February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 Min.)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 Min.) February 26, 2019 (XXXVIII:5) Jean-Luc Godard: BREATHLESS/À BOUT DE SOUFFLE (1960, 90 min.) DIRECTED BY Jean-Luc Godard WRITING François Truffaut and Claude Chabrol (original scenario), Jean-Luc Godard (screenplay) PRODUCER Georges de Beauregard MUSIC Martial Solal CINEMATOGRAPHY Raoul Coutard FILM EDITING Cécile Decugis CAST Jean Seberg...Patricia Franchini Jean-Paul Belmondo...Michel Poiccard / Laszlo Kovacs Daniel Boulanger...Police Inspector Vital Henri-Jacques Huet...Antonio Berrutti Roger Hanin...Carl Zubart Van Doude...Himself Claude Mansard...Claudius Mansard play of shot-reverse shot' used in many Hollywood productions” Liliane Dreyfus...Liliane / Minouche (as Liliane David) (NewWaveFilm.com). In the article, Godard “praised the use of Michel Fabre...Police Inspector #2 shot-reverse shot as crucial to conveying a character’s mental Jean-Pierre Melville...Parvulesco the Writer point of view and their inner life.” In 1956, after returning to Jean-Luc Godard...The Snitch Paris from Switzerland and making his first two films, Godard Richard Balducci...Tolmatchoff returned to find that Cahiers du cinema, led by Francois Truffaut, André S. Labarthe...Journalist at Orly had become the leading film publication in France. Godard François Moreuil...Journalist at Orly would once again join the fray of French film enthusiasts championing the techniques of Hollywood auteurs like JEAN-LUC GODARD (b. December 3, 1930 in Paris, France) Hitchcock and Hawks, contributing articles “on some of his once said “All great fiction films tend toward documentary, just favorite auteurs such as Otto Preminger and Nicholas Ray” and as all great documentaries tend toward fiction.” Godard began his continuing “his theoretical debate with André Bazin” who film career with a short, which he directed, wrote, edited, acted “continued to commend the long take for its approximation to in, and did cinematography for. The 1955 film was entitled A physical reality.” Contra Bazin, “Godard praised editing for Flirtatious Woman‡‡, an adaptation of the Guy de Maupassant rendering the subjective essence of reality,” maintaining that a story "Le Signe" (“The Signal”), was shot on 16mm in Geneva, “well-edited film. .was more truthful to life than the using money Godard earned from selling the documentary uninterrupted scene – rather than portraying a close Operation Concrete (1958) that he had directed, written, and representation of reality, it seemed to provide the experience of edited on the job as a construction worker in Switzerland. In reality itself” (NewWaveFilm.com). Throughout his career, he these early film efforts, we see Godard’s lived philosophy, has been invested in every multiple facets of film production, integrating art and labor, understanding how the two intermingle frequently occupying the role of writer and editor to many of the and are inseparable, much in the same way as his expressed sense films he has directed, also, at times, acting, producing, and, even of the interrelations of fiction films and documentary. Before he occasionally, doing his own cinematography. Godard’s primary began making films, he devoted energy to studying and writing mode of film production is a combination of writing and film for Andre Bazin’s journal Cahiers du cinema. In 1952, directing. In, perhaps his most iconic period of filmmaking, Godard published an article that “amounted to a kind of personal starting with Breathless*** in 1960 and ending with 1967’s theoretical manifesto, as well as a counter argument to an earlier Weekend,* Godard directed and wrote, and often acted in his article written by Bazin in which the critic attacked the 'obsolete films. During this period, Godard made such French New Wave Godard: BREATHLESS—2 classics as A Woman Is a Woman* (1961), Contempt*** (1963), has 95 writing credits, 45 acting credits, and 22 producing Band of Outsiders*** (1964), Alphaville* (1965), Masculin credits. These are some of the other films he directed: Charlotte Féminin* (1966), and 2 or 3 Things I Know About Her*** and Her Boyfriend† (1960 Short), Vivre Sa Vie** (1962), Le (1967). In a line perhaps pointing to the paradox of the rising Petit Soldat*** (1963), Les Carabiniers* (1963), Une Femme New