DOCSLIB.ORG

New Perspectives on the Ancient Maya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Perspectives on the Ancient Maya Perspective Peopling the past: New perspectives on the ancient Maya Cynthia Robin* Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1810 Hinman Avenue, Evanston, IL 60208 The new direction in Maya archaeology is toward achieving a greater understanding of the Maya area and in highland Mexico, people and their roles and their relations in the past. To answer emerging humanistic near the city of Teotihuacan. Stylistically, questions about ancient people’s lives Mayanists are increasingly making use of new and the vessels in Yax K’uk’ Mo’s tomb resem- existing scientific methods from archaeology and other disciplines. Maya archaeology is ble those of royal tombs from the Maya bridging the divide between the humanities and sciences to answer questions about cities of Tikal and Kaminaljuyu. To date, ancient people previously considered beyond the realm of archaeological knowledge. the study of epigraphy, bone chemistry, and ceramic chemistry at Copa´n combine uestions about time, space, and peo- tem. Classic Maya rulers recorded ver- to provide an unusual glimpse into Yax ple form the core of the social sci- sions of their life histories in hieroglyphic Q K’uk’ Mo’s personal origins and suggest ences. Given the material and spatial na- texts and images inscribed throughout close, and likely face-to-face, interaction ture of the archaeological record, their cities. These public narratives com- among ancient Maya elites. archaeologists have always been at the bined history, worldview, and personal The analysis of burials, from social and forefront of research on time and space. and political goals, strategies, and agen- bioarchaeological perspectives, has always Over the past century Maya archaeolo- das. They provide personalized glimpses been a critical means for archaeologists to gists have developed a deep understand- into the lives of rulers and other elites.‡ ing of the duration and spatial extent of assess past people—rich and poor. Maya occupation in the Maya area [which ex- Finding Out About the People burial studies are particularly illuminating tends at least as far back as the Paleo- An example of the new multidisciplinary because the ancient Maya typically buried Indian period ca. 10,000 before Christ and work in Maya archaeology comes from the people in the floors of their houses, rather includes what is now Guatemala, Belize, Early Copa´n Acropolis Project, directed than in cemeteries. Like archaeologists southern Mexico, western Honduras, and by Robert Sharer. Excavations in the civic- studying cemeteries, Mayanists have ana- El Salvador; Fig. 1 (1–4)].† The new di- ceremonial heart of this ancient city in lyzed burials to examine how personhood rection in Maya archaeology, and archae- Honduras located the tomb of a male (self, gender, sexuality, age, beauty) inter- ology in general, is toward a greater un- considered to be the dynastic founder, sect with socio-economic (status, diet, derstanding of people in the past (5). The Yax K’uk’ Mo’. Throughout world histo- health), political, and religious dimensions fundamental, but inanimate, questions of ry—and Copa´n is no exception here— of life. But because people were buried in what, when, and where, are being comple- kings have sought to legitimate their the floors of their houses, Mayanists also mented by animate questions of how, why, power by claiming to have arrived from a can use burial analyses to reconstruct fam- by whom, and with what meaning. distant realm. In one of his inscriptions, ily grouping and from these infer kin This study of a peopled past brings to Copa´n’sfounder seems to make such a organization and relationships (9, 10). the interpretive foreground what we have claim. Archaeologists and historians often Even from some of the humblest house- always known: the disembodied materials have been baffled to determine the truth holds, Patricia McAnany has discerned that constitute the contemporary archae- behind such statements. Did the king re- from distinctive patterning in the form ological record are simply the remains of ally come from afar? Or was he just using and location of interments how ordinary once active ancient landscapes. To answer that claim to legitimate his power? How people revered the important personages humanistic questions about the lives of would we know if all we have access to, (ancestors) from their kin group (11). ancient people Maya archaeologists are beyond the claim, is the buried remains of Even more intimate details of people’s increasingly making use of new and exist- the king’s body? Jane Buikstra’s innova- lives are now being gleaned through new ing scientific methods to complement tive application of strontium isotope ratio applications of existing bioarchaeological more conventional archaeological and art analysis on Yax K’uk’ Mo’s remains de- techniques. Lori Wright and Francisco