DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning Management Systems Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning Management Systems Review DOODLE Learning Management Systems Review Prepared by: Greg Ketcham, Keith Landa, Kyle Brown, Ken Charuk, Tony DeFranco, Michael Heise, Ryan McCabe, Pam Youngs-Maher, Clark Shah-Nelson [February 14, 2011] Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................2 Introduction .................................................................2 The LMS Market Space ..............................................3 Product Evaluation......................................................4 Product and Vendor Profiles .......................................5 Feature Comparisons .................................................7 LMS Feature Integration Technologies.......................8 Cost Comparisons ......................................................8 Content Migration........................................................9 Overall Recommendations........................................10 Conclusion ................................................................14 DOODLE LMS Report Page 1 Executive Summary Beginning in early 2007, SUNY implemented a large scale adoption of the ANGEL Learning Management System (LMS). In 2009, the greater educational community was informed that Blackboard (Bb) had acquired ANGEL Learning, Inc. Blackboard has since announced that support for the ANGEL product line will continue through 2014. In early 2010, the SUNY Learning Network (SLN) asked the Directors of Online and Distance Learning Environments (DOODLE) to undertake a Learning Management System evaluation to address the concerns of the SUNY community regarding the future directions of SUNY supported learning management systems as the current State University of New York ANGEL contract will end in December 2011. The following report discusses the selection methodology for the systems reviewed. Analysis of the unique characteristics of the four systems evaluated follows in this report. This report summarizes the project’s overall impressions of the systems under review, and provides guidance as to which systems DOODLE believes should be supported by SUNY System Administration (via SLN, ITEC and SICAS) going forward. Introduction Under the direction of the SUNY Office of the Provost, SLN provides services to SUNY institutions in the arena of online learning. These services include application hosting and administration of the ANGEL software, end-user support via help desk services, professional development for faculty, and instructional design expertise. Each SUNY institution operates independently; students register for and receive credit from individual campuses, and courses and degree programs are maintained by each institution. Currently, 27 out of 64 SUNY units subscribe to some combination of the described SLN services. DOODLE was formed as a SUNY-wide association of distance learning administrators, with the mission of fostering knowledge-sharing and best practices for the development and support of online learning programs. The 37 DOODLE member campuses encompass the full scope of SUNY's engagement in distance learning: SLN-affiliated institutions and independent institutions that self-manage or outsource their LMS application and user support. Key to DOODLE's premise is that it is an LMS-neutral organization focused on the creation, implementation and operation of distance learning degrees, programs and courses. Online learning, as defined by the spectrum of use from a supplement to classroom based courses, through hybrid/blended courses, to fully online asynchronous learning, continues to grow dramatically for SUNY colleges. Online learning provides opportunities to improve the teaching and learning experience, reach more learners, and lower infrastructure expenses. Coupled with the fact that the current State University of New York ANGEL contract will end in December 2011, the director of SLN asked DOODLE to undertake an LMS evaluation to address the concerns of the SUNY community. With Blackboard's announcement that support for the ANGEL product line (ANGEL 7.4 and the future release of ANGEL 8.0) will continue through October 2014, this evaluation will allow SUNY to position itself to make an informed decision with ample time for each campus to undertake a migration. DOODLE LMS Report Page 2 The overall adoption rate of Blackboard family products (Blackboard, WebCT, and ANGEL) comprises over 87% of SUNY’s total usage of learning management systems. Recognizing the scope and importance of the business relationship between Blackboard and SUNY, SUNY via SLN continues ongoing negotiations for a SUNY-wide contract. The goal of this project will be to evaluate selected alternatives to Blackboard Learn. Periodic evaluation of all information technology resources on a regular basis is a prudent action by any organization. In this particular case, there are several overarching reasons that contribute to the need for this project: The requirement to reevaluate: Given the expiration of the state-wide contract with Blackboard for the ANGEL LMS in 2011, combined with end of life (EOL) for the ANGEL 7.4 and 8.0 releases in October 2014, SUNY should reevaluate all relevant and viable LMS options. The opportunity to reevaluate: The market space for learning management systems has changed dramatically since the inception of online learning offerings within SUNY. The commercial sector products have been drastically consolidated via Blackboard's