Lifelong Learning Programme
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES TO SUPPORT NEW WAYS OF LIFELONG LEARNING
LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488
Lifelong Learning Programme
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES TO SUPPORT NEW WAYS OF LIFELONG LEARNING
Leonardo Da Vinci - Transfer of innovation LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 Book curators Francesco Macrì, Pietro Miraglia, Giuseppe Maffeo
Authors Elsa Zoffi, Massimilano Andreoletti, Giuseppina Scarciglia, Giuseppe Maffeo
Traslation and text revision Anny Ballardini, Sylvie Humbert Droz, Rachel Dixon, Paula Hubbort, Isabelle Rohmer
Cd-Rom development team Pierluigi Losapio, Massimo Zunino, Elsa Zoffi, Laura Belisari, Francesco Graziani, Giuseppina Scarciglia
Editing Laura Belisari, Francesco Graziani, Simona Molari
Leonardo Da Vinci - Transfer of innovation TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD
7 Which school, which teacher in the digital era F r a n c e s c o M a c r ì 19 The French catholic schools in the digital age Françoise Maine 23 English & Northern Irish catholic schools in the digital age Timothy Gardner, Gregory Pope
27 INTRODUCTION Pietro Miraglia
CHAPTER 1 The project: reason, aims, consortium, target groups, phases, outcomes
37 Web 2.0 technologies in teaching and learning 39 How can Web 2.0 resources be useful in schools? 42 Aims of the project 45 Consortium 52 Project target groups 52 The phases of the project 57 Results / Products
CHAPTER 2 Training activities, learning paths and ICT tools
63 Analysis of needs and structure of the course 66 Structure of the course 70 Contents and on-line activities 71 Questions and resources of the digital: digital natives, Web 2.0, Google Docs 74 Research on the internet: new modes of working 77 The analytical sitography (website): a new way to access information on the net 78 The phases of the research on the net 79 The interactive white board: a school resource 80 On-lin training: the didactic activity beyond the classroom 83 The research: the media and the students
CHAPTER 3 Project Monitoring & Evaluation: Quality Plan
89 The monitoring and evaluation model and the project phases 90 The monitoring and evaluation tools 92 Key outcome data analysis 92 Initial questionnaire 98 Intermediate questionnaire 104 Final questionnaire on the contents of the course 111 Final questionnaire for teachers who have followed the training activities
117 CONCLUSION
APPENDIX
121 Bibliography 131 Sitography FOREWORD
Foreword
WHICH SCHOOL, WHICH TEACHER IN THE DIGITAL ERA
Francesco Macrì President of the FIDAE
The challenge of didactic technologies
In the face of the explosion of new didactic technologies, FIDAE (Federazione delle scuole cattoliche primarie e secondarie d’Italia) thought it was indispensable to become the promoter of such a distinguished European Project that aimed to involve Catholic schools of different nationalities and of different traditions. The objective had to embrace two main points: the “didactic” aspect for its inevitable spin-off in the daily practice of educational activity and the organisation of school life; and the “cultural” aspect since it modifies the mental processes, the contents of consciousness, interpersonal relationships, interaction with the surrounding world, and self-understanding, that is, the intimate fibres of the humanity of each one of us. An initiative led in the full consciousness that it is our responsibility, as an institution representative of schools and of Catholic educators, to predispose students to actively embrace live IT phenomena. As a matter of fact, they are and will always be faced and conditioned by them. We thus have to help them to avoid being passive when faced with this powerful influence. It is our duty to support them; we must teach them to actively seize all their positive potential; help them to transform their immense bank of information and data in “knowledge” and “culture”; train them in how to surf and move around in the net of the cybernetic universe whilst keeping their freedom and autonomy untouched. This is an essential task for each school and each teacher1.
