DOCSLIB.ORG

Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure 1 The Highland Council Agenda 9. Item Sutherland County Committee Report CC/ Caithness Committee No 16/16 30 August 2016 31 August 2016 Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan Report by Director of Development and Infrastructure Summary This report presents a summary of issues raised in comments received on the Proposed Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) and seeks approval for the Council’s response to these issues and next steps. In accordance with the Council’s Scheme of Delegation, the two Local Committees are asked to consider the report and decide on these matters. The recommended Council position is to defend the Proposed Plan, subject to only minor modifications, which would mean that the next stage would be submission to Ministers and progression to Examination. Other options would involve further consultation on a Modified Plan. The report explains the implications of each way forward. 1. Background 1.1 The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three area local development plans to be prepared by the Highland Council. Together with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and more detailed Supplementary Guidance, CaSPlan will form part of the Council’s Development Plan against which planning decisions will be made in the Caithness and Sutherland area. 1.2 The Proposed Plan consultation for CaSPlan ran from 22 January to 18 March 2016. Around 201 organisations or individuals responded, raising around 636 comments. This includes a few comments received on the associated Proposed Action Programme. All these comments have been published on the development plans consultation portal consult.highland.gov.uk. The following two matters are drawn to the attention of Members: the portal indicates a response date for some comments which is after the close of consultation; however, all the comments seen on the portal were received on time and the dates displayed are a consequence of administrative processes that the Council has had to undertake after the close of consultation; and on the portal, some comments on specific sites appear against the general settlement text rather than the specific sites; however the site reference number is given in each instance and future consultations on 2 plans will be designed such that this issue does not re-occur. 1.3 Additionally there was one late representation received, from HiTrans which is a Key Agency in the development plan process. This has been included in Appendix A to this report, under the Connectivity and Transport issue, and the Local Committees are asked to agree to take the comments of HiTrans into consideration and to ask the Reporter(s) holding the subsequent Examination to likewise consider them. Any other correspondence received from any party has not been registered as representations but referred to where appropriate and relevant in our consideration of the issues raised in representations. 1.4 Some comments are classified as objections because they either clearly state or imply that they seek modifications to particular parts of the Proposed Plan. There are other comments that are clearly in support of particular parts of the Proposed Plan. Appendix A (which is available on the Council’s website, in the Members’ Library and at Caithness House and Drummuie) sets out a full summary of the issues raised during the consultation, including any modifications that were sought to the Plan by those who commented, and officers’ recommended response. In accordance with the Council’s Scheme of Delegation (as amended in May 2016) it is now for the two Local Committees to consider the issues and agree the Council’s response. Each Local Committee is asked to consider the general issues for the Plan as well as the issues, settlements and sites directly within their area. 1.5 Appendix B (attached) provides an extract of Scottish Government’s Planning Circular 6/2013: Development Planning, which explains the plan-making process including aspects that are covered by statute as well as good practice and Scottish Government expectations. In considering the issues for CaSPlan and taking account of the Circular, officers have borne in mind that there are a number of types of decision that could be made: defending the Proposed Plan: if we do nevertheless see merit in a representation we may say so in our response, whilst defending that part of the Proposed Plan, and we would leave the Reporter(s) holding the Examination to make appropriate recommendations; making non-notifiable modifications (i.e. only minor modifications such as minor wording or typographical changes, not significant modifications); or making notifiable modifications (i.e. those that add, remove or significantly alter any policy or proposal in the plan); notifiable modifications trigger a requirement for further consultation before proceeding with the Plan. 1.6 Bearing in mind that there are a number of issues to consider, in its entirety the Council’s response could involve some or all of these decision types. It should be noted that if any notifiable modifications are agreed by either Local Committee this would trigger further consultation on the whole of the Modified Plan, not just the Modifications. In preparing any such Modified Plan, we would also need to prepare for publication alongside it an addendum to the Revised 3 Environmental Report and, if the proposed modifications changed the Plan’s housing land provisions, an update to the Housing Background Paper. 