acquisition of WebCT and ANGEL. In parallel, open source platforms such as Moodle and Sakai have gained significant user share in higher education as acceptance of open source software grows and product capabilities mature. The mandate to reevaluate: Online learning, via the OpenSUNY concept in Chancellor Zimpher's strategic plan, "has the potential to be America's most extensive distance learning network". SUNY's future LMS selection needs to align with this goal, and must be able to integrate with social and emerging technologies as part of the portfolio of online learning tools. We see this as an opportunity to select an LMS platform that has the ability to scale and support growth at a non-linear rate, and to determine if current LMS platforms have the flexibility to incorporate current and yet to be imagined Web 2.0 integration. The LMS Market Space State of the LMS market The 2010 Campus Computing Project recently described the LMS market space as “a market in transition”. Several factors can be seen as contributing to change in market share between (Blackboard), and its open source and commercial competitors. One obvious marker is market consolidation: Blackboard’s total market share has grown via the acquisition of WebCT in 2005, and the subsequent acquisition of ANGEL in 2009. During this time frame, acceptance and adoption of open source alternatives (primarily Moodle, with Sakai holding a minority share of open source implementations) has grown. DOODLE LMS Report Page 3 Flux in market space The Campus Computing Report (http://www.campuscomputing.net/sites/www.campuscomputing.net/files/Green- CampusComputing2010.pdf) notes that Blackboard’s total market share has decreased from 71 percent in 2005 to 57.1 percent in 2010. Open source alternatives Moodle and Sakai gained 1.6 percent in market share. This raises the question: if colleges and universities are selecting an alternative to Blackboard, why isn’t there a corresponding proportional rise in open source adoption? Interestingly, Desire2Learn, as possibly the only large-scale alternative commercial LMS vendor, has seen an 8 percent increase in adoption since 2005, bringing their market share to 10.1% - slightly larger than the combined open source segment. A varying interpretation from analyst Michael Feldstein agrees with the shift in the market away from Blackboard; Feldstein notes that the combined market share of Desire2Learn, Moodle and Sakai equals 30% of the total installed LMS base. Feldstein provides further breakdown of the data: Desire2Learn’s greatest gains are in the 2 year community college sector, while Moodle seems to the preferred transition platform for 4 year colleges. Anecdotal evidence suggests that many ANGEL campuses specifically chose ANGEL as a viable commercial alternative to Blackboard. It is extremely likely that other institutions using ANGEL today are performing similar evaluations and weighing their possible migration options. As further evidence of the rapidly changing nature of the LMS landscape, Instructure’s Canvas LMS was not considered for in-depth evaluation for this report due to the relative immaturity of the product and the company. Since that time, Instructure has signed the Utah Educational Network (UEN) as its first major consortium client, and announced (on February 1, 2011) that it would now provide an open source version of its Canvas application. Product Evaluation Product Evaluation Selection The Committee investigated and examined various proprietary and open source LMSs and identified the following products to be formally evaluated: ● Blackboard Learn ● Desire2Learn ● Moodle ● Sakai The above LMS applications were selected for evaluation based upon the following criteria: ● Viability/vibrancy/health: the above platforms demonstrate continued adoption by higher ed institutions as well as ongoing, sustained product development and support, either via the parent company (Blackboard, Desire2Learn), or via community development (Moodle, Sakai Foundation) or commercialized supported releases of open source community software (Moodlerooms, rSmart). ● Similar scale:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LMS Data Quadrant Report
    November 2019 DATA QUADRANT REPORT Education Learning Management Systems 846 8 Reviews Vendors Evaluated Education Learning Management Systems Data Quadrant Report How to Use the Report Table of Info-Tech’s Data Quadrant Reports provide a comprehensive evaluation of popular products in the Education Learning Management Systems market. This buyer’s guide is designed to help Contents prospective purchasers make better decisions by leveraging the experiences of real users. The data in this report is collected from real end users, meticulously verified for erv acity, Data Quadrant...................................................................................................................7 exhaustively analyzed, and visualized in easy to understand charts and graphs. Each product is compared and contrasted with all other vendors in their category to create a holistic, unbiased view Category Overview ......................................................................................................8 of the product landscape. Use this report to determine which product is right for your organization. For highly detailed reports Vendor Capability Summary................................................................................ 9 on individual products, see Info-Tech’s Product Scorecard. Vendor Capabilities.................................................................................................... 12 Product Feature Summary................................................................................. 24 Product Features........................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems
    Chapter 1 A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems Mümine Kaya Keleş and Selma Ayşe Özel Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/65222 Abstract In recent years, rapid developments in technology and the web have led to many changes in education. One of the most important changes in education is in the form of distance learning. Distance learning, which is used to define education where educators and learners are physically separated, is not a new concept; however, emerging technologies and the web allow web‐based distance learning and therefore increase its popularity. As a result of these developments, many universities have started to use web‐based distance learning systems to provide flexible education that is independent of time and place. In this chapter, we review all popular, widely used, and well‐known learning management systems and include detailed comparison of some of these systems to allow institutions to choose the right system for their distance education activities. Keywords: distance learning, literature review, educational research, learning manage- ment systems, Moodle 1. Introduction Distance education, which is now also referred to as distance learning or e‐learning, has existed for centuries. Although as Keegan says “the ideas surrounding the educational endeavor are somewhat similar” [1], it is not easy to find a single definition of distance education. While according to North [2], a few definitions even look to define it in terms of a single technology, according to long‐distance teaching [3], others display distance education simply as a recent development of the class into a remote location [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Learning Management Systems
    Open Source Learning Management Systems Emerging open source LMS markets Recommended LMS for each market Getting off on the right foot By Mark Aberdour Epic Technical Producer, Epic 52 Old Steine Brighton, BN1 1NH United Kingdom [email protected] www.epic.co.uk t: +44 (0) 1273 728686 f: +44 (0) 1273 821567 All rights reserved. You agree that by downloading and accessing this publication that no part of it maybe reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Epic. Full acknowledgement of author and source must be given. ©2007 Epic Reproduction without written permission is strictly forbidden - 2 - An Epic White Paper Contents Executive summary 4 A changing market 4 The oppor tunity for Open Source 5 Emerging open source LMS markets 6 Large enterprise 6 Small and medium sized business (SMB) 6 Government and public sector 7 Primary and secondary education 7 Rapid rollout 8 Market feature matrix 8 The open source landscape 10 Benefits of Open Source 10 Risks of Open Source 11 Myths of Open Source 12 Selecting an open source LMS 13 Market recommendations 15 Large enterprise 15 Small and medium sized business 17 Government and public sector 19 Primary and secondary education 21 Rapid rollout 23 A detailed look at each LMS 24 Atutor 24 DotLRN 25 Ilias 26 Moodle 27 Sakai 28 Getting off on the right foot 30 Appendix A: Active open source LMS projects 32 References 33 Other Epic e-learning white papers 35 Epic Thinking 37 Epic Arena 38 ©2007 Epic Reproduction without written permission is strictly forbidden - 3 - An Epic White Paper Executive summary If you thought that “Open source learning management system (LMS) equals Moodle”, then think again.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Print Version
    International Journal on Innovations in Online Education 1(1) 2017 BRIEF SURVEY OF ANALYTICS IN K­12 AND HIGHER EDUCATION Ananda Gunawardena, PhD Princeton University Abstract Use of computers in education is now ubiquitous. Students have access to course media through a variety of devices including PCs, tablets, and smart phones. The data generated by online learning platforms have the potential to change the way we teach and learn. In this brief survey paper, we explore the role of analytics in teaching and learning. In particular, how learning analytics can lead to educational process innovation. We will explore history, current state, tools, privacy issues, case studies, and future potential for analytics­based education. KEY WORDS: analytics, K­12, higher education, data driven, analytics driven 1. INTRODUCTION In this inaugural edition of the International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, we explore the role of analytics in teaching and learning. In particular, how learning analytics can lead to educational process innovation. Analytics is the discovery and communication of meaningful patterns in data (Wikipedia, 2001). The main goal of using analytics is to go beyond descriptive statistics to provide the best prediction of what may happen in the future. The end result is to streamline decision making and produce new insights that lead to better actions. As more and more technology is integrated into today′s instruction from K­12 to higher education to continuing education, there is an unprecedented opportunity to use analytics to make learning more effective and efficient (Campbell and Oblinger, 2007). This paper explores some current efforts in analytics­driven education and its potential as a revolutionary force to change the way we teach and learn.
