. Here, we contribute to a minority tradition in the Kuhn literature by interpreting the history of evolutionary biology through the prism of the entire historical developmental model of sciences that he elaborates in The Structure. This research not only reveals a certain match between this model and the history of evolutionary biology but, more importantly, also sheds new light on several episodes in that history, and particularly on the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859), the construction of the modern evolutionary synthesis, the chronic discontent with it, and the latest expression of that discon- tent, called the extended evolutionary synthesis. Lastly, we also explain why this kind of analysis hasn’t been done before. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive review, as well as the editor Alex Levine. Perspectives on Science 2021, vol. 29, no. 1 © 2021 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00359 1 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/posc_a_00359 by guest on 30 September 2021 2 Evolutionary Biology through a Kuhnian Prism 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Quiet Debut'' of the Double Helix: a Bibliometric and Methodological
    Journal of the History of Biology Ó Springer 2009 DOI 10.1007/s10739-009-9183-2 Revisiting the ‘‘Quiet Debut’’ of the Double Helix: A Bibliometric and Methodological note on the ‘‘Impact’’ of Scientific Publications YVES GINGRAS De´partement d’histoire Universite´ du Que´bec a` Montre´al C.P. 8888, Suc. Centre-Ville Montreal, QC H3C-3P8 Canada E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The object of this paper is two-fold: first, to show that contrary to what seem to have become a widely accepted view among historians of biology, the famous 1953 first Nature paper of Watson and Crick on the structure of DNA was widely cited – as compared to the average paper of the time – on a continuous basis from the very year of its publication and over the period 1953–1970 and that the citations came from a wide array of scientific journals. A systematic analysis of the bibliometric data thus shows that Watson’s and Crick’s paper did in fact have immediate and long term impact if we define ‘‘impact’’ in terms of comparative citations with other papers of the time. In this precise sense it did not fall into ‘‘relative oblivion’’ in the scientific community. The second aim of this paper is to show, using the case of the reception of the Watson–Crick and Jacob–Monod papers as concrete examples, how large scale bibliometric data can be used in a sophisticated manner to provide information about the dynamic of the scientific field as a whole instead of limiting the analysis to a few major actors and generalizing the result to the whole community without further ado.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Botany in the United States</Article
    would have extended the value of the classes (the chapter on plant ecology book to the layman, the high school to my environmental biology class, for ScienceFilmstrips biology student, and even the elemen- example) in order to give students a tary-school child. fine historical overview of the particu- R. E. Barthelemy lar discipline's development in this BIOLOGY CHEMISTRY University of Minnesota country. Meanwhile I read the book PHYSICS MICROBIOLOGY Minneapolis piecemeal myself for biohistorical ap- ATOMICENERGY preciation and background; it shouldn't at one sit- ATOMICCONCEPT be read from cover to cover HISTORYAND PHILOSOPHY ting! HOWTO STUDY Never before has such a fund of di- on American botani- GENERALSCIENCE A SHORT HISTORY OF BOTANY IN THE UNITED verse information in FIGURE DRAWING STATES, ed. by Joseph Ewan. 1969. cal endeavor been brought together LABORATORYSAFETY Hafner Publishing Co., N.Y. 174 pp. one handy volume. We might hope that American zoologists, undaunted by HEALTHAND SAFETY(Campers) Price not given. Engelmann of St. having been upstaged, can shortly man- SAFETYIN AN ATOMICATTACK In 1846 George Louis, after finally receiving some fi- age to compile a comparable volume SCHOOLBUS SAFETY nancial encouragement for the pursuit for their discipline. BICYCLESAFETY of botany in the American West, opti- Richard G. Beidleman Colorado College mistically wrote that he could "hope a Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/32/3/178/339753/4442993.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 WATERCONSERVATION Springs little more from this country for sci- Colorado ence." Today, Engelmann would be de- CARL LINNAEUS, Alvin and Virginia Ask for free folder and information lighted and amazed by what his adopted by Silverstein.
