DOCSLIB.ORG

Peacemaker: Impact Guide for Players

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peacemaker: Impact Guide for Players PeaceMaker: Impact Guide For Players PeaceMaker is a political simulation game from ImpactGames in which players take on the role of either the Israeli Prime Minister or the Palestinian President and attempt to create peace between the two countries. Choosing to play as either Israel or Palestine directs a player to acknowledge the needs of both sides, though players are able to focus primarily on the country of their choosing, learning their motives and needs in depth. Beyond managing pressing political issues, players are tasked with listening to the needs of their people, exploring different social, economic, and cultural concerns both unique and shared between the two countries. Beginning as a student project in 2005, PeaceMaker grew to become one of the most important serious games created to date. Described as a “video game to teach peace” by its creators, the game has gone on to receive high praise for its gameplay and immersive educational simulation. Notably, PeaceMaker received the 2007 award for Best Transformation Game at the Games for Change annual contest, along with placing as a finalist in both the Serious Games Showcase as well as Ashoka’s Entrepreneuring Peace contest. Theme: Citizenship and Leadership PeaceMaker is, at its core, a political simulation game, placing the player in the position of a world leader in near complete control of the country of their choosing. Players must consider not only the needs of their own country, but the needs of the opposing country as they strive to create peace found in a two-nation state. At the same time, the player is given constant updates of their progress through opinion meters, reflecting the opinion of their leadership through their people, those of the opposing country, and the world, as well as political and militant groups, the United States, the United Nations, and the Arab world. Polls, too, allow the player to view the way that their actions in relation to security, leadership and authority, and cooperation, among others, are viewed on a scale of green for positive and red for negative. Game • Disregarding the optional tutorial level, the game does not offer any hints for what players must do when they begin a new game. Why do you think that is? How does that affect the game as a whole? • What actions are the easiest to accomplish early in the game? What are the most difficult? How does that change as the game progresses? What becomes easier and what becomes more difficult? • In what ways do the actions available to you as a player mimic the sort of concerns that world leaders face every day? Were they authentic? • Which difficulty level best represented your opinion of the current state of affairs between the two countries? Which one was the most fun or the most challenging? • In what ways could you engage in the political process? Did you have complete power? Were there checks on your actions? Player • What did being a leader mean to you? What actions were most important to you? • How closely did your actions supplement your own desires as a leader? Were you influenced by the polls, public opinion, advisers, and/or your opposing leader? How did they affect your decisions, if at all? • What type of policy did you adopt as a world leader? Did the game environment or chosen difficulty affect it in any way? • How closely do you feel the game depicted your idea of a position of leadership? Do you feel your experience was authentic? If you could improve the experience, what would you change to make it more realistic? • What decisions were the most difficult to make? Did you face any ethical dilemmas while playing this game? What were they? World • What sort of issues and concerns must world leaders work with every day? • How are leaders influenced by their people? By other governments? By the United Nations? By political organizations? • What difficulties or obstacles do world leaders face when creating new policies and instituting new legislation? • What is the importance of public opinion? Theme: Cultural Clashes and Peace PeaceMaker confines its focus to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict specifically, offering a unique play experience from both sides. Though the goal of the game remains the same despite the nation played as, each country has specific concerns and challenges to overcome. Israel must contend with its citizens’ desire to suppress Palestinians, while they are likewise judged on their sympathy for the opposing nation. Palestine, in contrast, must focus on the state of its economy as well as its citizens’ desire for independence. The game serves to inform and educate about the nature of the conflict as well as the needs and desires of the cultures, while promoting peaceful action and reaction to create the two- nation state. Game • What concerns are shared between the Palestinians and this Israelis? What concerns are unique? • What actions caused violent response? What actions caused peaceful response? • In what ways did concerns of both countries complement one another? How were they solved? • How does the game end peacefully? How does the game end violently? Player • Did you choose to play as Israel or Palestine? Did previous experience or knowledge affect your decision? • What does peace mean to you? Were you happy with the ending creation of the two-nation state? Would you suggest a different ending? • How did you react to the violent responses? Peaceful responses? How did they affect the choices you made on your next turn? • What did you learn about the Israeli culture? What did you learn about the Palestinian culture? Did the game help you understand the reasons for their conflict? • What strategy worked best for creating peace? What didn’t work as well? World • What is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict all about? Why does it continue to this day? • What do you know about the countries themselves? Do you support one side over the other? Why? Did the game change your opinion? • Based on what you have learned, what sort of policies help create peace? Is it easy to achieve peace? Theme: Real Time Strategy and Playing the News PeaceMaker’s game mechanic is that of a real time strategy game, in which the game responds to players with every decision they make. As a player makes administrative decisions as a leader, they are able to immediately see the affects their choices have in the space. PeaceMaker, notably, has a unique way of responding to actions; after an action is made, sometimes players will be prompted to view a Playing the News