Arxiv:0808.0627V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 5 Aug 2008 Representations of the Symmetry Group
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Condensate induced transitions between topologically ordered phases F. A. Bais1, 2 and J.K.Slingerland3 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Amsterdam, Valckenierstraat 65, 1018 XE Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA∗ 3Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Theoretical Physics, 10 Burlington Rd, Dublin, Ireland.y (Dated: May 28, 2018) We investigate transitions between topologically ordered phases in two spatial dimensions induced by the condensation of a bosonic quasiparticle. To this end, we formulate an extension of the theory of symmetry breaking phase transitions which applies to phases with topological excitations described by quantum groups or modular tensor categories. This enables us to deal with phases whose quasiparticles have non-integer quantum dimensions and obey braid statistics. Many examples of such phases can be constructed from two-dimensional rational conformal field theories and we find that there is a beautiful connection between quantum group sym- metry breaking and certain well-known constructions in conformal field theory, notably the coset construction, the construction of orbifold models and more general conformal extensions. Besides the general framework, many representative examples are worked out in detail. PACS numbers: 05.30.Pr,11.25.Hf. I. INTRODUCTION gously, traditional phases can be distinguished by the expecta- tion values of local order parameters, while different topolog- In both high energy and condensed matter physics, there is ical phases may exist which are not distinguished by any local a long tradition of studying systems which exhibit topologi- order parameter. As a result a number of indicators for topo- cal excitations. Recently, this field has received a new impe- logical order which are not based on symmetry have emerged, tus, since it has been realized that such topological excitations notably the dimensions of the spaces of ground states on spa- 9,10 may permit fault tolerant storage and manipulation of quan- tial surfaces of non-trivial topology and the topological en- 11,12 tum information1,2,3. In connection with this, there are current tanglement entropy . experimental efforts to prove the existence of nontrivial topo- Despite the fact that topological phases may not be fully logical phases in the fractional quantum Hall effect4,5,6,7 and characterized by their symmetries (or at least not by symme- to construct such phases in Josephson junction networks8. tries represented by local operators), one may often still orga- Topological excitations are usually introduced at the classi- nize the excitation spectra of such phases by using ‘symme- cal level as solutions to the equations of motion and the ob- tries’ that are not obvious from the Hamiltonian or Lagrangian servables that distinguish them are directly linked to topologi- of the system and which may in fact not be realized locally. cally invariant properties of these solutions. This places topo- Thus one may hope for a generalization or analogue of the logical particles in marked contrast to the more usual pertur- theory of symmetry breaking phase transitions which applies bative (quasi)particles. The latter are described as low energy topological phases, by allowing for such ‘topological symme- quantum fluctuations over a given vacuum state. The group of tries’. One of the main goals of this paper is to set up such symmetries of the system that fixes the vacuum state will act a formalism for the particular case of phase transitions which on the fluctuations and cause them to organize into multiplets. occur due to the formation of a condensate of bosonic quasi- As a result these perturbative particle states form irreducible particles. Before we go into a further description of this for- malism, let us make some remarks which we hope may pre- arXiv:0808.0627v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 5 Aug 2008 representations of the symmetry group. For topological parti- cles no such labeling is obviously present. vent confusion in reading the rest of the paper. A similar dichotomy exists when considering the ground First of all, we do not want to limit ourselves to ‘strictly states of different phases, or the order parameters that distin- topological phases’, which have no nontrivial symmetries rep- guish between phases. Traditionally, when a phase exhibits resented by local operators. In fact we will include the- ground state degeneracy, the different ground states would be ories which have a discrete symmetry represented by lo- related by the action of symmetry operators, but in topolog- cal operators but no nontrivial topology as a special case. ical phases, ground state degeneracies appear for models on We would like to point out that in gauge theories, electric topologically nontrivial spatial manifolds without the obvious charges, which are supposedly ‘non-topological particles’, intervention of any symmetry, and in fact the different ground coming from the locally represented gauge symmetry of the states can often not be