University of UKnowledge

Kentucky Geological Survey Information Circular Kentucky Geological Survey

1996 The iddM le and Upper Ordovician Bioclastic Carbonate ("Trenton") Play in the Appalachian Basin Brandon C. Nuttall University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u.

Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kgs_ic Part of the Geology Commons

Repository Citation Nuttall, Brandon C., "The iddM le and Upper Ordovician Bioclastic Carbonate ("Trenton") Play in the Appalachian Basin" (1996). Kentucky Geological Survey Information Circular. 59. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kgs_ic/59

This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Geological Survey at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Geological Survey Information Circular by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0075·5583 KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director UNIVERSITY OF KEN TUCKY

- The Middle and Upper Ordovician Bioclastic Carbonate ("Trenton"~P~ ay . " ~ in the Appalachian Basin \ ?>- / ./

Information Circular 55 Series XI, 1996 https://doi.org/10.13023/kgs.ic55.11 KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON SERIES XI, 1996 Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director

THE MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE ("TRENTON") PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Brandon C. Nuttall

INFORMATION CIRCULAR 55 ISSN 0075-5583 https://doi.org/10.13023/kgs.ic55.11 I UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY William A. Briscoe III, Publication Sales Charles T. Wethington,Jr., President Supervisor Fitzgerald B. Bramwell, Vice President for Roger S. Banks, Account Clerk V Research and Graduate Studies Eugenia E. Kelley, Staff Assistant V Jack Supplee, Director, Administrative Affairs, Luanne Davis, Staff Assistant IV Research and Graduate Studies Theola L. Evans, Staff Assistant IV KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Computer and Laboratory Services Section:· ADVISORY BOARD Steven J. Cordiviola, Head Hugh B. Gabbard, Chairman, Richmond Richard E. Sergeant, Geologist V William W. Bawdy, Fort Thomas Joseph B. Dixon, Systems Programmer Steve Cawood, Pineville James M. McElhone,'Senior Systems Analyst Larry R. Finley, Henderson Programmer Kenneth Gibson, Madisonville Henry E. Francis, Associate Scientist Ron D. Gilkerson, Lexington Karen Cisler, Senior Research Analyst Wallace W. Hagan, Lexington Janet M. Royer, Senior Research Analyst Phil M. Miles, Lexington Steven R Mock, Research Analyst W.A. Mossbarger, Lexington Alice T. Schelling, Research Analyst Henry A. Spalding, Hazard Mark F. Thompson, Research Analyst Jacqueline Swigart, Louisville Cherie A. Gough, Principal Laboratory David A. Zegeer, Lexington Technician Ralph N. Thomas, Emeritus Member, Owensboro Mary C. Koewler, Senior Laboratory Technician George H. Warren, Jr., Emeritus Member, GEOLOGICAL DIVISION Owensboro Coal and Minerals Section: KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Donald R. Chesnut, Jr., Head Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director Garland R. Dever, Jr., Geologist VII John D. Kiefer, Assistant State Geologist for Cortland F. Eble, Geologist V Administration Gerald A. Weisenfluh, Geologist V James C. Cobb, Assistant State Geologist for David A. Williams, Geologist V, Henderson Research office ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION Stephen F. Greb, Geologist IV Personnel and Finance Section: Robert E. Andrews, Geologist II James L. Hamilton, Administrative Staff Officer Ernest E. Thacker, Geologist I Il Geologic Mapping and Hydrocarbon Resources Jackie Perrelli, Administrative Staff Officer Section: Clerical Section: James A. Drahovzal, Head Jody L. Fox, Staff Assistant VII Warren H. Anderson, Geologist V Kimberly B. Stroth, Staff Assistant VI David C. Harris, Geologist IV Juanita G. Smith, Staff Assistant V, Henderson Brandon C. Nuttall, Geologist IV Office Lance G. Morris, Geologist II Publications Section: Thomas N. Sparks, Geologist I Carol L. Ruthven, Geologic Editor V Anna E. Watson, Geologist I Margaret Luther Smath, Geologic Editor III Water Resources Section: Terry D. Hounshell, Chief Cartographic James S. Dinger, Head Illustrator Daniel I. Carey, Hydrologist V Michael L. Murphy, Principal Drafting James C. Currens, Geologist V Technician Gary K. Felton, Geologist IV Gwenda K Rulo, Drafting Technician David R. Wunsch, Geologist IV Shirley D. Dawson, Staff Assitant V Alex W. Fogle, Hydrologist III Well Sample and Core Repository: Philip G. Conrad, Geologist III Patrick J. Gooding, Geologist IV Dwayne M. Keagy, Geologist II Robert R. Daniel, Laboratory Technician B C. Douglas R. Graham, Geological Technician Office of Geologic Information: Timothy D. Montowski, Geological Technician Bart Davidson, Geologist IV, Manager Gregory L. Secrist, Geological Technician. Richard A. Smath, Geologist III, ESIC Steven E. Webb, Geological Technician Coordinator Kathleen J. O'Leary, Program Coordinator Kevin}. Wente, Geological Technician Wendy S. Romain, Program Coordinator CONTENTS Page Abstract . .. 1 Definition .. 1 Location . .. 1 Production History . . . 2 Stratigraphy . . . 3 Structure . .. 7 Reservoir ...... 7 Key Field ...... 8 Granville Consolidated Pool, Clinton Com1ty, Kentucky ...... 8 Resources and Reserves ...... 9 Future Trends ...... 12 Acknowledgments . 13 References Cited 13 Appendix.A ..... 15 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page l. Location of the Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play within the Appalachian Basin ...... , . 2 2. Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone pools of eastern Kentucky producing from bioclastic carbonate bar fades ...... 3 3. Generalized stratigraphy of the Upper Ordovician in the Appalachian Basin . 4 4. Generalized depositional model ...... 5 5. Upper Ordovician bioclast:i.c carbonate (Trenton) type log . . . . . 6 6. Facies·distribution of central and northern Appalachian Basin area during late Cincinnati.an time ...... 7 7. Fades distribution of eastern North America during Shermanian (Lexington/ Trenton) time . . . . . 8 8. Structure on top of the Devonian Chattanooga Shale for part of Clinton County .. 9 9. lsopach map of th.e First Granville zone of the Lexington limestone in south.- central Kentucky ...... 10 10. North-south structural cross section across part of Clinton County showing the distribution of Granville zone (diagonal lines) and hydrocarbon production 11 TABLE Table Page 1. Summary of undiscovered recoverable resource calculations for Ordovician bioclastic carbonate play ...... 12 THE MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE ("TRENTON") PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Brandon C. Nuttall

