DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Beings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Beings Unit 15 T: 021 434 5366 Melbourne Business Park Model Farm Road E:[email protected] Cork www.ocallaghanmoran.com ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WASTE STORAGE INSTALLATION DUNDALK PORT, DUNDALK COUNTY LOUTH For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Prepared For: - O’Hanlon & Sons Contractors Ltd., 17 Mourne Vale, Avenue Road, Dundalk, County Louth July 2015 O’Hanlon & Sons Contractors EIS Dundalk Port July 2015 OCM EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:44:01 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY…………………………………………..….……..…… i PREAMBLE …………………………………………………………………..….……..…. vii 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 THE APPLICANT ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 INSTALLATION OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS ...................................................................................... 1-2 2 LOCAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL POLICY .................................................. 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 PLANNING ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY ................................................................................ 2-2 2.4 ENERGY POLICY ....................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGY .................................................................................. 2-4 2.6 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 2-5 3 ALTERNATIVES EXAMINED .................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES & SITE LAYOUT ....................................................... 3-1 3.4 THE DO NOTHING ALTERNATIVE ............................................................................. 3-1 4 INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION ............................................................................. 4-1 For inspection purposes only. 4.1 INTRODUCTION ................................Consent of copyright owner................................ required for any other use. ......................................... 4-1 4.2 LOCATION ................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.3 LAYOUT ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.4 SURROUNDING LAND USE ........................................................................................ 4-1 4.5 FACILITY MANAGEMENT & STAFFING ..................................................................... 4-1 4.6 HOURS OF OPERATION ............................................................................................. 4-6 4.7 WASTE TYPES & QUANTITIES .................................................................................. 4-6 4.8 WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND HANDLING ..................................................................... 4-6 4.9 RAW MATERIAL AND RESOURCE CONSUMPTION ..................................................... 4-7 4.10 SERVICES ................................................................................................................. 4-7 4.11 DRAINAGE ................................................................................................................ 4-7 4.12 WASTE GENERATION ............................................................................................... 4-7 4.13 INCIDENTS AND COMPLAINTS ................................................................................... 4-7 4.14 SAFETY AND HAZARD CONTROL .............................................................................. 4-7 4.15 EMISSIONS ................................................................................................................ 4-8 O’Hanlon & Sons Contractors Ltd EIS Dundalk Port I EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:44:01 5 CLIMATE ...................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 5-1 5.3 CURRENT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................ 5-1 5.4 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.5 IMPACTS ................................................................................................................... 5-2 5.6 DO NOTHING SCENARIO ........................................................................................... 5-2 5.7 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 5-2 5.8 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 5-2 5.9 RESIDUAL IMPACTS .................................................................................................. 5-3 6 TRAFFIC ....................................................................................................................... 6-1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 CURRENT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................ 6-1 6.3 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 6-1 6.4 IMPACTS ................................................................................................................... 6-2 6.5 DO NOTHING SCENARIO ........................................................................................... 6-4 6.6 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 6-4 6.7 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 6-4 6.8 RESIDUAL IMPACTS .................................................................................................. 6-4 7 SOILS AND GEOLOGY .............................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 7-1 7.3 CURRENT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................ 7-1 7.4 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 7-2 7.5 IMPACTS ................................................................................................................... 7-2 7.6 DO NOTHING SCENARIO ........................................................................................... 7-2 7.7 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 7-2 7.8 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ........................................................................................ 7-3 7.9 RESIDUAL IMPACTS ................................ For inspection purposes................................ only. .................................. 7-3 Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. 8 WATER .......................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1 METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 8-1 8.2 CURRENT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................ 8-1 8.3 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT-SURFACE WATER .......................................................... 8-2 8.4 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT-GROUNDWATER ............................................................ 8-5 8.5 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT – FLOOD RISK ................................................................ 8-9 8.6 IMPACTS ................................................................................................................... 8-9 8.7 DO NOTHING SCENARIO. .......................................................................................... 8-9 8.8 MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................... 8-9 8.9 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ...................................................................................... 8-11 8.10 RESIDUAL IMPACTS ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. Economic Development
