The Development and Use of the Zoom Lens in American Film and Television: 1946-1974

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Development and Use of the Zoom Lens in American Film and Television: 1946-1974 The development and use of the zoom lens in American film and television: 1946-1974 Submitted by Nick Hall to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English, September 2012. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… Hall 3 Abstract This dissertation documents two aspects of the development and use of zoom lenses in American film and television from 1946 to 1974. It contributes a detailed account of the impact of Zoomar lenses on early postwar American television, and of the later role of ‘TV Generation’ creative figures who started their careers in television before becoming feature directors. Chapter 1 introduces the study and defines key terms used throughout. Chapter 2 includes a comprehensive literature review of existing critical and historical approaches to the zoom lens. Chapter 3 outlines methodologies for source selection and analysis. Chapter 4 accounts for the development and technological heritage of the Zoomar lens. Inventive efforts and methods used by its primary inventor, Frank Back, are discussed. Chapter 5 outlines the means by which Back and his business partners marketed the lens. In Chapter 6, the extent to which the lens was used in the American television industry between 1946 and 1956 is demonstrated. Chapter 7 discusses the American market entry of the Pan Cinor zoom lens, and attempts by Zoomar to use patent law to block it. Chapter 8 discusses the way in which zoom lenses were used in television during the later 1950s and early 1960s, with a particular focus on some of the ‘TV Generation’ directors. Chapter 9 discusses developments in zoom lens technology and in industrial attitudes towards the use of such technology. Chapter 10 discusses the use of the zoom by TV Generation directors in their later feature film work. The final chapter compares discussions of Robert Altman’s use of the zoom in the early 1970s with the problematizing example of contemporaneous television style. Significant findings are summarized, and areas for future investigation suggested. Specifically, the dissertation demonstrates that early postwar American television is a rich untapped area for future investigations of the roots of film technology, and that from 1946 to 1974 zoom lens development was more gradual, incremental and complex than previously suggested. Hall 5 Acknowledgements I am deeply grateful to: my supervisors, Prof. Steve Neale and Dr. James Lyons, who encouraged me to pursue the topic, and offered support, advice, and encouragement while I did so; my fellow students and colleagues in the Department of English at the University of Exeter, and beyond – especially those who asked tricky questions, or shared their favourite zoom shot; the individuals who made time to be interviewed, or shared their expertise: especially Bill Pegler, Chuck Pharis, Norman D. Preston, Robert J. Roth, and William Arbaugh – and to David Gleason for maintaining AmericanRadioHistory.com; the staff of the archives consulted – especially Heather Smedberg and her colleagues in the Mandeville Special Collections Library at UC San Diego, Dorinda Hartmann at the Wisconsin Center for Film and Theater Research, Dr Mark Quigley at the Archive Research and Study Center at UCLA, and the students who keep the Instructional Media Lab there running smoothly; the Arts and Humanities Research Council, for funding the project; my friends and family; and above all Kiri Thompson. Hall 7 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 5 List of Illustrations ........................................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 13 Technological Definitions .......................................................................................... 17 Terminology ............................................................................................................... 20 2. Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 23 ‘Use and Abuse’ ......................................................................................................... 23 General Histories ........................................................................................................ 35 Beyond ‘Use and Abuse’ ............................................................................................ 43 3. Research Methodology ............................................................................................... 51 Social Histories of Technology .................................................................................. 51 Source Selection ......................................................................................................... 62 Aesthetic Criticism ..................................................................................................... 67 4. Inventing the Zoomar Lens......................................................................................... 73 Context for Invention: Zoom Technology To 1940 ................................................... 74 Frank Back and the Zoomar Lens............................................................................... 86 5. Marketing the Zoomar Lens ....................................................................................... 99 Paramount Newsreel ................................................................................................... 99 Network Television: NBC and the Zoomar Lens ..................................................... 106 Local Stations and Other Networks .......................................................................... 119 Sports, News, and Light Entertainment .................................................................... 126 6. From Puppets to Presidents: Case Studies ................................................................ 136 Kukla, Fran, and Ollie .............................................................................................. 136 Political Conventions ................................................................................................ 146 Beyond Television .................................................................................................... 158 Figures: Chapter 6 .................................................................................................... 163 7. Competition: Paillard and the Pan Cinor .................................................................. 167 Pan Cinor and Zoomar 16 ......................................................................................... 171 Hall 8 Zoomar vs. Paillard .................................................................................................. 178 8. Filmed Television and the Zoom Shot ..................................................................... 187 Night Court ............................................................................................................... 190 TV Generation I: The Zoom in Television Drama ................................................... 197 Figures: Chapter 8 .................................................................................................... 217 9. Feature Films Before the ‘Zoom Boom’: 1957 to 1969 ........................................... 223 Technological Developments ................................................................................... 224 Stylistic Developments ............................................................................................. 233 Figures: Chapter 9 .................................................................................................... 251 10. TV Generation II: The Zoom in Feature Drama..................................................... 261 Robert Mulligan and John Frankenheimer ............................................................... 262 Sydney Pollack ......................................................................................................... 268 Robert Altman .......................................................................................................... 278 Figures: Chapter 10 .................................................................................................. 289 11. Future Directions: The 1970s and Beyond ............................................................. 297 “Jazz Improvisations” or Television Style?.............................................................. 298 The Social Construction of the Zoom Lens .............................................................. 320 Mapping Future Enquiries ........................................................................................ 327 Figures: Chapter 11 .................................................................................................. 335 Appendices ................................................................................................................... 339 Appendix 1 ............................................................................................................... 341 Bibliography ................................................................................................................. 343 .