ABSTRACT The bioclastic carbonate play in the Appalachian Basin (referred to by drillers as the "Trenton") includes both gas and oil produced from Middle and Upper Ordovician stratigraphic and combina­ tion traps in linear reservoirs often mistaken for reefs. vVhi.le production from this play is currently reported from nine fields in south-central and eastern Kentucky and five fields in , potential reservoir rocks are present throughout most of the Appalachian Basin from New York to . Along the western flank of the Appalachian Basin, in the Blue Grass Region of central Kentucky, Middle and Upper Ordovician strata crop out. In the subsurface of south-central Kentucky and eastward into the Appalachian Basin, drillers informally refer to "Trenton," "SU!Ulybrook," "Leipers," "Granville," "Modoc," and "Anderson" pay zones. The mixed carbonates and shales of the Lexington Limestone through the Drakes Formation of Kentucky consist of well-cemented bioclastic grainstones and mud.stones separated by relatively trun calcareous shales deposited in shallow platform, ramp, and peritidal settings. In areas of shoaling, reservoirs developed as discon­ tinuous coquinoid lag deposits that we~ winnowed from carbonate muds by wave and tidal activity and accwnulated as discrete offshore bars, tidal bars, and channel fills. In addition, dolomitized limestone reservoirs have developed along faults and fractures associated with recurrent movement of deep-seated basement faults. Structure mapping on the base of the overlying Devonian shale and the underlying Pencil Cave bentonite indicates the bars and channel fills may be spatially associated with basement structures. The Granville Consolidated Pool in Clinton Connty, Ky., is typical of fields in this play where production is associated with multiple stacked sequences of Offshore bars. An estimated 50 to 100 million cubic feet (M:Mcf) of gas per year is known to be produced from this field, not accounting for production from an unknown number of domestic supply wells. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate the nndiscovered recoverable resource for this play to be 127billion cubic feet (bcf) of natural gas. These reservoirs will probably not be an important primary target for future drilling outside of southern and eastern Kentucky, however, because the reservoirs are relatively deep throughout much of the basin and are subtle stratigraphic features that will be difficult to detect using seismic or remote-sensing methods. As exploration and development continues for Lower Ordovician and Upper Cambrian reservoirs, these bioclastic carbonate bars will merit further evaluation.

DEFINITION developed in linear dolomitized zones (Black, 1986). Middle and Upper Ordovician carbonates of Shermanian A play consists of geologically similar prospects (late Champlainian) and Cincinnati.an age are present that share the same source, reservoir, and trap con­ throughout the subsurface of the Appalachian Basin. trols, as well as conunon elements of risk. A play's Production from this play is currently reported from nine name is based on its geologic age, formation name, fields in eastern Kentucky and five fields in central New reservoir facies, or trap type. York (Fig. l}. Probable productive limits of the play are shown on Figure 1 and are based on the distribution of argillaceous and clean carbonate fades of Shermanian LOCATION age shown in Keith (1988). The estimated total potential The Middle and Upper Ordovician bioclastic car­ area of the play is 72.7 million acres. Within this area, bonate ("Trenton") play includes both gas and oil there are 23.7 million acres, primarily in Kentucky, where produced from stratigraphic and combination traps clean carbonates of Cincinnatian age are present in addi­ formed by Ordovician bioclastic carbonate bars (Sulli­ tion to the Shermanian facies. In addition, this play ex- van and Pryor, 1988) and from secondary porosity 2 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

SO O SO 100 MJta I I l 111111 I t t I I SO O SO 100 Kiomtitira

Figure 1. Location of the Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play within the Appalachian Basin, showing existing pools and the distribution of shallow-shelf, clean carbonate facies. tends across the Cumberland Saddle in southern Ken­ in 1861 with the drilling of the Old Matilda Gabbard well tucky to the eastern flank of the Illinois Basin. Appen­ to a depth of 264 feet. This well encountered an unnamed dix A gives basic data for fields included in this play. pay near the base of the Cincinnatian Series (Jillson, 1946). Its producing zone was later named "Granville" (Fig. 3) when the Big Rock Oil Company completed several suc­ PRODUCTION HISTORY cessful wells on the Granville Williams lease in Clinton In 1829, oil was discovered in Upper Ordovician County (Diamond, 1943). Drilling also began in New rocks of Kentucky with the drilling of the Great Ameri­ York in the late 1800's in response to reports of the can well on the Stockton lease in Cumberland County. discovery of oil in the Trenton Limestone near Lima, By the 1860's, several companies had been formed to (Art Van Tyne, oral commun., 1994"); gas was dis­ explore southern Kentucky for oil and brines. This covered in the Trenton around the southwestern flank of activity spread eastward across the Cincinnati Arch the Adirondack Mountains east of Lake (Fig. 1). onto the flanks and core of the Appalachian Basin. The Heck (1948) reported that this gas is produced from earliest drilling activity in the bioclastic carbonates for dark-gray limestones interbedded with thin beds of black which a record exists is summarized by Diamond or dark-gray shale. Upper Ordovician shale and Middle (1943) and Jillson (1946). The Granville Consolidated Ordovician Trenton Limestone have been penetrated by Pqol, in Clinton County, Ky. (Fig. 2), was discovered drilling in Ohio and West Virginia. Carter and others STRATIGRAPHY 3

Figure 2. Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone pools of eastern Kentucky producing from bioclastic carbonate bar facies.

(1988) and Smosna (1985) described the Trenton car­ STRATIGRAPHY bonate ramp and shelf environments of northwestern West Virginia and southeastern Ohio, although oil and Middle and Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonates gas production from these units is generally attributed are recognized in the Trenton Group (Limestone) of New to fractured dolomitized limestone reservoirs, as in the York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and West Virginia and Harlem Field (Maslowski, 1986; Baranoski, in press). the Lexington Limestone of Kentucky and southern Cumulative production data for this play are gen­ Ohio. Biodastic carbonate bars are also present in various erally not available. Sparse data available (New York formations within the Cincinnati.an Series in Kentucky Division of Mineral Resources, 1987; Van Tyne, oral and southern Ohio. Figure 3 is a generalized correlation commun., 1994) indicate more than 2 bcf of gas have chart modified from Harper (1979), Patchen and others been produced from the Pulaski and Sandy Creek (1985a-b), Shaver (1985), and Keith (1988) that shows the Fields of New York. Most of the gas wells.producing variations in Middle and Upper Ordovician nomencla­ from Middle and Upper Ordovician strata in Ken­ ture from Tennessee to New York. Commonly, the oil and tucky are completed for single residential or agricul­ gas producing zones in these strata are very local in tural domestic gas, for which no production data exist. extent and thus are assigned informal drillers' names like Granville. In general, the Middle and Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate sequence is disconformably under­ lain by massive Blackriveran-age carbonates and uncon­ formably overlain by Upper Ordovician or Lower ~ Chronostratigraphic Units Central and Nor1h Central Eastern West Virginia Global American Eastern Pennsylvania New York Tennessee Tennessee Eastern Ohio 6== Kentucky c Sl,5t~m/ Sta go Series Staga r enes m c )> C1I z -0 Junllla c c j Form11lon 0 Buff FO .t::. ~ 0 I= Sequatctlle .. Oswego 0 "' Sandstone 0 ~ < c Formation Grant ~ :IJ a: z Lake :, z ~ Limestone c 0 's; 0 0 ti) Lorraine Group a: z >, Fairview/ < w 0 C1I Leiper a Lelpers Q Cl. ~ Forrnallon Formation ~ .!! Cl. .,,I J .,,2 )> ::> I!' l0 z Inman Clays Ferry u. U6ca 1a Formation Formation m ·c Formation Kope E' § a, 0 'O i J i ta: (') w e j C1thys ::... Forrnallon ~ c (/) ·cns re ::1 ns (Modoc) ~ (') E (Gra.nv,ue. Trenton) (') a, Ubca Mies )> .t::. t ~ Shale Formation en Bigt,y-CIMOn :IJ Umtslone !i m z c .. Coburn 0 < 1a ns !j ti:!~?:.. Formallon Trenlon z 0 ·g z '6 Group )> < ai I Trenton > 'O .::,! -I 0 ~ z Ltmettone Salona FormeUon m 0 C1I ~ (Sunnyt>rook) a: (.) i: ~=~ ,, ~ I ,-I r 0 Cl. g, )> ::!: c (Anderson) .. w < .!11 !j -< .J J: 'O - & i;; 0 c Caners I ,, z 0 C1I (Lower Sunnybrool<) ~ 0 Lmestone J I :J ~ -I 32 I!' ?l ~ 8 ii ~ :, :I: a: fl ~ ! m j I!' ,,)> • c Moccasin Baya () ~ ns Bleck ~§ ~ I Slones River Formation Formation 1§ Black )> o ·c: High Bridge River River C1I GI Group Group Group ~, Group ai -~ Whitten ~ Limestone iJ Ji ! t, (') :I: j; z Figure 3. Generalized stratigraphy of the Upper Ordovician in the Appalachian Basin showing regional equivalents and correlations. Modified from m Patchen and others (1985a- b), Shaver (1985), and Keith (1988). Drillers' terms shown in parentheses. )> z~ STRATIGRAPHY 5

