No. 19-1414 In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER v. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, RESPONDENT __________ ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT __________ BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS, THE NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS, AND OTHER TRIBAL ORGANIZATIONS __________ JENNIFER H. WEDDLE Busby, MT 59016 Counsel of Record Phone: (406) 672-4779 TROY A. EID
[email protected] KYLE R. MONTOUR Greenberg Traurig, LLP DERRICK BEETSO 1144 15th St., Suite 3300 General Counsel Denver, CO 80202 National Congress of (303) 572-6500 American Indians
[email protected] Embassy of Tribal Nations DION KILLSBACK 1516 P Street NW Killsback Law PLLC Washington, DC 20005 Attorney at Law Phone: 202.630.0318 P.O. Box 294
[email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the lower courts erred in suppressing ev- idence on the theory that a police officer of an Indian tribe lacked authority to temporarily detain and search respondent, a non-Indian, on a public right-of- way within a reservation based on a potential viola- tion of state or federal law. ii RELATED PROCEEDINGS United States District Court (D. Mont.): United States v. Cooley, No. 16-cr-42-BLG-SPW, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17276 (D. Mont. Feb. 7, 2017). United States Court of Appeals (9th Cir.): United States v. Cooley, 919 F.3d 1135 (9th Cir. 2019)(petition for reh’g denied, United States v. Cooley, 947 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir.