Joel Kaplan Vice President, Global Public Policy Facebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Joel Kaplan Vice President, Global Public Policy Facebook Joel Kaplan is Vice President, Global Public Policy at Facebook. In this role, he manages the company’s global public policy strategy, working with governments and non- governmental organizations to foster understanding and support for Facebook’s innovative technology. He originally joined Facebook in 2011 as Vice President of US Public Policy, overseeing the company’s relationships with policymakers at the federal and state levels. Prior to joining Facebook, Kaplan was the Executive Vice President for Public Policy and External Affairs for Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH). In that position, Kaplan oversaw enterprise-wide public affairs and led EFH’s efforts to publicly demonstrate and communicate its role in the energy industry. Kaplan joined EFH from the White House, where he served as Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy under President George W. Bush from 2006-2009. He was responsible for the development and implementation of the Administration’s policy agenda. He framed strategic decisions on a full range of policy matters and integrated the execution of legislative, communications, and external outreach and policy strategies on behalf of the President and Chief of Staff. From 2003-2006, he served as the Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget. From 2001-2003 he was Special Assistant to the President for Policy within the White House Chief of Staff’s office. He began his professional career as a law clerk for Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge J. Michael Luttig and then for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Kaplan was an Artillery Officer in the United States Marine Corps for four years. He holds a B.A. in government from Harvard College and J.D. from Harvard Law School. Joel and his family currently live in Chevy Chase, MD. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Deplatforming Misogyny
Copyright © 2021 Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) Published by Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) 180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1420 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1C7 www.leaf.ca LEAF is a national, charitable, non-profit organization, founded in 1985. LEAF works to advance the substantive equality rights of women and girls in Canada through litigation, law reform and public education using the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This publication was created as part of LEAF's Technology-Facilitated Violence (TFV) Project. The TFV Project brings together feminist lawyers and academics to conduct research and produce publications imagining legal responses to TFV against women and gender-diverse people that are informed by equality principles. The project also supports and informs LEAF’s law reform efforts and potential upcoming interventions concerning TFV. Acknowledgements Deep gratitude and appreciation go to the many people whose efforts and support made this publication possible. This report was researched and written by Cynthia Khoo, a technology and human rights lawyer and researcher. Cynthia holds an LL.M. (Concentration in Law and Technology) from the University of Ottawa, where she worked on cases as junior counsel at the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC). Her paper on platform liability for emergent systemic harm to historically marginalized groups received the inaugural Ian R. Kerr Robotnik Memorial Award for the Best Paper by an Emerging Scholar at We Robot 2020. She has managed a sole practice law firm, Tekhnos Law, and obtained her J.D. from the University of Victoria.
[Show full text]
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Digest of Other White House Announcements December 31, 2019 The following list includes the President's public schedule and other items of general interest announced by the Office of the Press Secretary and not included elsewhere in this Compilation. January 1 In the afternoon, the President posted to his personal Twitter feed his congratulations to President Jair Messias Bolsonaro of Brazil on his Inauguration. In the evening, the President had a telephone conversation with Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel. During the day, the President had a telephone conversation with President Abdelfattah Said Elsisi of Egypt to reaffirm Egypt-U.S. relations, including the shared goals of countering terrorism and increasing regional stability, and discuss the upcoming inauguration of the Cathedral of the Nativity and the al-Fatah al-Aleem Mosque in the New Administrative Capital and other efforts to advance religious freedom in Egypt. January 2 In the afternoon, in the Situation Room, the President and Vice President Michael R. Pence participated in a briefing on border security by Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen M. Nielsen for congressional leadership. January 3 In the afternoon, the President had separate telephone conversations with Anamika "Mika" Chand-Singh, wife of Newman, CA, police officer Cpl. Ronil Singh, who was killed during a traffic stop on December 26, 2018, Newman Police Chief Randy Richardson, and Stanislaus County, CA, Sheriff Adam Christianson to praise Officer Singh's service to his fellow citizens, offer his condolences, and commend law enforcement's rapid investigation, response, and apprehension of the suspect.
[Show full text]
Office of the Chief of Staff, in Full
THE WHITE HOUSE TRANSITION PROJECT 1997-2021 Smoothing the Peaceful Transfer of Democratic Power Report 2021—20 THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF David B. Cohen, The University of Akron Charles E. Walcott, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Smoothing the Peaceful Transfer of Democratic Power WHO WE ARE & WHAT WE DO THE WHITE HOUSE TRANSITION PROJECT. Begun in 1998, the White House Transition Project provides information about individual offices for staff coming into the White House to help streamline the process of transition from one administration to the next. A nonpartisan, nonprofit group, the WHTP brings together political science scholars who study the presidency and White House operations to write analytical pieces on relevant topics about presidential transitions, presidential appointments, and crisis management. Since its creation, it has participated in the 2001, 2005, 2009, 2013, 2017, and now the 2021. WHTP coordinates with government agencies and other non-profit groups, e.g., the US National Archives or the Partnership for Public Service. It also consults with foreign governments and organizations interested in improving governmental transitions, worldwide. See the project at http://whitehousetransitionproject.org The White House Transition Project produces a number of materials, including: . White House Office Essays: Based on interviews with key personnel who have borne these unique responsibilities, including former White House Chiefs of Staff; Staff Secretaries; Counsels; Press Secretaries, etc. , WHTP produces briefing books for each of the critical White House offices. These briefs compile the best practices suggested by those who have carried out the duties of these office. With the permission of the interviewees, interviews are available on the National Archives website page dedicated to this project: .
