Auteur Theory.Key

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Auteur Theory.Key The Auteur Theory The Hollywood Model The Studio System Big Five: • Fox • Paramount • Warner Brothers • RKO • MGM America comes out on top • American and European cinema equally influential until World War II • American films not seen in Europe for the duration of the war • German Occupation prohibited import of American films to France • When ban was lifted, influx of four years worth of movies in 1945 - more than 2000 films to distribute (Compare with 603 American films released in 2007...) American Directors Who Inspired the Auteur Theory Formally ranked as “B” directors • Howard Hawks - Bringing Up Baby • Alfred Hitchcock - Notorious • Fritz Lang - The Big Heat • Nicholas Ray - Rebel Without A Cause • Orson Welles - Citizen Kane • John Ford - The Searchers Alexandre Astruc "The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: The Camera-Stylo” 1948 • Moviemaking was an industrial process... • The director should use the commercial apparatus the way a writer uses a pen (camera-stylo) and, through the mise en scène, imprint their vision on the work. • Challenge the traditional storytelling structure. • Writer becomes less important. Andre Bazin • Films should reflect a director's personal vision • Beginning of auteur theory provided a way to organize film criticism and to rebel against the French filmmaking establishment - “Papa’s cinema” • Founded Cahiers du Cinema 1951 “The Tradition of Quality emphasized craft over innovation, privileged established directors over new directors, and preferred the great works of the past to experimentation. Literary adaptation provided fertile ground for this decade, on the part of those who were anxious to prove the cultural superiority of French film in the face of a massive influx of Hollywood movies into the French market.” “A Certain Tendency of the French Cinema” Francois Truffaut "Une Certaine tendance du cinéma française" (1954) • The French weekly news magazine L'Express called Truffaut ... "a hateful enfant terrible who puts his foot in his mouth with unbearable self-conceit" The 400 Blows 1959 • The Nouvelle Vague - (New Wave) - was born Francois Truffaut - 400 Blows Jean-Luc Godard - Breathless Claude Chabrol - Le Beau Serge Jacques Rivette - Céline and Julie Go Boating Alain Renais - Last Year at Marienbad Eric Roehmer - Claire’s Knee A story should have a beginning, a middle, and an end . but not necessarily in that order. Jean-Luc Godard Tenets of New Wave style • Jump cuts: a non-naturalistic edit, usually a section of a continuous shot that is removed unexpectedly, illogically • Shooting on location • Natural lighting • Improvised dialogue and plotting • Direct sound recording • Long takes Andrew Sarris • The American Cinema: Directors and Directions 1929-1968 • Popularized the Auteur Theory in America The Sarris Pantheon 1. Robert Flaherty 8. Ernst Lubitsch 2. John Ford 9. F. W. Murnau 3. D. W. Griffith 10. Max Ophuls 4. Howard Hawks 11. Josef von Sternberg 5. Buster Keaton 12. Charles Chaplin 6. Orson Welles 13. Alfred Hitchcock 7. Fritz Lang 14. Jean Renoir Premises of Auteur Theory • Technical competence of • “The third and ultimate director as a criterion of premise of the auteur theory value is concerned with interior meaning, the ultimate glory • Distinguishable personality of of the cinema as an art. the director as a criterion of Interior meaning is value extrapolated from the tension between a director’s personality and his material”. Pauline Kael “Circles and Squares” • Many good films made by technically inept directors. • “The smell of a skunk is more distinguishable than the perfume of a rose; does that make it better?” • Artist expresses himself in the unity of form and content, not the tension. American New Wave • 1950s - Death of studio system due to television • 1960s-70s - Coppola, Scorsese, Spielberg, Altman, Lucas Pros of perpetuating of the auteur theory • Easy to market films - branding • A way to organize criticism of films • Includes commercial films Cons of perpetuating the auteur theory • Cult of personality - Too much director power • Misses opportunity to appreciate the most collaborative of the arts • Excludes analysis of the influences of the collaborators on the final film • Elevates bad films and ignores good ones if they don’t fit that director’s paradigm Things to Think About... • “Interior meaning is extrapolated from the tension between a director’s personality and his material”. Tension is actually between director, circumstance, crew, producer... • New idea of authorship in general - recent availability of technology means true auteurism