DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects cover.qx4 26/6/98 9:34 AM Page 2 Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects D.F. Waterhouse Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects D.F. Waterhouse (ACIAR Consultant in Plant Protection) Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1998 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or deemed relevant to ACIARÕs research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World ©Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT 2601. Waterhouse, D.F. 1998, Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects. ACIAR Monograph No. 51, 548 pp + viii, 1 fig. 16 maps. ISBN 1 86320 221 8 Design and layout by Arawang Communication Group, Canberra Cover: Nezara viridula adult, egg rafts and hatching nymphs. Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne ii Contents Foreword vii 1 Abstract 1 2 Estimation of biological control prospects 2 3 Introduction 3 4 Target insect pests 9 4.1 Agrius convolvuli 9 Rating 10 Origin 10 Distribution 10 Biology 10 Host plants 11 Damage 11 Natural enemies 11 Attempts at classical biological control 14 Discussion 16 4.2 Anomis flava 17 Rating 18 Origin 18 Distribution 18 Biology 18 Host plants 19 Damage 19 Natural enemies 21 Attempts at classical biological control 27 Major natural enemies 31 Discussion 31 4.3 Aphis craccivora 33 Rating 34 Origin 34 Distribution 34 Biology 34 Host plants 35 Damage 35 Natural enemies 36 Comments 44 4.4 Aphis gossypii 45 Rating 46 Origin 46 Distribution 46 Biology 46 Host plants 47 Damage 47 iii Natural enemies 48 Attempts at biological control 60 The major parasitoid species 70 An aphid-specific predator 79 Comments 80 4.5 Cosmopolites sordidus 85 Rating 86 Origin 86 Distribution 86 Biology 87 Damage 88 Host plants 89 Natural enemies 89 Attempts at biological control 95 Biology of main natural enemies 103 Comments 104 4.6 Deanolis sublimbalis 105 Synonyms 106 Rating 106 Origin 106 Distribution 106 Biology 107 Host plants 108 Damage 109 Natural enemies 111 Comment 112 4.7 Diaphorina citri 113 Rating 114 Origin 114 Distribution 114 Biology 115 Host plants 116 Damage 116 Natural enemies 120 Attempts at biological control 127 Major natural enemies 131 Comments 133 4.8 Dysdercus cingulatus 135 Rating 136 Origin 136 Distribution 136 Biology 136 Host plants 137 Damage 137 Natural enemies 137 Comment 138 4.9 Dysmicoccus brevipes 141 Rating 142 Origin 142 Distribution 142 Taxonomy 142 iv Biology 143 Hosts 144 Damage 144 Natural enemies 145 Attempts at biological control 145 Major natural enemies 155 Comments 156 4.10 Hypothenemus hampei 157 Rating 158 Origin 158 Distribution 158 Biology 159 Host plants 163 Damage 164 Natural enemies 166 Attempts at biological control 170 Major parasite species 176 Comments 180 4.11 Leucinodes orbonalis 185 Rating 186 Origin 186 Distribution 186 Biology 187 Host plants 187 Damage 189 Natural enemies 189 Attempts at biological control 192 Major natural enemies 192 Comments 194 4.12 Nezara viridula 197 Rating 198 Origin 198 Distribution 198 Biology 199 Damage 199 Natural enemies 200 The role of pheromones and other chemical secretions 208 Attempts at biological control 209 Biology of the major species 228 Comments 233 4.13 Ophiomyia phaseoli 235 Rating 236 Origin 236 Distribution 236 Biology 237 Host plants 237 Damage 238 Natural enemies 239 Attempts at biological control 249 The more important parasitoids 251 Comment 255 v 4.14 Phyllocnistis citrella 257 Rating 258 Origin 258 Distribution 258 Biology 259 Host plants 262 Damage 263 Natural enemies 264 Attempts at biological control 279 Major natural enemies 282 Comment 285 4.15 Planococcus citri 287 Rating 288 Origin 288 Distribution 288 Biology 289 Host plants 289 Damage 290 Natural enemies 290 Attempts at biological control 296 Biology of important natural enemies 311 Comments 315 4.16 Trichoplusia ni 317 Rating 318 Origin 318 Distribution 318 Biology 318 Host plants 319 Damage 320 Natural enemies 320 Introductions for biological control of T. ni 334 Major parasitoid species 340 Comment 345 5 References 349 6 Index of scientific names of insects 477 7 General index 531 vi Foreword Since its inception in 1982, ACIAR has been a very strong supporter of classical biological control as a key element in the management of exotic arthropod and weed pests. When practiced with appropriate safeguards, it often provides a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to the growing use of pesticides, particularly when integrated, if necessary, with the use of resistant plant varieties and cultural controls. Classical biological control has been very successful in regions of the world (e.g. Australia, California, New Zealand, Oceania) where a large number of the major insect pests and weeds are exotic. This situation applies to a far lesser extent to