    [Show full text]
  • Spying on Students: School Issued Devices and Student Privacy (EFF)
    Spying on Students SCHOOL-ISSUED DEVICES AND STUDENT PRIVACY Frida Alim, Bridge Fellow Na e Cardo!o, Se"ior Sta## A or"e$ %e""ie Ge&'art, Re(ear)'er *are" Gullo, Media Relatio"( Anal$( Amul Kalia, Anal$( A-ril 1/, 21.2 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION EFF3OR% 1 Authors: Frida Alim, Nate Cardozo, Gennie Gebhart, Karen Gullo, Amul Kalia With assistance from: Sophia Cope, Hugh D’Andrade, Jeremy Gillula, Rainey Reitman A publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2017. “Spying on Students: School-Issued Devices and Student Privacy” is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION EFF3OR% 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Part 1: Survey Results................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methods..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Respondents and Overall Trends....................................................................................................................10 Findings..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distance Learning Solutions Recommended by UNESCO
    Distance Learning Solutions recommended by UNESCO Distance Learning Solutions recommended by UNESCO Distance Learning Solutions recommended by UNESCO https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-emergencies/coronavirus-school-closures/solutions Digital learning management systems Blackboard …………………………………………………………………………..….3 CenturyTech ………………...……………………………………………..………..….4 ClassDojo ……………………………………...………………………….………...…. 5 Edmodo ……………………………………………………………………..……….….6 Edraak ………………………………………………………………………….…….….7 EkStep …………………………………………………………………………..……….8 Google Classroom ………………………………………………………..…………….9 Moodle ………………………………………………………………………….……….11 Nafham ………………………………………………………………………….……….12 Schoology …………………………………………………………………….………….13 Seesaw ……………………………………………………………………………..…….14 Skooler ………………………………………………………………………..………….15 Study Sapuri …………………………………………………………………………….16 Systems purpose-built for mobile phones Cell-Ed …………………………………………………...…………………………….17 Eneza Education …………………………………………...………………………….19 Funzi ……………………………………………………………..…………………….20 KaiOS ………………………………………………………………….……………….21 Ubongo ……………………………………………………………………..………….22 Ustad Mobile …………………………………………………………………………..2 3 Systems with strong offline functionality Can’t wait to Learn ……………………...…………………………………………….24 Kolibri ………………………………………………………………………………….25 Rumie ……………………………………….………………………………………….26 Ustad Mobile ………………………………….……………………………………….26 Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Platforms Alison ……………………………………………………………………….………….27 Coursera ……………………………………………………………………………….28 EdX ……………………………………………………………………………………..3
    [Show full text]
  • Sakai Overview (At Michigan State University)
    Sakai Overview Charles Severance Chief Architect, Sakai Project www.sakaiproject.org [email protected] www.dr-chuck.com KYOU / sakai Boundary, Situation The Sakai Project “The University of Michigan, Indiana University, MIT, Stanford, the uPortal Consortium, and the Open Knowledge Initiative (OKI) are joining forces to integrate and synchronize their considerable educational software into a pre- integrated collection of open source tools.” Sakai Project receives $2.4 million grant from Mellon Sakai Funding • Each of the 4 Core Universities Commits – 5+ developers/architects, etc. under Sakai Board project direction for 2 years – Public commitment to implement Sakai – Open/Open licensing – “Community Source” • So, overall project levels – $4.4M in institutional staff (27 FTE) – $2.4M Mellon, $300K Hewlett – Additional investment through partners What is Sakai? • Sakai is a project - a grant for two years. • Sakai is an extensible framework - provides basic capabilities to support a wide range of tools and services • Sakai is a set of tools - written and supported by various groups • Sakai is a product - a released bundle of the framework and a set of tools which have been tested and released as a unit The Sakai Project Goals of the Sakai Project • Develop an open-source collaborative learning environment – Suitable for use as a learning management system – Suitable for use as a small group collaboration system – Suitable for building research collaboratories – Improve teaching and learning by providing a rich and extensible environment –