Recommended publications
  • Barbara Hershey
    BARBARA HERSHEY Films: Insidious: The Last Key Lorraine Lambert Adam Robitel Blumhouse Productions The 9th life of Louis Drax Violet Drax Alexandre Aja Brightlight Pictures Sister Susan Presser David Lascher Showtime Networks Answers to Nothing Marilyn Matthew Leutwyler Ambush Entertainment Insidious Lorraine Lambert James Wan Film District Black Swan* Erica Darren Aronofsky Fox Searchlight Answers To Nothing Marilyn Matthew Leutwyler Independent Albert Schweitzer Helen Schweitzer Two Ocenans Production Gavin Millar Uncross The Stars Hilda Ken Goldie Independent The Bird Can’t Fly Melody Threes Anna Independent Childless Natalie Charlie Levi Independent Love Comes Lately Rosalie Jan Schutte Independent Riding The Bullet Jean Parker Mick Garris M P C A 11:14 Norma Greg Marcks Independent Lantana Dr Valerie Somers Ray Lawrence Independent Passion Rose Grainger Peter Duncan Independent A Soldier's Daughter Never Cries Marcella Willis James Ivory October Films Frogs For Snakes Eva Santana Amos Poe Shooting Gallery The Portrait Of A Lady** Madame Serena Merle Jane Campion Polygram Films The Pallbearer Ruth Abernathy Matthew Reeves Miramax Last Of The Dogmen Prof. Lilian Sloan Tab Murphy Savoy A Dangerous Woman Frances Beecham Rowland V. Lee Universal Pictures Swing Kids Frau Muller Thomas Carter Buena Vista Falling Down Elizabeth Travino Joel Schumacher Warner Bros Splitting Heirs Duchess Lucinda Robert Young Universal Public Eye Kay Levitz Howard Franklin Universal Defenseless Thelma ' T.k.' Martin Campbell New Line Tune In Tomorrow Aunt Julia Jon Amiel Cinecom Paris Trout *** Hanna Trout Stephen Gyllenhaal Showtime Last Temptation Of Christ**** Mary Magdalene Martin Scorsese Universal Beaches Hillary Whitney Essex Gary Marshall Walt Disney Prd. A World Apart Diana Roth Chris Menges Working Title Ltd Hoosiers Myra Fleener David Anspaugh Hemdale Film Corp Hannah And Her Sisters***** Lee Woody Allen Orion Pictures Corp Tin Men Nora Tilley Barry Levinson Walt Disney Prd Shy People****** Ruth A.
