DOCSLIB.ORG

PILOT PENTLAND FIRTH and ORKNEY WATERS MARINE SPATIAL PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PILOT PENTLAND FIRTH and ORKNEY WATERS MARINE SPATIAL PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal PILOT PENTLAND FIRTH AND ORKNEY WATERS MARINE SPATIAL PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal PILOT PENTLAND FIRTH AND ORKNEY WATERS MARINE SPATIAL PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT Sustainability Appraisal Report prepared by: On behalf of the Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters working group: © Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to ob- tain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.scot Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at The Scottish Government St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG ISBN: 978-1-78544-399-2 Published by The Scottish Government, June 2015 Produced for The Scottish Government by APS Group Scotland, 21 Tennant Street, Edinburgh EH6 5NA PPDAS50860 (06/15) Table of Contents 1 Non-Technical Summary ........................................................................ 1 2 Introduction .......................................................................................... 10 3 The Consultation Paper for the Draft Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan .................................................................. 13 4 The Sustainability Appraisal (SA) ......................................................... 23 5 The Context of the Pilot Plan ............................................................... 26 6 Approach to the SA .............................................................................. 31 7 Baseline Information ............................................................................ 42 8 Findings of Assessment of Policies ...................................................... 97 9 Findings of the Assessment and Overall Effects of the Pilot Plan ...... 117 10 Conclusion And Recommendations ................................................... 143 11 Next steps .......................................................................................... 148 Tables Table 3.1 Key facts about the Pilot Plan .............................................................. 18 Table 3.2 General Policies in the draft Pilot Plan ................................................. 22 Table 3.3 Sectoral Policies in the draft Pilot Plan ................................................ 22 Table 6.1 Summary of objectives, their implications for the Pilot Plan and Key SA Questions. ...................................................................................... 34 Table 7.1 Scoping of Issues ................................................................................. 43 Table 8.1 Summary of the potential socio-economic and environmental effects of the General Policies. ...................................................................... 107 Table 8.2 Summary of the potential socio-economic and environmental effects of the Sectoral Policies...................................................................... 116 Figures Figure 1.1 The Pilot Plan Area ................................................................................ 2 Figure 3.1 Vision, Guiding Principles, Aims and Objectives of the Pilot Plan ........ 17 Figure 3.2 The Pilot Plan Area .............................................................................. 20 Figure 5.1 The context of the Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan in relation to other legislation. .......................................... 28 Figure 7.1 International Nature Conservation Areas in the PFOW Area ............... 51 Figure 7.2 National Nature Conservation Areas in the PFOW Area ...................... 52 Figure 7.3 Seal Conservation Areas and Haul Out Sites in the PFOW ................. 53 Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan – Consultation Draft i Sustainability Appraisal June 2015 Figure 7.4 Atlantic Salmon Special Areas of Conservation in Scotland ................ 54 Figure 7.5 Submerged Archaeology in the PFOW ................................................ 60 Figure 7.6 Coastal Archaeology in the PFOW ...................................................... 61 Figure 7.7 Landscape designations in the PFOW ................................................. 65 Figure 7.8 Geological Conservation Review Sites in the PFOW Area .................. 70 Figure 7.9 Coastal Geology in the PFOW ............................................................. 71 Figure 7.10 Seabed habitat in the PFOW area classified according to the European Nature Information System (EUNIS) habitat classification system.................................................................................................. 72 Figure 7.11 Eurosion Coastal Erosion Survey 2014 ............................................... 73 Figure 7.12 Eurosion Coastal Survey and Erosion Potential in PFOW ................... 73 Figure 7.13 Coastal and Transitional Waters Classification 2012 ........................... 82 Figure 7.14 Location of Shellfish Waters and Active Aquaculture Sites in the PFOW Area .......................................................................................... 83 Figure 7.15 Scottish fishery districts containing active coastal net fisheries in 2013 ..................................................................................................... 