Left in the late 1960s, Masculin Féminin famously suggests Mariée*** (1964), Pierrot le Fou* (1965), Made in U.S.A*** it "could [also] be called The Children of Marx and Coca-Cola.” (1966), A Film Like Any Other§§ (1968), Love and Anger* It is arguable that it is with 1967’s “exhilarating and provocative” (1969), Le Gai Savoir*** (1969), Le Vent d'Est (1970)†, La Chinoise,* a film that floods the viewer with images of “Marx Struggle in Italy** (1971), Vladimir et Rosa‡‡ (1971), Numéro and Mao, modernist paintings, political slogans and an engraving deux* (1975), Here and Elsewhere‡‡‡ (1976), Every Man for from Alice in Wonderland,” in a loose narrative about “five Himself‡ (1980), First Name: Carmen†††† (1983), Hail university students. .who spend their summer vacation in Paris. Mary*(1985), King Lear§§§ (1987), Puissance de la parole* . .studying political texts [and] delivering lectures to each other, (1988 Short), Germany Year 90 Nine Zero* (1991), JLG/JLG: Godard begins a shift to the overtly political. Weekend had Self-Portrait in December‡ (1994 Documentary), 2 x 50 Years of provocatively and cryptically “concluded with the statements French Cinema†† (1995 TV Movie documentary), Histoire(s) du 'end of story' and 'end of cinema.'” Godard “had come to the cinéma†† (1989-1999 TV Mini-Series documentary), The Old conclusion that the world as it was had to change and as the Place** (2000 Documentary), In Praise of Love* (2001), commercial film industry was part of that world” he saw needing Moments choisis des histoire(s) du cinéma**** (2004 change (NewWaveFilm.com). This might have suggested Documentary), and Ecce Homo**** (2006 Short). Godard’s withdrawal from cinema; however, at this point, he *Writer increased his output. This conviction likely played a role in the **Writer, editor hardline stance he helped lead in protest of the 1968 Cannes Film ***Writer, actor Festival. After “most of the filmmakers in competition withdrew ****Writer, editor, producer their films and Louis Malle, Roman Polanski, Monica Vitti, and †Writer, editor, actor Terence Young resigned from the jury,” Godard argued that ††Editor “instead of showing festival films, the forum should be used to †††Writer, editor, cinematographer, producer screen militant films and documentary footage of the [protests] ††††Actor taking place.” Further, “When the festival administration decided ‡Editor, producer that a screening of Carlos Saura’s Peppermint Frappé would go ‡‡Writer, editor, cinematographer, actor ahead as planned, Godard, Truffaut and Saura himself jumped up ‡‡‡Writer, producer on the stage and held onto the curtain to prevent it from opening” ‡‡‡‡Writer, actor, cinematographer, producer (NewWaveFilm.com). This period saw Godard increasingly §Editor, actor turning to the documentary in films such as Far from Vietnam* §§Writer, editor, cinematographer (1967), Sympathy for the Devil* (1968), Cinétracts (1968), See §§§Writer, editor, actor, producer You at Mao* (1970), Pravda** (1970), and 1 P.M.§§§§§ (1971). §§§§Editor, cinematographer Throughout his career, he has often directed promotional shorts §§§§§Writer, cinematographer for some of his feature films, and, on one occasion, he stepped outside of his own work to direct a promotion for Robert Bresson’s heartbreaking Mouchette (1967). In Ro.Go.Pa.G. (1963), Godard collaborated on a film also showcasing several Italian auteurs: Ugo Gregoretti, Pier Paolo Pasolini, and Roberto Rossellini. 18 of his films incorporated both his writing and editing skills. His most recent output has seen a return to the roles that shaped his iconic 1960s work, primarily writing and directing with occasional acting and editing in films such as Film socialisme* (2010), Goodbye to Language*** (2014), and The Image Book† (2018). Barring the fallout from 1968’s controversial Cannes, Godard’s films have been consistently recognized at the festival since the early 1980s when was first nominated for the distinguished Palm d’Or for Sauve la vie (qui peut)* (1981 Documentary). Throughout the decade he was nominated for the Palm d’Or for Passion** (1982), Détective (1985), and Aria (1987). He was again nominated for the Palm d’Or for Nouvelle vague (1990), Éloge de l'amour (2001), Adieu FRANCOIS TRUFFAUT (b. February 6, 1932 in Paris, au langage (2014), and Le livre d'image (2018). Also, at