DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1105.1514V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 7 Jul 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1105.1514V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 7 Jul 2011 An analytic approach to baryon acoustic oscillations Francesco Montanari∗ and Ruth Durrery D´epartement de Physique Th´eorique,Universit´ede Gen`eve, 24 Quai E. Ansermet, 1211 Gen`eve4, Switzerland (Dated: October 30, 2018) The fitting formula for the location of the first acoustic peak in the matter power spectrum is revised. We discuss the physics that leads to baryon acoustic oscillations: the recombination history, the tight coupling approximation and the velocity overshoot effect. A new fitting formula is pro- posed, which is in accordance within 5% with numerical results for a suitable range of cosmological parameters, whereas previous results yield deviations of up to (15 − 20)%. The crucial improvement turns out to be the accuracy of the recombination history. Keywords: Cosmological large scale structure, tight coupling, velocity overshoot, baryon acoustic oscillations. I. INTRODUCTION Thomson scattering, which couples electrons and pho- tons, is much more rapid than the expansion of the uni- verse t H−1, where t = (σ n )−1 is the photon Before recombination the Universe is dense and highly s s T e scattering time scale (i.e. the mean time between Thom- ionized, and baryons and photons are tightly coupled by son scatterings) and H−1 the expansion time scale of Thomson scattering. The pressure of the Cosmic Mi- the universe. Here σ is the Thomson cross section and crowave Background (CMB) photons opposes gravita- T n is the number density of free electrons. Since scat- tional collapse and leads to acoustic oscillations. In fact, e tering is rapid compared with the travel time across a during this phase, the amplitude of perturbations in the wavelength, we can expand the perturbation equations baryon density cannot grow, but they oscillate with a in powers of the Thomson mean free path λ = t =κ _ −1 slowly decaying amplitude. After recombination, baryons s s over a wavelength λ / k−1, i.e. k=κ_ , whereκ _ = aσ n decouple from radiation and the oscillations are `frozen T e is the differential optical depth. To the lowest order we in'. Because baryons represent a significant fraction obtain the tight coupling approximation (TCA) [12]. A of matter, cosmological perturbation theory [1] predicts more rigorous definition and treatment of the TCA can that these acoustic oscillations of the baryons (BAO's) be found in [13], while [14] analyzes the second-order ap- are imprinted on the late-time matter power spectrum, proximation in the inverse Thomson opacity expansion. leaving features analogous to the acoustic peaks in the In [15] formulas for the TCA to second-order are derived CMB power spectrum. The BAO's have indeed been ob- independently and tested. These results are implemented served in the large scale galaxy distribution [2{4], and by the Class Boltzmann code. they are one of the main observational goals of recent and upcoming surveys. It can be demonstrated that at large scales the trans- Numerical calculations of the recombination history fer function is governed by density perturbations, which are available thanks to, e.g., the Rico [5] or the Rec- oscillate roughly like a cos (ks) where s is the sound hori- fast [6] codes for the recombination history. The lat- zon at decoupling, see e.g. [16] and the Appendix D of ter, in particular, is the default model used in the Camb [1]. However, the corresponding velocity perturbation Boltzmann-solver code [7]. It does reproduce the results dominates in the small scale limit. When the oscillations shown in [6] and is a fast approximation to the detailed are released at decoupling, baryons move kinematically calculations described in [8] with some updates discussed according to their velocity and generate a new density in [9] and with the Compton coupling treatment of [10]. perturbation [11]. This `velocity overshoot' effect is re- The numerical calculation of the recombination history sponsible for the fact that the transfer function, for suf- is much more time expensive than employing analytical ficiently large ks, actually behaves like sin (ks). arXiv:1105.1514v3 [astro-ph.CO] 7 Jul 2011 approximations or fitting formulae, like the ones used In this paper we derive a fitting formula for the loca- by [11] which are an improvement of the fits presented in tion of the peaks and