The SPS Annual Report and Accounts 1999-2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The SPS Annual Report and Accounts 1999-2000 The Scottish Prison Service Annual Report and Accounts 1999- 2000 Presented in Parliament in pursuance of the Prisons (Scotland) Act 1989 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 July 2000 Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers July 2000 HC 619 SE/2000/1 CONTENTS Previous Reports Location of Establishments Mission Statement Chief Executive's Foreword Performance Against 1999-2000 Targets Honours and Commendations HM Prison, Aberdeen HM Prison, Barlinnie HM Prison, Castle Huntly HM Prison and Young Offenders Institution, Cornton Vale HM Prison and Young Offenders Institution, Dumfries HM Prison, Dungavel HM Prison, Edinburgh HM Prison, Friarton HM Prison and Young Offenders Institution, Glenochil HM Prison, Greenock HM Prison, Inverness HM Prison, Longriggend HM Prison, Low Moss HM Prison, Noranside HM Prison, Penninghame HM Prison, Perth HM Prison, Peterhead HM Prison, Peterhead Unit HM Young Offenders Institution, Polmont HM Prison, Shotts HM Prison, Shotts Unit HM Prison, Shotts: National Induction Centre Strategy and Corporate Affairs Directorate Human Resources Directorate Custody Directorate Regimes Development Directorate Estates Directorate Finance and Information Systems Directorate APPENDICES 1. Information on performance against key Ministerial targets and milestones 2. Establishments: population, 1999-2000 3. Average daily population in establishments by type of custody 4. Receptions to penal establishments by type of custody 5. Breaches of discipline committed and punishments awarded in establishments, 1999-2000 6. Prison Industries 7. Staff complement and recruitment figures at 31 March 2000 8. Training days provided by the SPS College 9. Escapes and absconds from custody for the year ended 31 March 2000 10. Prisoners' complaints raised 1 April 1999-31 March 2000 11. Parliamentary Accountability: year ended 31 March 2000 12. Mandatory Drug Testing Results 13. Accounts The information contained on this WWW site is Crown Copyright but may be reproduced without formal permission or charge for personal or in-house use. © 2000 The Scottish Prison Service Annual Report and Accounts 1999-2000 PREVIOUS REPORTS 1970 Cmnd 4809 1971 Cmnd 4999 1972 Cmnd 5349 1973 Cmnd 5735 1974 Cmnd 6350 1975 Cmnd 6546 1976 Cmnd 716 1977 Cmnd 7391 1978 Cmnd 7749 1979 Cmnd 8037 1980 Cmnd 8421 1981 Cmnd 8618 1982 Cmnd 8980 1983 Cmnd 9400 1984 Cmnd 9670 1985 Cm 1 1986 Cm 223 1987 Cm 551 1988 - 1989 Cm 998 1989 - 1990 Cm 1499 1990 - 1991 Cm 1663 1991 - 1992 Cm 2143 1992 - 1993 Cm 2323 1993 - 1994 HC 515 1994 - 1995 HC 593 1995 - 1996 HC 508 1996 - 1997 HC 18 1997 - 1998 HC 808 1998 - 1999 HC 638 1998 - 1999 Annual Report The Scottish Prison Service Annual Report and Accounts 1999-2000 LOCATION OF ESTABLISHMENTS The Scottish Prison Service Annual Report and Accounts 1999-2000 PERFORMANCE AGAINST 1999-2000 TARGETS As an Executive Agency of the Scottish Executive, the Scottish Prison Service is set targets annually by the Scottish Ministers under each of the performance measures set out in its Agency Framework Document (April 1993). The targets cover the 4 arms of the SPS Mission Statement (Custody, Good order, Care and Opportunities) and value for money. Setting targets for any prison service is difficult. The public rightly expect prisoners to be kept in secure custody, but maintaining good order in prisons and preparing prisoners' reintegration into society depend on balancing security requirements against the provision of regimes which will help prisoners to address their offending behaviour and prepare for release. For example, the conditions of security which would eliminate the possibility of an escape or abscond - if such were attainable in any circumstances - would militate against the provision of meaningful programmes aimed at reducing reoffending and would severely restrict prisoners' access to purposeful activity of various kinds. The tightest security has therefore to be focused on those prisoners who are the greatest danger to the public. For the Scottish Prison Service, consistently high prisoner population levels make the fulfilment of targets a particular challenge. High prisoner numbers are not simply an accommodation issue. They put pressures on services within prisons and on staff and stretch the resources available for the provision of