DOCSLIB.ORG

Webless Migratory Game Bird Program Project Abstracts – 2010-11 Webless Migratory Game Bird Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Webless Migratory Game Bird Program Project Abstracts – 2010-11 Webless Migratory Game Bird Program U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Webless Migratory Game Bird Program Project Abstracts – 2010-11 Webless Migratory Game Bird Program Project Abstracts – 2010 and 2011 Compiled by Tom Cooper Project Officer U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Bird Management 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 950 Bloomington, MN 55437 July 2012 Suggested citation: Cooper, T. R. (Compiler). 2012. Webless Migratory Game Bird Program, Project Abstracts – 2010 and 2011. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomingtion, MN USA. 140p. The purpose of this report is to provide updated information on projects being funded through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Webless Migratory Game Bird Program. Any specific questions on projects should be addressed directly to the abstract authors. Cover photo by Todd Sanders, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, band-tailed pigeons visiting a mineral site station. CONTENTS Development and History of the Webless Program History and Administration of the Webless Migratory Game Bird Program, 1995-2012 1 David D. Dolton and Thomas R. Cooper Webless Migratory Game Bird Program Project Abstracts Mourning Doves Harvest and Crippling Rates of Mourning Doves in Missouri 6 John H. Schulz, Thomas W. Bonnot, Joshua J. Millspaugh, and Tony W. Mong Development of a Temporally and Spatially Explicit Model of Mourning Dove Recruitment for Harvest Mgmt. 8 David W. Miller Improving the Design and Count Methodology of the Mourning Dove Call-count Survey in the Eastern and Central Management Units: Pilot Study 12 Frank F. Rivera-Milàn, Mark Seamans, and Rebecca Rau White-winged Doves Development and Evaluation of a Parts Collection Survey for White-winge Doves in the Southeastern United States 16 Bret A. Collier, Brian L. Pierce, Corey Mason, Kyle Hand, and Taylor Jacobs Band-tailed Pigeons Band-tailed Pigeon Use of Supplemental Sodium and Calcium 21 Todd A. Sanders Sandhill Cranes Population Genetic Structure in the Eastern Population of Greater Sandhill Cranes 33 Mark E. Berres, Jeb A. Barzen, and Matthew A. Hayes An Initial Evaluation of the Annual Mid-Continent Sandhill Crane Population Survey 38 Aaron T. Pearse, Gary L. Krapu, and David A. Brandt Sandhill Crane Nest and Chick Survival in Nevada 42 Chad W. August, James S. Sedinger, and Christopher A. Nicolai The Use of Satellite Telemetry to Evaluate Migration Chronology and Breeding, Migratory, and Wintering Distribution of Eastern Population Sandhill Cranes 52 Dave Fronczak and David E. Andersen American Woodcock Habitat Use and Origins of American Woodcock Wintering in East Texas 59 Dan S. Sullins, Warren C. Conway, Christopher E. Comer, and David A. Haukos Assessment of Techniques for Evaluating American Woodcock Population Response to Best Management Practices Applied at the Demonstration-area Scale 67 Kyle O. Daly, David E. Andersen, and Wayne L. Brininger Jr. Factors Affecting Detection of American Woodcock on Singing-Ground Surveys 75 Stefanie M. Bergh and David E. Andersen Marshbirds The Effect of Waterfowl Impoundments on Sora and Virginia Rail Populations 85 Brian J. Olsen and Ellen P. Robertson Nesting, Brood Rearing, and Winter Habitat Selection of King Rails and Clapper Rails within the ACE Basin, South Carolina 92 William E. Mills, Ernie P. Wiggers, Catherine E. Ricketts, Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman, and Sara H. Schweitzer Evaluation of an Expert-based Landscape Suitability Model for King Rails in the Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Joint Venture Region 97 David G. Krementz and Jason R. Bolenbaugh Implementation of the National Marshbird Monitoring Program in Ohio 99 David E. Sherman and John W. Simpson Implementation of a National Marshbird Monitoring Program: Using Wisconsin as a Test of Program Study Design 103 Andy Paulios and Ryan Brady Estimating Population Trends, Relative Abundance, and Effects of