    [Show full text]
  • University International
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of America DEMOCRACY on FILM Thursday & Friday, May 16 & 17, 2019 8:30 A.M
    The Film Foundation’s Story of Movies Presents With support from AFSCME In association with AFI Silver Theatre and Cultural Center A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP ON FILM AND VISUAL LITERACY FOR CLASSROOM EDUCATORS ACROSS ALL DISCIPLINES, GRADES 6 – 12 Portraits of America DEMOCRACY ON FILM Thursday & Friday, May 16 & 17, 2019 8:30 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. AFI Silver Theatre and Cultural Center 8633 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910 WHO & WHAT This FREE two-day seminar introduces educators to an interdisciplinary curriculum that challenges students to think contextually about the role of film as an expression of American democracy. SCREENING AND DISCUSSION ACTIVITIES FOCUS ON STRATEGIES TO: N Increase civic engagement by developing students’ critical viewing and thinking skills. N Give students the tools to understand the persuasive and universal language of moving images, a significant component ofvisual literacy. N Explore the social issues and diverse points of view represented in films produced in different historical periods. MORNING AND AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS FOCUS ON LEARNING HOW TO READ A FILM, PRINCIPLES OF CINEMA LITERACY, AND INTERPRETING FILM IN HISTORICAL/CULTURAL CONTEXTS. N Handout materials include screening activities and primary source documents to support and enhance students’ critical thinking skills. N Afternoon screenings showcase award-winning films, deemed historically and culturally significant by the Library of Congress National Film Registry. N Lunch is provided for registered participants. N Classroom capacity is limited, so early registration is encouraged. REGISTRATION NRegister with the AFI Silver Theater here: https://silver.afi.com/Ticketing/visShop.aspx NMore information available at storyofmovies.org/professional-development WHY TEACH FILM IN THE CLASSROOM? • A rich tapestry of literature, art and social history exists to enhance film study, making it an ideal subject for interdisciplinary learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarantine Pub Quiz - Bookworm Edition Mitchell Crouse
    Quarantine Pub Quiz - Bookworm Edition Mitchell Crouse Closed Captions What are the oft-omitted sub-titles of the following texts? 1. Moby Dick 2. Twelfth Night 3. Frankenstein 4. A Christmas Carol 5. Slaughterhouse Five 6. Pamela 7. Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas 8. Black Beauty 9. The Hobbit 10. The Palm-Wine Drinkard Small Type Big Screen Name the author of the original work and the director of their big-screen adaptation. 1. A Clockwork Orange 2. The Fellowship of the Ring 3. Sense and Sensibility 4. Trainspotting 5. To Kill A Mockingbird 6. Gone Girl 7. Inherent Vice 8. Little Women 9. The Wizard of Oz 10. The Princess Bride 11. No Country for Old Men 12. Metropolis 13. Breakfast at Tiffany’s 14. 12 Years a Slave 15. Strangers on a Train Oooh, shiny! Bits and bobs of literary prize trivia. 1. Name one of the four authors to win the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction twice. 2. Name one of only three black authors to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. 3. The Booker Prize is named after Booker, McConnell Ltd, a company famous for what? 4. The World Fantasy Award changed their trophy to a tree and moon after outcry about the racism of which famous author whose bust previously adorned the award? 5. Where do the annually awarded science fiction and fantasy Hugo Awards get their name from? You Don’t Say? Minutiae and oddities of the literary world. 1. Who is the most adapted novelist in film and television history? 2. Douglas Adams does not refer to his five-book Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy ​ collection as a series or a pentalogy.
    [Show full text]
  • Film and Politics Winter 2018