Silurian elastic sequences. Facies changes and deposi­ carbonate shelf facies that characterize parts of the Mid­ tional environments of the Middle and Upper Ordovi­ dle and Upper Ordovician sequence in the play area. A cian sequence in Kentucky are summarized by type log for part of the Middle and Upper Ordovician of Freeman (1953), Cressman (1973), Cressman and No­ Kentucky (Fig. 5) shows the Granville in a representative ger (1976), and Weir and others (1984) and regional stratigraphic position for reservoirs in this play. changes are summarized by Keith (1988). The Cincinnati.an Series in Kentucky and southern A broad, relatively shallow carbonate shelf existed Ohio consists of interbedded carbonate and elastic li­ throughout most of the Appalachian Basin at the close thologies of the Fairview, Leipers, Ashlock, Drakes, of Blackriverian time. This carbonate shelf continued Grant Lake, and Bull Fork formations that often contain into Champlainian and early Cincinnati.an time, but the bioclastic carbonates associated with this play. Weir received periodic influxes of shales, siltstones, and and others (1984) summarized the stratigraphy, facies, sandstones from the northeast (Fig. 3). The elastics depositional environments, and paleogeography of the interrupted carbonate deposition and resulted in argil­ Cincinnati.an Series. Figure 6, a generalized facies map of laceous carbonates and alternating carbonates and Cincinnati.an time, shows the distribution of carbonate shales over much of the western and southern extent and elastic rocks for the eastern . The lime­ of the platform. These mixed carbonates and shales stone units represent deposition on a broad, mostly open­ typically consist of well-cemented bioclastic grain­ marine, shallow to moderate-depth carbonate shelf with stones and carbonate mudstones separated by rela­ local intertidal and supratidal flats. Clastic sediment in­ tively thin calcareous shales that developed in flux from deltaic and alluvial plains to the northeast shallow-platform and peritidal settings. In high-en­ modified and sometimes interrupted carbonate deposi­ ergy, shallow shelf environments such as shoals and tion. Discontinuous deposits of medium- to coarse­ beaches, discontinuous coquinoid lag deposits were grained calcarenites, often characterized by low-angle winnowed from carbonate muds by wave and tidal crossbedding (as in lithofacies H of Weir and others, activity and accumulated as discrete offshore bars, 1984), occur throughout the Cincinnatian section; exam­ tidal bars, and channel fills (Sullivan and Pryor, 1988). ples include the Leipers Formation of southern Kentucky A generalized depositional model (Fig. 4) based on and Tennessee and the Grant Lake and Drakes Forma­ studies by Ginsburg (1975), Wilson (1975), and Walker tions of northern and northeastern Kentucky. and James (1992) shows the distribution of a variety of

Figure 4. Generalized depositional model, showing a carbonate platform and peritidal depositional environments (after Walker and James, 1992, p. 305.) 6 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Measured for the Granville, a producing zone in Depth the Lexington Limestone (Wilson and (feet)------, Sutton, 1973). Gamma Density Formation, Unit, or Drillers' Term The Lexington Limestone is a het­ 200 2.0 3.0 erogeneous lithologic sequence of dominantly bioclastic, fossiliferous, 400 tabular, gray limestones commonly in­ terbedded with shale that exhibit Leipers crossbeds, flow rolls, and other cur­ Formation rent-related and tidally influenced fea­ tures (Black and others, 1965). It is 500 correlative with the Trenton Lime­ stone and Trenton Group of Tennes­ Garrard see, West Virginia, Ohio, Siltstone Pennsylvania, and New York. The 600 Clays Ferry Lexington Limestone is often referred Formation to by drillers as the Trenton or Sunny­ Lexington brook. Pay zones are informally re­ Limestone ferred to as Granville, Modoc, Anderson, and Lower Sunnybrook. Stacked occurrences of the bioclastic lithology in the Lexington Limestone are often the First or Second Granville. Cressman (1973) summarized the stra­ 800 tigraphy of the Lexington Limestone and described several facies within the Lexington Limestone Lexington Limestone characterized in part by calcarenites and bioclastic co­ 900 quinas. Intertidal calcarenites in the Lexington Limestone with prominent crossbedding are discussed by Hrabar and others (1971). Figure 7 shows the Millbrig K-bentonite generalized facies distribution for the Shermanian Series in the eastern Deicke United States, the time when the upper K-bentonite part of the Lexington Limestone was deposited. Areas of shoaling indicated High Bridge by clean carbonate rocks are shown in Group south-central, southeastern, and northern Kentucky (Fig. 7). The Lex­ ington Limestone disconformably EXPLANATION overlies the High Bridge Group and is V/////A Pay zone exposed throughout much of the cen­ tral Blue Grass Region of Kentucky. Figure 5. Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) type log. The High Bridge Group in Ken- The Clays Ferry Limestone of northern Kentucky tucky, consisting mainly of massive limestone and dolo­ and adjoining Ohio conformably overlies and inter­ mite, underlies the bioclastic carbonates of the play. A tongues with the Lexington Limestone and consists of lithographic limestone developed at the.top of the High interbedded thin shales, limestones, and siltstones Bridge Group marks the close of the Middle Ordovician (Weir and Greene, 1965). It grades upward into the Blackriveran Stage in Kentucky. As described by Cress­ Garrard Siltstone. The Clays Ferry Limestone and Gar­ man and Nager (1976), the finely laminated micrite and rard Siltstone units are not part of the bioclastic car­ dolomite with mud cracks and birdseye calcite in the bonate play, but the Garrard Siltstone may be High Bridge Group are indicative of dominantly interti­ productive and has been mistaken in the subsurface dal and supratidal environments. The Millbrig (Mud Cave) and Deicke (Pencil Cave) bentonites, near the top STRUCTURE 7

