DOCSLIB.ORG

Manipulation of 3D Objects in Immersive Virtual Environments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Manipulation of 3D Objects in Immersive Virtual Environments PhD Dissertation Proposal Manipulation of 3D Objects in Immersive Virtual Environments Daniel Filipe Martins Tavares Mendes [email protected] September 2015 Abstract Interactions within virtual environments (VE) often require manipu- lation of 3D virtual objects. For this purpose, several research have been carried out focusing on mouse, touch and gestural input. While exist- ing mid-air gestures in immersive VE (IVE) can offer natural manipula- tions, mimicking interactions with physical objects, they cannot achieve the same levels of precision attained with mouse-based applications for computer-aided design (CAD). Following prevailing trends in previous research, such as degrees-of- freedom (DOF) separation, virtual widgets and scaled user motion, we intend to explore techniques for IVEs that combine the naturalness of mid-air gestures and the precision found in traditional CAD systems. In this document we survey and discuss the state-of-the-art in 3D object manipulation. With challenges identified, we present a research proposal and corresponding work plan. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Background and Related Work 4 2.1 Key players . .4 2.2 Relevant events and journals . .5 2.3 Virtual Environments Overview . .7 2.4 Mouse and Keyboard based 3D Interaction . .9 2.5 3D Manipulation on Interactive Surfaces . 12 2.6 Touching Stereoscopic Tabletops . 16 2.7 Mid-Air Interactions . 17 2.8 Within Immersive Virtual Environments . 20 2.9 Discussion . 25 3 Research Proposal 28 3.1 Problem . 28 3.2 Hypotheses . 28 3.3 Objectives . 29 4 Preliminary Study of Mid-Air Manipulations 31 4.1 Implemented Techniques . 31 4.2 User Evaluation . 32 4.3 Results . 33 5 Work Plan 34 5.1 Past: 2013 / 2014 . 34 5.2 Present: 2015 . 34 5.3 Future: 2016 / 2017 . 36 References 37 2 1 Introduction Since the early days of virtual environments that moving, rotating and resizing virtual objects have been target of research. Considering three-dimensional virtual environments, these kind of manipulations are not trivial, mainly due to the required mapping between traditional input devices (2D) and the virtual environment (3D). Most common solutions resort to techniques that somehow relate the actions performed in the two-dimensional space of the input device (e.g. mouse cursor or touch) to three-dimensional transformations. Since it is usual for people to interact with these kind of environments with traditional displays, 3D content is displayed in a 2D rendered image, which hin- ders content's perception. To overcome both the limitations of the input and the output devices, mainstream solutions for creating and editing 3D virtual con- tent, namely computer-aided design (CAD) tools, resort to different orthogonal views of the environment. This allows a more direct two-dimensional interaction with limited degrees of freedom. Solutions that offer a single perspective view usually either apply the transformation in a plane parallel to the view plane, or resort to widgets that constraint interactions and ease the 2D-3D mapping. Research has shown that the first approach can sometimes result in unexpected transformations when users are allowed to freely navigate through the virtual environment, and that constrained interactions allow for more accurate manip- ulations. Recent technological advances lead to an increased interest in immersive vir- tual reality settings. Affordable hardware for immersive visualization of virtual environments, such as the Oculus Rift head-mounted display (HMD), ease the perception of three-dimensional content. Moreover, advances in user tracking solutions make possible to know where users' head, limbs and hands are in space. This allows for more direct interactions, mimicking the ones with physical ob- jects. First results of our work showed that mid-air direct interactions with 3D virtual content can reduce tasks' duration and are appealing to users. Although mid-air interactions show promising results, the accuracy of hu- man spatial interactions is limited. Moreover, the limited dexterity of mid-air hand gestures, aggravated by the low-definition of current HMDs, constrain pre- cise manipulations. This precision is of extreme importance when creating or assembling engineering models or architectural mock-ups. Inspired by previous research that focused on mouse- and touch-based in- teractions, we intend to explore different techniques to increase users' precision for mid-air interactions, when working with 3D virtual models. Our objective is to combine the naturalness of everyday physical interactions with the precision that is only possible with computer systems. We expect to develop techniques that, albeit being less natural than the ones that strictly copy physical world interactions, offer more controlled and precise manipulations. In the remainder of this document we will present some background and the state-of-the-art regarding 3D object manipulations within virtual environments. With open challenges identified, we introduce those we intend to tackle, referring which are our research hypothesis and objectives. We will then propose an approach to our research for the following couple of years. 