2014-0012-F Finding
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc. -
Recent Developments in NAFTA
Law and Business Review of the Americas Volume 14 Number 4 Article 14 2008 Recent Developments in NAFTA Melissa Long Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/lbra Recommended Citation Melissa Long, Recent Developments in NAFTA, 14 LAW & BUS. REV. AM. 875 (2008) https://scholar.smu.edu/lbra/vol14/iss4/14 This Update is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law and Business Review of the Americas by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NAFTA Melissa Long I. INTRODUCTION HE overriding theme in the current state of NAFTA centers on whether or not renegotiation of the free trade agreement should happen in the near future. This paper will address a few of the prominent issues facing NAFTA right now. First, U.S. lawmakers and unions are currently challenging the U.S. pilot program allowing for Mex- ican trucks on U.S. highways. Second, farmers in the United States and Mexico are questioning the agreement generally, and the sugar industry of both nations is specifically concerned. The issue was discussed at the summit of North American leaders in New Orleans in April 2008. Fi- nally, this issue will examine the future of NAFTA, as it seems to be in great peril due to anti-NAFFA stances being taken by both of the demo- cratic presidential candidates in the United States. II. U.S. LAWMAKERS CHALLENGE PILOT TRUCK PROGRAM In September 2007, the U.S. -
Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency's Civil Liberties
112 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 6 ARTICLE Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency’s Civil Liberties Gap __________________________ Margo Schlanger* * Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law, University of Michigan. I have greatly benefited from conversations with John DeLong, Mort Halperin, Alex Joel, David Kris, Marty Lederman, Nancy Libin, Rick Perlstein, Becky Richards, and several officials who prefer not to be named, all of whom generously spent time with me, discussing the issues in this article, and many of whom also helped again after reading the piece in draft. I would also like to extend thanks to Sam Bagenstos, Rick Lempert, Daphna Renan, Alex Rossmiller, Adrian Vermeule, Steve Vladeck, Marcy Wheeler, Shirin Sinnar and other participants in the 7th Annual National Security Law Workshop, participants at the University of Iowa law faculty workshop, and my colleagues at the University of Michigan Legal Theory Workshop and governance group lunch, who offered me extremely helpful feedback. Jennifer Gitter and Lauren Dayton provided able research assistance. All errors are, of course, my responsibility. Copyright © 2015 by the Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and Margo Schlanger. 2015 / Intelligence Legalism and the NSA’s Civil Liberties Gaps 113 Abstract Since June 2013, we have seen unprecedented security breaches and disclosures relating to American electronic surveillance. The nearly daily drip, and occasional gush, of once-secret policy and operational information makes it possible to analyze and understand National Security Agency activities, including the organizations and processes inside and outside the NSA that are supposed to safeguard American’s civil liberties as the agency goes about its intelligence gathering business. -
Letter Were James M
New York State Bar Association NYSBA One Elk Street, Albany, New York 12207 • 518/463-3200 • http://www.nysba.org TAX SECTION MEMBERS-AT-LARGE OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE . William G. Cavanagh Jeffrey D. Hochberg Janet B. Korins Matthew A. Rosen Gordon Warnke 2004-2005 Executive Committee Edward E. Gonzalez SherwinKamin Sherry S.Kraus SethL. Rosen David E. Watts LEWIS R. STEINBERG Alysse Grossman Arnold Y. Kapiloff Jiyeon Lee-Lim Joel Scharfstein Paul R. Wysocki Chair David R. Hardy Charles I. Kingson Deborah L. Paul Bryan C. Skarlatos Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Worldwide Plaza 825 8* Avenue New York, NY 10019 212/474-1656 DAVID P. HARITON First Vice-Chair 212/558-4248 KIMBERLYS.BLANCHARD Second Vice-Chair 212/310-8799 August 24, 2004 PATRICK C. GALLAGHER Secretary 212/446-4998 The Honorable Members of the Finance Committee of the U.S. Senate COMMITTEE CHAIRS: Bankruptcy and Operating Losses The Honorable Members of the Committee on Ways and Means of the Lawrence M. Garrett Stuart J. Goldring U.S. House of Representatives Compliance, Practice & Procedure Barbara!. Kaplan The Honorable John W. Snow Ellis W.Reemer Consolidated Returns Jonathan Kushner Linda Z.Swartz Subject: Senate JOBS Bill Amendments to Section 269 Corporations Kathleen L. Ferrell Jodi J. Schwartz Employee Benefits Ladies and Gentlemen: Karen G. Krueger Max J. Schwartz Estates and Trusts T. Randolph Harris I am writing on behalf of the Tax Section of the New York State JetfreyN. Schwartz Financial Instruments Bar Association concerning section 435 of H.R. 4520, the Jumpstart Our Michael S. Farber ErikaW.Nijenhuis Business Strength (JOBS) Act as passed by the Senate on July 15, 2004 Financial Intermediaries David M. -