    [Show full text]
  • DICTIONARY of the HISTORY of SCIENCE Subject Editors
    DICTIONARY OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE Subject Editors Astronomy Michael A. Hoskin, Churchill College, Cambridge. Biology Richard W. Burkhardt, Jr, Department of History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Chemistry William H. Brock, Victorian Studies Centre, University of Leicester. Earth sciences Roy Porter, W ellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London. Historiography Steven Shapin, & sociology Science Studies Unit, of science University of Edinburgh. Human Roger Smith, sciences Department of History, University of Lancaster. Mathematics Eric J. Aiton, Mathematics Faculty, Manchester Polytechnic. Medicine William F. Bynum, W ellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London. Philosophy Roy Bhaskar, of science School of Social Sciences, University of Sussex. Physics John L. Heilbron, Office for History of Science & Technology, University of California, Berkeley. DICTIONARY OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE edited by W.EBynum E.J.Browne Roy Porter M © The Macmillan Press Ltd 1981 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1981 978-0-333-29316-4 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. First published 1981 by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD London and Basingstoke Associated Companies throughout the world. ISBN 978-1-349-05551-7 ISBN 978-1-349-05549-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-05549-4 Typeset by Computacomp (UK) Ltd, Fort William, Scotland Macmillan Consultant Editor Klaus Boehm Contents Introduction vii Acknowledgements viii Contributors X Analytical table of contents xiii Bibliography xxiii Abbreviations xxxiv Dictionary Bibliographical index 452 Introduction How is the historical dimension of science relevant to understanding its place in our lives? It is widely agreed that our present attitudes and ideas about religion, art, or morals are oriented the way they are, and thus related to other beliefs, because of their history.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2006 Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels Stephen Bauer Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Christianity Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bauer, Stephen, "Moral Implications of Darwinian Evolution for Human Reference Based in Christian Ethics: a Critical Analysis and Response to the "Moral Individualism" of James Rachels" (2006). Dissertations. 16. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/16 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary MORAL IMPLICATIONS OF DARWINIAN EVOLUTION FOR HUMAN PREFERENCE BASED IN CHRISTIAN ETHICS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE TO THE “MORAL INDIVIDUALISM” OF JAMES RACHELS A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Stephen Bauer November 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3248152 Copyright 2006 by Bauer, Stephen All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Charles Darwin
    teorema Vol. XXVIII/2, 2009, pp. 123-133 [BIBLID 0210-1602 (2009) 28:2; pp. 123-133] ‘The Social Instincts Naturally Lead to the Golden Rule’: The Ethics of Charles Darwin John Mizzoni […] the social instincts […] with the aid of active intellectual powers and the effects of habit, naturally lead to the golden rule, “As ye would that men should do to you, do ye to them likewise;” and this lies at the foundation of morality. [DARWIN, The Descent of Man (1871), p. 71] RESUMEN En The Descent of Man, Darwin discute una gran variedad de problemas éticos de manera exclusiva, dice él, desde la perspectiva de la historia natural. Intentando situar los puntos de vista de Darwin sobre la evolución y la ética dentro de las discusiones contemporáneas sobre filosofía moral reviso, en primer lugar, cómo el enfoque que Darwin hace de la evolución y la ética encaja en la metaética contemporánea, especialmente con cuatro teorías de tales como la del error, el expresi- vismo, el relativismo y el realismo. PALABRAS CLAVE: Darwin, metaética, teoría del error, expresivismo, relativismo moral, realismo moral. ABSTRACT In the The Descent of Man, Darwin discusses a wide variety of ethical issues, exclusively, he says, from the perspective of natural history. As an attempt to situate Darwin’s views on evolution and ethics into contemporary discussions of moral theory, in this paper I first look at how Darwin’s approach to evolution and ethics fits in with contemporary metaethical theory, specifically the four theories of error theory, expressivism, relativism, and realism. KEYWORDS: Darwin, metaethics, error theory, expressivism, moral relativism, moral realism.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Systems Theorizing Based on Evolutionary Psychology: an Interdisciplinary Review and Theory Integration Framework1