Management Actions on 7 Species of Webless Migratory Game Birds 109 Courtney J. Conway, Leonard Santisteban, and Christopher P. Nadeau Expanding the Michigan Marsh Bird Survey to Facilitate Conservation at Multiple Scales 112 Michael J. Monfils and David L. Cuthrell Development of a Winter Survey for Wilson’s Snipe in the Mississippi Flyway 116 David G. Krementz and J. Matthew Carroll Developing Optimal Survey Techniques for Monitoring Population Status of Rails, Coots, and Gallinules 123 Courtney J. Conway, Mark Woodrey, Christopher Nadeau, and Meaghan Conway King Rail Nesting and Brood Rearing Ecology in Managed Wetlands 126 David G. Krementz and Karen L. Willard Appendices Appendix I. Projects Funded by the FY2012 Webless Migratory Game Bird Program 134 Appendix II. Summary of FWS Region 5 Projects Supported by the Webless Migratory Game Bird Program 136 HISTORY AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE WEBLESS MIGRATORY GAME BIRD PROGRAM, 1995-2012 THOMAS R. COOPER, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management, 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 950, Bloomington, MN 55437, USA ([email protected]) DAVID D. DOLTON (retired), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, PO Box 25486 DFC, Denver, CO 80225-0486, USA Introduction contracted to states: $50,000 was used directly by the The Webless Migratory Game Bird (WMGB) Program USFWS to support 2 field stations to study woodcock is an outgrowth of the WMGB Research Program and doves; and, $25,000 was retained by the USFWS (1994-present) and the WMGB Management Program to administer the program. The ARP ended when (2007-present). The revised WMGB Program was funding for the program was eliminated due to designed to provide cooperative funding for both USFWS budget constraints in 1982. In 1984, the research and management activities from the U.S. Fish International Association of Fish and Wildlife and Wildlife Service (USFWS), state wildlife Agencies (now AFWA) formed the Migratory Shore agencies, and other sources for projects benefitting the and Upland Game Bird (MSUGB) Subcommittee. 16 species of migratory game birds in North America One goal of the subcommittee was to reinstate a (Table 1). webless game bird research program. To accomplish this goal, the subcommittee documented the past Table 1. The 16 species of migratory shore and upland accomplishments of the ARP and lobbied for game birds eligible for funding through the Webless reinstatement of a webless research program. The Migratory Game Bird Program. efforts and persistence of the MSUGB Subcommittee came to fruition in the fall of 1994 when funding Common Name Scientific Name became available. The new program was titled the King Rail Rallus elegans WMGB Research Program. Projects were selected for Clapper Rail Rallus longirostris funding beginning in 1995 with funding being Virginia Rail Rallus limicola obligated for the entire project. Detailed information Sora Porzana carolina about the history of the ARP and WMGB Research Purple Gallinule Porphyrio martinica 1 Programs can be found in Dolton (2009). Common Gallinule Gallinula galeata American Coot Fulica americana The WMGB Research Program was funded at various Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis levels during 1995-2006; however, funding was Wilson’s Snipe Gallinago delicata suspended due to budget limitations in 2003 and 2004. American Woodcock Scolopax minor Funding was reinstated in 2005 at a level of Band-tailed Pigeon Patagioenas fasciata $250,000/year, with $30,000 of the total being Scaly-naped Pigeon Patagioenas squamosa obligated for webless projects in USFWS Region 5 Zenaida Dove Zenaida aurita (Northeast U.S.). In 2007, the USFWS received Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura additional funding for MSUGB work ($487,000/year). White-winged Dove Zenaida asiatica The primary purpose of the new funding was to White-tipped Dove Leptotila verreauxi address the management needs of MSUGB. From 1 2007-2009, funding was directed towards supporting Formerly Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) mourning dove banding in several states and other management related projects for woodcock, rails, and