Silica Precursor Effect on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Cobalt Incorportated MCM-41 Catalysts and Their Performance Towards Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Silica Precursor Effect on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Cobalt Incorportated MCM-41 Catalysts and Their Performance Towards Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes Journal of C Carbon Research Article Silica Precursor Effect on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Cobalt Incorportated MCM-41 Catalysts and Their Performance towards Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes Frank Ramírez Rodríguez 1,* ID , Luis Fernando Giraldo 2 and Betty Lucy Lopez 1 1 Grupo de Investigación Ciencia de los Materiales, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 70 N◦ 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio de Investigación en Polímeros, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 70 N◦ 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +574-219-6546 Received: 22 December 2017; Accepted: 2 February 2018; Published: 22 February 2018 Abstract: In this work, mesoporous silica (MCM-41) and a cobalt-incorporated catalyst (Co-MCM-41) were prepared using colloidal silica Cab-O-Sil, sodium silicate and tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) as the silica sources and cobalt nitrate as the cobalt source. Their physicochemical properties were analyzed, and their catalytic performance for the synthesis of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) during chemical vapor deposition (CCVD) of methane was evaluated. When Cab-O-Sil was used, it was possible to incorporate 3% (nominal) cobalt with a good dispersion and without losing mesoporosity, resulting in minimal formation of superficial cobalt oxide. In contrast, the other catalysts product superficial cobalt oxide, according to the temperature programmed reduction (TPR) analysis. Co-MCM-41 prepared using Cab-O-Sil showed the best performance during the formation of SWCNT with a good regularity and selectivity without forming multi-wall carbon nanotubes or amorphous carbon structures. Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis; cobalt incorporated MCM-41; chemical vapor deposition; single wall carbon nanotubes 1. Introduction Mesoporous silica, containing pores less than 50 nm [1], has been used as catalytic support for a variety of processes, such as methane reforming [2], organic chemistry transformations [3], and single-wall carbon nanotube preparation [4]. These kinds of transformations are possible given the strong chemical interactions between transition metal cations and oxygen within the silica framework that enables dispersing and stabilizing the cations in the support. The incorporation of transition metal cations can be achieved during an in-situ process in which the cation salts and silica source are mixed together in the presence of a soft-template [5]. This process leads to the isomorphic replacement of silicon by the transition metal cations in the siloxane network while maintaining the regularity of the silica structure. Specifically, cobalt, nickel, and iron [6–8] have been incorporated in mesoporous silica (MCM-41) mesoporous silica and used as catalysts for the production of single- and multi-wall carbon nanotubes [9–13]. MCM-41 supports have the ability to disperse metallic species inside their pore walls [8,10,14,15] and drive the formation of small metallic clusters confined inside their cylindrical pores [16] when the incorporated cobalt species (Cox+) is partially reduced [17]. MCM-41 has a narrow pore-size distribution [18,19] that is within the mesoporous range, and its large surface area enables good dispersion of the incorporated metal cations. Cobalt-incorporated MCM-41 catalysts can be prepared using either colloidal silica Cab-O-Sil [20], sodium silicate [6] or C 2018, 4, 16; doi:10.3390/c4010016 www.mdpi.com/journal/carbon C 2018, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 15 C 2018, 4, 16 2 of 15 41 catalysts can be prepared using either colloidal silica Cab-O-Sil [20], sodium silicate [6] or tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) (TEOS) [21] [21 ]as as the the silica silica source. source. As As far far as we as weknow, know, a comparison a comparison between between Co- Co-MCM-41-incorporatedMCM-41-incorporated catalysts catalysts prepared prepared using using diff differenterent silica silica sources sources has has not not been been performed; therefore, in this study, MCM-41-based mesoporous catalysts we werere synthesized using sodium sodium silicate, silicate, colloidal silica Cab-O-Sil, and TEOS as silica sources, and they were doped with cobalt by means of in-situ incorporation.incorporation. Then,Then, eacheach catalyst catalyst was was tested tested during during the the chemical chemical vapor vapor deposition deposition (CCVD) (CCVD) of methaneof methane to produceto produce single-wall single-wall carbon carbon nanotubes nanotube (SWCNT),s (SWCNT), and and the the support support role role of theof the catalysts catalysts on theon the selectivity selectivity and and yield yield of theof the SWCNT SWCNT synthesis synthesis was was determined. determined. 