    Dundalk and Environs Development Plan 5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Introduction and Context This chapter sets out the Councils policies and proposals, which are aimed at promoting and enabling economic development and tourism within the plan area. This chapter gives effect to the Strategic Objective for Economic Development. SO1 Assist in the development of Dundalk's Gateway status as a Regional Employment Growth Centre & Regional Shopping Destination. 5.1.1 National and Regional Context It is a priority of the National Development Plan 2000-2006 to promote sustainable growth and employment. The National Development Plan identifies key determinants of sustained economic performance, both nationally and regionally, and these include: • Ease of access to foreign and domestic markets. • A modern telecommunications network. • Back-up research and technology infrastructure which is accessible to enterprises in all sectors. • A well developed educational system. • A highly qualified and skilled workforce. • High quality physical infrastructure, including inter-urban transport and energy transmission systems. • An adequate supply of housing. • A good overall quality of life and; • A high quality and sustainable environment. The areas that are best endowed with these characteristics are generally the larger urban centres, which have a strategic location relative to their surrounding territory. These areas possess good social and economic infrastructure and support services, and have the potential to open up their zones of influence to further development. The cities and towns with this capability are envisaged in the National Development Plan as developmental “gateways”, able to drive growth throughout their zones of influence and Colin Buchanan and Partners 43 Dundalk and Environs Development Plan generate a dynamic of development that, which inclusively, recognises and exploits the relationship between city, town, village and rural area.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Long-Distance Coastal Sea Migration of Atlantic Salmon, Salmo Salar, Smolts from Northwest England (River Derwent)
    Evidence of Long-Distance Coastal Sea Migration of Atlantic Salmon, Salmo Salar, Smolts from Northwest England (River Derwent). Amy Green ( [email protected] ) University of Glasgow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0306-6457 Hannele Honkanen University of Glasgow Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine Philip Ramsden Environment Agency Brian Shields Environment Agency Diego Delvillar Loughs Agency Melanie Fletcher Natural England Silas Walton Natural England Richard Kennedy AFBI: Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Robert Rosell AFBI: Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Niall O'Maoiléidigh Marine Institute James Barry Inland Fisheries Ireland Fred Whoriskey Dalhousie University Peter Klimley University of California Davis Colin E Adams University of Glasgow Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine Short communication Keywords: Salmo salar, smolt, acoustic telemetry, migration, Irish Sea. Posted Date: August 13th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-789556/v1 Page 1/12 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 2/12 Abstract Combining data from multiple acoustic telemetry studies has revealed that west coast England Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts use a northward migration pathway through the Irish Sea to reach their feeding grounds. 100 Atlantic salmon smolts were tagged in May 2020 in the River Derwent, northwest England as part of an Environment Agency/Natural England funded project. Three tagged smolts were detected on marine acoustic receivers distributed across two separate arrays from different projects in the Irish Sea. One sh had migrated approximately 262km in 10 days from the river mouth at Workington Harbour, Cumbria to the northernmost receiver array operated by the SeaMonitor project; this is the longest tracked marine migration of an Atlantic salmon smolt migrating from United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Salmon Rivers
    Council CNL(05)45 Development of the NASCO Database of Irish Salmon Rivers - Report on Progress (Tabled by European Union – Ireland) CNL(05)45 Development of the NASCO Database of Irish Salmon Rivers - Report on Progress (Tabled by European Union – Ireland) Background In order to measure and improve progress in meeting the objective of the NASCO Plan of Action for Application of the Precautionary Approach to the Protection and Restoration of Atlantic Salmon Habitat, CNL(01)51, it is recommended that Contracting Parties and their relevant jurisdictions establish inventories of rivers to: - establish the baseline level of salmon production against which changes can be assessed; - provide a list of impacts responsible for reducing the productive capacity of rivers, so as to identify appropriate restoration plans. At the 2004 NASCO meeting the next steps in the development of the salmon rivers database were identified and agreed, CNL(04)38. The next steps are summarised below ((i) – (iii)) and the progress made by Ireland is identified. (i) Parties should agree to update the original NASCO rivers database annually (via the expanded web-based database) to correct errors and inconsistencies and conform to the new format. Progress On Updating the Original NASCO Rivers Database For Irish Rivers Previously, the Rivers Table on the NASCO rivers database for Ireland listed 192 Irish rivers. This list was drawn up several years ago and, on the basis of new information, it has been revised. Significant revisions follow McGinnity et al. (2003). This project involved identification (consultation with Fisheries Board Inspectors in the 17 Irish Fishery Districts and interrogation of extensive recent and archival juvenile population database) of all salmon (and sea trout) rivers in Ireland and an estimation of their size in terms usable river habitat area.