Cannes, France—d. October 21, 1984 (age 52) in Neuilly-sur-Seine, he was nominated for the Un Certain Regard Award for Film Hauts-de-Seine, France) was a French film director, screenwriter, socialisme (2010), and he won the Jury Prize for Adieu au producer, actor, and film critic. He is widely regarded as one of langage (2014) and the Special Award and Palme d'Or Spéciale the founders of the French New Wave. He was nominated for for Le livre d'image (2018). At the 2011 Academy Awards, he Oscars for Best Writing for Les quatre cents coups* (1959, The won an Honorary Award “For passion. For confrontation. For a 400 Blows) and for Best Writing and Best Director for La nuit new kind of cinema.” He was not present for the ceremony. He américaine (1973). He won the OCIC Award and Best Director Godard: BREATHLESS—3 awards and was nominated for the Palm d’Or for Les quatre Honorary Golden Palm at the 2011 Cannes Film Festival. He has cents coups (1959) and was nominated, again, for the Palm d’Or acted in 91 films, and he has also produced 23 films. These are for La peau douce* (1964). He directed 28 films, acted in 16 some of the films he has acted in: À pied, à cheval et en voiture films, wrote for 36 films, and he produced 17 films. These are (1957), Youthful Sinners (1958), Un drôle de dimanche (1958), some of the other films he directed: Une visite (1955 Short), An Angel on Wheels (1959), Breathless* (1960), Classe Tous Shoot the Piano Player (1960), Jules and Jim (1962), Fahrenheit Risques (1960), Seven Days..
Recommended publications
  • December 2014 ONECELEBRATEWITHUS Join the Celebration As We Usher in a New Year of Cinema in Iowa City
    A COLLABORATION WITH DEC FilmScene Staff THE EYE OPENER 12-21 Joe Tiefenthaler, Executive Director Andy Brodie, Program Director Complete info at www.icfilmscene.org/flam Andrew Sherburne, Sunday, December 14th Associate Director A curated week of new releases and restored classics on literature, art and music. Tickets: $35 for non-members / $25 for members / Emily Salmonson, Series Pass: $30 non-members / $20 members. Regular price for individual shows. $15 for supporting role and leading role members Director of Operations / FREE for Founders Circle and Screen Legend Ross Meyer, Head Projectionist and Facilities Manager Join FilmScene in celebrating the one year Dan DeMarco, Theater Staff anniversary of the opening of our downtown Jon Graf, Theater Staff Aaron Holmgren, Theater Staff cinema with a delicious brunch of chicken & DIALOGUE: Director Q&A NEWLY RESTORED! NEWLY RESTORED! waffles, scrambled eggs with local cheeses, Phil Ochs, Theater Staff MUSIC OF THE BURROUGHS: ROME, OPEN CITY Tony Pomales, Theater Staff beignets, mini donuts, mimosas and a cash MOMENT THE MOVIE (1983) (2014) Dir. Roberto Emily Brown, Projectionist bar. While you eat, be entertained by music (2014) Dir. Kevin Wisor. Dir. Howard Brookner. Rossellini. Legendary Kelly Gallagher, Projectionist from the films of our first year and the Iowa A locally-made feature The first and only doc Italian drama about the Kasia Plazinska, Projectionist premiere of an acclaimed short film. doc exploring the art of made with the Nazi occupation of Board of Directors improvised music, shot full participation of writer Rome and the brave few Michael Finlayson, Chair FILMFOODDRINKSMUSIC in Iowa City. William S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Rohmer's Film Theory (1948-1953)
    MARCO GROSOLI FILM THEORY FILM THEORY ERIC ROHMER’S FILM THEORY (1948-1953) IN MEDIA HISTORY IN MEDIA HISTORY FROM ‘ÉCOLE SCHERER’ TO ‘POLITIQUE DES AUTEURS’ MARCO GROSOLI ERIC ROHMER’S FILM THEORY ROHMER’S ERIC In the 1950s, a group of critics writing MARCO GROSOLI is currently Assistant for Cahiers du Cinéma launched one of Professor in Film Studies at Habib Univer- the most successful and influential sity (Karachi, Pakistan). He has authored trends in the history of film criticism: (along with several book chapters and auteur theory. Though these days it is journal articles) the first Italian-language usually viewed as limited and a bit old- monograph on Béla Tarr (Armonie contro fashioned, a closer inspection of the il giorno, Bébert 2014). hundreds of little-read articles by these critics reveals that the movement rest- ed upon a much more layered and in- triguing aesthetics of cinema. This book is a first step