DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Past Mayors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Past Mayors Mayors 1605 Michael Ireland 1606 Edmund Gravenor 1607 Clement Manesty 1608 John Finch 1609 Edward Carde 1610 John Sherley 1611 Michael Ireland 1612 John Vincent 1613 Robert Dawson 1614 John Finch 1615 Robert Goodman 1616 John Roberts 1617 Edmund Gravenor 1618 Edward Carde 1619 Edward Carde 1620 David Bromhal 1621 Thomas Thorogood 1622 Robert Dawson 1623 Christopher Browne 1624 Edward Lawrence 1625 Thomas Wright 1626 John Finch 1627 John Roberts 1628 Robert Dawson 1629 Edward Lawrence 1630 John Roberts 1631 John Dyer 1632 Christopher Browne 1633 George Hoppy 1634 Robert Dawson 1635 Gabriel Barbor 1636 Joseph Dalton 1637 Edward Lawrence 1638 John Dyer 1639 John Roberts 1640 George Hoppy 1641 Andrew Palmer 1642 Joseph Dalton 1643 Joseph Dalton 1644 Joseph Dalton 1645 Edward Lawrence 1646 William Turnour 1647 Isaac Puller 1648 William Gardiner 1649 John Clarke 1650 George Pettyt 1651 Joseph Bunker 1652 George Hoppy 1653 William Turnour 1654 John Roberts 1655 Joseph Dalton 1656 William Gardiner Edward Lawrence at death of William Gardiner 1657 Edward Lawrence 1658 William Turnour 1659 John Clarke 1660 Joseph Browne 1661 George Pettyt 1662 William Minors 1663 John Prichard 1664 George Seeley 1665 William Edmunds 1666 Edward Lawrence 1667 Benjamin Jones 1668 Samuel Goodman 1669 Thomas Pratt 1670 John Clarke 1671 John Prichard 1672 Edmund Bache 1673 William Edmunds 1674 Edward Lawrence 1675 John Dimsdale 1676 John Trott 1677 Benjamin Jones 1678 Israel Keynton 1679 William Stanes Edward Lawrence on death of William Stanes 1680 Edward Lawrence Christopher Ware on death of Edward Lawrence 1681 Thomas Archer 1682 John Dimsdale 1683 Benjamin Jones 1684 John Trott 1685 Israel Keynton 1686 William Hurrold 1687 Henry Squire 1688 John Dimsdale 1689 John Bache 1690 Benjamin Jones 1691 John Trott 1692 Joseph Calton 1693 Israel Keynton 1694 Thomas Archer 1695 William Hurrold 1696 Henry Squire 1697 John Dimsdale 1698 John Dimsdale 1699 John Dimsdale 1700 John Dimsdale 1701 Benjamin Jones 1702 John Trott 1703 Joseph Calton 1704 Samuel Hopkins 1705 Joseph Duke 1706 John Dimsdale jun 1707 Samuel Kent 1708 Israel Keynton 1709 William Hurrold 1710 Joseph Calton 1711 John Dimsdale jun 1712 Robert de Vale 1713 Edmund Blachnoe 1714 Joseph Calton 1715 Thomas Colson 1716 Edward Squire 1717 Thomas Blachnoe 1718 Richard Pearson 1719 Richard Bridgeman 1720 Phillip Neale 1721 Joseph Calton 1722 Thomas Colson 1723 Edward Squire 1724 Thomas Blachnoe 1725 Richard Pearson 1726 Charles Bridgeman 1727 John Bush 1728 Paul Howell 1729 William Eldridge 1730 George Butteris 1731 John Hall 1732 Thomas Clarke 1733 Charles Bridgeman 1734 Bostock Toller 1735 Harrison Green 1736 Jeremiah Hammond 1737 John Wright 1738 William Eldridge 1739 George Butteris 1740 John Hall 1741 Bostock Toller 1742 Jeremiah Hammond 1743 John Runnington 1744 Zaccheus Hayden 1745 John Smart 1746 John Wright 1747 Harrison Green 1748 William Eldridge 1749 George Butteris 1750 John Hall 1751 Bostock Toller 1752 Jeremiah Hammond 1753 John Wright 1754 John Runnington 1755 Jacob Burnapp John Camp on death of Jacob Burnapp 1756 John Kirby 1757 Benjamin Cherry 1758 John Camp 1759 Thomas Coulson 1760 George Butteris John Wright on death of George Butteris 1761 John Runnington 1762 Richard Cutler 1763 John Bebb 1764 Thomas Toller 1765 Samuel Atkinson 1766 John