1 L. Masterman, Teaching the Media, 1998
7 This is even more important for Catholic schools and teachers, inspired by the great evangelical values of liberty and responsibility, whose central value is to place their attention and educational practices on the “person”, “unwilling” to be manipulated, homologized, or abused, be it only in a symbolical and communicative way 2. In order to realise these desired objectives, we at Fidae, through the present project on didactic technologies, have demonstrated our wish to show continuing commitment to bring to a conclusion a project that began many years ago, that aims to redefine and refocus a school, possibly contrary to its traditional methods, on the acquisition of research, experimentation, innovation and new learning methods. We aspire to build: schools that know how to distinguish more clearly, the “instrumental” range of the “means,” including digital ones, and the acquisition of the goals and of the values on which its own vision of life (Weltanschauung) is based; schools that can embrace in a critical and wise way the enormous quantity of data available on-line via this meaningful and useful cultural project; schools that are able to go beyond the closed and restricted space of their walls to open themselves to the immense horizon of the world, that breaks up some of its rigid bureaucracies and hierarchies to take upon itself lighter, more flexible, personalised, democratic and dynamically innovative modalities; schools that abandon multi-directional methodologies that create dependence and at times, even alienation (Ct. the well-known drop-outs) to adopt other more inclusive methodologies, capable of inspiring initiative, creativity, autonomy and collaboration. The Project: “Information and Communication Technologies to Support New Ways of Lifelong Learning” (LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488), which ended with a final meeting in Rome on September 29th 2012, has been promoted by FIDAE, and developed in a close and effective collaboration with Intesa Sanpaolo Formazione and the General Secretari- ats of the Catholic Schools of England (CES- Catholic Education Service), and France (EC- Enseignement Catholique). 14 schools across three countries have taken part in this project and it has been an experience of great importance and significance for those who have directly participated. Thanks to the materials produced and published both as a book and electronically, the experience will be shared with other teachers, thus spreading excellent practice that has all the requirements to become ‘food for thought’ for other European schools. It goes without saying that, when facing the complex and ever changing subject of didactic technologies, the Project will surely fulfil the task of being a first, albeit important, step in a process that will continue to be developed. This is an inception of an analytical process that will have to explore in-depth, and case by case, new and emerging as aspects that will arise. This hopes to be a conscious interpretation of a didactic that progressively measures itself against the challenges of modernity with- out ever losing its own cultural roots and the fundamental values of Italian, French, and English pedagogical traditions. As reported in the Index, there have been various issues on which the participants have worked. I strongly suggest that you read the publication in its entirety focusing on each individual topic. I will just give some brief considerations of a general nature that give a flavour of the Project, giving the underlying philosophy from which the project took
2 Benedict XVI, Address to Rome Diocesan Convention on Educational Emergency, 2007
8 Leonardo da Vinci MP ‘Transfer of Innovation’ – ICT-Based Learning: LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 FOREWORD inspiration and the general objectives to which we aspired. Inevitably, the entire survey of problems is not exhaustive, but our aims certainly capture several urgent issues that a modern school has to face in order to find the best didactic and pedagogical solutions in order that its epistemological statute and educational mandate do not fail. This mandate was assigned by society and the families that have entrusted the education of their children to us. These are issues which challenge the school’s validity, authority, credibi- lity, effectiveness, and quality, and therefore its specific contribution as an educational institution leading to the creation of a new and better humanity.
The reference scene
Among the most meaningful traits that characterise our postmodern society, a particularly relevant place is occupied by the expansion of the service and manufacturing industries, the qualitative change in the work-force, the financialisation of the economy, the spreading adoption of increasingly swift and planetary decision-making tech-niques, but above all, the explosion of information and knowledge3. The tools of this revolution are mainly electronic devices, telecommunication systems, computer technology, and their infinite combinations. The raw material is made up of data, information, scientific knowledge, rational thought, and human resources. Information and communication technologies (ICTS) are transforming all aspects of our lives and of our civilisation4. The change we have been going through is global and profound. As a matter of fact, a different, quicker, more complex, more widespread use of information means the opening of new virtual frontiers to knowledge and thought, and thus, to civic, social, and human progress. Within this scene of a progressive evolution of society, information technologies with their multiple and pervasive application, are not only a specific technology, but they are also foremost a “cultural” phenomenon. From being a tool they have now been turned into language, content and method5. They are a different way of being, as well as creating “culture”. They allow for an actual “mutation” of our minds, favour the passage from “doing” to “creating,” from the stage of concrete to formal operations and vice versa6. Since they offer important cultural tools (linguistic, conceptual, operational, and material), they become for us all an irreplaceable and fundamental element for our general development because they interfere with the human faculties of perception, memorisation, interpretation, manipulation and transformation of reality. Their growing relevance does not mean that we should lose sight of the fact that at the centre and above, there is (or there should be anyhow) and always will be Man, and not a machine, his intelligence, personality, morality and interaction with others. The qualitative leap that will thus be undertaken by each one of us resides in the direction of a growth, of a “surplus” in intelligence and freedom
3 P. Flichy, The Digital Revolution, 1996 4 Z. Bauman, Globalization: The Human Consequences, 1998 5 M. McLuhan, The Medium is the Message 6 H. Inose - J. R. Pierce, Information Technology and Civilization, 1984
9 for humanity. That is because the more the development of information technologies will be correlated to software, the more production activities will be transformed into services. New materials will depend on scientific knowledge and advanced technique and, international transactions will be virtual. It is anyhow evident that human endeavour will have to be directed to imaginative and creative activities in the use and organisation of processes and products mainly “immaterial.” All these operations presuppose a refined intellectual substratum and a high human content. It is within this aspect that we highlight the effort of growth and wisdom that each of us has to accomplish to equip himself to live in this new society. This is simply the old dream of Man, to free himself to the suggestive and fascinating Dionysian dream of “creating,” of dreaming, of imagining, of “versifying,” of enjoying without the heavy and monotonous weight of “having to do,” of “having to work”7.