work and other purposeful activities. In 1999-2000 performance against custody targets was very good, with all targets being met and those for Category B and C prisoners being exceeded. There was particular success in delivery of the targets for good order, with the number of assaults on staff being below target for the first time in 4 years, and the number of assaults on prisoners showing a decrease of 29%, thus significantly bettering the target. There were 890 completions of programmes against a target of 850, and cost per prisoner place was also within the target. Minor construction delays and the closure of an establishment meant that the target of 76% of prisoner places with access to night sanitation was missed (outturn was 75%). The level of staff absence also exceeded the target. SPS PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND KEY TARGETS Performance Measures Key Targets Actual Performance 1. The number of prisoners (a) No category A prisoners (a) Target met. There were unlawfully at large. should escape. no such escapes. (b) The number of escapes (b) Target met. There were 2 by category B prisoners such escapes. should be no higher than 0.8 per 1,000 prisoners (5). (c) The number of escapes (c) Target met. There were 3 by category C prisoners such escapes. should be no higher than 1.3 per 1,000 prisoners (8). 2. The number of serious (a) The number of serious (a) Target met. There were assaults on staff and assaults on staff should be no 14 such assaults. prisoners. higher than 2.8 per 1,000 staff (15). (b) The number of serious (b) Target met. There were assaults on other prisoners 92 assaults recorded. should be less than the 1998- 99 outturn (129). 3. Basic quality of life for By end of March 2000, 76% Target not met. 75% of prisoners. of available prisoner places available prisoner places had will have access to night access to night sanitation. sanitation. 4. The amount of available To ensure that during 1999- Target met. 890 prisoners opportunities for prisoners' 2000 850 prisoners complete completed programmes. self-development. a programme to address their offending behaviour. 5. Average annual cost per To keep costs within £28,761 Target met. The actual prisoner place. per place available for use. average cost was £28,375. 6. The level of absence To reduce the average Target not met. The number through staff sickness. number of days lost per of days lost per person was person per year through 16. staff sickness to 14. HONOURS Queen's Birthday 1999 MBE: Mrs Helen Livingstone, Chairman of Glenochil Visiting Committee New Year 2000 OBE: Mr George Taylor, former Governor-in-Charge, HM YOI, Dumfries MBE: Mr Ronald Beasley, Vice Chairman, Visiting Committee, HM YOI, Polmont MBE: Mrs Marjory Russell, JP, Chairperson, Visiting Committee, HMP & YOI Cornton Vale Butler Trust Achievement Awards Scott Mclellan, Staff Training Manager, HMP & YOI Polmont, received an Achievement Award in recognition of his contribution to the culture change which has taken place at Polmont and to Polmont achieving Investors in People accreditation. Carol Maltman, Residential Officer, HMP & YOI Cornton Vale, received an Achievement Award in recognition of her involvement in the establishment of a craft and design workshop for vulnerable women prisoners at HMP Cornton Vale. Certificate Awards John Farrell and David Cooper, HMP Noranside, received Certificates in recognition of their work in the Vermiculture project at HMP Noranside. The project involved the feeding of waste products to a breed of worms, which in turn produced a bi-product that made compost. Their involvement in the project also encouraged liaison with local schools and interest groups, promoting a greater understanding of the environmental factors involved. Jackie Whyte, Social Worker, HM YOI Polmont, received a Certificate in recognition of her contribution in the development and promotion of a highly innovative Sex Offenders' Programme, which involved a unique 3-way multi-agency working role. COMMENDATIONS Chief Executive's Certificates of Meritorious Conduct Awarded to: Officer Paul Simmons and Officer Gavin Cochrane, HM YOI Polmont, who rescued a prisoner from a fire in his cell and administered first aid. Officer John Grant, HM YOI Polmont, who prevented a prisoner committing suicide. Officer Jerry McGuire and Officer Ross Paton, HM YOI Polmont, who prevented a prisoner committing suicide. Supervisor Graham Sneddon, Officer Gavin