DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Maternal & Neonatal Outcomes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Maternal & Neonatal Outcomes Toolkit for Reducing Cesarean Deliveries Improving Maternal & Neonatal Outcomes Fall 2013 This toolkit represents a collaborative effort among the Washington State Health Care Authority, the Optimizing Birth Outcomes Workgroup, and the Center for Evidence-based Policy at Oregon Health & Science University. The toolkit was developed and reviewed by these stakeholders and other content area experts. This document was prepared by the Center under contract No. K414 for the Washington State Health Care Authority. The document is intended as a reference and is provided with the understanding that the Center is not engaged in rendering any clinical, legal, business, or other professional advice. Suggested citation: King, V., Slaughter-Mason, S., King, A., Frew, P., Thompson, J., Evans, R. & Donsbach, L. (2013). Improving Maternal & Neonatal Outcomes: Toolkit for Reducing Cesarean Deliveries. Portland, OR: Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University. Washington State Health Care Authority Center for Evidence-based Policy 626 8th Avenue SE Oregon Health & Science University Olympia, WA 98501 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Road Portland, OR 97239 www.hca.wa.gov www.ohsu.edu/policycenter Authors: Valerie King, MD, MPH Samantha Slaughter-Mason, MPH Anne King, MBA Patty Frew, MD Jeffery Thompson, MD, MPH Randy Evans, MA Landon Donsbach The authors are particularly grateful to the Washington State Optimizing Birth Outcomes Workgroup for their thoughtful contributions to this toolkit, and give special thanks to: Laurie Cawthon, MD Ellen Kauffman, MD Polly Taylor, CNM, MPH, ARNP Suzan Walker, RN, BSN, MPH Table of Contents Foreword Message from Dr. Daniel Lessler .............................................................................. 6 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction 9 Epidemiology of Cesarean Birth ............................................................................ 12 References .................................................................................................................. 17 2. Evidence-based Strategies 19 Evidence-based Medicine ......................................................................................... 20 Evidence-based Strategies to Safely Reduce Cesarean Birth Rates ............... 22 Before Labor ................................................................................................. 23 During Labor ................................................................................................ 33 Systems Level Interventions ...................................................................... 39 Evidence Summary .................................................................................................... 41 Comparing Recommendations & Guidelines to the Evidence ........................ 44 References .................................................................................................................. 47 3. Innovative Models 51 Group Health Cooperative ..................................................................................... 53 Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative ................................................................... 54 Seton Health ............................................................................................................... 55 Swedish Health Services .......................................................................................... 56 Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital ........................................................................... 57 4. Managing Change 58 Establishing an Environment Conducive to Change .......................................... 60 Case Study .................................................................................................... 61 Leveraging Evidence & Tools for Rapid Quality Improvement ........................ 62 Implementing the Interventions: Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle ............................ 63 References .................................................................................................................. 66 5. Resources 67 Before Labor ............................................................................................................... 69 During Labor .............................................................................................................. 73 Systems Level ............................................................................................................. 75 Organizations & Collaborations ............................................................................ 76 Tools &Templates ...................................................................................................... 78 6. Appendices 81 A: Data & Performance Measure Definitions ...................................................... 83 B: Washington State Perinatal Quality Improvement Survey ........................... 