    Kock/IS Theorizing Based on Evolutionary Psychology THEORY AND REVIEW INFORMATION SYSTEMS THEORIZING BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW AND THEORY INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK1 By: Ned Kock on one evolutionary information systems theory—media Division of International Business and Technology naturalness theory—previously developed as an alternative to Studies media richness theory, and one non-evolutionary information Texas A&M International University systems theory, channel expansion theory. 5201 University Boulevard Laredo, TX 78041 Keywords: Information systems, evolutionary psychology, U.S.A. theory development, media richness theory, media naturalness [email protected] theory, channel expansion theory Abstract Introduction Evolutionary psychology holds great promise as one of the possible pillars on which information systems theorizing can While information systems as a distinct area of research has take place. Arguably, evolutionary psychology can provide the potential to be a reference for other disciplines, it is the key to many counterintuitive predictions of behavior reasonable to argue that information systems theorizing can toward technology, because many of the evolved instincts that benefit from fresh new insights from other fields of inquiry, influence our behavior are below our level of conscious which may in turn enhance even more the reference potential awareness; often those instincts lead to behavioral responses of information systems (Baskerville and Myers 2002). After that are not self-evident. This paper provides a discussion of all, to be influential in other disciplines, information systems information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psych- research should address problems that are perceived as rele- ology, centered on key human evolution and evolutionary vant by scholars in those disciplines and in ways that are genetics concepts and notions.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Natural History of Emotions: Darwin's Legacy
    revista de historia de la psicología © 2009: Publicacions de la Universitat de València 2009,On the vol. natural 30, núm. history 2-3 (junio-septiembre) of emotions 161-168 Valencia (España). ISSN: 0211-0040161 On the natural history of emotions: Darwin’s legacy Paulo Jesus* Universidade Lusófono do Porto Abstract One of the most striking applications of Darwinian principles resides in the evolutionary account of expression of emotions. The main purpose of this paper is to ask some fundamental questions concerning this realm of Darwinian investigations and its implicit or explicit legacy in contem- porary psychology of emotions, which appears inhabited by the essential tension between the primacy of embodiment (from James to Damasio) and that of cognitive mediation (from Peirce to Lazarus). One should ask again: what is an emotion? Is it reducible to a bodily expression or is there any qualitative difference between emotion and expression? Why do emotions belong to the phenomena of life? How do the grammar of life and the grammar of culture interact in emotional expressions? What is the «truth» of Darwin’s principles on expressions and what degree of coherence can be detected when one attempts at integrating the theory of emotions in the larger picture of the evolution of life forms and cultural meaningful phenomena? Darwin is systematically attracted towards normative invariants, that is, nomological relation- ships and functions which organise a dynamic morphogenetic process. Thus, Darwin’s theory of expression of emotions identifies a set of three universal principles that complement each other. These comprise not only the notion of adaptive behaviour, association of learned habits and evolution of instinct, but also that of body structure (specially the web of muscles that define and constrain the landscape of the face), inheritance of movements and independent action of the nervous system.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptions of the Nature of Biology Held by Senior Secondary School
    Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences 2017 (Volume5 - Issue 3 ) Conceptions of the Nature of Biology [1] Department of Science Education, University of Ilorin, Held by Senior Secondary School Ilorin, Nigeria P.M.B. 1515 Ilorin, Nigeria Biology Teachers in Ilorin, Kwara State, [email protected] Nigeria [2] Department of Science Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria P.M.B. 1515 Ilorin, Nigeria Adegboye, Motunrayo Catherine[1], Ganiyu Bello [2], Isaac, O. [email protected] Abimbola[3] [3] Department of Science Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria P.M.B. 1515 Ilorin, Nigeria ABSTRACT [email protected] There is a sustained public outcry against the persistent abysmal performance of students in biology and other science subjects at the Senior School Certificate Examinations conducted by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) and the National Examinations Council (NECO). Biology is a unique science discipline with peculiar philosophical principles and methodology that are not applicable to other science disciplines. Understanding the unique structure of knowledge, principles and methodology for providing explanations in biology is sine qua-non for effective and efficiency teaching of biology by teachers, and meaningful learning by the students. This study, therefore, investigated the conceptions of the nature of biology held by biology teachers in Ilorin, Nigeria. The study adopted the descriptive research design of the survey type. A questionnaire entitled “Biology Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Biology Questionnaire”(BTCNBQ) was designed by the researchers and used as the instrument for data collection. The population for the study comprised all the biology teachers in Ilorin, Nigeria. Simple random sampling technique was used to select two hundred and sixty (260) biology teachers from Ilorin, Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Biology - Alberto M