Cochrane and Officer Thomas Thomson, HM YOI Polmont, who rescued a prisoner from a cell fire and subsequently found a knife. Officer Bruce Drummond, Officer Grant Forrester and Officer Blair Paterson, HM YOI Polmont, who prevented a prisoner committing suicide. Officer Gillian Johnstone, HM YOI Polmont, who prevented a suicide attempt by a prisoner. Officer James Burnett and Officer Stephen Callaghan, HMP Longriggend, who prevented a prisoner committing suicide and administered first aid. Officer Alan Munro, HMP & YOI Cornton Vale, who prevented a suicide attempt by a prisoner. Officer Anthony Brown, HMP & YOI Cornton Vale, who dealt with a life threatening condition resulting from a drugs overdose. Officer Allan Reford and Officer Paul Burns, HMP Greenock, who prevented a prisoner committing suicide. Officer Gordon Davis, HMP Greenock who prevented a prisoner committing suicide. Officer Colin Mitchell, Officer Michael Vincent and Officer John McLaren, HMP & YOI Glenochil, who rescued a prisoner from a cell fire. Officer Craig Mitchell, Officer Thomas Murray and Officer Robin Stewart, HMP Perth, who rescued a prisoner from a cell fire. Governor's Commendation for Meritorious Conduct awarded to: Nurse Charles Johnston, Officer Stephen Boyle and Officer Kevin Anderson, HM YOI Polmont, who assisted in the prevention of a suicide attempt by a prisoner.
Recommended publications
  • Scottish Criminal Justice System: the Prison Service
    SPICe Briefing Pàipear-ullachaidh SPICe Scottish Criminal Justice System: The Prison Service Frazer McCallum This subject profile outlines the operation of prisons and young offender institutions in Scotland. 13 June 2021 SB 21-33 Scottish Criminal Justice System: The Prison Service, SB 21-33 Contents Introduction ____________________________________________________________3 Scottish Prison Service __________________________________________________4 Prisoners ______________________________________________________________5 Types of prisoner _______________________________________________________5 Prison population: total, sentenced and remand _______________________________5 Prison population: female ________________________________________________7 Prison population: under 21_______________________________________________8 Prison estate ___________________________________________________________9 Current prison estate ____________________________________________________9 Development of the prison estate _________________________________________10 Prison life _____________________________________________________________12 Purposeful activity _____________________________________________________12 Contact with family and friends ___________________________________________13 Release of prisoners ____________________________________________________14 Early release _________________________________________________________14 Home detention curfew _________________________________________________15 Transition to the community______________________________________________16
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Education in England and Wales. (2Nd Revised Edition)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 388 842 CE 070 238 AUTHOR Ripley, Paul TITLE Prison Education in England and Wales. (2nd Revised Edition). Mendip Papers MP 022. INSTITUTION Staff Coll., Bristol (England). PUB DATE 93 NOTE 30p. AVAILABLE FROMStaff College, Coombe Lodge, Blagdon, Bristol BS18 6RG, England, United Kingdom (2.50 British pounds). PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Correctional Education; *Correctional Institutions; Correctional Rehabilitation; Criminals; *Educational History; Foreign Countries; Postsecondary Education; Prisoners; Prison Libraries; Rehabilitation Programs; Secondary Education; Vocational Rehabilitation IDENTIFIERS *England; *Wales ABSTRACT In response to prison disturbances in England and Wales in the late 1980s, the education program for prisoners was improved and more prisoners were given access to educational services. Although education is a relatively new phenomenon in the English and Welsh penal system, by the 20th century, education had become an integral part of prison life. It served partly as a control mechanism and partly for more altruistic needs. Until 1993 the management and delivery of education and training in prisons was carried out by local education authority staff. Since that time, the education responsibility has been contracted out to organizations such as the Staff College, other universities, and private training organizations. Various policy implications were resolved in order to allow these organizations to provide prison education. Today, prison education programs are probably the most comprehensive of any found in the country. They may range from literacy education to postgraduate study, with students ranging in age from 15 to over 65. The curriculum focuses on social and life skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Throughcare Strategy the SPS Strategic Approach to Throughcare Support Services
