DOCSLIB.ORG

Life of John Morton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Life of John Morton P R E F A E C . T H ERE a re some cha racters in E nglish politica l life whose place as m akers of history is well e n e bu t f o ot e cau ses oste t has d fi d , r m h r p ri y well n igh fo rgotten th e impo rta n t pa rt they a e a n d t e e o es ave cease to pl y d , h ir m m ri h d oc u h u n In th f of o n c py t e p blic mi d . e li e J h o ton sc o a ecc es ast c a nd sta tes an we M r , h l r, l i i , m , ave suc a v ct c cu stan es sto ans h h i im to ir m c . H i ri ’ ” ave e as se ance o o ton s Fork h mph i d Ch ll r M r , a nd lost sight o f the ma n who pu t an end to c v war an d u n te for eve th e va fact ons i il , i d r ri l i h of t e White a nd Red Roses. Although he was th e most rema rkable E nglishma n of th e la tter half o f the fifteen th cen tur an d se ve his co un t ost fa t fu y, r d ry m i h lly a nd ably ; y et the Reforma tion of the si xteen th cen tu t its est uct on of anc en t usa es ry, wi h d r i i g , e ous ouses a nd ecc es ast ca o nu en ts r ligi h , l i i l m m , ec se the n f its ea test men lip d memory of o e o gr . It is too often forgotten that the fifteen th vi L IFE or J OH N MORTON . ce n tu r n vente n t n and t the mu t y i d pri i g, , wi h l i ca t o n o f oo s so e th e see of the pli i b k , w d d efo a t on f the s xte n t c ntu It is R rm i o i e h e ry. so lem n ly asserted that for several generations o ur const tu t on was in a e ance law was i i b y , d s e a e ea n n and e on e e a t t e i r g rd d, l r i g r ligi w r h ir o est e ene ac a uses of all n s a o un e l w d g r y, b ki d b d d , a nd tha t even the freer spirit and reformi ng t e n dencies ex hibited by the Chu rch were owi ng to the di visions and consequent weakness which bot n s an s s en even h Ki g d Pope di pla yed . Wh th e oo is ex a ne the ev t e e is eason g d pl i d by il , h r r t su s o pect prej udice and perve rsion . The su bj ect of this m emoir is the pri ncipal V lctm‘l of this ha rd a nd un merited sentence of ’ o b v on . H e ma e th e u o nast a nd li i d T d r Dy y, h is n a e is u e u n his own ea n m b ri d der cr tio . Sir Tho mas M o re is sa id to be the first writer ” o f o e n n s but it was a na o ton m d r E gli h , C rdi l M r w h o ot su e n ten e h is e ucat on se n t b h p ri d d d i , him t o co e e and afte a s e o e in h is ll g , rw rd mpl y d him se v ce and ose e a a e na at ves and r i , wh r m rk bl rr i c on versations are supposed to be th e Arch ’ b s o s wn s i h p o word . efo e t en it is sou t to e ace th e B r , h , gh r pl Ca rdi nal on the pedestal of his own self- made os t on let it be conce e t at o n o ton p i i , d d h j h M r PREFACE. vfi was f o ea ea s a st n u s e man a r m rly y r di i g i h d , o u a ma n a nd a ma n e ov e a t O xfo . p p l r , b l d rd H e was th e chief civ il a nd ecclesias tical la wye r f h is w f o t es. H e as a n act v e ma n o us n ess im i b i , a n d a e n e t at H e was th t ust f n bl go i or. e r ed rie d a u n V s c a f his n d co ncillo r of H e ry I. (e pe i lly o u n V n n VII ee of a I . a d of e Q ), Edw rd , H ry ’ a n d if a es ea e s a is co ect h e was Sh k p r pl y rr , u nc f V d un h a co o o a . an te t e v ill r Edw rd , i d ri l as fact ions of York and Lanc ter. S u ch a life deserves the most ca reful trea t In ment a t th e ha nds of th e biographer. a ttempti ng to do him j u stice my i ndebted ness to th e followi ng is gratefu lly a ckn owledged The au thorities o f the British M useu m Readi ng Room a n d the Archbishop of Ca n terbury for references to the L ambeth L ibra ry ; his li nea l - l s u escen a n t . an se Ple del e P d d , J C M l y , E q ir , L for u se of H en r VI! P r in ce A r t/cu r a n d y , Ca r din a l fil or ton th e R ev . oz e , by T M l y , ’ an d o n Bu dden s B io r a /zzkal Skate/z M . A . , j h g p ’ - Ca r din a l M or ton t . a nse Ple dell s of , wi h Mr M l y ’ ' eface . tc en s ecent wo Ooedzen tia r pr ; Dr Ki h r rk, y ’ l t/mn W n c/tester L a n ca ter R l s . wi s i s o of S S , ’ a n d Yor k . Ra sa utc ns , by Sir j H m y ; H hi ' Dor set Studen t s H islo o E n la nd . i f g , by M . a ne E l Recor d TIze Ch r on icle S R. G rdi r ; y s ; viii LIFE OF OH N MORTON J . ' o . H a r d in anc s acon H istor o f j y g ; Fr i B , y f ' V ] E n la n d a r n H en ry I . of g F bya n s C o y cle ; . s The A r chitectur a l H istor . R Willi , y ; R C ’ J enki ns Ca nter hu ry M emoir s of Sir Thomas ’ M or e Dea n H ook s L ives of the A r ehhish ops ’ Ca rdinal Bonaven tura s hf ir r on r of the B lessed L ife of j esus Ch r ist; L ife a n dR eig nof E dwa r d ' a nd R icha r d . a e . oo s V. by Ed H ll ; A W d A ntient a nd P r esen t State of the Colleges a nd ' H a lls of the Un iver sity of Oxf br d ; J eaffreson s ’ A n na ls of Oxf or d ; J ohn Ayliffe s The A n tient a n d P r esent State of the Un iver sity of Oxf or d ’ Brodrick s H istory of the Un zver sity of Oxf or d ’ E chs o h u r ch H is r u po f C to y C . Pl mmer s E liza betha n Ox or d ood Su rve the f W , y of A n ti u ities Ox or d a o Al a n user t q of f M d w, io Al ater ia ls .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parish of Skipton*
    294 HISTORY OF CRAVEN. PARISH OF SKIPTON* HAVE reserved for this parish, the most interesting part of my subject, a place in Wharfdale, in order to deduce the honour and fee of Skipton from Bolton, to which it originally belonged. In the later Saxon times Bodeltone, or Botltunef (the town of the principal mansion), was the property of Earl Edwin, whose large possessions in the North were among the last estates in the kingdom which, after the Conquest, were permitted to remain in the hands of their former owners. This nobleman was son of Leofwine, and brother of Leofric, Earls of Mercia.J It is somewhat remarkable that after the forfeiture the posterity of this family, in the second generation, became possessed of these estates again by the marriage of William de Meschines with Cecilia de Romille. This will be proved by the following table:— •——————————;——————————iLeofwine Earl of Mercia§=j=......... Leofric §=Godiva Norman. Edwin, the Edwinus Comes of Ermenilda=Ricardus de Abrineis cognom. Domesday. Goz. I———— Matilda=.. —————— I Ranulph de Meschines, Earl of Chester, William de Meschines=Cecilia, daughter and heir of Robert Romille, ob. 1129. Lord of Skipton. But it was before the Domesday Survey that this nobleman had incurred the forfeiture; and his lands in Craven are accordingly surveyed under the head of TERRA REGIS. All these, consisting of LXXVII carucates, lay waste, having never recovered from the Danish ravages. Of these-— [* The parish is situated partly in the wapontake of Staincliffe and partly in Claro, and comprises the townships of Skipton, Barden, Beamsley, Bolton Abbey, Draughton, Embsay-with-Eastby, Haltoneast-with-Bolton, and Hazlewood- with-Storithes ; and contains an area of 24,7893.