Southeast Asia but, in a recent survey commissioned by ACIAR, Waterhouse (1993b) identified 40 major arthropod pests that merited evaluation as possible targets for biological control. Not all of these (e.g. the indigenous fruit flies) are attractive targets, but some at least are. The present volume is a companion to Biological Control of Weeds: Southeast Asian Prospects (Waterhouse 1994). It summarises what is known about the natural enemies (principally the parasitoids) of the major exotic insect pests and indicates prospects for their biological control. The aim has been to facilitate, for countries of the region, the selection of promising individual, or collaborative, priority insect pest targets. This should also provide donor agencies with a readily accessible overview of the regionÕs major exotic insect pest problems and with an evaluation, where possible, of prospects for their amelioration by introduction of natural enemies. This should assist in the selection, for support, of projects that are best suited to their individual terms of reference. R. Clements Director Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research vii Introduction 1 1 Abstract Biological control programs have been mounted in some region(s) of the world against 13 of the 16 dossier pests and substantial or partial success has been achieved in one or more countries for 8. On the basis of available information there are good to excellent prospects for reducing, in at least some parts of the region, the damage caused by the following: Leucinodes orbonalis, Nezara viridula, Ophiomyia phaseoli and Planococcus citri. There are also good reasons for believing that there will prove to be valuable natural enemies for the following: Agrius convolvuli, Anomis flava, Aphis craccivora, Aphis gossypii, Diaphorina citri, Dysmicoccus brevipes, Hypothenemus hampei, Phyllocnistis citrella and Trichoplusia ni. There seems to be little prospect for classical biological control of Dysdercus cingulatus, too little is known about Deanolis sublimbalis and the prospects for control of Cosmopolites sordidus are unclear, although its lack of pest status in Myanmar is puzzling. 2 Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects 2 Estimation of biological control prospects Insect Rating Family Any Attractiveness biological as a target in control SE Asia successes Agrius convolvuli 7 Sphingidae yes medium Anomis flava 10 Noctuidae yes low to medium Aphis craccivora 15 Aphididae ? medium Aphis gossypii 19 Aphididae yes medium Cosmopolites sordidus 13 Curculionidae ? uncertain Deanolis sublimbalis 3 Pyralidae no uncertain Diaphorina citri 8 Psyllidae yes medium Dysdercus cingulatus 11 Pyrrhocoridae no v. low Dysmicoccus brevipes 10 Pseudococcidae yes medium Hypothenemus hampeii 12 Scolytidae yes medium Leucinodes orbonalis 15 Pyralidae no medium to high Nezara viridula 10 Pentatomidae yes high Ophiomyia phaseoli 14 Agromyzidae yes high Phyllocnistis citrella 16 Phyllocnistidae yes medium Planococcus citri 7 Pseudococcidae yes high Trichoplusia ni 7 Noctuidae yes medium Introduction 3 3 Introduction Waterhouse (1993b) published information, collected from agricultural and weed experts in the 10 countries of Southeast Asia, on the distribution and importance of their major arthropod pests in agriculture. Ratings were supplied on the basis of a very simple system +++ very widespread and very important ++ widespread and important + important only locally P present, but not an important pest The advantages and limitations of this system were discussed by Waterhouse (1993b). Of 160 insect and mite pests nominated as important in Southeast Asia, a subset of 47 was rated as particularly so. The aim of the present work has been to summarise information relevant to the prospects for classical biological control of the most important of those of this subset of 47 that are thought to have evolved outside Southeast Asia. The assumption is that many of these have been introduced without some (sometimes without any) of the natural enemies that help to control them where they evolved. The chances are very much lower for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insecta, Diptera): Proposed Conservation of Usage by Designation of Musca Plebeja Linnaeus, 1758 As the Type Species of Thereva