    Throughcare Strategy The SPS strategic approach to Throughcare Support Services Published by SPS Strategy, Planning and Partnerships Division STRATEGY & INNOVATION DIRECTORATE January 2018 Unlocking Potential, Transforming Lives Directorate Owners: Strategy & Innovation Directorate Scope: This strategy applies to service users, their families and partners of the Scottish Prison Service. Approved by: Purposeful Activity Programme Board Effective date: February 2018 Review Date: February 2020 Contents 1.0 Foreword ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 2.0 Themes ......................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SPS Throughcare Vision ……………………………………………………………………….3 4.0 Objectives and Outcomes………………………………………………………………… …3-4 5.0 Scope………………………………………………………………………………………….....5 6.0 Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 5 7.0 Purpose………………………………………………………………………………………. 6-7 8.0 Professionalism ........................................................................................................................ 8-9 9.0 Partnership ............................................................................................................................ 10-12 10.0 Governance ................................................................................................................................. 13 11.0 Further Information .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Settled in Court
    SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI Settled in Court? SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI An Inspection of SWSI SWSI SWSI Social Work Services at SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI Four Sheriff Courts SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SOCIAL WORK SERVICES INSPECTORATE SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI 2001 SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI SWSI Settled in Court? An Inspection of Social Work Services at Four Sheriff Courts SOCIAL WORK SERVICES INSPECTORATE 2001 The Social Work Services Inspectorate Saughton House Broomhouse Drive Edinburgh EH11 3XD CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background Purposes 1 Method 2 Chapter 1: Services at Court 4 Service Arrangements – Brief Description 4 Arbroath Sheriff Court 4 Glasgow Sheriff Court 5 Hamilton Sheriff Court 7 Dumbarton Sheriff Court 8 Chapter 2: Key Themes 9 Post- Sentence Interviews 10 Serving Prisoners 12 Suggestions 13 Priorities 13 Views of Staff in Prisons 14 Interviewing offenders at court after they have been sentenced to a community disposal 15 Quality Assurance 16 Purpose and Role of Social Work Services at Court 18 Appropriate Skill-Mix for Staff 21 Information Transmission at Court 22 District Courts 24 Chapter 3: Conclusions and Recommendations 26 Annexes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SPS an Rep Mock-Up Final
    committed to corr e c t committed to correctional excellence Annual Report & Accounts 2001-02 Scottish Prison Service Annual Report & Accounts 2001-02 Presented to the Scottish Parliament in pursuance of the Prisons (Scotland) Act 1989 Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers 11 July 2002 SE/2002/178 Edinburgh: The Stationery Office £13.80 PreviousPrevious ReportsReports 1970Cmnd 4809 1971 Cmnd 4999 1972 Cmnd 5349 1973 Cmnd 5735 1974 Cmnd 6350 1975 Cmnd 6546 1976 Cmnd 7162 1977 Cmnd 7391 1978 Cmnd 7749 1979 Cmnd 8037 1980Cmnd 8421 1981 Cmnd 8618 1982 Cmnd 8980 1983 Cmnd 9400 1984 Cmnd 9670 1985 Cm 1 1986 Cm 223 1987 Cm 551 1988 – 1989 Cm 998 1989 – 1990Cm 1499 1990– 1991 Cm 1663 1991 – 1992 Cm 2143 1992 – 1993 Cm 2323 1993 – 1994 HC 515 1994 – 1995 HC 593 1995 – 1996 HC 508 1996 – 1997 HC 18 1997 – 1998 HC 808 1998 – 1999 HC 638 1999 – 2000 HC 619 - SE/2000/1 2000 – 2001 SE/2001/280 ISBN 0 10 888071 0 2 Scottish Prison Service Annual Report & Accounts 2001-02 ContentsContents Vision and Mission Statement 4 The Scottish Prison Service Board 5 Foreword 6 SPS Key Results 7 Leaders in Prison Correctional Work 10 Highest Standards of Service 22 Scottish Prisons’ Staff 24 An Estate Fit for Purpose 28 Value for Money 30 A year in the Scottish Prison Service 32 AppendicesAppendices 1. Location of Establishments 34 2. Establishments: Population, 2001-02 35 3. Average Daily Population in Establishments 36 4. Receptions to Penal Establishments 36 5. Escapes and Absconds from Custody 37 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Information for Families and Visitors
