Newsletter No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter No Newsletter No. 146 March 2011 Price: $5.00 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 146 (March 2011) AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED Council President Vice President Peter Weston Dale Dixon National Herbarium of New South Wales Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney Mrs Macquaries Road Mrs Macquaries Road Sydney, NSW 2000 Sydney, NSW 2000 Tel: (02) 9231 8171 Tel: (02) 9231 8111 Fax: (02) 9241 2797 Fax: (02) 9251 7231 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Treasurer Secretary Frank Zich Gillian Brown Australian Tropical Herbarium School of Botany E2 building, J.C.U. Cairns Campus The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010 PO Box 6811 Tel: (03) 8344 7150 Cairns, Qld 4870 Fax: (03) 9347 5460 Tel: (07) 4059 5014 Email: [email protected] Fax: (07) 4091 8888 Email: [email protected] Councillor Pina Milne Councillor National Herbarium of Victoria Tanya Scharaschkin Royal Botanic Gardens School of Natural Resource Sciences Birdwood Ave Queensland University of Technology South Yarra VIC 3141 PO Box 2434 AUSTRALIA Brisbane, Qld 4001 Tel: (03) 9252 2309 Tel: (07) 3138 1395 Fax: (03) 9252 2423 Fax: (07) 3138 1535 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Other Constitutional Bodies Public Officer Hansjörg Eichler Research Committee Annette Wilson Bill Barker Australian Biological Resources Study Betsy Jackes Dept of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts Greg Leach GPO Box 787 Kristina Lemson Canberra, ACT 2601 Chris Quinn Chair: Dale Dixon, Vice President Affiliate Society Grant applications close: 14 March 2011. Papua New Guinea Botanical Society ASBS Website www.anbg.gov.au/asbs Cover image: Alloxylon flammeum (Proteaceae), Webmaster: Murray Fagg reproduced with the permission of David Mackay (the Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research artist) and RBG Sydney. Australian National Herbarium Email: [email protected] Publication dates of previous issue Austral.Syst.Bot.Soc.Newslett. 144–5 (September–December 2010 issue) Hardcopy: 17 June 2011; ASBS Website: 15 June 2011 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 146 (March 2011) From the President Firstly, it is my great pleasure to draw your home page. The purpose of this new page is to attention to the announcement in this issue of the disseminate information on advertised jobs, ASBS Newsletter by Secretary Gillian Brown scholarships, fellowships and grants as well as that the two special resolutions that had recently other opportunities open to plant systematists. been put to members, and for which a formal vote As well as having links to permanent, regular was held at a General Meeting held on 15 March opportunities such as the Hansjörg Eichler Awards, at the National Herbarium of New South Wales, this page will also feature irregular and one-off were both passed overwhelmingly. ASBS is now opportunities such as the notice that is presently the Australasian Systematic Botany Society there for the Second National Postgraduate and the rules governing the way that we change Training Workshop in Systematics, to be held at the Society’s rules have now been brought into the University of Adelaide from 25-30 September line with the legislation under which ASBS is 2011. If you are aware of any such opportunities incorporated. for which notices have not already been posted on The change to our Society’s name now makes this page, please email the relevant information us an international society, albeit one that is either to me or to ASBS Secretary Gillian Brown. still firmly rooted in Australia as a result of its ASBS Council was recently approached by the incorporation in the Australian Capital Territory Australian office of The Nature Conservancy and the fact that the great majority of our members (TNC) to administer a postgraduate scholarship in are Australian botanists. However, the name taxonomy on its behalf. The Nature Conservancy change sends a message to botanists based in New is a Non-Government Organisation with a mission Zealand, New Caledonia, Vanuatu, Fiji and New to “preserve the plants, animals and natural Guinea that we welcome them as members and communities that represent the diversity of life as potential office holders of ASBS. The change on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they to Rule 30(5)b will allow future ASBS Councils need to survive” (http://www.nature.org/aboutus/ to be reasonably responsive to changes in our visionmission/index.htm). TNC was established in Society’s environment without having to go to the the USA in 1951 and now has chapters or offices extraordinary lengths to which recent Councils in all American states and 31 other countries. It have had to go to achieve sensible and sometimes is perhaps best known for its impressive record mandatory rule changes. of conserving threatened habitats by buying and