    198 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 60(3) September 2003 Case 3251 Thereva Latreille, 1797 and Phasia Latreille, 1804 (Insecta, Diptera): proposed conservation of usage by designation of Musca plebeja Linnaeus, 1758 as the type species of Thereva Kevin C. Holston Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) Michael E. Irwin Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) F. Christian Thompson Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, BARC, ARS, USDA, do Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The purpose of this application, in relation to Article 67.2 of the Code, is to conserve the usage of the name Thereva Latreille, 1797 for a cosmopolitan genus of stiletto flies (family THEREVIDAE) that currently includes 201 species, and also the usage of Phasia Latreille, 1804 and PHASIINAE for a group of tachinid flies (family TACHINIDAE), some of which are economically important as parasites of plant bugs (Heteroptera). It is proposed that Musca plebeja Linnaeus, 1758 should be designated as the type species of the therevid genus Thereva. M. plebeja was not one of the nominal species that were first associated with the name Thereva by Fabricius (1798). Fabricius used Thereva for a group of tachinid flies that are now referred to by the name Phasia Latreille, 1804. Keywords. Nomenclature; taxonomy; Diptera; THEREVIDAE; TACHINIDAE; Thereva; Phasia; Thereva plebeja; stiletto flies; tachinids. 1. Latreille (1797, p. 168) described a genus of stiletto fries (now in the family THEREVIDAE) and named it Thereva.
    [Show full text]
  • 76 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Galathea, Berichte des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen e.V. Jahr/Year: 1997 Band/Volume: 13 Autor(en)/Author(s): Dunk Klaus von der Artikel/Article: Ecological studies on Pipunculidae (Diptera) 61-76 ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at galathea 13/2 Berichte des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen1997 • S. 61 -76 Ecological studies on Pipunculidae (Diptera) K laus von der D unk Zusammenfassung: Es wird über Freilandbeobachtungen an Augenfliegen berich­ tet. Räumlich begrenzte Vorkommen erwiesen sich als erstaunlich artenreich. Sie werden im einzelnen vorgestellt, sowie eine bemerkenswerte Begleitfauna genannt. Betrachtungen von Verhaltensweisen runden das Bild ab, zeigen aber gleichzeitig die Notwendigkeit für weitere Studien. Abstract: Studies on Pipunculid flies in their natural environment are presented. Certain places are described, which proved to be astonishingly rieh in species. Some remarkable associating insect species are listed. As far as investigated comments on the behaviour of the adult flies are added. Key words: Diptera, Pipunculidae, behaviour, ecology Introduction Pipunculid flies are rather small mostly black insects, developing as parasitoids inside leafhoppers, with the ability of hovering (relationship to Syrphidae) and with enormous compound eyes, useful for males in search for females, and for females in search for a potential victim, a cicad larva. Most specimen of Pipunculidae studied so far were collected by Malaise traps. This material allows to describe the existing species, to secure their systematical stand, and to mark their distribution. Many questions in this chapter are still open. On the other hand the development as parasitoids in leafhoppers show fascinating aspects of adaptations to this life and even has an ecological/economical content regarding pest control.
    [Show full text]
  • Elachistidae: Agonoxeninae
    Agonoxena argaula Elachistidae: Agonoxeninae: Agonoxenini Palm Moths, Grass-Miner Moths Biosecurity BIOSECURITY ALERT This Family is of Biosecurity Concern Occurrence This family occurs in Australia. Background Palm moths are a small group of 31 genera that belong to the Agonoxeninae, a sub-family of the family Elachistidae (grass-miner moths). This sub-family is divided into two tribes the Agonoxenini and the Blastodacnini, twenty species of which are native to Australia. Agonoxenini are globally known as pests of palms, and consist of, and typified by, the four species belonging to the genus Agonoxena: A. argaula, A. phoenicia, A. pyrogramma and A. miniana. The Australian native representative of this genus is Agonoxena phoenicia (palm moth), which feeds on Alexandra or northern bangalow palm (Archontophoenix alexandrae). The taxonomy of this group has recently undergone major changes from studies incorporating new molecular and morphological data. Firstly, the former family Blastodacnidae was retained under the Agonoxenidae (Hodges, in Kristensen 1999), and then the latter treated under the Elachistidae to become the subfamily Agonoxeninae (Heikkilä et al. 2014, Sohn et al. 2016), relegating the Blastodacnidae and the Agonoxena group to tribal status, Blastodacnini and Agonoxenini respectively. Palm moths are the only members of the Elachistidae, currently considered to be of biosecurity importance to northern Australia. Diagnosis Diagnostic Features of Agonoxenini (Palm Moth Caterpillars) 1. Secondary setae present. Agonoxena argaula has numerous secondary setae that are much smaller than the primary setae. However, A. pyrogramma only has secondary setae on the prolegs and A10 but it is still likely that secondary setae are characteristic of Agonoxena (see Agonoxena diagnosis and description below).
