David Reimer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

David Reimer David Reimer David Peter Reimer (born Bruce Peter Reimer; 22 August 1965 – 4 May 2004) was a Canadian man born male but reassigned as a girl and raised female following medical advice and David Reimer intervention after his penis was accidentally destroyed during a botched circumcision in infancy.[2] Born Bruce Peter The psychologist John Money oversaw the case and reported the reassignment as successful and as evidence that gender identity is primarily learned. The academic sexologist Milton Reimer Diamond later reported that Reimer's realization he was not a girl crystallized between the ages of 9 and 11 years[3] and he transitioned to living as a male at age 15. Well known in medical 22 August 1965 circles for years anonymously as the "John/Joan" case, Reimer later went public with his story to help discourage similar medical practices. He committed suicide after suffering years of Winnipeg, severe depression, financial instability, and a troubled marriage.[4] Manitoba, Canada Died 4 May 2004 Contents (aged 38) Winnipeg, Infancy Manitoba, Later childhood and adolescence Canada Adulthood Cause of Suicide Legacy death Documentaries Other names Brenda Reimer · In popular culture Bruce Reimer See also Spouse(s) Jane Fontane (m. 1990) References Footnotes Parent(s) Janet Reimer · [1] Bibliography Ron Reimer Further reading Relatives Brian Henry Reimer (identical twin) Infancy Reimer was born in Winnipeg, Manitoba, on 22 August 1965, the eldest of identical twin boys.[5] He was originally named Bruce and his identical twin was named Brian.[6] Their parents were Janet and Ron Reimer, a couple of Mennonite descent who had married the previous December.[6] At the age of six months, after concern was raised about how both of them urinated, the boys were diagnosed with phimosis.[7] They were referred for circumcision at the age of seven months. On 27 April 1966 a urologist performed the operation using the unconventional method of electrocauterization,[8][9] but the procedure did not go as doctors had planned, and Bruce's penis was burned beyond surgical repair.[10] The doctors chose not to operate on Brian, whose phimosis soon cleared without surgical intervention.[11] The parents, concerned about their son's prospects for future happiness and sexual function without a penis, took him to Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore in early 1967 to see John Money,[12] a psychologist who was developing a reputation as a pioneer in the field of sexual development and gender identity, based on his work with intersex patients.[13] Money was a prominent proponent of the "theory of gender neutrality"—that gender identity developed primarily as a result of social learning from early childhood and that it could be changed with the appropriate behavioural interventions.[14] The Reimers had seen Money being interviewed in February 1967 on the Canadian news program This Hour Has Seven Days, during which he discussed his theories about gender.[15] Money and physicians working with young children born with intersex conditions believed that a penis could not be replaced but that a functional vagina could be constructed surgically. It was also the safest and most conventional pathway to take: Money told the parents it was what would be best for the boy.[9] Money also claimed that Reimer would be more likely to achieve successful, functional sexual maturation as a girl than as a boy.[16] For Money, a case where identical twin boys were involved where one could be raised as a girl provided a perfect test of his theories.[17][18] Money and the Hopkins team persuaded the baby's parents that sex reassignment surgery would be in Reimer's best interest.[19] At the age of 22 months, baby Bruce underwent a bilateral orchidectomy, in which his testes were surgically removed and a rudimentary vulva was fashioned.[20] Bruce was reassigned to be raised as female and given the name Brenda.[21] Psychological support for the reassignment and surgery was provided by John Money, who continued to see Reimer annually for about a decade for consultations and to assess the outcome.[22] This reassignment was considered an especially valid test case[23] of the social learning concept of gender identity for two reasons: First, Reimer's identical twin brother, Brian, made an ideal control because the brothers shared genes, family environments, and the intrauterine environment. Second, this was reputed to be the first reassignment and reconstruction performed on a male infant who had no abnormality of prenatal or early postnatal sexual differentiation. Later childhood and adolescence Reimer said that Money forced the twins to rehearse sexual acts involving "thrusting movements", with David playing the bottom role. Reimer said that, as a child, he had to get "down on all fours" with his brother, Brian Reimer, "up behind his butt" with "his crotch against" his "buttocks". Reimer said that Money forced David, in another sexual position, to have his "legs spread" with Brian on top. Reimer said that Money also forced the children to take their "clothes off" and engage in "genital inspections". On at "least one occasion", Reimer said that Money took a photograph of the two children doing these activities. Money's rationale for these various treatments was his belief that "childhood 'sexual rehearsal play' " was important for a "healthy adult gender identity".