Camp 1767 John Kirby 1768 Benjamin Cherry 1769 Thomas Coulson 1770 Richard Cutler 1771 John Bebb 1772 Samuel Atkinson 1773 John Greenell 1774 Henry Dunster 1775 John Frost 1776 Benjamin Cherry 1777 Richard Cutler 1778 Samuel Atkinson 1779 John Greenell 1780 Edward Ellis 1781 Benjamin Cherry 1782 Richard Cutler 1783 Samuel Atkinson 1784 Edward Ellis 1785 Lord Fairford 1786 Henry Bradley 1787 Richard Cutler 1788 Samuel Atkinson 1789 Edward Ellis 1790 Baron Nathan Dimsdale 1791 Earl of Hillsborough 1792 John Carr LL.D. 1793 Richard Byron 1794 John Evans 1795 Henry Bradley 1796 Thomas Wright Archer 1797 Benjamin Rooke 1798 Benjamin Gillman 1799 John Best John Carr on death of John Best 1800 John Carr 1801 Thomas Simson 1802 Thomas Spence 1803 William Kimpton 1804 Baron Nathan Dimsdale 1805 John Frost 1806 John Evans 1807 Henry Bradley 1808 Thomas Colbeck 1809 Edward Ellis 1810 Thomas Wright Archer 1811 Mathias Gilbertson 1812 William Endersby Squire 1813 Henry Alington 1814 Thomas Simson 1815 Thomas Spence 1816 Thomas Colbeck 1817 Edward Ellis 1818 Thomas Archer 1819 Mathias Gilbertson 1820 William Endersby Squire 1821 Henry Alington 1822 John Ord MD 1823 Thomas Colbeck 1824 John Moses Carter 1825 Thomas Spence 1826 John Moses Carter 1827 Edward Ellis 1828 Edward Norwood 1829 Thomas Gripper 1830 John Ayres 1831 John Pemberton 1832 James M Gilbertson 1833 John Davies MD 1834 John Davies MD 1835 John Moses Carter 1836 Joseph Gripper 1837 John Folliott Powell 1838 John Moses Carter 1839 Edward Norwood 1840 Joseph Lawrence 1841 John Davies MD 1842 Henry Alington 1843 James Gilbertson 1844 John Ayres 1845 Joseph Lawrence 1846 John Moses Carter 1847 John Davies MD 1848 John Jasper Gripper 1849 Young Crawley 1850 James Hancock 1851 Franklin Hagger 1852 John Gardener 1853 Henry Inskip 1854 Jasper Gripper 1855 Benjamin Young 1856 Edward D Rayment 1857 John Woodhouse 1858 Henry Squire 1859 Henry Gilbertson 1860 John Jasper Gripper 1861 John Jasper Gripper 1862 Edward Manser 1863 Henry Rayment 1864 Jasper Gripper 1865 William M Armstrong 1866 William M Armstrong 1867 Robert Cocks 1868 Thomas Smith 1869 Samuel Neale 1870 William Plumer Willson 1871 Charles Adams 1872 Charles Adams 1873 William Baker 1874 Edward Augustus Simson 1875 William Plumer Willson 1876 Charles William Nunn 1877 William Warrender MD 1878 John Tasker Evans MD 1879 Robert Cocks 1880 William Baker 1881 William Baker 1882 William Warrender MD 1883 William Plumer Willson 1884 Robert Cocks 1885 Charles William Nunn 1886 Robert Cocks 1887 Alexander Peter McMullen 1888 Alexander Peter McMullen 1889 Isaac Robertson 1890 John Cooper 1891 Richard Ginn 1892 John Robert Cocks 1893 Alfred Baker 1894 Alfred George Page 1895 James Cort Haddon 1896 Alexander Peter McMullen 1897 Hellier Robert Hadsley Gosselin 1898 Hellier Robert Hadsley Gosselin 1899 William Frampton Andrews 1900 Alexander Purkiss Ginn 1901 Thomas Clemens Usher 1902 Charles Kenneth Murchison 1903 William Frampton Andrews 1904 George Edward Palmer 1905 Alfred Baker 1906 William Graveson 1907 Herbert Baker 1908 Morton James Baring Tomlin 1909 Robert Odell 1910 Alexander Purkiss Ginn 1911 James Burnett Smith 1912 Frank Page 1913 William Frampton Andrews 1914 Alexander Purkiss Ginn 1915 William John Mark Lacey 1916 Hellier Robert Hadsley Gosselin 1917 Hellier Robert Hadsley Gosselin 1918 Hellier Robert Hadsley Gosselin 1919 Thomas Barber OBE 1920 James Burnett Smith 1921 Sir Ernest Edward Pearson 1922 Sir