2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Silica Characterization Figure1 1 shows shows thethe adsorptionadsorption isothermsisotherms ofof thethe silicasilica synthesizedsynthesized startingstarting atat pHpH 10.010.0 andand 11.511.5 with the different silicasilica sources;sources; all nitrogennitrogen adsorptionadsorption profilesprofiles correspondedcorresponded to type–IV isotherms according to the International Union of Pure and Ap Appliedplied Chemistry (IUPAC) (IUPAC) assignation [1], [1], that is, the materials had a narrow mesoporousmesoporous porepore size,size, exceptexcept forfor thethe S11.5S11.5 sample.sample. Figure 1. (A)N2 adsorption isotherms of the silica supports; (B) Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size distributions. Figure 1. (A) N2 adsorption isotherms of the silica supports; (B) Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size distributions. The S11.5 did not show a capillary condensation step (P/P0 0.25–0.35); this suggests that the structureThe S11.5 of this did silica not was show not a mesoporous, capillary condensation this behavior step may (P/P be0 related 0.25–0.35); to a lowthis polycondensationsuggests that the degreestructure conducting of this silica to anwas amorphous not mesoporous, material this after behavior organic may materials be related removal to a low [22]. polycondensation However, for the synthesisdegree conducting at pH 10.0, to the an mesostructureamorphous material was highly after ordered, organic asmaterials confirmed removal from the [22]. results However, summarized for the insynthesis Table1, inat whichpH 10.0, the slopethe meso of thestructure capillary was condensation highly ordered, step ofas S10.0 confirmed is the highest; from the the results slope issummarized directly related in Table to the1, in homogeneity which the slope of the of porousthe capi structure.llary condensation In contrast, step the of S10.0 mesoporous is the highest; silicas preparedthe slope withis directly TEOS related exhibited to the a narrow homogeneity pore size of distribution the porous structure. and large slope,In contrast, with athe larger mesoporous slope for thesilicas synthesis prepared at pHwith 11.5. TEOS However, exhibited the a surfacenarrow areaspore ofsize C11.5 distribution and S10.5 and had large the largestslope, with surface a larger area, whichslope for is an the important synthesis factor at pH in 11.5. designing However, mesoporous the surface materials areas withof C11.5 high and metal S10.5 dispersion had the and largest thus thesurface needed area, activity which towards is an important SWCNT [ 14factor]. in designing mesoporous materials with high metal dispersion and thus the needed activity towards SWCNT [14]. Table 1. Nitrogen physisorption results. FWHM: full width at maximum height. Table 1. Nitrogen physisorption2 −1 results. FWHM: full width at maximum height. Silica SA (m g ) Dp (nm) DP FWMH (nm) C11.5Silica SA 1239.6 (m2g−1)Dp (nm) D 2.3P FWMH (nm) 0.48 S10.0C11.5 1239.6 1080.2 2.3 2.50.48 0.25 T10.0S10.0 1080.2 902.3 2.5 2.60.25 0.16 T11.5 899.6 2.5 0.16 T10.0 902.3 2.6 0.16 T11.5 899.6 2.5 0.16 Figure2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of mesoporous silica MCM-41. We can observe the characteristic reflections, (100), (110), and (200), and the higher in-plane reflection (210). C 2018, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15 C 2018, 4, 16 3 of 15 Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of mesoporous silica MCM-41. We can observe the characteristic reflections, (100), (110), and (200), and the higher in-plane reflection (210). ThisThis last last reflection reflection is only is only present present in the in highly the high orderedly ordered structures, structures, such as thesuch T10.0 as the and T10.0 T11.5 samples.and T11.5 Thesamples. intensity The and intensity the full widthand the at maximumfull width height at ma (FWMH)ximum height are parameters (FWMH) thatare areparameters directly relatedthat are withdirectly the structural related with regularity. the structur The higheral regularity. the intensity The ishigher and the the lower intensity the FWMH is and the is, the lower more the ordered FWMH andis, homogeneousthe more ordered are and the homogeneous silica pore. According are the silica to the pore. nitrogen According adsorption to the nitrogen and X-ray adsorption diffraction and patterns,X-ray diffraction the prepared patterns, silicas T10.0the prepared and T11.5 silicas showed T10.0 a higher and T11.5 structural showed order, a whilehigher S10 structural was a poorly order, organizedwhile S10 mesoporous was a poorly silica organized and S11.5 mesoporous showed a non-mesoporoussilica and S11.5 showed structure. a non-mesoporous structure. FigureFigure 2. 2.X-ray X-ray diffraction diffraction (XRD) (XRD) patterns patterns of of the the silica silica supports. supports. TableTable2 shows 2 shows the the cell cell parameters parameters and and wall wall thicknesses thicknesses calculated calculated for for each each MCM-41 MCM-41 sample. sample. AlthoughAlthough the the pore pore diameter diameter distributions distributions were were similar similar for for all all the the mesoporous mesoporous supports, supports, there there were were significantsignificant differences differences in in the the wall wall thicknesses thicknesses where where C11.5 C11.5 has has the the larger larger wall wall thickness.