Former Secretaries of Commerce Urge Congress to Pass Trade Promotion Authority
Former Secretaries of Commerce Urge Congress to Pass Trade Promotion Authority March 25, 2015 As former Secretaries of Commerce, we strongly support Trade Promotion Authority for President Obama. From our experience, it is critically important for American businesses to access new customer markets while staying competitive in the world economy. American companies grow and succeed in the global market place through high-quality high-standard trade agreements that help our firms gain access to new overseas markets. With 95 percent of the world’s consumers living outside the United States, we must not allow opportunities to pass us by. Last year, the U.S. exported $2.34 trillion dollars of goods and services. Those exports support a total of 11.7 million American jobs at over 300,000 companies – 98 percent of which are small and medium sized businesses. These numbers are especially important as export-related jobs pay up to 18 percent more on average than non-export-related jobs. New U.S. trade agreements will generate more export opportunities for American companies, boost our economy, create jobs, and yield overall prosperity for our country. Currently the U.S. government is working on two key trade agreements that have the potential to open overseas markets for U.S. companies. Once completed, the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) will give the United States free trade arrangements with 65 percent of global GDP and give our businesses preferential access to a large base of new potential customers. But before we can finalize those agreements and our businesses can benefit from the new markets, Congress must pass trade promotion legislation. -
The Virtues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror
Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Law Faculty Scholarship Law Faculty Scholarship 4-2009 The etD ainees' Dilemma: The irV tues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror Peter Margulies Roger Williams University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/law_fac_fs Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Peter Margulies, The eD tainees' Dilemma: The irV tues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror, 57 Buff. L. Rev. 347, 432 (2009) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Scholarship at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 57 Buff. L. Rev. 347 2009 Provided by: Roger Williams University School of Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Thu Nov 17 10:09:44 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information BUFFALO LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 APRIL 2009 NUMBER 2 The Detainees' Dilemma: The Virtues and Vices of Advocacy Strategies in the War on Terror PETER MARGULIESt INTRODUCTION For detainees in the war on terror, advocacy outside of court is often the main event.' Analysis of advocacy through the prism of Supreme Court decisions 2 resembles surveying t Professor of Law, Roger Williams University School of Law; e-mail: [email protected]. -
Union Calendar No. 512 107Th Congress, 2D Session –––––––––– House Report 107–811
1 Union Calendar No. 512 107th Congress, 2d Session –––––––––– House Report 107–811 ACTIVITIES AND SUMMARY REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES One Hundred Seventh Congress (Pursuant to House Rule XI, Cl. 1.(d)) JANUARY 2, 2003.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2003 VerDate Jan 31 2003 01:23 May 01, 2003 Jkt 019006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR811.XXX HR811 E:\seals\congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET JIM NUSSLE, Iowa, Chairman JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire JOHN M. SPRATT, JR., South Carolina, Vice Chairman Ranking Minority Member PETER HOEKSTRA, Michigan JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington Vice Chairman BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire KEN BENTSEN, Texas GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota JIM DAVIS, Florida VAN HILLEARY, Tennessee EVA M. CLAYTON, North Carolina MAC THORNBERRY, Texas DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina JIM RYUN, Kansas GERALD D. KLECZKA, Wisconsin MAC COLLINS, Georgia BOB CLEMENT, Tennessee GARY G. MILLER, California JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia PAT TOOMEY, Pennsylvania DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon WES WATKINS, Oklahoma TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin DOC HASTINGS, Washington CAROLYN MCCARTHY, New York JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California DENNIS MOORE, Kansas ROB PORTMAN, Ohio MICHAEL M. HONDA, California RAY LAHOOD, Illinois JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL III, Pennsylvania KAY GRANGER, Texas RUSH D. HOLT, New Jersey EDWARD SCHROCK, Virginia JIM MATHESON, Utah JOHN CULBERSON, Texas [Vacant] HENRY E. BROWN, JR., South Carolina ANDER CRENSHAW, Florida ADAM PUTNAM, Florida MARK KIRK, Illinois [Vacant] PROFESSIONAL STAFF RICH MEADE, Chief of Staff THOMAS S. -