toward a serious reassess- ment of the mostly unspoken theoreti- cal and aesthetic premises underlying auteur theory, built around a recon- (1948-1953) struction of Eric Rohmer’s early but de- cisive leadership of the group, whereby he laid down the foundations for the eventual emergence of their full-fledged auteurism. ISBN 978-94-629-8580-3 AUP.nl 9 789462 985803 AUP_FtMh_GROSOLI_(rohmer'sfilmtheory)_rug16.2mm_v02.indd 1 07-03-18 13:38 Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory (1948-1953) Film Theory in Media History Film Theory in Media History explores the epistemological and theoretical foundations of the study of film through texts by classical authors as well as anthologies and monographs on key issues and developments in film theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List of History Films and Videos (PDF)
    Video List in Alphabetical Order Department of History # Title of Video Description Producer/Dir Year 532 1984 Who controls the past controls the future Istanb ul Int. 1984 Film 540 12 Years a Slave In 1841, Northup an accomplished, free citizen of New Dolby 2013 York, is kidnapped and sold into slavery. Stripped of his identity and deprived of dignity, Northup is ultimately purchased by ruthless plantation owner Edwin Epps and must find the strength to survive. Approx. 134 mins., color. 460 4 Months, 3 Weeks and Two college roommates have 24 hours to make the IFC Films 2 Days 235 500 Nations Story of America’s original inhabitants; filmed at actual TIG 2004 locations from jungles of Central American to the Productions Canadian Artic. Color; 372 mins. 166 Abraham Lincoln (2 This intimate portrait of Lincoln, using authentic stills of Simitar 1994 tapes) the time, will help in understanding the complexities of our Entertainment 16th President of the United States. (94 min.) 402 Abe Lincoln in Illinois “Handsome, dignified, human and moving. WB 2009 (DVD) 430 Afghan Star This timely and moving film follows the dramatic stories Zeitgest video 2009 of your young finalists—two men and two very brave women—as they hazard everything to become the nation’s favorite performer. By observing the Afghani people’s relationship to their pop culture. Afghan Star is the perfect window into a country’s tenuous, ongoing struggle for modernity. What Americans consider frivolous entertainment is downright revolutionary in this embattled part of the world. Approx. 88 min. Color with English subtitles 369 Africa 4 DVDs This epic series presents Africa through the eyes of its National 2001 Episode 1 Episode people, conveying the diversity and beauty of the land and Geographic 5 the compelling personal stories of the people who shape Episode 2 Episode its future.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Postmodern Cinema at the Turn of the Millennium: Paul Thomas Anderson’S Magnolia
    Revista de Estudios Norteamericanos, vol. 24, 2020. Seville, Spain, ISSN 1133-309-X, pp. 1-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/REN.2020.i24.01 POST-POSTMODERN CINEMA AT THE TURN OF THE MILLENNIUM: PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON’S MAGNOLIA JESÚS BOLAÑO QUINTERO Universidad de Cádiz [email protected] Received: 20 May 2020 Accepted: 26 July 2020 KEYWORDS Magnolia; Paul Thomas Anderson; post-postmodern cinema; New Sincerity; French New Wave; Jean-Luc Godard; Vivre sa Vie PALABRAS CLAVE Magnolia; Paul Thomas Anderson; cine post-postmoderno; Nueva Sinceridad; Nouvelle Vague; Jean-Luc Godard; Vivir su vida ABSTRACT Starting with an analysis of the significance of the French New Wave for postmodern cinema, this essay sets out to make a study of Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia (1999) as the film that marks the beginning of what could be considered a paradigm shift in American cinema at the end of the 20th century. Building from the much- debated passing of postmodernism, this study focuses on several key postmodern aspects that take a different slant in this movie. The film points out the value of aspects that had lost their meaning within the fiction typical of postmodernism—such as the absence of causality; sincere honesty as opposed to destructive irony; or the loss of faith in Lyotardian meta-narratives. We shall look at the nature of the paradigm shift to link it to the desire to overcome postmodern values through a recovery of Romantic ideas. RESUMEN Partiendo de un análisis del significado de la Nouvelle Vague para el cine postmoderno, este trabajo presenta un estudio de Magnolia (1999), de Paul Thomas Anderson, como obra sobre la que pivota lo que se podría tratar como un cambio de paradigma en el cine estadounidense de finales del siglo XX.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117