    [Show full text]
  • Neagh Bann CFRAM Study
    North Western - Neagh Bann CFRAM Study UoM 06 Hydrology Report IBE0700Rp0008 rpsgroup.com/ireland North Western – Neagh Bann CFRAM Study UoM06 Hydrology Report DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client OPW Project Title North Western – Neagh Bann CFRAM Study Document Title IBE0700Rp0008_UoM06 Hydrology Report_F03 Document No. IBE0700Rp0008 DCS TOC Text List of Tables List of Figures No. of This Document Appendices Comprises 1 1 166 1 1 4 Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date B. Quigley D01 Draft U. Mandal M. Brian G. Glasgow Belfast 24/10/2013 L. Arbuckle B. Quigley F01 Draft Final U. Mandal M. Brian G. Glasgow Belfast 03/04/2014 L. Arbuckle B. Quigley F02 Draft Final U. Mandal M. Brian G. Glasgow Belfast 14/08/2015 L. Arbuckle B. Quigley F03 Final U. Mandal M. Brian G. Glasgow Belfast 08/07/2016 L. Arbuckle rpsgroup.com/ireland Copyright Copyright - Office of Public Works. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Office of Public Works. Legal Disclaimer This report is subject to the limitations and warranties contained in the contract between the commissioning party (Office of Public Works) and RPS Group Ireland rpsgroup.com/ireland NW-NB CFRAM Study UoM 06 Hydrology Report –FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. IV LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for the Development of the Eel Fishery in Ireland
    ISSN 0332-4338 Strategy for the development of the eel fishery in Ireland by CHRISTOPHER MORIARTY MARINE INSTITUTE, FISHERIES RESEARCH CENTRE, ABBOTSTOWN, DUBLIN 15 Fisheries Bulletin No. 19 – 1999 Dublin The MARINE INSTITUTE, 80 HARCOURT STREET, DUBLIN 2 1999 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 BIOLOGY 7 2.1 Distribution 7 2.2 Life history 7 3 THE FISHERY 9 3.1 Glass eel and elver 9 3.2 Yellow eel 9 3.3 Silver eel 9 4 MANAGEMENT and MARKETING 11 4.1 Legislation 11 4.2 Bye-laws 14 4.3 Enforcement 15 4.4 Current management measures 15 4.5 Views of Central and Regional Fisheries Boards 16 4.6 Marketing 19 4.7 Processing 21 5 DEVELOPMENT 22 5.1 National and Regional Development 22 5.2 Personnel 22 5.3 Glass eel and elver development 22 5.4 Yellow eel fishery 22 5.5 Silver eel fishery 23 5.6 Major studies 23 5.7 Development and maintenance programme 23 6 REGIONAL STRATEGIES 26 6.1 Eastern Region 26 6.2 Southern Region 28 6.3 Southwestern Region 30 6.4 Shannon Region 31 6.5 Western Region 33 6.6 Northwestern Region 35 6.7 Northern Region 36 6.8 The Foyle 38 iii 7 AQUACULTURE 39 8 NATIONAL STRATEGY 40 8.1 Costs and benefits 40 8.2 Glass eel and elver 40 8.3 Yellow eel 41 8.4 Silver eel 41 8.5 Management proposals 42 9 ALL-IRELAND PERMANENT COMMISSION 45 10 REFERENCES 46 iv C.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Táin Bó Cúailnge?