http://www.youtube.com/blog?entry=4KWKYZN7znU A gathering in Los Angeles, 1972: (from left to right standing) Robert Mulligan, William Wyler, George Cukor, Robert Wise, Jean-Claude Carrière, Serge Silberman; (seated) Billy Wilder, George Stevens, Buñuel, Alfred Hitchcock, Rouben Mamoulian. “Making of” videos have demystified filmmaking process Judge the Art, not the Artist “Tremors” Ron Underwood “Nightmare on Elm Street” Wes Craven Coppola’s Process Who has more power - the director or the producer? Producer’s role is redefined each time by the nature of the… • Project - indie, studio project, sequel… • Director’s style and personality • Cast - big stars • Funding - Independent financiers, bond company • Relationship with director and cast • Thankless job • “The buck stops here” for problems Works Cited • Balio, Tino. The American Film Industry. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1976. • Braddock, Jeremy, Stephen Hock, and Andrew Sarris. Directed by Allen Smithee. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001. • Gerstner, David A., and Janet Staiger. Authorship and Film : Trafficking with Hollywood. New York: Routledge, 2003. • Kael, Pauline. "Circles and Squares." Film Quarterly 16.3 (1963): 12-26. <http:// www.jstor.org/stable/1210726>. • Macklin, F. Anthony, and Nick Pici. Voices from the Set : The Film Heritage Interviews. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press, 2000. • Marie, Michel, and Richard John Neupert. The French New Wave : An Artistic School. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2003. • Monaco, James. The New Wave : Truffaut, Godard, Chabrol, Rohmer, Rivette. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976. • Prince, Stephen. Movies and Meaning : An Introduction to Film. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1997. • Sarris, Andrew. The American Cinema : Directors and Directions, 1929-1968. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co, 1968. • Schatz, Thomas. The Genius of the System : Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era. 1st ed. New York: Pantheon, 1988. • Trumpbour, John. Selling Hollywood to the World : U.S. and European Struggles for Mastery of the Global Film Industry, 1920-1950. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002. • Vest, James M. "The Making of Downhill and its Impact on Hitchcock's Reputation." , 2005. 50-94. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=fah&AN=23598608&site=ehost-live>. • WILLIAM GRIMES. "The Auteur Theory of Film: Holy Or just Full of Holes?" New York Times (1993): 9. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=aph&AN=30202345&site=ehost-live>. .
Recommended publications
  • Barbara Hershey
    BARBARA HERSHEY Films: Insidious: The Last Key Lorraine Lambert Adam Robitel Blumhouse Productions The 9th life of Louis Drax Violet Drax Alexandre Aja Brightlight Pictures Sister Susan Presser David Lascher Showtime Networks Answers to Nothing Marilyn Matthew Leutwyler Ambush Entertainment Insidious Lorraine Lambert James Wan Film District Black Swan* Erica Darren Aronofsky Fox Searchlight Answers To Nothing Marilyn Matthew Leutwyler Independent Albert Schweitzer Helen Schweitzer Two Ocenans Production Gavin Millar Uncross The Stars Hilda Ken Goldie Independent The Bird Can’t Fly Melody Threes Anna Independent Childless Natalie Charlie Levi Independent Love Comes Lately Rosalie Jan Schutte Independent Riding The Bullet Jean Parker Mick Garris M P C A 11:14 Norma Greg Marcks Independent Lantana Dr Valerie Somers Ray Lawrence Independent Passion Rose Grainger Peter Duncan Independent A Soldier's Daughter Never Cries Marcella Willis James Ivory October Films Frogs For Snakes Eva Santana Amos Poe Shooting Gallery The Portrait Of A Lady** Madame Serena Merle Jane Campion Polygram Films The Pallbearer Ruth Abernathy Matthew Reeves Miramax Last Of The Dogmen Prof. Lilian Sloan Tab Murphy Savoy A Dangerous Woman Frances Beecham Rowland V. Lee Universal Pictures Swing Kids Frau Muller Thomas Carter Buena Vista Falling Down Elizabeth Travino Joel Schumacher Warner Bros Splitting Heirs Duchess Lucinda Robert Young Universal Public Eye Kay Levitz Howard Franklin Universal Defenseless Thelma ' T.k.' Martin Campbell New Line Tune In Tomorrow Aunt Julia Jon Amiel Cinecom Paris Trout *** Hanna Trout Stephen Gyllenhaal Showtime Last Temptation Of Christ**** Mary Magdalene Martin Scorsese Universal Beaches Hillary Whitney Essex Gary Marshall Walt Disney Prd. A World Apart Diana Roth Chris Menges Working Title Ltd Hoosiers Myra Fleener David Anspaugh Hemdale Film Corp Hannah And Her Sisters***** Lee Woody Allen Orion Pictures Corp Tin Men Nora Tilley Barry Levinson Walt Disney Prd Shy People****** Ruth A.