troughs in the matter power spec- Appendix D of [1]. Nevertheless, an accurate computa- trum by matching the solutions for the matter density tion of the recombination history turns out to be a sig- perturbation before and after decoupling. We obtain a nificant step for the evaluation of the location of troughs form which is consistent with the one proposed in [11] for and peaks in the transfer function. the position of the first peak. However, our fit is tested At early times, before recombination, baryons and pho- considering recent cosmological parameters and it uses tons behave as a single `tightly coupled' fluid because an improved recombination history. The latter turns out to be an important amelioration which lets us achieve a significantly better accuracy than the previous fit. Even though one can compute the positions of these peaks nu- ∗Electronic address: [email protected] merically with the help e.g. of Camb-code, we believe yElectronic address: [email protected] that an analytical fit has its merits as it helps us to see 2 immediately what effect a variation of cosmological pa- B. Tight Coupling Approximation rameters will have and since it gives us a better under- standing of the physics involved. Here we derive an analytical solution for the baryon The paper is organized as follows. In Section II we density perturbation in the tight coupling approximation review the physics leading to BAO: the ionization history, (TCA) in first order perturbation theory using the WKB the TCA and the velocity overshoot effect. In Section III approximation valid for a slowly varying R, inside the we give the fitting formula and we compare the results (γb) sound horizon at decoupling given by s ' cs ηdec. Here with [11]. We state our conclusions in Section IV. Some c(γb) is the sound speed of the baryon-photons fluid (de- details of the derivations are moved to an Appendix A. s fined in appendix A, Eq. (A5)), and ηdec is the decoupling time. Hence, we must keep in mind that this approxima- tion is valid only for sufficiently large k. For the range of II. BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATIONS our interest this is fine since acoustic oscillations concern relatively small scales, of the order of 100h−1 Mpc [2]. We perform our calculation in the uniform curvature We review the physics leading to BAO, in order to gauge, the differences between the variables calculated highlight the main results that allow us to locate the in different gauges is small on sub-horizon scales [19]. peaks and troughs in the transfer function. Furthermore, all the physical observables must be indeed We use the notation of [17]. In particular, t denotes gauge invariant. So, in terms of the density perturbation the cosmic time and η conformal time such that adη = in the uniform curvature gauge, Dg [17], the general tight dt, where a is the scale factor. An over-dot indicates coupling solution for the baryon density perturbation is a derivative w.r.t. the conformal time ( _ ) ≡ d/dη (). given by (see appendix A for a derivation) We also use of the notation R ≡ 3ρb=4ργ , where the subscripts b and γ label the energy density of baryons and 1 1=4 D(t:c:) (k; η) = D(in) cos (kr ) photons, respectively. Our reference model is a ΛCDM gb gb 1 + R (η) s Universe. −E (k; η) ; (1a) where " A. Ionization history Z η 2 + R (ζ) E (k; η) = (1 + R (η))−1=4 dζ 3=4 0 (1 + R (ζ)) In [6] a calculation of the recombination of H, He I, # and He II in the early Universe is developed which is im- sin [kr (η) − kr (ζ)] × s s k2Ψ(k; ζ) : (1b) plemented in the publicly available code . The (γb) Recfast kc (ζ) methodology is to calculate recombination with as few s approximations as possible. One of the main improve- D(in) = (3=4)D(in) is determined by the adiabatic initial ments with respect to previous calculations is that it gb gγ condition and Ψ (k; η) is the Bardeen potential [19]. We takes into account that the population of excited atomic have introduced the (comoving) sound horizon r (η) ≡ level depart from an equilibrium distribution. Indeed, s R η dζcγb (ζ), i.e., the distance that a wave can travel in a recombination is not an equilibrium process. Simplified 0 s time η. During the tight coupling phase the baryon den- analytical calculations or approximate fitting formulae sity perturbations undergoes harmonic motion following for the recombination history are too crude to give good roughly a cosine mode with an amplitude that decays in approximations for the location of peaks and troughs in −1=4 the matter