historical analyses. This multidisciplinary termined both that Yax K’uk’ Mo’ had Chew have used collagen analysis in infant research bridges the divide between the arrived at Copa´n in late adulthood and bones and stable oxygen isotope ratios of humanities and sciences. It enables ar- had likely come from the Pete´n area of adult tooth enamel to determine how long chaeologists to propose answers to ques- Guatemala, where the major Maya city of women living in the Dos Pilas region of tions previously considered beyond the Tikal is located (7). Corroborating evi- Guatemala breast fed their children (12). realm of archaeological knowledge— dence for Yax K’uk’ Mo’s extensive net- questions about people’s life cycles and work of long-distance communications life histories, and their perceptions of the comes from Ellen Bell, Dorie Reents- *E-mail: [email protected]. world. Another significant breakthrough Budet, and Ron Bishop’s neutron activa- †I refer readers to the aforementioned reviews for more in the ability of archaeologists to under- tion analysis of the ceramic offerings from extensive bibliographies than space permits here. stand ancient Maya people has been the his tomb (8). The tomb contained locally ‡A review of recent research in Maya epigraphy would require a separate article. For an overview of recent re- decipherment of the Classic (anno Domini manufactured vessels, as well as those search see ref. 6. Herein I will reference epigraphic research 250–900) Maya hieroglyphic writing sys- manufactured in various other locales in as it is part of multidisciplinary research programs. 18–21 ͉ PNAS ͉ January 2, 2001 ͉ vol. 98 ͉ no. 1 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 contexts it is impossible to locate actual preserved at Cere´n we even know the types people (in human remains, images, or of wood people used in construction and the texts). Peopling the past is about under- range of food they planted, ate, and pre- standing the interconnections between sumably traded or provided as tribute (42). people and other aspects of social life. Interestingly, the residents of Cere´n’s hum- Whether or not we can find people in the ble households had sufficient housing, a archaeological record, we can infer their good food supply, and an elaborate aesthetic presence, roles, and relations. In Maya sense (which included objects of their own studies, as in archaeological research manufacture as well as highly regarded ob- around the world, the development of jects acquired from elsewhere). Indeed the household, community, and settlement ar- quality of life for ancient Cere´n inhabitants chaeology has been a springboard for was much better than that of contemporary analyses of a peopled past. It has now been rural El Salvadoraneos. But Sheets (22) many decades since Maya archaeology cautions us not to see Cere´n as a ‘‘Garden of deserved its old stereotype of being ‘‘the Eden.’’ Cere´n’sinhabitants were not eco- archaeology of temples and tombs.’’ From nomically self-sufficient. Many of their daily the 1960s onward the pioneering work of essentials came from elsewhere and their Gordon Willey and Wendy Ashmore, local resources were hardly equal to those of among many others, has inspired new the higher status people with whom they generations of archaeological research interacted. into the places where people really lived: Given the poor preservation in the trop- households, communities, and settle- ics, we usually can’t assess the richness of ments (19–21). To illustrate this research people’s everyday lives the way we can at I discuss below two household archaeol- Cere´n.But Mayanists are turning to more Fig. 1. Map of the Maya area showing major sites ogy case studies, one from the Cere´n extensive excavations of households, and and sites mentioned in the text. Project directed by Payson Sheets (22, 23), even whole neighborhoods and communi- and the other from the Xunantunich Ar- ties, to collect more comprehensive infor- chaeological Project, directed by Richard mation on people’s everyday lives. Even at The up to 4 years of ancient mothers’ Leventhal and Wendy Ashmore (24–28). Cere´n,the excavation of a house in isolation breast feeding is more than twice as long The rural village of Cere´n in El Salva- or the excavation of a test pit (a small, often as contemporary breast feeding. Intrigu- dor is the Pompeii of the New World. no larger than2mby2m,excavation ingly, the Classic period adults of this area Around anno Domini 600 the Loma resembling a telephone booth) into a house, survived childhood anemia to a much Caldera volcano erupted, burying Cere´n would not provide sufficient evidence for greater extent than contemporary people documenting everyday life. We conducted survive this disease. This leads Wright and below 5 meters of ash. Because the erup- tion was sudden, Cere´n’s inhabitants extensive excavations of rural settlements Chew to the seemingly counterintuitive ANTHROPOLOGY could only run from the village and had to throughout the Xunantunich polity in Bel- conclusion that ancient Maya children ize, in conjunction with excavations within were living under healthier conditions leave their possessions behind.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • With the Protection of the Gods: an Interpretation of the Protector Figure in Classic Maya Iconography