The dimension of the knowledgeable society: acceleration, globalisation and complexity
One of the main objectives of the Lisbon strategy is to “make of Europe the most competitive and dynamic economy in the world.” It is interesting to notice how the European Parliament stresses knowledge and not Man’s technologies. The importance is Man as the producer and bearer of knowledge, not natural resources or financial- economic capitals. Man is the true resource, the compulsory passage toward a new season in the world. But in order for this to happen, a mobilisation of all the institutions, in particular of schools and universities, is needed. A further clarification is anyhow due regarding the European Parliament’s statement that the relevance of knowledge is not exhausted in the promotion of wealth and well-being, nor in the attitude of its standing with regards to competition of the global market. Knowledge is first of all a tool to progress in the direction of what we could define as the “civilisation of knowledge”8 where the cognitive dimension and the ethical dimension are not independent of each other, while they are joined in a relationship of mutual strength both on the level of the individual and collectively. In particular, collective cognitive advances determine a context able to recognise the true and the good behind the screen of the complexity of events and of the multiplicity of images, thus promoting the ethics of public life in the social, economic and political arenas9 recognises the ethical dimension as the fifth and final key necessary to face the future. Today, Man lives and works in a sort of time-space continuum. Time and space profoundly influence all individual and collective processes. Any change in the time-space relationships among people, things and events has necessarily deep consequences on the life of Man. The world of knowledge is characterised by well- known time-space change, including acceleration towards change and globalisation.
7 F. Nietzsche, The Gay Science; Dithyrambs of Dionysus 8 G. Olimpo, Società della conoscenza, educazione, tecnologia, 2010 9 H. Gardner, Five Minds for the Future, 2007
10 Leonardo da Vinci MP ‘Transfer of Innovation’ – ICT-Based Learning: LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 FOREWORD
Acceleration towards change means that the number of events that regard or interest us, or that we must keep in mind in a certain way, are in continuous flux. It is clear that time keeps on flowing as usual, but our perception is of an accelerated time in which the frequency of important events keeps on increasing. This acceleration regards many aspects of collective life, from the production of new knowledge (especially scientific and technological knowledge) to social changes, as well as markets. This means that the individual, in order to face new situations that appear, is on one hand obliged to deal with a growing number of new events or knowledge, and on the other hand, has to keep on answering questions to which he does not know the answer, or produce new knowledge that he does not yet possess. Globalisation on the other hand, concerns space. We refer to space as to the increasingly stronger interrelation between events, processes and knowledge, independent from their setting. Globalisation, like acceleration, impacts many aspects of the life of Man: scientific and technological development, products and markets, events and cultures. Globalisation requires man to increase his own range of action and awareness, and charges him to refer not only to what is close-by, but also to what is distant. It is logical that the terms “close-by” and “distant” have a space connotation, to which a cultural and conceptual connotation has to be added. As far as knowledge is concerned, digital technologies render space distance insignificant. From a mere technical point of view, knowledge becomes, at least at the beginning, immediately accessible, independent of its physical position or of the location of the person who is the bearer. The Net cannot be comparable to any single site of knowledge. It cannot be compared to a library or to an encyclopedia simply because of: the indeterminacy of its contents; the different means by which the contents