    NEW Heritage Guide 69.qxp_H Guide no 31 rachel 26/05/2015 11:45 Page 1 What is Táin Bó Cúailnge? Táin Bó Cúailnge is the story of a cattle-raid reputed to have taken place during winter sometime around the time of Christ. Set in a rural, tribal and pagan Ireland, it is peopled with fearless warriors, haughty queens and kings and prize bulls (cover photo). It is often Heritage Guide No. 69 ranked alongside Ireland’s greatest literary classics and frequently described as ‘epic literature’. This sobriquet arises from its comparison to the heroic tales of Greece, and recent scholarship suggests that the stimulus for its composition was the translation of Togail Troí (Destruction of Troy) into Irish in the tenth century. The more traditional ‘nativist’ view sees the Táin as originating, fully formed, from oral tradition to be set down on vellum in the seventh century. What is clear is that Táin Bó Cúailnge is not unique but forms part of a small group of tána bó (cattle-raiding stories), themselves part of the Ulster Cycle, one of four great categories of by Castletown Mount alias Dún Dealgan alias Delga (Pl. 2), held in medieval Irish literature. This cycle comprises c. 50 stories, Táin Bó local tradition to be Cúchulainn’s foster-home. Continuing Cúailnge being acknowledged as the central tale. southwards, the cattle-raiders likely followed what is now the Táin Bó Cúailnge is preserved in a number of medieval Greyacre Road, part of an old routeway skirting Dundalk on the west. manuscripts, of which the Book of the Dun Cow (Lebor na hUidre, c.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of Ireland
    Sl. No River Name Length Comments 1 Abbert River 25.25 miles (40.64 km) 2 Aghinrawn Fermanagh 3 Agivey 20.5 miles (33.0 km) Londonderry 4 Aherlow River 27 miles (43 km) Tipperary 5 River Aille 18.5 miles (29.8 km) 6 Allaghaun River 13.75 miles (22.13 km) Limerick 7 River Allow 22.75 miles (36.61 km) Cork 8 Allow, 22.75 miles (36.61 km) County Cork (Blackwater) 9 Altalacky (Londonderry) 10 Annacloy (Down) 11 Annascaul (Kerry) 12 River Annalee 41.75 miles (67.19 km) 13 River Anner 23.5 miles (37.8 km) Tipperary 14 River Ara 18.25 miles (29.37 km) Tipperary 15 Argideen River 17.75 miles (28.57 km) Cork 16 Arigna River 14 miles (23 km) 17 Arney (Fermanagh) 18 Athboy River 22.5 miles (36.2 km) Meath 19 Aughavaud River, County Carlow 20 Aughrim River 5.75 miles (9.25 km) Wicklow 21 River Avoca (Ovoca) 9.5 miles (15.3 km) Wicklow 22 River Avonbeg 16.5 miles (26.6 km) Wicklow 23 River Avonmore 22.75 miles (36.61 km) Wicklow 24 Awbeg (Munster Blackwater) 31.75 miles (51.10 km) 25 Baelanabrack River 11 miles (18 km) 26 Baleally Stream, County Dublin 27 River Ballinamallard 16 miles (26 km) 28 Ballinascorney Stream, County Dublin 29 Ballinderry River 29 miles (47 km) 30 Ballinglen River, County Mayo 31 Ballintotty River, County Tipperary 32 Ballintra River 14 miles (23 km) 33 Ballisodare River 5.5 miles (8.9 km) 34 Ballyboughal River, County Dublin 35 Ballycassidy 36 Ballyfinboy River 20.75 miles (33.39 km) 37 Ballymaice Stream, County Dublin 38 Ballymeeny River, County Sligo 39 Ballynahatty 40 Ballynahinch River 18.5 miles (29.8 km) 41 Ballyogan Stream, County Dublin 42 Balsaggart Stream, County Dublin 43 Bandon 45 miles (72 km) 44 River Bann (Wexford) 26 miles (42 km) Longest river in Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Dundalk Bay SAC (Site Code 455) Conservation Objectives Supporting Document ‐Coastal Habitats