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 With The Protection Of The Gods: An Interpretation Of The Protector Figure In Classic Maya Iconography Tiffany M. Lindley University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Lindley, Tiffany M., "With The Protection Of The Gods: An Interpretation Of The Protector Figure In Classic Maya Iconography" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2148. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2148 WITH THE PROTECTION OF THE GODS: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE PROTECTOR FIGURE IN CLASSIC MAYA ICONOGRAPHY by TIFFANY M. LINDLEY B.A. University of Alabama, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2012 © 2012 Tiffany M. Lindley ii ABSTRACT Iconography encapsulates the cultural knowledge of a civilization. The ancient Maya of Mesoamerica utilized iconography to express ideological beliefs, as well as political events and histories. An ideology heavily based on the presence of an Otherworld is visible in elaborate Maya iconography. Motifs and themes can be manipulated to convey different meanings based on context.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rulers of Palenque a Beginner’S Guide
    The Rulers of Palenque A Beginner’s Guide By Joel Skidmore With illustrations by Merle Greene Robertson Citation: 2008 The Rulers of Palenque: A Beginner’s Guide. Third edition. Mesoweb: www. mesoweb.com/palenque/resources/rulers/PalenqueRulers-03.pdf. Publication history: The first edition of this work, in html format, was published in 2000. The second was published in 2007, when the revised edition of Martin and Grube’s Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens was still in press, and this third conforms to the final publica- tion (Martin and Grube 2008). To check for a more recent edition, see: www.mesoweb.com/palenque/resources/rulers/rulers.html. Copyright notice: All drawings by Merle Greene Robertson unless otherwise noted. Mesoweb Publications The Rulers of Palenque INTRODUCTION The unsung pioneer in the study of Palenque’s dynastic history is Heinrich Berlin, who in three seminal studies (Berlin 1959, 1965, 1968) provided the essential outline of the dynasty and explicitly identified the name glyphs and likely accession dates of the major Early and Late Classic rulers (Stuart 2005:148-149). More prominent and well deserved credit has gone to Linda Schele and Peter Mathews (1974), who summarized the rulers of Palenque’s Late Classic and gave them working names in Ch’ol Mayan (Stuart 2005:149). The present work is partly based on the transcript by Phil Wanyerka of a hieroglyphic workshop presented by Schele and Mathews at the 1993 Maya Meet- ings at Texas (Schele and Mathews 1993). Essential recourse has also been made to the insights and decipherments of David Stuart, who made his first Palenque Round Table presentation in 1978 at the age of twelve (Stuart 1979) and has recently advanced our understanding of Palenque and its rulers immeasurably (Stuart 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Maya Palace As a Political Theater
    13 THE CLASSIC MAYA PALACE AS A POLITICAL THEATER Takeshi INOMATA University of Arizona INTRODUCTION Maya archaeologists have long been fascinated by large, elaborate buildings usually called «palaces.» Archaeological evidence indicates that many «pala- ces» were residences of the ruling elite. I argue that palaces were also theatrical spaces where courtly performances took place. These buildings physically and symbolically shaped the forms of interaction and display. Thus, the examination of palace layouts provides important clues concerning patterns of political and ce- remonial interaction and the nature of rulership. In this paper, I examine the Classic Maya royal palace as a political theater through an analysis of data from Aguateca, and discuss its implications for kingship and politics. THE CONCEPTS OF PALACE AND ELITE RESIDENCE I use the following terminology related to the concept of palace. The term pa- lace-type structure is defined in terms of its morphological attributes regardless of its function—a large, elaborate multi-chamber or gallery building (Andrews 1975: 43). The tenn elite residence is based strictly on its function and does not concern its morphological attributes —a building occupied by elites (see Inoma- ta and Triadan n.d. for the concepts of elite and elite residence). The term palace refers to an elite residence or elite residential complex that is large and elaborate. In this use, the term palace overlaps semantically with the terms palace-type structure and elite residence, but they are not synonymous. There may have exis- ted palace-type buildings that were occupied by non-elites or that did not have re- sidential functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Maya? by Robert Sharer