History sandhill cranes. The WMGB Program is an outgrowth of several funding initiatives, both past and present. The first Another key contribution made by the MSUGB effort was the Accelerated Research Program (1967- Committee was the publication of the book entitled 1982). Congressional funding of the ARP was Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Management $250,000 annually. Of this total, $175,000 was in North America (Tacha and Braun 1994). This was a 1 revised and updated version of the book edited by (1) mourning and white-winged doves, (2) hunted rails Sanderson (1977). Priority research and management and snipe, (3) sandhill cranes, (4) American activities identified in these books served as a tool for woodcock, and (5) American coots, purple gallinules, evaluating proposals submitted to the WMGB and common moorhens. The final workshop covering Research Program for funding. the remaining species (Zenaida doves, white-tipped doves, scaly-naped pigeons, and band-tailed pigeons) AFWA’s MSUGB Working Group (formerly MSUGB was completed in early 2011. The completed priority Subcommittee) provided key support in acquiring the information-need strategies are available on-line at: additional funding. Due to the addition of funding for www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/NewReportsPublications/Rese management-related projects (as opposed to research arch/WMGBMR/WMGBMR.html. only projects), cooperators made the decision to drop “research” from the title of the WMGB Program. These webless funding programs have proved to be invaluable in providing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scientific Support for Successful Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network
    Scientific support for successful implementation of the Natura 2000 network Focus Area B Guidance on the application of existing scientific approaches, methods, tools and knowledge for a better implementation of the Birds and Habitat Directives Environment FOCUS AREA B SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT FOR SUCCESSFUL i IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Imprint Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the European Commis- sion. The information and views set out in the handbook are Citation those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the Van der Sluis, T. & Schmidt, A.M. (2021). E-BIND Handbook (Part B): Scientific support for successful official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not implementation of the Natura 2000 network. Wageningen Environmental Research/ Ecologic Institute /Milieu guarantee the accuracy of the data included. The Commission Ltd. Wageningen, The Netherlands. or any person acting on the Commission’s behalf cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information Authors contained therein. Lead authors: This handbook has been prepared under a contract with the Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay (Monitoring of species and habitats within and beyond Natura 2000 sites) European Commission, in cooperation with relevant stakehold- Sander Mücher, Gerard Hazeu (Remote sensing techniques for the monitoring of Natura 2000 sites) ers. (EU Service contract Nr. 07.027740/2018/783031/ENV.D.3 Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay, Rene Henkens, Peter Verweij (Access to data and information) for evidence-based improvements in the Birds and Habitat Kris Decleer, Rienk-Jan Bijlsma (Guidance and tools for effective restoration measures for species and habitats) directives (BHD) implementation: systematic review and meta- Theo van der Sluis, Rob Jongman (Green Infrastructure and network coherence) analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Ixobrychus Exilis (Gmelin) Leastleast Bitternbittern, Page 1