[16] For several years, Money reported on Reimer's progress as the "John/Joan case", describing apparently successful female gender development and using this case to support the feasibility of sex reassignment and surgical reconstruction even in non-intersex cases. Money wrote, "The child's behavior is so clearly that of an active little girl and so different from the boyish ways of her twin brother."[24] Notes by a former student at Money's lab state that, during the follow- up visits, which occurred only once a year, Reimer's parents routinely lied to lab staff about the success of the procedure. The twin brother, Brian, later developed schizophrenia.[18] Reimer had experienced the visits to Baltimore as traumatic rather than therapeutic, and when Money started pressuring the family to bring him in for surgery during which a vagina would be constructed, the family discontinued the follow-up visits. From 22 months into his teenaged years, Reimer urinated through a hole that surgeons had placed in the abdomen. Estrogen was given during adolescence, inducing breast development.[25] Adulthood By the age of 13 years, Reimer was experiencing suicidal depression and he told his parents he would take his own life if they made him see Money again. Finally, on 14 March 1980, Reimer's parents told him the truth about his gender reassignment,[26] following advice from Reimer's endocrinologist and psychiatrist. At 14, having been informed of his past by his father, Reimer decided to assume a male gender identity, calling himself David. By 1987, Reimer had undergone treatment to reverse the reassignment, including testosterone injections, a double mastectomy, and two phalloplasty operations. On 22 September 1990 he married Jane Fontane and would adopt her three children.[27][28] His case came to international attention in 1997 when he told his story to Milton Diamond, an academic sexologist who persuaded Reimer to allow him to report the outcome in order to dissuade physicians from treating other infants similarly.[3] Soon after, Reimer went public with his story and John Colapinto published a widely disseminated and influential account in Rolling Stone magazine in December 1997.[29] The article won the National Magazine Award for Reporting.[30] This was later expanded into the New York Times best-selling biography As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl (2000),[31] in which Colapinto described how—contrary to Money's reports—when living as Brenda, Reimer did not identify as a girl. He was ostracized and bullied by peers (who dubbed him "cavewoman"),[9][32] and neither frilly dresses (which he was forced to wear during frigid Winnipeg winters),[33] nor female hormones made him feel female. In addition to his difficult lifelong relationship with his parents, Reimer had to deal with unemployment and the death of his brother Brian from an overdose of antidepressants on 1 July 2002. On 2 May 2004 his wife Jane told him she wanted to separate. On the morning of 4 May 2004, Reimer drove to a grocery store's parking lot in his hometown of Winnipeg[34] and took his own life by shooting himself in the head with a sawed-off shotgun.[35] He was 38 years old.[4] He was buried in St. Vital Cemetery in Winnipeg.[36] Legacy For the first thirty years after Money's initial report that the reassignment had been a success, Money's view of the malleability of gender became the dominant viewpoint among physicians and doctors, reassuring them that sexual reassignment was the correct decision in certain instances, resulting in thousands of sexual reassignments.[37] The report and subsequent book about Reimer influenced several medical practices, reputations, and even current understanding of the biology of gender. The case accelerated the decline of sex reassignment and surgery for unambiguous XY infants with micropenis, various other rare congenital malformations, or penile loss in infancy.[37] Reimer has often been mentioned by intactivists, who use him as an example of what could happen to a man if his parents decide to circumcise him at birth and the effect it can have on him throughout his life. Colapinto's book described unpleasant childhood therapy sessions, implying that Money had ignored or concealed the developing evidence that Reimer's reassignment to female was not going well. Money's defenders have suggested that some of the allegations about the therapy sessions may have been the result of false memory syndrome and that the family was not honest with researchers.[38] The case has also been treated by Judith Butler in her 2004 book Undoing Gender,[39] which examines gender, sex, psychoanalysis, and the medical treatment of intersex people.