ASBS Council had to work hard to organise the managing land but it also invests a lot of money in ballot for these Special Resolutions and to ensure support of conservation-related scientific research that over 75% of financial members voted, as projects. ASBS Council is presently negotiating required by the old rule 30(5)b. In particular, this proposal with TNC and hopefully we will be Secretary Gillian Brown and Councillor able to reach a mutually beneficial agreement in (Memberships) Pina Milne, had to contribute many the near future. hours of their time to administer this process. I am The International Botanical Congress is fast very grateful to both of them for their hard and approaching and ASBS is formally involved with effective work and to all of the members who made the conference in several ways. Firstly, the Society the effort to participate actively in the running of is sponsoring two symposia: Sym104: Patterns ASBS by voting on the Special Resolutions, either and Processes in the Evolution and Biogeography in person at the meeting or by proxy. of the Australasian Flora (Organisers: Dr Maria Some of you may have noticed a new page Gandolfo and Dr Mike Bayly) and Sym083: that Webmaster Murray Fagg has put up on the A Perspective in Species Radiation – the New ASBS website called “Opportunities in Plant Zealand Story (Organiser: Dr Ilse Breitwieser). Systematics”. There is a link to this in the “latest As part of our sponsorship agreement with the news” column on the right hand side of the ASBS IBC we will be providing at least $6,000 in 1 Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter 146 (March 2011) travel assistance to ASBS student members. July 2011 at the conference venue, The Melbourne Applications for students presenting a poster or Convention & Exhibition Centre. ASBS members oral presentation are now open and need to be with will get an opportunity to socialize together in one the Secretary by the 31st of May 2011. Further place at the ASBS conference dinner, which will details and application forms can be found on our be held at University House (The University of website at http://www.anbg.gov.au/asbs/student. Melbourne) on the evening of Friday the 29th of html. Professor Mike Crisp of the Australian July at 7pm. A three course meal will be laid on National University will be delivering the Nancy with drinks included, at a cost of $75 per person. Burbidge Lecture, “Evolution of the Australian ASBS members and other conference participants flora”, as one of the IBC plenary lectures. The can register for it through the IBC website (http:// ASBS Annual General Meeting will be held at www.ibc2011.com/Social.htm). 1.30 pm on the free afternoon of Wednesday 27th Peter Weston Articles Acacia and the IBC presents these views. The paper by McNeill & Turland (2010) explains the processes adopted Bruce Maslin W.A. Herbarium, Department of Environment in Vienna and recommends that the correct way and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley forward for those objecting to the outcome would Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983. be to make a counter conservation proposal to Email: [email protected] again move the type. This recommendation has Most readers will probably be aware of the on- not been taken up and the scene appears to be going Acacia generic name issue. In a nutshell, set for an ‘interesting’ discussion in Melbourne. Orchard & Maslin (2003) proposed to change the Most recently Thiele et al. (2011) summarized the type of Acacia from an African species (A. nilotica) issues involved and concluded that (1) the “Vienna to an Australian one (A. penninervis). Following a process was fundamentally sound, and that robust debate in literature and elsewhere the matter continuance of this argument in its current form was assessed by the duly appointed committees is damaging to the international nomenclatural of IAPT (i.e. the then-called Committee for consensus”, (2) “that reversing the decision Spermatophyta1 and the General Committee) who except through standard processes would set a both recommended acceptance of the proposal dangerous precedent and would, in the long term, with the required 60% majority. The General encourage nomenclature by pressure group rather Committee’s recommendation was subsequently than nomenclature by due process” and (3) “the discussed at the Nomenclature Session of the 17th decision should stand and the world should move International Botanical Congress in Vienna, 2005, on”. These are sentiments that I fully endorse. and following a vote the recommendation was There are significant nomenclatural, and thus upheld; the matter was then ratified at the Plenary practical, consequences associated with the Session of the IBC and Acacia with a conserved resolution of this matter. type is now included in the Vienna Code. Details of this history are on the WorldWideWattle If the original Vienna decision is upheld then website (web ref.