transfer function as we will discuss in xIII. time as (1 + R (η)) . To show that this solution follows a cosine mode, a Recfast models hydrogen and helium atoms as effec- simple analytical approximation of the Bardeen potential tive three-level systems, including some artificial correc- Ψ(k; η) can be obtained by writing the Bardeen equa- tions via conveniently chosen fudge factors [9]. An alter- tion in the case of adiabatic perturbations for a mix- native approach is the Rico code [5], which smoothly ture of perfect fluids (photons, baryons and CDM). On interpolates the ionization fraction on a set of pre- super-horizon and sub-horizon scales one finds [19], re- computed recombination histories for different cosmolo- spectively, gies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neutrino Decoupling Beyond the Standard Model: CMB Constraints on the Dark Matter Mass with a Fast and Precise Neff Evaluation
    KCL-2018-76 Prepared for submission to JCAP Neutrino decoupling beyond the Standard Model: CMB constraints on the Dark Matter mass with a fast and precise Neff evaluation Miguel Escudero Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology Group Department of Physics, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The number of effective relativistic neutrino species represents a fundamental probe of the thermal history of the early Universe, and as such of the Standard Model of Particle Physics. Traditional approaches to the process of neutrino decoupling are either very technical and computationally expensive, or assume that neutrinos decouple instantaneously. In this work, we aim to fill the gap between these two approaches by modeling neutrino decoupling in terms of two simple coupled differential equations for the electromagnetic and neutrino sector temperatures, in which all the relevant interactions are taken into account and which allows for a straightforward implementation of BSM species. Upon including finite temperature QED corrections we reach an accuracy on Neff in the SM of 0:01. We illustrate the usefulness of this approach to neutrino decoupling by considering, in a model independent manner, the impact of MeV thermal dark matter on Neff . We show that Planck rules out electrophilic and neutrinophilic thermal dark matter particles of m < 3:0 MeV at 95% CL regardless of their spin, and of their annihilation being s-wave or p-wave. We point out arXiv:1812.05605v4 [hep-ph] 6 Sep 2019 that thermal dark matter particles with non-negligible interactions with both electrons and neutrinos are more elusive to CMB observations than purely electrophilic or neutrinophilic ones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abstract 1
    David Goodstein’s Cosmology Book The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abraham Loeb Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, 60 Garden St., Cambridge MA, 02138 Abstract Cosmology is by now a mature experimental science. We are privileged to live at a time when the story of genesis (how the Universe started and developed) can be critically explored by direct observations. Looking deep into the Universe through powerful telescopes, we can see images of the Universe when it was younger because of the finite time it takes light to travel to us from distant sources. Existing data sets include an image of the Universe when it was 0.4 million years old (in the form of the cosmic microwave background), as well as images of individual galaxies when the Universe was older than a billion years. But there is a serious challenge: in between these two epochs was a period when the Universe was dark, stars had not yet formed, and the cosmic microwave background no longer traced the distribution of matter. And this is precisely the most interesting period, when the primordial soup evolved into the rich zoo of objects we now see. The observers are moving ahead along several fronts. The first involves the construction of large infrared telescopes on the ground and in space, that will provide us with new photos of the first galaxies. Current plans include ground-based telescopes which are 24-42 meter in diameter, and NASA’s successor to the Hubble Space Telescope, called the James Webb Space Telescope. In addition, several observational groups around the globe are constructing radio arrays that will be capable of mapping the three-dimensional distribution of cosmic hydrogen in the infant Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of the Universe, the Hubble Constant, the Accelerated Expansion and the Hubble Effect