    [Show full text]
  • Les Tachinidae De La Manche
    Les Tachinidae de la Manche : début de l’enquête et première liste (Diptera Brachycera) La famille de mouches que nous allons aborder dans cet article offre le paradoxe d’être à la fois l’une des plus riches en espèces et l’une des plus mal connues des entomologistes. Discrètes, souvent de petite taille et peu colorées, elles passent facilement inaperçues. Totalement ignorées du profane, elles n’ont reçu aucun nom vernaculaire et c’est à peine si les guides de vulgarisation représentent quelques espèces, 6 par exemple dans CHINERY (1986) contre 22 syrphes, famille d’ampleur comparable, soit moins de 1% de la faune européenne ! Un guide spécialisé dans les diptères, J. & H. HAUPT (1998), dont l’éditeur suisse annonce sans vergogne en couverture « l’identification des espèces européennes », illustre 13 espèces, soit 1,5% de la faune d’Europe. Il est certain que l’ampleur de la tâche a pu rebuter les diptéristes de notre pays, d’autant plus qu’aujourd’hui encore aucun ouvrage complet de détermination n’est actuellement disponible en langue française. Et pourtant ces mouches ne manquent pas d’attrait ! De nombreuses espèces sont d’une taille respectable, sous la loupe beaucoup même offrent un aspect séduisant par leurs couleurs veloutées, leurs reflets pruineux, leur système organisé de poils et de soies, toutes surtout ont une biologie complexe, captivante et encore mal étudiée. Pour tout dire, cette enquête limitée à la Manche (voir L’Argiope No 67) s’annonce passionnante car la page est totalement vierge et le champ de recherche immense. Bien sûr, les obstacles sont tels que l’inventaire devra être abordé avec prudence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Entomologist 1925-1966
    RECOLLEcnONS OF A Pacific Entomologist 1925-1966 WITH PHOTOGRAPHS BY THE AUTHOR R.W. Paine Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1994 The Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of Ihe Australian Parliament. lis primary mandate is 10 help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names ore used this does not constitute endorsement of nar discrimination against any product by the Centre. This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or malerial deemed relevant 10 ACIAR's research and development objectives. The series is distributed intemationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research GPO Box 157 t Conberra, Australia 2601 . Paine, R.w. 1994. Recollections of a Pacific Entomologist 1925 - 1966. ACIAR Monograph No 27. 120pp. ISBN 1 86320 106 8 Technical editing and production: Arowang Information Bureau Ply Ltd. Canberra Cover: BPD Graphic Associates, Canberra in association with Arawang Information Bureau Ply Lld Printed by The Craftsman Press Ply Ltd. Burwood, Victoria. ACIAR acknowledges the generous support of tihe Paine family in the compilation of this book. Long before agricultural 1920s was already at the Foreword sustainability entered forefront of world biological common parlance, or hazards control activities. Many of the associated with misuse of projects studied by Ron Paine pesticides captured headlines, and his colleagues are touched environmentally friendly on in his delightful and biological control of introduced evocative reminiscences.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Forest Management Plan for Palmyra Atoll
    Prepared for The Nature Conservancy Palmyra Program Terrestrial Forest Management Plan for Palmyra Atoll Open-File Report 2011–1007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Images showing native species of the terrestrial forest at Palmyra Atoll (on the left from top to bottom: red-footed boobies, an undescribed gecko, and a coconut crab). The forests shown are examples of Pisonia grandis forest on Lost Islet (above) and an example of coconut palm monoculture on Kaula Islet (below) at Palmyra Atoll. (Photographs by Stacie Hathaway, U.S. Geological Survey, 2008.) Terrestrial Forest Management Plan for Palmyra Atoll By Stacie A. Hathaway, Kathryn McEachern, and Robert N. Fisher Prepared for The Nature Conservancy Palmyra Program Open-File Report 2011–1007 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Hathaway, S.A., McEachern, K., and Fisher, R.N., 2011, Terrestrial forest management plan for Palmyra Atoll: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1007, 78 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology, Host Range, Parasites, and Hyperparasites of Koa Seed Insects in Hawaii: a Review