3 2 Background and Related Work Objects' manipulation in virtual environments have been subject of previous research. In this section we will cover the more relevant works in this field, ranging from manipulation using traditional input devices, such as mouse and keyboard, to more recent approaches that rely on mid-air interactions to interact with objects displayed through stereoscopic imagery. But, before we do so, we will present the main research groups and individuals that have been carrying those research and the most relevant venues where this kind of work has been being published in. 2.1 Key players Several people conducted research on how to improve interaction in 3D vir- tual environments. Below are presented some of the research groups that have created valuable contributions. Natural Interaction Research group at Microsoft Research This group1 aims to enrich and reimagine the human-computer interface. Their team ex- plores a wide variety of interaction topics including sensing and display hard- ware, touch and stylus input, spatial and augmented reality, and user modeling. Among others, notable names appear in their team: Bill Buxton, Andy Wilson and Hrvoje Benko. HCI group at the University of Hamburg This group2 explores perceptu- ally-inspired and (super-)natural forms of interaction to seamlessly couple the space where the flat 2D digital world meets the three dimensions we live in. Their research is driven by understanding the human perceptual, cognitive and motor skills and limitations in order to reform the interaction as well as the experience in computer-mediated realities. The group is led by Frank Steinicke, who is also responsible for taking part in the organization of relevant conferences in the field, namely ACM SUI and IEEE 3DUI. Working also in this group, Gerd Bruder, a postdoctoral researcher, and Paul Lubos, a PhD candidate, have been working in 3D user interfaces for immersive environments. Potioc at Inria Bordeaux The overall objective of Potioc3 is to design, to develop, and to evaluate new approaches that provide rich interaction expe- riences between users and the digital world. They are interested in popular interaction, mainly targeted at the general public. They explore input and out- put modalities that go beyond standard interaction approaches which are based on mice/keyboards and (touch)screens. Similarly, they are interested in 3D con- tent that offer new opportunities compared to traditional 2D contexts. More precisely, Potioc explores interaction approaches that rely notably on interac- tive 3D graphics, augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), tangible interaction, brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and physiological interfaces. Martin Hachet leads this group, whose main area of interest is 3D User Interaction. One of the 1Natural Interaction Research group: research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/natural/ 2HCI group at the University of Hamburg: www.inf.uni-hamburg.de/en/inst/ab/hci 3Potioc: team.inria.fr/potioc 4 former members of this group, Aur´elieCoh´e,explored widget based manipula- tions for 3D object in her PhD. MINT The MINT team4 focuses on gestural interaction, i.e. the use of ges- ture for human-computer interaction. In the particular context of HCI, they are more specifically interested in users' movements that a computing system can sense and respond to. Their goal is to foster the emergence of new interactions, to further broaden the use of gesture by supporting more complex operations. They are developing the scientific and technical foundations required to facili- tate the design, implementation and evaluation of these interactions. This team is led by Laurent Grisoni, and one of their alumni is Anthony Martinet, whose PhD focused on techniques for 3D object manipulation for multi-touch displays. InnoVis at the Unniversity of Calgary InnoVis5 was founded and is di- rected by Sheelagh Carpendale. They investigate innovations in the area of Information Visualization and Human Computer Interaction. Active research topics in Information Visualization include the exploration of effective use of display space, and navigation, exploration, and manipulation of information spaces. In the context of Human Computer Interaction members of the lab study how to best support collaborative work on large displays. One of their former PhD students, Mark Hancock, made great contributions to the field
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces
    2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR 2020) Atlanta , Georgia, USA 22 – 26 March 2020 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP20VIR-POD ISBN: 978-1-7281-5609-5 Copyright © 2020 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright and Reprint Permissions: Abstracting is permitted with credit to the source. Libraries are permitted to photocopy beyond the limit of U.S. copyright law for private use of patrons those articles in this volume that carry a code at the bottom of the first page, provided the per-copy fee indicated in the code is paid through Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. For other copying, reprint or republication permission, write to IEEE Copyrights Manager, IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. All rights reserved. *** This is a print representation of what appears in the IEEE Digital Library. Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. IEEE Catalog Number: CFP20VIR-POD ISBN (Print-On-Demand): 978-1-7281-5609-5 ISBN (Online): 978-1-7281-5608-8 ISSN: 2642-5246 Additional Copies of This Publication Are Available From: Curran Associates, Inc 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: (845) 758-0400 Fax: (845) 758-2633 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) VR 2020 Table of Contents General Chairs Message xix Conference Paper Program Chairs Message xx IEEE Visualization and Graphics Technical
