Hybridization in Birds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hybridization in Birds The Auk A Quarterly Journalof Ornithology Vol. 115 No. 2 April 1998 The Auk 115(2):281-283, 1998 OVERVIEWS HYBRIDIZATION IN BIRDS FRANK B. GILL • NationalAudubon Society, 700 Broadway,New •brk, New York10003, USA HYBRID.The word itself immediatelyevokes hybrid increasesthe scorefor intragenerichy- the powerful conceptsof novelty,strength, and brids,but it addsto the pile of evidenceof odd sterility. Hybrids symbolize both inferiority hybrid viability. Parkes'Paradox points to is- and superiority. Hybrids violate racial purity sues beyond wood warblers,specifically the and clan identity. Hybrids challengebreeders, widespreadgenomic compatibility and poten- defy taxonomists,and fascinateornithologists. tial for hybridizationamong strikingly differ- Three papersin this issueof TheAuk feature ent birds (Grant and Grant 1992).Retained ge- hybrid birds--testimony to their continued nomiccompatibility permits successful hybrid- centralrole in modernornithology. Novel phe- izationbetween unlikely parents. The ideology notypes,for example,instantly capture our at- thathybridizing species must be closelyrelated tention. Recall Audubon's Cincinnati Warbler is dead. (Helminthophagacincinnatiensis), only recently Why, then, don't birds hybridize more often diagnosedto be a hybrid betweenKentucky than they apparentlydo? Why don't we find Warbler (Oporornisformosus) and Blue-winged "wonder warblers" more often, if intergeneric Warbler (Vermivorapinus; Graves 1988). Recall hybridsare viable?The answerlies in thepow- alsoSutton's Warbler (Dendroica potomac), a tan- ers of avian socialrecognition. Early imprint- talizing hybrid betweenNorthern Parulas(Pa- ing startsa processof socialpreferences that rula americana)and advancingYellow-throated rigorously segregatescoexisting individuals Warblers (Dendroicadominica; Dunn and Gar- into distinct cultural clusters.Assortative pair- rett 1997).Now, TheAuk reportsa new "wonder ing follows,with few mistakes.Projected to its warbler," which SteveLatta and JosephWun- full conclusion,this line of thinking suggests derle found wintering on Puerto Rico. Ken that speciationin birds is as much a cultural Parkesdiagnosed it to be the first known Mag- phenomenonas it is a geneticphenomenon. nolia Warbler (Dendroicamagnolia) x "Myrtle" Beyondnovelties lies continuedinterest in Warbler (D.c. coronata)hybrid (Latta et al. hybridzones. The biologicalspecies concept fo- 1998). cusedattention appropriately on hybrid zones This latestdiscovery adds to the list of odd to evaluate whether certain taxa interbred free- wood-warblerhybrids, the sourceof Parkes' ly or assortatively.Now, hybrid zonesinvite Paradox:"Why are wood warblersin different probesof increasingsophistication into the dy- generamore prone to occasionalhybridization namicsof secondarycontact between divergent than are wood warblers classified in the same taxa. genus?"(Parkes 1978). The Magnolia x Myrtle Field study of hybridizationbetween Lazuli Buntings (Passerinaamoena) and invading In- digoBuntings (P. cyanea) has lagged behind in- E-mail: [email protected] terest in flickers and other well-known Great 281 282 Overviews [Auk, Vol. 115 Plains hybrid zones.In this issueof TheAuk, winged Warblers (Vermivorachrysoptera) after Myron Bakerand MichaelJohnson (1998) start invasionand hybridizationwith Blue-winged to catchup. They report that hybridizingmale Warblers (V pinus) seemsto be driven by fe- Lazuli Buntings and Indigo Buntings show male Blue-wings with their marker mtDNA greater distinction in plumage color than in (Gill 1997),rather than by socialdominance of size characteristics,suggesting differential in- territorial males (Confer and Larkin 1998). trogressionof characters.Data on geneticintro- The papers on hybrids in this issueof The gressionin buntingsremain limited; Bakerand Aukprovide testimony to the progressof orni- Johnson'ssurvey of allozymesproved essen- thology.Contrary to Rohweret al.'s provoca- tially noninformative.Yet, their results lend tive first line, viz. "The predominanceof the bi- modestsupport to previousstudies of North- ologicalspecies concept trivialized the studyof ern Flickers(Colaptes auratus), which alsoshow hybrid zonesduring muchof the lasthalf-cen- steeperclines in plumage charactersthan in tury," we bear witnesshere to maturingorni- othercharacters. Bill Moorehypothesized that