Recommended publications
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Bifaria Maslin
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia bifaria Maslin Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.949). Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.950). (dig.16967). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2005 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2005 ANBG © M. Fagg, 2010 Source: Australian Plant Image Index (a.30952). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2002 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Acacia bifaria occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Family Fabaceae Distribution Occurs from Ravensthorpe WSW to the Fitzgerald R. (c. 30 km due E of Jerramungup), south-western W.A. Description Prostrate or semi-prostrate shrub to 0.5 m high and 2 m across. Branchlets slightly to prominently flexuose, glabrous. Stipules persistent. Phyllodes continuous with branchlets, bifariously decurrent and forming opposite wings with each one extending to the next below, 1–3.5 cm long, 4–10 mm wide, coriaceous, green to subglaucous, glabrous except axils densely and minutely resin-haired; margins occasionally undulate; free portion of phyllode with obviously rounded adaxial margin, 5–15 mm long, excentrically mucronate, with main nerve ±obscure or superficially absent; gland not prominent. Inflorescences rudimentary, 1-headed racemes with axes 0.5–1.5 mm long; peduncles 2–12 mm long, glabrous, sometimes descending in fruit; heads globular, 16–23-flowered, light golden. Flowers 5-merous; sepals ±free; petals nerveless. Pods strongly curved to twice-coiled, ±terete, to 2 cm long, 2–3 mm wide, thinly crustaceous, black, ±glabrous. Seeds longitudinal, oblong, c.
    [Show full text]
  • 080057-10.010.Pdf
    'ra^e,.,'oq fJpurrurlerdIo sllnscrcq1 (aDnuuuo)pue aDJolV etq Surpnlcur) seues (tggt) s.uuqlue8 lo Jequnu c uror3 scrrads urplral otepouluoJJu ol paltelc st?,\\'lussu4 Deplolpq)lnd uo\ces 'asoql Jo euO pezluSotereJe,r t;xcl cueueiur1ur ,,irau.+o roqrunu o qarq,r utnlJrJyJo uorlErrJrsselc ,teu c pesodordpeq (Z/6t) lcssu1 ill6l ot rorrd uortJostJunsrp c sE suonrJrJrssclc(9861 T 8/61) s,^etpedur poldcttc surtao1o1y erl l lnq dnori l€crlrlreuu sc pezruSoce.l ueeq Buo\rqamluuuo) aql sepoll,{qdtuerrncop Jo snonuUuoJqtl,r ,rJrJy.+o sorJeds^\eJ ,{lo^rtulor oql elrpouurocco ol 'qluog ('qtueg) aDiDlVpuu'qtuefi aDnuuuo) 'seuas o,rl pazru8o...r(tggl) uuqlueg r,l,n.'y.lo luJuIrJI ..urLUltlnvlr\ nr,'lJ,, l]ururuJq|lol Jql ur uolsnl]urro-} elqr]ln?^u.ru seucu eqt luqt os pezll€ur.toleq ot peeutuqt esoqt,{luo'Jleq pJpnlJur 'elnuru ?Jpscllsr.rolculrqo eseqt qlr,r s:rr:ds ylelog suoqcelbrdelrl uroq Jo selccsol pecnpereru qclq,nrJo'sfur,r olrsoddolueururo:d Surur.to1 puu sulels eql uo luclinocpJcqtre eir qrrqmsepo11f,qd {q PeTrrelJuJl]tlcorl lsourpuu uerlultsnv ulslselA ur cruropucJlll lcdrd s^rq]ul pepnlJursorJeds aqJ uo!lJnpor}rI 'lcrlrdXtottol enJ'DlDuplddDy to o^tlsloJ '( esolce lpul'l Draldlp V uo pasrq) Ipuald H DUD!tt\ouapllltV puu'DllDliq yJo a^Dulelasolc u ''\tueguatdornol;l nnn)V nlnLuaDVol pctulersuees puu lcuqxe Xlqrssod sr selceds slrll : llent{ C i^llqnp^ V rol pepl^o.rdsr uorldulsop V urls^uhtrDlltuDrnt J\1^pull usrolr'\tr(lput1) DJaM{rDld 'rD^ 'qluoB DsolnpuDl;lttl.tu^'DtDlD lu^ '{lotlnlu 'sorler.nr^lnoj Sursr.rclurocsu po,rer^,rou sr ..,^ercedsotltpuu
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Hermannia L. (Malvaceae): a Taxonomic Revision of the Genus
    Systematics of Hermannia L. (Malvaceae): A Taxonomic Revision of the Genus. by David Gwynne-Evans Thesis presented for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN 31 Oct 2015 University of Cape Town Supervised by Prof. Terry Hedderson The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town CONTENTS Systematics of Hermannia L. (Malvaceae): ....................................................................... i A Taxonomic Revision of the Genus. ................................................................................. i Contents ......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................. xiii List of Tables .............................................................................................................. xxii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... xxiii Abstract ....................................................................................................................... xxv