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of Virtual Reality Menu Interaction and Design
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 4-30-2021 An empirical study of virtual reality menu interaction and design Emily Salmon Wall [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Wall, Emily Salmon, "An empirical study of virtual reality menu interaction and design" (2021). Theses and Dissertations. 5161. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/5161 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Template C with Schemes v4.1 (beta): Created by L. 11/15/19 An empirical study of virtual reality menu interaction and design By TITLE PAGE Emily Salmon Wall Approved by: Reuben F. Burch V (Major Professor) Michael Hamilton Daniel Carruth Brian Smith Ginnie Hsu Linkan Bian (Graduate Coordinator) Jason M. Keith (Dean, Bagley College of Engineering) A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial and Systems Engineering in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Mississippi State, Mississippi April 2021 Copyright by COPYRIGHT PAGE Emily Salmon Wall 2021 Name: Emily Salmon Wall ABSTRACT Date of Degree: April 30, 2021 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Industrial and Systems Engineering Major Professor: Reuben F. Burch V Title of Study: An empirical study of virtual reality menu interaction and design Pages in Study: 181 Candidate for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy This study focused on three different menu designs each with their own unique interactions and organizational structures to determine which design features would perform the best.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time 3D Graphic Augmentation of Therapeutic Music Sessions for People on the Autism Spectrum
    Real-time 3D Graphic Augmentation of Therapeutic Music Sessions for People on the Autism Spectrum John Joseph McGowan Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Edinburgh Napier University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2018 Declaration I, John McGowan, declare that the work contained within this thesis has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. Furthermore, the thesis is the result of the student’s own independent work. Published material associated with the thesis is detailed within the section on Associate Publications. Signed: Date: 12th October 2019 J J McGowan Abstract i Abstract This thesis looks at the requirements analysis, design, development and evaluation of an application, CymaSense, as a means of improving the communicative behaviours of autistic participants through therapeutic music sessions, via the addition of a visual modality. Autism spectrum condition (ASC) is a lifelong neurodevelopmental disorder that can affect people in a number of ways, commonly through difficulties in communication. Interactive audio-visual feedback can be an effective way to enhance music therapy for people on the autism spectrum. A multi-sensory approach encourages musical engagement within clients, increasing levels of communication and social interaction beyond the sessions. Cymatics describes a resultant visualised geometry of vibration through a variety of mediums, typically through salt on a brass plate or via water. The research reported in this thesis focuses on how an interactive audio-visual application, based on Cymatics, might improve communication for people on the autism spectrum. A requirements analysis was conducted through interviews with four therapeutic music practitioners, aimed at identifying working practices with autistic clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive and Explorable 360 VR System with Visual Guidance User Interfaces
    RealNodes: Interactive and Explorable 360◦ VR System with Visual Guidance User Interfaces ABSTRACT Emerging research expands the idea of using 360-degree panora- mas of the real-world for “360 VR” experiences beyond video and image viewing. However, most of these are strictly guided, with few opportunities for interaction or exploration. There is a desire for experiences with cohesive virtual environments with choice in navigation, versus scripted experiences with limited interaction. Un- like standard VR with the freedom of synthetic graphics, there are challenges in designing user interfaces (UIs) for 360 VR navigation within the limitations of fixed assets. We designed RealNodes, a novel software system that presents an interactive and explorable 360 VR environment. We also developed four visual guidance UIs for 360 VR navigation. The results of a comparative study of these UIs determined that choice of user interface (UI) had a significant effect on task completion times, showing one of the methods, Ar- row, was best. Arrow also exhibited positive but non-significant trends in preference, user engagement, and simulator-sickness. Re- alNodes and the comparative study contribute preliminary results that inspire future investigation of how to design effective visual guidance metaphors for navigation in applications using novel 360 VR environments. Keywords: Immersive / 360° video; 3D user interaction; Non- fatiguing 3DUIs; Locomotion and navigation; 3DUI metaphors; Computer graphics techniques Index Terms: Human-centered computing—Human computer Figure 1: Images from the RealNodes software displaying the four interaction (HCI)—Interaction paradigms—Virtual Reality; Human- types of visual guidance UI. (Top-left) Target; (Top-right) Arrow; centered computing—Interaction design —Interaction design pro- (Bottom-left) Path; (Bottom-right) Ripple.