    The age of the universe, the Hubble constant, the accelerated expansion and the Hubble effect Domingos Soares∗ Departamento de F´ısica,ICEx, UFMG | C.P. 702 30123-970, Belo Horizonte | Brazil October 25, 2018 Abstract The idea of an accelerating universe comes almost simultaneously with the determination of Hubble's constant by one of the Hubble Space Tele- scope Key Projects. The age of the universe dilemma is probably the link between these two issues. In an appendix, I claim that \Hubble's law" might yet to be investigated for its ultimate cause, and suggest the \Hubble effect” as the searched candidate. 1 The age dilemma The age of the universe is calculated by two different ways. Firstly, a lower limit is given by the age of the presumably oldest objects in the Milky Way, e.g., globular clusters. Their ages are calculated with the aid of stellar evolu- tion models which yield 14 Gyr and 10% uncertainty. These are fairly confident figures since the basics of stellar evolution are quite solid. Secondly, a cosmo- logical age based on the Standard Cosmology Model derived from the Theory of General Relativity. The three basic models of relativistic cosmology are given by the Friedmann's solutions of Einstein's field equations. The models are char- acterized by a decelerated expansion from a spatial singularity at cosmic time t = 0, and whose magnitude is quantified by the density parameter Ω◦, the present ratio of the mass density in the universe to the so-called critical mass arXiv:0908.1864v8 [physics.gen-ph] 28 Jul 2015 density.
    [Show full text]
  • Majorana Neutrino Magnetic Moment and Neutrino Decoupling in Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 92, 125020 (2015) Majorana neutrino magnetic moment and neutrino decoupling in big bang nucleosynthesis † ‡ N. Vassh,1,* E. Grohs,2, A. B. Balantekin,1, and G. M. Fuller3,§ 1Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA 2Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA 3Department of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA (Received 1 October 2015; published 22 December 2015) We examine the physics of the early universe when Majorana neutrinos (νe, νμ, ντ) possess transition magnetic moments. These extra couplings beyond the usual weak interaction couplings alter the way neutrinos decouple from the plasma of electrons/positrons and photons. We calculate how transition magnetic moment couplings modify neutrino decoupling temperatures, and then use a full weak, strong, and electromagnetic reaction network to compute corresponding changes in big bang nucleosynthesis abundance yields. We find that light element abundances and other cosmological parameters are sensitive to −10 magnetic couplings on the order of 10 μB. Given the recent analysis of sub-MeV Borexino data which −11 constrains Majorana moments to the order of 10 μB or less, we find that changes in cosmological parameters from magnetic contributions to neutrino decoupling temperatures are below the level of upcoming precision observations. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.125020 PACS numbers: 13.15.+g, 26.35.+c, 14.60.St, 14.60.Lm I. INTRODUCTION Such processes alter the primordial abundance yields which can be used to constrain the allowed sterile neutrino mass In this paper we explore how the early universe, and the and magnetic moment parameter space [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Big Bang, Space-Time Structure, Asymptotic Universe
    EPJ Web of Conferences 71, 0 0 063 (2 014 ) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20147100063 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2014 Pre-Big Bang, space-time structure, asymptotic Universe Spinorial space-time and a new approach to Friedmann-like equations Luis Gonzalez-Mestres1,a 1Megatrend Cosmology Laboratory, Megatrend University, Belgrade and Paris Goce Delceva 8, 11070 Novi Beograd, Serbia Abstract. Planck and other recent data in Cosmology and Particle Physics can open the way to controversial analyses concerning the early Universe and its possible ultimate origin. Alternatives to standard cosmology include pre-Big Bang approaches, new space- time geometries and new ultimate constituents of matter. Basic issues related to a possible new cosmology along these lines clearly deserve further exploration. The Planck collab- oration reports an age of the Universe t close to 13.8 Gyr and a present ratio H between relative speeds and distances at cosmic scale around 67.3 km/s/Mpc. The product of these