89 Message from Dr. Daniel Lessler early one third of all NU.S. women are giving A clear, user-friendly guide to current evidence birth by Cesarean, and an of practices that can improve the quality of care ever increasing number are and outcomes is required. Evaluating data for undergoing induction of labor benchmarking outcomes and examples of best and Cesarean deliveries. practices will allow us to continuously improve. Our challenge, as health This toolkit brings together a set of resources practitioners, has been to sponsored by the Washington State Health Care understand the variations Authority and the Center for Evidence-based Policy at in clinical practices that are Oregon Health & Science University. This toolkit will affecting the decision to help to make maternal and infant care more evidence- perform a Cesarean delivery. based, transparent, consistent, and measured to reduce WeDr. Danielsimultaneously Lessler seek to improve the quality of variation in care across Washington State. Additionally, care and reduce unnecessary care, including Cesarean we hope this toolkit will help to forge stronger deliveries. According to a 2009 report on Maternal and partnerships between obstetricians, family medicine Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor physicians, midwives, and hospitals in order to: from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Bring the best, most current evidence to (AHRQ), labor inductions increased from 9.5% in 1990 providers and care systems for the women and to 22.1% in 2004. This increase occurred without a infants of Washington State clear understanding of the medical need or rationale and without any associated improvement in outcomes. Challenge providers, hospitals, and systems to Medicaid covers over 40% of all births nationally. measure, compare, and improve to the greatest State and federal insurance programs work closely extent possible with community clinicians and facilities to provide Embrace measurement to make our healthcare maternity services. It is clear that ensuring access, system sustainable improving quality, and promoting cost efficiency are Share learning and experience with others so best achieved when we use the best available evidence we are all able to improve to guide care. Using data to highlight variations in care can help identify opportunities for improvement. We hope that this document assists you in your work There are multiple reports documenting associations to improve the health of mothers and infants in your between labor and delivery practices (i.e. elective community. delivery without a medical indication) and maternal and neonatal morbidity. We must both monitor and find “best practices,” and actively engage in discussions of why there are unnecessary variations in care. Daniel Lessler, MD, MHA Chief Medical Officer Washington State Health Care Authority 6 Figure 1.1. Washington State Timeline of Change Activities, 2008-2012 Washington Department of Health publishes 2008 Cesarean Sections in Washington State: Trends and Sep Geographic Variations Aug Washington State Perinatal Collaborative formed (initially Cesarean Section Workgroup) “Reduction of Elective Deliveries at Swedish Hospital” presented at Pacific Coast Society Oct First Washington State Perinatal Quality Improvement Survey Feb Apr 2009 Childbirth Connection sponsored national policy symposium, “Transforming Maternity Care: A High Value Proposition” in Washington, DC Safety Net Assessment (HB 2956) passed by Apr Washington Legislature 2010 Sep Early elective deliveries selected as one of five Medicaid quality measures as part of Safety Net Elimination of Non-Medically Indicated (Elective) Assessment Deliveries Before 39 Weeks Gestational Age published Oct Data Collection for 37-<39 Weeks Project for 37-<39 Weeks Data Collection Jan Laws of 2011 create Robert Bree Collaborative March of Dimes launches “Healthy Babies are Worth the Wait” awareness campaign Apr 2011 Robert Bree Collaborative convened Sep Aug Robert Bree Collaborative selects obstetric care as top priority topic Hospital-level feedback reports distributed to 2012 hospitals Jun Hospital-level feedback reports posted on Oct-Dec Washington Health Care Authority’s public website Aug Second Washington State Robert Bree Collaborative Obstetrics Report Perinatal Quality Improvement Survey published & implementation plan adopted 7 Executive Summary his toolkit contains data, evidence-based such as audit and feedback, quality improvement Tstrategies and change management techniques to methodologies,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery
    Current Commentary Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal- Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop Catherine Y. Spong, MD, Vincenzo Berghella, MD, Katharine D. Wenstrom, MD, Brian M. Mercer, MD, and George R. Saade, MD points were identified to assist with reduction in cesar- With more than one third of pregnancies in the United ean delivery rates including that labor induction should States being delivered by cesarean and the growing be performed primarily for medical indication; if done knowledge of morbidities associated with repeat cesar- for nonmedical indications, the gestational age should be ean deliveries, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Insti- at least 39 weeks or more and the cervix should be favor- tute of Child Health and Human Development, the able, especially in the nulliparous patient. Review of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the American current literature demonstrates the importance of adher- College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened ing to appropriate definitions for failed induction and a workshop to address the concept of preventing the first arrest of labor progress. The diagnosis of “failed induc- cesarean delivery. The available information on maternal tion” should only be made after an adequate attempt. and fetal factors, labor management and induction, and Adequate time for normal latent and active phases of nonmedical factors leading to the first cesarean delivery the first stage, and for the second stage, should be was reviewed as well as the implications of the first allowed as long as the maternal and fetal conditions per- cesarean delivery on future reproductive health.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor and Vaginal Delivery
