DOCSLIB.ORG

Lo-Res Map (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lo-Res Map (PDF) 1 24° 30 '0" W 12 4° 20 '0 "W 12 4° 10'0 "W 124°60'0"W 123°50'0"W 1 23° 40 '0" W 12 3° 30 '0 "W 41 °3 0'0" N Humboldt County DEL NORTE COUNTY 41°30'0"N k e e BLUEBLUE CREEK #3#3 FIREFIRE r C p u 3 r Fire History 16a 2 T 16 4 5 4 K 3 2 5 3 l 4 a 2 1 Nic m kow itz C reek 9 a 12 9 t e k 8 h 10 re 7 11 12 C 7 8 e 11 12 10 R Bl u 910 11 i v e h C r r o Fo rk Ah Pa ee 16 15 1 3N 03E N rt h k 14 16 12N 01E 18 17 18 17 12N 02E 13 16 15 14 1908 - 2001 15 14 13 13 21 reek 23 C 22 2021h 21 22 19 a 23 SISKIYOU COUNTY 24 1920 23 24 22 Cree P 24 h k h a A P P h r Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park a A Prairie Cree k Redwoo ds State Park i 28 r i 28 29 e 29 27 B 26 26 25 30 28 25 27 C e 26 r 30 a 27 e r e 25 C OOFF FF FFIRE IRE k COAST REDWO OD F IRE COAST REDW OO D FIRE re e k 33 34 32 33 34 33 34 35 32 35 31 35 36 36 k SERPEN TINE CAMP FIRE e 31 SERPENTIN E CAMP FIRE e k k r e e re 36 C C PECWANPECWAN CREEKCREEK FIFIRE RE e r f r 4 u f 6 5 4 6 C 3 p 1 u 1 5 1 r l 6 p 3 u 3 k 6 43 4 2 1 6 2 5 4 1 B 4 S e m 5 2 e 2 a r 5 2 3 C C 3 n Legend a w c 11 e 8 9 P 78 9 10 11 89 9 12 7 12 8 9 12 7 10 10 7 10 11 8 91011 11 10 8 Johnsons 12 7 12 N Sta ec wan C 96 te P re !( 41 °2 0'0" N Fire Perimeters H w e k y rk 1 o 15 18 16 15 13 6 t F 15 17 16 14 13 17 14 s 15 16 13 18 16 9 a 15 14 17 16 E 15 18 16 14 18 17 18 17 14 13 17 11N O4E 13 CAMP CREEK #2 FIRE A 11N 02E 11 N 05E CA M P C R EE K # 2 F I R E 11N 03 E 11N 06 E Date 11N 01E 20 2021 24 20 22 22 21 CAMPCAMP CREEK #1 FIRE 22 19 21 20 20 2324 24 20 24 19 19 22 21 22 23 19 21 23 23 21 19 41°20'0"N Before 1950 E 22 23 24 10 1 01 28 27 26 2928 29 25 30 29 27 26 25 28 27 26 30 30 29 25 30 29 28 30 28 27 25 27 1950 - 1969 28 C 27 26 25 26 29 k CRAWFORDCRAW FORD CREEKCREE K FIREFIRE k e e SALMONSALMON FIREFIRE r e k C 32 e e l l 33 e UUL LLA LATHO T HORN RNE E FFIRE IRE Orleans w r e32d r 34 34 35 e 31 34 35 36 31 32 333435 MINEMINE FIREFIRE 35 R o 33 35 32 33 36 31 p C 36 o d C 32 36 33 34 1970 - 1989 p k 33 e 32 36 31 a t e C 34 35 O a e MINER CREEK FIRE l r MINER CREEK FI RE 31 S Orick C 5 h 16 2 16 a 4 4 SLATE CREEK FIRE 5 3 tt 3 SLATE CREEK F IRE e 5 2 6 4 1 1990 - 2001 5 4 4 2 3 1 5 3 2 2 3 2 6 M 3 6 5 4 HHOPKINS OPKINS RIDRIDGE GE #10 FIFIRE RE CHENITCH E NI T CCH H FIREFI R E k e re BLUFF CREEK FIRE 9 10 BLUFF CREEK FIRE Fre shwater C 10 11 78 8 12 7 Unknown Date Lago on h 9 8 8 8 9 11 K 12 7 11 9 8 10 11 a 10 12 7 7 t la 9 11 12 9 10 12 c 10 11 12 e m BLUFFBLUF F CRECREEK E K WESTWE ST FIFIRE RE T a BOISE CREEK FIRE th BOISE CREEK FIRE Wildland Fire Rating 18 17 18 15 16 15 13 17 16 R 16 16 13 14 14 15 14 15 18 17 16 15 13 i 18 17 17 18 13 v 13 18 k 14 Stone 13 14 14 17 Cree 16 15 10N 01E 10N 02 E e 10 N 04E 10Nr 05 E Bois e 10 N 06E La goo n 10N 03 E r ve Extreme BURRELL PEAK FI RE Ri HOHOG G FFIRE IRE 24 BU RRELL PEAK FIRE 24 20 20 21 th 22 23 a 19 21 19 20 m 22 19 21 24 19 22 a 19 23 24 22 20 21 24 19 l 20 21 24 20 23 23 23 K 22 23 G.P. #6#6 FFIRE IRE 21 Humbol dt Lago ons State Park MARTIN FIRE 22 29 High 28 RedwoodRed woo d NNational at iona l PPark ark 30 30 27 26 26 25 25 27 29 29 28 29 28 30 28 25 27 26 Elk Cam p 26 30 30 28 27 26 30 28 27 27 26 25 29 25 HOPKINS CREEK F IRE Moderate HOPKINS CREEK FIRE 29 25 35 32 31 34 R 34 36 33 o 96 31 32 35 36 a !( 33 33 c 31 32 35 36 33 32 33 34 34 36 3132 34 35 h 34 36 31 32 35 36 31 REDCAP FIREFIRE Low C k 35 33 r e e e 1 e r 2 6 5 k G.L. SPEIER FIRE C 16 9 G.L. S P EI ER F I R E !( 6 3 3 1 l y 5 4 5 4 2 6 5 u 101 4 4 3 T 2 1 Nil k 3 6 01 1 e r e k 2 6 2 C e 1 ld re 6 5 4 1 Tom Mc Dona C Weitchpec 5 3 7 4 3 2 9 h 11 12 8 11 c 8 R 10 a 7 e 78 o 9 d County Boundary 9 10 R C 12 10 11 7 8 9 a 41 °1 0'0" N 12 k p e C 10 r SixSix RiversRivers NationalNational FFores orest t Big e e r 11 12 ek Lagoon C 7 9 8 SALMON SUSUMMIT MMIT FFIRE IRE 18 10 7 10 17 14 e 8 9 11 12 7 18 16 18 11 12 City Boundary 16 15 13 17 in 17 15 14 13 16 P Big La goon Park 15 !