    [Show full text]
  • University International
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mode of Production and Distribution
    Chapter Three A Mode of Production and Distribution An Economic Concept: “The Small Budget Film,” Was it Myth or Reality? t has often been assumed that the New Wave provoked a sudden Ibreak in the production practices of French cinema, by favoring small budget films. In an industry characterized by an inflationary spiral of ever-increasing production costs, this phenomenon is sufficiently original to warrant investigation. Did most of the films considered to be part of this movement correspond to this notion of a small budget? We would first have to ask: what, in 1959, was a “small budget” movie? The average cost of a film increased from roughly $218,000 in 1955 to $300,000 in 1959. That year, at the moment of the emergence of the New Wave, 133 French films were produced; of these, 33 cost more than $400,000 and 74 cost more than $200,000. That leaves 26 films with a budget of less than $200,000, or “low budget productions;” however, that can hardly be used as an adequate criterion for movies to qualify as “New Wave.”1 Even so, this budgetary trait has often been employed to establish a genealogy for the movement. It involves, primarily, “marginal” films produced outside the dominant commercial system. Two Small Budget Films, “Outside the System” From the point of view of their mode of production, two titles are often imposed as reference points: Jean-Pierre Melville’s self-produced Silence of 49 A Mode of Production and Distribution the Sea, 1947, and Agnes Varda’s La Pointe courte (Short Point), made seven years later, in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • François Truffaut's Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-Viewed
    FILMHISTORIA Online Vol. 29, núms. 1-2 (2019) · ISSN: 2014-668X François Truffaut’s Jules and Jim and the French New Wave, Re-viewed ROBERT J. CARDULLO University of Michigan Abstract Truffaut’s early protagonists, like many of those produced by the New Wave, were rebels or misfits who felt stifled by conventional social definitions. His early cinematic style was as anxious to rip chords as his characters were. Unlike Godard, Truffaut went on in his career to commit himself, not to continued experiment in film form or radical critique of visual imagery, but to formal themes like art and life, film and fiction, and art and education. This article reconsiders a film that embodies such themes, in addition to featuring characters who feel stifled by conventional social definitions: Jules and Jim. Keywords: François Truffaut; French film; New Wave; Jules and Jim; Henri- Pierre Roché Resumen Los primeros protagonistas de Truffaut, como muchos de los producidos por la New Wave, eran rebeldes o inadaptados que se sentían agobiados por las convenciones sociales convencionales. Su estilo cinematográfico temprano estaba tan ansioso por romper moldes como sus personajes. A diferencia de Godard, Truffaut continuó en su carrera comprometiéndose, no a seguir experimentando en forma de película o crítica radical de las imágenes visuales, sino a temas formales como el arte y la vida, el cine y la ficción, y el arte y la educación. Este artículo reconsidera una película que encarna dichos temas, además de presentar personajes que se sienten ahogados: Jules y Jim. Palabras clave: François Truffaut, cine francés, New Wave; Jules and Jim, Henri-Pierre Roché.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the French New Wave (Revisited)
    The French New Wave (revisited) It doesn’t matter where you take things from, but where you take them to. Jean-Luc Godard Dr. Nicos Terzis, Adjunct Professor, Department of Graphic Design, School of Fine Arts, Technological Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece Abstract: The proposed paper will attempt to delineate the history and the aesthetic characteristics of the French Nouvelle Vague, the most famous cinematic movement in history. The structure of the paper will mainly evolve around the following questions and topics: where did the name of the cinematic movement ―Nouvelle Vague‖ originate from? What kind of influences ―Nouvelle Vague‖ exerted on other film movements around the world? Which role did the Cinemathèque Française and Henri Langlois, its creator, play in the formation of the aforementioned cinematic movement? What role did the French film magazines of that period (e.g. Cahiers du Cinéma) play in the creation of this new wave? Who are the main representatives of the movement (Jean-Luc Godard, François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette) and the Left Bank directors: Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Agnes Varda? Who are the Precursors of the Nouvelle Vague? What are the modernist aesthetic characteristics of this world’s most famous cinematic movement, in terms of form [mise en scene] & narrative structure [montage]? Phenomenology and diffused existentialism in the movements’ themes and characters. Keywords: Nouvelle Vague, Modernism, Montage, Auteur theory, Camera Stylo 1 Prologue ―Αgainst modern