two measured quantities is then slightly below 1 (about 0.95), while it can be exactly 1 in the absence of matter and cosmological constant in patterns based on the spinorial space- time we have considered in previous papers. In this description of space-time we first suggested in 1996-97, the cosmic time t is given by the modulus of a SU(2) spinor and the Lundmark-Lemaître-Hubble (LLH) expansion law turns out to be of purely geometric origin previous to any introduction of standard matter and relativity. Such a fundamen- tal geometry, inspired by the role of half-integer spin in Particle Physics, may reflect an equilibrium between the dynamics of the ultimate constituents of matter and the deep structure of space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ups and Downs of Baryon Oscillations
    The Ups and Downs of Baryon Oscillations Eric V. Linder Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 ABSTRACT Baryon acoustic oscillations, measured through the patterned distribution of galaxies or other baryon tracing objects on very large (∼> 100 Mpc) scales, offer a possible geometric probe of cosmological distances. Pluses and minuses in this approach’s leverage for understanding dark energy are discussed, as are systematic uncertainties requiring further investigation. Conclusions are that 1) BAO offer promise of a new avenue to distance measurements and further study is warranted, 2) the measurements will need to attain ∼ 1% accuracy (requiring a 10000 square degree spectroscopic survey) for their dark energy leverage to match that from supernovae, but do give complementary information at 2% accuracy. Because of the ties to the matter dominated era, BAO is not a replacement probe of dark energy, but a valuable complement. 1. Introduction This paper provides a pedagogical introduction to baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), accessible to readers not necessarily familiar with details of large scale structure in the universe. In addition, it summarizes some of the current issues – plus and minus – with the use of BAO as a cosmological probe of the nature of dark energy. For more quantitative, arXiv:astro-ph/0507308v2 17 Jan 2006 technical discussions of these issues, see White (2005). The same year as the detection of the cosmic microwave background, the photon bath remnant from the hot, early universe, Sakharov (1965) predicted the presence of acoustic oscillations in a coupled baryonic matter distribution. In his case, baryons were coupled to cold electrons rather than hot photons; Peebles & Yu (1970) and Sunyaev & Zel’dovich (1970) pioneered the correct, hot case.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Bang Cosmological Model: Theory and Observations
    THE BIG BANG COSMOLOGICAL MODEL: THEORY AND OBSERVATIONS MARTINA GERBINO INFN, sezione di Ferrara ISAPP 2021 Valencia July 22st, 2021 1 Structure formation Maps of CMB anisotropies show the Universe as it was at the time of recombination. The CMB field is isotropic and !" the rms fluctuations (in total intensity) are very small, < | |# > ~10$% (even smaller in polarization). Density " perturbations � ≡ ��/� are proportional to CMB fluctuations. It is possible to show that, at recombination, perturbations could be from a few (for baryons) to at most 100 times (for CDM) larger than CMB fluctuations. We need a theory of structure formation that allows to link the tiny perturbations at z~1100 to the large scale structure of the Universe we observe today (from galaxies to clusters and beyond). General picture: small density perturbations grow via gravitational instability (Jeans mechanism). The growth is suppressed during radiation-domination and eventually kicks-off after the time of equality (z~3000). When inside the horizon, perturbations grow proportional to the scale factor as long as they are in MD and remain in the linear regime (� ≪ 1). M. GERBINO 2 ISAPP-VALENCIA, 22 JULY 2021 Preliminaries & (⃗ $&) Density contrast �(�⃗) ≡ and its Fourier expansion � = ∫ �+� �(�⃗) exp(��. �⃗) &) * Credits: Kolb&Turner 2� � � ≡ ; � = ; � = ��; � ,-./ � ,-./ � � �+, �� � ≡ �+ �; � � = �(�)$+� ∝ 6 ,-./ -01 6 �+/#, �� �+ �(�) ≈ �3 -01 2� The amplitude of perturbations as they re-enter the horizon is given by the primordial power spectrum. Once perturbations re-enter the horizon, micro-physics processes modify the primordial spectrum Scale factor M. GERBINO 3 ISAPP-VALENCIA, 22 JULY 2021 Jeans mechanism (non-expanding) The Newtonian motion of a perfect fluid is decribed via the Eulerian equations.