86 Appendices Appendix A Assessment Tables for General Policies .............................................. A1 Appendix B Assessment Tables for Sectoral Policies ............................................. B1 Appendix C Assessment Tables for Reasonable Alternatives ................................. C1 Appendix D Analysis of relevant environmental objectives ..................................... D1 Appendix E Compliance checklist ........................................................................... E1 Appendix F Draft HRA Record ................................................................................ F1 Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan – Consultation Draft ii Sustainability Appraisal June 2015 Abbreviations AEOI Adverse Effects on Integrity BAP Biodiversity Action Plan CAR Controlled Activities Regulations CCRA UK Climate Change Risk Assessment CO2 Carbon dioxide DECC Department of Energy and Climate Change Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Draft Pilot Plan Draft Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan dSPA Draft Special Protection Area EC European Commission ECC European Economic Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMEC European Marine Energy Centre EMF Electromagnetic forces EPS European Protected Species EU European Union EUNIS European University Information Systems FAA Fleet Air Arm FISA Fisheries Industry Science Alliance FSA Food Standards Authority GCR Geological Conservation Review GES Good Environmental Status GHG Greenhouse Gas HMPA Historic Marine Protected Areas HRA Habitats Regulations Appraisal IBA International Bird Area IMO International Maritime Organization IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee kV Kilovolt LDP Local Development Plan Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan – Consultation Draft iii Sustainability Appraisal June 2015 LLA Local Landscape Areas LSE Likely Significant Effects MAIB Marine Accident Investigation Branch MEHRA Marine Environmental High Risk Area MoD Ministry of Defence MPA Marine Protected Area MPS Marine Policy Statement MRIP Marine Renewables Infrastructure Plan MSFD Marine Strategy Framework Directive MS LOT Marine Scotland Licensing and Operations Team MSS Marine Scotland Science NERC Natural Environment Research Council NGO Non-Government Organisation NMP National Marine Plan NMPi National Marine Plan Interactive NORM Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material NPF3 National Planning Framework 3 NRIP National Renewables Infrastructure Plan NSA National Scenic Area ORJIP Offshore Renewables Joint Industry Programme OSPAR Oslo and Paris Convention PFOW Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters PMF Priority Marine Features PPC Pollution Prevention Control PPS Plans, Programmes and Strategies RAF Royal Air Force RBD River Basin District RBMP River Basin Management Plan RCAHMS Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland RLG Regional Locational Guidance RORO Roll-on roll-off RPP Report of Policies and Proposals RPP2 Report of Policies and Proposals 2 Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan – Consultation Draft iv Sustainability Appraisal June 2015 RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds RYAS Royal Yachting Association Scotland SA Sustainability Appraisal SAC Special Area(s) of Conservation SCI Sites of Community Interest SCOS NERC Special Committee on Seals SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment SEPA Scottish Environment Protection Agency SHEP Scottish Historic Environment Policy SLA Special Landscape Area SIMD Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation SMRU Sea Mammal Research Unit SNH Scottish Natural Heritage SPA Special Protection Area SpORRAn Scottish Offshore Renewables Research Framework SPP Scottish Planning Policy SSEPD Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution SSMEI Scottish Sustainable Marine Environment Initiative SSSI Site(s) of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RSPB Scotland
    RSPB Scotland Letter Writing Briefing Last Chance for Scotland’s Seabirds Our seabirds are the fastest declining group of bird species globally. In Scotland, coastal cliff-tops that were once immense seabird 'cities' have been left like eerily silent ghost towns. The problem will continue to worsen unless the Scottish Government takes action now. The Government is proposing 33 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that will protect some of Scotland’s most amazing marine wildlife, but unfortunately they ignore those most in need of protection - Scotland’s seabirds. MPAs have been proposed in different locations around Scotland’s coast and out at sea. These areas will protect important species and habitats from marine activities that could harm them. MPAs will do a lot to help Scotland’s seas, and the many creatures within them, but unfortunately, they will do nothing for the majority of Scotland’s seabirds. The Scottish Government argue that seabirds are already adequately protected, but this is not the case. We have seen terrible declines in many seabird populations over the last ten years and scientists predict that we could see seabirds go extinct from some parts of the country within the next ten years. We need MPAs that protect areas of national importance for our iconic seabirds, not just areas of European importance, which is currently the case. The proposals for MPAs must be improved. The Scottish Government must designate all the proposed MPAs but also add seabirds to the list of species to be protected. In addition, the Firth of Forth Banks Complex proposed MPA must have sandeels added to the list of species to be protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide
    Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide 2 Introduction Scotland is surrounded by coastal water – the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, there are also numerous bodies of inland water including rivers, burns and about 25,000 lochs. Being safe around water should therefore be a key priority. However, the management of water safety is a major concern for Scotland. Recent research has found a mixed picture of water safety in Scotland with little uniformity or consistency across the country.1 In response to this research, it was suggested that a framework for a water safety policy be made available to local authorities. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has therefore created this document to assist in the management of water safety. In order to support this document, RoSPA consulted with a number of UK local authorities and organisations to discuss policy and water safety management. Each council was asked questions around their own area’s priorities, objectives and policies. Any policy specific to water safety was then examined and analysed in order to help create a framework based on current practice. It is anticipated that this framework can be localised to each local authority in Scotland which will help provide a strategic and consistent national approach which takes account of geographical areas and issues. Water Safety Policy in Scotland— A Guide 3 Section A: The Problem Table 1: Overall Fatalities 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from National Water Safety Forum, WAID database, July 14 In recent years the number of drownings in Scotland has remained generally constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015
    Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm
    Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm A report to SSE Renewables January 2020 Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 3 3. Economic Impact of Strathy North Wind Farm 6 4. Community Benefit 18 5. Appendix A – Consultations 23 6. Appendix B – Economic Impact Methodology 24 Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm 1. Executive Summary The development, construction and operation of Strathy North Wind Farm has generated substantial local and national impacts and will continue to do so throughout its operational lifetime and beyond. Strathy North Wind Farm, which is based in the north of Scotland, near Strathy in North Sutherland, was developed and built at a cost of £113 million (DEVEX/CAPEX). Operational expenditure (OPEX) and decommissioning costs over its 25-year lifetime are expected to be £121 million. The expected total expenditure (TOTEX) is £234 million. During the development and construction of Strathy North Wind Farm, it was estimated that companies and organisations in Scotland secured contracts worth £59.4 million. The area is expected to secure £100.6 million in OPEX contracts over the wind farm’s operational lifetime (£4.0 million annually). Overall the expenditure, including decommissioning, secured in Scotland is expected to be £165.0 million, or 73% of TOTEX. Highland is expected to secure £21.9 million in DEVEX/CAPEX contracts and £51.5 million in OPEX contracts (£2.1 million annually). Overall, Highland is expected to secure contracts worth £77.0 million, or 33% of TOTEX. Of this, £25.6 million, equivalent to 11% of TOTEX is expected to be secure in Caithness and North Sutherland.
    [Show full text]
  • Members News March 2009
    FOR MEMBERS OF THE JOHN MUIR TRUST MEMBERS’ NEWS MARCH 2009 John Muir Trust members invited to NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN POST contribute to the ‘View from 2050’ Stuart Brooks has Lifestyles in 2050 will be radically different. before the Kyoto Protocol expires, 2009 been appointed Chief But will our wild landscapes and their is the final opportunity to do so. Our Executive of the biodiversity – and our relationships with government has already set a target of John Muir Trust with them - also be radically different? 2050 an 80% reduction in our greenhouse effect from 1 March might be more than half a lifetime away but gas emissions from their 1990 levels. 2009, following the it is a reference point we’ll be hearing far Achieving this will require radical social retirement of Nigel more of in the next few years. and political decision-making, re-thinking Hawkins. industrial processes, and will impact The ambition of the United Nations Stuart joins us from on all our daily lives. It will involve Climate Change Conference in the Scottish Wildlife Trust (SWT) where unprecedented individual, national and Copenhagen (COP15) in December is for he has been Director of Conservation global action. a binding global climate agreement to since 2002 with responsibility for land include as many countries as possible. If In its role of ‘promoting informed debate management, policy and communications, the world’s nations are to decide upon on public policy issues’, The David Hume as well as being the main account a new agreement to enter into force manager for key grants.