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly and Disassembly of Bird Pollination Communities at the Cape of Africa
    Assembly and disassembly of bird pollination communities at the Cape of Africa by Sjirk Geerts Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Stellenbosch University Department of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Natural Sciences Supervisor: Dr. A. Pauw March 2011 Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, unless to the extent explicitly stated otherwise (Chapter 6 and 8), that I am the owner of the copyright thereof and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. November 2010 Copyright © 2010 University of Stellenbosch All rights reserved 1 Abstract With the current global decline in pollinators, and the concurrent decline in plant species, pollination research is becoming increasingly important. However, studies outside Europe and North-America and on groups other than insects are needed to make generalisations possible. In this thesis I study how pollination structures plant and bird communities in a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa. I show that bird-plant pollination mutualisms are an important ecological factor structuring ornithophilous Proteaceae and nectar-feeding bird communities. This close association between plant and bird communities suggests an important role for community wide pollination mutualisms. How these mutualisms disassemble in reaction to a range of anthropogenic impacts is determined. Firstly, I use experimental manipulation of honeybee density to test whether honeybee farming affects nectar-feeding birds. Hive addition increased honeybee abundance far above natural levels but nectar-feeding bird pollinators were not consistently affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 8052/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: Galaxy Lithium Australia Limited 1.3. Property details Property: Mining Lease 74/244 Local Government Area: Shire of Ravensthorpe Colloquial name: Mt Cattlin Project 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 80 Mechanical Removal Mineral Production 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Granted Decision Date: 30 August 2018 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description The vegetation of the application area is broadly mapped as the following Beard vegetation associations: 352: Medium woodland; York gum; and 934: Shrublands; mallee scrub ( Eucalyptus nutans ) (GIS Database). A flora and vegetation survey was conducted over the application area by botanists from Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd (Mattiske) during December 2017. Previous flora and vegetation surveys by ENV Australia in April 2008 and Botanica Consulting in 2008 partly overlapped the application area. The following vegetation associations were recorded within the application area (Mattiske, 2018): W1: Eucalyptus spp. mid mallee woodland dominated by Eucalyptus myriadena subsp. myriadena over Templetonia retusa , Rhagodia ?crassifolia and Dodonaea ptarmicaefolia mid sparse shrubland over Austrostipa puberula , Austrostipa elegantissima and Rytidosperma caespitosum isolated grasses on brown clay-loam soils on slopes. W2: Eucalyptus oleosa subsp. corvina mid mallee woodland over Daviesia scoparia mid sparse shrubland over Acacia erinacea , Rhagodia ?crassifolia and Sclerolaena uniflora low sparse shrubland on brown clay-loam soils on slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Peuce 2 Colours
    Association of Societies for Growing Australian Plants ACACIA STUDY GROUP NEWSLETTER Group Leader Newsletter Editor Esther Brueggemeier Bill Aitchison 28 Staton Cr, Westlake, Vic 3337 13 Conos Court, Donvale, Vic 3111 Phone 0411 148874 Phone (03) 98723583 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] No. 104 March 2009 ISSN 1035-4638 !" " called drought tolerant plants, gave up in exhaustion as the Contents Page air sucked away every last drop of moisture. From the Leader 1 After January, I received many comments about which Vale – Irene Cullen 2 plants had survived this ordeal the best. It seems Welcome 2 Eremophilas and Acacias have