Recommended publications
  • Identity: Foucault Against Butler on Herculine Barbin Au
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository <Articles>Bodies and Pleasures in the Happy Limbo of a Non- Title identity: Foucault against Butler on Herculine Barbin Author(s) Hakoda, Tetz Citation ZINBUN (2015), 45: 91-108 Issue Date 2015-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/197515 © Copyright March 2015, Institute for Research in Humanities Right Kyoto University. Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University ZINBUN No. 45 2014 Bodies and Pleasures in the Happy Limbo of a Non-identity: Foucault against Butler on Herculine Barbin Tetz HAKODA ABSTRACT: This paper aims to establish a theoretical dialogue between Judith Butler and Michel Foucault on the notions of body and pleasure through an analysis of their texts on the autobiography of Herculine Barbin. Butler claims that Foucault’s introductory essay to Herculine Barbin is somewhat inconsistent with his theoretical standpoint on sex and sexuality. While appreciating his construc- tionist approach, she doubts that Foucault ever succeeds in getting rid of a utopian vision of sexual- ity. However, her discussion seems to face another theoretical deadlock because of her insistence on law and desire. With much stress on the impossibility of love of Alexina, her own reading ends up with some fatalism under the law of prohibition. On the other hand, Foucault reads the memoirs as a record of encounter of an otherwise anonymous person with the emerging modern apparatus of power. Re-reading his essay in this line, we can find a way of thinking that is neither an idealistic identity-free body nor a fatalistic subject of desire.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Histories, Queer Futures: Imaging and Imagining 'Abnormal'
    eSharp Issue 16: Politics and Aesthetics Medical histories, queer futures: Imaging and imagining ‘abnormal’ corporealities Hilary Malatino Once upon a time, queer bodies weren’t pathologized. Once upon a time, queer genitals weren’t surgically corrected. Once upon a time, in lands both near and far off, queers weren’t sent to physicians and therapists for being queer – that is, neither for purposes of erotic reform, gender assignment, nor in order to gain access to hormonal supplements and surgical technologies. Importantly, when measures to pathologize queerness arose in the 19th century, they did not respect the now-sedimented lines that distinguish queernesses pertaining to sexual practice from those of gender identification, corporeal modification, or bodily abnormality. These distinguishing lines – which today constitute the intelligibility of mainstream LGBT political projects – simply did not pertain. The current typological separation of lesbian and gay concerns from those of trans, intersex, and genderqueer folks aids in maintaining the hegemony of homonormative political endeavors. For those of us interested in forging coalitions that are attentive to the concerns of minoritized queer subjects, rethinking the pre-history of these queer typologies is a necessity. This paper is an effort at this rethinking, one particularly focused on the conceptual centrality of intersexuality to the development of contemporary intelligibilities of queerness. It is necessary to give some sort of shape to this foregone moment. It exists prior to the sedimentation of modern Western medical discourse and practice. It is therefore also historically anterior 1 eSharp Issue 16: Politics and Aesthetics to the rise of a scientific doctrine of sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Review XXY Offers a New View of Life in an Intersex Body
    Film Review XXY Offers a New View of Life in an Intersex Body XXY (Film Movement 2008) Directed by Lucía Puenzo; written (in Spanish, with English subtitles) by Lucía Puenzo, based on a short story by Sergio Bizzio. Running time: 1 hour 31 minutes. Not rated. Reviewed by Anne Tamar-Mattis† I was ready to hate XXY,1 the much-lauded film by Argentinean filmmaker Lucía Puenzo. The film is a fictional account of the coming-of-age of Alex (Inés Efron), an intersex adolescent living in a remote coastal village in Uruguay. In general, I approach fictional and mainstream media representations of intersex people with some trepidation. Too often, these stories drip with a romanticized view of what it means to be intersex: the intersex person as a tragic, isolated figure,2 as an idealized blend of male and female,3 or as an exotic and objectified specimen.4 Such facile depictions make me wince, in part because I happen to know and care about more than a few intersex people. Through my life partner, openly intersex activist and physician Suegee Tamar-Mattis, and more recently through my work as director of a national legal project serving the needs of children with intersex conditions, I have come to know intersex people of many ages and experiences from around the world. Some have become good friends, some have become clients, and more than a † Executive Director, Advocates for Informed Choice. B.A., Brown University, 1991. J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law. I would like to thank Anna M.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report to the 6 National Report