Federal Government, Pgs. 0103-0126
CHAPTER 3 Federal Government “House Painter” (Missouri State Archives, Putman Collection) 104 OFFICIAL MANUAL Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Secu- rity; Alphonso Jackson, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; United States Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior; Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General; Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor; Government Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State; Norman Mineta, Secretary of Transportation; John Snow, Secretary of the Treasury; Executive Branch Jim Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs. The White House In addition to secretaries of the cabinet, the 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. president maintains a White House staff of advis- Washington, D.C. 20500 ers who serve at his pleasure. Telephone: (202) 456-1414 President Bush’s Executive Officers The president and the vice president of the with Cabinet Rank United States are elected every four years by a majority of votes cast in the electoral college. These Richard B. Cheney, Vice President; votes are cast by delegates from each state who Stephen Johnson, Environmental Protection vote in accordance, traditionally, with the majority Agency; of the state’s voters. States have as many electoral Joshua B. Bolten, Office of Management and college votes as they have congressional delegates. Budget; Missouri has 11 electoral college votes—one for Andrew H. Card Jr., Chief of Staff; each of the nine U.S. Congress districts and two for Rob Portman, U.S. Trade Representative; John Walters, Office of National Drug Control the state’s two seats in the U.S. Senate. Policy. The president is the chief executive of the Unit- ed States, with powers to command the armed Legislative Branch forces, control foreign policy, grant reprieves and The U.S. -
Indirect Constraints on the Office of Legal Counsel: Examining a Role for the Senate Judiciary Committee
Stanford Law Review Volume 73 June 2021 NOTE Indirect Constraints on the Office of Legal Counsel: Examining a Role for the Senate Judiciary Committee William S. Janover* Abstract. As arbiter of the constitutionality of executive actions, the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) possesses vast authority over the operation of the federal government and is one of the primary vessels for the articulation of executive power. It therefore is not surprising that the OLC has found itself at the center of controversy across Democratic and Republican administrations. OLC opinions have justified the obstruction of valid congressional investigations, the targeted killing of an American citizen overseas, repeated military incursions without congressional approval, and, most infamously, torture. These episodes have generated a significant body of proposals to reform, constrain, or altogether eliminate the OLC. All of these proposals can be categorized as either direct or indirect constraints on how the OLC operates. Direct constraints target how the OLC actually creates its legal work product. Indirect constraints instead focus on the OLC’s personnel or the public scrutiny the Office’s opinions will face. This Note expands on this existing body of research, focusing on how one institution unstudied in this context, the United States Senate Judiciary Committee, can operationalize meaningful indirect constraints on the OLC. Unlike the other actors that scholars have examined, the Committee’s position outside the executive branch allows it to sidestep the President’s ever-expanding reach within the federal bureaucracy. At the same time, the Committee’s oversight powers and its central role in the nomination of both the OLC’s leader and Article III judges give it important constitutional and statutory authority to constrain the Office. -
Five-Year Review of Executive Order 13112 on Invasive Species