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure
    1 The Highland Council Agenda 9. Item Sutherland County Committee Report CC/ Caithness Committee No 16/16 30 August 2016 31 August 2016 Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure Summary This report presents a summary of issues raised in comments received on the Proposed Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) and seeks approval for the Council’s response to these issues and next steps. In accordance with the Council’s Scheme of Delegation, the two Local Committees are asked to consider the report and decide on these matters. The recommended Council position is to defend the Proposed Plan, subject to only minor modifications, which would mean that the next stage would be submission to Ministers and progression to Examination. Other options would involve further consultation on a Modified Plan. The report explains the implications of each way forward. 1. Background 1.1 The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three area local development plans to be prepared by the Highland Council. Together with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and more detailed Supplementary Guidance, CaSPlan will form part of the Council’s Development Plan against which planning decisions will be made in the Caithness and Sutherland area. 1.2 The Proposed Plan consultation for CaSPlan ran from 22 January to 18 March 2016. Around 201 organisations or individuals responded, raising around 636 comments. This includes a few comments received on the associated Proposed Action Programme. All these comments have been published on the development plans consultation portal consult.highland.gov.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Related Black Guillemot Surveys 2014
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 792 Marine Protected Area - related black guillemot surveys 2014 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 792 Marine Protected Area - related black guillemot surveys 2014 For further information on this report please contact: Laura Steel Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725236 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Swann, R. 2014. Marine Protected Area – related black guillemot surveys 2014. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 792. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2014. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Marine Protected Area – related black guillemot surveys 2014 Commissioned Report No. 792 Project No: 15115 Contractor: Bob Swann, North of Scotland Ornithological Services Year of publication: 2014 Keywords Marine Protected Areas; MPA; black guillemots; East Caithness Cliffs; Clyde Sea Sill; Sanda; tysties. Background In order to obtain information to support work on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), black guillemots were surveyed at two sites in Scotland, East Caithness Cliffs and Clyde Sea Sill MPAs, from late March to April 2014. The data from these counts was then compared with counts collected in a similar manner for Seabird 2000. Main findings 1,589 birds were counted in the East Caithness Cliffs MPA. Of these 1,569 birds were in summer plumage, this was a 67% increase on the 939 counted in the same sections for Seabird 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenland Barnacle 2003 Census Final
    GREENLAND BARNACLE GEESE BRANTA LEUCOPSIS IN BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENSUS, MARCH 2003 WWT Report Authors Jenny Worden, Carl Mitchell, Oscar Merne & Peter Cranswick March 2004 Published by: The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucestershire GL2 7BT T 01453 891900 F 01453 891901 E [email protected] Reg. charity no. 1030884 © The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of WWT. This publication should be cited as: Worden, J, CR Mitchell, OJ Merne & PA Cranswick. 2004. Greenland Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis in Britain and Ireland: results of the international census, March 2003 . The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge. gg CONTENTS Summary v 1 Introduction 6 2 Methods 7 3 Results 8 4 Discussion 13 4.1 Census total and accuracy 13 4.2 Long-term trend and distribution 13 4.3 Internationally and nationally important sites 17 4.4 Future recommendations 19 5 Acknowledgements 20 6 References 21 Appendices 22 ggg SUMMARY Between 1959 and 2003, eleven full international surveys of the Greenland population of Barnacle Geese have been conducted at wintering sites in Ireland and Scotland using a combination of aerial survey and ground counts. This report presents the results of the 2003 census, conducted between 27th and 31 March 2003 surveying a total of 323 islands and mainland sites along the west and north coasts of Scotland and Ireland. In Ireland, 30 sites were found to hold 9,034 Greenland Barnacle Geese and in Scotland, 35 sites were found to hold 47,256.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinochbervie Community Council
    KINOCHBERVIE COMMUNITY COUNCIL Draft Minutes of Meeting held on 24 November 2015 at The Harbour Offices Present: Gary Sutherland (Chair), Christine Mackenzie (Treasurer), Murdo MacPherson (Secretary), Kirsty Holland, Margaret Meek (Minutes) Also present: Hugh Morrison (Highland Councillor) Apologies: Mairi Eastcroft This was the first session of the new Community Council following the elections. Hugh Morrison welcomed the members and oversaw the election of office bearers. Position Name Proposed Seconded Chair Gary Sutherland Christine Kirsty Vice-Chair Kirsty Holland Christine Gary Secretary Murdo MacPherson Kirsty Christine Treasurer Christine MacKenzie Margaret Gary Hugh turned over the meeting to Gary Sutherland. 1.0 Minutes of 27 October 2015 The minutes of the meeting held on 27 October 2015 were proposed for approval by Christine and seconded by Murdo. 2.0 Matters arising from Minutes of 27 October 2015 2.1 Proposed Health Care Provision Changes Gary hasn’t been able to contact the NHS representative. 2.2 Manse Road House Margaret reported that the Community Company was hoping to seek funding for needed repairs from Highland Council through the Empty Properties Fund. 1 2.3 Geopark Murdo reported the following: The Geopark is now a UNESCO site along with all Geopark sites; this should give access to more funding. SNH intends to de-designate Duartbeg as a Natural Nature Reserve as it does not meet conditions for interpretation and paths; it still retains its SSSI protections. It is difficult for the Geopark to apply for charitable status because some of its activities are money-making; it should be possible to overcome this. Phil Jones from Assynt has queried the fact that there is only 1 representative from Assynt on the Geopark Board; there are 10 people on the Board – 6 from area Community Councils and 4 who are appointed but not designated by region.