    Shadow Report To the 6th National Report of the Federal Republic of Germany On the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) Compiled by: Verein Intersexuelle Menschen e.V. / XY-Frauen Association of Intersexual People / XY-Women Lucie G.Veith Neu Wulmstorf [email protected] Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing Wuppertal [email protected] Claudia J. Kreuzer Trier [email protected] Editor Intersexuelle Menschen e.V. c/o A.Kumst Slebuschstieg 6 20537 Hamburg Authors Lucie G. Veith, Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing , Claudia J. Kreuzer English translation Maggie T. Dunham [email protected] Contact Lucie Veith Postweg 11 21629 Neu Wulmstorf [email protected] Date July 2nd 2008 2 2 Contents Foreword / Executive Summary …………………………………………………. 5 Questions to the German Government …………………………………………. 7 1. Preamble and Article 1-5 CEDAW …………………………………………… 9 1.1 Definition - What is Intersexuality? …………………………………………… 9 1.2 Denial and Ignorance of the German Government …………………………… 10 2. Article 5a 10c (Education) ……………………………………………………... 11 2.1 Prof. Dr. John Money`s Gender Theories and their Violations to Human Rights ………………………………………………………………………….. 11 3. Article 12 (Health) ……………………………………………………………… 12 3.1 Problems in Parents - Child Relations ………………………………………… 12 3.2 Medical Experiments on Human Beings ……………………………………… 13 3.3 List of Human Rights Violations as a Result of the Treatment according to the “Standards” Developed by Prof. Dr. John Money …………… 13 3.3.1 Removal of Gonads (Castration) …………………………………………. 13 3.3.2 Genital Amputation ………………………………………………………. 14 3.3.3 Effective Protection of Rights ……………………………………………. 14 3.3.4 Documentation of Treatment …………………………………………….. 15 3.3.5 Irreversible Genital Surgery of Minors and Adults ……………………… 15 3.3.6 Off–Label Use of Pharmaceuticals ……………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Make It New: Reshaping Jazz in the 21St Century
    Make It New RESHAPING JAZZ IN THE 21ST CENTURY Bill Beuttler Copyright © 2019 by Bill Beuttler Lever Press (leverpress.org) is a publisher of pathbreaking scholarship. Supported by a consortium of liberal arts institutions focused on, and renowned for, excellence in both research and teaching, our press is grounded on three essential commitments: to be a digitally native press, to be a peer- reviewed, open access press that charges no fees to either authors or their institutions, and to be a press aligned with the ethos and mission of liberal arts colleges. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, California, 94042, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11469938 Print ISBN: 978-1-64315-005- 5 Open access ISBN: 978-1-64315-006- 2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2019944840 Published in the United States of America by Lever Press, in partnership with Amherst College Press and Michigan Publishing Contents Member Institution Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1. Jason Moran 21 2. Vijay Iyer 53 3. Rudresh Mahanthappa 93 4. The Bad Plus 117 5. Miguel Zenón 155 6. Anat Cohen 181 7. Robert Glasper 203 8. Esperanza Spalding 231 Epilogue 259 Interview Sources 271 Notes 277 Acknowledgments 291 Member Institution Acknowledgments Lever Press is a joint venture. This work was made possible by the generous sup- port of
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    Notes Introduction 1. John Money and Anke Ehrhardt, Man and Woman Boy and Girl: The Differentiation and Dimorphism of Gender Identity from Conception to Maturity (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), 9. 2. Rosie Braidotti, Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Differ- ence in Contemporary Feminist Theory (New York: Columbia Uni- versity Press, 1994); Georges Canguilhem, On the Normal and the Pathological, trans. Carolyn Fawcett (Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing, 1978). 3. I refer here to the late David Reimer, whom Money recommended be reassigned and reared as a girl following the loss of his penis after a botched circumcision when he was an infant. See Bernice Hausman, “Do Boys Have to Be Boys? Gender, Narrativity, and the John/Joan Case,” NWSA Journal 12, no. 3 (2000): 114–138. 4. Perhaps the most public of those attacks was that of Rolling Stone jour- nalist John Colapinto. See John Colapinto, As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl (Sydney: Harper Collins, 2000). 5. Refer to “Notes on terminology and definitions” for an explanation of this hyphenation. 6. Money on the other hand has acknowledged—however disapprovingly—the ways in which feminism impacted on his theories of gender. 7. This is not to suggest that gender ceased to be a language tool but rather that its conceptual load increased exponentially when it became the signifier of characters, behaviors, and identities as masculine or feminine. 8. Natural gender, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is a feature of modern English where “nouns are masculine, feminine or neuter according as the objects they denote are male, female, or of neither sex; and the gender of a noun has no other syntactical effect than that of determining the pronoun that must be used in referring to it” http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50093521?query_type=word& queryword=gender, s.v.