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae – September 2020
    VON UNDEL E ​ Z Iacocca​ Hall,​ 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015 • 610-390-3521 • [email protected] • ​ ​ https://about.me/ezundel ACCOMPLISHMENTS Online program developer in K12 and Higher Ed environments Online/blended learning expert Educational technology staff developer for over 20 years Project manager for educational initiatives (including 1:1 learning initiatives) Technical support professional specializing in educational computing environments EDUCATION East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, PA, Online Teaching Endorsement Certificate, January 2015 - Present DeSales University, Center Valley, PA, Instructional Technology Specialist Certificate, May 2003- December 2004 Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA, Masters of Science in Education, January 1997- December 1999 Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA, Bachelor’s of Science in Secondary Education, Spanish, August 1990 - December 1993 OTHER TRAININGS/RECOGNITIONS Schoology Ambassador, 2019-2021 Certified ISTE Educator, December 2019 Google Educator, Online, August 2013 NASA Explorer School Robotics Training, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Pasadena, CA), June 2007 Understanding by Design (UbD) with Jay McTighe , IU20, June 2007 EMPLOYMENT Adjunct Professor, Lehigh University, College of Education, Bethlehem, PA, August 2016 - Present TLT 472 - Online Teaching & Learning, Fall 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 TLT 470 - Teaching & Learning with Technology, Fall 2020 Technology Integration Specialist (High Schools), Bethlehem Area School District, Bethlehem, PA, August 2013 - Present
    [Show full text]
  • View Booklet
    VIRTUAL THE LATEST TRENDS IN TECH NETWORK WITH YOUR PEERS SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WELCOME Welcome to the 2021 West Virginia Statewide Wednesday’s sessions will begin at 9am, with the Technology Conference! We are very pleased that you closing keynote session by Dr. John Spencer. After a could join us for this virtual event. short break for lunch, we will resume sessions at 1pm and end the conference at 4pm. The conference will begin on Monday morning, with a wide selection of round table and panel sessions to The vendor sites will be available throughout the choose from. We will have a lunch break from 12-1pm, conference, so please take the time to visit them at your and at 1pm, we will hear from our opening keynote leisure. speaker, Dr. Alec Couros, after a short introduction from WVNET Director, Dr. Carl Powell. Monday afternoon, we We wish you a very successful and productive will continue with a variety of sessions to choose from. conference experience, and hope you will join us for a face-to-face conference in 2022! Tuesday’s agenda will consist of sessions from 9am until 12pm, with poster sessions from 11-12. We will break Best Regards, for lunch at noon and resume with sessions scheduled West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference from 1-4pm. Committee 2021 4 Sarah Barnes Tracey Beckley Lisa Bridges Harmony Garletts 2021 WVSTC CONFERENCE Tiffany Goff Nathan Justice Michelle Liga Annaliza Marks Cory Morrison Suma Ponnam MEMBERS Phil Snitz COMMITTEE 5 CONTENTS Sponsor Acknowledgments/Special Thanks to Our Premium Level Sponsors ...................7 Keynote Speakers ........................................................................................................................9 Sessions Schedule ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining Academic Standard and Utilizing Online Teaching in Vocational Technical Education: the Nigerian Perspective
    International Journal of Agricultural and Home Economics Education (IJAHEE) Volume 8, Number 1 (April 2021) ISSN: 2449-1519 www.ijvocter.com Maintaining Academic Standard and Utilizing Online Teaching in Vocational Technical Education: The Nigerian Perspective Olowa, Olatomide Waheed, Olowa, Omowumi Ayodele and Umoru, John Issah Department of Agricultural Education, Federal College of Education (Technical) Akoka, Nigeria Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract The construct of this paper is to dissect the interplay between teachers, their practice, and their teaching context through reconnoiter in relationships between conceptions of teaching, teaching context, and enacted practice, and the classification of