triumphed with flying Feature Plant – Acacia peuce 2 colours. Of course, we always knew Acacias were hardy, and some more than others. The biggest surprise for me this Small and Interesting Wattles 2 season was the resilience of the Acacia cognata species, Cranky Wattles 4 particularly, our newest cultivar, Acacia 'Fettuccine'. They Notes From Members 5 look so soft and delicate yet stood up strong as if to say Wattle Recipe Corner 5 'Bring it on . .' they continue to grow lush and bright green. An Accidental Discovery 6 Acacias are simply one of the toughest plants on the planet. Acacia Flour 7 Cancer Fighting Wattle Seeds 8 John Facey's recent comment in 'Growing Australian' March Talking Wattles 8 edition, sums it up nicely when he says, “I reckon that Acacia peuce 9 Acacia cardiophylla is so tough and adaptable that it could Study Group Photo Library 14 be grown on the Moon.” Study Group Membership 14 Seed Bank 14 We are adding two new features to our newsletters: WATTLE NEWSFLASH: Includes interesting tidbits and From The Leader amazing discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol4(3) Pp 1-9 Maslin.PMD
    TheConservation role an relevance Science W.of taxonomyAust. 4 (3) in : 1–9the conservation(2002) and utilisation of Australian Acacias 1 The role and relevance of taxonomy in the conservation and utilisation of Australian Acacias BRUCE R. MASLIN1 1Department of Conservation and Land Management, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Email: [email protected] SUMMARY In biology, taxonomy is defined as the science of delimiting organisms, naming them and determining their relationships. It is the foundation upon which all biological sciences rely. Acacia is the largest genus of flowering plants in Australia (comprising almost 1 000 species) and is an important component of many ecosystems, particularly in arid and semi- arid areas. The species exhibit considerable morphological, ecological and biological variation and as such offer considerable scope for economic, social and commercial utilisation. In order to undertake effective conservation, utilisation and management of this enormous resource it is essential to have meaningfully defined, and named, biological entities (e.g. species and infraspecific taxa). The provision of names through taxonomic research is fundamentally important because names are the ‘hooks’ by which information about taxa is stored, retrieved and exchanged. Taxonomic keys are the tools that enable us to identify specimens. In a large genus like Acacia, electronic multi-access keys have advantages over conventional paper-based keys. Voucher specimens, which enable names to be verified, provide an important mechanism for protecting the value of information assembled for taxa. The implications for Australia of the proposal to divide Acacia into five genera are discussed briefly. INTRODUCTION combined, and more than occurs on the entire continent of Africa where 144 species are recorded (Maslin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • South-West Ravensthorpe Greenstone Belt
    Conservation Science W. Aust. 8 (3) : 313–332 (2013) Flora and vegetation of greenstone formations of the Yilgarn Craton: south-west Ravensthorpe Greenstone Belt WENDY A THOMPSON, JESSICA ALLEN AND ROSEMARY JASPER Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia, 6946. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT A quadrat-based survey of the flora of the south-west region of the Ravensthorpe Greenstone Belt identified 321 taxa, including six taxa of conservation significance and three weed species. All of the conservation-listed taxa were known to the area. Range extensions were recorded for three taxa and additional collections of two Austrostipa species currently under taxonomic description were made. Six community types were derived from statistical classification of the 50 quadrats. These community types were similar to those described from other parts of the Ravensthorpe Greenstone Belt. As with the other greenstone belts of the Yilgarn Craton, soil chemical parameters and site physical characteristics were influential in delineating community types. Only a small portion of the study area is in the conservation estate; mining and exploration pressures remain the primary threat to this species-rich area. Keywords: classification, Esperance Plains, Fitzgerald Biosphere, floristic diversity, ultramafics, vegetation communities INTRODUCTION target area of the Ravensthorpe Greenstone Belt are roughly 33° 30’ S, 33° 50’ S and 119° 45’ E, 120° 05’ E, Recent surveys of the flora and vegetation of the Yilgarn respectively. The land tenure for the greenstone belt, Craton have identified patterns of high beta-diversity located within the Ravensthorpe Shire, includes freehold, between banded ironstone ranges and associated unallocated crown land and crown land, including the greenstone belts (Gibson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Biome Shifts in Lineage Diversification
    The Role of Biome Shifts in Lineage Diversification Esther Elizabeth Dale Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Department of Botany, University of Otago November 2018 II Abstract This thesis examines the role of biomes in lineage diversification. It explores whether biome conservatism, the tendency to remain in ancestral biomes, constrains diversification, and tests whether biome shifts are linked to characteristics of particular biomes, clades or traits. This work focuses on a series of radiations in Australia and New Zealand. Using the hyper-diverse genus Acacia in Australia, Species Distribution Models (SDM) were used to predict distributions and niche traits of 481 species in 19 clades across two biome typologies. Diversification was not constrained to any biomes, with most species (94%) occupying multiple biomes, but diversification was greatest in those biomes currently occupying larger areas. New Zealand groups (Poaceae, Melicytus, Myrsine and Pseudopanax) with small scale radiations (< 25 species) were then investigated in relation to occupancy of the three main biomes (Forest, Open and Alpine). A temporal sequence of biome availability in New Zealand allowed an examination of diversification in the context of the directional transition from forest to more open biomes. A combination of methods including SDM, biogeographical models, and trait measurements of plants grown in a common garden were utilised to explore the importance of biome shifts during diversification, the relationship between trait shifts and biome shifts, and ask if biome conservatism was prevalent in the different clades. Biome conservatism did not constrain diversification in New Zealand lineages. Biome shifts were generally frequent and more closely related to extrinsic biome factors like biome age, biome availability and relative environmental similarity between biomes, rather than to intrinsic features of lineages, such as clade size, diversification rate or age.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Vascular Plant Taxa SWAFR
    SWAFR - IBRA - Native Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 22/06/2016 11:08:17 AM This analysis uses a pro tem definition of the SWAFR that served to define the study area. It was based on the collection of IBRA 6.1 bioregions most closely approximating the original definition of the Southwest Province by Beard (1980). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2016) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. Native vascular taxa with current names Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFIBR with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_NATIVE. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. SWAFR - IBRA Area (ha): 29,851,921 Records: 365,276 Taxa: Native 8,133 Endemics: 3,663 Families: 133 Genera: 720 Conservation Status: P1 442 P2 559 P3 596 P4 297 T 394 X 6 MS Status: ms 50 pn 838 pub 7,245 Hybrids: 38 Rank: Species 6,648 Subsp. 1,485 Top 10 families (native) Top 10 genera (native) Species Records Species Records Myrtaceae 1396 64580 Acacia 513 24062 Fabaceae 1118 53100 Eucalyptus 372 19538 Proteaceae 910 40648 Grevillea 245 9215 Orchidaceae 421 14514 Stylidium 217 9936 Ericaceae 361 17127 Leucopogon 210 9322 Asteraceae 304 13639 Banksia 208 8784 Cyperaceae 258 10697 Melaleuca 191 11084 Stylidiaceae 226 10591 Caladenia 177 5440 Goodeniaceae 220 11545 Verticordia 139 7099 Malvaceae 183 6085 Gastrolobium 111 4679 Wednesday, 22 June 2016 Page 1 of 50 Endemics Species Status Acacia acellerata Acacia aciphylla Acacia aculeiformis Acacia adjutrices P3 Acacia aemula subsp.
    [Show full text]