    Who Were the Maya? BY ROBERT SHARER he ancient maya created one of the Belize, Honduras, and El Salvador until the Spanish Conquest. world’s most brilliant and successful The brutal subjugation of the Maya people by the Spanish ca. 1470 CE civilizations. But 500 years ago, after the extinguished a series of independent Maya states with roots The Kaqchikel Maya establish a new Spaniards “discovered” the Maya, many as far back as 1000 BCE. Over the following 2,500 years scores highland kingdom with a capital at Iximche. could not believe that Native Americans of Maya polities rose and fell, some larger and more powerful had developed cities, writing, art, and than others. Most of these kingdoms existed for hundreds of ca. 1185–1204 CE otherT hallmarks of civilization. Consequently, 16th century years; a few endured for a thousand years or more. K’atun 8 Ajaw Europeans readily accepted the myth that the Maya and other To understand and follow this long development, Maya Founding of the city of Mayapan. indigenous civilizations were transplanted to the Americas by civilization is divided into three periods: the Preclassic, the “lost” Old World migrations before 1492. Of course archaeol- Classic, and the Postclassic. The Preclassic includes the ori- ogy has found no evidence to suggest that Old World intru- gins and apogee of the first Maya kingdoms from about 1000 sions brought civilization to the Maya or to any other Pre- BCE to 250 CE. The Early Preclassic (ca. 2000–1000 BCE) Columbian society. In fact, the evidence clearly shows that pre-dates the rise of the first kingdoms, so the span that civilization evolved in the Americas due to the efforts of the began by ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayeb Notes No. 37
    f No. 37, 2011 WAYEB NOTES ISSN 1379-8286 A LOOK AT THE ENIGMATIC "GI TITLE" ASSOCIATED WITH THE MAYA WOMEN Boguchwała Tuszyńska Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Many different titles used by the ancient Maya kings and nobles still remain poorly understood. Even if epigraphers are able to transliterate and transcribe some of them, their exact meaning and significance is not clear to us. It seems still more complicated in the case of titles that have not been fully deciphered, though at times it is possible to establish for what reason a specific title was held by a specific person. Such is the case with the so-called “vase title” (Proskouriakoff 1961). Even without an exact reading we know that this title was associated with Goddess O and was used by the Maya to designate married women, able to give birth (Colas 2004: xxiii). In the case of Maya women we have another enigmatic “godly title” found only in a few Classic period texts, known as the “GI title”. The title consists of three signs: 1) the undeciphered sign T217d, 2) the logogram T4 NAH and 3) the glyph representing the head of GI. The title is found in a few Early Classic texts (Boot 2001, Stuart 2005: 121) and Linda Schele considered it one of the name phrases of GI (Schele 1994). There are some glyphic variations of the title (Figure 1). The “hand” sign and the glyph NAH are sometimes accompanied only by the so-called “dotted” ajaw. In another example the “hand” sign and the logogram NAH are accompanied by the ajaw sign and the head of GI, and finally we have the “hand” sign attached to the logogram NAH and the head of GI.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceremonial Plazas in the Cival Region, Guatemala
    Monumental Foundations: An Investigation of the Preclassic Development of Civic- Ceremonial Plazas in the Cival Region, Guatemala by Kaitlin R. Ahern May 2020 A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology This page is intentionally left blank. ii Copyright by Kaitlin R. Ahern 2020 II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: There is a long list of individuals and organizations that have both contributed to my formation as both an archaeologist and as a scholar. I am immensely grateful to my advisor, Dr. Timothy Chevral and committee members Dr. Douglas Perrelli and Dr. Sarunas Milisauskas, for their guidance and assistance in the completion of my doctorate. I am thankful to Warren Barbour for warmly accepting me into the Master’s program at the University at Buffalo and welcoming me into UB’s Teotihuacan Archaeology Laboratory. I will always treasure my memories with him discussing the formation of cities and states, especially urban planning and Teotihuacan. He will be greatly missed. Timothy Chevral graciously became my new chair once Warren Barbour retired. Throughout my graduate school education, he taught a wide array of courses that served to enrich my anthropological and archaeological understanding. His courses also greatly enhanced my knowledge regarding archaeological theory and introduced me to the archaeological sciences. Douglas Perrelli provided me with a North American perspective to my research and spent time helping me prepare for my advanced exams. Sarunas Milisauskas taught me about the history of archaeology and how it has impacted archaeological approaches in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Groups”: Monumentality and Early Centers in the Middle Preclassic Maya Lowlands