    Ixobrychus exilis (Gmelin) Leastleast Bitternbittern, Page 1 State Distribution Best Survey Period Copyright The Otter Side Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State threatened state.” Wood (1951) identified the species as a summer resident and common in southern tiers of counties and Global and state rank: G5/S2 Cheboygan County, but rare and local in the Upper Peninsula. Least bittern was later described by Payne Family: Ardeidae – Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns (1983) as an uncommon transient and summer resident, with nesting confirmed in 27 counties. Michigan Total range: Five subspecies of least bittern are found Breeding Bird Atlas (Atlas) surveys conducted in the throughout much of North, Central, and South America 1980s confirmed breeding in 20 survey blocks in 17 (Gibbs et al. 1992). In North America, this species is counties (Adams 1991). All of these observations primarily restricted to the eastern U.S., ranging from occurred in the Lower Peninsula, with the number of the Great Plains states eastward to the Atlantic Coast blocks and counties with confirmed breeding nearly split and north to the Great Lakes region and the New between the northern (9 blocks in 8 counties) and England states (Evers 1994). Western populations are southern (11 blocks in 9 counties) Lower Peninsula concentrated in low-lying areas of the Central Valley (Adams 1991). Researchers confirmed nesting at and Modoc Plateau of California, the Klamath and several sites on Saginaw Bay and observed possible Malheur basins of Oregon, and along the Colorado breeding in Munuscong Bay wetlands (Chippewa River in southwest Arizona and southeast California County) during avian studies conducted in the mid- (Gibbs et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Birds, Index, 2000–2009
    WESTERN BIRDS, INDEX, 2000–2009 Volumes 31 (2000), 32 (2001), 33 (2002), 34 (2003), 35 (2004), 36 (2005), 37 (2006), 38 (2007), 39 (2008), and 40 (2009) Compiled by Daniel D. Gibson abeillei, Icterus bullockii—38:99 acadicus, Aegolius acadicus—36:30; 40:98 Accentor, Siberian—31:57; 36:38, 40, 50–51 Accipiter cooperii—31:218; 33:34–50; 34:66, 207; 35:83; 36:259; 37:215–227; 38:133; 39:202 gentilis—35:112; 39:194; 40:78, 128 striatus—32:101, 107; 33:18, 34–50; 34:66; 35:108–113; 36:196; 37:12, 215–227; 38:133; 40:78, 128 Acevedo, Marcos—32:see Arnaud, G. aciculatus, Agelaius phoeniceus—35:229 Acridotheres javanicus—34:123 Acrocephalus schoenobaenus—39:196 actia, Eremophila alpestris—36:228 Actitis hypoleucos—36:49 macularia—32:108, 145–166; 33:69–98, 134–174, 222–240; 34:68 macularius—35:62–70, 77–87, 186, 188, 194–195; 36:207; 37:1–7, 12, 34; 40:81 acuflavidus, Thalasseus sandvicensis—40:231 adastus, Empidonax traillii—32:37; 33:184; 34:125; 35:197; 39:8 Aechmophorus clarkii—34:62, 133–148; 36:144–145; 38:104, 126, 132 occidentalis—34:62, 133–148; 36:144, 145, 180; 37:34; 38:126; 40:58, 75, 132–133 occidentalis/clarkii—34:62 (sp.)—35:126–146 Aegolius acadicus—32:110; 34:72, 149–156; 35:176; 36:30, 303–309; 38:107, 115–116; 40:98 funereus—36:30; 40:98 Aeronautes montivagus—34:207 saxatalis—31:220; 34:73, 186–198, 199–203, 204–208, 209–215, 216–224, 245; 36:218; 37:29, 35, 149–155; 38:82, 134, 261–267 aestiva, Dendroica petechia—40:297 Aethia cristatella—36:29; 37:139–148, 197, 199, 210 psittacula—31:14; 33:1, 14; 34:163; 36:28; 37:95, 139,
    [Show full text]
  • American Bittern Bitterns Likely Declined Greatly in the Botaurus Lentiginosus Central Valley with the Dramatic Loss of Historical Wetlands
    CALIFORNIA RICE A California Riceland Success Story Numbers of both wintering and breeding American Bittern bitterns likely declined greatly in the Botaurus lentiginosus Central Valley with the dramatic loss of historical wetlands. The species has since adapted to the large expansion of rice cultivation in the Sacramento Valley since World War II and subsequently its population size appears to have increased. Hopefully additional research will better determine American Bittern the bittern’s population size and how this Botaurus lentiginosus species benefits from rice cultivation. Current and past population data No estimates are available for the size of this species’ population or its densities in suitable habitat in California or the Central Valley. Limited data indicate that bittern populations in these regions have been relatively stable since the late 1960s. Information regarding each species’ benefit to rice growers No documented benefit, but it is possible that bitterns consume some invertebrate pests in rice fields. Species in focus Prepared by: www.calrice.org