    The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOD, RICHARD #1117 September 1989 - June 1997 Biography: Richard Roud ( 1929-1989), as director of both the New York and London Film Festivals, was responsible for both discovering and introducing to a wider audience many of the important directors of the latter half th of the 20 - century (many of whom he knew personally) including Bernardo Bertolucci, Robert Bresson, Luis Buiiuel, R.W. Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard, Werner Herzog, Terry Malick, Ermanno Ohni, Jacques Rivette and Martin Scorsese. He was an author of books on Jean-Marie Straub, Jean-Luc Godard, Max Ophuls, and Henri Langlois, as well as the editor of CINEMA: A CRITICAL DICTIONARY. In addition, Mr. Roud wrote extensive criticism on film, the theater and other visual arts for The Manchester Guardian and Sight and Sound and was an occasional contributor to many other publications. At his death he was working on an authorized biography of Fran9ois Truffaut and a book on New Wave film. Richard Roud was a Fulbright recipient and a Chevalier in the Legion of Honor. Scope and contents: The Roud Collection (9 Paige boxes, 2 Manuscript boxes and 3 Packages) consists primarily of book research, articles by RR and printed matter related to the New York Film Festival and prominent directors. Material on Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut and Henri Langlois is particularly extensive. Though considerably smaller, the Correspondence file contains personal letters from many important directors (see List ofNotable Correspondents). The Photographs file contains an eclectic group of movie stills.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of the Nouvelle Vague
    ARTICLES · Cinema Comparat/ive Cinema · Vol. I · No. 2. · 2013 · 77-82 Paradoxes of the Nouvelle Vague Marcos Uzal ABSTRACT This essay begins at the start of the magazine Cahiers du cinéma and with the film-making debut of five of its main members: François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette and Jean-Luc Godard. At the start they have shared approaches, tastes, passions and dislikes (above all, about a group of related film-makers from so-called ‘classical cinema’). Over the course of time, their aesthetic and political positions begin to divide them, both as people and in terms of their work, until they reach a point where reconciliation is not posible between the ‘midfield’ film-makers (Truffaut and Chabrol) and the others, who choose to control their conditions or methods of production: Rohmer, Rivette and Godard. The essay also proposes a new view of work by Rivette and Godard, exploring a relationship between their interest in film shoots and montage processes, and their affinities with various avant-gardes: early Russian avant-garde in Godard’s case and in Rivette’s, 1970s American avant-gardes and their European translation. KEYWORDS Nouvelle Vague, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Eric Rohmer, Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, radical, politics, aesthetics, montage. 77 PARADOXES OF THE NOUVELLE VAGUE In this essay the term ‘Nouvelle Vague’ refers that had emerged from it: they considered that specifically to the five film-makers in this group cinematic form should be explored as a kind who emerged from the magazine Cahiers du of contraband, using the classic art of mise-en- cinéma: Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette, Jean-Luc scène rather than a revolutionary or modernist Godard, Claude Chabrol and François Truffaut.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
    Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author
    [Show full text]
  • ENG 494: the Essay-Film's Recycling Of