Ernest Edward Pearson 1923 William Henry Brewster 1924 Josiah Wren 1925 Alexander Purkiss Ginn 1926 Albert Reginald Willson 1927 Frederic George Brient 1928 Sir Lionel Lawson Faudel Faudel-Phillips, Bart 1929 Sir Lionel Lawson Faudel Faudel-Phillips, Bart 1930 Stuart Purkiss Purkiss-Ginn 1931 Ashley Tucker Webb 1932 William Victor Procter 1933 Frederick William Heale 1934 James Frederick Keeble 1935 James Frederick Keeble 1936 Ashley Tucker Webb 1937 Ashley Tucker Webb 1938 George Charles Mansfield 1939 Ashley Tucker Webb George Charles Mansfield 1940 Douglas Jesse Rumbold 1941 Douglas Jesse Rumbold 1942 Douglas Jesse Rumbold 1943 Cyril William Gregory Vance Packenam 1944 Alan Donald Macfarlane 1945 Percy George Brooks 1946 James Frederick Keeble 1947 /1948 David Dye 1949 David Dye 1950 Francis Leslie Palmore 1951 Leonard Bruce Keeble 1952 Douglas Octavius Hale 1953 xxx Georges Brooks 1954 William Victor Procter 1955 Horace Ernest Gilby 1956 Winifred Brooks 1957 William Eric Dancy 1958 William Leslie Foster 1959 Cyril William Gregory Vance Packenam 1960 Frank Herniman 1961 John Jardener Forrester 1962 John Jardener Forrester 1963 George 1964 Anthony Wilson Bentley 1965 Francis Leslie Palmore 1966 William Leslie Foster 1967 N Ernest Selby 1968 Donald Malcolm xx 1969 George xxx 1970 Desmond Francis O'Connor 1971 Irene Olive Sandford 1972 John Roy Newman 1973 Anthony Wilson Bentley 1974 Joan Mary Coleman 1975 Joan Mary Coleman 1976 Robert John Checkley 1977 Robert John Checkley 1978 Charles Lesbett Larking 1979 Charles Lesbett Larking 1980 Sidney Wheston Andrews 1981 Pauline Jill Geall 1982 Roger Allen Martin 1983 Peter Alan Ruffles 1984 William Richard Hunter 1985 Andrew Martin Charles Weale 1986 Glenn Henry Sexton 1987 Rosemary Fleming Swallow 1988 Judith Ann Sparks 1989 William Richard Hunter 1990 Evelyn Viola Jacqueline Gudgin 1991 David Edmund Slaughter 1992 Henry Arthur Sargent 1993 Robert George Hodgson 1994 Rosemary Fleming Swallow 1995 Henry Arthur Sargent 1996 Colin Harris 1997 Jack Coote 1998 Jane E Page 1999 Colin Harris 2000 Richard Ovenden 2001 Diane Desmulie 2002 Alan White 2003 John Francis Cook 2004 Peter Alan Ruffles 2005 Nicholas Wilson 2006 Sally Newton 2007 Russell Radford 2008 Kim Philipa Darby 2009 David Ronald Poole 2010 Brenda Slyvia Haddock 2011 Sally Newton 2012 Jane Sartin 2013 Patricia Moore 2014 Chantal Geall 2015 Dr Linda Radford 2016 Dr Linda Radford 2017 Susan Dunkley 2018 Beryl Wrangles 2019 Rosemary Bolton .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geoffrey De Mandeville a Study of the Anarchy
    GEOFFREY DE MANDEVILLE A STUDY OF THE ANARCHY By John Horace Round CHAPTER I. THE ACCESSION OF STEPHEN. BEFORE approaching that struggle between King Stephen and his rival, the Empress Maud, with which this work is mainly concerned, it is desirable to examine the peculiar conditions of Stephen's accession to the crown, determining, as they did, his position as king, and supplying, we shall find, the master-key to the anomalous character of his reign. The actual facts of the case are happily beyond question. From the moment of his uncle's death, as Dr. Stubbs truly observes, "the succession was treated as an open question." * Stephen, quick to see his chance, made a bold stroke for the crown. The wind was in his favour, and, with a handful of comrades, he landed on the shores of Kent. 2 His first reception was not encouraging : Dover refused him admission, and Canterbury closed her gates. 