[Show full text]
A Bang Not a Whimper: Bush's Endgame Strategy
A bang not a whimper: Bush’s Endgame Strategy By Michael Carmichael Region: USA Global Research, May 11, 2006 Theme: US NATO War Agenda 11 May 2006 Two of America’s savants have uttered pronouncements about the final days of the presidency of George Walker Bush. In his magisterial statement succinctly titled, “Bush’s Thousand Days,” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. pointed out that we have just crossed a significant date, for now less than one thousand days remain of the beleaguered Bush presidency. Schlesinger raises grave issues facing the deeply unpopular president. In his analysis of “The Passion of George W. Bush,” Sidney Blumenthal dubbed this darkening period the “endgame.” Taken together, these two essays present a disturbing image of a presidency in the throes of decline and desperation. These two essays urge us to consider the likelihood of a political collapse that could lead to disastrous consequences for America and Britain. Blumenthal dissected the faded and now tattered dreams of the president and his wunderkind, Karl Rove. Gone with the wind is their vision of an Imperial America modelled on the pompous presidency of William McKinley, whose dream of the transcendence of American corporate monopolies and global military hegemony was thrown into the incinerator by FDR when he re-wrote the American social contract in the first one hundred days of the New Deal. Yet, that aching nostalgia for an Imperial Presidency boldly governing a global American Empire did not die: it merely smouldered and rolled over in its grave,nosferatu , undead, unforgotten and lurking its next opportunity to sink its fangs into the jugular vein of destiny.
[Show full text]
Purveying Fake News
1 GOVERNANCE IN AN EMERGING NEW WORLD Convened by George P. Shultz with James Cunningham, David Fedor, and James Timbie Table of Contents FALL SERIES, ISSUE 318 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 What Is to Be Done? Safeguarding Democratic Governance in the Age of Network Platforms Niall Ferguson ................................................................................................................................................................................................8 Protecting Democracy in an Era of Cyber Information War Joseph S. Nye ..............................................................................................................................................................................................37 Observations from the Roundtable ................................................................................................................................. 47 GOVERNANCE IN AN EMERGING NEW WORLD The Information Challenge to Democracy A Letter from the Conveners Sharp changes are afoot throughout the globe. Demographics are shifting, technology is advancing at unprecedented rates, and these changes are being felt everywhere. How should we develop strategies to deal with this emerging new world? We can begin by understanding it. First, there is the changing composition of the world population, which will have a profound impact on societies. Developed
[Show full text]
2014-0012-F Finding
Presidential Materials Division 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room G-7 Washington, DC 20408-0001 Phone: (202) 357-5200 Fax: (202) 357-5941 [email protected] Inventory for FOIA 2014-0012-F Photographs of Vice President Cheney with David Addington; Vice President Cheney Meeting with President George W. Bush; David Addington by Himself and with Others; Vice President Cheney on September 11, 2001; and Meetings Involving Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers Extent 4,201 photographs Access Collection is open to all researchers. Access to Cheney Vice Presidential records is governed by the Presidential Records Act (PRA)(44 USC 22, as amended) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)(5 USC 552, as amended) and therefore may be restricted in whole or in part in accordance with legal exemptions. Copyright Records in this collection that were prepared by officials of the United States Government as part of their official duties are in the public domain. Researchers are advised to consult the copyright law of the United States (Title 17, USC) which governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Provenance Official records of the Richard Cheney vice presidency are in the custody of the Presidential Materials Division in Washington, DC and are administered by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the provisions of the Presidential Records Act (PRA). 1 Processed By Staff Archivists, September 2014. Previously restricted materials are added as they are released. Scope and Content The materials in this series are a selective, not necessarily all-inclusive, body of records responsive to the topic of FOIA request 2014-0012-F.