    Political Science 410 Film and Politics Winter 2018 Professor Richard Davis 754 SWKT x2-7503 [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays 9-10: 45 am or by appointment Course Description This course explores the use of a mass medium - film - as a vehicle for communicating messages about political institutions and processes and the elites (primarily politicians) who are associated with them. Film is a new medium in the history of the world. One hundred years ago, film was a newly created vehicle for communicating with the mass audience. Today, mass market films reach hundreds of millions of people worldwide. This class is designed to analyze how directors use film to affect or reinforce political views or how they intentionally or unconsciously reflect certain ideas about politics in their films. We will address film’s portrayal of politicians, political institutions, political organizations, and political processes. The films we will survey primarily are feature films designed for a mass market. All have been released for theatre viewing. The questions we will answer over the semester center on the political motives of the film's director and then the ways these motives are transmitted through plot line, dialogue, music, visual images, camera angles, and various other cinematic techniques. Some questions we will continually ask throughout the semester include: What are the unstated assumptions of the film? What is the purpose of the film? From whose perspective is the story told? What other perspectives are not shown? Who is the hero (heroes) of the film? What political points does the director make? What is the historical and political context shaping the film? To what extent did the film affect the larger political environment? Course Objectives Students will be able to discern the existence of political messages of film, both intentional and unintentional.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th Anniversary
    TH ANNIVERSARY 20 EDITION LOS ANGELES 7920 Sunset Boulevard, 6th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90046 / 323-436-5060 NEW YORK 110 West 57th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10019 / 212-258-0860 FILMMAKERS FOR FILM PRESERVATION RICHARD III (1955, d. Laurence Olivier) Image courtesy of Janus Films and The Criterion Collection. Film is living, vital evidence of our existence; our thoughts, our dreams, our emotions. That’s the way FILMMAKERS FOR FILM PRESERVATION we should think about cinema. > MARTIN SCORSESE oundation. During that time, I’m proud It’s now been over 20 years since we began The Film F to say that we’ve helped identify, fund and manage the restoration and preservation of over 555 films. Under the watchful and attentive eye of our board of directors and in collaboration CHAIR IN MEMORIAM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ARTISTS RIGHTS ADVISORY COUNCIL with numerous major film archives, pictures of all kinds—features, silents, documentaries, Martin Scorsese Robert Altman Margaret Bodde Elliot Silverstein, Chair Stanley Kubrick Tom Cruise independent, avant-garde—have been protected and preserved for generations to come. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sydney Pollack MANAGING DIRECTOR Harrison Ford I think you’ll all agree that this is a record in which we can take real and lasting pride. Woody Allen Jennifer Ahn Miloš Forman Paul Thomas Anderson PRESIDENT e felt that it was important to start with young ARCHIVISTS ADVISORY COUNCIL Taylor Hackford e have also developed a unique curriculum, The Story of Movies, which is distributed free Wes Anderson Taylor Hackford Dustin Hoffman W Francis Ford Coppola Robert Rosen, Chair SECRETARY-TREASURER Academy Film Archive Anjelica Huston of charge and is constantly expanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Movies in Every Genre
    Best Movies in Every Genre WTOP Film Critic Jason Fraley Action 25. The Fast and the Furious (2001) - Rob Cohen 24. Drive (2011) - Nichols Winding Refn 23. Predator (1987) - John McTiernan 22. First Blood (1982) - Ted Kotcheff 21. Armageddon (1998) - Michael Bay 20. The Avengers (2012) - Joss Whedon 19. Spider-Man (2002) – Sam Raimi 18. Batman (1989) - Tim Burton 17. Enter the Dragon (1973) - Robert Clouse 16. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) – Ang Lee 15. Inception (2010) - Christopher Nolan 14. Lethal Weapon (1987) – Richard Donner 13. Yojimbo (1961) - Akira Kurosawa 12. Superman (1978) - Richard Donner 11. Wonder Woman (2017) - Patty Jenkins 10. Black Panther (2018) - Ryan Coogler 9. Mad Max (1979-2014) - George Miller 8. Top Gun (1986) - Tony Scott 7. Mission: Impossible (1996) - Brian DePalma 6. The Bourne Trilogy (2002-2007) - Paul Greengrass 5. Goldfinger (1964) - Guy Hamilton 4. The Terminator (1984-1991) - James Cameron 3. The Dark Knight (2008) - Christopher Nolan 2. The Matrix (1999) - The Wachowskis 1. Die Hard (1988) - John McTiernan Adventure 25. The Goonies (1985) - Richard Donner 24. Gunga Din (1939) - George Stevens 23. Road to Morocco (1942) - David Butler 22. The Poseidon Adventure (1972) - Ronald Neame 21. Fitzcarraldo (1982) - Werner Herzog 20. Cast Away (2000) - Robert Zemeckis 19. Life of Pi (2012) - Ang Lee 18. The Revenant (2015) - Alejandro G. Inarritu 17. Aguirre, Wrath of God (1972) - Werner Herzog 16. Mutiny on the Bounty (1935) - Frank Lloyd 15. Pirates of the Caribbean (2003) - Gore Verbinski 14. The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) - Michael Curtiz 13. The African Queen (1951) - John Huston 12. To Have and Have Not (1944) - Howard Hawks 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Gael García Bernal | 3
