Plant Management and Biodiversity Conservation in Náhuatl
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Redalyc.INVENTARIO FLORÍSTICO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL CAÑÓN
Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México ISSN: 0366-2128 [email protected] Sociedad Botánica de México México ESPINOSA-JIMÉNEZ, JOSEFA ANAHÍ; PÉREZ-FARRERA, MIGUEL ÁNGEL; MARTÍNEZ-CAMILO, RUBÉN INVENTARIO FLORÍSTICO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL CAÑÓN DEL SUMIDERO, CHIAPAS, MÉXICO Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México, núm. 89, diciembre, 2011, pp. 37-82 Sociedad Botánica de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57721249004 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Bol.Soc.Bot.Méx. 89: 37-82 (2011) TAXONOMÍA Y FLORÍSTICA INVENTARIO FLORÍSTICO DEL PARQUE NACIONAL CAÑÓN DEL SUMIDERO, CHIAPAS, MÉXICO JOSEFA ANAHÍ ESPINOSA-JIMÉNEZ1, MIGUEL ÁNGEL PÉREZ-FARRERA Y RUBÉN MARTÍNEZ-CAMILO Herbario Eizi Matuda, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas 1Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen: Se realizó el inventario florístico del Parque Nacional Cañón del Sumidero, Chiapas, México. Treinta y tres salidas de campo se hicieron de 2007 a 2008 y se consultaron y revisaron bases de datos de herbarios. Se registraron 1,298 especies, 632 géneros, 135 familias y 58 infraespecies. Las familias más representativas corresponden a Fabaceae (126 especies y 52 géneros) y Asteraceae (107 especies y 65 géneros). Los géneros más diversos fueron Ipomoea (18), Tillandsia (17) y Peperomia (16). Además, 625 especies se clasificaron como hierbas y 1,179 especies como autótrofas. -
Hybridization in Compositae
Hybridization in Compositae Dr. Edward Schilling University of Tennessee Tennessee – not Texas, but we still grow them big! [email protected] Ayres Hall – University of Tennessee campus in Knoxville, Tennessee University of Tennessee Leucanthemum vulgare – Inspiration for school colors (“Big Orange”) Compositae – Hybrids Abound! Changing view of hybridization: once consider rare, now known to be common in some groups Hotspots (Ellstrand et al. 1996. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 93: 5090-5093) Comparison of 5 floras (British Isles, Scandanavia, Great Plains, Intermountain, Hawaii): Asteraceae only family in top 6 in all 5 Helianthus x multiflorus Overview of Presentation – Selected Aspects of Hybridization 1. More rather than less – an example from the flower garden 2. Allopolyploidy – a changing view 3. Temporal diversity – Eupatorium (thoroughworts) 4. Hybrid speciation/lineages – Liatrinae (blazing stars) 5. Complications for phylogeny estimation – Helianthinae (sunflowers) Hybrid: offspring between two genetically different organisms Evolutionary Biology: usually used to designated offspring between different species “Interspecific Hybrid” “Species” – problematic term, so some authors include a description of their species concept in their definition of “hybrid”: Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2. Genetic “additivity” Presence of genes from each parent Recognition of Hybrids: 1. Morphological “intermediacy” Actually – mixture of discrete parental traits + intermediacy for quantitative ones In practice: often a hybrid will also exhibit traits not present in either parent, transgressive 2. -
Jeffrey James Keeling Sul Ross State University Box C-64 Alpine, Texas 79832-0001, U.S.A