    COVID-19 INFORMATION FOR FAMILIES AND VISITORS COVID-19 is impacting on all areas of life including those we care for in prisons. On Tuesday 24 March the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) made the difficult decision to suspend visits. We are prioritising working on ways in which we can continue to support and maintain family contact and appreciate your patience and understanding during what must be an anxious time. The SPS has introduced a Family Support Line, available on 0131 330 3888. This line will provide family and friends service information between 9am and 3pm each week day. Please note that we are unable to discuss the detail of personal issues relating to individuals, and as indicated below your main access should still be direct to establishments; however, should you have specific worries about a relative in prison and have been unable to make contact through the establishment we will ensure that your concerns are passed on. Answers to Frequently Asked Questions are outlined below which we hope you find useful. These will be regularly updated to reflect the current situation. 1. Can I visit someone in prison? At the moment all visits are suspended across the prison estate. Critical Agents visits will continue to be facilitated but, as our courts reduce their business, it is anticipated that the number of these visits will also reduce. 2. What is the situation regarding Home Leaves and other forms of community access? What about progression and Parole Hearings? All temporary absences, including Home Leave, Work Placements and Escorted Leave have been suspended.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheriffdom of South Strathclyde Dumfries and Galloway at Airdrie
    SHERIFFDOM OF SOUTH STRATHCLYDE DUMFRIES AND GALLOWAY AT AIRDRIE UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENT AND SUDDEN DEATHS INQUIRY (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 DETERMINATION OF SHERIFF T.S.MILLAR Following an inquiry into the death of CATHERINE THOMSON A Fatal Accident Inquiry into the death of Catherine Thomson has found that her death could have been avoided if an assessment of risk to the community had been carried out prior to the granting of short leave to John Campbell. Catherine Thomson died on the 22 August 2005 at 11 Fernleigh Place, Moodiesburn, Glasgow. The cause of death was a stab wound to the right side of the neck, penetrating the jugular vein, the main vein draining blood from the head. The stab wound, along with other injuries sustained by Catherine Thomson, were inflicted by John Campbell, a serving prisoner at H.M.Prison, Castle Huntley, while he was on a short leave and unsupervised. On 27th August 2002 he was sentenced to 8 years in prison on two charges of assault to severe injury and permanent disfigurement. That offence was committed shortly after his early release on licence from a previous prison sentence. The Inquiry was called by the Procurator Fiscal on the instructions of the Lord Advocate in terms of S.1(1) (b) of the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (Scotland) Act 1976 which provides for such an investigation to take place if the circumstances give rise to serious public concern. The Sheriff considered the evidence and submissions over a period of five days between the 3 rd and 24 th September 2007 at Airdrie Sheriff Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Criminal Justice System