    [Show full text]
  • James Sands of Block Island
    HERALDIC DESCRIPTION ARMS: Or, a fesse dancettee between three cross-crosslets fitchee gules. CREST: A griffin segreant per fesse or and gules. MoITo: Probum non poenitet. DESCENDANTS OF JAMES SANDS OF BLOCK ISLAND With notes on the WALKER, HUTCHINSON, RAY, GUTHRIE, PALGRAVE, CORNELL, AYSCOUGH, MIDDAGH, HOLT, AND HENSHAW FAMILIES Compiled by MALCOLM SANDS WILSON Privately Printed New York • 1949 Copyright 1949 by Malcolm Sands Wilson 770 Park Avenue, New York 21, N. Y. All rights reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The William Byrd Press, Inc., Richmond, Virginia Foreword The purpose of this Genealogy of the Sands Family, which is the result of much research, is to put on record a more comprehensive account than any so far published in this country. The "Descent of Comfort Sands & of his Children," by Temple Prime, New York, 1886; and "The Direct Forefathers and All the Descendants of Richardson Sands, etc.," by Benjamin Aymar Sands, New York, 1916, (from both of which volumes I have obtained material) are excellent as far as they go, but their scope is very limited, as was the intention of their com­ pilers. I have not attempted to undertake a full and complete genealogy of this family, but have endeavored to fill certain lines and bring more nearly to date the data collected by the late Fanning C. T. Beck and the late LeBaron Willard, (brother-in-law of my aunt Caroline Sands Willard). I take this opportunity to express my thanks to all members of the family who have rendered cheerful and cooperative assistance. It had been my intention to have a Part II in this volume, in which the English Family of Sands, Sandes, Sandis or Sandys were to have been treated, and where the connecting link between James Sands of Block Island and his English forebears was to be made clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Convocations Called by Edward IV and Richard of Gloucester in 1483: Did They Ever Take Place?
    Convocations Called by Edward IV and Richard of Gloucester in 1483: Did They Ever Take Place? ANNETTE CARSON IN I 4 8 3 , THE YEAR OF THREE KINGS, a series of dramatic regime changes led to unforeseen disruptions in the normal machinery of English government. It was a year of many plans unfulfilled, beginning with those of Edward IV who was still concerned over unfinished hostilities with James III of Scotland, and had also made clear his intention to wreak revenge on the treacherous Louis XI of France. All this came to naught when Edward's life ended suddenly and unexpectedly on 9 April. His twelve-year-old son, Edward V, was scheduled to be crowned as his successor, with Edward IV's last living brother Richard, Duke of Gloucester, appointed as lord protector. But within two months Richard had become king in his place, with young Edward deposed on the grounds that his father's marriage to Queen Elizabeth Woodville was both bigamous and secret, thus rendering their children illegitimate. Since this article will be looking closely at the events of this brief period, perhaps it will be useful to start with a very simplified chronology of early 1483. The ques- tions addressed concern two convocations, called by royal mandate in February and May respectively, about which some erroneous assumptions will be revealed.' January/February Edward IV's parliament. 3 February A convocation of the southern clergy is called by writ of Edward IV. 9 April Edward IV dies. 17-19 April Edward's funeral takes place, attended by leading clergy.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnwell Priory 1
    20 OCTOBER 2014 BARNWELL PRIORY 1 Release date Version notes Who Current version: H1-Barnwell-2014-1 20/10/14 Original version RS, NK Previous versions: ———— This text is made available through the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License; additional terms may apply Authors for attribution statement: Charters of William II and Henry I Project Richard Sharpe, Faculty of History, University of Oxford Nicholas Karn, University of Southampton BARNWELL PRIORY Augustinian Priory of St Giles & St Andrew County of Cambridge : Diocese of Ely Founded 1092 in St Giles’s church, Cambridge; moved to Barnwell 1112 Augustinian canons were first brought to Cambridge under the auspices of Picot, sheriff of Cambridge, and his wife Hugolina, in fulfilment of a vow that Hugolina had made when ill (Liber memorandorum, I 3 p. 38). Their foundation was made in the church of St Giles, close to Picot’s base in Cambridge castle and across the river from most of the developing town. According to the Barnwell chronicle, this foundation for six canons was made with the assistance and assent of both Remigius, bishop of Lincoln (died 8 May 1092), and Anselm, archbishop of Canterbury (nominated March 1093) (Liber memorandorum, I 4 p. 39). The date is given as 1092 (ib. I 18 p. 46). Anselm’s involvement was perhaps an enhancement by the chronicler. At the death soon afterwards of Picot and Hugolina, this inchoate establishment fell into the care of their son Robert, who was disgraced for plotting against King Henry; his forfeit possessions were given by the king to Pain Peverel (ib.