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. I – History of Biology - Alberto M. Simonetta HISTORY OF BIOLOGY Alberto M. Simonetta Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, “L. Pardi,” University of Firenze, Italy Keywords: Biology, history, Antiquity, Middle ages, Renaissance, morphology, palaeontology, taxonomy, evolution, histology, embryology, genetics, ethology, ecology, pathology Contents 1. Introduction 2. Antiquity 3. The Medieval and Renaissance periods 4. The Development of Morphology 5. Paleontology 6. Taxonomy and Evolution 7. Histology, Reproduction, and Embryology 8. Physiology 9. Genetics 10. Ecology and Ethology 11. Pathology Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary A short account is given of the development of biological sciences from their Greek origins to recent times. Biology as a pure science was the creation of Aristotle, but was abandoned shortly after his death. However, considerable advances relevant for medicine continued to be made until the end of classical times, in such fields as anatomy and botany. These developments are reviewed. After a long pause, both pure and applied research began anew in the thirteenth century, and developedUNESCO at an increasing pace therea fter.– However, EOLSS unlike astronomy and physics, which experienced a startling resurgence as soon as adequate mathematical methods and instruments became available, the development of biology was steady but slow until the appearance of Darwin’s revolutionary ideas about evolution brought about a fundamental shiftSAMPLE in the subject’s outlook. TheCHAPTERS efflorescence of biological sciences in the post-Darwinian period is outlined briefly. 1. Introduction To outline more than 2000 years of biology in a few pages is an extremely difficult endeavor as, quite apart from the complexities of both the subject itself and of the technical and theoretical approaches of various scholars, the development of scholars’ views, ideas, and researches forms an intricate network that cannot be fully disentangled in such a brief account.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin and Linnaean Classification Phylogenetics Willi Hennig
    11/7/2013 The major points of this short section: 1. Trait evolution hypotheses must be • You can build a hierarchical arrangement of evaluated/tested anything – Need a phylogeny • To recover the evolutionary history of 2. Phylogenies are hypotheses! organisms we need a method that is – Mo data mo betta – Empirical 3. Taxonomy should reflect phylogeny! – Objective – Names and ranks are meaningful – Testable Darwin and Linnaean Classification Phylogenetics • Pre-Darwin Classification all true classification is genealogical; that community • Post-Darwin Classification of descent is the hidden bond which naturalists have been unconsciously seeking, and not some unknown plan of creation, or the enunciation of general propositions, and the mere putting together and separating objects more or less alike. – Charles Darwin Willi Hennig (1913-1976) Phylogeny • A phylogeny is a hypothesis of ancestor- descendent relationships • Usually shown as a cladogram (C(P(R(W,H)))) 1 11/7/2013 Phylogeny is genealogy Not a pedigree • Phylogeny is a genealogy writ large • Pedigrees are reticulate Interpreting a phylogeny You spin me right round • Stratford, draw a sample • Tips are _______ • Nodes are________ • Branches are ______ • A clade is _________ • Traits are plotted _______ Phylogram END DAY 1 2 11/7/2013 CHRONOGRAM Phylograms: Quantifying differences You’re like, in the outgroup Higher organisms? – no way dude • Organisms are only more ancestral or more derived for a set of characters • Never use “higher” or “lower” What to do with a phylogeny – opsis
    [Show full text]
  • Lamarck: the Birth of Biology Author(S): Frans A
    Lamarck: The Birth of Biology Author(s): Frans A. Stafleu Reviewed work(s): Source: Taxon, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Aug., 1971), pp. 397-442 Published by: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1218244 . Accessed: 24/12/2012 16:29 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Taxon. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:29:36 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TAXON 20(4): 397-442. AUGUST 1971 LAMARCK:THE BIRTH OF BIOLOGY Frans A. Stafleu "A long blind patience, such was his genius of the Universe" (Sainte Beuve) Summary A review of the development of Lamarck'sideas on biological systematibswith special reference to the origin and development of his concept of organic evolution. Lamarck's development towards biological systematics is traced through his early botanical and geological writings and related to the gradual change in his scientific outlook from a static and essentialist view of nature towards a dynamic and positivist concept of the life sciences as a special discipline.
    [Show full text]