Summary Report - June 12Th (Completion Rate: 100.0%)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Summary Report - June 12th (Completion rate: 100.0%) 1. The NVSD has 11 properties that are not required for public school use over the long term. Please identify the properties that interest you most: Response Chart Percentage Count Blueridge Elementary 48% 27 Cloverley School 14% 8 Fromme Elementary School 5% 3 Keith Lynn School 0% 0 Lonsdale Creek Annex 25% 14 Lucas Centre/Leo Marshall Curriculum 0% 0 Centre Maplewood School 0% 0 Monteray School 0% 0 Plymouth School 2% 1 Ridgeway Annex 2% 1 Westover School 4% 2 Total Responses 56 2. Please share any concerns that you might have regarding the future use of these properties. The 275 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. Category Chart Percentages Count Lucas - Test Category 0% 1 3. What options, ideas and/or opportunities do you have regarding the future use of these properties? The 293 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 4. Do you have any recommendations for how we might engage stakeholders in the NVSD land management initiatives? The 242 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 5. On a scale of 1 to 5, please rate your overall understanding of the Board's land management endeavours. Response Chart Percentage Count 1 15% 48 2 23% 74 3 37% 120 4 18% 60 5 7% 23 Total Responses 325 6. What information would be helpful for you to better understand the Board's land management processes and planning? The 213 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 7. Do you have any questions about the NVSD's land management initiatives? The 106 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 8. Is there anything else that you would like to share with the Board of Education? The 128 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 9. Did you attend the April 25th Open House? Response Chart Percentage Count Yes 33% 17 No 67% 34 Total Responses 51 10a. Do you have a child or children in school? Response Chart Percentage Count Yes 2% 5 No 98% 270 Total Responses 275 10b. If so, which schools? The 265 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 10c. Which grade(s) are they in? The 257 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 11. I am a resident of: Response Chart Percentage Count City of North Vancouver 25% 83 District of North Vancouver 70% 234 Other, please specify... 6% 19 Total Responses 336 11. I am a resident of: (Other, please specify...) # Response 1. doesn't matter 2. West Vancouver 3. vancouver 4. Vancouver 5. West Vancouver 6. Vancouver 7. Burnaby 8. Vancouver 9. burnaby 10. West End 11. West Vancouver 12. city of West Vancouver 13. Dist of West Vancouver 14. Port Coquitlam 15. Lower Mainland 16. West Vancouver 17. West Vancouver 18. West Van 19. BURNABY 12. What neighborhood do you live in? The 322 response(s) to this question can be found in the appendix. 13. I am a: Response Chart Percentage Count student 2% 6 parent 71% 240 community member 9% 32 employee of the School District 13% 43 Other, please specify... 5% 18 Total Responses 339 13. I am a: (Other, please specify...) # Response 1. both resident and business owner who pays taxes to SD44 in both ways 2. a concerned citizen 3. parent, community member and employee 4. Parent, c community member and employee 5. parent, community member, education professional, past SD44 employee 6. prefer not to say 7. employee and parent 8. Full time working prof mother. 9. Parent, employee of school district too 10. ece 11. Parent, Community Member, Fulltime Employed, Student 12. more than one bullet applies 13. Grandparent of 3 ages 7,5 and 2 14. track official, parent of former track athlete 15. Coach at NorWesters Track and Field Club 16. my child belongs to Norwesters track and field club 17. coach [ Norwester track field club] 14. Would you like to receive email updates about the land management process? Response Percentage Count Yes 10% 33 No 38% 122 If yes, please provide your first and last name (optional) and your 52% 170 email address (required) Total Responses 325 Appendix 2. Please share any concerns that you might have regarding the future use of these properties. | # Response 1. Lucas Center: This large flat piece of land should be maintained as the proposed denser population along the Marine Drive corridor will be needed for schools in the future. The same issues of OCP to increase the density along Lonsdale and the Marine corridor should be considered as reasons not to sell Cloverley and Maplewood schools Monteray School: This small school will not be of use as a school in the future, but the lands could be used to house senior's daycare, daycare, or other none profit community resources 2. I don't necessarily have concerns regarding the future use of these properties other then to say that they certainly should not be standing empty and costing the school district money. If they cannot be rented out within a reasonable time, the properties should be sold and monies should be used for schools that remain open so that PACs are not having to do so much fundraising. 3. Future need 4. Lucas/Marshall: they've performed their purpose well and continue to be useful - they really DON'T need their services performed in a prime place like Central Lonsdale Fromme: during the last 5 years NV District has spent about 60% of their traffic calming budget in this area - and now for the benefit of a private institution??? Does SD44 and DNV actually talk to one another? One would think not given the Fromme experience. (This is the school on your list closest to me geographically) Maplewood: friends living close to there plus I think the Lions Gate Christian Academy affair was badly bungled by the previous board Blueridge: though living in Blueridge I went to Seymour Heights since Blueridge wasn't built yet. The walks were long particularly in winter weather. Hopefully things are better for the kids now but to me Blueridge looks to be in far better shape than Seymour Heights and should be the one retained 5. Monteray: I would like to see a plan for my area (Balmoral community) that supports the students that are here today / tomorrow and reflects our community needs (Balmoral and Monteray closed recently, North Star and Delbrook also closed). This work should be completed before a decision is made on Monteray. I would like to know the ownership history of this property and the other properties in our community. Lucas: I believe the Hamilton area deserves the same level of focus from NVSD as these two areas seem to be where NVSD is less competitive. Keith Lynn: listed this as well as I feel there's a connection between any land proceeds here and a future location for the CLP program (which if our Balmoral community re-emerges as a secondary school may be required). 6. As the school is small and not in good condition, it most likely can't be rented out, so I am concerned with what may be developed on the site. 7. I live on west 21st, across from the existing Lucas Centre. If this facility is to shut down, my main concern is that the zoning may be changed to support high density housing or affordable housing. 8. Lucas Centre: Retain for future use - for now, grass sports field is valuable and the remainder of the property is flat and would be vauable for sport use. All properties: Although the land may not be deemed necessary at this time, the community will be here forever. Making irrevocable decisions based on 10 - 30 years of history is potentially disastrous. The core of the City and the District will undergo great change in the next 50 years. Let's hold on to the land in these areas for the future. 9. There is a desparate need for more AT fields in the district. Too many sports can't play due to the rain. This is the only property left that could support 4 - 5 AT fields and a club house to creat a much needed soccer venue in North Van. 10. Lucas Centre represents the most valuable property of the group because of its size and location. As the population in the south-west portion of the city increases, there will eventually be a need for a middle or junior secondary to reduce the load on Carson Graham. I realize that the NVSD has been following a path that is contrary to the concept of both community schools and a middle or junior secondary school format, but the alternative of a monolithic central high school is not an acceptable alternative to most residents on the North Shore. 11. Lucas Centre. My concern is 2 fold. One, as a resident in the area traffic congestion getting in and out of the area is a concern. Two, the loss of 2 gravel fields and 1 grass field from the playing field inventory in North Vancouver would have a significant impact. 12. For all the properties above, I believe that redeveloping them into affordable housing for families and seniors in important for future growth of the city. Suchh development should be sustainable for traffic and utility/ energy uses. 13. The density in the City of North Vancouver is growing. We have a lot of new families here and they can not afford to go to private schools.