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Durham Research Online Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 23 June 2020 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Brooks, Mary M. and O'Connor, Sonia and Caple, Christopher and Graves, C. Pamela and Quye, Anita (2020) 'Fragments of Faith : unpicking Archbishop John Morton's vestments.', Antiquaries journal. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000358152000027X Publisher's copyright statement: This article has been published in a revised form in the Antiquaries journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000358152000027X. This version is published under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND. No commercial re-distribution or re-use allowed. Derivative works cannot be distributed. c The Society of Antiquaries of London 2020. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 http://dro.dur.ac.uk FRAGMENTS OF FAITH: UNPICKING ARCHBISHOP JOHN MORTON’S VESTMENTS Mary M Brooks FSA (London) and Sonia O’Connor FSA (London) with contributions from Christopher Caple FSA (London), C.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter HIB Autumn 2020
    BEDFORDSHIRE LOCAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION HISTORY IN BEDFORDSHIRE VOLUME 9, NO 1, AUTUMN 2020 The Association’s 27th Year www.bedfordshire-lha.org.uk Contents Articles: Sister Fanny (1836–1907): Pioneer Church of England deaconess in Bedford: STUART ANTROBUS ~ page 2 The Lancastria tragedy and Private Ronald Charles Pates: LINDA S AYRES ~ page 16 Notes from the Beds Mercury: Wild Life ~ page 20 Peter Gilman, artist: TED MARTIN ~ page 21 Society Bookshelf ~ page 23 History in Bedfordshire is published by the BEDFORDSHIRE LOCAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION www.bedfordshire-lha.org.uk For HIB: Editor: Ted Martin, 2A The Leys, Langford, Beds SG18 9RS Telephone: 01462 701096. E-mail: [email protected] For BLHA: Secretary: Clive Makin, 32 Grange Road, Barton Le Clay, Bedford MK45 4RE: Telephone: 01582 655785 Contributions are very welcome and needed: please telephone or e-mail the Editor before sending any material. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2020 BLHA Bedfordshire Local History Association and contributors. ISSN 0968–9761 1 Sister Fanny (1836–1907) Pioneer Church of England deaconess in Bedford* Fanny Elizabeth Eagles was born in Bedford on 10 December 1836 at the family home in Harpur Place1 the youngest of three children. Her father was Ezra Eagles (1803–1865),2 solicitor, Coroner and Clerk of the Peace for the County, and his wife, Elizabeth Halfhead (1804–1866).3 Such was Fanny’s delicate state of health as an infant, she was baptised privately, and afterwards ‘received into the church’ at St Peter’s. Fanny received her first communion at her confirmation in 1852 at Holy Trinity Church, Bedford.4 She is said to have played the organ there.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, W-Z Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) W WAACs 36:318; 48:12 photo of 36:401 WAAFs 36:318 Wabash Cattle Company 33:35, 38 Wachholtz, Florence, book edited by, reviewed 18:381-82 Waco Tap 38:136 Wacos (airplanes) 15:334, 380 Waddell, Jack O., book coedited by, reviewed 22:273-74 Waddle, Billy 42:36, 38 Wade, Abner, photo of 28:297 property of 28:284, 286, 288, 294 Wade, Benjamin F. 19:202; 41:267, 274, 279, 280, 281, 282, 284 photo of 41:268 Wade, George A. 22:24 Wade Hampton Mine 23:249-50 Wade, James F. 14:136; 29:170 Wade, John Franklin IV(1)6 Wade, Michael S., book by, listed 24:297 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, W-Z Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 Wade, Nicholas 31:365, 397 n. 34 Wade, William 43:282 Wadleigh, Atherton B. 20:35-36, 56, 58-59 portrait 20:57 Wadsworth, B. C. 27:443 Wadsworth, Craig 41:328 Wadsworth mine 34:151 Wadsworth mining claim 34:122, 123 Wadsworth, Mr. See Wordsworth, William C. Wadsworth, Nevada 54:389 Wadsworth, William R. V(4)2 Wadsworth, William W. 23:21, 23 Waffle, Edison D. 7:20 n. 26 Wager, Evelyn 39:234 n. 1, 234 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Thomas More