have been produced or uploaded online; the different environments; or the points of view that created the content and of their level of quality and reliability. Man has thus to face different sites of knowledge that are not physical sites, but rather cultural contexts, conceptual approaches, points of view, some of which may be formed with personal bias and self-interest. The net of relationships produced by globalisation, the pervasive use of digital technologies, the fast spreading of knowledge, and the speed of innovation and transformation of some aspects of society, determine a growing complexity of phenomena, of systems (both natural and artificial), and of knowledge. There is complexity when the different elements that constitute a whole are many and inseparable (economic, political, sociological, psychological and affective ones for example.) and when there is an interdependent and interactive texture among them10. The knowledgeable society asks both man and the collective to face a constant complexity in learning, working and communicating. We could hypothetically end by saying that knowledge evolves according to a particular development trend thanks to the concomitant contribution of acceleration,
10 E. Morin, La testa ben fatta. Riforma dell’insegnamento e del pensiero nel tempo della globalizzazione, 2000
11 globalisation and complexity. In order to be a conscious participant inside our knowledgeable society, Man has to know how to advance along the three mentioned directives, which does not only mean that he has to have a given asset in knowledge, competences, cognitive and meta-cognitive tools, but he also has to know how to keep on evolving those assets in order to interact with an increasingly accelerated, globalised, complex society and knowledge. Such an outcome can be reached only if education has employed all possible initiatives (pedagogical, didactic, methodological, organisational, instrumental and curricular for example) to accomplish at best that famous principle by Montaigne: “A well made head is better than a well full head,” or the even more ancient statement by Quintilian: “Non multa, sed multum.” A principle that has undoubtedly been true in all times and for all societies, but especially nowadays in our information and communication society where man risks being crushed under the spinning and confused pressure of infinite communications and news, many of which are nothing but “garbage.”
In the kingdom of digital natives
In our society, where knowledge supported by new technologies, founded on swiftness and the quantity of given in-formation, and on the possibility of relating in real time with more people and more sources, a growing gap has divided young people, the so-called “digital natives” from adults, seen as the “digital immigrants.” These two terms, coined by Marc Prensky 11, illustrate in a suggestive and evocative way behavioural, communicative, and cognitive changes induced by the new technologies and omnipresent in the life of the new generations from their earliest youth. We are therefore compelled to think of the degree of consciousness that this new way of communicating carries and in which way it can contribute to the development of knowledge. This new relational universe is changing the way in which knowledge and culture have been developing. We are going towards a model of “convergence culture”12 that pivots around the concept of “collective intelligence”13, according to which “nobody knows everything, everybody knows something, all knowledge resides in humanity”. Digital media and interactive communication are the most striking phenomena of social change and of the cultural industry at the beginning of the new millennium. Today E-books, as smart phones and PC Tablets, which are continuously connected to the Internet, day by day challenge the realm of printed paper. But the new digital culture, i.e. the affirmation of a communicative style addressed to interaction, to the production of contents, and to sharing, has gone together with - in the past twenty years - the appearance on the scene of a new evolutionary form of Homo Sapiens: the “digital native.” But who are the digital natives? How do they communicate? How do they relate to knowledge?