[Show full text]
Tackling the “Fake”
Tackling the “Fake” Without Harming the “News” A Paper Series on Regulatory Responses to Misinformation Edited by Michael Karanicolas Yale LawSchool Information Society Project / Nowhere to Hide / Andrew Burt March 2021 Acknowledgements This paper series was edited by Michael Karanicolas, Wikimedia Fellow, Yale Law School, with the invaluable support of the WIII program team of Abby Lemert, Elizabeth Zietz, Juan Carlos Salamanca Vázquez, and Robin Asgari. The chapter authors are Nathalie Maréchal, Senior Policy Analyst, Ranking Digital Rights; Elizabeth Renieris, Founding Director, Notre Dame-IBM Technology Ethics Lab; Jan Rydzak, Company Engagement Lead, Ranking Digital Rights; Ivar Hartmann, Associate Professor, Insper Learning Institution; Jonathan Obar, Assistant Professor, York University; Akriti Gaur; and Lisa H. Macpherson, Senior Policy Fellow, Public Knowledge. The introduction is by Michael Karanicolas, and the foreword is by Amanda Keton, General Counsel, Wikimedia Foundation. Thanks to Nancy Liao, Francesca Procaccini, Niklas Eder, Adam Posluns, Jennifer Henrichsen, Chinmayi Arun, Alicia Solow-Niederman, Pauline Trouillard, Artur Pericles Lima Monteiro, Jisu Kim, Przemysław Pałka, Maren Woebbeking, Elettra Bietti, Tomiwa Ilori, and Ayesha Khan, all of whom contributed to the review process. Thanks are also due to Jack Balkin, founder and director of the Yale Information Society Project, and Nikolas Guggenberger, EXecutive Director of the Yale Information Society Project, whose leadership and guidance were enormously helpful in taking this forward. Likewise, thanks go out to the Wikimedia Foundation, whose support made this project possible. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to: ñ Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format ñ Adapt — remiX, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
[Show full text]
Moderating Content Moderation: a Framework for Nonpartisanship in Online Governance
MODERATING CONTENT MODERATION: A FRAMEWORK FOR NONPARTISANSHIP IN ONLINE GOVERNANCE EDWARD LEE* Internet platforms serve two important roles that often conflict. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other internet platforms facilitate the unfettered exchange of free speech by millions of people, yet they also moderate or restrict the speech according to their “community standards,” such as prohibitions against hate speech and advocating violence, to provide a safe environment for their users. These dual roles give internet platforms unparalleled power over online speech—even more so than most governments. Yet, unlike government actors, internet platforms are not subject to checks and balances that courts or agencies must follow, such as promulgating well-defined procedural rules and affording notice, due process, and appellate review to individuals. Internet platforms have devised their own policies and procedures for content moderation, but the platforms’ enforcement remains opaque—especially when compared to courts and agencies. Based on an independent survey of the community standards of the largest internet platforms, this Article shows that few internet platforms disclose the precise procedural steps and safeguards of their content moderation—perhaps hoping to avoid public scrutiny over those procedures. This lack of transparency has left internet platforms vulnerable to vocal accusations of having an “anti-conservative bias” in their content moderation, especially from politicians. Internet platforms deny such a bias, but their response has not mollified Republican lawmakers, who have proposed amending, if not repealing, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act * Professor of Law, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law; Founder, The Free Internet Project. Many thanks to helpful comments from Kathy Baker, Felice Batlan, Sungjoon Cho, Eric Goldman, Hal Krent, Nancy Marder, Blake Reid, Mark Rosen, Alex Boni-Saenz, Chris Schmidt, Stephanie Stern, Eugene Volokh, and participants of faculty workshops.
[Show full text]
White House Evolution and Institutionalization: the Office of Chief of Staff Since Reagan
ARTICLES White House Evolution and Institutionalization: The Office of Chief of Staff since Reagan DAVID B. COHEN University of Akron KAREN M. HULT Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University CHARLES E. WALCOTT Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University In exploring the evolution and institutionalization of the White House chief of staff and the office that chiefs oversee, we focus on presidencies from Reagan through Obama. We pay particular attention to the evolution of several major roles that chiefs of staff perform, to the dynamics in the chief of staff’s office, and to the emergence of multiple deputy chiefs of staff. Despite variation in the activities and emphases of chiefs of staff and their opera- tions, patterns include partisan learning across administrations, term and meta cycles, and distinctive prioritization of roles. The White House chief of staff, a job that Sherman Adams pioneered under Dwight Eisenhower, became a permanent fixture of the institutional presidency when Jimmy Car- ter formalized Hamilton Jordan’s position in 1978. Since its emergence in 1953, the posi- tion has undergone steady evolution, and expectations about its performance mostly have stabilized. At the same time, the job continues to adapt to the distinctive needs of presi- dents and presidencies and to the dynamics of U.S. governance. Based on a larger project that seeks to describe and analyze the office of the White House chief of staff over the course of the modern U.S. presidency (Cohen, Hult, and David B. Cohen is a professor of political science at the University of Akron, where he also is a fellow at the Ray C.