    THOMAS MORE 1475-1535 Thomas More is one of the most universally admired personages of the English Renaissance. He is probably best known as the author of Utopia (1516) a witty description of a land where contemporary material values are reversed. More was a legal scholar, diplomat, government official and humanist author. In the circle of saints depicted in the chapel, he is the rare image of the Christian parent. More's rise to fame and wealth was steady. His father was a member of the legal profession, and he arranged for Thomas to be appointed page in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury. Morton had been instrumental in the deposition of Richard III and the elevation of Henry VII, who subsequently rewarded him by appointing him Chancellor. Thus Thomas was early initiated into royal politics as well as exposed to some of the finest legal minds of his day. He began his formal education at Canterbury College, Oxford, but soon moved to legal studies in London. At this time he demonstrated what would be characteristic of his career and his life: a deep spirituality that led him to reside for four years with the Carthusian monks in London's Charterhouse. Monastic life would not be his life's role, however, and in 1504 he married Jane Colt, who bore him four children before her death seven years later. His marriage shortly afterward to the widow Alice Middleton provided his children with a much-needed step•mother. During these early years, More emerged as the leader of a group of humanists who would leave a profound mark on the world of letters and educational reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 55, No. 4, October 2004. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 654 DOI: 10.1017/S0022046904001502 Printed in the United Kingdom Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England by PETER SHERLOCK The Reformation simultaneously transformed the identity and role of bishops in the Church of England, and the function of monuments to the dead. This article considers the extent to which tombs of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century bishops represented a set of episcopal ideals distinct from those conveyed by the monuments of earlier bishops on the one hand and contemporary laity and clergy on the other. It argues that in death bishops were increasingly undifferentiated from other groups such as the gentry in the dress, posture, location and inscriptions of their monuments. As a result of the inherent tension between tradition and reform which surrounded both bishops and tombs, episcopal monuments were unsuccessful as a means of enhancing the status or preserving the memory and teachings of their subjects in the wake of the Reformation. etween 1400 and 1700, some 466 bishops held office in England and Wales, for anything from a few months to several decades.1 The B majority died peacefully in their beds, some fading into relative obscurity. Others, such as Richard Scrope, Thomas Cranmer and William Laud, were executed for treason or burned for heresy in one reign yet became revered as saints, heroes or martyrs in another. Throughout these three centuries bishops played key roles in the politics of both Church and PRO=Public Record Office; TNA=The National Archives I would like to thank Craig D’Alton, Felicity Heal, Clive Holmes, Ralph Houlbrooke, Judith Maltby, Keith Thomas and the anonymous reader for this JOURNAL for their comments on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Anointed Queen of England. but Alas! on Second Thoughts These Words Must Mean St Thomas Becket.102 Immediately After the Battle of Bosworth, Aug
    FROM GRAY 3 MARCH 1754 79 anointed Queen of England. But alas! on second thoughts these words must mean St Thomas Becket.102 Immediately after the battle of Bosworth, Aug. 22, 1485, the King sent Sir Robert Willoughby103 to the Castle of Sheriff Hutton in York­ shire with orders to conduct the Princess Elizabeth to her mother104 at London. He himself entered the city five days after;105 was crowned Oct. 30 by Cardinal Thomas Bourchier, Archbishop of Canterbury,106 and married Jan. 18, i486, at Westminster, being then in his 31st year, and Elizabeth turned of 20.107 He (you see) is in his kingly ornaments; but he would not suffer her to be crowned108 till almost two years after, when she had brought him a son.10' If you are sure the person who ac­ companies the King is a cardinal, it must be Bourchier, who died very soon after this marriage, for the writ, de custodia commissa to Jo[hn] Morton, Bishop of Ely,110 who succeeded him, is dated July 13, i486.1" Bourchier was not Legate de latere, but perhaps may bear the Legatine double cross, as Archbishop of Canterbury, for both our archbishops were styled Apostolicce Sedis Legati (see Rymer, vol. xii, pp. 208 and 245); but I take the person there represented to be James, Bishop of Imola,112 who granted the dispensation for this marriage (they being in the fourth degree of consanguinity"3 to one another), and was then orator et commissarius cum potestate Legati de latere in regnis Anglice 102.
    [Show full text]