    [Show full text]
  • The Openxr Specification
    The OpenXR Specification Copyright (c) 2017-2021, The Khronos Group Inc. Version 1.0.19, Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:39:15 +0000: from git ref release-1.0.19 commit: 808fdcd5fbf02c9f4b801126489b73d902495ad9 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . 2 1.1. What is OpenXR?. 2 1.2. The Programmer’s View of OpenXR. 2 1.3. The Implementor’s View of OpenXR . 2 1.4. Our View of OpenXR. 3 1.5. Filing Bug Reports. 3 1.6. Document Conventions . 3 2. Fundamentals . 5 2.1. API Version Numbers and Semantics. 5 2.2. String Encoding . 7 2.3. Threading Behavior . 7 2.4. Multiprocessing Behavior . 8 2.5. Runtime . 8 2.6. Extensions. 9 2.7. API Layers. 9 2.8. Return Codes . 16 2.9. Handles . 23 2.10. Object Handle Types . 24 2.11. Buffer Size Parameters . 25 2.12. Time . 27 2.13. Duration . 28 2.14. Prediction Time Limits . 29 2.15. Colors. 29 2.16. Coordinate System . 30 2.17. Common Object Types. 33 2.18. Angles . 36 2.19. Boolean Values . 37 2.20. Events . 37 2.21. System resource lifetime. 42 3. API Initialization. 43 3.1. Exported Functions . 43 3.2. Function Pointers . 43 4. Instance. 47 4.1. API Layers and Extensions . 47 4.2. Instance Lifecycle . 53 4.3. Instance Information . 58 4.4. Platform-Specific Instance Creation. 60 4.5. Instance Enumerated Type String Functions. 61 5. System . 64 5.1. Form Factors . 64 5.2. Getting the XrSystemId . 65 5.3. System Properties . 68 6. Path Tree and Semantic Paths.
    [Show full text]
  • CAP 6121: 3D User Interfaces for Games and Virtual Reality Spring 2011; MW 4:30Pm-5:45Pm HEC -0111
    1 CAP 6121: 3D User Interfaces for Games and Virtual Reality Spring 2011; MW 4:30pm-5:45pm HEC -0111 Instructor: Dr. Joseph J. LaViola Jr. Website: www.eecs.ucf.edu/courses/cap6121/spr11/ Office Hours: T: 4:00pm-5:30pm Office: ENGRIII – 321, phone: x2285 W: 5:45pm-6:45pm [email protected] READINGS: Text: Bowman, D., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J., and Poupyrev, I. 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice, Addison Wesley, July 2004. Creighton, Ryan H. Unity 3D Game Development by Example, Packt Publishing, 2010. Papers: student/professor selected research papers Catalog Description: 3D user interaction, spatial user interfaces, selection and manipulation, 3D navigation, system control, evaluation methodologies, augmented and mixed reality, input and output hardware Course Objectives: 3D User Interfaces for Games and Virtual Reality is a course designed to give students a rigorous introduction to the design, implementation, and evaluation of the fundamental techniques in spatial 3D interaction. Student Requirements: 1. Star Wars Game -- Students will create a lightsaber game where they control the saber with and use the force using the Microsoft Kinect. 2. 3D Pac-Man -- Students will create a 3D Pac-Man game where they will travel through a maze using the using the Microsoft Kinect. 3. Game UI paper -- Students will examine existing 3D user interaction techniques and see how they can be applied in a video game setting. 4. Paper Presentations -- Students will have to present at least one paper on a topic in 3DUIs. 5. Final Project -- Students will do a final project of their choice that explores a particular concept in 3D user interfaces tailored to video games.