segment, where real footage of unrest in Israel and Palestine is shown, bringing real- world ties into the game space and establishing the importance of the need for peace. Game • What is a real time strategy (RTS) game? What elements of this game make it an RTS? • What function did the Playing the News segments serve in the game? How often did they appear? • How was time oriented in the game? How did time affect the actions that could be taken on any given turn? Player • How did you react to the clips shown in the Playing the News segments? Did they affect the way you continued to play the game? Why or why not? • How did you manage time? Did it help or hinder your desired policy choices? • In what ways did the RTS format help make the game more or less interesting? If you could alter the way the game was presented, what would you change and why? World • Where in real life are segments like Playing the News found and used? What purpose does it serve? • In what ways does time affect the political process? Can major changes come in a week? .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace
    Istituto Affari Internazionali IAI WORKING PAPERS 12 | 16 – May 2012 Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace Andrea Dessì Abstract While spared from internal turmoil, Israel and the Palestinian Territories have nonetheless been affected by the region’s political transformation brought about by the Arab Spring. Reflecting what can be described as Israel’s “bunker” mentality, the Israeli government has characterized the Arab revolutionary wave as a security challenge, notably given its concern about the rise of Islamist forces. Prime Minister Netanyahu has capitalized on this sense of insecurity to justify his government’s lack of significant action when it comes to the peace process. On the Palestinian side, both Hamas and Fatah have lost long-standing regional backers in Egypt and Syria and have had to contend with their increasingly shaky popular legitimacy. This has spurred renewed efforts for reconciliation, which however have so far produced no significant results. Against this backdrop, the chances for a resumption of serious Israeli-Palestinian peace talks appear increasingly dim. An effort by the international community is needed to break the current deadlock and establish an atmosphere more conducive for talks. In this context, the EU carries special responsibility as the only external actor that still enjoys some credibility as a balanced mediator between the sides. Keywords : Israel / Israeli foreign policy / Arab revolts / Egypt / Muslim Brotherhood / Palestine / Gaza / Hamas / Fatah / Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations / European Union © 2012 IAI IAI Working Papers 1216 Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace Israel and the Palestinians After the Arab Spring: No Time for Peace by Andrea Dessì ∗ Introduction The outbreak of popular protests throughout the Middle East and North Africa in early 2011 came as a shock to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between Fatah and Hamas
    Agreement between Fatah and Hamas Cairo, 3 May 2011 Under the auspices of Egypt, delegations from the Fatah and Hamas movements met in Cairo on April 27, 2011 to discuss the issues concerning ending the political division and the achievement of national unity. On top of the issues were some reservations related to the Palestinian National Unity Accord made in 2009. Both political parties mutually agreed that the basis of understanding made during the meeting are committing to both parties in the implementation of the Palestinian National Reconciliation Agreement. The basis of understanding agreed upon by Fatah and Hamas are as follows: 1. Elections A. Election Committee: Both Fatah and Hamas agree to identify the names of the members of the Central Election Commission in agreement with the Palestinian factions. This list will then be submitted to the Palestinian President who will issue a decree of the reformation of the committee. B. Electoral Court: Both Fatah and Hamas agree on the nomination of no more than twelve judges to be members of the Electoral Court. This list will then be submitted to the Palestinian President in order to take the necessary legal actions to form the Electoral Court in agreement with the Palestinian factions. C. Timing of Elections: The Legislative, Presidential, and the Palestinian National Council elections will be conducted at the same time exactly one year after the signing of the Palestinian National Reconciliation Agreement. 2. Palestine Liberation Organization The political parties of both Fatah and Hamas agree that the tasks and decisions of the provisional interim leadership cannot be hindered or obstructed, but in a manner that is not conflicting with the authorities of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS General Assembly Security Council
    UNITED NATIONS AS General Assembly Distr. Security Council GENERAL A/51/889 S/1997/357 5 May 1997 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH GENERAL ASSEMBLY SECURITY COUNCIL Fifty-first session Fifty-second year Agenda item 10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL ON THE WORK OF THE ORGANIZATION Letter dated 27 December 1995 from the Permanent Representatives of the Russian Federation and the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General As co-sponsors of the peace process launched at Madrid in October 1991, and witnesses to the signing at Washington, D.C., on 28 September 1995, of the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, by the Government of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, we have the honour to enclose the above document (see annex). We would be grateful if you would have the present letter and its attachment circulated as an official document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 10, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Madeleine K. ALBRIGHT (Signed) Sergey V. LAVROV Ambassador Ambassador Permanent Representative Permanent Representative of the United States of of the Russian Federation America to the United Nations to the United Nations 230797 /... A/51/889 S/1997/357 English Page 2 Letter dated 28 December 1995 from the Permanent Representative of Israel to the United Hations addressed to the Secretary-General I have the honour to enclose the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, signed at Washington, D.C., on 28 September 1995, by the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization and witnessed by the United States of America, the Russian Federation, Egypt, Jordan, Norway and the European Union (see annex).