    Vol. 24, Nos. 2 & 3, October 15,1983 317 The Biology, Host Range, Parasites, and Hyperparasites of Koa Seed Insects in Hawaii: a Review JOHN D. STEIN1 ABSTRACT The biology and host range of koa seed insects, their parasites, and hyperparasites in Hawaii are reviewed. The information reported may be applicable to other native or introduced legumes because of the wide hosthnst rangeranopt ofrtf a fewfi»w ofnf thetht* insects.inc^Wc Koa, Acacia koa Gray, is considered the most valuable native timber species in Hawaii. Pure stands of koa cover approximately 7.5 thousand hectares (18.6 thousand acres) with an additional 172.4 thousand hectares (426 thousand acres) of koa-ohia mixture in the native forest ecosystems within the State. Selective logging has reduced the quality of koa to less desirable commercial grade trees. Since 1978, the Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources has been replanting sites where koa once grew. The emphasis on reforestation of this high value hardwood has stimulated research by the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, to select and propagate genetically superior trees. Progeny from these trees will then be used to establish viable seed orchards. Insects present a potentially serious threat to koa seed production. In a recent survey, I found that up to 86% of the seed was destroyed by insects, and three insects were responsible for 93% of the damage (Stein 1983). This review discusses the biology and host range of the koa seed insects, and lists their parasites. Previously published biological data for these insects were augmented with information from the Bernice P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Geology of Tuvalu: an Annotated Bibliography
    ISSN 1031-8062 ISBN 0 7305 5592 5 The Biology and Geology of Tuvalu: an Annotated Bibliography K. A. Rodgers and Carol' Cant.-11 Technical Reports of the Australian Museu~ Number-t TECHNICAL REPORTS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM Director: Technical Reports of the Australian Museum is D.J.G . Griffin a series of occasional papers which publishes Editor: bibliographies, catalogues, surveys, and data bases in J.K. Lowry the fields of anthropology, geology and zoology. The journal is an adjunct to Records of the Australian Assistant Editor: J.E. Hanley Museum and the Supplement series which publish original research in natural history. It is designed for Associate Editors: the quick dissemination of information at a moderate Anthropology: cost. The information is relevant to Australia, the R.J. Lampert South-west Pacific and the Indian Ocean area. Invertebrates: Submitted manuscripts are reviewed by external W.B. Rudman referees. A reasonable number of copies are distributed to scholarly institutions in Australia and Geology: around the world. F.L. Sutherland Submitted manuscripts should be addressed to the Vertebrates: Editor, Australian Museum, P.O. Box A285, Sydney A.E . Greer South, N.S.W. 2000, Australia. Manuscripts should preferably be on 51;4 inch diskettes in DOS format and ©Copyright Australian Museum, 1988 should include an original and two copies. No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission of the Editor. Technical Reports are not available through subscription. New issues will be announced in the Produced by the Australian Museum Records. Orders should be addressed to the Assistant 15 September 1988 Editor (Community Relations), Australian Museum, $16.00 bought at the Australian Museum P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Cook Islands
    GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 2015 COUNTRY REPORT Cook Islands Rome, 2014 FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world´s forests and their management and uses through the Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA). This country report is prepared as a contribution to the FAO publication, the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (FRA 2015). The content and the structure are in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines given by FAO in the document Guide for country reporting for FRA 2015 (http://www.fao.org/3/a-au190e.pdf). These reports were submitted to FAO as official government documents. The content and the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the entity submitting the report to FAO. FAO may not be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this report. FRA 2015 – Country Report, Cook Islands TABLE OF CONTENTS Report preparation and contact persons...............................................................................................................................4 1. What is the area of forest and other wooded land and how has it changed over time? ................................................. 7 2. What is the area of natural and planted forest and how has it changed over time? ..................................................... 16 3. What are the stocks and growth rates of the forests and how have they changed? .....................................................22 4. What is the status of forest production and how has it changed over time? .................................................................29 5. How much forest area is managed for protection of soil and water and ecosystem services? ..................................... 39 6. How much forest area is protected and designated for the conservation of biodiversity and how has it changed over time? ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View the PDF File of the Tachinid Times, Issue 12