    [Show full text]
  • AST4220: Cosmology I
    AST4220: Cosmology I Øystein Elgarøy 2 Contents 1 Cosmological models 1 1.1 Special relativity: space and time as a unity . 1 1.2 Curvedspacetime......................... 3 1.3 Curved spaces: the surface of a sphere . 4 1.4 The Robertson-Walker line element . 6 1.5 Redshifts and cosmological distances . 9 1.5.1 Thecosmicredshift . 9 1.5.2 Properdistance. 11 1.5.3 The luminosity distance . 13 1.5.4 The angular diameter distance . 14 1.5.5 The comoving coordinate r ............... 15 1.6 TheFriedmannequations . 15 1.6.1 Timetomemorize! . 20 1.7 Equationsofstate ........................ 21 1.7.1 Dust: non-relativistic matter . 21 1.7.2 Radiation: relativistic matter . 22 1.8 The evolution of the energy density . 22 1.9 The cosmological constant . 24 1.10 Some classic cosmological models . 26 1.10.1 Spatially flat, dust- or radiation-only models . 27 1.10.2 Spatially flat, empty universe with a cosmological con- stant............................ 29 1.10.3 Open and closed dust models with no cosmological constant.......................... 31 1.10.4 Models with more than one component . 34 1.10.5 Models with matter and radiation . 35 1.10.6 TheflatΛCDMmodel. 37 1.10.7 Models with matter, curvature and a cosmological con- stant............................ 40 1.11Horizons.............................. 42 1.11.1 Theeventhorizon . 44 1.11.2 Theparticlehorizon . 45 1.11.3 Examples ......................... 46 I II CONTENTS 1.12 The Steady State model . 48 1.13 Some observable quantities and how to calculate them . 50 1.14 Closingcomments . 52 1.15Exercises ............................. 53 2 The early, hot universe 61 2.1 Radiation temperature in the early universe .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0910.5224V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009
    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Bruce A. Bassett 1,2,a & Ren´ee Hlozek1,2,3,b 1 South African Astronomical Observatory, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa 7700 2 Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa 7700 3 Department of Astrophysics, University of Oxford Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK a [email protected] b [email protected] Abstract Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) are frozen relics left over from the pre-decoupling universe. They are the standard rulers of choice for 21st century cosmology, provid- ing distance estimates that are, for the first time, firmly rooted in well-understood, linear physics. This review synthesises current understanding regarding all aspects of BAO cosmology, from the theoretical and statistical to the observational, and includes a map of the future landscape of BAO surveys, both spectroscopic and photometric . † 1.1 Introduction Whilst often phrased in terms of the quest to uncover the nature of dark energy, a more general rubric for cosmology in the early part of the 21st century might also be the “the distance revolution”. With new knowledge of the extra-galactic distance arXiv:0910.5224v1 [astro-ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009 ladder we are, for the first time, beginning to accurately probe the cosmic expansion history beyond the local universe. While standard candles – most notably Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) – kicked off the revolution, it is clear that Statistical Standard Rulers, and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in particular, will play an increasingly important role. In this review we cover the theoretical, observational and statistical aspects of the BAO as standard rulers and examine the impact BAO will have on our understand- † This review is an extended version of a chapter in the book Dark Energy Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble's Diagram and Cosmic Expansion
    Hubble’s diagram and cosmic expansion Robert P. Kirshner* Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 Contributed by Robert P. Kirshner, October 21, 2003 Edwin Hubble’s classic article on the expanding universe appeared in PNAS in 1929 [Hubble, E. P. (1929) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 15, 168–173]. The chief result, that a galaxy’s distance is proportional to its redshift, is so well known and so deeply embedded into the language of astronomy through the Hubble diagram, the Hubble constant, Hubble’s Law, and the Hubble time, that the article itself is rarely referenced. Even though Hubble’s distances have a large systematic error, Hubble’s velocities come chiefly from Vesto Melvin Slipher, and the interpretation in terms of the de Sitter effect is out of the mainstream of modern cosmology, this article opened the way to investigation of the expanding, evolving, and accelerating universe that engages today’s burgeoning field of cosmology. he publication of Edwin Hub- ble’s 1929 article ‘‘A relation between distance and radial T velocity among extra-galactic nebulae’’ marked a turning point in un- derstanding the universe. In this brief report, Hubble laid out the evidence for one of the great discoveries in 20th cen- tury science: the expanding universe. Hubble showed that galaxies recede from us in all directions and more dis- tant ones recede more rapidly in pro- portion to their distance. His graph of velocity against distance (Fig. 1) is the original Hubble diagram; the equation that describes the linear fit, velocity ϭ ϫ Ho distance, is Hubble’s Law; the slope of that line is the Hubble con- ͞ stant, Ho; and 1 Ho is the Hubble time.