(96 14 13 B ll C re 09N 02E HHEALY EALY LLO OGG GGING ING COCO. FFIRE IRE u e k Big Lagoon 17 16 15 T 09N 01E 18 18 16 15 13 16 18 CHILDSCH I LD S FIREFI R E 09N 03 E r 14 13 17 18 17 i 14 41°10'0"N Public Lands 19 23 20 09N 04 E n R 14 13 20 21 22 24 09N 05 E e 24 19 19 21 09 N 0 6E d 22 i 15 20 21 t C 23 22 y a 24 23 p 23 k R ee 24 C r 19 20 r RED CAP FIREFI RE e C 21 22 i 24 MILEMI LE FIREFIR E e ri dg 2v3 19 e Public Land Survey Patrick's Point State Park B 19 20 21 22 k 27 e 23 20 21 22 25 30 29 28 26 29 24 23 24 27 30 29 25 28 27 r 28 27 30 26 N 26 25 or 26 th COYOTECO YO T E CREEKC R EE K FIFIRE R E F 25 30 29 M 34 o 27 26 i Patricks Point r 28 25 l Townships k 30 29 l 27 M 28 26 C k 25 30 35 a k r 28 26 e e e 29 36 ple C re 31 34 36 31 32 27 25 e e 31 32 32 33 35 34 r k k 34 35 e 33 C 33 36 ils Creek re v C e e te in Sections D o P 35 36 31 32 oy 33 C le k 34 35 5 itt 34 35 3631 36 L ee 32 33 3 r 33 3 2 1 1 C 31 32 34 35 36 6 4 2 6 4 e 543 2 i n 1 6 5 3 P Highways and Major Roads 2 08N 01 W A-LINEA- L I NE FFIRE I R E 6 2 a le C r 1 5 4 1 10 M p e 6 5 3 e 8 3 4 2 12 7 1 6 5 11 k 2 1 7 12 8 9 1011 9 Hoopa Valle y Indian Re serv ation 3 12 8 9 Ho opa Valle y Indian Res ervation 4 Interstate HWY 10 11 7 10 11 ek 12 Cr e 12 11 M Maple 7 8 9 k 1011 7 e 8 L 9 10 11 e 12 10 i r 7 14 13 n B 15 18 17 16 89 12 18 17 e e 14 13 16 C 13 ek US or State HWY C 08N 01 E a 14 r S o re 16 c 18 17 e c ti sh C re h h 15 t 15 e C 08 N 0 2E n 08N 0 3E 14 k r a e P 13 18 15 17 13 Trin id ad S ta te Beach 24 e 24 16 k 18 17 16 23 19 08N 04 E14 08N 05 E 14 13 16 15 HWY or Secondary Road 19 21 15 18 17 20 20 21 22 22 23 H oop a 23 24 20 22 08N 06 E 14 19 23 24 21 23 19 20 21 22 24 Trinidad 1920 Local Road 21 22 23 24 29 30 26 19 22 28 3029 20 21 27 L 28 27 28 27 26 25 23 26 25 30 it 25 24 29 tl L 19 e a R c r eek i v k 30 29 28 27 C 30 e s yl 30 k r 29 ee 26 Hydrography C p 28 r C 27 p 26 25 g 25 31 r u 30 27 32 34 e S Ta n 29 28 26 25 e a 33 35 32 33 34 g 33 34 32 36 k 35 an 35 36 31 T We stha ve n 31 36 h 31 is MEGRAM FIREFIRE 101 T Major River or Stream 32 33 34 35 01 33 32 6 34 3536 r 36 31 31 32 5 e d 33 34 35 36 31 4 v 3 1 a i 2 2 16 5 4 6 o R 5 3 3 2 R 16 4 ir le a Li ttle River State Bea ch Crannell t 6 Continuous Perennial i t B 1 L 5 4 3 2 4 41 °6 0'0" N DDOLLY OLLY VARDEN FIREFIRE 5 3 2 9 1 6 5 7 8 10 4 11 12 9 7 8 HOHOO OPA PA FFIRE IRE H 3 2 1 78 10 9 10 o 6 11 12 11 12 7 Continuous Intermittent 96 r !( s LUFFENHOLZLUF FE NH OLZ FFIRE IRE 89 10 e L 11 10 ni 11 7 to 16 18 17 15 14 12 C 18 16 13 17 16 re Subsurface 13 17 18 15 14 ek 07N 0 1E 14 13 41°60'0"N 15 18 15 789 16 12 07N 02 E 17 14 12 7 891011E re 07N 03 E a s up C ek s 23 os - t T 13 F 18 19 20 21 19 21 07N 0 4E 22 22 o 24 19 20 rk 21 22 23 16 15 20 24 23 24 H N 19 20 21 18 17 ors k o 22 14 13 1615 e Linto Cree13 r 23 18 17 th 07 N 0 5E 14 k Fi el db roo k F 0 7N 06E e o 28 e r 24 30 29 r k 27 27 k C 28 M 29 Cree 26 30 or 30 a 25 27 in 25 y 25 d M 26 19 20 21 24 a 28 THREETHR E E CREEKSC R EE K S FIREFI R E 22 23 24 26 29 30 s R 28 19 20 d i 29 26 v 27 21 22 n i e 23 r McKinleyvill e L 25 36 31 33 32 33 35 32 35 32 M 34 36 31 34 36 31 33 a d 34 35 36 30 RF: 1:125,000 29 9 29 28 27 26 25 R !( 31 25 30 29 i 32 33 28 27 26 v 34 e 35 Willow Creek r Ced 1 6 T ar 5 1 4 2 h 31 k k 4 3 2 3 C e 1 inch equals 1.97 miles 6 5 1 6 e 36 ee re r r Cr 5 4 e k36 C ill 3 2 1 C e 31 32 34 35 32 e 34 r 32 e a 35 M 6 re re 33 d 5 4 e C k Ce k 3 s 2 w ll o 1 i 6 7 8 10 12 9 12 11 12 7 W 11 7 10 9 5 4 8 9 8 9 3 20 0 10 11 12 4 !( 7 11 8910 Lu E 12 13 p t a 14 on s 18 29 9 17 !( 17 C t 7 06 N 0 1E 15 13 18 16 15 14 13 18 r ee F 8 16 k 18 o 16 299 r 9 17 14 !( k d Glendale 06 N 0 2E 15 13 15 W 14 a r 17 16 il 13 o e 06N 0 3E l h i v o 29 9 g 101 R w R !( 24 u C 23 l 01 d 06N 04 E o 19 20 22 r 18 l e 23 21 21 a 24 e S d 24 19 e 16 M 23 17 r i 20 k T h rk 23 19 20 21 Note: e e g 29 9 o 21 22 24 19 r v u !( i i 22 20 23 n S o F 22 R l 06 N 05E i t S h 24 y rt d l B lue Lake o R 26 a ie N i n Humboldt State University 28 M 25 30 19 v The Fire Perimeters data consists of CDF fires 300 acres and greater in size a 29 28 e D 27 26 27 20 c 25 30 Korbel 2625 21 r and USFS fires 10 acres and greater throughout California from 1950 to 2001.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNTY Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept
    FIRE DEPARTMENT COUNTY Adair County Tri Community Volunteer Fire Dept. Adair Bell Rural Fire Department Inc Adair Chance Community Fire Department Inc. Adair Christie Proctor Fire Association Adair Greasy Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Adair Hwy 100 West Fire Protection Adair Hwy 51 West Rural Fire District, Inc. Adair Mid County Rural Fire Dept. Inc. Adair Town of Stilwell for Stilwell Fire Department Adair Town of Watts for Watts Fire Department Adair Town of Westville for Westville Fire Department Adair City of Cherokee for Cherokee Fire Department Alfalfa Nescatunga Rural Fire Association Alfalfa Town of Aline for Aline Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Burlington for Burlington Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Byron for A&B Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Carmen for Carmen Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Goltry for Goltry Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Helena for Helena Fire Department Alfalfa Town of Jet for Jet Fire Department Alfalfa Bentley Volunteer Fire District Atoka City of Atoka for Atoka Fire Department Atoka Crystal Volunteer Fire Department Association Atoka Daisy Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. Atoka Farris Fire District Atoka Harmony Fire Department Atoka Hopewell Community Firefighters Association Atoka Lane Volunteer Fire Department Association Atoka Town of Caney for Caney Fire Department Atoka Town of Stringtown for Stringtown Fire Department Atoka Town of Tushka for Tushka Fire Department Atoka Wards Chapel Fire Department, Inc. Atoka Wardville Rural Volunteer Fire Dept. Atoka Wilson Community Rural Fire Association
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Annual Report
    2013 Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Annual Report What did the Kansas Fire Service do in 2013? Office of the State Fire Marshal Doug Jorgensen Fire Marshal 800 SW Jackson, Suite 104 Topeka, KS 66612 Phone: (785) 296-3401 www.ksfm.ks.gov Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Kansas fire departments are required under K.A.R 22-5-1 to submit a report for each incident where a response is made by that fire department, regardless of the call type or actions taken on the call. Also included in the requirements are reports for any fire service casualty, injury or death, that occurs while acting in an official role a call, responding to a call, drilling, at the station, etc. Firefighter injuries caused by equipment failures are heavily scrutinized to continue improving the safety of our Fire Service. Kansas does not have a central repository of fire reports. Instead, reports received at the Office of the State Fire Marshal are uploaded directly into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) housed at the National Fire Data Center (NFDC) at the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA). Each year, the USFA releases the most comprehensive reference on the nature and scope of the fire problem in the United States, Fire in the United States. The agencies and departments participating in the NFIRS make the publication possible. In addition to publications, the data can highlight current and emerging trends for more than fires. A variety of different public safety groups use the information to drive improvements through regulation, creating better equipment, training, education, product recalls, and funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire May 2020 CAL FIRE/Riverside Unit Strategic Fire Plan Page 1 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE .........................