pedagogy as teacher-centred or student-centred. This discourse is then situated within a wholly online vocational technical education teaching context bringing Nigeria into perspective. The idea is that the teacher is central to the introduction and use of online pedagogical mode, and any discourse on online teaching that excluded the teacher’s nature and teaching characteristics would be a nirvana. The paper also articulates the classification of online or information, communication, technology teaching facilities and decried the absence of concise national policy and inadequate online teaching resources, because entrenching quality or maintaining standard is possible when all rightful provisions for the functionality of online teaching has been made, as something cannot be built on nothing. Key words: Online teaching, vocational technical education, Teachers, information, communication technology, Nigeria Introduction The onset of the novel corona virus made everything from world economies to social activities devastated and necessitating the enactment of many protocols and regulations targeted at its containment. To this end, precautionary measures such as maintaining social distancing, following medically instructed quarantine process, and embracing hygiene and sanitation were enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • LMS Task Force Final Report
    REPORT LMS Exploratory Task Force, 2010-2011 August 13, 2011 Task Force Members: Lorna Wong (Chair), UW System Administration Barbara Barnet, UW-Platteville Jeff Bohrer, UW-Madison Rovy Branon, UW-Extension Jane Henderson, UW-Stout Peter Mann, UW-Madison Sharon McCarragher, UW-Milwaukee Andy Speth, UW-Green Bay Dan Voeks, UW-Madison Jim Winship, UW-Whitewater Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 5 LMS Landscape ..................................................................................................................... 7 Faculty Needs Assessment ............................................................................................ 11 Student Needs Assessment ........................................................................................... 15 Emerging Trends .............................................................................................................. 18 Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................... 25 Appendix 1 – Learn@UW Usage .................................................................................. 26 Appendix 2 – LMS Market Share for Number of Students ................................... 27 Appendix 3 – LMS Market Share for All Institutions ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lms Market Dynamics
    BIG PICTURE LMS MARKET DYNAMICS Spring 2016 Edition Provided by MindWires LLC http://www.mindwires.com/ Powered by: by © 2016, MindWires LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or sharing is strictly prohibited (see http://mfeldstein.com/lms-subscription-terms-conditions/ for details). Information is based on best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. MindWires is a trademark of MindWires LLC. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. To purchase additional subscriptions for access to this report, go to http://mfeldstein.com/lms-subscription/. LMS MARKET DYNAMICS | 2 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Purpose and Organization of Report 3 Executive Summary 4 Past to Present 5 Section Summary 5 The Past: The Shaping of a Market 5 The Road to Now: A Market in Transition 10 Market Share Today 16 Some Open Questions 20 Drivers of Change 22 Section Introduction and Summary 22 Changes In Product Design 23 New Markets Bring New Opportunities and Threats 30 Further Out on the Horizon 34 The Next Twelve Months 36 Will There Be More Elective Migration? 36 Will There Be Different Winners and Losers? 37 Will the Growth in Other Markets Change Platform Sustainability? 38 Appendix: Data-Gathering Methodology 39 © 2016, MindWIres LLC. Unauthorized reproduction or sharing is strictly prohibited. LMS MARKET DYNAMICS | 3 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is designed help you understand the ongoing changes in adoption patterns for higher education Learning Management Systems (LMSs, also known as “Course Management Systems” or “Virtual Learning Environments”). It analyzes who is moving to or away from which platforms and how quickly they are moving.
    [Show full text]