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Under the Hood
    Baryon acoustic oscillations! under the hood Martin White UC Berkeley/LBNL Santa Fe, NM July 2010 Acoustic oscillations seen! First “compression”, at kcstls=π. Density maxm, velocity null. Velocity maximum First “rarefaction” peak at kcstls=2π Acoustic scale is set by the sound horizon at last scattering: s = cstls CMB calibration • Not coincidentally the sound horizon is extremely well determined by the structure of the acoustic peaks in the CMB. WMAP 5th yr data Dominated by uncertainty in ρm from poor constraints near 3rd peak in CMB spectrum. (Planck will nail this!) Baryon oscillations in P(k) • Since the baryons contribute ~15% of the total matter density, the total gravitational potential is affected by the acoustic oscillations with scale set by s. • This leads to small oscillations in the matter power spectrum P(k). – No longer order unity, like in the CMB – Now suppressed by Ωb/Ωm ~ 0.1 • Note: all of the matter sees the acoustic oscillations, not just the baryons. Baryon (acoustic) oscillations RMS fluctuation Wavenumber Divide out the gross trend … A damped, almost harmonic sequence of “wiggles” in the power spectrum of the mass perturbations of amplitude O(10%). Higher order effects • The matter and radiation oscillations are not in phase, and the phase shift depends on k. • There is a subtle shift in the oscillations with k due to the fact that the universe is expanding and becoming more matter dominated. • The finite duration of decoupling and rapid change in mfp means the damping of the oscillations on small scales is not a simple Gaussian shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Time in Cosmology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Philsci-Archive Time in Cosmology Craig Callender∗ C. D. McCoyy 21 August 2017 Readers familiar with the workhorse of cosmology, the hot big bang model, may think that cosmology raises little of interest about time. As cosmological models are just relativistic spacetimes, time is under- stood just as it is in relativity theory, and all cosmology adds is a few bells and whistles such as inflation and the big bang and no more. The aim of this chapter is to show that this opinion is not completely right...and may well be dead wrong. In our survey, we show how the hot big bang model invites deep questions about the nature of time, how inflationary cosmology has led to interesting new perspectives on time, and how cosmological speculation continues to entertain dramatically different models of time altogether. Together these issues indicate that the philosopher interested in the nature of time would do well to know a little about modern cosmology. Different claims about time have long been at the heart of cosmology. Ancient creation myths disagree over whether time is finite or infinite, linear or circular. This speculation led to Kant complaining in his famous antinomies that metaphysical reasoning about the nature of time leads to a “euthanasia of reason”. But neither Kant’s worry nor cosmology becoming a modern science succeeded in ending the speculation. Einstein’s first model of the universe portrays a temporally infinite universe, where space is edgeless and its material contents unchanging.
    [Show full text]