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Perspective on Impact of Video Games on Players: Insights from a Systematic Review of Recent Literature
    EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES: THEORY & PRACTICE eISSN: 2148-7561, ISSN: 2630-5984 Received: 28 November 2019 Revision received: 16 December 2019 Copyright © 2020 JESTP Accepted: 20 January 2020 www.jestp.com DOI 10.12738/jestp.2020.1.004 ⬧ January 2020 ⬧ 20(1) ⬧ 40-58 Review article Intercultural Perspective on Impact of Video Games on Players: Insights from a Systematic Review of Recent Literature Elena Shliakhovchuk Adolfo Muñoz García Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain Abstract The video-game industry has become a significant force in the business and entertainment world. Video games have become so widespread and pervasive that they are now considered a part of the mass media, a common method of storytelling and representation. Despite the massive popularity of video games, their increasing variety, and the diversification of the player base, until very recently little attention was devoted to understanding how playing video games affects the way people think and collaborate across cultures. This paper examines the recent literature regarding the impact of video games on players from an intercultural perspective. Sixty-two studies are identified whose aim is to analyze behavioral-change, content understanding, knowledge acquisition, and perceptional impacts. Their findings suggest that video games have the potential to help to acquire cultural knowledge and develop intercultural literacy, socio-cultural literacy, cultural awareness, self-awareness, and the cultural understanding of different geopolitical spaces, to reinforce or weaken stereotypes, and to some extent also facilitate the development of intercultural skills. The paper provides valuable insights to the scholars, teachers, and practitioners of cultural studies, education, social studies, as well as to the researchers, pointing out areas for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribute to a Peacemaker: Our Friend Tom
    TRIBUTE TO A About the Wider Quaker Fellowship PEACEMAKER: The Wider Quaker Fellowship program of Friends World Committee for Consultation is a ministry of literature. Through our mailings of readings, OUR FRIEND TOM FOX we seek to lift up voices of Friends of different countries, languages and LORENCE ULLERTON Quaker traditions, and invite all to enter into spiritual community with F F Friends. (BALTIMORE YEARLY MEETING The Fellowship was founded in 1936 by Rufus M. Jones, a North American Quaker teacher, activist and mystic, as a way for like-minded people who were interested in Quaker beliefs and practices to stay in contact with the Religious Society of Friends, while maintaining their own religious WAITINGINTHE affiliation, if any. Today, WQF Fellows number approximately 2,700, in nearly 100 countries, and include non-Friends, inquirers, Quakers living in isolated circumstances, and even active members and attenders of Friends LIGHT.BLOGSPOT.COM meetings and churches. The Fellowship does not charge a subscription fee, but depends on donations from its readers and other supporters to cover costs. SELECTED ENTRIES FROM Printed 2006, by the TOM FOX’S BLOG WIDER QUAKER FELLOWSHIP a program of Friends World Committee for Consultation, Section of the Americas 1506 Race Street Philadelphia, PA 19102-1498 P USA Tel: 215-241-7293 P Fax: 215-241-7285 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.fwccamericas.org/about_us/programs/wqf.shtml AA/2800/05‐06 16 1 Acknowledgements Cover Photo: Tom Fox (on lower right) with Palestinian refugees on the Iraq/Syria border in October 2005. Courtesy of Christian Peacemaker Teams.