    A film festival for everyone! FESTIVAL 12/20 OCTOBER 2019 – LYON, FRANCE Francis Ford Coppola Lumière Award 2019 © Christian Simonpietri / Getty Images th GUESTS OF HONOR Frances McDormand anniversary10 Daniel Auteuil Bong Joon-ho Donald Sutherland Marco Bellocchio Marina Vlady Gael García Bernal | 3 10th anniversary! 2019. A decade ago, the Lumière festival presented the first Lumière Award to Clint Eastwood in Lyon, the birthplace of the Lumière Cinematograph. As the festival continues to flourish (185,000 moviegoers attended last year), we look forward to commemorating the last ten years. Today, passion for classic cinema is stronger than ever and Lyon never ceases to celebrate the memory of films, movie theaters and audiences. Lumière 2019 will be rich in events. Guests of honor will descend on Lyon from all over the world; Frances McDormand, Daniel Auteuil, Bong Joon-ho, Donald Sutherland, Marco Bellocchio, Marina Vlady and Gael Garcia Bernal will evoke their cinema and their love of films. Retrospectives, tributes, film-concerts, exhibitions, master classes, cinema Marlon Brando in Apocalypse Now by Francis Ford Coppola all-nighters, screenings for families and children, a DVD market, a cinema bookstore, the Cinema Fair... a myriad of opportunities to enjoy and cherish heritage works together. THE PROGRAM For this 10th anniversary, the Lumière festival has created Lumière Classics, a section that presents the finest restored films of the year, put forward by archives, RETROSPECTIVES producers, rights holders, distributors, studios and film libraries. The new label focuses on supporting selected French and international films. Francis Ford Coppola: Lumière Award 2019 of crazy freedom. The films broach sex, miscegenation, homosexuality; they feature gangsters and femme A filmmaker of rare genius, fulfilling an extraordinary fatales, embodied by Mae West, Joan Crawford and Also new, the International Classic Film Market Village will hold a DVD Publishers’ destiny, auteur of some of the greatest successes and th Barbara Stanwyck… Directors like William A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hgels and America's Pastime Isn't Going out to the Ballpark, It's Watching the Game on Televi- Apocalypse: the Cinema Sound Advice Sion
    Play Ball! hgels and America's pastime isn't going out to the ballpark, it's watching the game on televi- Apocalypse: The Cinema Sound Advice sion . In addition to the pleasures of the of Derek Jarman A seminar in cooperation with the sport, baseball broadcasts offer the New Democracy in visual pleasure. and iuxuriat- York University School of Con- medium at its best, capturing the excite- Celebrating tinuing Education. ing in an excess of theatricality and ment of live TV, and showcasing the most Communication: Popular Held NYU's Washington Square painterly effect, Derek Jarman has taken at advanced aud(ovisual techniques. The art Campus Video and Film in his place as one of the most exciting con- of televised baseball will be explored in a Saturday, March 7, 10 a.m.-5 panel discussion with some of the leading Latin America temporary British filmmakers. While his -SEBASTIANE, JUBILEE, Fee: $80 figures in network sports. An evening of feature films To : Make THE TEMPEST THE ANGELIC CONVER- register checks payable to the video screenings offer rare behind-the- Freelance journalist Karen Ranucci spent American Museum the Moving . SATION now CARAVAGGIO-have of Image The Lubitsch Vouch scenes glimpses of majorleague teams. In a year travelling through Latin America. and Enclose address, day received international acclaim, his con. name, telephone contrast. the feature films derive their The result is this timely and revealing col- and occupation and mail AMMI, film and tinued experimentation with super-8 and to 34-12 -Iri the mid-1920s director Ernst Lubitsch drama and comedy from life off the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Hartford-Davis and British Exploitation Cinema of the 1960S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository Corrupted, Tormented and Damned: Reframing British Exploitation Cinema and The films of Robert Hartford-Davis This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Michael Ahmed, M.A., B.A. PhD University of East Anglia Faculty of Film and Television Studies January 2013 Abstract The American exploitation film functioned as an alternative to mainstream Hollywood cinema, and served as a way