STRUCTURE Subtle geologic structures of the west­ ern margin of the Appalachian Basin and the Cumberland Saddle of central Ken­ tucky have an important role in the loca­ tion of the fields of this play. Many of the fields are associated with nosing and flex­ ures on structure-contour maps of the Or­ Land dovician Pencil Cave bentonite and the top of the Devonian Chattanooga Shale (Fig. 8). Diamond (1943) noted produc­ tion along a north-south s~cture, the Ill- ~~~ij;~~~r/r----1n200s Will Anticline, in Clinton County, Ky. (a <-->.--.-( part of which is shown on Figure 8). More- over, Jillson (1946) showed that 12 oil or gas pools productive from the Granville Land or shallower bioclastic carbonate reser­ voirs are aligned along this structure. Jill­ son (1946, p. 23) stated that the rocks of Clinton County dip generally southeast 0 250 500 750 Kilometers and northwest and II constitute a ... mono­ cline ... [that] is locally flexed." Figure 8 0 500 Miles 250 shows the structure on the top of the Chat­ tanooga Shale in Clinton County, and the alignment of the Granville Consolidated D Sandstone, siltstone, and shale Shale and siltstone ~=== :::] Field along positive structural features (Thomas and others, 1950). Many of these § Dolomite, shale, and limestone Shale and limestone subtle structural features are not apparent / on regional maps (Potter, 1978). Alternatively, Black (1986) has pro­ ~ Limestone and shale posed that some of the oil and gas traps in Kentucky could be expected to occur in Figure 6. Facies distribution of central and northern Appalachian Basin narrow, linear, dolomitized zones along area during Late Cincinnatian time (Weir and others, 1984). normal and strike-slip faults associated of the High Bridge Group (Fig. 5), have been identified with interpreted basement faults in the and correlated from the Mississippi Valley to the Ap­ region. He suggested the Albion-Scipio trend in Michi­ palachians (Huff and Kolata, 1990) and are utilized as gan as a model for these fault-related dolomitized reser­ chronostratigraphic marker beds during drilling and voirs, and demonstrated the occurrence of linear oil and for subsurface mapping. When nuclear logs are avail­ gas fields along the flanks of aeromagnetic highs in Ken­ able and used for correlation, the Millbrig bentonite is tucky. He concluded that the dolomitized traps occur as assumed to be the top of the High Bridge Group. grabens or half-grabens, and that traps probably occur in Trenton Limestone samples from a well drilled in other parts of eastern Kentucky (see Baranoski, in press). the Sandy Creek Field, northwestern Oswego County, According to Van Tyne (oral commun., 1995) the rela­ N.Y., indicate that some of the main gas-producing tionship of structure to Trenton production in New York zones in the area are highly fossiliferous or II shelly" has not been investigated. Some production is believed limestone in the otherwise massive Trenton Limestone to be related to fracturing caused by various post-depo­ (Art Van Tyne, oral commun., 1994). The gas in the sitional tectonics. The Trenton fields of New York associ­ Trenton Limestone fields of New York is trapped in ated with this play are bioclastic accumulations with little interskeletal porosity of the bioclastic limestones and or no structural components controlling the reservoirs. sealed by the surrounding impermeable limestone. Van Tyne (oral commun., 1994) suggested that there may have been an arc of shoaling in the onlapping RESERVOIR Trenton Limestone around the southern flank of the Kentucky statutes require production data, currently Adirondacks, where biostromal or coquinitic beds reported to the Kentucky Revenue Cabinet, to be held were deposited. confidential. Therefore, reservoir data for this play were 8 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

average completion interval is 15 to 20 feet. According to Jillson (1946, p. 30), the "thick­ ness of oil saturation ranges from 5 to 25 feet; usually 7 to 15 feet. The oil in the Granville is accompanied by gas, frequently in consider­ able volume." In the early history of oil and gas develop­ ment, wells were drilled with cable-tool rigs. According to Jillson (1946, p. 17), when a well encountered gas it was allowed to "blow it­ self out" in the hope of bringing on commer­ cial amounts of oil, even though this practice was detrimental to the ultimate recovery of oil in the field. Unfortunately, reservoir pres­ sure data are not available for the fields in this play. In current practice, wells are air-ro­ tary drilled and typically completed in the open-hole below 7-inch casing. If stimulation is deemed necessary, most wells are acidized 300 Miles in the open hole. , ' , ', Average initial open flows, after stimula- 0 soo Kilometers tion, for various fields in the play range be- ~ Clean carbonate rocks ~ tween 8 and 500 thousand cubic feet of gas ~ (limestone and dolomite) ~ Clastic rocks coarser than shale per day (Mcfgpd), with many less than 100 e=r=5l Argillaceous carbonate rocks or D Clastic rocks prograded over g;;g interbedded carbonate shale carbonate rocks Mcfgpd. The overall average reported flow (n=7) is 368 Mcfgpd, and the median flow is P,7,7,i:l Shale A Approximate limit of ~ ~, marine rocks 45 Mcfgpd. The maximum flow recorded was 7.5 million cubic feet of gas per day Figure 7. Facies distribution of eastern North America during Sher­ (11:Mcfgpd) from the Tennessee Land and manian (Lexington!Trenton) time, according to data derived from Exploration Company No. 1 Gilbert Bishop COSUNA charts by Keith {1988). and others, Carter coordinate section 6-J-71, in the Trixie Consolidated Field, Clay mainly derived from drillers' logs, geophysical logs, County, Ky. The low matrix porosity of the reservoir and accounts of production from the literature. suggests that production may have been enhanced by According to Sullivan (1983), stratigraphic traps of fracture permeability, however. The drive mechanism for the Upper Ordovician Granville zone are sealed by these Middle and Upper Ordovician bioclastic reservoirs fine-grained, impermeable strata and tightly ce­ is interpreted to be gas expansion. mented grainstone s. The primary source of the hydro­ Reservoir porosity was calculated from logs available carbons in this play is the organic-rich in four fields and from one core analysis. Average matrix Mississippian-Devonian black-shale sequence. An ad­ porosity for all five fields is 11.8 percent and the maxi­ ditional local source may be the very dark-gray mum porosity is 15 percent. The dominant porosity types dolomudstones and shales of the Lexington Lime­ are moldic, interparticulate, intraparticulate, and inter­ stone, which have a total organic content (TOC) of up crystalline. The core from the Jarvis No. 2 Dickens well, to 2 percent (Sullivan, 1983). Major migration avenues Granville Consolidated Pool, Clinton County, indicates for hydrocarbons derived from the Devonian shales in an average reservoir permeability of 57.1 millidarcies the basin are provided by faults, fractures, and the (md) and a maximum permeability of 293 md (Appendix Ordovician Knox paleokarst system. In Kentucky, A). where the Middle and Upper Ordovician sequence is a common drilling target, depths to the pay range from KEY FIELD less than 200 feet along the crest of the Cincinnati Arch to more than 2,000 feet farther east into the Appala­ Granville Consolidated Pool, chian basin. Where the Middle and Upper Ordovician Clinton County, Kentucky sequence is deeper than 2,000 feet, the bioclastic reser­ Reservoirs in the Granville Consolidated Pool, Carter voirs of this play are not usually a primary drilling coordinate section D-52, Clinton County, are typical of target. Net pay thickness averages 10 feet, whereas the the offshore bars developed on the Middle and Upper RESOURCES AND RESERVES 9

associated hydrocarbon production. Expan­ sion of gas associated with oil production is the primary reservoir drive. An estimated 770 acres produce nonassociated gas, and an esti­ mated 2,000 acres produce oil. The average spacing, by statute, is 1,000 feet between gas wells, although many wells were drilled prior to adoption of the current regulations in 1960, and are spaced 400 feet or less apart. The producing intervals range from 600 to nearly 800 feet in depth, with an average net pay thickness of 9 feet. Calculated from available logs, the average porosity of the producing intervals is 14 percent. D RESOURCES AND RESERVES Regional production data available at the Kentucky Geological Survey indicate an esti­ mated 50 to 100 MMcl of gas per year is pro­ duced from central Kentucky Trenton reservoirs along the western margin of the Appalachian Basin. This estimate does not ac­ count for an unknown number of domestic gas supply wells, nor does it account for gas production from Trenton reservoirs in eastern Kentucky pools that is commingled with other producing zones. This general lack of produc­ tion data makes resource and reserves esti­ 52 mates extremely speculative. Jillson (1946) asserted that as much as 20 to 25 MMcf had