2. Proposed Plan Preparation and Consultation Processes 2.1 In May 2015 the single predecessor Caithness and Sutherland Area Committee received a report on the results of consultation on the Main Issues Report and agreed an Interim Position on the issues. In line with that Interim Position, officers then prepared the Proposed Plan which was considered and approved for consultation by the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Committee on 4 November 2015. Scottish Ministers expect the Proposed Plan to represent the planning authority’s settled view as to what the final adopted content of the plan should be. 2.2 During the Proposed Plan consultation a number of external parties raised concerns that they felt that the length of consultation and/or publicity of it was insufficient. Some also expressed concern about the emphasis the Council was placing on use of its consultation portal for the submission of comments. 2.3 The period of consultation on the Proposed Plan was 8 weeks, which exceeded the statutory minimum of 6 weeks for Local Development Plans. All statutory requirements for the consultation were met, and in some cases exceeded, in terms of making the document available and public advertising and direct notifying of the consultation. Additionally, members of the team attended Community Council training events to help raise awareness of the consultation amongst Community Council representatives and how to take part. This was particularly valuable given Community Council elections held within the immediate run-up to the consultation. 2.4 With regard to the use of our online consultation portal, we have been keen to encourage people to submit comments by that method if they can, given the benefits for customers and the Council. Around 84% of comments on the Proposed Plan were submitted using the online portal. Members of the team provided advice to customers who contacted us for assistance in using the portal, often resulting in online submissions. For those who were unable to submit comments using it, we provided alternative methods of submission. Any comments not received via the portal have subsequently been entered onto the portal by officers. 3. Highlights of the Issues 3.1 Appendix A (which is available on the Council’s website, in the Members’ Library and at Caithness House and Drummuie) contains full details of the recommended Council position on all of the issues raised on the Proposed Plan, including reasons for the recommendations, that need to be considered and agreed by the Local Committees. It will be the Reporter(s) who hold the independent Examination who will make final decisions on the issues. The following are highlights only (Community Council comments are highlighted in bold): 4 Vision and Strategy Vision – General support for this section. Several suggestions to provide more detail in the outcomes, however recommend against this as all four outcomes must be read together and alongside the rest of the Proposed Plan. Spatial Strategy – Recommend continuing to show National Cycle Route 1 on the Strategy map as it is, rather than identifying it as a sustainable/green travel tourism route as suggested by Ardgay and District Community Council. Settlements to which the Policy 3: Growing Settlements will apply – Recommend against the suggestions from Laid Grazings and Community Committee and Bower Community Council that Laid and Bower respectively be identified as additional Growing Settlements within the Plan (or that Bower be identified as a Settlement Development Area), as it is considered that general policies within the Highland-wide Local Development Plan and associated Supplementary Guidance provide a suitable and flexible framework within which to support appropriate developments within these dispersed settlements that have relatively low pressure for development. Housing Land Supply – Whilst the generous amount of housing allocations is noted the housing land supply is suitable and justified and assisted by the phasing of larger sites and the identification of longer term sites. Employment – Despite comments suggesting otherwise, the strategy set out in the Plan is considered to provide the best prospects for future economic growth of the area. Environment and Heritage - General support for this section. Recommend against the requests to designate new SLAs, amend Wild Land Area 35 and extend Kyle of Tongue NSA, as such actions are outwith CaSPlan’s remit. Connectivity and Transport - Recommended to include additional text noting potential for increased pressure on the road network as a key challenge in rural areas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RSPB Scotland