    VI LABOR, DELIVERY, AND POSTPARTUM LABOR AND VAGINAL DELIVERY Kelly A. Best, MD CHAPTER 61 1. What is the definition of labor? Labor begins when uterine contractions of sufficient frequency, intensity, and duration are attained to bring about effacement and progressive dilation of the cervix. 2. What two steps are theorized to be crucial to the initiation of labor in human pregnancy? 1. Retreat from pregnancy maintenance 2. Uterotonic induction Despite extensive investigation into the associated physiologic and biochemical changes, the physiologic processes in human pregnancy that result in the onset of labor are still not defined. 3. In which patients is induction of labor considered? Awaiting the onset of normal labor may not be an option in certain circumstances. At preterm gestations, indications for labor induction include severe preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction with abnormal antepartum surveillance or other evidence of fetal compromise, and deterioration of maternal disease to the point that continuation of pregnancy is believed to be detrimental. In cases of rupture of membranes without labor (i.e., premature rupture of membranes) at term (37 to 42 weeks) or postterm (≥42 weeks), induction of labor is often performed. 4. What is a Bishop score, and how is it used? A Bishop score is a quantifiable method to assess the likelihood of a successful induction. Elements include dilation, effacement, station, consistency, and position of the cervix (Table 61-1). A score of 6 or less trans- lates into a need to ripen the cervix and is associated with less successful inductions. A score 8 or greater generally means the cervix does not need ripening and induction is more likely to be successful.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 CDA Paper Abstraction Forms
    2020 OBI DATA ABSTRACTION FORMS DEMOGRAPHICS Hospital Name: Patient Last Name: Patient First Name: Medical Record Number (MRN): Maternal Birthdate (MM/DD/YY): Postal Zip Hispanic Ethnicity: Code: Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino Race (select all that apply): Unknown American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian Patient's Insurance Type: Black or African American Medicaid Self Pay/None Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Private Other: __________ White Unknown LABOR MANAGEMENT: Admission L&D Admission Date: L&D Admission Time: Provider admitting patient to Labor & Delivery (Last Name, First Name): Service/Practice patient admitted to: Admitting Nurse (Last name, First name): Certified Nurse Midwife Family Practice / Family Medicine Gravidity on admission: Parity on admission: Maternal Fetal Medicine Obstetrics Physician Maternal Height at admission: Maternal Weight at admission: Pre-pregnancy Weight: IN LBS LBS CM K G KG Did the patient receive prenatal care? If yes, date prenatal care Transfer of care from an intended home birth? started: Yes No Unable to determine Yes No LABOR MANAGEMENT: Maternal Comorbidities Present On Admission Pre-pregnancy diabetes (Type I or Type II Yes Was the patient using opioids during this Yes diabetes diagnosed prior to this pregnancy) No pregnancy? No Gestational diabetes (diagnosis in this pregnancy Yes What was the status of the patient's opioid use during this with or without medication tx) No pregnancy? (select all that apply): In treatment for opioid use disorder during pregnancy Pre-pregnancy
    [Show full text]
  • OBGYN-Study-Guide-1.Pdf
    OBSTETRICS PREGNANCY Physiology of Pregnancy: • CO input increases 30-50% (max 20-24 weeks) (mostly due to increase in stroke volume) • SVR anD arterial bp Decreases (likely due to increase in progesterone) o decrease in systolic blood pressure of 5 to 10 mm Hg and in diastolic blood pressure of 10 to 15 mm Hg that nadirs at week 24. • Increase tiDal volume 30-40% and total lung capacity decrease by 5% due to diaphragm • IncreaseD reD blooD cell mass • GI: nausea – due to elevations in estrogen, progesterone, hCG (resolve by 14-16 weeks) • Stomach – prolonged gastric emptying times and decreased GE sphincter tone à reflux • Kidneys increase in size anD ureters dilate during pregnancy à increaseD pyelonephritis • GFR increases by 50% in early pregnancy anD is maintaineD, RAAS increases = increase alDosterone, but no increaseD soDium bc GFR is also increaseD • RBC volume increases by 20-30%, plasma volume increases by 50% à decreased crit (dilutional anemia) • Labor can cause WBC to rise over 20 million • Pregnancy = hypercoagulable state (increase in fibrinogen anD factors VII-X); clotting and bleeding times do not change • Pregnancy = hyperestrogenic state • hCG double 48 hours during early pregnancy and reach peak at 10-12 weeks, decline to reach stead stage after week 15 • placenta produces hCG which maintains corpus luteum in early pregnancy • corpus luteum produces progesterone which maintains enDometrium • increaseD prolactin during pregnancy • elevation in T3 and T4, slight Decrease in TSH early on, but overall euthyroiD state • linea nigra, perineum, anD face skin (melasma) changes • increase carpal tunnel (median nerve compression) • increased caloric need 300cal/day during pregnancy and 500 during breastfeeding • shoulD gain 20-30 lb • increaseD caloric requirements: protein, iron, folate, calcium, other vitamins anD minerals Testing: In a patient with irregular menstrual cycles or unknown date of last menstruation, the last Date of intercourse shoulD be useD as the marker for repeating a urine pregnancy test.