of introducing to audiences shocking, controversial themes, as well as narratives that major American studios were reluctant to explore. Whereas American exploitation cinema developed in parallel to mainstream Hollywood, exploitation cinema in Britain has no such historical equivalent. Furthermore, the definition of exploitation, in terms of the British industry, is currently used to describe (according to the Encyclopedia of British Film) either poor quality sex comedies from the 1970s, a handful of horror films, or as a loosely fixed generic description dependent upon prevailing critical or academic orthodoxies. However, exploitation was a term used by the British industry in the 1960s to describe a wide-ranging and eclectic variety of films – these films included, ―kitchen-sink dramas‖, comedies, musicals, westerns, as well as many films from Continental Europe and Scandinavia. Therefore, the current description of an exploitation film in Britain has changed a great deal from its original meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Filmographie
    Filmographie 2001: A Space Odyssey (GB/US 1968). Regie: Stanley Kubrick. Prod.: Stanley Kubrick Productions und Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. DVD, Turner Entertainment Co. und Warner Home Video 2001. 143 Min. À bout de souffle (FR 1960). Regie: Jean-Luc Godard. Prod.: Les Films Impéria, Les Productions Georges de Beauregard und Société Nouvelle de Cinématogra- phie. DVD, Kinowelt Home Entertainment 2008. 86 Min. Adaptation. (US 2002). Regie: Spike Jonze. Prod.: Magnet Productions et al. DVD, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment 2009. 110 Min. Ansiktet (SE 1958). Regie: Ingmar Bergman. Prod.: Svensk Filmindustri. DVD, Tar- tan Video 2001. 97 Min. Artificial Intelligence: AI (US 2001). Regie: Steven Spielberg. Prod.: Warner Bros. et al. DVD, Warner Home Video 2002. 145 Min. Arrival (US 2016). Regie: Denis Villeneuve. Prod.: Lava Bear Films et al. Blu-ray, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment 2017. 116 Min. Badlands (US 1973). Regie: Terrence Malick. Prod.: Warner Bros. et al. DVD, Süd- deutsche Zeitung 2005. 90 Min. Barton Fink (US/GB 1991). Regie: Joel Coen. Prod.: Working Title Films et al. DVD, Universal Pictures 2004. 114 Min. Being John Malkovich (US 1999). Regie: Spike Jonze. Prod.: Propaganda Films et al. DVD, Universal Studios 2003. 108 Min. Belle de jour (FR/IT 1967). Regie: Luis Buñuel. Prod.: Robert et Raymond Hakim, Paris Film Production und Five Film Rome. Blu-ray, Studiocanal 2014. 100 Min. The Big Lebowski (US/GB 1998). Regie: Joel Coen. Prod.: Working Title Films et al. DVD, Universal Pictures 2006. 112 Min. Boxes (FR 2007). Regie: Jane Birkin. Prod.: Les Films de la Croisade, La Région Bretagne und Centre National de la Cinématographie.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Herunterladen
    kapitel 11 Film‑, Editions‑ und Zugriffsverzeichnis 11.1 Besprochene Filme und Editionen ausergewöhnliche Reise, Die (Serge Bromberg/Eric Lange 2011. Filmhistorische Dokumentation). In: Georges Méliès. Die Magie des Kinos (DVD. Doppel- DVD: Arthaus 2012). Beyond the Rocks (Sam Wood 1922. DVD: Nederlands Filmmuseum/Milestone Film & Video 2006). Blackmail (Alfred Hitchcock 1929. DVD. Stumm- und Tonfilmfassung: Arthaus 2010). Blade Runner (Ridley Scott 1982. DVD. Five Disc Ultimate Collector’s Edition. Inkl. der Versionen: Work Print/Sneak Peak-Version/Theatrical US-Version/Theatrical International/Broadcast [1986]/Director’s Cut [1992]/Final Cut 2007]: Warner Bros. 2007). Boot, Das (Wolfgang Petersen 1981. Blu-Ray-Disc. Kinofassung [1981]/Director’s Cut [1997]: Jubiläumsedition. Steel-Book: EuroVideo 2011). Boot, Das (Wolfgang Petersen 1985. TV-Serie. DVD: Euro Video 2004). Boot, Das (Wolfgang Petersen 1985. TV-Serie. VoD: Netflix/Schweiz 2017. Letzter Abruf 16.07.2017). Carmen (Cecil De Mille 1915. DVD. Als Bonusmaterial). In: Charlie Chaplins Carmen Parodie (Charlie Chaplin 1916. DVD: Great Movies 2012). Charlie Chaplins Carmen Parodie (Charlie Chaplin 1916. DVD: Great Movies 2012). Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg 1977. Blu-Ray-Disc. 30th Anniversary Ultimate Edition: Sony 2007). Clue (Jonathan Lynn 1985. DVD: Warner Bros./Paramount 2008). Crazy Cinématographe. Europäisches Jahrmarktkino 1896–1916 (DVD: Edition Filmmuseum Nr. 18. 4. Aufl. 2012 [2007]). Drei Haselnüsse für Aschenbrödel (Václav Vorlíček 1973. DVD/Blu-Ray-Disc: Icestorm 2010/2011). Dressed to Kill (Brian De Palma 1980. Blu-Ray-Disc. Special Edition: Criterion 2015). Dressed to Kill (Brian De Palma 1980. DVD. Special Edition: MGM Home Enter- tainment 2001). Ein Mythos in Agfa-Color (Gerd Koshofer/Nina Koshofer 2005.
    [Show full text]