    [Show full text]
  • From Wargaming to Peacegaming: Digital Simulations with Peacekeeper Roles Needed A
    INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING 2020, VOL. 27, NO. 2, 289–310 https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2020.1721287 From Wargaming to Peacegaming: Digital Simulations with Peacekeeper Roles Needed A. Walter Dorna, Stewart Webbb and Sylvain Pâquetc aRoyal Military College and the Canadian Forces College, Toronto, Canada; bDefence Report, Salt Spring Island, Canada; cCanada Border Services Agency, Ottawa, Canada ABSTRACT Militaries around the world have benefited from computerized games. Many recruits have been attracted to the military through military-style video games. After recruitment, games and simulations provide an important means of soldier training, including before actual deployments. However, electronic games are lacking for UN peace operations. The multidimensionality of peacekeeping has yet to be simulated in serious games to complement the many games that too often depict a binary battlefield of blue-team versus red-team (or, often in public games, good versus evil). Not only could soldiers benefit from nuanced and ambitious peace-related games, so too could civilian peacekeepers, and the public at large. Peacekeeping gaming should not be merely at the tactical level; the operational and strategic levels can be gamed as well. The decision-making in future peacekeeping simulations could help instruct conflict-resolution and critical thinking skills. The paper posits that such digital games could be an important tool for current and future peacekeepers, both military and civilian. Commercial games could also help educate the public on UN peacekeeping. The paper suggests that the United Nations partner with some member states and perhaps the video game industry to provide in-depth training simulations that mirror the challenges and complexities of modern peace operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Classroom Can Be All Fun & Games
    The Classroom Can Be All Fun & Games KATHLEEN GOODRICH* & ANDREA KUPFER SCHNEIDER" I. INTRODUCTION This essay will explain how a particular videogame, PeaceMaker,can be used in dispute resolution classes. In January 2007, ImpactGames introduced PeaceMaker, a video game simulation about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in which the participants take on the role of either the Israeli Prime Minister or the Palestinian President. The participant/politician then "plays the computer" as events unfold, facing decisions about how to move the peace process forward. A "win" achieves peace in the Middle East and the Nobel Peace Prize. Conversely, a "loss" results in being voted out of office or even triggering a Third Intifada.1 This simulation is a teaching mechanism that allows students to gain hands-on experience in applying several dispute resolution concepts as they work toward achieving peace and winning the game. PeaceMaker serves as a model for understanding international conflict by illustrating the interdependency among nations and the influence of various options as well as absent parties on a peaceful solution. This videogame is unique because it demonstrates the broad impact a single decision can have on multiple and sometimes divergent groups within a conflict, and how each group's various * Kathleen Goodrich, associate attorney at Previant, Goldberg, Uelmen, Gratz, Miller & Brueggeman, S.C.; Marquette University, J.D. (2008). ** Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Professor of Law, Marquette University Law School. We have received helpful comments from many sources. Thanks first to our students at Marquette University Law School and the University of Nevada-Las Vegas Boyd School of Law for their participation and feedback in classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Jordan
    Volume 2042, 1-35325 [ENGLISH TEXT - TEXTE ANGLAIS] TREATY OF PEACE BETWEEN THE STATE OF ISRAEL AND THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN PREAMBLE The Government of the State of Israel and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Bearing in mind the Washington Declaration, signed by them on 25th July,1994, and which they are both committed to honour; Aiming at the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East based on Security Council resolutions 242 and 338 in all their aspects; Bearing in mind the importance of maintaining and strengthening peace based on free- dom, equality, justice and respect for fundamental human rights, thereby overcoming psy- chological barriers and promoting human dignity; Reaffirming their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Na- tions and recognising their right and obligation to live in peace with each other as well as with all states, within secure and recognised boundaries; Desiring to develop friendly relations and co-operation between them in accordance with the principles of international law governing international relations in time of peace; Desiring as well to ensure lasting security for both their States and in particular to avoid threats and the use of force between them; Bearing in mind that in their Washington Declaration of 25th July, 1994, they declared the termination of the state of belligerency between them; Deciding to establish peace between them in accordance with this Treaty of Peace; Have agreed as follows: Article 1. Establishment of Peace Peace is hereby established between the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (the "Parties") effective from the exchange of the instruments of ratification of this Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacekeepers: Will They Advance Any Prospective Arab-Israeli Peace Agreement?