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits of America DEMOCRACY on FILM Thursday & Friday, May 16 & 17, 2019 8:30 A.M
    The Film Foundation’s Story of Movies Presents With support from AFSCME In association with AFI Silver Theatre and Cultural Center A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP ON FILM AND VISUAL LITERACY FOR CLASSROOM EDUCATORS ACROSS ALL DISCIPLINES, GRADES 6 – 12 Portraits of America DEMOCRACY ON FILM Thursday & Friday, May 16 & 17, 2019 8:30 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. AFI Silver Theatre and Cultural Center 8633 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910 WHO & WHAT This FREE two-day seminar introduces educators to an interdisciplinary curriculum that challenges students to think contextually about the role of film as an expression of American democracy. SCREENING AND DISCUSSION ACTIVITIES FOCUS ON STRATEGIES TO: N Increase civic engagement by developing students’ critical viewing and thinking skills. N Give students the tools to understand the persuasive and universal language of moving images, a significant component ofvisual literacy. N Explore the social issues and diverse points of view represented in films produced in different historical periods. MORNING AND AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS FOCUS ON LEARNING HOW TO READ A FILM, PRINCIPLES OF CINEMA LITERACY, AND INTERPRETING FILM IN HISTORICAL/CULTURAL CONTEXTS. N Handout materials include screening activities and primary source documents to support and enhance students’ critical thinking skills. N Afternoon screenings showcase award-winning films, deemed historically and culturally significant by the Library of Congress National Film Registry. N Lunch is provided for registered participants. N Classroom capacity is limited, so early registration is encouraged. REGISTRATION NRegister with the AFI Silver Theater here: https://silver.afi.com/Ticketing/visShop.aspx NMore information available at storyofmovies.org/professional-development WHY TEACH FILM IN THE CLASSROOM? • A rich tapestry of literature, art and social history exists to enhance film study, making it an ideal subject for interdisciplinary learning.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Pairs of Lebowski
    Vincendeau Prelims 5/2/09 10:18 am Page i The French New Wave Vincendeau Prelims 5/2/09 10:18 am Page ii Vincendeau Prelims 5/2/09 10:18 am Page iii The French New Wave Critical Landmarks Edited by Peter Graham with Ginette Vincendeau A BFI book published by Palgrave Macmillan Vincendeau Prelims 5/2/09 10:18 am Page iv This publication © British Film Institute 2009 First edition published 1968 by Martin Secker & Warburg as a publication of the BFI Education Department Preface, linking material, editorial arrangement and translations of Chapters 2 and 10 © Peter Graham 2008 Introduction and editorial arrangement © Ginette Vincendeau 2008 Individual essays © the authors 2008 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This edition published in 2009 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN on behalf of the BRITISH FILM INSTITUTE 21 Stephen Street, London W1T 1LN www.bfi.org.uk There’s more to discover about film and television through the BFI.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarantine Pub Quiz - Bookworm Edition Mitchell Crouse