11 Marc Prensky, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, 2001; From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom, 2012) 12 H. Jenkins, Convergence Culture, New York, 2006 13 P. Levy, Cyberculture. Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace, 1999
12 Leonardo da Vinci MP ‘Transfer of Innovation’ – ICT-Based Learning: LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 FOREWORD
Born and grown in the shadow of interactive schemes, the digital natives are technology’s structural “symbionts,” and the “technological prostheses” they have used since infancy, are an integral part of their social and individual identity. Since they were babies, they have played videogames, had a blog, and communicated on social networks like Face-book or MySpace. It is this generation of young people that the adults have to face at school. As Pierre Levy wrote14, theirs is a participative culture founded on the “production and sharing of digital creations.” We should therefore set up an “informal partnership” at school between teachers and students that leads the student to feel responsible for the educational project. In this new context, the teacher cannot be any more the “conveyor” of knowledge (if he has ever been), but “the one who eases” it, who acts as a filter between the chaos of the net and the brain of the student. These “digital natives” «have attended interactive screens since when they were born and see the Internet as the main tool for tracking, sharing and managing information»15. They are the very first high tech generation that thinks, learns, and understands in a different way from those who have preceded them. If for the latter, learning meant reading-studying- repeating, for the children who have grown up with videogames, it mainly means to solve problems in an interactive way (Ferri). The children who grew up with a console and a mobile phone, «have been used to seeing the solution of cognitive tasks as a pragmatic problem» (Lynn Clark). «Thanks to videogames, their knowledge is nourished by in-creasingly different symbols, challenges and narrative models» (Nishant Shah). «The technology of the adult generation was television that is an analogical model that establishes roles, responsibility and a structure of production, spreading, and consumption of knowledge. With the explosion of p2p - the idea of a Net where there is no hierarchy and everything is shared - roles are put in discussion and everybody feels an active part in the production of knowledge». If it is true that the statement: «The Internet said it» has risen to the authority of a verdict for children, it is undeniable that the Net is the mother country of “probability”. «The Internet is redrawing the borders of truth - continues Shah - and it sets great challenges to the educators of the twenty first century. How can you learn by using sources that do not have an institutional approval? How can you recognise a valid provider of knowledge amid the online chaos?» «The cut-and-paste culture and the veracity of the Net» tend to lower users’ critical perception: the Internet becomes for children “the source,” and they set aside the authoritativeness of the site and of the author, as much as the argumentative strength of the contents, thus generating a sort of demobilisation and disarticulation of intelligence and of thought to “surrender” into the hands of others who are often mere meddlers at the service of dominating powers.
14 Pierre Levy, L’Intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace, 1994; Les Tecnologies de l’intelligence. L’avvenir de la pensée à l’ère informatique, 1990; Cybercultura. Gli usi sociali delle nuove tecnologie, 1999 15 Paolo Ferri, Scuola digitale. Come le nuove tecnologie della comunicazione cambiano la formazione e la scuola, 2008
13 New homework
In the face of the progress seen in new technologies, on which, moreover, a great part of the future of nations will be played - within an unstoppable process of globalisation and international competition, together with the impact they have on the same individual and social nature of man - a profound and urgent revision is needed. This revision is in the way a school has to be and how it has to work. It cannot continue as if such a challenge did not exist16; it cannot cushion itself in its traditional sleepy complacency. It must change if it is to take on, as epistemologically founded, the principle that its “mission” is to be at the service of Man and of society, and to contribute to the development of these two inseparable subjects in a profitable dialogue and a positive interaction. Information technologies have in fact, produced a radical change in the modalities of knowledge and competence acquisition. They have been imposed as a new language, as a new model of knowledge, particularly appropriate to the study of complex systems, the great structural and super-structural processes, in front of which traditional knowledge models have shown to be “static.” The new digital era educational institutions cannot comply with those of the mere “oral” or “written” word17. They therefore have to take upon themselves and promote new organisational models, new methodologies, new curricula, new modalities to interface with civil and productive society, new offers of services, new knowledge, new competences, new quality standards. Essentially the professional profile of the teacher has to change. He cannot limit himself to “give out” information, as happened in previous decades, because new technologies are superior to him in these functions, whether it be in quality or in quantity. The new teacher will therefore be able to teach above all a rigorous studying and learning “method”; to offer critical “tools” to analyse reality; to develop intellectual and behavioural “habits”; to understand the “meaning” of things; to teach how to “arrange” information in an organised and systematic cultural design; to awaken “interest” and refine sensitivity;, to suggest “ethical” references based on values; to direct towards “motivated and autonomous choices”; to enhance attitudes of “tolerance,” predisposition to “dialogue,” to educate each student to “learn how to learn,” and to “learn to be” 18. It is only in this way that - in our information society, with the many fascinating and seductive informative agents (parallel schools) that multiply, and that often introduce themselves in a competitive way - the school and its teachers will not lose their social and cultural relevance that has been given to them by tradition. On the contrary, they will acquire a greater one because their role, their function, their meaning, their value, will be shown to be increasingly irreplaceable and important, since they will be qualitatively more evolved and of a higher formative profile when compared to the past. They will be more correlated to the integral promotion of Man, more projected toward “teaching the future” 19.