    REGROUP ON “E-GROUPS”: MONUMENTALITY AND EARLY CENTERS IN THE MIDDLE PRECLASSIC MAYA LOWLANDS James A. Doyle For nearly a century, scholars have used astronomical evidence to explain the Lowland Maya architectural type known as “E-Groups” as solar observatories and, by extension, as locations for rituals related to solar and agricultural cycles. This article departs from the usual focus on the observational properties of E-Groups and places them in the context of early Maya monumentality during the Middle Preclassic period. Specifically, E-Groups are seen as the earliest monumental social spaces in the Maya Lowlands, with multifaceted functions and placements that indicate a shared social map of the land- scape. Geographic information systems viewshed analysis of Middle Preclassic E-Group sites demonstrates that popula- tions constructed E-Groups in places that maximized visibility of the nearby landscape. Viewsheds conducted at sites with Middle Preclassic E-Groups in the central Maya Lowlands suggest that the large plazas and similar monumental archi- tecture represent the centers of comparable, mutually visible communities. Settlers founding these communities consciously created distance from neighboring monumental centers, perhaps as means of defining and buttressing group identity and undergirding spatial claims to political authority. Recent archaeological evidence affords clues that such spaces were civic, allowing architectural settings for social gatherings and access to resources. Por casi cien años, diversos estudios se han basado en evidencia arqueoastronómica para tratar los complejos arquitectóni- cos del “Grupo Tipo E,” propio de las Tierras Bajas Mayas, como observatorios solares y, por consiguiente, como centros rituales relacionados con los ciclos solares y agrícolas.
    [Show full text]
  • Time, Memory, and Resilience Among the Maya
    TIME, MEMORY, AND RESILIENCE AMONG THE MAYA Prudence M. Rice Southern Illinois University, Carbondale The conservative transmission of cultural form is particularly likely where people are exposed constantly to highly visible examples of material objects invested with authoritative credibility. (Michael Rowlands 1993: 142) Collapse, far from being an anomaly... presents in dramatic form not the end of social institutions, but almost always the beginning of new ones... (Shmuel N. Eisenstadt 1988: 243) Introduction The lowland Maya are commonly thought to have experienced several collapses during the more than 1,500 years of their civilization’s existence. Maya scholars and the general public alike have been especially captivated by notions of the “mysterious Maya” and their Classic civilization evolving in the tropical forests, followed by their even more mysterious ninth-century “collapse” and Postclassic “decadence.” Although certain institutions and practices ended, and many cities were abandoned through the centuries, overall there is more support for Maya cultural survival and regeneration — albeit with significant transformations — as opposed to collapse. Nonetheless, the idea of cultural resilience — of business as usual — fails to capture the collective imagination in comparison to romantic images of a vibrant civilization inexplicably succumbing to ruination in the steamy tropical jungles of Guatemala. Civilizational resilience, and particularly the millennia of Maya resilience, deserve more investigation, however, and time and memory play key roles in such cultural continuities. Here I discuss three examples: (1) the role of the cycling of time and its passage through Maya calendars, particularly the twenty-year periods known as k’atun; (2) the role of memory in Postclassic architecture in the Petén lakes region; and (3) the persistence of some long-standing symbols of Classic rulership and dynastic authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Vo. Bo. Culture-Nature