    [Show full text]
  • VHI-Newsletter-4-FINAL.Pdf
    VOLUME 4 YoNewsletter u of the r Voice Vo Health ic Institute e MISSION Voice Health Institute Hosts Raise Your Voice The Voice Health Institute (VHI) is an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit Research Fundraiser in Los Angeles public charity founded in 2003. The VHI is dedicated to advancing Patients as well as their family and Dr. Steven Zeitels for his 25 years of surgical laryngology and voice restoration friends along with world-renowned innovations and success in preserving through sponsoring innovative celebrities gathered to support the Voice or restoring the voices of thousands of basic and translational research as Health Institute’s (VHI) Raise Your Voice patients. Also honored was Dr. Robert well as promoting education and Research Benefit at the Beverly Hills Hotel. Hillman, Dr. Zeitels’ scientific partner, outreach programs. The event was held to celebrate the VHI’s for his contributions to voice research. Joe The VHI works in cooperation 10th anniversary of supporting voice Buck, the renowned sportscaster, served with Massachusetts General research and to raise funds for ongoing as Master of Ceremonies for a group of Hospital, Harvard University, research and awareness programs that will luminaries that included Honorary VHI Massachusetts Institute of Tech- restore speaking and singing capability Chairwoman Julie Andrews, Steven nology and other institutions. to millions of individuals whose voices Tyler, Lionel Richie, Roger Daltrey, Tom Voice Health Institute have been lost or damaged by disease Hamilton, Christina Perri, Paul Stanley, One Bowdoin Square, Floor 11 or trauma. The event, which included and Keith Urban. Roger Egan and Melanie Boston, MA 02114 prominent personalities from the sports Woodworth assisted Joe Buck in organizing (617) 720-5000 [email protected] and entertainment worlds, also honored this unforgettable evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Contesting Gender in Popular Culture and Family Law: Middlesex and Other Transgender Tales
    Contesting Gender in Popular Culture and Family Law: Middlesex and Other Transgender Tales SUSAN FRELICH APPLETON* I. CAL AND His COHORT They're everywhere: transsexuals, intersexed individuals, and others of uncertain gender classification. Transgender issues have come out of the closet as popular culture seems to have discovered a new favorite. Recently, several successful books and movies, not to mention frequent television coverage on both talk shows and science programs, have introduced the public to numerous ordinary people whose very existence challenges the notion that sex and gender provide life's fundamental organizing principles. In turn, the law's reliance on strict sex-based categories becomes increasingly fragile, indeed too fragile to withstand challenges to marriage laws requiring a male and a female. One of the most prominent pop-culture examples these days is Cal, formerly Calliope ("Callie"), Stephanides, the protagonist of Jeffrey Eugenides's Pulitzer-Prize- winning novel Middlesex.' Several reviews emphasize the theme of transformation in the story told by this delightful and sympathetic narrator, 2 who "was born twice: first, as a baby girl ... and then again, as a teenage boy." 3 This theme of transformation might explain why Eugenides decided on a protagonist with 5-alpha-reductase deficiency syndrome because such male "pseudohermaphrodites" appear female at birth and through childhood, only to experience at puberty the masculinization belatedly triggered by their XY chromosomes.4 In Cal's case, the condition comes * Lemma Barkeloo & Phoebe Couzins Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis. With the customary disclaimers about their responsibility for errors, the author thanks Martha Chamallas, Barbara Flagg, Henna Hill Kay, Laura Rosenbury, Nancy Staudt, Holly Stone, and Mimi Wesson for their thoughtful comments and Brandy Anderson and Kimberly Busch for their careful research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Adélaïde Herculine Alias Alexina Alias Camille Alias Abel Barbin Von Christof Rolker · Published 08/11/2016 · Updated 08/11/2016
    Intersex Day of Remembrance: Adélaïde Herculine alias Alexina alias Camille alias Abel Barbin von Christof Rolker · Published 08/11/2016 · Updated 08/11/2016 https://intersex.hypotheses.org/4501 Today is the birthday of Adélaïde Herculine Barbin – celebrated as Intersex Day of Remembrance around the world. Barbin was raised as a girl in 1838 but declared male at the age of 30, and committed suicide soon afterwards. It is very plausible to assume that the medical enquiry, the media coverage and the (unwanted) change of legal gender played a crucial role in Barbin’s decision to commit suicide. Having, involuntarily, become a cause célèbre already in his/her lifetime, Barbin’s sex and gender have continued to attract both scholarly and public attention. His/her biography is mainly known from the autobiography written shortly before the suicide; it was published first in 1872 and again, more than a century later, by Michel Foucault. Cover of the French edition (Foucault 1978). „Remembrance“ is tied to remembering names, so my contribution today is dedicated to Barbin’s names. As Fabienne Imlinger in her paper at the Zwischen conference observed, the multiplicity of Barbin’s names (and the association of the story with Foucault’s rather than Barbin’s name) is quite significant. On a more mundane level, the multiple names continue to confuse readers, and are likely to do so in the future – for example, Wikipedia entries in different languages vary as to which name they use. Yet „Remembrance“ for me as a historian is also a question of getting the textual history right, so let me first comment briefly on the transmission of the autobiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Butler's Foucault, Foucault's Herculine, and the Will-To-Know