THE NATIONAL INVASIVE SPECIES COUNCIL (NISC) Five-Year Review of Executive Order 13112 on Invasive Species Prepared for the Office of Management and Budget 2005 Meet the Invasive Species Challenge Know the NISC Plan Manage the Problem MEMBERS The Honorable Gale Norton The Honorable Mike Johanns The Honorable Carlos Gutierrez Co-Chair Co-Chair Co-Chair Secretary of the Interior Secretary of Agriculture Secretary of Commerce The Honorable Condoleezza Rice The Honorable Norman Y. Mineta The Honorable Donald H. Rumsfeld Secretary of State Secretary of Transportation Secretary of Defense The Honorable John Snow The Honorable Mike Leavitt The Honorable Michael Chertoff Secretary of the Treasury Secretary of Health and Human Secretary of Homeland Security Services The Honorable Stephen L. Johnson The Honorable Rob Portman Administrator The Honorable Michael Griffin U.S. Trade Representative Environmental Protection Agency Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mr. Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator U.S. Agency for International Development National Invasive Species Council Department of the Interior Office of the Secretary (OS/SIO/NISC) 1849 C Street, NW. Washington, DC 20240 www.invasivespecies.gov Suggested Citation: National Invasive Species Council. 2005. Five-Year Review of Executive Order 13112 on Invasive Species. 44 pp. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIVE-YEAR REVIEW OF EO 32 on INVASIVE SPECIES nvasive species inhabit all regions of the United Due to the broad and complex nature of invasive spe- States and every nation. The price society pays for cies, many agencies and departments across the Federal I invasives is reflected not only in significant economic Government play an important role in the response damage but also in high levels of environmental degra- to invasive species. -
Annual Report 2015 a Message from the Founders
LEADERSHIP | PUBLIC SERVICE | FELLOWSHIPS | SELF-SUFFICIENCY | FREE SYSTEMS | DIGNITY | LIBERTY ANNUAL REPORT 2015 A MESSAGE FROM THE FOUNDERS “WE ARE PLEASED TO REFLECT ON A YEAR OF CONTINUED GROWTH AND ADVANCES THROUGH OUR GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMS. IT HAS BEEN AN HONOR TO BE SUPPORTIVE OF MANY IMPRESSIVE INDIVIDUALS, ORGANIZATIONS AND CAUSES. WE REMAIN DEDICATED TO OUR WORK AND LOOK FORWARD TO MAKING FURTHER PROGRESS IN THE YEARS TO COME. OUR THANKS TO PARTNERS, SUPPORTERS AND FRIENDS OF THE FOUNDATION FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT, INTEREST AND SUPPORT.” -DON AND JOYCE RUMSFELD RUMSFELD FOUNDATION IN REVIEW 81 GRADUATE FELLOWS $3.9 MILLION + IN 135 CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASUS MILITARY GRANTS FELLOWS 3 GRADUATE FELLOWSHIP $3.7 MILLION + IN 4 CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASUS CONFERENCES MICROFINANCE GRANTS CONFERENCES Established in 2007, the Rumsfeld Foundation rewards leadership and public service at Mission home and supports the growth of free political and free economic systems abroad. REWARDING LEADERSHIP AND PUBLIC SERVICE AT HOME Effective leadership and dedicated public servants are essential for our country’s success. GRADUATE FELLOWSHIPS TROOPS Encouraging gifted scholars to Few have committed more in our serve the nation by pursuing a nation’s service than those who career in public service and have served and sacrificed in policy-relevant fields defense of our country ENCOURAGING THE GROWTH OF FREER SYSTEMS IN GREATER CENTRAL ASIA We believe free systems, economic and political, provide the most opportunities for their people. CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASUS -
The Commander-In-Chief and the Necessities of War: a Conceptual Framework
Loyola University Chicago, School of Law LAW eCommons Faculty Publications & Other Works 2011 The ommC ander-in-Chief and the Necessities of War: A Conceptual Framework John C. Dehn Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation John C. Dehn, The ommC ander-in-Chief and the Necessities of War: A Conceptual Framework, 83 Temp. L. Rev. 599 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEMPLE LAW REVIEW © 2011 TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION VOL. 83 NO. 3 SPRING 2011 ARTICLES THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF AND THE NECESSITIES OF WAR: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK * John C. Dehn While the current Administration has largely abandoned claims of plenary presidential authority to fight the nation’s wars, courts, scholars, and policy makers continue to debate the nature and scope of the powers conferred by the September 18, 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force. This Article examines primarily Supreme Court precedent to distill the general scope and limits of the President’s powers to fight the nation’s international and non-international armed conflicts. It concludes that the Supreme Court has expressly endorsed and consistently observed (although inconsistently applied) two concepts of necessity attributable to the Commander-in- Chief power. The first is military necessity: the power to employ all military measures not prohibited by applicable law and reasonably calculated to defeat a national enemy.