    [Show full text]
  • Pretest Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Obstetrics and Gynecology PreTestTM Self-Assessment and Review Notice Medicine is an ever-changing science. As new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy are required. The authors and the publisher of this work have checked with sources believed to be reliable in their efforts to provide information that is complete and generally in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication. However, in view of the possibility of human error or changes in medical sciences, neither the authors nor the publisher nor any other party who has been involved in the preparation or publication of this work warrants that the information contained herein is in every respect accurate or complete, and they disclaim all responsibility for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from use of the information contained in this work. Readers are encouraged to confirm the information contained herein with other sources. For example and in particular, readers are advised to check the prod- uct information sheet included in the package of each drug they plan to administer to be certain that the information contained in this work is accurate and that changes have not been made in the recommended dose or in the contraindications for administration. This recommendation is of particular importance in connection with new or infrequently used drugs. Obstetrics and Gynecology PreTestTM Self-Assessment and Review Twelfth Edition Karen M. Schneider, MD Associate Professor Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences University of Texas Houston Medical School Houston, Texas Stephen K. Patrick, MD Residency Program Director Obstetrics and Gynecology The Methodist Health System Dallas Dallas, Texas New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Obi Data Abstraction Forms Demographics
    OBI DATA ABSTRACTION FORMS DEMOGRAPHICS Last Name: First Name: Patient MRN: Maternal Birthdate: Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latino / / Not Hispanic or Latino Race (select all that apply): Postal Zip Code: American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian Patient's Insurance Type: Black Medicaid Self Pay/None Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Private Other White ADMISSION Admission Date: Admission Time: Provider admitting patient to Labor & Delivery: / / Service/Practice patient admitted to: Admitting nurse: Certified Nurse Midwife Family Practice Gravidity on admission: Parity on admission: Maternal Fetal Medicine Obstetrics Physician Height at admission: Weight at admission: Pre-pregnancy weight: IN LBS LBS CM KG KG Did patient receive prenatal care? Date prenatal care started: Transfer of care from an intended home birth? Yes No Unable to determine / / Yes No MATERNAL COMORBIDITIES PRESENT ON ADMISSION Pre-pregnancy diabetes (Type I or Type II Yes Was the patient using opioids during this Yes diabetes diagnosed prior to this pregnancy) No pregnancy? No Gestational diabetes (diagnosis in this Yes What was the status of the patient's opioid use during this pregnancy with or without medication tx) No pregnancy? Select all that apply: Yes In treatment for opioid use disorder during pregnancy Pre-pregnancy hypertension (chronic) No Ongoing opioid/heroin use disorder (without current tx) Gestational hypertension (PIH, preeclampsia, Yes Opioid use for acute pain eclampsia, HELLP syndrome) No Opioid use for chronic pain Alcohol Use During Pregnancy?