    RSPB Scotland Letter Writing Briefing Last Chance for Scotland’s Seabirds Our seabirds are the fastest declining group of bird species globally. In Scotland, coastal cliff-tops that were once immense seabird 'cities' have been left like eerily silent ghost towns. The problem will continue to worsen unless the Scottish Government takes action now. The Government is proposing 33 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) that will protect some of Scotland’s most amazing marine wildlife, but unfortunately they ignore those most in need of protection - Scotland’s seabirds. MPAs have been proposed in different locations around Scotland’s coast and out at sea. These areas will protect important species and habitats from marine activities that could harm them. MPAs will do a lot to help Scotland’s seas, and the many creatures within them, but unfortunately, they will do nothing for the majority of Scotland’s seabirds. The Scottish Government argue that seabirds are already adequately protected, but this is not the case. We have seen terrible declines in many seabird populations over the last ten years and scientists predict that we could see seabirds go extinct from some parts of the country within the next ten years. We need MPAs that protect areas of national importance for our iconic seabirds, not just areas of European importance, which is currently the case. The proposals for MPAs must be improved. The Scottish Government must designate all the proposed MPAs but also add seabirds to the list of species to be protected. In addition, the Firth of Forth Banks Complex proposed MPA must have sandeels added to the list of species to be protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide
    Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide 2 Introduction Scotland is surrounded by coastal water – the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, there are also numerous bodies of inland water including rivers, burns and about 25,000 lochs. Being safe around water should therefore be a key priority. However, the management of water safety is a major concern for Scotland. Recent research has found a mixed picture of water safety in Scotland with little uniformity or consistency across the country.1 In response to this research, it was suggested that a framework for a water safety policy be made available to local authorities. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has therefore created this document to assist in the management of water safety. In order to support this document, RoSPA consulted with a number of UK local authorities and organisations to discuss policy and water safety management. Each council was asked questions around their own area’s priorities, objectives and policies. Any policy specific to water safety was then examined and analysed in order to help create a framework based on current practice. It is anticipated that this framework can be localised to each local authority in Scotland which will help provide a strategic and consistent national approach which takes account of geographical areas and issues. Water Safety Policy in Scotland— A Guide 3 Section A: The Problem Table 1: Overall Fatalities 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from National Water Safety Forum, WAID database, July 14 In recent years the number of drownings in Scotland has remained generally constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015
    Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm
    Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm A report to SSE Renewables January 2020 Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 3 3. Economic Impact of Strathy North Wind Farm 6 4. Community Benefit 18 5. Appendix A – Consultations 23 6. Appendix B – Economic Impact Methodology 24 Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm 1. Executive Summary The development, construction and operation of Strathy North Wind Farm has generated substantial local and national impacts and will continue to do so throughout its operational lifetime and beyond. Strathy North Wind Farm, which is based in the north of Scotland, near Strathy in North Sutherland, was developed and built at a cost of £113 million (DEVEX/CAPEX). Operational expenditure (OPEX) and decommissioning costs over its 25-year lifetime are expected to be £121 million. The expected total expenditure (TOTEX) is £234 million. During the development and construction of Strathy North Wind Farm, it was estimated that companies and organisations in Scotland secured contracts worth £59.4 million. The area is expected to secure £100.6 million in OPEX contracts over the wind farm’s operational lifetime (£4.0 million annually). Overall the expenditure, including decommissioning, secured in Scotland is expected to be £165.0 million, or 73% of TOTEX. Highland is expected to secure £21.9 million in DEVEX/CAPEX contracts and £51.5 million in OPEX contracts (£2.1 million annually). Overall, Highland is expected to secure contracts worth £77.0 million, or 33% of TOTEX. Of this, £25.6 million, equivalent to 11% of TOTEX is expected to be secure in Caithness and North Sutherland.