0 2 3 Miles been discovered, plugged, and abandoned in the areas of Kentucky he studied. Because of 0 2 3 4 Kllometers limited reservoir and production data, little is known of the potential for gas in the bioclastic Contour interval 20 Feet reservoirs of this play in Ohio (Marc Bara­ Figure 8. Structure on top of the Devonian Chattanooga Shale for noski, Ohio Geological Survey, oral com.mun., part of Clinton County (Thomas and others, 1950). Contour interval 1994) and West Virginia. equals 20 feet. With the potential for additional reservoirs, Ordovician carbonate shelf. The detailed study of the the proximity of viable source rocks, and field by Sullivan (1983) is a key to understanding this sparse drilling in certain localities, this play should have play. The pool encompasses several older producing undiscovered recoverable gas resources as defined by pools in the Granville trend that were discovered be­ Miller and others (1975). The method selected in this tween 1861 and 1944 (Diamond, 1943; Jillson, 1946; report to estimate the undiscovered recoverable gas re­ Perkins, 1955). The reservoirs in the pool, the First and sources was a statistical-volumetric procedure. Probable Second Granville zones, constitute a stacked shoaling limits of the potentially productive argillaceous and sequence (Sullivan, 1983). An isopach map·of the First clean carbonates deposited in Shermanian and Cincinna­ Granville zone is shown in Figure 9 (Sullivan, 1983). tian time are outlined in Figure l. These areas are esti­ The thicker barrier-bar systems have been correlated mated to be 72.7 million acres and 23.7 million acres, with areas having the best oil and gas production respectively. Arbitrarily, 50 percent of each potentially (Sullivan, 1983). Figure 10 is a north-south cross sec­ productive area was eliminated from consideration. The tion through the Granville Consolidated Pool area that areas eliminated are located where the reservoir units illustrates the distribution of the Granville zones and crop out, are too shallow, are judged too deep to be an economically feasible primary drilling target, or underlie 10 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

restricted areas such as rivers, cities, and parks. Based model the resource parameters for Monte Carlo (ran­ on the distribution of current fields, we estimated that dom) simulation. 0.5 percent of the remaining acreage would be poten­ The Monte Carlo simulation was achieved using the tially productive. Resource calculations were per­ RISK program (Cowan, 1984). Each generated cumula­ formed for each area separately, and then their total tive frequency distribution was divided into three resources were aggregated. classes, with the midpoint of each class chosen as the Using the guidelines and triangular distribution expected minimum, most likely, and expected maximum methods of Megill (1977), absolute minimum, most values for the simulation. The probability of each class likely, and absolute maximum production values for was the calculated frequency of the class from the cumu­ millions of cubic feet of gas per acre-foot lative frequency distribution. Because of the parameters (MMd/ AcFt);net pay thickness; and productive acre­ chosen, the probability of the minimum Monte Carlo age were selected as the most critical parameters. simulation value exceeded the probability of the most These data are shown in Table l. Cumulative fre­ likely value of the acreage estimates skewing the esti­ quency distributions were generated from the triangu­ mates toward more conservative values. RISK generates lar distribution parameters and used to statistically a data set of resource estimates by selecting each of the

D Barrier Bar Systems 0 5 Miles I ~ Tidal Channels I I 5 Kilometers

Figure 9. lsopach map of the First Granville zone of the Lexington Limestone in south-central Kentucky, showing barrier bar and tidal channel complexes (Sullivan, 1983). Contour interval equals 1O feet. Line of section shown in Figure 10. RESOURCES AND RESERVES 11

LETICA RESOVRCES No 1 STOCKTON CUM!!ER1AND OIL CORP No I JASON 8UTtER Gamma Ft MOOERN VENDING A No 1.A PE.Rlan } ) ! !Soc 500 und,119':fentiateo w.tltte,e11ua1ea ~ t c,...... ~ ( Cloy, f•NY undtlfereotio11ea l {- Formabon Garra,aSllt.s.1on.e lsoc Oarra,o S11ts1on•< \ G.atlSJIJ 541.stont) ~ E ' <... 5 ~ < ( t -" ~ ... ..f ~ ~ il' t r I '\ ( >an1«:1 SC!l$1on4 ~r\Jt3talflllf1• Clo\'$ fo,"I \ i Clar< Feny Garrard Sllaront ~ (-'/. t formauon ... < 60< C&or / f,,...... )91 / o/ }r ;{, ~ \\ CJ1ysfll.fty \ l ' , l\:> f 60( 1 Fonnarlon { F0tmabot1 ~ I~. J #' < 1( I > t / ,...,. ~s.tGr,~i. ? '>•"'/J r LU11"19IOO s / / 5 > ~ .< \ Lvnt~on• (/ -~ I ( J Daium <; ) _.J ',, \K F1~~v1r,,. ,{ ,·~ \ ,' ' v ~ ;, -~ l~=tt!~ If ffrst Oran"'1l;> , 9ecor,d G; S&co()d Gr.arw1U l70C ,,., t Lexington l. ( 1 1 ~ s ~- } 1" < leOC ~ ~ " 70C ~ ! Lexington ~S;_ ls i,.oc { limestone 180< ~ liol: ~ Le.l(1ngton ~ ~ ""-; u...... ,; ( [ ?") $" 110( LIW:inQ10M f i l•IT'41ton• 1.,~"9101\ { i ) ·~ \.1meston• i < ;: 90( ~ U.xln,gton ISOC ~ ~ \ ~ ) Umeslone ~ 900 ~ l } { ! 1 ~ ~ M UdC4Vt ~ I( ') MuoCave \? i '"' f>.ncllCavt-....._...... , ~.._ r- l ~ ~ !.-.,,-',..-> ~ 1.. g. ),. i MudCih'&<2-.,~ \ Mu,d C-lvt ~ \\ II ,, { _,_ ~ud Cave f l ! r l...5"" PenolCJve ::' •= Penc.d C..ve -....._ ""> iO 16QC PancilCm- '7 ' pooc :,: ? -- ' Mud Cave -....._ ~ ~ $ ~ ...... Pe.ndCav.t~ ) --; L..s._ .,c ' iI ---. '

Figure 10. North- south structural cross section of part of Clinton County showing the distribution of Granville zone (diagonal lines) and hydrocarbon production (Sullivan, 1983). See Figure 9 for location. 12 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN l!IOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Tidle 1. Summary of undiscovered recoverable resource calculations for Ordovician bioclastic carbonate play.