    [Show full text]
  • Intrauterine Pressure Catheter Insertion External Cardiotogography
    Appendix 4 Fetal Surveillance – Intrauterine Pressure Catheter Insertion External Cardiotogography (CTG) provides an objective record of the frequency and duration of contractions however the tracing can be interrupted by maternal movement or difficult to capture due to maternal habitus. An intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) provides a quantifiable measure of uterine activity where clinically indicated. Indications for use For direct measurement of uterine contractions including: inability to monitor contractions well enough to assess timing of decelerations inability to monitor frequency of contractions as in the obese patient evaluation of contraction strength if patient’s labor process fails to progress. Requirements include the following: confirmed rupture of membranes (spontaneous or artificial) engaged vertex presenting part cervical dilatation of at least 1-2cm patient’s consent and ability to cooperate with sterile vaginal examination Contraindications Contraindications for use include the following: diagnosed or suspected placenta praevia undiagnosed vaginal bleeding non-rupture of amniotic membranes maternal infection (chorioamnionitis, active genital herpes, HIV) non-vertex fetal presentation any condition that precludes vaginal delivery Issues to Consider Potential complications for consideration infection postpartum endomyometritis uterine perforation umbilical core perforation CPP0487-Fetal Surveillance May 2019 cord entanglement extra-membranous catheter placement leading to complications (e.g. placental abruption, fetal distress, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and rarely anaphylactoid syndrome) Considerations To be discussed with the consultant on call and only inserted by senior registrar or consultant who is experienced in the procedure The intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) should not be left in situ for longer than 24 hours. Prior to attempting insertion the manufacturer’s product instructions should be read - different companies may have product insertion variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Uterine Activity
    Power and Passenger: Understanding Uterine Activity Michelle Flowers RNC-OB Emily Hamilton MDCM © 2017 PeriGen, Inc. Featuring Michelle Flowers, RNC-OB Program Manager Michelle Flowers serves as a PeriGen Program Manager & Clinical Consultant. Her 20+ year career also includes experience as a Clinical Quality Coordinator, Educator for obstetric services, and L&D charge nurse. Her more recent experience has focused on designing and executing OB documentation workflows and training programs. Her education credentials have included AWHONN Intermediate/Advanced Fetal Monitoring Instructor, ICEA Approved Trainer and Certified Childbirth Educator and AAP NRP Instructor. Featuring Emily Hamilton, MDCM Senior Vice President of Clinical Research An experienced obstetrician, Dr. Hamilton is currently an Adjunct Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at McGill University, as well as leading PeriGen’s clinical research team. Dr. Hamilton is the inventor of the PeriCALM advanced fetal monitoring system, holding 32 US and international patents for her research work. She is an internationally-known clinical thought leader on the use of technology to improve obstetric outcomes. She presents her research regularly at obstetric conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. Objectives 1. Review definitions related to uterine activity 2. Review etiology and physiology of uterine tachysystole 3. Analyze impact of UT on the fetal heart rate Uterine Contractions Quantified as the number of contractions in 10 minutes averaged over 30 minutes. • Uterine activity terminology used to assess and describe contractions: o Frequency – Beginning of contraction to beginning of next one o Duration – Length of contraction from beginning to end – Measured in seconds o Intensity – Strength of contraction – Assessed via palpation or mmHg (Montevideo units) o Resting Tone – Intrauterine pressure when uterus is not contracting – Assessed via palpation or mmHg Uterine Palpaon Palpation of uterine contractions is one of the key components of labor assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Labor
    Health Care Guideline Management of Labor How to cite this document: Creedon D, Akkerman D, Atwood L, Bates L, Harper C, Levin A, McCall C, Peterson D, Rose C, Setterlund L, Walkes B, Wingeier R. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Management of Labor. Updated March 2013. Copies of this ICSI Health Care Guideline may be distributed by any organization to the organization’s employees but, except as provided below, may not be distributed outside of the organization without the prior written consent of the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Inc. If the organization is a legally constituted medical group, the ICSI Health Care Guideline may be used by the medical group in any of the following ways: • copies may be provided to anyone involved in the medical group’s process for developing and implementing clinical guidelines; • the ICSI Health Care Guideline may be adopted or adapted for use within the medical group only, provided that ICSI receives appropriate attribution on all written or electronic documents and • copies may be provided to patients and the clinicians who manage their care, if the ICSI Health Care Guideline is incorporated into the medical group’s clinical guideline program. All other copyright rights in this ICSI Health Care Guideline are reserved by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement assumes no liability for any adap- tations or revisions or modifications made to this ICSI Health Care Guideline. www.icsi.org Copyright © 2013 by Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement Health Care Guideline and Order Set: Management of Labor 1 Pregnant patient > 20 Text in blue in this algorithm weeks with symptoms indicates a linked corresponding of labor Fifth Edition annotation.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Dystocia: Risk Factors and Consequences for Mother and Infant
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Publications from Karolinska Institutet Department of Medicine, Solna Clinical Epidemiology Unit Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Labour dystocia: Risk factors and consequences for mother and infant Anna Sandström Stockholm 2016 All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by AJ E-print AB © Anna Sandström, 2016 ISBN 978-91-7676-414-5 Department of Medicine, Solna Clinical Epidemiology Unit Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Labour dystocia: Risk factors and consequences for mother and infant THESIS FOR DOCTORAL DEGREE (Ph.D) To be publicly defended in Skandiasalen, Astrid Lindgrens Children’s Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna Friday October 14th, 2016 at 09.00 By Anna Sandström Principal Supervisor: Opponent: Olof Stephansson, Associate Professor Aaron B. Caughey, Professor Karolinska Institutet Oregon Health and Science University Department of Medicine, Solna Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Epidemiology Unit Examination Board: Co-supervisor: Ulf Högberg, Professor Sven Cnattingius, Professor Uppsala University Karolinska Institutet Department of Women’s and Children’s Health Department of Medicine, Solna Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Epidemiology Unit Karin Petersson, Associate Professor Karolinska Insitutet Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (Clintec) Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Ingela Rådestad, Professor Sophiahemmet University To my family Abstract Background: Labour dystocia (prolonged labour) occurs in the active first stage or in the second stage of labour. Dystocia affects approximately 21-37% of nulliparous, and 2-10% of parous women. The condition is associated with increased risks of maternal morbidities, instrumental vaginal deliveries and is the most common indication for a primary caesarean section.
