Rowland Onyenali CURBING RELIGIOUS CONFLICT THROUGH EDUCATION and RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Rowland Onyenali Abstract the Level of Inse
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rowland Onyenali CURBING RELIGIOUS CONFLICT THROUGH EDUCATION AND RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Rowland Onyenali Abstract The level of insecurity in Nigeria today is easily attributable to political instability. Insecurity has led to a spiral of killings and wanton destruction of life and property in both the public and private sectors in the country. However, this situation is a result of the utilization of religion for political gains. Boko Haram insurgency, with its agenda of enthronement of an Islamic rule based on the Sharia law, has added another ugly feather to the already bad blood between the religions in Nigeria. The concentration of religious violence in the areas predominated by apathy to Western Education during the formative years of Nigeria as a nation shows the connection between lack of education and the tendency to conflict. This paper discusses the importance of a thorough-going religious education of the youth in addressing this issue. Keywords: Education, Instability, Nigeria, Political Conflict, Religious Conflict, Religious Dialogue Introduction Even a cursory observer of the Nigerian project readily perceives that religious conflict has been a serious setback to the realization of genuine development in every sector of the country. And it seems that this would continue to be the state of affairs in the near future. Statistics show that conflict between Christians and Muslims has claimed many lives and rendered many people homeless while so many others have been maimed for life. Even when the issues at stake are purely political issues, politicians have utilized religion to foment trouble and score some heavy political points. This is despite the fact that both Islam and Christianity, the two major religions in the country, claim a lot in the realm of the promotion of peace and peaceful coexistence. Even though the major dividing issue in Nigeria is not the issue of religion, per se, it is evident that many of the conflicts which could be traced to ethnic differences, civil strife and minority nervousness have been given a religious garb because of the tremendous emotional attachment people naturally have to their religious beliefs. This has made Nigeria to rank high on the list of the most unstable nations in the world. The main reason why this is so is because, religious education in Nigeria has not been given an adequate consideration. A situation whereby religious education is relegated to the recitation of creeds and the learning of religious books by rote can only breed religious fundamentalism. This is the Nigerian situation. This paper, then, tries to see inter-religious education and dialogue between Christianity and Islam as a veritable tool to forestall constant conflict in Nigeria. It 1 SIST Journal of Religion and humanities, Vol. 1(2), 2021 argues that if religion is properly understood and the core tenets of Islam and Christianity rationally applied, there would be a lot of good will among members of these two religions. This, in turn, will affect the political sphere in a positive light and help in the transformation of the country from a theater of religious conflict to a haven of peace and development. It is a project that is possible and urgent. Understanding Religion We must first acknowledge the difficulty in defining the concept of religion. Many authors (For example Pollack, 1995, Porzelt, 2009, Ziebertz et al, 2012) have come to the conclusion that the difficulty in defining religion comes from the fact that religion has become common in usage and application. In his influential The Sociology of Religion, Weber(1993; 1) asserts that “to define ‘religion’ to say what it is, is not possible at the start of a presentation such as this. Definition can be attempted, if at all, only at the conclusion of the study.” At the end of his presentation, Weber fails to give a precise definition of religion. The fact that Weber did not return to the definition of religion at the end of his book shows that he must have seen the task as an impossible one. Perhaps the etymology of the word can help in its explanation. The term religion seems to come from three different Latin roots. The first root is relegere. It means the desire or diligence to live according to the demands of the gods. This seems to be the sense in which Cicero (106-43 B.C.) understood the term in his De naturadeorum. He uses it together with other terms such as pietas, sanctitas, fides, cultusdeorum, societas and iustitia (Hildebrandt & Brocker; 2008, 12). On the other hand, Lactantius (ca. 250-325 A.D.) derived religion from religare which implies tying oneself back to God. Finally, Aquinas (1225-1274 A.D.) derived the term from reeligere as a form of reelecting or rechoosing God. These considerations led Ziebertz (2003; 69) to conclude that whether we derive religion