American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Appearance Size: 24 –33 in Weight: 13–18 oz water but sometimes over dry ground in struc- turally-comparable herbaceous cover in uplands A medium-sized heron with a compact body and surrounding a wetland basin. Birds foraging in neck and relatively short legs. Plumage mainly rice fields likely nest in denser and taller vegetation brown above, with flecks or streaks of black, in nearby canals or weedy upland fields. buff, and cream color, and heavily streaked with brown, white, and buff below. Brown crown, Food/feeding and black streak from below eyes down side of A solitary feeder that relies more on stealth and neck (lacking in young birds).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Birds in Palo Verde National Park, Costa Rica
    http://www.nicoyapeninsula.com/paloverde/paloverdebirdlist.html Page 1 of 8 List of Birds in Palo Verde National Park, Costa Rica SPECIES English Spanish TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Crypturellus cinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou Tinamú Canelo PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptus dominicus Least Grebe Zambullidor Enano Podilymbus podiceps Pied-billed Grebe Zambullidor Piquipinto PELECANIFORMES PHALACROCORACIDAE Phalacrocorax brasilianus Neotropic Cormorant Cormorán Neotropical ANHINGIDAE Anhinga anhinga Anhinga Pato Aguja FREGATIDAE Fregata magnificens Magnificent Frigatebird Rabihorcado Magno CICONIIFORMES ARDEIDAE Botaurus pinnatus Pinnated Bittern Avetoro Neotropical Ixobrychus exilis Least Bittern Avetorillo Pantanero Tigrisoma mexicanum Bare-throated Tiger-Heron Garza-Tigre Cuellinuda Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Garzón Azulado Ardea alba Great Egret Garceta Grande Egretta thula Snowy Egret Garceta Nivosa Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron Garceta Azul Egretta tricolor Tricolored Heron Garceta Tricolor Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Garcilla Bueyera Butorides virescens Green Heron Garcilla Verde Nycticorax nycticorax Black-crowned Night-Heron Martinete Coroninegro Nyctanassa violacea Yellow-crowned Night-Heron Martinete Cabecipinto Cochlearius cochlearius Boat-billed Heron Pico-Cuchara THRESKIORNITHIDAE Threskiornithinae Eudocimus albus White Ibis Ibis Blanco Plegadis falcinellus Glossy Ibis Ibis Morito Plataleinae Platalea ajaja Roseate Spoonbill Espátula Rosada CICONIIDAE Jabiru mycteria Jabiru Jabirú Mycteria americana Wood Stork Cigueñon
    [Show full text]
  • American Bittern Botaurus Lentiginosus
    American bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Kingdom: Animalia Division/Phylum: Chordata Class: Aves Order: Pelecaniformes Family: Ardeidae ILLINOIS STATUS endangered, native FEATURES An adult American bittern is about 23 inches long. This brown heron has a black stripe on its neck. The underside of the outer wing is black. This bird has green legs. Both sexes are similar in appearance. The American bittern is an uncommon summer resident in Illinois. It winters in the southeastern coastal regions of the United States. BEHAVIORS The American bittern lives around marshes, wet prairies, wet woodlands and lakes. This bird eats mainly frogs. It stands with its bill pointed upward when alarmed. This is a secretive bird that hides in vegetation and is active mostly at night. It seldom sits in a tree. The call of the American bittern is "oong-ka-choonk, oong-ka-choonk." Migration occurs at night. Like the other herons, its neck is held in an "s" formation during flight with its legs trailing straight out behind its body. Breeding occurs in wet prairies, sloughs and marshes. The nest is placed on the ground or on a platform of vegetation. Two to six brown or olive eggs are laid during the nesting period of May through June. The endangered status is mainly due to the destruction and degradation of wetland habitats. Nests are widely scattered (partly due to the available habitat), which may contribute to its low numbers. HABITATS Aquatic Habitats bottomland forests; lakes, ponds and reservoirs; marshes; wet prairies and fens Woodland Habitats bottomland forests; Prairie and Edge Habitats none © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Action Plans for Eight Priority Bird Species