8 On this Dr. Stubbs thus comments : " At Dover and at Canterbury he was received with sullen silence. The men of Kent had no love for the stranger who came, as his predecessor Eustace had done, to trouble the land." * But "the men of Kent" were faithful to Stephen, when all others forsook him, and, remembering this, one would hardly expect to find in them his chief opponents. Nor, indeed, were they. Our great historian, when he wrote thus, must, I venture to think, have overlooked the passage in Ordericus (v. 110), from which we learn, incidentally, that Canterbury and Dover were among those fortresses which the Earl of Gloucester held by his father's gift.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Monument Fifty Years Since Panofsky’S Tomb Sculpture
    REVISITING THE MONUMENT FIFTY YEARS SINCE PANOFSKY’S TOMB SCULPTURE EDITED BY ANN ADAMS JESSICA BARKER Revisiting The Monument: Fifty Years since Panofsky’s Tomb Sculpture Edited by Ann Adams and Jessica Barker With contributions by: Ann Adams Jessica Barker James Alexander Cameron Martha Dunkelman Shirin Fozi Sanne Frequin Robert Marcoux Susie Nash Geoffrey Nuttall Luca Palozzi Matthew Reeves Kim Woods Series Editor: Alixe Bovey Courtauld Books Online is published by the Research Forum of The Courtauld Institute of Art Somerset House, Strand, London WC2R 0RN © 2016, The Courtauld Institute of Art, London. ISBN: 978-1-907485-06-0 Courtauld Books Online Advisory Board: Paul Binski (University of Cambridge) Thomas Crow (Institute of Fine Arts) Michael Ann Holly (Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute) Courtauld Books Online is a series of scholarly books published by The Courtauld Institute of Art. The series includes research publications that emerge from Courtauld Research Forum events and Courtauld projects involving an array of outstanding scholars from art history and conservation across the world. It is an open-access series, freely available to readers to read online and to download without charge. The series has been developed in the context of research priorities of The Courtauld which emphasise the extension of knowledge in the fields of art history and conservation, and the development of new patterns of explanation. For more information contact [email protected] All chapters of this book are available for download at courtauld.ac.uk/research/courtauld-books-online Every effort has been made to contact the copyright holders of images reproduced in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawing After the Antique at the British Museum
    Drawing after the Antique at the British Museum Supplementary Materials: Biographies of Students Admitted to Draw in the Townley Gallery, British Museum, with Facsimiles of the Gallery Register Pages (1809 – 1817) Essay by Martin Myrone Contents Facsimile, Transcription and Biographies • Page 1 • Page 2 • Page 3 • Page 4 • Page 5 • Page 6 • Page 7 Sources and Abbreviations • Manuscript Sources • Abbreviations for Online Resources • Further Online Resources • Abbreviations for Printed Sources • Further Printed Sources 1 of 120 Jan. 14 Mr Ralph Irvine, no.8 Gt. Howland St. [recommended by] Mr Planta/ 6 months This is probably intended for the Scottish landscape painter Hugh Irvine (1782– 1829), who exhibited from 8 Howland Street in 1809. “This young gentleman, at an early period of life, manifested a strong inclination for the study of art, and for several years