    [Show full text]
  • For STEM Teachers
    75 SHS W eb o f Conferences , 04015 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207504015 ICHTML 2020 The course “Development of virtual and AR software” for STEM teachers Mykhailo Mintii* Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 54, Gagarina Ave., Kryvyi Rih, 50086, Ukraine Abstract. The article looks into the experience of development and using of learning resources for design of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) systems for future STEM teachers. Unity environment for visual design, Visual Studio as a programming environment, platform of VR (Google VR) and AR (Vuforia) were chosen for development of teaching materials. The article describes the content of the created course. The research analyzes the impressions of the course participants. The research data were collected using interviews as the method of qualitative data collection. To conclude, the created course promotes the development of digital competence in the design and use of innovative learning tools. 1 Introduction Analytics, Digital Experience Platforms, Engagement Hub, 360-Degree View, Chatbots, Conversational User The technology of AR is well-known for most of people. Interfaces, Consumer Messaging Applications, Emotion It was under the close attention of Gartner analysts for Detection/Recognition, NLP, some disappointment is many years. On July 2019, the Gartner Hype Cycle for observed in VideoCalling, In-App Mobile Customer Customer Service and Support Technologies reflected Service, Robotic Process Automation Software, Voice of the increasing attention for such technologies as the Customer. According to analysts at Gartner, it will Blockchain, Field Service Drones, Mediated Interaction take 5-10 years for AR to reach the performance plateau Matching, Things as Customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual and Augmented Reality
    1 Virtual and Augmented Reality Mike Bailey [email protected] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License “Reality, what a concept!” -- Robin Williams Computer Graphics VrAr.pptx mjb – August 12, 2021 Virtual Reality Definition 2 Virtual reality (VR) is a simulated experience that can be similar to or completely different from the real world. Applications of virtual reality can include entertainment (i.e. video games) and educational purposes (i.e. medical or military training). Other, distinct types of VR style technology include augmented reality and mixed reality, sometimes referred to as extended reality or XR. Currently standard virtual reality systems use either virtual reality headsets or multi-projected environments to generate realistic images, sounds and other sensations that simulate a user's physical presence in a virtual environment. A person using virtual reality equipment is able to look around the artificial world, move around in it, and interact with virtual features or items. The effect is commonly created by VR headsets consisting of a head-mounted display with a small screen in front of the eyes, but can also be created through specially designed rooms with multiple large screens. Virtual reality typically incorporates auditory and video feedback, but may also allow other types of sensory and force feedback through haptic technology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality Computer Graphics mjb – August 12, 2021 3 VR Headsets Uses shaders
    [Show full text]
  • Go Beyond the Screen: the Evolution and Design Pressures of Viewership, from Hollywood to Silicon Valley
    Go beyond the screen: the evolution and design pressures of viewership, from Hollywood to Silicon Valley Adrian Langtry A research Paper submitted to the University of Dublin, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Interactive Digital Media 2016 Declaration I have read and I understand the plagiarism provisions in the General Regulations of the University Calendar for the current year, found at: http://www.tcd.ie/calendar I have also completed the Online Tutorial on avoiding plagiarism ‘Ready, Steady, Write,’ located at http://tcd- ie.libguides.com/plagiarism/ready-steady-write I declare that the work described in this research Paper is, except where otherwise stated, entirely my own work and has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university. Signed: _____________________ Adrian Langtry 10/05/16 Permission to lend and/or copy I agree that Trinity College Library may lend or copy this research Paper upon request. Signed: _____________________ Adrian Langtry 10/05/2016 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Donal O’Mahony for introducing me to augmented and virtual reality through the world of design, and for his help and guidance in forming the structure of this research paper with invaluable feedback as research paper supervisor. With thanks to the love and support of my family, Interactive Digital Media classmates, and the collective studying hive-mind of postgraduate students in the 1937 Reading Room that helped me focus. Abstract This paper investigates the possible disappearance of the screen with the evolution and design pressures of viewership in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Techniques and Architectures for 3D Interaction About the Cover the Cover Depicts the Embedding of 3D Structures in Both Space and Mind
    Techniques and Architectures for 3D Interaction About the cover The cover depicts the embedding of 3D structures in both space and mind. At a quick glance or when viewed at an angle or curved page, the structures appear carefully organized. Closer inspection reveals that the shapes are all tilted at different angles. The background image was ray traced in the Blender 3D content creation suite, us- ing subsurface scattering for the curved surface and ambient occlusion to emphasize structure. The final cover was typeset in Inkscape, with the BitStream Vera Serif font. Techniques and Architectures for 3D Interaction Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. ir. J.T. Fokkema, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 2 september 2009 om 10:00 uur door Gerwin DE HAAN informatica ingenieur geboren te Rotterdam. Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. ir. F.W. Jansen Copromotor: Ir. F.H. Post Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus voorzitter Prof. dr. ir. F.W. Jansen Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Ir. F.H. Post Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. dr. I.E.J.R. Heynderickx Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. A. van Deursen Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. ir. P.J.M. van Oosterom Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. ir. R. van Liere Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Prof. dr. B. Frohlich¨ Bauhaus-Universitat¨ Weimar This work was carried out in the ASCI graduate school. ASCI dissertation series number 180. Part of this research has been funded by the Dutch BSIK/BRICKS project (MSV2).