    Dundalk Bay SAC (site code 455) Conservation objectives supporting document ‐coastal habitats Version 1 March 2011 Table of Contents Page No. 1 Introduction 2 2 Conservation objectives 3 3 Perennial vegetation of stony banks 3 3.1 Overall objective 3 3.2 Area 3 3.2.1 Habitat extent 3 3.3 Range 4 3.3.1 Habitat distribution 4 3.4 Structure and Functions 4 3.4.1 Functionality and sediment supply 4 3.4.2 Vegetation structure: zonation 4 3.4.3 Vegetation composition: typical species & sub-communities 4 3.4.4 Vegetation composition: negative indicator species 5 4 Saltmarsh habitats 5 4.1 Overall objectives 5 4.2 Area 6 4.2.1 Habitat extent 6 4.3 Range 6 4.3.1 Habitat distribution 6 4.4 Structure and Functions 7 4.4.1 Physical structure: sediment supply 7 4.4.2 Physical structure: creeks and pans 7 4.4.3 Physical structure: flooding regime 7 4.4.4 Vegetation structure: zonation 7 4.4.5 Vegetation structure: vegetation height 8 4.4.6 Vegetation structure: vegetation cover 8 4.4.7 Vegetation composition: typical species & sub-communities 8 4.4.8 Vegetation composition: negative indicator species 9 5 References 9 Appendix I: Dundalk Bay report and habitat map 10 1 1 Introduction Achieving Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) is the overall objective to be reached for all Annex I habitat types and Annex II species of European Community interest listed in the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC (Commission of the European Communities, 2003). It is defined in positive terms, such that a habitat type or species must be prospering and have good prospects of continuing to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Aquatic Radiation Pathways in Ireland, 2008
    Cefas contract report C3030 An assessment of aquatic radiation pathways in Ireland, 2008 Environment Report RL 16/08 Conducted on behalf of the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland An assessment of aquatic radiation pathways in Ireland, 2008 Environment Report RL 16/08 The Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Lowestoft Laboratory Pakefield Road Lowestoft NR33 0HT F.J. Clyne, C.J. Garrod, T.M. Jeffs and S.B. Jenkinson 2008 The work in this report was completed under contract to the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland. Cefas Contract C3030 2 CONTENTS SUMMARY 5 1. INTRODUCTION 8 2. THE HABITS SURVEY 9 2.1 Survey aims 9 2.2 Conduct of the survey 9 3. HABITS DATA RECORDING AND MANIPULATION 10 3.1 Data recording 10 3.2 Data manipulation 10 4. SURVEY AREAS 12 4.1 Coastal survey area 12 4.2 Ports to the south of the coastal survey area 15 5. COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 17 5.1 Capture fisheries 17 5.2 Aquaculture 19 5.3 Hand collection of molluscan shellfish 19 5.4 Marketing of fish and shellfish 20 6. NON-COMMERCIAL FISHERIES 21 6.1 Angling 21 6.2 Hobby fishing 21 6.3 Shellfish collection from the shore 22 7. EXTERNAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS 23 7.1 Intertidal activities 23 7.2 Activities in and on water 24 8. UNUSUAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS 26 8.1 Use of seaweed as a fertiliser 26 8.2 Seaweed consumption 26 8.3 Sand extraction 26 8.4 Livestock grazing on salt marsh 26 8.5 Wildfowling 26 8.6 Dredging navigational channels 26 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of the M1 Dundalk Western Bypass Niall Roycroft
    7. Around the bay on the Great North Road: the archaeology of the M1 Dundalk Western Bypass Niall Roycroft FAUGHART LOWER 5 CARN MORE 5 CARN MORE 1 BALRIGGAN 1 FORT HILL FAUGHART LOWER 6 BALREGAN 1 TATEETRA 1 FAUGHART LOWER 1 NEWTOWNBALREGAN 6 NEWTOWNBALREGAN 5 NEWTOWNBALREGAN 7 NEWTOWNBALREGAN 2 DONAGHMORE 1 LITTLEMILL 4 LITTLEMILL 2 LITTLEMILL 1 Illus. 1—General site location map showing excavated sites along the route of the M1 Dundalk Western Bypass (Meath County Council National Roads Design Office, based on the Ordnance Survey Ireland map) Dundalk is a beautiful place. The bay and harbour sweep in from the Irish Sea, overlooked by the south-facing slopes of the Cooley Mountains, Black Mountain and Slieve Gullien. Castletown-Dundalk nestles in a sheltered spot on the ancient Gap of the North/Great North Road (roughly the present N1), controlling a port and a fertile, rolling hinterland. This area is immensely rich regarding archaeological sites and the land is steeped in legends of Cú Chullain, Fin MacCool and the Cattle Raid of Cooley (Taín Bó Cúailnge), as well as medieval conflict such as the Battle of Faughart, which ended the Bruce invasions in AD 1318. The M1 Dundalk Western Bypass is part of the northern end of the M1 motorway, which currently comes from Dublin Airport and will soon reach the border with Northern Ireland at County Armagh, before continuing to Newry. The advance archaeological works were commissioned by Louth County Council and the NRA, and the main construction 65 Recent Archaeological Discoveries on National Road Schemes 2004 works were undertaken by Celtic Roads Group Dundalk Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Newry-Fane-Glyde-Dee Catchment Assessment 2010-2015 (HA 06)