his application has been unremitting. For some time he was a pupil of Mr Reinagle of London, whose merit as an artist is well known; and he has long been a close student in landscape afer Nature” (Thom, History of Aberdeen, 1: 198). He was the third son of Alexander Irvine, 18th laird of Drum, Aberdeenshire (1754–1844), and his wife Jean (Forbes; d.1786). His uncle was the artist and art dealer James Irvine (1757–1831). Alexander Irvine had four sons and a daughter; Alexander (b.1777), Charles (b.1780), Hugh, Francis, and daughter Christian. There is no record of a Ralph Irvine among the Irvines of Drum (Wimberley, Short Account), nor was there a Royal Academy student or exhibiting or listed artist of this name, so this was surely a clerical error or misunderstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scropfs of Bolton and of Masham
    THE SCROPFS OF BOLTON AND OF MASHAM, C. 1300 - C. 1450: A STUDY OF A kORTHERN NOBLE FAMILY WITH A CALENDAR OF THE SCROPE OF BOLTON CARTULARY 'IWO VOLUMES VOLUME II BRIGh h VALE D. PHIL. THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY MAY 1987 VOLUME 'IWO GUIDE '10 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CALENDAR OF THE SCROPE OF BOLTON CARTULARY 1 GUIDE '10 Call'ENTS page 1. West Bolton 1 2. Little Bolton or Low Bolton 7, 263 3. East Bolton or Castle Bolton 11, 264 4. Preston Under Scar 16, 266 5. Redmire 20, 265, 271 6. Wensley 24, 272 7. Leyburn 38, 273 8. Harmby 43, 274, 276 9. Bellerby 48, 275, 277 10. Stainton 57, 157 11. Downholme 58, 160 12. Marske 68, 159 13. Richmond 70, 120, 161 14. Newton Morrell 79, 173 15. rolby 80, 175 16. Croft on Tees 81, 174 17. Walmire 85 18. Uckerby 86, 176 19. Bolton on Swale 89, 177 20. Ellerton on Swale 92, 178, 228, 230 21. Thrintoft 102, 229 22. Yafforth 103, 231 23. Ainderby Steeple 106, 232 24. Caldwell 108, 140, 169 25. Stanwick St. John 111, 167 26. Cliff on Tees 112 27. Eppleby 113, 170 28. Aldbrough 114, 165 29. Manfield 115, 166 30. Brettanby and Barton 116, 172 31. Advowson of St. Agatha's, Easby 122, 162 32. Skeeby 127, 155, 164 33. Brampton on Swale 129, 154 34. Brignall 131, 187 35. Mbrtham 137, 186 36. Wycliffe 139, 168 37. Sutton Howgrave 146, 245 38. Thornton Steward 150, 207 39. Newbiggin 179, 227 40.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections for a History of Staffordshire, 1883
    COLLECTIONS StaffordshireFOE A HISTORY 0F , 0 STAFFORDSHIRE % I SampleEDITEDCounty BY Studies VOL. IV. 1883. LONDON: HARRISON AND SONS. ST. MARTIN’S LA NR. Staffordshire GENERAL MEETING,. 1 5 th OCTOBER, 1883. At the General Meeting of the above Society held at the William Salt Library, Stafford, on the 15th October, 1883, the Lord Lieutenant of the County in the chair, the following report of the Editorial Committee was read to the Meeting by the Honorary Secretary, and wasSample ordered to be printed, together with the Balance Sheet for 1882, in the AppendixCounty to the next volume. The Editorial Committee have to report that the third volume of Collections for a History of Staffordshire was issued to the subscribers in the early part of this year. The printing of Volume IV . is about half completed, and it is expected the volume will be in the hands of the subscribers early in the ensuing year. Its contents consist of tlio Plea Hells temp. Henry III., the Pinal Concords for the Studiessame reign, the "Warwickshire Pinal Concords affecting Staffordshire tenants from the earliest period up