Net Pav Acre""'"'e Recove"' Resources Category Thousands Thickness Met per Probabilffy Probability Probability (BcQ of Acres tfeetl Ac Ft 'nnar Oroovtlcilln fexclusive of Lexinaton/Trentonl Minimum 1 50"/. 2 25% 98 27% 0.2 Most Likely 3 40% 9 65% 327 55% 8.8 Maximum 5 10% 25 10% 556 18% 70.7 10th PercentHe 0.8 50th Percentile 2.7 90th Percentite 8.8

Weighted Mean 4 Lexinaton/Trenton Minimum 29 50% 2 25% 98 27% 5.7 Most Likely 92 40% 9 65% 327 55% 270.5 Ma>rimum 155 10% 25 10% 556 18% 2154.50 10th Percentile 25.5 50th Percentile 85.1 90th PercentKe 270.5 Weighted Mean 122.8 Total Undiscovered Resources Estimate for Pfav Obc 10th Percenrne (90"/o chance of at least this) 26 9oth Percentile (10% chance of at least this) 279 Total Weighted Mean Undiscovered Recoverable Resources (Bcf) 127

three parameters at the given frequencies of occur· rence. This data set is then analyzed for percentiles, FUTURE TRENDS means, and other statistics. Additional gas·bearing bioclastic reservoirs in the The undiscovered recoverable resource estimates Middle and Upper Ordovician sequence will probably be for the play are probabilistic and range from 26.3 bcf discovered as lithofacies, structural, and seismic map· at the 90 percent level of confidence to 279.3 bcf at the ping of shoaling sequences improves. Localized struc· 10 percent level of confidence. That is, there is a 90 tural highs along regional flexures may be a key to percent chance that undiscovered resources are at least finding reservoirs, because the highs may control the 26.3 bcf. The estimated total weighted mean for undis· location of winnowed bioclastic bars. In general, these covered recoverable resources for the Lexington Lime· reservoirs will probably not be the primary target for stone (Trenton) and Cincinnatian Series combined is future drilling outside of southern and eastern Kentucky 127 bcf (from Monte Carlo simulation). along the margin of the basin. Here, the reservoirs are relatively deep (for example, at drilling depths greater than 2,000 feet), and represent subtle stratigraphic fea· tures that will be difficult to detect with seismic or re· mote·sensing methods. However, as exploration and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 13

development continues for Lower Ordovician and A. W., eds., Proceedings of the Sixth International Con­ Upper Cambrian carbonate reservoirs, these bioclastic ference on Basement Tectonics, Salt Lake City, Utah: carbonate bars will merit further evaluation. In addi­ International Basement Tectonics Association, p. tion, given sufficient reservoir seal, they may represent 140-152. a potential for development as gas storage fields. Black, D.F.B., Cressman, E.R., and MacQuown, W.C., Jr., 1965, The Lexington Limestone. (Middle Ordovician) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS of central Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1224-C, 29 p. This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Morgantown Energy Technology Center un­ Carter, Burchard, Miller, Peter, and Smosna, Richard, der contract number DE-FC21-91MC28176. It will ap­ 1988, Environmental aspects of Middle Ordovician pear as a chapter in "The Atlas of Major Appalachian limestones in the central Appalachians: Sedimentary Gas Plays," currently in press. The atlas is a multi-state Geology, v. 58, no. 1, p. 23-36 .. cooperative project that includes researchers from the Cowan, H.D., 1984, RISK.BAS, Monte Carlo estimation of geological surveys of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, petroleum reserves: Computer Oriented Geological and West Virginia; contractors from Maryland, New Society Disk 2, GWBasic computer program. York, Tennessee, and Virginia; the Petroleum Engi­ neering Department of West Virginia University; and Cressman, E.R., 1973, Lithostratigraphy and depositional the Appalachian Oil and Natural Gas Research Con­ environments of the Lexington Limestone (Ordovi­ sorti.um and the U.S. Geological Survey. Consult the cian) of central Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Pro­ atlas volume for other chapters referenced in this fessional Paper 768, 61 p. work. Cressman, E.R., and Noger, M.C., 1976, Tidal-flat carbon­ Many companies and individuals throughout the ate environments in the High Bridge Group (Middle basin contributed reservoir, production, and reserves Ordovician) of central Kentucky: Kentucky Geological data and without their generous cooperation, this pro­ Survey, ser. 10, Report of Investigations 18, 15 p. ject would not have been possible. I wish to acknow­ ledge Doug Patchen of both the West Virginia Diamond, Woodson, 1943, The Desda oil pool in Clinton Geologic and Economic Survey and the Appalachian County, Kentucky: Frankfort, Kentucky, Frankfort Oil and Natural Gas Research Consortium for his un­ Publishing Company, 19 p. flagging efforts as the overall project coordinator and Freeman, L.B., 1953, Regional subsurface stratigraphy of reviewer. I want to thank the Kentucky Geological the Cambrian and Ordovician in Kentucky and vicin­ Survey editors and reviewers, Jim Drahovzal, Dave ity: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 9, Bulletin 12, 352 Harris, Matt Humphreys, Meg Smath, and Ann Wat­ p. son; they got the play out of the door. Thanks also go Ginsburg, R.N., ed., 1975, Tidal deposits: A case book of to John Roen (the atlas technical editor), Bill recent examples and counterparts: New York, Daugherty, Jesse Kincheloe, Bob Ryder, and Art Van Tyne for their data, reviews, and suggestions. I would Springer~Verlag, 428 p. like to thank other present and former employees of Harper, John, 1979, Subsurface rock correlation diagram, the Kentucky Geological Survey who compiled basic Allegheny Plateau, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Geo­ data on producing fields, made suggestions, and logical Survey, 1 sheet. worked ceaselessly on the atlas project: Terence Ham­ Heck, E.T., 1948, New York subsurface geology, in Galey, ilton-Smith, Joe Meglen, Tom Sparks, and Dan Walker. Finally, I want to thank Mike Murphy, drafting tech­ J .T, chairman, editorial committee, Appalachian Basin Ordovician Symposium: American Association of Pe­ nician for KGS, who will know at last that when this troleum Geologists, v. 32, no. 8, p. 1449-1456. is printed there will be no more changes to the draw­ ings. Hrabar, S.V., Cressman, E.R., and Potter, P.E., 1971, Crossbedding of the Tanglewood Limestone Member of the Lexington Limestone (Ordovician) of the Blue REFERENCES CITED Grass Region of Kentucky: Brigham Young University Baranoski, Marc, in press, Ordovician Trenton to Knox Geology Studies, v. 18,no. 1, p. 99-114. fractured carbonate play, in Atlas of major Appala­ Huff, W.D., and Kolata, D.R., 1990, Correlation of the chian gas plays: West Virginia Geologic and Eco­ Ordovician Deicke and Millbrig K-bentonites between nomic Survey. the Mississippi Valley and the southern Appalachians: Black, D.F.B., 1986, Oil in dolomitized limestone reser­ American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulle­ voirs in Kentucky, in Aldrich, M.J., and Laughlin, tin, v. 74, no. 11, p. 1736-1747. 14 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Jillson, W.R., 1946, The oil and gas pools of Clinton and Mississippian) in Kentucky, central sheet: Ken­ County, Kentucky: Frankfort, Ky., Roberts Printing tucky Geological Survey, ser. 10, scale 1:250,000. Company, 36 p. Shaver, RH., 1985, Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of Keith, B.D., 1988, Regional facies of Upper Ordovician North America (COSUNA) Project-Midwestern Ba­ Series of eastern North America, in Keith, B.D., sin and Arches region: American Association of Petro­ 1988, The Trenton Group (Upper Ordovician Se­ leum Geologists, 1 sheet. ries) of eastern North America; deposition, di­ Smosna, Richard, 1985, Day-to-day sedimentation on an agenesis, and petroleum: American Association of Ordovician carbonate ramp punctuated by storms and Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology 29, p. elastic influxes: Northeastern Geology, v. 7, nos. 3/4, 1-16. p.167-177. Maslowski, -Andrew, 1986, Harlem field is model in Sullivan, M.P., 1983, The Granville fades: Middle Ordo­ central Ohio: Northeast Oil World, v. 6, no. 1, p. vician barrier-beach hydrocarbon reservoirs in south­ 15-17. central Kentucky: Cincinnati, Ohio, University of Megill, R.E., 1977, An introduction to risk analysis: Cincinnati, M.S. Thesis, 150 p. Tulsa, Okla., Petroleum Publishing Company, 199 Sullivan, M.P., and Pryor, W.A., 1988, The Granville pay P· zone: A shallow Upper Ordovician limestone reser­ :Miller, B.M., Thomsen,H.L., Dolton,G.L.,Coury,A.B., voir in the Lexington Limestone of south-central Ken­ Hendricks, T.A., Lennartz, F.E., Powers, R.B., Sable, tucky, in Keith, B.D., The Trenton Group (Upper E.G., and Varnes, KL., 1975, Geological estimates Ordovician Series) of eastern North America; deposi­ of undiscovered recoverable oil and gas resources tion, diagenesis, and petroleum: American Associa­ in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Circu­ tion of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology 29, p. lar 725, 78 p. 299-316. New York Division of Mineral Resources, 1987, His­ Thomas, G.R, Settle, H.W., and Wood, E.B., 1950, Recon­ torical digest: Trenton and Black River Formations, naissance oil and gas and structural geologic map of in New York State Oil and Gas Drilling and Produc­ Clinton County: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser. 9, tion 1986: New York State Department of Environ­ scale 1:63,360. mental Conservation, Division of Mineral Resources, p. 27-33. Walker, RG., and James, N.P., eds., 1992, Fades mod­ els-Response to sea level change: Geological Associa­ Patchen, D.G., Avary, KL., and Erwin, RB., 1985a, tion of Canada, 409 p. Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) Project-Northern Appalachian re­ Weir, G.W., and Greene, RC., 1965, Clays Ferry Forma­ gion: American Association of Petroleum Geolo­ tion (Ordovician)-A new map unit in south-central gists, 1 sheet. Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1224-B, 18 Patchen, b.G., Avary, KL., and Erwin, RB., 1985b, P· Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of North America Weir, G.W., Peterson, W.L., and Swadley, W C, 1984, (COSUNA) Project-Southern Appalachian re­ Lithostratigraphy of Upper Ordovician strata exposed gion: American Association of _Petroleum Geolo­ in Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Pa­ gists, 1 sheet. per 1151-E, 121 p. Perkins, J.H., 1955, Geology of the Decide Pool, Clin­ Wilson, E.N., and Sutton, D.G., 1973, Oil and gas map of ton County, Kentucky: Kentucky Geological Sur­ Kentucky, sheet 3, east-central part: Kentucky Geo­ vey, ser. 9, Bulletin 17, 33 p. logical Survey, ser. 10, scale 1:250,000. Potter, P.E., 1978, Structure and isopach map of the Wilson, J.L., 1975, Carbonate facies in geologic history: New Albany-Chattanooga-Ohio Shale (Devonian New York, Springer-Verlag, 471 p. APPENDIX A 15