    The Violence of Curiosity: Butler's Foucault, Foucault's Herculine, and the Will-to-Know Lauren Guilmette philoSOPHIA, Volume 7, Number 1, Winter 2017, pp. 1-22 (Article) Published by State University of New York Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2017.0000 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/660554 [ Access provided at 13 Sep 2020 15:50 GMT from Elon University ] essays The Violence of Curiosity: Butler’s Foucault, Foucault’s Herculine, and the Will-to-Know Lauren Guilmette As it is known, a doctor enjoys certain privileges with a sick person that nobody dreams of contesting. His face was distorted, betraying extraordinary excitement. “I beg you to leave me alone,” I said to him. “You are killing me!” “Mademoiselle,” he answered, ‘I’m asking you for just one minute, and it will be finished.’ His hand was already slipping under my sheet and coming to a stop at the sensitive place. It pressed upon it several times, as if to find there the solution to a difficult problem. It did not leave off at that point! ! ! —Herculine Barbin, My Memoirs, 68 As for what motivated me, it is quite simple; I would hope that in the eyes of some people it might be sufficient in itself. It was curiosity—the only kind of curiosity, in any case, that is worth acting upon with a degree of obstinacy: not the curiosity that seeks to assimilate what it is proper for one to know, but that which enables one to get free of oneself.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Five
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Sexual ambiguity: Narrative manifestations in adaptation St. Jacques, J. Publication date 2014 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): St. Jacques, J. (2014). Sexual ambiguity: Narrative manifestations in adaptation. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 Chapter Five “Beyond the Limits of the Possible”: On the Impossible Girlhood of Camille Barbin (aka: Alexina)1 In 1860, Adélaïde-Herculine Barbin, a twenty-year-old schoolmistress known to her loved ones as “Camille,” submitted herself to French medical authorities for an examination, complaining of pains in her groin. After detecting the girl’s “sexually indeterminate” features, and hearing her confession that she was attracted to other girls, the physicians charged with Camille’s care began to consider the possibility that Camille was not a girl (125).
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Aphallia and the Intersexual Challenge to Sex/Gender
    CHAPTER THIRTEEN The History of Aphallia and the Intersexual Challenge to Sex/Gender Vernon A. Rosario A great deal of media attention has recently been focused on the treatment of inter- sexuality (a variety of anatomical and physiological conditions historically called hermaphroditism). The tragic story of David Reimer (known as the “John/Joan case”) fi rst captured public attention in 1997 and was followed by numerous tele- vision documentaries on intersex conditions.1 Jeffrey Eugenides’ novel Middlesex featured an intersex heroine/hero and won a Pulitzer prize.2 The Intersex Society of North America (ISNA), founded in 1993 (before Reimer’s case was publicized), has also done much to publicize the treatment of intersex conditions. The media has focused on dramatic cases of sex reassignment, like that of David Reimer who, in fact, was not born with an intersex condition. ISNA, on the other hand, has struggled to refocus public and professional attention on the more common issue of genital “cor- rective” surgery rather than neonatal sex reassignment, which is rarely necessary or recommended by doctors. The media has also tended to present intersex as a single phenomenon or associate it with transsexualism when, in fact, there are a variety of syndromes of genital atypicality and the vast majority of affected individuals have no indeterminacy about their gender identity. ISNA has struggled to convince the public that intersex is not an elective identity position but a variety of objective, biological conditions. Along these lines, a group of ISNA affi liated doctors and board members have advocated a signifi cant nomenclature change: to discontinue terms employing “hermaphrodite” in favor of the term “disorders of sex development” (DSD).3 This change is also being endorsed by an international group of medical experts in the fi eld.4 The use of DSD would make clear that “intersex” states are medical conditions affecting the development of the sex organs, not matters of gender identity, dual sex, or sex reassignment.
    [Show full text]