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................4 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................6 UNIT PREPAREDNESSAND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ............................... 12 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM .................................................................................................................... 14 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF VALUES AT RISK ............................................................ 17 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ................................................................................. 22 SECTION IV: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ........................................................................................ 24 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY................................................... 27 INFORMATIONANDEDUCATION ................................................................... 28 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 29 SECTION V: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT TACTICS DIVISION / BATTALION / PROGRAM PLANS .................................................. 41 APPENDIX A: HIGH PRIORITY PRE‐FIRE PROJECTS .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee County Fire Handbook Prepared by Kevin J
    Tennessee County Fire Handbook prepared by Kevin J. Lauer, Fire Management Consultant EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF STATEWIDE ANALYSIS CURRENT ASSESSMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITIES COUNTY EXECUTIVE/ MAYOR’S SURVEY FIRE DEPARTMENT SURVEY ISO RATINGS AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT COUNTY WATER SUPPLY PLANNING FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPARTMENT FUNDING FORMATION OF A COUNTYWIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION TRAINING TENNESSEE COUNTY FIRE HANDBOOK Kevin J. Lauer Fire Management Consultant Dedication The Tennessee County Fire Handbook is dedicated in both new and existing buildings. Over time the to Dwight and Gloria Kessel. Dwight Kessel gave fire bureau expanded to provide public education 31 years of dedicated service to the people of and fire/arson investigation as well as code Knox County as a Knoxville City Council member, enforcement. This approach was unprecedented at Knox County Clerk and County Executive. During the time on a county level and remains a model his tenure as County Executive, Kessel oversaw that most counties in the state should study to tremendous growth in the county’s population improve life safety and property loss reduction. and services provided. The county was handed several duplicate governmental services from Even after Kessel’s tenure in office, he has the city such as schools, jails, libraries and continued to improve county government across indigent care (which became a model that other the state. The Kessel’s generous endowment communities across the nation studied and used to the University of Tennessee was earmarked to improve their delivery of indigent care). All for special projects that the County Technical were successfully absorbed into the realm of Assistance Service (CTAS) would not normally county services.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo - Santa Cruz Cloverdale VMP - 2010 6/15/2011 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES................................................. 8 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM ........................................................................................................... 