    Nandini Chandra, Study Abroad Application Location Specific Course Proposal The Essay-Film’s Recycling of “Waste”: Lessons from the Left Bank *ENG 494: Study Abroad (3) The essay film shuns the mimetic mode, opting to construct a reality rather than reproduce one. Some of its signature tools in this project are: experimental montage techniques, recycling of still photographs, and the use of found footage to immerse the viewer in an alternative and yet uncannily plausible reality. Chris Marker, Alain Resnais, and Agnes Varda are three giants of this genre who shaped this playful filmic language in France. The essay-film is their paradoxical contribution to crafting a collective experience out of the minutiae of individual self-expressions. Our course will focus particularly on this trio of directors’ self-reflexive and heretical relationship with the theme of “waste”— industrial, cultural and human—which forms a central preoccupation in their films. Many of these films use the trope of travel to show wastelands created by the history of capitalist wars and colonialism. We will examine the diverse ways in which the essay-film alters our understanding of “waste” and turns it into something mysteriously productive. This in turn leads us to the question of the “surplus population”—those thrown out of the circuits of capitalist production and left to fend for themselves—as a source of potentially utopian possibilities. Capitalism’s well-known “creative destruction” is ironically paralleled by these films’ focus on the productivity of waste products, and the creative powers of capitalism’s outcastes. 1. The course will historiciZe the critical-lyrical practice of the essay-film, looking at the films themselves as well as key scholarship on essay-films.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Sheet and Opposition to American Motion Picture Classification in the 1960S
    The Green Sheet and Opposition to American Motion Picture Classification in the 1960s By Zachary Saltz University of Kansas, Copyright 2011 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Film and Media Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. John Tibbetts ________________________________ Dr. Michael Baskett ________________________________ Dr. Chuck Berg Date Defended: 19 April 2011 ii The Thesis Committee for Zachary Saltz certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: The Green Sheet and Opposition to American Motion Picture Classification in the 1960s ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. John Tibbetts Date approved: 19 April 2011 iii ABSTRACT The Green Sheet was a bulletin created by the Film Estimate Board of National Organizations, and featured the composite movie ratings of its ten member organizations, largely Protestant and represented by women. Between 1933 and 1969, the Green Sheet was offered as a service to civic, educational, and religious centers informing patrons which motion pictures contained potentially offensive and prurient content for younger viewers and families. When the Motion Picture Association of America began underwriting its costs of publication, the Green Sheet was used as a bartering device by the film industry to root out municipal censorship boards and legislative bills mandating state classification measures. The Green Sheet underscored tensions between film industry executives such as Eric Johnston and Jack Valenti, movie theater owners, politicians, and patrons demanding more integrity in monitoring changing film content in the rapidly progressive era of the 1960s. Using a system of symbolic advisory ratings, the Green Sheet set an early precedent for the age-based types of ratings the motion picture industry would adopt in its own rating system of 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Emotion in Godard's Films Anuja Madan (Cineaction 80
    The Language of Emotion in Godard's Films Anuja Madan (Cineaction 80 2010) So, to the question ʻWhat is Cinema?