16 E. Cresson, Insegnare e apprendere. Verso la società cognitiva, 1995; CERI, Le nuove tecnologie dell’informazione. Una sfida per l’educazione, 1988 17 P. Levy, Collective Intelligence. For the Anthropology of Cyberspace, 1996 18 J. Delors, Learning: the treasure within, 1996 19 Botkin J. W., Elmandjra M., Malitza M., No limits to Learning, 1979
14 Leonardo da Vinci MP ‘Transfer of Innovation’ – ICT-Based Learning: LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 FOREWORD
The latest surveys on the introduction of the new technologies at school, report that teachers, not only in Italy, are not very inclined to use them in a didactic “daily” way, that is, to use them and to let them be used by their students within the “lively relationship of learning and teaching.” They instead limit their use to specific projects, that is to say, to experiences, that even if in one way might be considered innovative, are nevertheless “added on” to their habitual didactics. The most common interpretation of such professional behaviour refers to the fact that teachers belong to a generation for whom information and communication technologies are, in the best case, a “second language,” while for the digital native students they are instead their “mother tongue.” In addition to this, there are other factors that inhibit the solution of the problem that leads to the perception of the same professional profile. Among these, the conviction that Information and Communication technologies interfere with many of the characteristics of traditional “transmissible” didactics, starting from the control of modalities, the tools, the contents and the learning processes, based on a lecture with the teacher in the classroom, and in textbooks. But those who are fond of ICTs appreciate the innovative potential, that make them wish for a radical renewal of school systems. They see the sword by which they can cut the knots that we have not been able to undo until now. It is anyhow obvious that a professional staff with a higher average age prefers conservative attitudes through defensive reactions, and even refusal. These teachers are facing a subject that they are learning within brand new contexts in comparison to the ones in which they were educated. For the first time in history, children and young people know more than their teachers, and move around more easily than adults when they face an innovation that ends up being fundamental for the new society. We are paradoxically talking of a reversal of the roles in relation to traditional education by which the teachers were the ones “to know,” and the ignorant youth “had to learn.” But this cannot but arouse a certain “fear” since it triggers a crisis of the teacher’s authority which is founded on the possession of a necessary knowledge that the students do not yet have. It undermines the very foundation, the self-representation and the professional identity of teachers based on the exclusive management of the kind of knowledge to be conveyed. It thus determines the need to define again a role that cannot be only centred mainly on the transfer of knowledge 20. Some questions arise: with the didactic use of ICTs, what can the specific role of school become, and in which ways can we give substance to the work of the teacher? Moreover, once that information is directly available to the student, how does one control learning which has come about from a tool which may not be as standardised, as the textbook was, because it provided fixed information that did not change according to the circumstances under which it was used (for example in the classroom and at home)? But more and different contradictions have been outlined in the opposing natures of a linear, sequential, structured, argumentative, mainly deductive approach, as carried out by traditional school education, and the exploration of the Net and hyper-textual logics induced by the Internet. The students are not and cannot be represented as, “tabulae rase” on which to write, sponges waiting to absorb notions and methods. The ease in
20 F. Faiella, Progettare la didattica costruttivista, 2009
15 accessing information and the explorative freedom in surfing the web, have given them a sensation of mastery and of autonomy that “the school of transfer” has not foreseen. It is no wonder if then, in the face of these questions, and in the absence of solutions validated by pedagogical theories, and by the results of verified investigations, teachers (certainly not all) tend to limit the use of the new technologies to spaces and to specific, occasional, episodic projects; or they tend to “bend” them to their old teaching methods, thus weakening their possibilities. Emblematic of this today is the minimal use of IWBs (interactive whiteboards) taken back to the levels of the old slate blackboards. Explicit and huge is thus the contrast between the traditional systems of acquiring of knowledge, and the “democratisation” of the access to knowledge opened by the ICTs. Traditional acquisition of knowledge is one thing, by which I mean the heritage of a professional class that has decided how much, when, and how to convey that knowledge to others, and how to assess the results. Circular knowledge differs from this in that it is peer exchange and what is promised by the Internet. The journey from “unidirectional” knowledge (from one to many) to “circular” and “multidi-mensional” knowledge (from many to many) can be seen as a leap into the unknown, quite a contrast! We inevitably need to learn how to manage learning systems by defining again theories and practices; by experimenting with new modalities in teaching and learning; and in organising institutions, by investing massively in the development of the teaching staff; pairing teachers with experts as they plan and carry out new methodologies. In this way we will over-come the illusion that it is possible to automatically renew the school by simply introducing the new technologies as if they were the panacea of quality. One fact is by now certain and visible to all: the new didactic technologies are a reality. It is not possible to close our eyes any more. A school that pretends it is “immune” to their influence, believing it can succeed in living in an imaginary space out of time, would lose the basic legitimacy, attractiveness and credibility to continue its educational work. Visible signs of a rejection by young people, of traditional learning styles and discourse as well as cognitive grammars that the schools continue to hold onto, can be detected in certain teenagers’ overwhelming demotivation to attend school. This is due to our failure to accept the new context that has been built around and inside (that is to say, the stu- dents) schools. If we were to keep on losing time by delaying solutions that are by now inevitable, it would be a terrible defeat for our schools.