    Bittern (Botaurus stellaris) European Union Action Plans for 8 Priority Birds Species – Bittern European Union Action Plan for Bittern (Botaurus stellaris) Compiled by: Peter Newbery (RSPB, UK) Norbert Schäffer (RSPB/BirdLife International, UK) Ken Smith (RSPB, UK) with contributions from: Tom den Boer (Vogelbescherming Nederland, The Netherlands) Przemyslaw Chylarecki (Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland) Andreas von Lindeiner (Landesbund für Vogelschutz in Bayern, Germany) Jean-Laurent Lucchesi (Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, France) Erwin Nemeth (BirdLife Österreich-Gesellschaft für Vogelkunde, Austria) Luca Puglisi (Dip. Scienze del Comportamento Animale e dell'Uomo, Italy) Additional information was provided by: Lars Broberg (Sweden) Alison Duncan (Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux, France) Birgit Gödert-Jacoby (Lëtzebuerger Natur - a Vulleschutzliga, Luxembourg) Deborah Harrison (RSPB, UK) Borja Heredia (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Spain) Pertti Koskimies (Helsinki Zoological Museum, Finland) Richard Lansdown (Ardeola Environmental Services, Sweden) Jesper Madsen (Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Denmark) Francisco Moreira (Liga para a Protecçao da Natureza, Protugal) Costas Papaconstantinou (Hellenic Ornithological Society, Greece) Laurence Rose (RSPB, UK) Zoltan Waliczky (BirdLife International, UK) Marcus Walsh (BirdLife Suomi-Finland, Finland) Johanna Winkelman (Vogelbescherming Nederland, The Netherlands) Milestones in production of action plan Workshop: 16-18 April 1996 (Hilpoltstein, Bavaria) First draft: May 1996 Second draft: August 1996 Final draft: September 1999 Reviews This action plan will be monitored annually by the compilers and reviewed every five years (first review due 2001). Geographical scope This plan is intended for implementation by conservation organisations and others within the whole of the EU, although it is recognised that the Bittern does not currently breed in all member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Birds of the Italian Middle Ages: Diet, Environment and Society
    This is a repository copy of Wild birds of the Italian Middle Ages: diet, environment and society. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/136801/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Corbino, C.A. and Albarella, U. orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-0532 (2018) Wild birds of the Italian Middle Ages: diet, environment and society. Environmental Archaeology. ISSN 1461-4103 https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2018.1516371 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Environmental Archaeology on 03/09/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14614103.2018.1516371 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Wild birds of the Italian Middle Ages: diet, environment and society Wild birds are intrinsically associated with our perception of the Middle Ages. They often feature in heraldic designs, paintings, and books of hours; few human activities typify the medieval period better than falconry.
    [Show full text]
  • Botaurus Pinnatus (Pinnated Bittern)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Behaviour Botaurus pinnatus (Pinnated Bittern) Family: Ardeidae (Herons, Egrets and Bitterns) Order: Pelecanifermes Class: Aves (Birds) Fig. 1. Pinnated bittern, Botaurus pinnatus. https://neotropical.birds.cornell.edu/Species-Account/nb/species/pinbit1/overview TRAITS. Pinnated bitterns, also referred to as South American bitterns, are generally brown, large (60 – 80 cm), and cryptically patterned; they have yellow eyes and lores, and yellowish/yellow-olive legs (Howell and Webb, 1995). Their feathers are intricately variegated with colours of yellow, black, brown, and buff in an array of cryptic patterns of bars and streaks (Campbell and Lack, 2010). They have a dark brown forecrown; the hindcrown, as well as the sides and back of the neck, is buff (pale yellow-brown) in colour with fine, black bars; the other upper parts of their bodies are buff-streaked and striated in blackish