to the end of the reign of Henry 1I I .; and an abstract of the contents of the Ranfcon Chartu- lary. These comprise Part I. of the volume, which has been edited by the Honorary Secretary. Part II. of the volume will contain the History of Church Eaton and its members, by the Hon. and Rev. Canon Bridgeman. In pursuance of a resolution passed at the last General Meeting, the President of the Society wrote to the Marquis of Anglesey, forwarding a copy of the resolution in question, and requesting his Lordship’s favourable consideration of tbo proposal contained in it, to the effect that the Burton Chari ulary might he lodged for a stated period in the William Salt Library , for the purpose of making an abstract IV of its contents, to be printed subsequently by the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Proc. BSBI 1, 418-460
    J!ER~UNALIA AND NOTICES TO MEMBEW; 417 'l'RE SOOIETY FOB VISI1'ING SOIENTISTS 'rhe Society for Visiting Scientists, Ltd., 5 Old Burlington Street, London, W.1, established in the spring of 1944 when Britain had the honour Qof welcQoming many scientists from Allied countries, seeks to be a focus for all scientists visiting the United Kingdom, and to put them in touch with British scientists and with one another. The Society aims to provide and encourage an active exchange of scientific thought and discussion between scientists of the United Kingdom and scientists from overseas. The House of the Society pro,vides a meeting place, a refectory, a ba.r and some residential acco=odation. In addition an information service is provided which is o'pen to. all visiting scientists, so that any scientist arriving in this country can, if he wishes, proceed at once to the House and be given such advice and information as is available. Among the Society's activities is the holding of receptions in honour of groups 00£ scientists visiting Britain, who thus have an o,pportunity of meeting at the House their British and oversea colleagues. Informal discussion meetings of general interest to scientists are Q.rganised. The Society provides a forum for topics which are outside the sOQope of specialised scientific societies but which are of importance to scientists as a whole. The Society's Officers are Professor A. V. Hill, C.H., O.B.E., F.R.S. (President and Chairman); Professor F. J. M. Stratton, D.8.0., O.B.E., F .R.S., and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Record Office, London Lists and Indexes, Ijo. Ieiiiii. Iiiiieik of In
    PU BLIC RECORD OFFICE, LON DON AN D I N D E X E L I S T S S , IJO . IEII I I I . I II I i E IK OF IN U I S I T I ON S PRES ERVED IN T HE P U BL IC RECORD OF F ICE . VT HA L E RY V III . T O P H I L IP M ARY H N . BY ARRAN GEM EN T W IT H H ER M AJES T Y’S S T AT ON ER Y I OF F ICE, L ON D ON ’ JEEW IQMRK } K R AU S R E P R I N T C O R P O R AT I O N 1 9 6 3 Calligraphic Amendments incorp orated from the master copy l n the S earch Room of the P ublic Record Office T h is s e ries was fi rs t pub lis he d o n b e h a lf o f t h e P u blic ’ R e c o rd O ffi c e b y H e r B rit a nn ic M a j es t y s S t a tio ne ry O ffic e a s fo ll o ws : Vo l s 1—3 8 b etwee n 18 92 a n d 19 12 ; — V o l 39 : 19 13 ; Vo ls 40 43 : 19 14 ; V o l 44 : 19 15 ; V o l 45 : 19 17 ; Vo ls 46— 48 : 1922 ; V o l 49 : 1923 ; V o l 50 : 192 7 ; Vo ls 5 1—52 : 1929 ; V o l 53 : 193 1 ; V o l 54 : 1933 ; V o l 55 1 6 R e int e b e rm is s io n a n d wit th e a th o rit 93 .