The primacy of intelligence
For the reasons mentioned above, schools not only have to face the challenges of new technologies although they may fear an improbable competition, or hold an unfounded inferiority complex, but they must know how to take the opportunity at this favourable time to “purify” the identity of its role. These challenges force schools to reassess outcomes and methods that had been gradually lost or tainted with mass schooling. It will have to prioritise functions that have been delayed by other secondary or marginal ones. It will therefore recapture the most effective ways to create the primacy of knowledge over information, of creativity over repetitiveness, of critical thought over passive thought, of research over compilation, of imagination over imitation, of originality (divergent thought)
16 Leonardo da Vinci MP ‘Transfer of Innovation’ – ICT-Based Learning: LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 FOREWORD over standardisation and homogenisation, of singularity over standardisation.21. It is in this way that schools will fully accomplish the role society has given them and is expecting from them, which is to prepare young people to embrace modern changes related on the one hand to the explosion of information and on the other to technological innovation, by investing all their energies into the promotion of intelligence22, that is, in the capacity of thinking, discovering, setting and problem solving, using knowledge together with multimedia technologies in an increasingly refined way. An extremely expressive term is used in the U.S.A. to refer to the new emerging professional workers tied to computer technologies: “knowledge workers.” The term highlights in a suggestive way, the centrality of knowledge in our post-industrial society and expresses the fact that, in the face of an extremely quick evolution of machinery, what remains stable, is the knowledge of problems, interpersonal communication, and the interactive communication between Man and the machine. It goes without saying that the explosion of information technologies, and of communication cannot be explained without studying in-depth the previous symmetrical explosion of knowledge that is simultaneously both its “cause and effect.” This is because computer science and data communication introduce into the organsational systems a set of complexities. If you take them “on their own” as a remedy to simplify the management of knowledge, you risk at the very least leaving things as they are. It is thanks to these new technologies that “new knowledge” emerges, develops, and is accumulated. It is more abstract and more concretely efficient, unitary in its scientific and methodological foundations, and flexibly suited to each situation. It does not take the place of previous knowledge, but it integrates it, transforms it and expresses it in new instrumental goods and with new combinations. Knowledge through information technologies is unified through logic-linguistic rules that express it and make it rigorously communicable, thus inter-subjective. It is moreover defined through operations needed for its validation and its use. Two different approaches are thus combined with electronic technologies, and this brings about highly innovative results: - The availability of “abstract knowledge” capable of acquiring any other knowledge, be it scientific or technological; - The availability of knowledge, defined in “operational” terms and thus expressed in language able to “instruct machines” to perform applicative sequences of knowledge; - The joining of “knowledge” and of “knowing how to.” We are therefore talking of deal- ing with how to overcome the lack of knowledge and of how to use acquired knowl- edge, which is defined by the recent psychological research on learning as “inert knowledge”; - The overcoming of our own isolation through a world net circuit (the Internet) that embraces the entire human village in its infinite diversities and richness.