ʼ, I would reply: the expression of lofty sentiments. —Godard, in an essay 1 Nana: Isnʼt love the only truth?2 Emotion in the New Wave films is a fraught concept. Critics like Raymond Durgnat have commented that the New Wave films are characterized by emotional “dryness,” but such a view fails to engage with the complexity of the films.3 In what may seem like a paradoxical statement, these films display a passionate concern for the status of emotional life while being simultaneously engaged in the critique of emotion. This paper seeks to discuss the complex dynamics of emotion in three of Jean-Luc Godardʼs films—Vivre Sa Vie (My Life to Live, 1962), Alphaville, une Étrange aventure de Lemmy Caution (Alphaville, A Strange Adventure of Lemmy Caution, 1965) and Week End (1967). All of them belong to the fertile period of the 60s in which Godardʼs aesthetic strategies became increasingly daring. These will be examined in relation to some of his critical writings. An important paradigm within which Godardʼs films will be analyzed is that of cinemaʼs relationship to reality. A foundational principle of the New Wave was the faith in the intrinsic realism of the cinema, something Bazin had expounded upon. However, according to Godard, Bazinʼs model of cinema was novelistic, the realist description of relationships existent elsewhere. In his model, the director constructs his film, dialogue, and mise-en- scene, at every point: Reality is formed as the camera is framing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Men
    A Sony Pictures Classics Release Armada Films and Why Not Productions present OF GODS AND MEN A film by Xavier Beauvois Starring Lambert Wilson and Michael Lonsdale France's official selection for the 83rd Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film 2010 Official Selections: Toronto International Film Festival | Telluride Film Festival | New York Film Festival Nominee: 2010 European Film Award for Best Film Nominee: 2010 Carlo di Palma European Cinematographer, European Film Award Winner: Grand Prix; Ecumenical Jury Prize - 2010Cannes Film Festival Winner: Best Foreign Language Film, 2010 National Board of Review Winner: FIPRESCI Award for Best Foreign Language Film of the Year, 2011 Palm Springs International Film Festival www.ofgodsandmenmovie.com Release Date (NY/LA): 02/25/2011 | TRT: 120 min MPAA: Rated PG-13 | Language: French East Coast Publicist West Coast Publicist Distributor Sophie Gluck & Associates Block-Korenbrot Sony Pictures Classics Sophie Gluck Ziggy Kozlowski Carmelo Pirrone 124 West 79th St. Melody Korenbrot Lindsay Macik New York, NY 10024 110 S. Fairfax Ave., Ste 310 550 Madison Avenue Phone (212) 595-2432 Los Angeles, CA 90036 New York, NY 10022 [email protected] Phone (323) 634-7001 Phone (212) 833-8833 Fax (323) 634-7030 Fax (212) 833-8844 SYNOPSIS Eight French Christian monks live in harmony with their Muslim brothers in a monastery perched in the mountains of North Africa in the 1990s. When a crew of foreign workers is massacred by an Islamic fundamentalist group, fear sweeps though the region. The army offers them protection, but the monks refuse. Should they leave? Despite the growing menace in their midst, they slowly realize that they have no choice but to stay… come what may.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mode of Production and Distribution
    Chapter Three A Mode of Production and Distribution An Economic Concept: “The Small Budget Film,” Was it Myth or Reality? t has often been assumed that the New Wave provoked a sudden Ibreak in the production practices of French cinema, by favoring small budget films. In an industry characterized by an inflationary spiral of ever-increasing production costs, this phenomenon is sufficiently original to warrant investigation. Did most of the films considered to be part of this movement correspond to this notion of a small budget? We would first have to ask: what, in 1959, was a “small budget” movie? The average cost of a film increased from roughly $218,000 in 1955 to $300,000 in 1959. That year, at the moment of the emergence of the New Wave, 133 French films were produced; of these, 33 cost more than $400,000 and 74 cost more than $200,000. That leaves 26 films with a budget of less than $200,000, or “low budget productions;” however, that can hardly be used as an adequate criterion for movies to qualify as “New Wave.”1 Even so, this budgetary trait has often been employed to establish a genealogy for the movement. It involves, primarily, “marginal” films produced outside the dominant commercial system. Two Small Budget Films, “Outside the System” From the point of view of their mode of production, two titles are often imposed as reference points: Jean-Pierre Melville’s self-produced Silence of 49 A Mode of Production and Distribution the Sea, 1947, and Agnes Varda’s La Pointe courte (Short Point), made seven years later, in 1954.
    [Show full text]