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Hughes I De Cavalcamp Seigneur De Conches
    Descendants of Hughes I de Cavalcamp Seigneur de Conches Generation 1 1 1. HUGHES IDE CAVALCAMP SEIGNEUR DE CONCHES was born about 890 AD. He died about 980 AD in pr. Conches, Eure, Evreux, Normandy, France. Notes for Hughes I de Cavalcamp Seigneur de Conches: The best source for descendants of "Hughes de Cavalcamp" in Normandy and England, with detailed charts and copious notes is, "Famille & seigneurs de Tosny" by Etienne Pattou (2012) found at: http://racineshistoire.free.fr/LGN/PDF/Tosny.pdf In speaking of Hugh of Calvacamp, Guillaume of Jumièges names [his great-grandson] “Rogerius Toenites de stirpe Malahulcii qui Rollonis ducis patruus fuera. Oderic Vitalis, writing in 1113, says the same thing (see entry for Malahule), and appears correct in that Rollo is the son of Ragnavald Eysteinsson the reported brother of Malahulc Eysteinsson. If this source is correct, then Hugh de Calvacamp would be the first cousin of Rollo. Wiki provides a perspective which downplays Orderic Vitalis: "The house Tosny (in England also Töny, Tonei, Toni and Tony) was a family of the Norman nobility, without actually coming from Normandy. They played on 10 to 12 Century the duchy a prominent role, without ever being honored with a Count or Viscount title. The Normandy in the second half of the 11th Century with the most important strongholds of Tosny The Tosny come with security from the Ile-de-France, although the top 12 of Orderic Vitalis Century reported that the family came from Malahulce. Progenitor is Hugo de Calvacamp. 942 his son Hugo, a monk at the Abbey of Saint-Denis, to the Archbishop of Reims was appointed, probably in his wake, the family had then settled in Normandy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scudamore Stirrups, and the Family's Use of Personal
    Occasional Papers, no. 38 THE SCUDAMORE STIRRUPS, AND THE FAMILY’S USE OF PERSONAL SEALS DURING THE LATE MIDDLE AGES by Warren Skidmore The art of heraldry had its origin in France. By the middle of the 12th century most of the landed families in both France and England had chosen an emblem or device perhaps first used on their shields at the tournaments organized to mimic a battle for aspiring knights.1 Soon after wax seals, particularly those used by the Crown, became a component part of legal documents that guaranteed their authenticity. Personal seals followed engraved with arbitrary devices that were seldom so distinctive as to identify the owner of the seal. Later this was done by adding a surrounding legend with either the name (or title) of the person to whom it belonged. The shape of seals used by lay persons during this period was generally circular, while the seals of ecclesiastics (or their institutions) were generally oblong and pointed. The first known use of the Scudamore stirrups on a seal was found on an original charter at the Huntington Library in San Marino, California. It belonged to Petri de Escudemor and was used on a charter dated 24 August 1323. My drawing done from a photograph has been widely reproduced.2 Decorative uses of the family stirrups can still be seen at a great many ancestral sites pertaining to the Scudamores from the church at Wellow, Somerset (and notably at several places in Herefordshire) which were visited by an American family group in August 2008. This group of Skidmore cousins traveled under the tutelage of Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sorted by County, Then Plaintiff
    CP40/ 1076 Hilary 1533 For text see http://aalt.law.uh.edu by Vance Mead Image Side County Plea Plaintiffs Defendants Archer, Richard; Margaret his wife; Man, William; Agnes his 3929 f Beds concord wife Odell, Robert Aucton, Thomas, executors of; (Malden, William; Gylmyn, 5094 f Beds debt Thomas) Aucton, Elizabeth, of Hotton, widow Becham, William, of Eton, 6402 d Beds Barleman, John husbandman Belfeld, Joan, administrator Webbe, Richard, of Stone, Bucks, 5087 f Beds debt of; (Belfeld, William) yeoman Baskervile, Richard, of Lempster, 4482 f Beds debt execution Bently, Thomas Herefs, gent Ferrer, Alexander, of Carleton, husbandman; Olney, Henry, of