21 Ott M.- Pozzi F., Usare le TIC per sviluppare la creatività a scuola, 2009; A. Mattelart, Mapping World Communication, 1994; M. Lipman, Thinking in Education, 2003 22 G. Cottier, Etica dell’intelligenza, Roma 2003
17 Conclusion
Information and communication technologies in their multiple applications and developments, introduce an element of progressive and accelerated “intellectualisation” of society. Such intellectualisation resides in synthesis, in both the request for increasingly more marked attitudes towards formalisation and logical rigour, in the solution of problems, and first of all, in the ability to both conceive a problem and to recognise it as such. This statement should be able to reassure all those who have been exasperated by what they see as failure and who perceive the new technologies as a threat to their intelligence. By paraphrasing a famous book by Umberto Eco23, and in relation to the new didactic technologies, it would be useful for those who work in the world of school, not to have any prejudices, nor see them as being catastrophically “apocalyptic,” nor to be naively “integrated.” As with all that humans encounter, even these technologies have their own “ambivalence,” their own “fundamental” ambiguity. On their own, they are neither good nor bad. It depends on the use you make of them, on the aims you wish to reach, on the meaning given to them and on the place that is allowed them within the overall context of your own existence. They certainly have an enormous potential that could be used at school, but one condition has to be kept well in mind: teachers should be actually “keen” to work with new tools. It is not enough to equip school with sophisticated and innovative equipment. It is the professional quality of teachers to make these changes: to use their ability to adapt once more their traditional methods of professorial and unidirectional teaching; their availability in prioritising the collaborative and autonomous learning processes of their students; their capacity to take risks by not seeing themselves as the only holders of knowledge. If teachers are helped by the institutions in charge of their development (and Fidae’s dedication to this Project has this explicit outcome) to carry out in a positive way this renewed role and task, then we can be sure that the new didactic technologies will have entered schools successfully, and that students will achieve high results which are the basic tools to enable them to fulfill their citizenship in an active and responsible way, in our world full of knowledge. Otherwise, schools will have lost an important opportunity, and other information and development agencies will supplant it from all sides, making schools redundant, expensive, and barely meaningful in the eyes of young people. The new didactic technologies are a great challenge for all; they open an exciting and fresh scenario. Those who succeed will harvest the fruit of this new “tree of knowledge.” The others will be excluded. And such an exclusion will make them even weaker, more marginal, poorer, lesser citizens, but even lesser men.
23 Umberto Eco, Apocalittici ed integrati, Milano, 1993
18 Leonardo da Vinci MP ‘Transfer of Innovation’ – ICT-Based Learning: LLP-LdV-TOI-10-IT-488 FOREWORD
Foreword
FRENCH CATHOLIC SCHOOLS IN THE DIGITAL AGE
Françoise Maine
Approach chosen for a particular context
The Leonardo project, “information and communications technologies to support new ways of lifelong learning”, which we have taken part in, rightly points out the importance of taking into account, by the school, major changes in our society. The digital world is already present in this century and new uses of communication and relationship are making profound demands of schools. Because of the current revolution, catholic schools have chosen to exceed the single stage of the technological revolution in order to work on the impacts of the cultural and cognitive on going revolution. Also in our national approach, we have risked approaching the subject via culture, further exploring new uses and codes to better understand the contemporary world. Whilst being very attentive to new teaching practices and social changes, we remain vigilant to ensure that screens do not harm the quality of human relations.
An ongoing story
French catholic schools have always had the possibility to freely innovate and explore varying degrees of autonomy within their institutions. Innovation is an educational and pedagogical basic principle of the founding fathers of Catholic education. Our national approach is thought to help teams to dare to invent new practices, to venture into new territories. The digital culture is opening up new areas that we must learn to understand and which are sources of new educational challenges.
19
To take into account all these changes, the National Committee of catholic schools voted in June 2009 a law that defines the elements of an education policy. Since then, an practical strategy was implemented to meet the needs of the institution:
- Establishing a national network of co-ordinators of digital technology, located throughout the country they are the first point of contact alongside the Diocesan Directors of this national policy. These co-ordinators work together regularly, building practical tools and working with the institutions concerned. - The setting up, every 2 years, of the digital “printemps”, a national conference for several days of collaborative work ,that brings together 500 participants who are experts in this field,. The second one has just taken place in Biarritz, the theme was “What if learning has changed”? And it deepened our understanding of changes induced by cognitive practices of the digital culture. On this occasion, we showcase original practices implemented in schools, in the form of awards for innovation. - The creation of a ‘pocket’ film festival aimed at students: “Infilmement petit”. This is an original approach of producing short films of 3 minutes duration, using mobile phones and digital tablets for example. In other words, how to make sense of something and develop a personal perspective with the digital tools of today (www.infilmementpetit.fr). - A portal site is being renovated; it brings together several digital spaces dedicated to the development of digital culture as well as an exchange of experiences and common theoretical benchmarks (http://www.ecolenumeriquepourtous.fr. - experience of the PENSIONNAT DU SACRE’ COEUR of Reims, partner in the Leonardo project, will be published on this site).