Recommended publications
  • Sodium Silicate Crops
    Sodium Silicate Crops 1 Identification of Petitioned Substance 2 3 Chemical Names: CAS Numbers: 4 Sodium Silicate 1344-09-8 5 6 Other Name: Other Codes: 7 Sodium metasilicate; Sodium silicate glass; EPA PC code: 072603 (NLM, 2011a); European 8 Sodium water glass; Silicic acid, sodium salt; Inventory of Existing Commercial Chemical 9 tetrasodium orthosilicate (IPCS, 2004) Substances (EINECS) Number: 215-687-4 (IPCS, 10 2004) 11 Trade Names: 12 Waterglass, Britesil, Sikalon, Silican, Carsil, 13 Dryseq, Sodium siloconate, Star, Soluble glass, 14 Sodium polysilicate (NLM, 2011a), N® - PQ 15 Corporation (OMRI, 2011) 16 Characterization of Petitioned Substance 17 18 Composition of the Substance: 19 The basic formula of sodium silicate is Na2O· nO2Si, which represents the components of silicon dioxide (SiO2) 20 and sodium oxide (Na2O) and the varying ratios of the two in the various formulations. This ratio is commonly 21 called the molar ratio (MR), which can range from 0.5 to 4.0 for sodium silicates and varies depending on the 22 composition of the specific sodium silicate. The structural formulas of these silicates are also variable and can be 23 complex, depending on the formulation, but generally do not have distinct molecular structures (IPCS, 2004). 24 The basic structure of soluble silicates, including sodium and potassium silicates, is a trigonal planar 25 arrangement of oxygen atoms around a central silicon atom, as depicted in Figure 1 below. Physical and 26 chemical properties of sodium silicate are summarized in Table 1, on page 2. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Figure 1: Chemical Structure of Sodium Silicate (NLM, 2011a) 36 37 Specific Uses of the Substance: 38 39 Sodium silicate and other soluble silicates have been used in many industries since the early 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Spectroscopy of Sodium Silicate Glasses
    Processing and Application of Ceramics 7 [3] (2013) 117–121 DOI: 10.2298/PAC1303117M Optical spectroscopy of sodium silicate glasses prepared with nano- and micro-sized iron oxide particles Behzad Mehdikhani1,2,*, Gholam Hossein Borhani2 1Standard Research Institute, Building and Construction Department, Karaj, Iran 2Malek-e-ashtar University of Technology, Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan, Iran Received 4 June 2013; received in revised form 27 July 2013; received in revised form 4 September 2013; accepted 7 September 2013 Abstract Wet chemical analysis and UV-VIS spectroscopy methods were used to determine the oxidation state of iron in Na2O·2SiO2 glasses, containing 0.3 mol% of Fe2O3 . The oxidation state of iron in the sodium silicate glasses was varied by changing the size of iron oxide particles used for preparation of glass batches and the melting temperature. In sodium silicate glasses iron commonly exists as an equilibrium mixture of ferrous ions, Fe2+, and ferric ions Fe3+. The increase of the melting temperature led to the transformation of ferric ions to ferrous ions. It was also shown that in the glasses prepared from nano-sized iron oxide particles the Fe2+/Fe3+ equilib- rium ratio is lower (i.e. smaller amount of ferrous ions were formed) comparing to that in the glasses prepared from micro-sized iron oxide particles. Keywords: sodium silicate glass, iron oxide, UV-VIS spectroscopy, wet chemical analysis I. Introduction tant in adjusting the transmittance of glass in the wave- Iron in glasses exists as equilibrium between the yel- length regions of UV, visible light and IR [6]. The pres- low ferric ion, Fe3+, and the blue ferrous ion, Fe2+.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Adding Silica Particles on Certain Properties of Resin‑Modified Glass‑Ionomer Cement
    Published online: 2019-09-23 Original Article Effects of adding silica particles on certain properties of resin‑modified glass‑ionomer cement Nayef H. Felemban1, Mohamed I. Ebrahim2 1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia, Correspondence: Dr. Nayef H. Felemban 2Department Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Email: [email protected] Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of incorporation of silica particles with different concentrations on some properties of resin‑modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC): Microleakage, compressive strength, tensile strength, water sorption, and solubility. Materials and Methods: Silica particle was incorporated into RMGIC powder to study its effects, one type of RMGIC (Type II visible light-cured) and three concentrations of silica particles (0.06, 0.08, and 0.1% weight) were used. One hundred and twenty specimens were fabricated for measuring microleakage, compressive strength, tensile strength, water sorption, and solubility. Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests were used for measuring significance between means where P ≤ 0.05. Results: RMGIC specimens without any additives showed significantly highest microleakage and lowest compressive and tensile strengths. Conclusion: Silica particles added to RMGIC have the potential as a reliable restorative material with increased compressive strength, tensile strength, and water sorption but decreased microleakage and water solubility. Key words: Class V, glass-ionomer, microleakage, silica particle, teeth restoration INTRODUCTION acquire chemical adhesion and antibacterial properties from GICs, but from resin composites, RMGICs Incorporation of photopolymerizable components into acquire many properties such as setting behavior, conventional acid‑base mixture leads to formation of good mechanical properties, and wear resistance.[2] hybrid materials named resin‑modified glass ionomer.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Stewardship Summary Liquid Sodium Silicates
    Product Stewardship Summary Liquid Sodium Silicates Summary Sodium silicates serve a wide range of end use markets, including soaps and detergents, pulp and paper, paint and pigments, catalysts, and metal cleaning. 1. Chemical Identity Name: Sodium Silicate Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number: 1344-09-8 Sodium silicate is the generic name for a series of compounds derived from soluble sodium silicate glasses. These materials are aqueous liquids containing sodium oxide (Na2O) and silicon dioxide (SiO2) in various ratios. Varying the amount of SiO2 and Na2O gives solutions having differing properties and diverse industrial applications. 2. Production Sodium silicate glass is made by fusing high purity silica sand and soda ash in open hearth furnaces at 1300°C. The molten glass is cooled, fractured, and dissolved under pressure with hot water and steam. OxyChem is a leading manufacturer of sodium silicates and operates facilities in Augusta, GA; Chicago, IL; Cincinnati, OH; Dallas, TX; and Mobile, AL. 3. Uses Sodium Silicates are used in a wide variety of applications. Some of the principle uses are summarized in this section. Detergents & Soaps Many detergent operations are performed with sodium silicates. Such operations range from metal cleaning and textile processing to washing laundry, dishes, dairy equipment, bottles, floors, and automobiles. Silicates are incorporated in synthetic detergent compositions to control corrosion and minimize alkali attack. Without silicates, many synthetic detergent compositions would be corrosive to aluminum, zinc, and certain metal alloy parts in washers. They may also attack porcelain enamel and overglaze fine china decorations. Adhesives and Cements Liquid sodium silicates are widely used as adhesives in making fiber drums, paper tubes, and other materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesized Mesoporous Silica and Calcium Aluminate Cement Fillers
    Dental Materials Journal 2017; 36(6): 706–713 Synthesized mesoporous silica and calcium aluminate cement fillers increased the fluoride recharge and lactic acid neutralizing ability of a resin-based pit and fissure sealant Atikom SURINTANASARN1, Krisana SIRALERTMUKUL2 and Niyom THAMRONGANANSKUL1 1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, 34 Henri-Dunant Rd., Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand 2 Metallurgy and Materials Science Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Soi Chulalongkorn 12, Phayathai Rd., Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Corresponding author, Niyom THAMRONGANANSKUL; E-mail: [email protected] This study evaluated the effect of different types of filler in a resin-based pit and fissure sealant on fluoride release, recharge, and lactic acid neutralization. Resin-based sealant was incorporated with 5% w/w of the following fillers: calcium aluminate cement (CAC), synthesized mesoporous silica (SI), a CAC and SI mixture (CAC+SI), glass-ionomer powder (GIC), and acetic acid-treated GIC (GICA). Sealant without filler served as control. The samples were immersed in deionized water