    Quarantine Pub Quiz - Bookworm Edition Mitchell Crouse Closed Captions What are the oft-omitted sub-titles of the following texts? 1. Moby Dick 2. Twelfth Night 3. Frankenstein 4. A Christmas Carol 5. Slaughterhouse Five 6. Pamela 7. Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas 8. Black Beauty 9. The Hobbit 10. The Palm-Wine Drinkard Small Type Big Screen Name the author of the original work and the director of their big-screen adaptation. 1. A Clockwork Orange 2. The Fellowship of the Ring 3. Sense and Sensibility 4. Trainspotting 5. To Kill A Mockingbird 6. Gone Girl 7. Inherent Vice 8. Little Women 9. The Wizard of Oz 10. The Princess Bride 11. No Country for Old Men 12. Metropolis 13. Breakfast at Tiffany’s 14. 12 Years a Slave 15. Strangers on a Train Oooh, shiny! Bits and bobs of literary prize trivia. 1. Name one of the four authors to win the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction twice. 2. Name one of only three black authors to win the Nobel Prize in Literature. 3. The Booker Prize is named after Booker, McConnell Ltd, a company famous for what? 4. The World Fantasy Award changed their trophy to a tree and moon after outcry about the racism of which famous author whose bust previously adorned the award? 5. Where do the annually awarded science fiction and fantasy Hugo Awards get their name from? You Don’t Say? Minutiae and oddities of the literary world. 1. Who is the most adapted novelist in film and television history? 2. Douglas Adams does not refer to his five-book Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy ​ collection as a series or a pentalogy.
    [Show full text]
  • GODARD FILM AS THEORY Volker Pantenburg Farocki/Godard
    FILM CULTURE IN TRANSITION FAROCKI/ GODARD FILM AS THEORY volker pantenburg Farocki/Godard Farocki/Godard Film as Theory Volker Pantenburg Amsterdam University Press The translation of this book is made possible by a grant from Volkswagen Foundation. Originally published as: Volker Pantenburg, Film als Theorie. Bildforschung bei Harun Farocki und Jean-Luc Godard, transcript Verlag, 2006 [isbn 3-899420440-9] Translated by Michael Turnbull This publication was supported by the Internationales Kolleg für Kulturtechnikforschung und Medienphilosophie of the Bauhaus-Universität Weimar with funds from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. IKKM BOOKS Volume 25 An overview of the whole series can be found at www.ikkm-weimar.de/schriften Cover illustration (front): Jean-Luc Godard, Histoire(s) du cinéma, Chapter 4B (1988-1998) Cover illustration (back): Interface © Harun Farocki 1995 Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Layout: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 90 8964 891 4 e-isbn 978 90 4852 755 7 doi 10.5117/9789089648914 nur 670 © V. Pantenburg / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2015 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Every effort has been made to obtain permission to use all copyrighted illustrations reproduced in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Film and Politics Winter 2018
    Political Science 410 Film and Politics Winter 2018 Professor Richard Davis 754 SWKT x2-7503 [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays 9-10: 45 am or by appointment Course Description This course explores the use of a mass medium - film - as a vehicle for communicating messages about political institutions and processes and the elites (primarily politicians) who are associated with them. Film is a new medium in the history of the world. One hundred years ago, film was a newly created vehicle for communicating with the mass audience. Today, mass market films reach hundreds of millions of people worldwide. This class is designed to analyze how directors use film to affect or reinforce political views or how they intentionally or unconsciously reflect certain ideas about politics in their films. We will address film’s portrayal of politicians, political institutions, political organizations, and political processes. The films we will survey primarily are feature films designed for a mass market. All have been released for theatre viewing. The questions we will answer over the semester center on the political motives of the film's director and then the ways these motives are transmitted through plot line, dialogue, music, visual images, camera angles, and various other cinematic techniques. Some questions we will continually ask throughout the semester include: What are the unstated assumptions of the film? What is the purpose of the film? From whose perspective is the story told? What other perspectives are not shown? Who is the hero (heroes) of the film? What political points does the director make? What is the historical and political context shaping the film? To what extent did the film affect the larger political environment? Course Objectives Students will be able to discern the existence of political messages of film, both intentional and unintentional.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 Min.)