mixed by any local operator. Analo- system, can have nontrivial topological interactions with mag- 2 netic fluxes through the Aharonov-Bohm effect, so in order to tem using only group theory. Still, it is believed that ev- describe the full topological order of gauge theories it is nec- ery type of topological order in 2+1 dimensional systems essary to take the usual gauge symmetry into account. can be described using the representation theory of a modu- Secondly, we will often speak of ‘symmetry breaking’ lar tensor category or, dually, a quantum group. The differ- when some of the symmetries involved may be gauge sym- ent types of quasiparticle correspond to the irreducible rep- metries. Gauge theories can be interpreted to a certain extent resentations of the quantum group and the fusion and braid- as constrained systems; some of the gauge degrees of freedom ing interactions are described by the tensor product of repre- are auxiliary and could in principle be eliminated at the price sentations and the R-matrix respectively. This asks for gen- of introducing very complicated interactions among the true eralization of the theory of symmetry breaking phase transi- physical degrees of freedom. In a theory with a gauge sym- tions to include topological symmetries described by quan- metry the physical states are the gauge invariant states, so the tum groups. In earlier work15,16, we have developed such spectrum does not manifestly exhibit the degeneracies of non- a theory of ‘spontaneous’ quantum group symmetry break- trivial representations in the spectrum and one may wonder at ing and applied it to discrete gauge theories. This theory the idea of a symmetry breaking phase transition. However, was later refined and applied to phase transitions in quantum despite the absence of gauge-variant states, the physics of nematics and other systems17,18,19. Recent work of Bombin gauge theories certainly depends on the invariants character- and Martin-Delgado20,21 also provides interesting realizations izing the representations that are present in the model and one of such transitions in models based on Kitaev’s toric code speaks of gauge symmetries as ‘hidden symmetries’. A simi- model1, which exhibits the same topological order as the dis- lar situation occurs in topological field theory, where the par- crete gauge theories. ticles often do not have internal degrees of freedom on which a symmetry could act, but nevertheless, their fusion rules can Quantum group A Irreps <=> excitations be described by the representation theory of a quantum group. in unbroken phase Hidden symmetry breaking is to a large extent analogous Breaking by condensate Injective map to the usual breaking of global, non-gauge symmetries. In the global case, there is typically a local order parameter that Intermediate algebra T Irreps <=> excitations breaks the symmetry and as a result, in the broken phase in broken phase the degeneracies due to the original symmetry are (partially) Kernel K Surjective map lifted, and the spectrum is now organized in representations Confinement of the smaller residual symmetry group. A gauge symme- Unconfined algebra U Irreps <=> unconfined try cannot be broken by a local order parameter (by Elitzur’s excitations 13 theorem ). Yet, condensates with invariant order parameters Irreps label are allowed and the hidden symmetry can effectively be re- strings / walls duced due to such a condensate. This phenomenon is usually referred to as the Higgs effect or the ‘breaking’ of a hidden (or local) symmetry. Bearing this warning in mind our philosophy FIG. 1: A schematic of quantum group symmetry breaking. After breaking we arrive at an intermediate algebra T that may have irreps which are in fact is to use the term ‘breaking’ in this cavalier way. confined. The low energy effective theory of the condensed phase is based on A well known example of topological symmetry occurs in the unconfined algebra U. gauge theories with gauge group ZN defined on a lattice in 2+1 dimensions14 In such gauge theories, the spectrum con- The general features of our symmetry breaking scheme are sists of charges, whose internal state transforms under the ZN as follows (see figure 1). Before condensation, the system is gauge group, magnetic fluxes (where flux is the topological described by a quantum group A and each particle carries an quantum number), which are gauge invariant and composites irreducible representation (irrep) of A. When particles carry- of charge and flux, called dyons. One sees immediately that ing the representation πc condense, the condensate will have the ZN representation label on the particles is not enough to an order parameter which is a state in the module of the rep- completely fix the sector, since it is blind to the flux. However, resentation πc. The symmetry of the condensed phase should one may introduce a second “dual” ZN symmetry – which is leave this order parameter invariant and hence the quantum not a gauge symmetry, and which acts on fluxes in the same group A is broken down to a Hopf subalgebra T ⊂ A whose way that the original gauge group acts on charges and which representations characterize the excitations of the condensed leaves states without flux invariant.