    [Show full text]
  • Related Black Guillemot Surveys 2014
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 792 Marine Protected Area - related black guillemot surveys 2014 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 792 Marine Protected Area - related black guillemot surveys 2014 For further information on this report please contact: Laura Steel Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725236 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Swann, R. 2014. Marine Protected Area – related black guillemot surveys 2014. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 792. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2014. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Marine Protected Area – related black guillemot surveys 2014 Commissioned Report No. 792 Project No: 15115 Contractor: Bob Swann, North of Scotland Ornithological Services Year of publication: 2014 Keywords Marine Protected Areas; MPA; black guillemots; East Caithness Cliffs; Clyde Sea Sill; Sanda; tysties. Background In order to obtain information to support work on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), black guillemots were surveyed at two sites in Scotland, East Caithness Cliffs and Clyde Sea Sill MPAs, from late March to April 2014. The data from these counts was then compared with counts collected in a similar manner for Seabird 2000. Main findings 1,589 birds were counted in the East Caithness Cliffs MPA. Of these 1,569 birds were in summer plumage, this was a 67% increase on the 939 counted in the same sections for Seabird 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Bathing Water Profile for Thurso Bay (Central)
    Bathing Water Profile for Thurso Bay (Central) Thurso, Scotland _____________ Current water classification https://www2.sepa.org.uk/BathingWaters/Classifications.aspx _____________ Description Thurso Bay (Central) bathing water is situated on the north coast of Scotland adjacent to the town of Thurso. The designated bay is less than 1 km long and extends from Rockwell Point in the west to Little Ebb in the east. The beach is popular with bathers and water sport enthusiasts. During high and low tides the approximate distance to the water’s edge can vary from 0–160 metres. The sandy beach slopes gently towards the water. Site details Local authority Highland Council Year of designation 2008 Water sampling location ND 11697 68860 EC bathing water ID UKS7616085 Catchment description The catchment draining into the Thurso bathing water extends to 487 km2. The catchment varies in topography from hills (maximum elevation 440 metres) in the south to the low-lying land (average elevation 5 metres) along the coast. The main river within the bathing water catchment is the River Thurso which discharges to the east of the designated bathing water. Land use in the catchment is mainly split between rural land and bog. The principal rural land uses in the area are improved grassland (14%), shrub (12%) and coniferous woodland (10%). The upper catchment around Halkirk is mainly sheep farming with beef farming around Thurso. Less than one percent of the bathing water catchment is urban. The main population centre is the town of Thurso situated adjacent to the bathing water. Population density outside of Thurso is generally low (Map 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Migrations
    SOME PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THE MIGRATIONS OF SALMON (SALMO SALAR) ON THE COASTS OF SCOTLAND. BY W. J. M. MENZIES, F. R. S. E. Inspector of Salmon Fisheries of Scotland. — 18 — IXED nets for the capture of salmon were from low water mark. This practice of “out- first used on the coast of Scotland just overrigging” the nets is extending and this year it was successfully employed at the experimental marking F one hundred and ten years ago (ca. 1827) station on the west coast where only single nets and from the success which they immediately are still usually employed. obtained, and which has been continued, it is evident that the salmon in the course of their sea When lines of nets are fished in this fashion life come close inshore. At first no doubt it was and two lines of six or more nets each are fished not realised whether the fish were feeding or were with equal success within two hundred yards or so on migration when captured. In later years it has of each other, it is clear that the migration of the become clear that the fish have ceased feeding salmon along the coast cannot be a simple progress before they reach the coast and that they may be in one direction and in a comparatively straight line. considered to be then on their way from the feeding The Figures 1 and 2 are charts of St. Cyrus and to the spawning grounds. For long it was thought Lunan Bays showing the spacing of the nets and the that the fixed nets were only of importance to number used at each position.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting with Police 4 November 2003