APPENDIX A. Data on Upper Ordovician Bioclastic Carbonate (Trenton) Limestone Play 16 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Appendix A. Data on Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play.

PlavNo. Obc Obc Obc Obc Poof Name Albanv Cons Chicken Gizzard Orv Ridae Granville Cons Pool No. 1602248365SBRK 1600421361DRKS 1600591365LXTN 1600809361GRNV Latitude 36.624989 37.380614 38.688166 36.761656 Longitude -85.208262 -85.0n518 -84.59104 -85.20828 Discovered 1939 1986 1987 1861 Depth to Too Reservoir 497 162 325 711 Aae of Reservoir Ordovician Ordovician Ordovician Ordovician Producina Rese1Voir Sunnvbrook Drakes Fm. Lexinmon Ls. Granville Utho/oav Limestone Limestone Limestone Limestone Trao TvMe Combination Combination Combination Combination Shallow marine Shallow marine Deoositional Environment Marine shelf Marine shelf Discoven, Well IP fMCF) 10 Drive Mechanism Gas Gas exaansion Gas Gas expansion No. Producina Wells 2 14 19 6 No. Abandoned Wells 1 Area facreaaeJ 150 1050 1680 770 Well Soacina 20 20 20 20

Oldest Formation Penetrated 327KNOX 365MRFB 365LXTN 368KNOX Expected Heterogeneity Due to Deoosition Dominant Dominant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Dia_aenesis Locallv imoortant Dominant Locallv imnortant Dominant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Fracturina Dominant Locally important Locallv imoortant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Structure Somewhat Continuitv of ReseJVoir Unknown Unknown discontinuous Continuous

Averaoe Pav Thickness fft.) 29 5 9 9 Average Completion Thickness {ft.) 13 7 15 18 Averaoe Matrix Densin, 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.71 Averaae Porosirv-Lo_a (%) 10.0% 14.0%

Minimum Porositv-Loa (%) 4.0% 4.0%

Maximum Porosih1-Loa (%) 13.0% 15.0% No. of Data Points 4 3

Averaae Porositv-Core (%) 13.1% Minimum Porosity-Core '%) 12.2% Maximum Porosity-Core '%) 14.9% No. of Data Points 1 Avera_ae Permeabilit 57.1 Minimum Permeabif" 1.5 Maximum Permeabili~ 293 APPENDIX A 17

Appendix A. Data on Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play.

PlavNo. Obc Obc Obc Obc Poof Name Raccoon Mountain Sevenh•-six Cons 8Uf18T Hill Trixie Cons Poof No. 1601600365TRNT 1601766361 GRNV 1601920361GRNV 1602002365TRNT Latitude 37.124989 36.791656 37.132097 37.291655 Lonaitude ·83.958316 -85.124947 -84.549143 ·83.708335 · Discovered 1923 1946 1990 1981 Depth to Top Reservoir 2190 695 859 2654 Aae of Reservoir Ordovician Ordovician Ordovician Ordovician Producina Reservoir Trenton Ls. Granville Granville Trenton Ls. Litho/oav Limestone Limestone Limestone Limestone TraD T•me Combination Combination Combination Combination

Depositional Environment Marine Marine Marine Marine Discoverv Well IP fMCF) 75 60 154 Drive Mechanism Gas Gas Gas Gas No. Producina Wells 1 1 3 2 No. Abandoned Wells 1 Area facreaae) 20 20 150 100 Well Soacina 20 20 20 20

Oldest Formation Penetrated 327KNOX 361GRNV 361GRNV 365TRNT Expected Heterogeneity Due to Denosition Dominant Dominant Dominant Dominant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Dia_aenesis Locallv imoortant Locallv imoortant Locallv imnortant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Fracturina Not a'"''"'licable Locallv imoortant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Structure Not annlicable

Continuihr of Rese,voir Unknown Unknown Unknown Discontinuous

Avera.Qe Pav Thickness (ft.I 11 1 12 Average Completion Thickness (ft.J 40 13 1 13 Averaae Matrix Densitv 2.71 2.71 2.71 2.75 Averaae Parosin1-Loa /%) 11.0% 3.0%