or a lactic acid solution and the concentration of fluoride in the water, before and after fluoride recharge, and the lactic acid pH change, respectively, were determined. The CAC+SI group demonstrated the highest fluoride release after being recharged with fluoride gel. The CAC+SI group also demonstrated increased lactic acid pH. These findings suggest that a resin-based sealant containing synthesized mesoporous silica and calcium aluminate cement may enhance remineralization due to fluoride release and higher pH. Keywords: Calcium aluminate cement, Fluoride recharge, Fluoride release, Mesoporous silica, Pit and fissure sealant empty channels can absorb and encapsulate relatively INTRODUCTION large amounts of molecules11).
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Silicate Solution 1
    MSDS Number: S4982 * * * * * Effective Date: 03/30/11 * * * * * Supercedes: 09/23/09 Sodium Silicate Solution 1. Product Identification Synonyms: Water Glass; Soluble Glass; Silicate of Soda; Egg Preserver CAS No.: Not applicable to mixtures. Molecular Weight: Not applicable to mixtures. Chemical Formula: Na2O(SiO2)x.(H2O)x Product Codes: 3877 2. Composition/Information on Ingredients Ingredient CAS No Percent Hazardous --------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ --------- Sodium Silicate 1344-09-8 35 - 40% Yes Water 7732-18-5 60 - 65% No 3. Hazards Identification Emergency Overview -------------------------- WARNING! HARMFUL IF SWALLOWED OR INHALED. CAUSES SEVERE IRRITATION TO EYES, SKIN AND RESPIRATORY TRACT. SAF-T-DATA(tm) Ratings (Provided here for your convenience) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Health Rating: 2 - Moderate Flammability Rating: 1 - Slight Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight Contact Rating: 3 - Severe Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD; PROPER GLOVES Storage Color Code: Green (General Storage) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Potential Health Effects ---------------------------------- Diluted solutions of sodium silicate are strong alkaline irritants. The solid sodium silicate is corrosive. Exposure to alkaline corrosives may result in severe burns depending on the concentration and duration of exposure. Sodium silicate
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Sodium Silicate on the Behaviour of Shotcretes for Tunnel Lining
    Journal of Scientific Research & Reports 14(2): 1-8, 2017; Article no.JSRR.33641 ISSN: 2320-0227 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org The Effect of Sodium Silicate on the Behaviour of Shotcretes for Tunnel Lining Luigi Coppola1, Alessandra Buoso1, Denny Coffetti1, Patricia Kara2*, Sergio Lorenzi1 and Franco D’Alessandro3 1DISA, University of Bergamo, Dalmine (BG), Italy. 2EMIB, Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, Belgium. 3BASF C.C. Underground Construction, Treviso (TV), Italy. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author LC designed the study. Authors AB, DC and FDA performed the statistical analysis and wrote the protocol. Authors PK and SL managed the analyses of the study, the literature searches, wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JSRR/2017/33641 Editor(s): (1) Luigi dell'Olio, School of Civil Engineering, Channels and Ports, University of Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain. (2) Luigi Rodino, Professor of Mathematical Analysis, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Torino, Italy. Reviewers: (2) Halil Görgün, Dicle University, Turkey. (3) Leo Baldenegro, Center of Engineering and Industrial Development, Mexico. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/19001 Received 24th April 2017 th Case Study Accepted 4 May 2017 Published 10th May 2017 ABSTRACT Present case study investigates the rheological, mechanical and in-placing performances of fiber- reinforced shotcrete manufactured with different fibers (steel, glass and polypropylene) and with sodium silicate based set-accelerating admixture for tunnel linings. The study compares the performances of concretes manufactured and fully compacted with those shotcretes which are manufactured directly on the job-site.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilization of Soils with Lime and Sodium Silicate Harold Bernard Ellis Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1963 Stabilization of soils with lime and sodium silicate Harold Bernard Ellis Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Ellis, Harold Bernard, "Stabilization of soils with lime and sodium silicate " (1963). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2531. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2531 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—3867 microfilmed exactly as received ELLIS, Harold Bernard, 1917- RTAmT.T7.ATmN OF SOILS WITH LIME AND SODIUM SILICATE. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1963 Engineering, civil University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan STABILIZATION OF SOILS WITH LIME AND SODIUM SILICATE by Harold Bernard Ellis A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Soil Engineering Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major D^ tbent Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University Of
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Synthesis of Super Insulation Silica Aerogel Composites Strengthened with Mullite Fibers
    International Conference on Civil, Transportation and Environment (ICCTE 2016) Rapid synthesis of Super Insulation silica aerogel composites strengthened with mullite fibers Guangwu Liu1, a, Yangang Liu1, b 1 School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Sodium silicate; Silica aerogel; Mullite fibers; Mechanical property; Thermal conductivity; Abstract. In this study, we tried to synthesize super insulation and hydrophobic silica aerogel doped with mullite fibers (10wt %), by using cost effective processing from sodium silicate. Before dried under ambient pressure, the surfaces of the gels were modified using trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) via one-step solvent exchange and surface modification. And the proper molar ratio of TMCS to pore water is 0.02. The obtained aerogel doped with fibers exhibited excellent physical properties with less than 10% volume shrinkage, extremely high specific surface area (762 m2/g) and super hydrophobicity (contact angle of~145°). In addition, DMA and Hot-Disk results indicated that composite aerogels also with excellent performance in multitudinous physical properties, such as excellent heat insulation (0.0225 W/ (m K)) and better mechanical property (12.5 MPa). Thermal conductivity coefficients of silica aerogel monoliths changed from 0.0225 to 0.0393 W/ (m K) as temperature increased to 500°C, revealed an excellent heat insulation effect during thermal process. Introduction Silica aerogels are translucent and thermal insulating material consisting of nanoparticle building blocks, networked together to form an open, highly porous structure. They are consisting of over 95% air and <5% skeleton and possessing extremely lower density (0.003g/cm3-0.5g/cm3 range), high surface area (500-1200 m2/g), ultra-low dielectric constant (k=1.0-2.0), low index of refraction (~1.05) [1].Due to these excellent properties, silica aerogels have attracted much attention for they have potential to be applied in many fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignin Isolation and Characterization
    PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com Chemical Changes of Raw Materials and Manufactured Binderless Boards during Hot Pressing: Lignin Isolation and Characterization Yong-Chang Sun,a,# Zhi Lin,b,# Wan-Xi Peng,b,* Tong-Qi Yuan,a Feng Xu,a Yi-Qiang Wu,b Jing Yang,c Yang-Sheng Wang,d and Run-Cang Sun a,* Thermomechanical pulp (TMP) is used for fiber production in binderless boards industries. Milled wood lignin (MWL) and enzymatic mild acidolysis lignin (EMAL) isolated from raw material and from binderless boards (BB) were comparatively analyzed to investigate the effects of chemical changes on the bonding performance in BB. The results showed that acid-insoluble lignin of the BB were increased during the sodium silicate solution pretreatment after hot-pressing. The lignin fractions obtained were characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, and 1H-13C correlation heteronuclear single-quantum coherence (HSQC) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Results showed that 31.1% of EMAL (based on Klason lignin) with low molecular weight (Mw=1630 g/mol) was isolated from the BB. The increased total phenolic OH groups (3.97 mmol/g) of EMAL from sodium silicate solution pretreated BB indicated that there was degradation of lignin and cleavage of lignin- carbohydrate linkages during hot-pressing. In addition, the content of β- O-4' aryl ether linkages of EMAL from the BB increased to 69.2%, which was higher than that of the untreated sample (60.1%). It was found that S units (syringyl-like lignin structures) were preferentially condensed by hot pressing over G (guaiacyl-like lignin structures) units, and the S/G ratio increased after the hot-pressing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium and Potassium Silicates, Is Markedly Demonstrated by Its Ability to Alter the Surface 10.000 Characteristics of Various Materials in Different Ways