AN ANNOTATED VASCULAR FLORA AND FLORISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN HALF OF THE NATURE CONSERVANCY DAVIS MOUNTAINS PRESERVE, JEFF DAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, U.S.A. Jeffrey James Keeling Sul Ross State University Box C-64 Alpine, Texas 79832-0001, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT The Nature Conservancy Davis Mountains Preserve (DMP) is located 24.9 mi (40 km) northwest of Fort Davis, Texas, in the northeastern region of the Chihuahuan Desert and consists of some of the most complex topography of the Davis Mountains, including their summit, Mount Livermore, at 8378 ft (2554 m). The cool, temperate, “sky island” ecosystem caters to the requirements that are needed to accommo- date a wide range of unique diversity, endemism, and vegetation patterns, including desert grasslands and montane savannahs. The current study began in May of 2011 and aimed to catalogue the entire vascular flora of the 18,360 acres of Nature Conservancy property south of Highway 118 and directly surrounding Mount Livermore. Previous botanical investigations are presented, as well as biogeographic relation- ships of the flora. The numbers from herbaria searches and from the recent field collections combine to a total of 2,153 voucher specimens, representing 483 species and infraspecies, 288 genera, and 87 families. The best-represented families are Asteraceae (89 species, 18.4% of the total flora), Poaceae (76 species, 15.7% of the total flora), and Fabaceae (21 species, 4.3% of the total flora). The current study represents a 25.44% increase in vouchered specimens and a 9.7% increase in known species from the study area’s 18,360 acres and describes four en- demic and fourteen non-native species (four invasive) on the property. -
Angiospermas Nativas Documentadas En La Literatura Para El Estado De México, México
Acta Botanica Mexicana 124 Martínez-De La Cruz et al.: Angiospermas del Estado de México, México 10.21829/abm124.2018.1273 Artículo de investigación Angiospermas nativas documentadas en la literatura para el Estado de México, México Native angiosperms documented in the literature for the State of Mexico, Mexico Isabel Martínez-De La Cruz1 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-7906 José Luis Villaseñor2 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-8548 Luis Isaac Aguilera Gómez3 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1067-8029 Martín Rubí Arriaga4,5 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-5017 1Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Campus Universitario “El Cerrillo”, El Cerrillo Piedras Blancas, km 15.5 carretera Toluca-Ixtlahuaca, 50200 Toluca, Estado de México, México. 2Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Botánica, 04510 Cd. Mx., México. 3Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Universitario “El Cerrillo”, El Cerrillo Piedras Blancas, km 15.5 carretera Toluca-Ixtlahuaca, 50200 Toluca, Estado de México, México. 4Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados en Fitomejoramiento (CIEAF), Campus Universitario “El Cerrillo”, El Cerrillo Piedras Blancas, km 15.5 carretera Toluca-Ixtlahuaca, 50200 Toluca, Estado de México, México. 5Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen: Antecedentes y Objetivos: En 1979 se publicó por primera vez la riqueza de plantas vasculares en el Estado de México. La información allí presentada ha perdido actualidad debido al incremento de aportaciones florísticas. El objetivo de este trabajo es contribuir al conocimiento de la flora del Estado de México, a partir de la literatura florística-taxonómica disponible. -
57.2-3 8 Dolby Et Al Si1.Pdf
Figure S1. Maps showing sampled localities for genetic markers in all taxa (A: N = 85 taxa), and spatial overlap of Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) from haploid (i.e., mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA) genetic markers in all taxa (B: N = 72 taxa), reptiles (C: N = 28 taxa), mammals (D: N = 14 taxa), amphibians (E: N = 4 taxa), invertebrates (F: N = 17 taxa), birds (G: N = 7 taxa), and plants (H: N = 2 taxa). Figure S2. Maps showing sampled localities for genetic markers in all taxa (A: N = 85 taxa), and spatial overlap of Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) for diploid (i.e., nuclear) genetic markers in all taxa (B: N =20 taxa), reptiles (C: N = 4 taxa), mammals (D: N = 3 taxa), amphibians (E: N = 2 taxa), invertebrates (F: N = 4 taxa), birds (G: N = 2 taxa), and plants (H: N = 5 taxa). Figure S3. Map showing spatial overlap of Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) from haploid genetic markers in volant animals (A: N = 16 taxa) and non-volant animals (B: N = 54 taxa) Table S1. Studies describing the geographic distribution of Evolutionary Significant Units (ESUs) based on genetic criteria for haploid and diploid markers on the terrestrial biota from the Baja California peninsula. For each taxa (N = 85), we include ID, name, markers employed, total number of samples analyzed (N), and where applicable the size (in base pairs, bp) of the DNA fragment analyzed. For non-sequence data, the total sample size (N) and the number of loci analyzed are indicated. CB = cytochrome, CR= control region, A= allozymes, MS = microsatellites. Table S2. -
Universidad Nacional Autónoma De México Posgrado En Ciencias Biológicas Instituto De Biología Sistemática
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA SISTEMÁTICA “Relaciones filogenéticas del género Carminatia Moc. ex DC. (Eupatorieae- Compositae)” TESIS QUE PARA OPTAR POR EL GRADO DE: MAESTRO EN CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (SISTEMÁTICA) PRESENTA: OSCAR HINOJOSA ESPINOSA TUTOR PRINCIPAL DE TESIS: DR. JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR RÍOS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA, UNAM COMITÉ TUTOR: DRA. TERESA MARGARITA TERRAZAS SALGADO INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGÍA, UNAM DRA. SUSANA VALENCIA ÁVALOS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS, UNAM MÉXICO, D.F. MARZO, 2013 AGRADECIMIENTOS Al Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas de la UNAM por la oportunidad brindada para realizar mis estudios de Maestría en Ciencias Biológicas. Al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) por la beca otorgada número 250764, para la manutención de mis estudios de Maestría en Ciencias Biológicas. A mi Comité Tutor constituido por: Dr. José Luis Villaseñor Ríos (tutor principal). Dra. Teresa Margarita Terrazas Salgado. Dra. Susana Valencia Ávalos. AGRADECIMIENTOS PERSONALES Al Dr. José Luis Villaseñor Ríos por todo el apoyo que me ha brindado. Gracias al Dr. Villaseñor, pude ingresar al Instituto de Biología a realizar estudios de posgrado, además de poder salir a varios lugares increíbles a recolectar compuestas y conocer otros herbarios. Valoro con grandeza todos los consejos, comentarios y críticas que el Dr. Villaseñor me ha brindado. Igualmente, el Dr. Villaseñor dio todas las facilidades para realizar mis estudios y siempre estuvo atento y disponible para resolver cualquier situación. Agradezco la paciencia y tolerancia que el Dr. Villaseñor tuvo conmigo. Agradezco también lo que pude aprender de Taxonomía gracias a su clase del posgrado y al tiempo que he estado con él en el IB. -
Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This Is a Consolidated List Of
RWKiger 5 Jul 18 Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix "a"; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with "b". Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. -
Chromosome Counts of Compositae from the United States and Mexico
Amer. J. Bot. 64(6): 680-686. 1977. CHROMOSOME COUNTS OF COMPOSITAE FROM THE UNITED STATES AND MEXIC01 DONALD J. PINKAVA AND DAVID J. KEIL Department of Botany and Microbiology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85281 ABSTRACT Chromosome counts are reported for 126 taxa representing 122 species and 61 genera of Compositae. First reports include two genera, Stylocline (n == 14) and Chromolepis (n == 19), 17 species, two infraspecific taxa, and one interspecific hybrid. Five additional taxa have chro mosome numbers differing from previously published accounts. Carminatia is reinstated to generic status. THIS is the second in a series of studies document ports for the respective genera. Our counts for ing chromosome numbers of Compositae of the 17 species, two infraspecific taxa and one inter United States and Mexico (cf. Keil and Pinkava, specific hybrid are first reports. Five additional . 