    Scheme THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Community Services: Highland Area RAUC Local Co-ordination Meeting Job No. File No. No. of Pages SUMMARY NOTES OF MEETING 5 + Appendices Meeting held to Discuss: Various Date/Time of Meeting: 26th April 2018 : 10.00am Issue Date* 11 July 2018 Author Kirsten Donald FINAL REF ACTIONS 1.0 Attending / Contact Details Highland Council Community Services; Area Roads Alistair MacLeod [email protected] Alison MacLeod [email protected] Tom Masterton [email protected] Roddy Davidson [email protected] Kimberley Young [email protected] Mike Cooper [email protected] Highland Council Project Design Unit No attendance British Telecom Duncan MacLennan [email protected] BEAR (Scotland) Ltd Peter McNab [email protected] Scottish & Southern Energy Fiona Geddes [email protected] Scotland Gas Networks No Attendance Scottish Water Darren Pointer [email protected] Apologies / Others Kyle Mackie [email protected] David Johnstone [email protected] Trevor Fraser [email protected] Stuart Bruce [email protected] Ken Hossack – Bear Scotland [email protected] Clare Callaghan – Scottish Water [email protected] 2.0 Minutes of Previous Meetings Discussed works due to be done on Kenneth Street at the end of August. Bear would like copies of traffic management plans and they will send details of their work to Scottish Water. D&E and Stagecoach have been informed of these works and Mike will get in contact with them to discuss in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Thurso Tourism Workshops—Learning Summary
    Discover Thurso Tourism Workshops—Learning Summary Workshop Purpose The rationale behindLocalisation Workshops is to connect the peo- ple who interact with our visitors to the information than can enhance their time here and create a better sense of Thurso. Ever heard someone say Thurso under-sells itself? Discover Thurso workshops aim to empower people to not only sell the town, but to champion Thurso’s tourism offering. Why Localisation No other organisation across Scotland is responsible for or even qualified to specifically promote Thurso; it’s something we have to do ourselves. Many of our visitors may just be passing through on the NC500, or staying 1-night before heading to Orkney, but they’re a captive audience—they’re looking for things like golden sand beaches, 2,000 year old monuments, castles, whisky, Scottish food, the Northern Lights, traditional music and so on. Things we can offer readily. If we localise our knowledge and our conversations with tourists—that is, to focus them on Thurso— we’re spreading a positive message about the town to people who, even if they don’t come back to Scotland one day, will definitely be telling friends about wee places that caught their eye on the way round. What you can do… 1. Engage Tourists—Dornoch scores incredibly well when it asks its visitors whether they’d consider returning to the town, in large part to their hospitality. They asked their visitors what the most positive aspect to their stay in Dornoch was—the answer? Engaging with friendly locals. 2. Know the town, make recommendations—A Thurso bartender recently made a couple’s day when she was able to recommend Wolfburn and Dunnet Bay Distillery tours as activities for a rainy day.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlands and Islands Enterprise
    HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS ENTERPRISE A FRAMEWORK FOR DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT AMBITIOUS FOR TOURISM CAITHNESS AND NORTH SUTHERLAND Full Report – Volume II (Research Document) (April 2011) TOURISM RESOURCES COMPANY Management Consultancy and Research Services In Association with EKOS 2 LA BELLE PLACE, GLASGOW G3 7LH Tel: 0141-353 1143 Fax: 0141-353 2560 Email: [email protected] www.tourism-resources.co.uk Management Consultancy and Research Services 2 LA BELLE PLACE, GLASGOW G3 7LH Tel: 0141-353 1143 Fax: 0141-353 2560 Email: [email protected] www.tourism-resources.co.uk Ms Rachel Skene Head of Tourism Caithness and North Sutherland