    The Scottish Criminal Justice System Background The Act of Union 1707 between Scotland and England permitted Scotland to retain its separate legal system, which continued to be administered in Scotland. This meant that, even prior to devolution; the Scottish justice system had its own court system, its own police forces, its own prosecution service and its own prison and criminal justice social work services. The 1998 Scotland Act devolved a range of powers from Westminster to the reconvened Scottish Parliament, which included legislative powers to administer the Scottish legal system. Legislative powers over some areas, including terrorism and legal safeguards for human rights, remain reserved to the United Kingdom. In addition, the Supreme Court, which was established in October 2009, sits as a Scottish Court to hear appeals from civil cases arising in Scotland, and also hears criminal cases where human rights are at issue. However, in most cases, final appeals relating to criminal cases continue to be heard by Scottish courts (for more detail see Joyce, 2004 - book section available here). The 2008 Act also devolved executive powers to the Scottish Government. The Cabinet Secretary for Justice has overall responsibility for criminal justice in Scotland, which includes “the justice system, security, access to justice, criminal law and procedure, civil law, the police, the legal profession, courts, sentencing, prisons and prisoners, victims and witnesses, reducing reoffending, youth justice, criminal justice social work, community safety, fire and rescue services, anti-social behaviour, drugs policy, violence reduction, anti-sectarianism and liquor licensing” (Scottish Government website.) The Scottish Parliament is responsible for scrutinising the policy and legislative proposals of the Scottish Government, and the Justice Committee fulfils much of the scrutiny in relation to criminal justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison-Linked Time Banking
    1 A GUIDE TO ESTABLISHING A TIME BANK WITHIN A PRISON RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESEARCH EVIDENCE ON PRISON-LINKED TIME BANKS A. Tamaliunaite, August 2015 2 Agne Tamaliunaite, Research Intern, Stirlingshire Voluntary Enterprise E-mail: [email protected] Islay House South, 4 Livilands Lane, Stirling, FK8 2BG Website: http://www.sventerprise.org.uk/ Stirlingshire Voluntary Enterprise is registered as a Company Limited by Guarantee SC387876 and Registered Scottish Charity Number SC041875 Contents Introduction 3 Timebanking 4 Timebanking Values 5 Prison-linked Time Banking 7 Reducing Reoffending and Time Banking 9 Examples of Prison-linked Time Banks 17 HM Prison Cornton Vale Research Project 19 Setting up a Prison-linked Time Bank 29 Future Recommendations 32 Appendix 34 3 Introduction This guide is an outcome from a research project – a feasibility study on establishing a time bank within HMP & YOI Cornton Vale prison. Its aim is to introduce the readers to time banking and to inform the third sector about the possibilities of expanding time banks by making links with prisons. Throughout the chapters it will be suggested that volunteering through time banks can bring a lot of benefits not only to ordinary time banking members but to prisoners as well. The guide will evaluate how time banking can influence the rates of reoffending, if not directly, but by improving prisoners’ emotional well-being. In order to do so the available literature based on recidivism (a person's relapse into criminal behaviour) will be reviewed. A part of this document is dedicated to a HMP & YOI Cornton Vale Time Bank Feasibility Study which aimed to evaluate the feasibility of establishing a time bank within this institution.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018/19 Audit of the Scottish Prison Service Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body
    Published 20 February 2020 SP672 1st Report, 2020 (Session 5) Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee Comataidh Sgrùdadh Poblach agus Iar-reachdail The 2018/19 audit of the Scottish Prison Service Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. All documents are available on the Scottish For information on the Scottish Parliament contact Parliament website at: Public Information on: http://www.parliament.scot/abouttheparliament/ Telephone: 0131 348 5000 91279.aspx Textphone: 0800 092 7100 Email: [email protected] © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliament Corporate Body The Scottish Parliament's copyright policy can be found on the website — www.parliament.scot Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee The 2018/19 audit of the Scottish Prison Service, 1st Report, 2020 (Session 5) Contents Introduction ____________________________________________________________1 General findings and conclusions__________________________________________2 Key issues and evidence _________________________________________________4 SPS finances and prison population ________________________________________4 Costs of private prisons ________________________________________________5 Staffing _____________________________________________________________8 Sickness absence___________________________________________________8 Workforce issues and POPP payments _________________________________ 11 Prison estate _______________________________________________________14 Performance________________________________________________________17