1976). Vouchered chromosome counts represent taxa have chromosome numbers differing from both hitherto unreported taxa and taxa for which previously published accounts. In the following counts have been published previously. The for discussion, commentary is restricted to those mer counts serve to increase the number of taxa cases for which it is necessary to add to the ma for which cytological data is available and can terial in Table 1 or to provide information regard provide insights into evolutionary relationships. ing their taxonomic or evolutionary significance. The latter counts provide information about varia tion in chromosome complements and broaden the DISCUSSION-VERNONIEAE-Vernonia X geor geographical sample of the various taxa. giana is a diploid hybrid between V. acaulis (Walt.) Gleason (n== 18) and V. -
Compositae En Atenango Del Río, Guerrero, México
Bol.Soc.Bot.Méx. 86: 71-73 (2010) NOTA BOTÁNICA entro de la fl ora fanerogámi- Dca mexicana, destaca la familia COMPOSITAE EN ATENANGO DEL RÍO, Compositae, debido a su gran diversi- dad de géneros y especies, el elevado GUERRERO, MÉXICO endemismo, así como la abundancia general de sus componentes en la ma- yoría de las regiones de México (Ca- brera-Rodríguez y Villaseñor, 1987; Rzedowski 1972, 1991a, 1991b; Tur- ÓSCAR HINOJOSA-ESPINOSA1 Y RAMIRO CRUZ-DURÁN ner, 1997; Turner y Nesom, 1998; Vi- llaseñor et al., 1998; Villaseñor, 1987, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Facultad de Ciencias, 1991, 1993, 2003). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 1Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] Compositae es una de las familias mejor conocidas de la fl ora mexicana desde el punto de vista taxonómico y fl orístico (Cabrera-Rodríguez y Villa- señor, 1987; Villaseñor, 1991), pues existen numerosos tratamientos taxo- nómicos sobre más de la mitad de los taxones mexicanos (Cabrera-Rodrí- guez y Villaseñor, 1987). No obstan- subhúmedo con lluvias en verano). La fueron depositados en FCME, con nu- te, son pocos los botánicos mexicanos vegetación que prevalece es el bos- merosos duplicados en MEXU (Hino- que conocen esta familia, pues la ma- que tropical caducifolio, con taxones josa, 2008). Las descripciones, claves yoría de los tratamientos taxonómicos representativos como Bursera ssp., de identifi cación y fotografías de los han sido realizados por investigado- Ceiba parvifolia Rose, Lysiloma mi- taxones pueden ser consultadas en Hi- res extranjeros (Cabrera-Rodríguez crophyllum Benth., Neobuxbaumia nojosa (2008). y Villaseñor, 1987). Por otra parte, mezcalaensis Bravo, Plumeria rubra Se encontraron 75 especies y 45 considerando sólo a esta familia, exis- L., Pachycereus weberi (J.M. -
Listado Florístico Del Cerro Quetzal (Polígono Iii) De La Reserva De La Biosfera El Triunfo, Chiapas, México
Botanical Sciences 90 (2): 113-142, 2012 FLORÍSTICA Y TAXONOMÍA LISTADO FLORÍSTICO DEL CERRO QUETZAL (POLÍGONO III) DE LA RESERVA DE LA BIOSFERA EL TRIUNFO, CHIAPAS, MÉXICO MIGUEL ÁNGEL PÉREZ-FARRERA1, 3, RUBÉN MARTÍNEZ-CAMILO1, NAYELY MARTÍNEZ-MELÉNDEZ1, OS- 1 2 CAR FARRERA-SARMIENTO Y SUSANA MAZA-VILLALOBOS 1Herbario Eizi Matuda (HEM), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas 2Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 3Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen: El Triunfo, Chiapas, México. Se integró una base de datos con 1,513 registros, incluye 140 familias, 432 géneros, 795 especies y polígonos I y II (751 y 791 especies, respectivamente) y mayor al cerro Cebú (polígono V) (502 especies). Los tipos de vegetación subcaducifolio y vegetación ruderal. El tipo de vegetación más importante por el número de especies y mejor recolectado es el Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) y una de SterculiaMonstera dubia) y otra de la familia Fabaceae (Albizia carbonaria). Palabras clave: Abstract: respectively) but higher than Mt. Cebú (Polygon V) (502 species). The vegetation communities determined in the Mt. Quetzal were: conifers forest, cloud forest, tropical