    [Show full text]
  • Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia (1921–1996) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia (1921–1996) [1] By: Mandile, Olivia Keywords: Obstetrics [2] Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia studied fetal health in Uruguay during the second half of the twentieth century. Caldeyro-Barcia developed Montevideo units, which are used to quantify intrauterine pressure, or the force of contractions during labor. Intrauterine pressure is a useful measure of the progression of labor and the health of a fetus [3]. Caldeyro-Barcia’s research on fetal health often contradicted common obstetric practices, prompting him to publically challenge practices such as induction [4] of labor using oxytocin, forced pushing during labor, and birth position in which the woman lays on her back during labor. Caldeyro- Barcia’s methods of monitoring intrauterine pressure and development of Montevideo units furthered research in maternal and fetal health and improved the use of medical interventions during labor and delivery. Caldeyro-Barcia was born on 26 September 1921 in Montevideo, Uruguay. His mother, Elvira Barcia, came from a family with a medical background and his father, Joaquin Caldeyro, was a physician. Caldeyro-Barcia attended primary school at the English School in Montevideo, where he met fellow student Ofelia Stajano, whom he would later marry. As a teenager, Caldeyro-Barcia attended the Elbro Fernandez School in Montevideo, and began to court Stajano. In 1938, Caldeyro-Barcia entered the University of Uruguay’s Faculty of Medicine in Montevideo, where he studied medicine. During his time in school, Caldeyro-Barcia and Stajano became engaged. The couple married a year later in January 1946 and had six children, Ofelia, Lucia, Roberto, Carlos, Eduardo, and Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrauterine Migration of the Porcine Embryo
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF WILLIAM FREDERICK POPE for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ANIMAL SCIENCE (PHYSIOLOGY) presented on November 6, 1981 Title: INTRAUTERINE MIGRATION OF THE PORCINE EMBYRO Abstract appoved: Redacted for privacy Fredrick Stormshak The mechanism(s) involved with intrauterine migration of the por- cine embryo was investigated. Twenty-four gilts on Days 6, 9 and 12 of gestation (Day 0 = 1st day of estrus) were utilized to examine the relationship between myometrial activity and intrauterine migration. On Day 2, embryos were flushed from one oviduct and transferred to the opposite oviduct. Myometrial contractility increased concomitant with embryo migration through the uterus (day x side interaction, P<.10). Uterine flushings contained a short-acting component that mimicked, in part, the stimulatory influence(s) of the porcine embryo on myometrial activity. Furthermore, only flushings from the uterine segment con- taining the Day 12 embryos could overcome the inhibitory effects of indomethacin (P<.01) on myometrial activity. The porcine embryo coin- cubated with myometrial strips could not directly stimulate myometrial activity. The role of estradio1-17B (E2) and histamine in migration of the porcine embryo was examined. The involvement of E2in embryo migra- tion was examined by observing the distribution of silastic beads impregnated with cholesterol (five gilts) or E2 (five gilts) on Day 12 of the estrous cycle (after 5 days in utero). Beads impregnated with E2 migrated further (P<.05) than those impregnated with cholesterol. Twenty additional gilts and sows were assigned to four groups (n = 5) and were used to determine if histamine was involved with intrauterine migration.
    [Show full text]