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Prison Service Infrastructure Commission for Scotland
    SCOTTISH PRISON SERVICE INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION FOR SCOTLAND Dundee Community Custody Unit Initial Call for Evidence - Submission May 2019 SEIRBHEIS PHRÌOSAIN NA H-ALBA 1 2 Contents: Section Page No 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 The Scottish Prison Service 3 3.0 Estate/Infrastructure Development Programme 4 4.0 Estate Development Programme (financial investment) 6 5.0 Maintenance 7 6.0 Challenges – Current and Future 8 7.0 Conclusion 8 Annex A 9 3 1.0 Itroduction This paper sets out details of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) infrastructure development programme intended to ensure that the prison estate is fit for purpose in terms of being able to support the delivery of a modern prison service and in discharging the duty to protect the public by keeping those who have been sentenced by the courts in safe and secure custody. It is aligned to the current National Performance Framework through contributing to ensuring communities are inclusive, empowered, resilient and safe. The paper details the work carried out to date as part of the development programme in upgrading/modernising the estate and the work which is planned to take place in improving facilities and opportunities for staff, visitors and those in the SPS care by ensuring prisons in Scotland are safe, healthy and positive places in which to live and work. 2.0 The Scottish Prison Service The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) is an agency of the Scottish Government and was established in April 1993. As an Executive Agency, the SPS is funded by the Scottish Government. There are 13 publicly managed prisons and two privately managed prisons (HMP Kilmarnock and HMP Addiewell).
    [Show full text]
  • 385 WEST V. SECRETARY of STATE for SCOTLAND Apr. 23
    s.c. WEST V. SECRETARY OF STAT E FOR SCOTLAND 385 WEST v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR SCOTLAND No. 33. FIRST DIVISION. Apr. 23, 1992. Lord Weir. WILLIAM LAURISTON WEST, Petitioner (Reclaimer). — Mackinnon. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR SCOTLAND (on behalf of the Scottish Prison Service), Respondent. — Clarke, Q.C., Reed. Administrative law—Practice—Judicial review — Competency — Prison officer refused discretionary reimbursement of removal expenses — Scope of supervisory jurisdiction of Court of Session—Whether exercise of discretion by Scottish Prison Service open to judicial review — Whether criteria for exercise of supervisory jurisdiction included requirement that "public law " element be present—Rules of Court 1965, rule 260B.1 The petitioner, a serving prison officer, was transferred from a young offenders institution to a prison. Under his conditions of service with his employers, the Scottish Prison Service, he was regarded as "mobile staff and liable to be transferred compulsorily to any prison service establishment in Scotland. Provision was made in the conditions of service for the reimbursement to staff of inter alia removal expenses. As a result of his transfer, the petitioner required to move house but was thereafter informed by his employers that his removal expenses would not be reimbursed. He then presented a petition to the Court of Session for judicial review of the prison service's decision, on the ground that the refusal was an unreasonable exercise of its discretion, for reduction of its decision, and declarator that he was entitled to reimbursement of his removal expenses and damages. The respondent, the Secretary of State for Scotland, lodged answers on behalf of the prison service, arguing that the petition was incompetent and irrelevant.
    [Show full text]