colours; their flight feathers are black with brownish tips (seen as a band on the rear end of the wing during flight); their throats are white but have white to buff coloured underparts and forenecks with light brown streaks (Hilty and Brown, 1986). They have strong, pointed bills; long, slender toes (with the middle one being pectinated), and are generally at least 370 g in weight. Both males and females are similar in appearance although the females may be more streaked on their upper parts (Campbell and Lack, 2010). ECOLOGY. The pinnated bittern is a marsh bird, occurring mainly in temperate zones, breeding and feeding in wetlands among areas with scattered low shrubs and tall grass (Campbell and Lack, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Records of Pinnated Bittern Botaurus Pinnatus in Bolivia
    Cotinga29-080304.qxp 3/4/2008 10:51 AM Page 164 Cotinga 29 Recent records of Pinnated Bittern Botaurus pinnatus in Bolivia Oswaldo Maillard Z. and Steffen Reichle Received 5 November 2005; final revision accepted 19 November 2007 Cotinga 29 (2008): 164–166 Botaurus pinnatus es una especie poco conocida a lo largo de todo su rango de distribución desde México hasta Argentina, y en Trinidad. Hasta 1996 fue desconocida en Bolivia. Desde entonces ha sido observada varias veces en las sabanas estacionalmente inundadas del departamento de Santa Cruz y una vez en el departamento de Beni. Aquí resumimos estos registros y especulamos sobre el posible estatus de Botaurus pinnatus en Bolivia. Pinnated Bittern Botaurus pinnatus occurs in Flor de Oro, Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado shallow freshwater wetlands from Mexico to (13º22’S 61º00’W). Argentina, and in Trinidad6. Until as recently as On 11 December 2001 a Pinnated Bittern was 1996 it was unknown in Bolivia. Since then the found beside the unpaved road between San Rafael species has been recorded on several occasions in and San Matías, on the western edge of the the lowlands of dpto. Santa Cruz and once in dpto. Bolivian Pantanal (16°48’S 60°30’W). The bird was Beni. Here we summarise all known records and initially located in tall grasses but subsequently discuss its probable status. perched in short emergent vegetation in a small marsh. It was watched for c.1 hour during which it Records occasionally sang a deep, resonant, gulping song, Sightings are primarily listed in chronological transcribed as gu-gloo.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Brueghel the Elder: the Entry of the Animals Into Noah's
    GETTY MUSEUM STUDIES ON ART JAN BRUEGHEL THE ELDER The Entry of the Animals into Noah's Ark Arianne Faber Kolb THE J. PAUL GETTY MUSEUM, LOS ANGELES © 2005 J. Paul Getty Trust Library of Congress Cover and frontispiece: Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jan Brueghel the Elder (Flemish, Getty Publications 1568-1625), The Entry of the Animals 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 500 Kolb, Arianne Faber into Noah's Ark, 1613 [full painting Los Angeles, California 90049-1682 Jan Brueghel the Elder : The entry and detail]. Oil on panel, 54.6 x www.getty.edu of the animals into Noah's ark / 83.8 cm (21/2 x 33 in.). Los Angeles, Arianne Faber Kolb. J. Paul Getty Museum, 92.PB.82. Christopher Hudson, Publisher p. cm. — (Getty Museum Mark Greenberg, Editor in Chief studies on art) Page i: Includes bibliographical references Anthony van Dyck (Flemish, Mollie Holtman, Series Editor and index. 1599-1641) and an unknown Abby Sider, Copy Editor ISBN 0-89236-770-9 (pbk.) engraver, Portrait of Jan Brueghel Jeffrey Cohen, Designer 1. Brueghel, Jan 1568—1625. Noah's the Elder, before 1621. Etching and Suzanne Watson, Production ark (J. Paul Getty Museum) engraving, second state, 24.9 x Coordinator 2. Noah's ark in art. 3. Painting— 15.8 cm (9% x 6/4 in.). Amsterdam, Christopher Foster, Lou Meluso, California—Los Angeles. Rijksmuseum, Rijksprentenkabinet, Charles Passela, Jack Ross, 4. J. Paul Getty Museum. I. Title. RP-P-OP-II.II3. Photographers II. Series. ND673.B72A7 2004 Typesetting by Diane Franco 759.9493 dc22 Printed in China by Imago 2005014758 All photographs are copyrighted by the issuing institutions, unless other- wise indicated.
    [Show full text]