from religere, religare or reeligere “all three meanings refer to humankind specifically turning to something very special.” This turning to something very special means that it involves the ultimate desires of the human person. Hence, Long (1986; 7) concludes that “religion will mean orientation-orientation in the ultimate sense, that is, how one comes to terms with the ultimate significance of one’s place in the world.” This could mean that religion is the object of one’s orientation to reality. It is the “thing” that determines the way an individual sees and interprets nature. It deals with what concerns the individual ultimately more than any other things. This is another way of expressing the conclusion of Tillich (1959) that religion, in the largest and most basic sense of the word, is ultimate concern. Since religion is related to the ultimate concerns of the human person, it is then easy to appreciate the situation when religious people apply all their emotions to propagate their religious beliefs. Sometimes this application neglects the rational angle of the human person and feeds the emotional aspect. The fact that religion relates to the ultimate concern of the human person means that many people who 2 Rowland Onyenali identify with one religion or the other would stop at nothing in propagating their religious beliefs. In most cases, this has led to conflict of various dimensions. The history of Nigeria bears ample evidence of this. Nigeria and the History of Religious Conflict The fact that an average Nigerian is very religious is observed by many sources (for instance Olubayo, 2010; Ekundayo, 2013). Religion plays a critical role in the Nigerian society and has expressed itself as a potent force in the political development of the country. This force which could have been used to unite Nigerians is the same force that has led to numerous conflicts in the country. Nigeria has been engulfed in numerous religious crises or conflicts since its birth as a nation. Some of these religious conflicts normally dovetail into ethnic conflicts. Due to their tendency to spread into other areas after an early stage in one area, ethno-religious conflicts have gained notoriety as the most violent crises in Nigeria. Initially, most of these conflicts occur in the middle-belt and along the culturally borderline states of the predominantly Muslim North, and also take place between Hausa-Fulani groups and non-Muslim ethnic groups in the South (Osaghae &Suberu, 2005). In conflicts of this nature occurring along the convergence of ethnic and religious lines, it is often very difficult to tell the differences between religious and ethnic crises because the dividing line between them is always very thin. However, in recent times, there is hardly any part of the country that does not bear the mark of the injuries of ethno-religious conflict. It is easy to see how religion is an integral part of the identification of many Nigerians (Lewis & Bratton, 2000; Osaghae & Subery, 2005). In the findings of Ruby and Shah (2007), religion was a more binding force than ethnicity for many Nigerians. Osaghae and Subery (2005; 10) report that “in parts of the North commonly referred to as the ‘core’ or ‘Hausa-Fulani North’ - which is roughly coterminous with those states that adopted Sharia law in the Fourth Republic - religious identity is morecritical than ethnic identity and in fact serves to activate ethnicity.” Therefore, ethno-religious formations are the most important identity markers in Nigeria (Nsongola-Ntalaja, 2004). Although Nigerian Muslims are more likely to manifest a religious affiliation than Christians or adherents of ATR (Lewis & Bratton, 2000), any religious conflict between Christians and Muslims in Nigeria is likely going to concern almost every Nigerian. The central position of religion seems to be partly because of the religious nature of the Nigerians and partly because of the material gains that seem to accrue from belonging to some religious sects. One of the areas in which this material gain is most obvious is in the area of politics. In the Nigerian case, the words of Wellman(2007; 1) that “politics, power, coercion, and religion may be strange bedfellows but they are structurally linked,” make much sense. Religion has always played a very vital role, albeit a divisive one in the politics of Nigeria. And it is mainly due to the politicization of religion that religious conflicts have become rife in Nigeria. The use of religion as an instrument of politics has been acknowledged by Falola thus: 3 SIST Journal of Religion and humanities, Vol. 1(2), 2021 Since the mid-seventies, politicians have urged their followers to vote along religious lines- Muslims are told to vote Muslims, and Christians for Christians. In 1978, the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) told its followers in one of its strong Islamic northern constituencies that the two- fingered V-for-victory sign of the United Party of Nigeria (UPN) was a covert symbol of polytheism, an idea counter to fundamental Islamic doctrine.