Highlands and Islands Enterprise Tollemache House THURSO KW14 8AZ 18th April 2011 Dear Ms Skene AMBITIOUS FOR TOURISM CAITHNESS AND NORTH SUTHERLAND We have pleasure in presenting Volume II of our report into the opportunities for tourism in Caithness and North Sutherland. This report is in response to our proposals (Ref: P1557) submitted to you in October 2010. Regards Yours sincerely (For and on behalf of Tourism Resources Company) Sandy Steven Director Ref: AJS/IM/0828-FR1 Vol II Tourism Resources Company Ltd Reg. Office: 2 La Belle Place, Glasgow G3 7LH Registered in Scotland No. 132927 Highlands & Islands Enterprise Volume II Tourism Resources Company Ambitious for Tourism Caithness and North Sutherland April 2011 AMBITIOUS FOR TOURISM CAITHNESS AND NORTH SUTHERLAND – VOLUME II APPENDICES I Audit of Tourism Infrastructure Products / Services and Facilities by Type Electronic Database Supplied
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Major Disasters and Accidents 59 17 Material Assets 61 18 Cumulative Impacts 63 19 Conclusion 64
    Redevelopment of St. Ola Pier EIA Scoping Report (ESR) July 2018 Redevelopment of St. Ola Pier CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 3 COASTAL PROCESSES 7 4 FLOOD RISK 9 5 MARINE BIODIVERSITY 12 6 WATER QUALITY 18 7 TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY AND ORNITHOLOGY 22 8 TRANSPORTATION 27 9 AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE 31 10 NOISE AND VIBRATION 36 11 WASTE MANAGEMENT 40 12 SOILS, GEOLOGY AND CONTAMINATION 42 13 CULTURAL HERITAGE 45 14 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL 49 15 POPULATION, HUMAN HEALTH AND SOCIO-ECONOMICS 55 16 MAJOR DISASTERS AND ACCIDENTS 59 17 MATERIAL ASSETS 61 18 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 63 19 CONCLUSION 64 Appendix 1.1 EIA Screening Opinion Correspondences Appendix 1.2 Existing Scrabster Harbour Layout Appendix 1.3 Proposed list of Consultees Appendix 2.1 Preferred Layout Drawing Appendix 2.2 Location of Sea Disposal Site Appendix 11.1 Operational Waste and Landfill Sites Appendix 13.1 Correspondence with Highland Council Historic Environment Team i EIA Scoping Report (ESR) July 2018 Redevelopment of St. Ola Pier 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report (ESR) has been prepared by RPS on behalf of Scrabster Harbour Trust (SHT) in respect of the proposed redevelopment of St. Ola Pier, Scrabster Harbour, Thurso, Caithness. An EIA Screening Opinion on the proposed redevelopment issued from Marine Scotland Licensing Operations Team (MSLOT) in March 2018 (Appendix 1.1). This Opinion determined the proposed redevelopment to be EIA development under The Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations), and as such an Environmental Impact Assessment must be carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Hywind Scotland Pilot Park
    Hywind Scotland Pilot Park Environmental Statement Habitats Regulations Assessment March 2015 COS_140158/01.2015 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Legislative framework 4 1.3 Approach to HRA 6 1.3.1 HRA screening 6 1.3.2 Appropriate Assessment 7 1.4 Types of European site included in the HRA based on qualifying features 7 1.5 Summary of studies / surveys carried out to inform the EIA and HRA 7 1.5.1 Seabird and marine mammal surveys 8 1.5.2 Migratory fish 8 2 HRA SCREENING – SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPAS) 9 2.1 Seabird populations in the Project study area 9 2.2 Long list of SPAs requiring consideration in the HRA 12 2.2.1 Identification of relevant SPAs 12 2.2.2 Long list of SPAs 13 2.3 Potential impacts on seabirds (impact pathways) 15 2.4 Assessment of LSE 16 2.5 Assessment of impacts on site integrity 17 2.5.1 Conservation objectives for SPAs 18 2.5.2 Collision risk 19 2.5.3 Disturbance / displacement 22 2.5.4 Conclusions with respect to SPA site integrity 24 3 HRA SCREENING – SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACS) FOR MARINE MAMMALS 29 3.1 Marine mammals in the Project study area 29 3.2 Long list of SACs requiring consideration in the HRA 30 3.3 Potential impacts on marine mammals (impact pathways) 33 3.4 Assessment of Likely Significant Effects (LSE) 33 3.5 Conclusion from assessment of LSE 36 4 HRA SCREENING – SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (SACS) FOR MIGRATORY FISH 37 4.1 Migratory fish in the Project study area 37 4.2 Long list of SACs requiring consideration in HRA 37 4.3 Potential impacts on migratory fish
    [Show full text]