Southhill, laborer; Carpenter, Bleverhassett, John, Simon, Southhill, carpenter; Smyth, executors of; (Grey, Henry, William, of Southhill, husbandman; knight; Seynt Jermyn, Ploghwryte, Richard, of Southhill, 6402 d Beds Christopher) ploughwright Crowche, John, of Hexston, Herts, Bleverhayset, John, executors husbandman; Coffeley, Henry, of of; (Grey, Henry, knight; Seynt Hexston, husbandman; Dey, 5087 f Beds debt Jermyn, Christopher) Richard, of Hexston, husbandman Greve, Henry, of Carleton, yeoman; Anne his wife; Greve or Grene, trespass and Richard, of Carleton, husbandman; 4632 f Beds contempt Bonham, thomas; Burell, John Eleanor his wife Bray, William, executor of; Whytehed, Henry, of Bekeleswade, 6403 d Beds (Cokke, George) yeoman Bray, William; Colmorth, Wolmar, Robert, of Beleswade, 6403 d Beds William; Cokke, George husbandman Broke, George, of Cobham, knight; Bray, Edward, knight; Spencer,
    [Show full text]
  • Protections 395
    PART II: PROTECTIONS 395 1295 1296 2092 December 13 2103 March 2 Contd. Robert de Brus, earl of Carrick [no. 1120], and Bello Campo, both with the king. [Both 24 June.] William de Rothyng, William de Brus, William de [ibid]. Badewe, Thomas de Reved, Nicholas de Barrington, Edmund de Badewe, Archibald le Bretun, Mr Andrew 2104 March 3 de Sancto Albano, Walter Crisp, all with him; John de Segrave with the king, and Richard de Theobald de Neyvill, Philip de Geyton, Easter. [C 67/11, m. 6]. Cornubia, Reginald de Hampden, Robert de Denemed and 1296 Richard le Venur de Laverton, all with John. 2093 January 10 [C 67/11, m. 6]. Walter de Agmondesham with the John de Monteforti, William Fauvel, Thomas de king; Robert de Mar. (C 67/11, m. 3]. Thomas de Shesnecote, Henry Dulee, John Dod, Richard de Lathum, Robert de Lathum [no. 1144], Adam de de Arcy, Whitacre. [All Easter.] [ibid]. Everyngeham, Philip de Arcy, Hugh John Brun, William de Berney, John Avenel, all with the 2094 January 17 bishop of Durham; Gregory de Broune, Hugh Wake Oliver la Zuche; 24 June. [ibid]. of Deping, both with John Wake; Giles de Brewose [no. 1124], Robert de Percy, William de Houk, 2095 January 18 Thomas de Stanlow, John Fayrfax, Roger de Roger le Bygod, earl of Norfolk and marshal of Goldstow, Godfrey de Melsa, all with the bishop England, John Lovel of Tychemersh. [Both 24 of Durham; John Pecche with William de Bello June.] [ibid]. Campo; Reginald de Cobeham with the earl of the 2096 January 19 Norfolk; John de Warenna, earl of Surrey, with Robert de Scales, Edward Charles.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Hundred Rolls Local Government and Corruption in The
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE KENT HUNDRED ROLLS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND CORRUPTION IN THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY JENNIFER WARD The Kent Hundred Rolls of 1274-5, preserved in the National Archives, provide a mine of information for local historians. Many were printed by the Record Commission in the early Mneteenth century, but the two bulky volumes are only to be found in major libraries and the rolls are printed in abbreviated Latin.1 The new edition by the Kent Archaeological Society [published on its website, www.kentarchaeology.ac] comprises the com- plete rolls for Kent, in the original Latin and in an English translation (by Dr Bridgett Jones), and makes the source much more widely accessible. The Kent Rolls are remarkably complete, although there are a few omissions. The major liberties are only mentioned incidentally, namely the lowy of Tonbridge and the hundred of Wachlingstone. in the hands of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester and Hertford; Wye, in the hands of the abbot of Battle abbey, Sussex; and the Cinque Ports which had their own privileges. In addition, there is no return for Sheppey or Ospringe. The Hundred Rolls have been discussed by a number of legal and administrative Mstorians, notably by Helen Cam, whose The Hundred and the Hundred Rolls, published in 1930, is still of value today.2 Edward I returned from crusade in 1274 to a kingdom where the Crown had been weakened by civil war during the baroMal reform period of 1258-65, and where there was extensive local government corruption.
    [Show full text]