thologicalstudies of hybridsthat mirror ma- social preferencesfor parental phenotypes turing theoryand technology.This progressis steepenedthe characterclines and limited the timely. Ongoing transformations of natural width of the hybrid zone (Moore 1995). landscapesguarantee more casesof population The lead contribution in this issue of The Auk expansion,confrontation, and transienthybrid- is an analysisof newly discoveredzones of hy- ization3all of which provide opportunitiesfor bridization between Hermit Warblers (Dendroi- new insights. ca occidentalis)and Townsend's Warblers (D. Thehistory of Blue-wingedWarblers, Golden- townsendi)in the PacificNorthwest. This article wingedWarblers, and theirhybrids offers a con- by Sievert Rohwer and ChristopherWood cludingmetaphor of the constructivelychang- (1998) offerslessons of ornithologicalhistory. ing ornithologicallandscape. The descriptionin Two factors contributed to the belated discov- 1874 of the first Brewster'sWarbler (Helmintho- ery. First was new accessibility to key sites phagaleucobronchialis), and alsoof the first Law- openedby loggingroads that violate remnant rence'sWarbler (Helminthophaga lawrencei), pro- old-growthforests. Second was the disguising vokeda 40-yeardebate whether these "wonder of hybridsby the geneticdominance of theface warblers"were distinctspecies, color morphs, pattern of the Hermit Warbler.Detailed and hybrids,or agevariants. Then followed an eraof creative analysesof plumage differencesand inquiry promptedby interestin the biological age changeswere requiredto separatethe ef- speciesconcept, inquiries that revealedlimited fectsof hybridizationfrom intraspecificvaria- interbreedingwith localextinction and replace- tions. The dramatic differences in facial color ment. The processof replacementdominates pattern controlledby simple Mendelian genetic currentresearch. Now we probethe dynamics of traits reinforce the view that the distinctions of ecologicalcompetition, genetic invasion, and cy- plumageby whichornithologists tend to define tonucleardisequilibria to gain insightsinto ge- speciesmay reflectonly minor geneticchanges. neticand socialarchitectures. Only the studyof Parkes'Paradox echoes again backstage. hybridzones affords these research opportuni- More than discoveryof new hybrid zones, ties (Harrison 1993). the confrontation between Hermit and Town- LITERATURE CITED send'swarblers strongly heightens our grow- ing awarenessof dynamic, transient hybrid BAKER,M. C., ANDM. S. JOHNSON.1998. Allozymic zonesthat may drive the extinctionof onespe- and morphometriccomparisons among Indigo ciesand replacementby a competitivesuperior and Lazuli buntingsand their hybrids.Auk 115: (Rhymer and Simberloff 1996). These Pacific 537-542. Northwesthybrid zonesare narrow,apparent- CONFER,J. L., AND J. L. LARKIN. 1998. Behavioral in- ly becauseof (social?)selection against hy- teractionsbetween Golden-wingedand Blue- brids. These hybrid zones also are moving winged warblers.Auk 115:209-214. DUNN, J. L., ANDK. L. GARRETT.1997. A field guide southward, apparently because territorial to the warblers of North America. Houghton Townsend's Warblers are dominant and com- Mifflin, New York. petitively superiorto Hermit Warblers.In con- G•LL,E B. 1997. Local cytonuclearextinction of the trast,the predictablelocal extinction of Golden- Golden-wingedWarbler. Evolution 51:519-525. April 1998] Overviews 283 GRANT,P. R., ANDB. R. GRANT.1992. Hybridization Pooleand F. Gill, Eds.).Academy of Natural Sci- of bird species.Science 256:193-197. ences,Philadelphia, and American Ornitholo- GRAVES,G. R. 1988. Evaluationof Vermivorax Opo- gists'Union, Washington,D.C. rornis hybrid wood-warblers. Wilson Bulletin PARKES,K. C. 1978. Still another parulid interge- 100:285-289. neric hybrid (Mniotilta x Dendroica)and its tax- HARRISON,R. G. (Ed.). 1993. Hybrid zones and the onomic and evolutionaryimplications. Auk 95: evolutionaryprocess. Oxford University Press, 682-690. New York. RHYMER, J. M., AND D. SIMBERLOFF.1996. Extinction LATTA, S.C., K. C. PARKES,AND J. M. WUNDERLE,JR. by hybridizationand introgression.Annual Re- 1998. A new intragenericDendroica hybrid from view of Ecologyand Systematics27:83-109. Hispaniola. Auk 115:533-537. ROHWER,S., AND C. WOOD. 1998. Three hybrid MOORE,W. S. 1995. Northern Flicker (Colaptesaura- zones between Hermit and Townsend's warblers tus).In The birds of North America, no. 166 (A. in Washingtonand Oregon.Auk 115:284-310. .