    Newry-Fane-Glyde-Dee Catchment Assessment 2010-2015 (HA 06) Catchment Science & Management Unit Environmental Protection Agency December 2018 Version no. 3 Preface This document provides a summary of the characterisation outcomes for the water resources of the Newry-Fane-Glyde-Dee Catchment, which have been compiled and assessed by the EPA, with the assistance of local authorities and RPS consultants. The information presented includes status and risk categories of all water bodies, details on protected areas, significant issues, significant pressures, load reduction assessments, recommendations on future investigative assessments, areas for actions and environmental objectives. The characterisation assessments are based on information available to the end of 2015. Additional, more detailed characterisation information is available to public bodies on the EPA WFD Application via the EDEN portal, and more widely on the catchments.ie website. The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the situation in the catchment and help inform further action and analysis of appropriate measures and management strategies. This document is supported by, and can be read in conjunction with, a series of other documents which provide explanations of the elements it contains: 1. An explanatory document setting out the full characterisation process, including water body, subcatchment and catchment characterisation. 2. The Final River Basin Management Plan, which can be accessed on: www.catchments.ie. 3. A published paper on Source Load Apportionment Modelling, which can be accessed at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3318/bioe.2016.22 4. A published paper on the role of pathways in transferring nutrients to streams and the relevance to water quality management strategies, which can be accessed at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/10.3318/bioe.2016.19.pdf 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Dublin Port Is Where It Is
    Dublin Port Post 2040 Dialogue – Paper 1 WHY DUBLIN PORT IS WHERE IT IS 28th September 2020 The Danish academic, Bent Flyvbjerg, unforeseeable risks which cannot be transferred to contractors except at enormous cost, and at levels most defines megaprojects as large-scale, complex project promoters would balk at. ventures that typically cost $1 billion or more, take many years to develop and The capacity of megaprojects to waste capital is enormous and, particularly where public money is build, involve multiple public and private involved, it is unquestionably a good thing to avoid a stakeholders, are transformational, and megaproject if at all possible. 1 impact millions of people . A good starting point to thinking about the project to build new port facilities on the east coast of Ireland is to The 20 year project to build new port infrastructure understand why Dublin Port is where it is. on the east coast of Ireland is, by this definition, a megaproject. The definition applies equally to the project All ports are the product of large scale anthropogenic to build new port facilities to augment the existing interventions into the natural environment and it is in facilities in Dublin Port or to the project to build a the nature of ports that the scale of this intervention, replacement port which would allow the lands of Dublin being underwater, is not readily visible nor easily Port to be redeveloped for other purposes. Dublin Port appreciated. Such interventions are needed to provide Company is planning on the basis that it may have to the fundamental prerequisite for any port – an access build the former.
    [Show full text]