[Show full text]
Presidential TRANSITION GUIDE
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL 9 A.M. ON JANARY 20 Presidential TRANSITION GUIDE PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE Center for Presidential Tr ansition The Partnership for Public Service is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to revitalize the federal government by inspiring a new generation to serve and by transforming the way government works. The Partnership teams up with federal agencies and other stakeholders to make our government more effective and efficient. We pursue this goal by: • Providing assistance to federal agencies to improve their management and operations, and to strengthen their leadership capacity • Conducting outreach to college campuses and job seekers to promote public service • Identifying and celebrating government’s successes so they can be replicated across government • Advocating for needed legislative and regulatory reforms to strengthen the civil service • Generating research on, and effective responses to, the workforce challenges facing our federal government • Enhancing public understanding of the valuable work civil servants perform We would like to thank our strategic partner in this work, The Boston Consulting Group, as well as the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, whose generous support made this transition guide possible. Presidential TRANSITION GUIDE January 2016 First Edition Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 7 About this Guide 10 GETTING ORGANIZED 13 Fundamentals of Getting Organized 13 Major Steps in Presidential Transition Management 18 BUILDING THE TEAM 41 Key Transition Leadership Activities 43
[Show full text]
Faking News: Fraudulent News and the Fight for Truth 5 Confidence in the Press
FAKING NEWS Fraudulent News and the Fight for Truth 1 FAKING NEWS Fraudulent News and the Fight for Truth October 12, 2017 © 2017 PEN America. All rights reserved. PEN America stands at the intersection of literature and human rights to protect open expression in the United States and worldwide. We champion the freedom to write, recognizing the power of the word to transform the world. Our mission is to unite writers and their allies to celebrate creative expression and defend the liberties that make it possible. Founded in 1922, PEN America is the largest of more than 100 centers of PEN International. Our strength is in our membership—a nationwide community of more than 5,000 novelists, journalists, poets, essayists, playwrights, editors, publishers, translators, agents, and other writing professionals. For more information, visit pen.org. Cover photograph: Dru Menaker CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY ESSAY FRAUDULENT NEWS AND THE THREAT TO FREE EXPRESSION 4 DEFINING FRAUDULENT NEWS 19 RELEVANT DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW 20 NEWS CONSUMERS’ BILL OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 22 PREFACE 24 FACEBOOK 25 GOOGLE 36 TWITTER 45 PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS 49 FACT-CHECKING 60 NEWS LITERACY 66 RECOMMENDATIONS 72 METHODOLOGY AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 74 ENDNOTES 75 Introductory Essay FRAUDULENT NEWS AND THE THREAT TO FREE EXPRESSION By Suzanne Nossel, executive director of PEN America he rise of fraudulent news and the erosion of Russia, Myanmar, Egypt, and elsewhere—have landed at public trust in mainstream journalism, due in our own doorsteps. Insults directed against journalists part to a deliberate campaign of denigration, for doing their jobs, willful intimidation of members of pose a looming crisis for American democ- vulnerable groups, attacks on reporters, and crackdowns racy and civic life.
[Show full text]
Fake” Without Harming the “News”
Tackling the “Fake” Without Harming the “News” A Paper Series on Regulatory Responses to Misinformation Edited by Michael Karanicolas March 2021 Yale LawSchool Information Society Project / Nowhere to Hide / Andrew Burt Acknowledgements This paper series was edited by Michael Karanicolas, Wikimedia Fellow, Yale Law School, with the invaluable support of the WIII program team of Abby Lemert, Elizabeth Zietz, Juan Carlos Salamanca Vázquez, and Robin Asgari. The chapter authors are Nathalie Maréchal, Senior Policy Analyst, Ranking Digital Rights; Elizabeth Renieris, Founding Director, Notre Dame-IBM Technology Ethics Lab; Jan Rydzak, Company Engagement Lead, Ranking Digital Rights; Ivar Hartmann, Associate Professor, Insper Learning Institution; Jonathan Obar, Assistant Professor, York University; Akriti Gaur; and Lisa H. Macpherson, Senior Policy Fellow, Public Knowledge. The introduction is by Michael Karanicolas, and the foreword is by Amanda Keton, General Counsel, Wikimedia Foundation. Thanks to Nancy Liao, Francesca Procaccini, Niklas Eder, Adam Posluns, Jennifer Henrichsen, Chinmayi Arun, Alicia Solow-Niederman, Pauline Trouillard, Artur Pericles Lima Monteiro, Jisu Kim, Przemysław Pałka, Maren Woebbeking, Elettra Bietti, Tomiwa Ilori, and Ayesha Khan, all of whom contributed to the review process. Thanks are also due to Jack Balkin, founder and director of the Yale Information Society Project, and Nikolas Guggenberger, Executive Director of the Yale Information Society Project, whose leadership and guidance were enormously helpful in taking this forward. Likewise, thanks go out to the Wikimedia Foundation, whose support made this project possible. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
[Show full text]