    [Show full text]
  • Erection of a 15 M Wind Turbine at Kinlochbervie Roads Depot
    THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Agenda Item 4.7 CAITHNESS, SUTHERLAND AND EASTER ROSS PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Report No PLC/064/11 13 DECEMBER 2011 11/03694/FUL: THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL KINLOCHBERVIE ROADS DEPOT Report by Area Planning Manager SUMMARY Description : Erection of a 15m wind turbine Recommendation - GRANT Ward : 01 - North, West And Central Sutherland Development category : Local Pre-determination hearing : None Reason referred to Committee : Council development 1. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1.1 This application seeks permission for a single wind turbine at the Council Roads depot at Kinlochbervie. The turbine will be 15m to the hub and will have a rotor diameter of 5.5m, giving an overall height to blade tip of 17.275m. 1.2 Some basic visualisations have been submitted in support of the application. 2. SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 The site is the existing Roads depot which is on the road to Oldshoremore to the north of Kinlochbervie. There is a large metal clad building on site and various other structures associated with the depot. 3. PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 None 4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 4.1 Advertised : Neighbour notification and Schedule 3 Representation deadline : 11/11/11 Timeous representations : 3 Late representations : 0 4.2 Material considerations raised are summarised as follows: . Landscape and visual impact . Noise . The inability of the newly elected Community Council to contribute 4.3 All letters of representation can be viewed online www.highland.gov.uk, at the Area Planning Office and for Councillors, will be available for inspection immediately prior to the Committee Meeting. 5. CONSULTATIONS 5.1 Environmental Health: An assessment of the noise data supplied by the applicant indicates the noise level at the nearest noise sensitive location is calculated to be 27.19 dB(A) which is below the screening standard of 40dB(A).
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting with Police 4 November 2003
    Scheme THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Community Services: Highland Area RAUC Local Co-ordination Meeting Job No. File No. No. of Pages SUMMARY NOTES OF MEETING 5 + Appendices Meeting held to Discuss: Various Date/Time of Meeting: 26th April 2018 : 10.00am Issue Date* 11 July 2018 Author Kirsten Donald FINAL REF ACTIONS 1.0 Attending / Contact Details Highland Council Community Services; Area Roads Alistair MacLeod [email protected] Alison MacLeod [email protected] Tom Masterton [email protected] Roddy Davidson [email protected] Kimberley Young [email protected] Mike Cooper [email protected] Highland Council Project Design Unit No attendance British Telecom Duncan MacLennan [email protected] BEAR (Scotland) Ltd Peter McNab [email protected] Scottish & Southern Energy Fiona Geddes [email protected] Scotland Gas Networks No Attendance Scottish Water Darren Pointer [email protected] Apologies / Others Kyle Mackie [email protected] David Johnstone [email protected] Trevor Fraser [email protected] Stuart Bruce [email protected] Ken Hossack – Bear Scotland [email protected] Clare Callaghan – Scottish Water [email protected] 2.0 Minutes of Previous Meetings Discussed works due to be done on Kenneth Street at the end of August. Bear would like copies of traffic management plans and they will send details of their work to Scottish Water. D&E and Stagecoach have been informed of these works and Mike will get in contact with them to discuss in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney and Shetland North Suthe
    Draft Regional Locational Guidance – Wave Energy in Scottish Waters 3 NORTH The North Region three Scoping Areas of Search. The Scoping Areas of Search are: Orkney and Shetland North Sutherland Coast North West of Cape Wrath 3.1 Resource Orkney and Shetland 3.1.1 Wave resource is strong in the sea space that holds the wave area of search between Orkney and Shetland; the mean annual wave power densities that can be expected at this area of search reach a maximum of 40.5 kWatt m-1 and a minimum of 18.76 kWatt m-2. Mean annual wind power densities are of 34.4 5 kWatt m-1 in this area. 3.1.2 Summer mean wave power density is of 10.9 kWatt m-1 and winter mean power density is six times that at 59 kWatt m-1 . 3.1.3 Annual mean significant wave height is 2.48 m. In the summer the mean significant wave height is 1.63 m and the same figure for winter is 3.36 m . 3.1.4 Within the area of search the resource is higher towards the north-western part and decreases in the areas closer to the shoreline. North West of Cape Wrath & North Sutherland Coast 3.1.5 Wave resource is strong in the wave area of search at the North West of Cape Wrath, the karger of the two areas included in the map. The mean annual wave power densities that can be expected reach a maximum of 46.04 kWatt m-1 and a minimum of 27.59 kWatt m-2.
    [Show full text]