12 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF ASSETS AT RISK ................................................................................ 15 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ........................................................................................................ 17 SECTION IV: PRE FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ................................................................................................................. 18 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY ............................................................... 19 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION .................................................................................. 22 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Fire Review
    Reading Fire Review Smoke rises north of Reading Peak on Sunday, August 4, 2012—one week after lightning ignites the Reading Fire. Left and middle Reading Fire suppression photos taken on August 16. Photo on right of firefighters gridding for spots is from August 15. Lassen Volcanic National Park December 18, 2012 Reading Fire Review • Lassen Volcanic National Park 1 The Reading Fire as seen from Mt. Harkness on August 6. Contents Executive Summary…………………………………..… 3 1. Introduction………………………………………….………………..……… 6 2. Background – Lassen Volcanic National Park Fire History…………...... 7 3. Summary – A Learning-Focused Review of this Incident……………..... 10 4. Reading Fire Chronology………………………….………………..……… 13 5. Fire Behavior Summary…………………………..…………………..……. 20 6. Key Factors and Lessons Learned by the Participants….………...…… 29 7. Key Factors and Lessons Learned by the Review Team….….…...…… 34 8. Recommendations……………………………………….…………………. 38 9. Commendations……………….....……………………….………………… 39 10. Review Team Members………….……………………………......…….…. 40 11. Appendices Appendix A – Reading Fire Compliance with Wildland Fire Management Policy……..……………....... 41 Appendix B – Review Team Delegation of Authority…………..…….... 43 Appendix C – Reading Fire Comprehensive Chronology…………….... 44 Appendix D – The Lassen Volcanic National Park Pocket Card…...….. 51 Appendix E – General Exhibited Fire Behavior Based on Live Fuel Moisture Values…….……………….. 52 Appendix F – Manzanita RAWS Wind Graph………………….…….….. 53 Cover page photo credits: Bottom left photo taken by Kim Lemke. All other photos provided by Lassen Volcanic National Park. Reading Fire Review • Lassen Volcanic National Park 2 Reading Fire Review Executive Summary On July 23, 2012, a lightning strike started the Reading Fire in the interior of Lassen Volcanic National Park. The fire, located at approximately 7,000 feet in elevation, was located in red fir with areas of rock and limited ground fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Element
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6: Safety Element 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND CONTENT ...................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................. 3 Other General Plan Elements .................................................................................................................... 3 Area Plans .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................... 3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ....................................................................... 4 HAZARD REDUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ISSUES AND POLICIES ............................................................................................................................ 6 CODE CONFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • THE ECONOMIC IMPACT of 2016 LOMA FIRE the Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire
    THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF 2016 LOMA FIRE The Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire AUTHORS Zachary Christin, Johnny Mojica, Ken Cousins, and Matt Chadsey of Earth Economics. RECOMMENDED CITATION Christin, Z., Mojica, J., Cousins, K., Chadsey M. 2017. The Economic Impact of the 2016 Loma Fire. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is funded by the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority This document is owed to the guidance and review of Andrea Mackenzie, Marc Landgraf, and Derek Neumann of the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, as well as Earth Economics volunteer Tehva Kastel Riggan. Edit review by Jessica Hanson and cover page design by Sage McElroy, both of Earth Economics. We would also like to thank Earth Economics’ Board of Directors for their continued guidance and support: Alex Bernhardt, David Cosman, Elizabeth Hendrix, Greg Forge, Ingrid Rasch, Molly Seaverns, and Sherry Richardson. 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction: Natural Capital and California Wildfires in Santa Clara County .................... 6 2. What is Natural Capital ..................................................................................................... 8 3. Study Area and the Loma Fire Overview ......................................................................... 11 3.1. Geography and Major Features .............................................................................................. 11 3.2. Population
    [Show full text]
  • Cascade Complex Accident Prevention Analysis Report Table of Contents
    Intermountain Region November 9, 2007 CASCADE COMPLEX ACCIDENT PREVENTION ANALYSIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 PROLOGUE 4 INTRODUCTION 6 REVIEW OBJECTIVES 8 INFORMATION SOURCES AND PROCESSES 8 SETTING THE STAGE 9 THE STORY 24 EPILOGUE 36 LESSONS LEARNED BY TH E PEERS 43 LESSONS LEARNED ANALYSIS 48 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATOINS 56 APPENDIX A Chronology of Events 57 APPENDIX B Fire Behavior Specials Report 61 APPENDIX C A Human Factors Analysis of the Cascade Complex 87 APPENDIX D Health and Safety Analysis 103 APPENDIX D-1 Geomatrix Report 108 APPENDIX E Cascade Complex Accident Prevention Analysis Team Members 119 Cascade Complex - Accident Prevention Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Three events occurring on the Cascade Complex during August 12-14, 2007 are the subject of this report. These events are as follows: • Entrapment of a fire support truck driver and passenger on the Warm Lake Road; • Decision by the incident management team (IMT) to stay at the incident command post (ICP) location as the fire burned around the ICP; • Decision by the IMT to remain at the ICP location during the smoke-filled days following the fire burning around the camp. This report tells the story from the perspective of the review team and examines the social and organizational causes that led to the decisions and their outcomes. Since the review included an entrapment incident, the Forest Service Washington Office delegated authority for the review to the Intermountain Regional Forester. The Regional Forester identified a review team and asked them to follow the Accident Prevention Analysis process while meeting the following objectives: • Enable the reader of your report to understand the situation, the decisions that were made, and why they were made; • With the input of those involved and the expertise of your team, articulate the organizational and cultural factors that led to unintended outcomes; and • Based on your analysis of these events, recommend actions that you believe will enhance the safety and reliability of our organization in the future.
    [Show full text]