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 34, Issue 1 2010 Article 1 TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL PHILIP D. REED MEMORIAL ISSUE Peacekeepers: Will They Advance Any Prospective Arab-Israeli Peace Agreement? Justus Reid Weiner∗ Avinoam Sharony Michelle Morrisonz ∗ y z Copyright c 2010 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Peacekeepers: Will They Advance Any Prospective Arab-Israeli Peace Agreement? Justus Reid Weiner, Avinoam Sharon, and Michelle Morrison Abstract The establishment of a peacekeeping force is widely accepted to be an essential part of any future Israeli-Palestinian peace accord. The final status settlement proposed by the Clinton Admin- istration specified “[s]security arrangements that would be built around an international presence.” However, while the need for a peacekeeping force appears to enjoy broad support, it should be noted that the ”Road Map” proposed by the European Union, Russia, the United Nations, and the United States (together ”the Quartet”) in 2003 does not suggest the inclusion of peacekeeping forces, although it does envisage a monitoring mechanism for its interim phases. The authors set out to examine, from an Israeli perspective, the feasibility of establishing a form of multinational peacekeeping force as part of a future Israeli-Palestinian peace accord. Part I of this Article as- sesses past successes and failures of peacekeeping missions in and around Israel. Part II discusses the reasons for the success and failure of those past peacekeeping missions. Part III identifies best and worst case scenarios when implementing peacekeeping missions. The Article concludes by suggesting that bilateral security cooperation with multinational oversight may be a better way of dealing with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict than peacekeeping missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Reconciliation and the Potential of Transitional Justice
    Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper Number 25, March 2019 Palestinian Reconciliation and the Potential of Transitional Justice Mia Swart PALESTINIAN RECONCILIATION AND THE POTENTIAL OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE Mia Swart The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. Copyright © 2019 Brookings Institution THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .................................................................................................1 II. Introduction ..........................................................................................................3 III. Background on the Rift Between Fatah and Hamas ...............................................7 IV. The Concept
    [Show full text]
  • No. 17853 ISRAEL and EGYPT Framework for Peace in the Middle
    No. 17853 ISRAEL and EGYPT Framework for peace in the Middle East agreed at Camp David (with annex). Signed at Washington on 17 Sep tember 1978 Authentic text: English. Registered by Israel on 14 June 1979. l ISRAËL et EGYPTE Accord-cadre pour l'établissement de la paix au Moyen- Orient conclu à Camp David (avec annexe). Signé à Washington le 17 septembre 1978 Texte authentique : anglais. Enregistré par Israël le 14 juin 1979 1 . 1 See also registration effected in the name of Egypt on 15 May 1979 in United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1136, under No. 1-17813 — Voir aussi l'enregistrement effectué au nom de l'Egypte le 15 mai 1979 dans le Recueil des Traités des Nations Unies, vol. 1136, sous le n° 17813. Vol. 1138, 1-17853 40 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1979 A FRAMEWORK 1 FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST AGREED AT CAMP DAVID Muhammad Anwar Al-Sadat, President of the Arab Republic of Egypt, and Menachem Begin, Prime Minister of Israel, met with Jimmy Carter, President of the United States of America, at Camp David from September 5 to Sep tember 17, 1978, and have agreed on the following framework for peace in the Middle East. They invite other parties to the Arab-Israeli conflict to adhere to it. PREAMBLE The search for peace in the Middle East must be guided by the following: —The agreed basis for a peaceful settlement of the conflict between Israel and its neighbors is United Nations Security Council Resolution 242,2 in all its parts.* —After four wars during thirty years, despite intensive human efforts, the Middle East, which is the cradle of civilization and the birthplace of three great reli gions, does not yet enjoy the blessings of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • For a New Approach to the Israeli-Arab Conflict
    FOR A NEW APPROACH TO THE ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT by I. F. Stone Reprinted from the New York Review of Books, August 3, 1967 For a New Approach to the Israeli-Arab Conflict I. F. Stone Holy War "Le conflit israelo-arabe" Les Temps Modernes, Paris, June, 1967, 991 pp., 20f. I. F. Stone STRIPPED OF PROPAGANDA and sentiment, the Palestine problem is, simply, the struggle of two different peoples for the same strip of land. For the Jews, the establishment of Israel was a Return, with all the mystical significance the capital R implies. For the Arabs it was another invasion. This has led to three wars between them in twenty years. Each has been a victory for the Jews. With each victory the size of Israel has grown. So has the number of Arab homeless. Now to find a solution which will satisfy both peoples is like trying to square a circle. In the language of mathematics, the as- pirations of the Jews and the Arabs are incommensurable. Their conflicting ambitions cannot be fitted into the confines of any ethical system which transcends the tribalistic. This is what frus- trates the benevolent outsider, anxious to satisfy both peoples. For two years Jean-Paul Sartre has been trying to draw Israelis and Arabs into a confrontation in a special number of his review, Les Temps Modernes. The third war between them broke out while it was on the press. This long-awaited special issue on Le conflit israelo-arabe is the first confrontation in print of Arab and Israeli intellectuals.
    [Show full text]