    [Show full text]
  • 1-2-4 Openxr
    © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 1 Unifying Reality Standardizing XR: OpenXR Brent E. Insko, PhD Lead VR Architect at Intel & OpenXR Working Group Chair 3GPP, VRIF & AIS Workshop on VR Ecosystem & Standards, April 2019 © Khronos® Group Inc. 2019 - Page 2 Agenda • What is OpenXR? • A Brief History of the Standard • What are the Problems we are trying to Solve • OpenXR Timeline of Development • Provisional Release • What’s Next? • Recap • Call To Action • Questions © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 3 OpenXR Provisional 0.90 Released! Press announcement Updated landing page © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 4 What is OpenXR? OpenXR is a royalty-free, open standard that provides high-performance access to Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR)—collectively known as XR—platforms and devices. © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 5 A Brief History of OpenXR • Among the first VR hardware available 2016 • Need applications… - Each platform provided an SDK to interface with the hardware - Each was different from the other © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 6 XR Ecosystem Fragmentation •Increased development time and therefore cost. •Increased validation overhead and therefore cost. •Time and resources spent developing one title, impacts developers’ ability to create more titles. © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 7 Major XR Runtimes © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 8 VR Barriers to Adoption… •Content •Comfort •Cost © The Khronos® Group Inc. 2018 - Page 9 OpenXR • Recognizing the problem, several companies got together in late 2016 / early 2017 and formed the OpenXR working group in Khronos. Virtual Reality V A Augmented Reality © The Khronos® Group Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th Century 3DUI Bib: Annotated Bibliography of 3D User Interfaces of the 20Th Century
    20th Century 3DUI Bib: Annotated Bibliography of 3D User Interfaces of the 20th Century Compiled by Ivan Poupyrev and Ernst Kruijff, 1999, 2000, 3rd revision Contributors: Bowman, D., Billinghurst, M., Cugini, J., Dachselt, R.,Hinckley, K., LaViola, J., Lindeman, R., Pierce, J., Steed, A., Stuerzlinger,W. to submit contributions to the bib e-mail to [email protected] or [email protected] 1. Adelstein, B., Johnston, E., Ellis, S., A testbed for Charac- 6. Badler, N., Manoochehri, K., Baraff, D., Multi-Dimensional terizing Dynamic Response of Virtual Environment Spatial Input Techniques and Articulated Figure Positioning by Sensors. Proceedings of UIST'92. 1992. ACM. pp. 15. Multiple Constraints. Proceedings of Workshop on Inter- Keywords: input devices, sensor lag, spatial sensors, active 3D Graphics. 1986. ACM. pp. 151-169. system calibration Keywords: multi-dimensional input, jacks, constraints, Annotations: This paper describes a testbed for measur- clutching, physical props ing the latency of spatial sensors, but unlike Liang et al. Annotations: This paper describes an attempt to add [UIST'91 paper] it does not suggest specific filtering multi-dimensional input, using a Polhemus tracker, to an methods. Unlike previous related work, this study meas- early version of Badler's "Jack" articulated figure position- ures the performance of the sensor alone. Factors such ing system. The Polhemus ("wand") was used in two as code execution time, inter-process communication modes: absolute and relative. Absolute positioning was time, and rendering time do not distort the results. fatiguing. Relative motion allowed the user to move the wand (by releasing the button) when an uncomfortable 2.
    [Show full text]