    The Tachinid Times ISSUE 12 February 1999 Jim O’Hara, editor Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Biological Resources Program Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre C.E.F., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Correspondence: [email protected] The Tachinid Times began in 1988 when personal Evolution of Egg Structure in Tachinidae (by S.P. computers were gaining in popularity, yet before the Gaponov) advent of e-mail and the World Wide Web. A newsletter Using a scanning electron microscope I investigated distributed through the mail seemed like a useful the egg structure of 114 species of Tachinidae. The endeavour to foster greater awareness about the work of research was focused on the peculiarities of the egg others among researchers interested in the Tachinidae. surface and the structure of the aeropylar area. Data on Now, eleven years later, despite the speed and the method of egg-laying, the structure of the female convenience of e-mail and other advanced modes of reproductive system and the host range were also taken communication, this newsletter still seems to hold a place into consideration. Since any kind of adaptation is a in the distribution of news about the Tachinidae. If there result of evolution and every stage of ontogenesis, is sufficient interest - and submissions - over the course including the egg stage, is adapted to some specific of the next year, then another issue will appear in environmental conditions, each stage of ontogenesis February of the new millennium. As always, please send evolved more or less independently. The development of me your news for inclusion in the newsletter before the provisionary devices (coenogenetic adaptations) and their end of next January.
    [Show full text]
  • Dysdercus Cingulatus
    Prelims (F) Page i Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects D.F. Waterhouse (ACIAR Consultant in Plant Protection) Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1998 Prelims (F) Page ii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World ©Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT 2601. Waterhouse, D.F. 1998, Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects. ACIAR Monograph No. 51, 548 pp + viii, 1 fig. 16 maps. ISBN 1 86320 221 8 Design and layout by Arawang Communication Group, Canberra Cover: Nezara viridula adult, egg rafts and hatching nymphs. Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne ii Prelims (F) Page iii Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Contents Foreword vii 1 Abstract 1 2 Estimation of biological control
    [Show full text]
  • Host Factors Influencing the Parasitism by Nesolynx Thymus (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on Housefly, Musca Domestica L
    Journal of Biological Control, 34(3): 200-207, 2020, DOI: 10.18311/jbc/2020/26205 Volume: 34 No. 3 (September) 2020 (a) (b) Nesolynx thymus (a) female and (b) male - a parasitoid of housey - 202 Research Article Host factors influencing the parasitism byNesolynx thymus (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on housefly, Musca domestica L. R. SENTHOORRAJA1,2, K. SUBAHARAN2*, ANKITA GUPTA2, S. BASAVARAJAPPA1, Y. LALITHA2, N. BAKTHAVATSALAM2 and K. P. CHANDRAN3 1Department of Zoology Studies, University of Mysore, Mysore - 570006, Karnataka, India 2ICAR - National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, H. A. Farm Post, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bengaluru - 560024, Karnataka, India 3ICAR - Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod - 671124, Kerala, India *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Housefly, Musca domestica is used as an alternate host to rear a eulophid, Nesolynx thymus (Girault), a pupal parasitoid of the tachinid fly, Exorista bombycis (Louis) which in turn is an endolarval parasitoid of Bombyx mori (L.). An attempt was made to evaluate the host factors like pupal size, age and exposure periods of N. thymus for developing robust mass multiplication methods. The host size had significant effect on mean parasitism byN. thymus. Mated females of N. thymus when exposed to host pupae of varying size, revealed that mean per cent parasitisation was significantly higher (74%) in large sized pupae having a volume of 263.89 mm3. Regarding host age, 24 - 48 h old host pupae had higher level of parasitism (65%) by N. thymus. The parasitism rate declined with an increase in host age after 72 h. In field evaluation, release ofN. thymus at weekly interval resulted in the reduction of housefly population as evinced from the higher parasitism (56 %) of the sentinel cards placed in the treated poultry sheds.
    [Show full text]