    February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 min.) DIRECTED BY Jean-Luc Godard WRITING François Truffaut and Claude Chabrol (original scenario), Jean-Luc Godard (screenplay) PRODUCER Georges de Beauregard MUSIC Martial Solal CINEMATOGRAPHY Raoul Coutard FILM EDITING Cécile Decugis CAST Jean Seberg...Patricia Franchini Jean-Paul Belmondo...Michel Poiccard / Laszlo Kovacs Daniel Boulanger...Police Inspector Vital Henri-Jacques Huet...Antonio Berrutti Roger Hanin...Carl Zubart Van Doude...Himself Claude Mansard...Claudius Mansard play of shot-reverse shot' used in many Hollywood productions” Liliane Dreyfus...Liliane / Minouche (as Liliane David) (NewWaveFilm.com). In the article, Godard “praised the use of Michel Fabre...Police Inspector #2 shot-reverse shot as crucial to conveying a character’s mental Jean-Pierre Melville...Parvulesco the Writer point of view and their inner life.” In 1956, after returning to Jean-Luc Godard...The Snitch Paris from Switzerland and making his first two films, Godard Richard Balducci...Tolmatchoff returned to find that Cahiers du cinema, led by Francois Truffaut, André S. Labarthe...Journalist at Orly had become the leading film publication in France. Godard François Moreuil...Journalist at Orly would once again join the fray of French film enthusiasts championing the techniques of Hollywood auteurs like JEAN-LUC GODARD (b. December 3, 1930 in Paris, France) Hitchcock and Hawks, contributing articles “on some of his once said “All great fiction films tend toward documentary, just favorite auteurs such as Otto Preminger and Nicholas Ray” and as all great documentaries tend toward fiction.” Godard began his continuing “his theoretical debate with André Bazin” who film career with a short, which he directed, wrote, edited, acted “continued to commend the long take for its approximation to in, and did cinematography for.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th Anniversary
    TH ANNIVERSARY 20 EDITION LOS ANGELES 7920 Sunset Boulevard, 6th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90046 / 323-436-5060 NEW YORK 110 West 57th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10019 / 212-258-0860 FILMMAKERS FOR FILM PRESERVATION RICHARD III (1955, d. Laurence Olivier) Image courtesy of Janus Films and The Criterion Collection. Film is living, vital evidence of our existence; our thoughts, our dreams, our emotions. That’s the way FILMMAKERS FOR FILM PRESERVATION we should think about cinema. > MARTIN SCORSESE oundation. During that time, I’m proud It’s now been over 20 years since we began The Film F to say that we’ve helped identify, fund and manage the restoration and preservation of over 555 films. Under the watchful and attentive eye of our board of directors and in collaboration CHAIR IN MEMORIAM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ARTISTS RIGHTS ADVISORY COUNCIL with numerous major film archives, pictures of all kinds—features, silents, documentaries, Martin Scorsese Robert Altman Margaret Bodde Elliot Silverstein, Chair Stanley Kubrick Tom Cruise independent, avant-garde—have been protected and preserved for generations to come. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sydney Pollack MANAGING DIRECTOR Harrison Ford I think you’ll all agree that this is a record in which we can take real and lasting pride. Woody Allen Jennifer Ahn Miloš Forman Paul Thomas Anderson PRESIDENT e felt that it was important to start with young ARCHIVISTS ADVISORY COUNCIL Taylor Hackford e have also developed a unique curriculum, The Story of Movies, which is distributed free Wes Anderson Taylor Hackford Dustin Hoffman W Francis Ford Coppola Robert Rosen, Chair SECRETARY-TREASURER Academy Film Archive Anjelica Huston of charge and is constantly expanding.
    [Show full text]