    165 Culture-Nature vs Commerce Disjunctives: Touristic Maya Train Trans-istmus Graciela Aurora Mota Botello Mega Project and its Cultural Heritage and Urban Impact in Mexico. Culture-Nature vs Commerce Disjunctives: Touristic Mayan Train Trans-Isthmus Mega Project and its Cultural Heritage and Urban Impact in Mexico. Graciela Aurora Mota Botello Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México ICICH-ICOMOS member [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper performs an holistic assessment referred to the Mayan Train project in Yucatan, Mexico. This evaluation includes 1) the impact of the construction and operation of the railroad way 2) the challenges between economic development and traditional living indigenous life 3) the demarcation of social participation in managing forecast 4) the safeguard perspective for the Mayan Intangible Heritage 5) An alternative design for better practices as a whole: train, communities and urban-tourist development. Without any rigorous popular methodologies for consultation the construction of the railroad way will increase the unfortunate collision between “culture-nature” vs “economy- innovation-technology transfer”. Looking for equity and diversity progress the edge effects caused by the Train, especially in critical areas such as the wildlife passages will change the daily sustainable life styles focused on their traditional social experiences supported on the spiritual meaning sense of housing the earth and sky as a whole, collective memory, and local dreams. Impacts of modernity will clearly change the sense of Mayan associative landscape. Urban tourist development will also have a direct impact on the occupation of natural spaces and will exacerbate the barrier and edge effects caused by the railroad way that will have an indirect effect on the habitat and original sense of the place accompanied by the new daily life urban style practices such as vehicular traffic and demand of a new infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maya Civilization Covered an Area That Today Makes up Southern Mexico and Parts of Four Countries in Central America
    World Book Student Database* ® The trusted, student-friendly online reference tool. Name: ____________________________________________________ Date:_________________ World Book Online: The Maya (MAH yuh) were an American Indian people who devel- oped a magnificent civilization in Mesoamerica, a region of Mexico and Central America. The Maya produced remarkable architecture, painting, pottery, andThe sculpture. Maya TheyCivilization also made great advance- ments in astronomy and mathematics. They were one of the first peoples in the Western Hemisphere to develop an advanced form of writing. Today, many people of Mexico and Central America still carry on some of the traditional Maya customs. First, go to www.worldbookonline.com Then, click on “Student.” If prompted, log on with your ID and Password. Use the World Book search tool to find the answers to the questions below. Since this activity is about the Maya, it is recommended you start by searching the key word “Maya.” In some questions, fill in Findthe correct It! term in the blank space to complete the sentence. In other questions, you may need to write a short paragraph to answer the question. 1. The Maya civilization covered an area that today makes up Southern Mexico and parts of four countries in Central America. These countries are: _______________________; _______________________; _______________________; and _______________________. 2. Religion was central to the daily life of the Maya people. A Maya manuscript lists more than ___________ gods that were worshipped by the Maya. 3. The Maya built large stone pyramids. How were the pyramids used? 4. Compare the special ceremonies observed after the death of Maya rulers and the common citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dedication of Tikal Temple VI
    ThePARIJournal A quarterly publication of the Ancient Cultures Institute Volume XV, No. 3, Winter 2015 In This Issue: The Dedication of Tikal TempleVI: The Dedication of Tikal Temple VI: A A Revised Chronology Revised Chronology by SIMON MARTIN University of Pennsylvania Museum Simon Martin PAGES 1-10 • The long hieroglyphic text that adorns distinctive features (Figure 1). It offers an the back and sides of Tikal Temple VI—a unusually detailed statement of relations A Skyband with building known more descriptively as between an ancestral ruler-deity and Constellations: the Temple of Inscriptions and more both contemporary and deep-time local Revisiting the Monjas East Wing prosaically as Structure 6F-27—has some monarchs. It also has a distinctive physical at Chichen Itza by Bruce Love PAGES 11-14 • In the Realm of the Witz’: Animate Rivers and Rulership among the Classic Maya by Jeremy D.Coltman PAGES 15-30 • The Further Adventures of Merle (continued) by Merle Greene Robertson PAGES 31-32 Joel Skidmore Editor Marc Zender Associate Editor The PARI Journal 202 Edgewood Avenue San Francisco, CA 94117 415-664-8889 [email protected] Electronic version available at: www.precolumbia.org/ pari/journal/1503 Figure 1. The rear façade of Tikal Temple VI (Structure 6F-27). Photograph by Jorge ISSN 1531-5398 Pérez de Lara. The PARI Journal 15(3):1-10 © 2015 Ancient Cultures Institute 1 Martin character since, with constituent blocks measuring as BCE), and 9.4.0.0.0 (514 CE), before damage robs us of much as 85 cm across, it boasts the largest hieroglyphs in reliable or legible dates until firm ground returns in the the Maya world.
    [Show full text]