Minimum Porositv-Loa (%) 4.0% 2

Maximum Porosm1-Loo (%. 11.0% No. of Data Points 1

Averaae Porositv-Core (%) Minimum Porosity-Core %) Maximum Porosity-Core %) No. of Data Points Averaae Perrneabilitv Minimum Perrneabilitv Maximum Perrneabifirv 18 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Appendix A. Data on Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play. PlavNo. Obc Pool Name Windv Citv Pao/No. 1602139361LPRS Latitude 36.708322 Lonaitude -84.958271 Discovered 1920 Death to Toe; Reservoir 500 Aae of Reservoir Ordovician Producina Reservoir Leioers Ls. Litho/om, Limestone Trap Tv, e Combination

Deoositional Environment Marine Discovery Well IP IMCFl 500 Drive Mechanism Gas No. Producin!J Wells 1 No. Abandoned Wells rea 1acrea_c,eJ 20 Well Soacina 20

Oldest Formation Penetrated 327KNOX Expected Heterogeneity Due to Deoosition Dominant Expected Heterogeneity Due to Diaaenesis Locally important Expected Heterogeneity Due to Fracturina Expected Heterogeneity Due to Structure

Continum .. of Reservoir Unknown

Avera_ae Pav Thickness fft.l 10 Average Completion Thickness (ft.) 10 Averaoe Matrix Densi"' 2.71 Averaae Porosin1-Loa (%) 13.0%

Minimum Porosi*',_, oa (%) 4.0%

Maximum Porositv-Loa f%l 15.0% No. of Data Points 1

Averaae Porositu-Core (%) Minimum Porosity-Core %) Maximum Porosity-Core %) No. of Data Points Averaoe Permeabili"' Minimum Permeabilirv Maximum Permeabi/itv APPENDIX A 19

Appendix A. Data on Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play. PfavNo. Obe Obe Obe Obe Pool Name Albanv Cons Chicken Gizzard Orv Aidoe Granville Cons

Ava. Horizontal Permeabi/itv 57.1 Ava. Vertical Permeabifin, Initial Shut-In Pressure 125 50 Casina or Tubina Casino Casinq Casino Casina Hours 24 24 Present Shuf.ln Pressure 100 75 50 Casino or Tubina Casino Casino CasinQ Casino Hours 24 10 24 Date of Present Pressure 1991 1988 1988 Earth Pressure Gradient Underoressured Underoressured Underoressured Undemressured Reservoir Temperature 66 65 Rw Gas Gravirv 0.642 Gas Saturation f%1 Water Saturation {%J Commin.aled Yes No No No Associated or Nonassociated Nonassociated Nonassociated Nonassociated Nonassociated Heatina Value (Btu) 1002 Status (Producing, Abandoned, Stora_oe) Producinq Producino Producina Producina Production Data Initial Year Production Data Final Year

Cumulative Production (Met) No. Wells Oriainal Gas in Place (McfJ

Oriainal Gas Reserves fMcn Remaining Gas In Place , Mel) Remainina GIP Year Remaining Gas Reserves Men Remainina Reserves Year Avera_Qe /OF (Mcf/d Averaae FOF fMcf!dl 105 294 314 8 Recoverv Factor (% Tvoical Loas No loas None available GR/FDCITEMP GRD 65/8" @120'; 7" @ 450'; open natural; open hole; 7" @ 90'; open 4 1/2" @ 700'; 500 Tvnica/ Comoletion Practice hole; natural Swell hole; natural aal. acid over zone Est. pay thick from All wells prd. Several wells used Comments driller's reoort Drakes Fm. as aas 20 MIDDLE AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BIOCLASTIC CARBONATE PLAY IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN

Appendix A. Data on Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play.

Plav No. Obc Obc Obc Obc Pool Name Raccoon Mountain Seven ... ·-six Cons Sllnar Hill Trixie Cons·

Ava. Horizontal Permeabilitv Ava. Vertical Permeabifit., Initial Shut-In Pressure 300 50 260 Casino or Tubin_a Casinn Casinn Casinn Casino Hours 24 Present Shut-In Pressure Casino or Tubing Casino Casinn Casinn Casina Hours Date of Present Pressure Earth Pressure Gradient Undernressured Undernressured Undemressured Unde""'ressured Reservoir Temrn::,rature 65 Rw Gas Gravfrv Gas Saturation (%) Water Saturation f%l Comminaled Yes No No No Associated or Nonassociated Nonassociated Nonassociated Nonassociated Nonassociated Heatina Value (Btu) Status (Producing, Abandoned, Storaae) Producinn Producinn Producinn Producina Production Data Initial Year 1990 Production Data Final Year 1992

Cumulative Production (McfJ 20,000 No. Wells 3 Ori.ainal Gas in Place fMcfl

Ori_qinal Gas Reserves fMcfl Remaining Gas In Place Men Remainina GIP Year Remaining Gas Reserves Men Remainina Reserves Year Averaae /OF tMcfld 75 Averaae FOF IMcf/dl 55 53 Recoverv Factor(% Tvnical Lo.as None GR/FDC None FDC?NBC/GR

7" @ 768': open 7"@ 418'; open 7" @ 500'; open 7~ @ 850'; open T•mical Comoletion Practice hole; natural hole; natural hole' natural hole; 1000 aa. acid Pay est. from Pay est. from Comments driller's reoort driller's renort APPENDIX A 21

Appendix A. Data on Upper Ordovician bioclastic carbonate (Trenton) limestone play. PlavNo. Obe Pool Name Windv Citv

Av:q. Horizontal Permeabilitv va. Vertical Permeabilirv nitial Shut-In Pressure 100 Casing or Tubing CasinQ Hours Present Shut-In Pressure Casino or Tubina Casino Hours Date of Present Pressure Earth Pressure Gradient Undemressured Resetvoir Temoerature ~w Gas Gravitv Gas Saturation (%) Water Saturation f%J Commin_aled No tJassociated or rvonassociated Nonassociated 1-featina Value fBtul ::,ratus (Producing, Abandoned, Storage) Producinq roduction Data Initial Year Production Data Final Year

Cumulative Production (Men 111vo. Wells Oriainal Gas in Place (Mcfl

OriQinal Gas Reserves IMcn Remaining Gas In Place MeO emainina GIP Year emaining Gas Rese,ves Men emainina Rese,ves Year vera_Qe /OF (Mcf/d veraae FOF (Mcf!d) 500 Recoverv Factor (% Tvoical Loos GR/FDC

81/4"@ 13'; 614" 7.,nica/ Comoletion Practice @288' Completed as Comments domestic aas MISSION STATEMENT

The Kentucky Geological Survey at the University of Kentucky is a State-man­ dated organization whose mission is the collection, preservation, and dissemi­ nation of information about mineral and water resources and the geology of the Commonwealth. KGS has conducted research on the geology and mineral resources of Kentucky for more than 150 years, and has developed extensive public databases for oil and gas, coal, water, and industrial minerals that are used by thousands of citizens each year. The Survey's efforts have resulted in topographic and geologic map coverage for Kentucky that has not been matched by any other state in the Nation.

One of the major goals of the Kentucky Geological Survey is to make the results of basic and applied research easily accessible to the public. This is accomplished through the publication of both technical and nontechnical reports and maps, as well as providing information through open-file reports and public databases.