rain forest, subdeciduous tropical forest, and ruderal vegetation. The vegetation type more important based on the number of species and the best recollected was the cloud forest. This checklist also included novel taxa: a new species of Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae) and a new species of Sterculia (Sterculiaceae) and the presence Monstera dubia Albizia carbonaria (Fabaceae) unrecorded for Chiapas. Key words: xisten varias estrategias para la preservación y conserva- biológica de un área determinada y es una de las mejores Eción biológica; sin embargo, la selección y pertinencia opciones para conocer la potencialidad de los recursos natu- para la aplicación de alguna de ellas, depende del entendi- rales que tiene una determinada región. -
Contributions from the United States National Herbarium
UPON A COLLECTION OF PLANTS MADE M MR. G.C. NEALLEY, IN THE J{EGION OF THE RIO GRANDE, IN TEXAS, FROM BRAZOS SANTIAGO TO EL PASO COUNTY. By John M. Coulter. Mr. G. C. Noalley was enframed by tho ])ivisio!i of Botany to make collectioiivs of plants during the seasons of 1887, 1888, and 1889, in the more unoxi)lored parts of Texas, chiefly in the counties bordering the llio Grande. It was hoped that many of the rarer plants of the Mex- ican Boundary Survey and other early collections would be re-discov- ered, that additional Mexican types would be found to be members of our flora, and that species new to science would be l)rought to light. How far these hopes have been realized is shown in tlje following re- l)ort. It is to be regretted that in many cases the stations are no more definitely given, but they are given with all the fullness that the field- notes will justify.' 1. Clematis crispa L. Near Brazos Santiajjo in April, and later at Balliiiger (liiiiUKjls county). 2. Clematis Diummondii Torr. & Gray. In jrreat abmulance alonj? tlio Rio (JiaiMio iH'iir Itoiiia (Starr county). 3. Clematis Pitcheri Torr. & Gray. Concho comity. 4. Aquilegia chiysautha Gray. Soutlnv«st«.'rn Texas. 5. Cocculus diveisifolius DC. (C. obloiiyi/oHus DC.) Southwestern Toxas. Two I'onijs of thifi species occur in Mr. Nealloy's collections ; one with ovate loaves, tlir ntbor with narrowly oblong leaves. 6. Castalia elegans Greene {Nymphwa elq/ans Hook.). Along the lower Rio Grande near Santa Maria (Cameron county), and apparently in considerable abun- dance. -
An Annotated List of VASCULAR PLANTS of CHIRICAHUA MOUNTAINS
An Annotated List of VASCULAR PLANTS of CHIRICAHUA MOUNTAINS Including Pedregosa Mountains, Swisshelm Mountains Chiricahua National Monument, and Fort Bowie National Historic Site Peter S. Bennett R. Roy Johnson Michael R. Kunzmann Special Report No. 12 October 1996 United States Geological Survey Biological Resources Division Cooperative Park Studies Unit School of Renewable Natural Resources 125 Biological Sciences East University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 Authors Peter S. Bennett Michael R. Kunzmann USGS Biological Resources Division USGS Biological Resources Division Cooperative Park Studies Unit Cooperative Park Studies Unit The University of Arizona The University of Arizona 125 Biological Sciences East 125 Biological Sciences East Tucson, Arizona 85721 Tucson, Arizona 85721 R. Roy Johnson 3755 Hunters Run Tucson, Arizona 85730 Unit Personnell William L. Halvorson, Unit Leader Joan Ford, Research Unit Assistant Peter S. Bennett, Research Ecologist Gloria J. Maender, Editorial Assistant Cecil R. Schwalbe, Research Ecologist Mary N. Greene, Secredary Michael R. Kunsmann, Ecologist Tod A. Gregoire, Word Processing Specialist Katherine L. Hiett, Biological Technician 520/670-6885 520/621-1174 FTS 520/670-6885 Reports in this series are produced in limited quantities. As long as the supply lasts, copies may be obtained from BRD-CPSU/UA, 125 Biological Sciences East, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. This report was printed on recycled paper. CONTENTS List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................