    M2CO3 + x SiO2 ➡ M2O . x SiO2 + C02 (M = Na, K) Introduction Contents PQ Europe represents the European subsidiary of 1 The production process 3 PQ Corporation, USA. PQ Corporation was founded 2 Physical properties of soluble silicates 5 in 1831 and belongs today to the world’s most - ratio succesful developers and producers of inorganic - density chemicals, in particular on the field of soluble - viscosity silicates, silica derived products and glass spheres. - potassium silicate PQ operates worldwide over 60 manufacturing plants in 20 countries. PQ serves a large variety of 3 Chemical properties of industries, including detergents, high way safety, soluble silicates 7 pulp and paper, petroleum processing and food and - pH behavior and buffering capacity beverages with a broad range of environmental - stability of silicate solutions friendly performance products. - reactions with acids (sol and gel formation) More than 150 years of experience in R&D and - reaction with acid forming products production of silicates in USA and Europe guarantee ("In-situ"gel formation) high performance and high quality silicates made - precipitation reactions, reaction with metal ions according to ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards - interaction with organic compounds and marketed via our extensive network of sales - adsorption offices, agents and distributors. - complex formation 4 Properties of potassium silicates 8 vs. sodium silicates 5 Chemistry of silicate solutions 9 6 Applications 11 7 Storing and handling of PQ Europe 14 liquid silicates - storage - pumps - handling and safety 8 Production locations 15 Sand Caustic soda PremixReactor Temporary Filter Final storage storage Water The Hydrothermal Route 2 1 Sodium and potassium silicate glasses (lumps) are The production produced by the direct fusion of precisely measured process portions of pure silica sand (SiO2) and soda ash (Na2CO3) or potash (K2CO3) in oil, gas or electrically fired furnaces at temperatures above 1000 °C according to the following reaction: M2CO3 + x SiO2 ➡ M2O .
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Silicate Lumps
    Product information Sodium Silicate Lumps Solid Sodium Silicate Characteristic physico-chemical data* Water glass is manufactured in a furnace process. Due the properties of the solid sodium silicate it can be dissolved in water Properties and test methods Unit Value and used as a raw materiall in manufacture of liquid sodium silicates. Density kg/m³ 2500 Bulk Density kg/m³ 1250 Benefits Molar Ratio nSiO2/nNa2O 3,3 Na2O % 24 Water glass Manufacture of liquid sodium silicates SiO2 % 76 pH (water suspension) 11,2 Safety and Handling *) The given data are typical values. Specifications on request. Information concerning the safety of this product is listed in the corresponding Safety Data Sheet. We recommend to read Certifications and Classifications carefully the Safety Data Sheet prior to the use of our product. Sodium Silicate Lumps Packaging and storage CAS-No. 1344-09-8 EC Number 215-687-4 For details regarding our packaging options for this product, please contact your local sales representative. Quality excellence achieved through GMPs and ISO:9001 Our silica products are inert and extremely stable chemically. certifications However, due to their high specific surface area, they can absorb Customs Tariff Code: CN 28391910 moisture and volatile organic compounds from the surrounding atmosphere. Therefore, we recommend storing the products in sealed containers in a dry, cool place, and removed from volatile organic substances. Even if a product is stored under these conditions, after a longer period it can still pick up ambient moisture over time, which could lead to its exceeding the specified moisture content. Evonik Resource Efficiency GmbH | Product information Sodium Silicate Lumps | Feb 2019 Page 1/2 This information and any recommendations, technical or otherwise, are presented in good faith and believed to be correct as of the date prepared.
    [Show full text]