Recommended publications
  • A Revision of the Mexican Piculus (Picidae) Complex
    THE WILSON BULLETIN A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 90, No. 2 JUNE 1978 PAGES 159-334 WilsonBdl., 90(Z), 1978, pp. 159-181 A REVISION OF THE MEXICAN PZCULUS (PICIDAE) COMPLEX LUIS F. BAPTISTA The neotropical woodpeckers of the genus Piculus are closely related to the flickers (Colaptes) (Short 1972). P icu 1us species range from Mexico to southern Brazil, Paraguay, Peru (Ridgway 1914) and Argentina (Salvin and Godman 1892). Peters (1948) lists 46 taxa (9 species and their sub- species) of which 20 are subspecies of Piculus rubiginosus, the most widely distributed species. The latter ranges from southern Veracruz to the north- western provinces of Jujuy, Salta, and Tucuman in Argentina (Peters 1948). Compared with other picids, this genus is generally poorly represented in museum collections. It is possible that they are not as rare as they seem, but being rather silent and secretive birds and difficult to distinguish from the associated vegetation due to their cryptic green coloration, are easily passed unnoticed by collectors in the field. A difference of opinion exists among taxonomists regarding the status of several of the Mexican forms. Two species complexes are recognized in the Mexican check-list (Miller et al. 1957). The Piculus auricularti complex is reported by these authors as consisting of 2 subspecies: sonoriensis known only from the type series of 3 birds taken at Ranch0 Santa Barbara, Sonora, and the nominate race auricularis recorded as ranging from Sinaloa south to Guerrero. They point out the uncertain status of the form sonorien- sis, stating that additional material is needed to substantiate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Co-Occurrence in Woodpeckers and Nocturnal Cavity-Nesting Owls Within an Idaho Forest
    VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1, ARTICLE 18 Scholer, M. N., M. Leu, and J. R. Belthoff. 2018. Patterns of co-occurrence in woodpeckers and nocturnal cavity-nesting owls within an Idaho forest. Avian Conservation and Ecology 13(1):18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01209-130118 Copyright © 2018 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Research Paper Patterns of co-occurrence in woodpeckers and nocturnal cavity- nesting owls within an Idaho forest Micah N. Scholer 1, Matthias Leu 2 and James R. Belthoff 1 1Department of Biological Sciences and Raptor Research Center, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA, 2Biology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA ABSTRACT. Few studies have examined the patterns of co-occurrence between diurnal birds such as woodpeckers and nocturnal birds such as owls, which they may facilitate. Flammulated Owls (Psiloscops flammeolus) and Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) are nocturnal, secondary cavity-nesting birds that inhabit forests. For nesting and roosting, both species require natural cavities or, more commonly, those that woodpeckers create. Using day and nighttime broadcast surveys (n = 150 locations) in the Rocky Mountain biogeographic region of Idaho, USA, we surveyed for owls and woodpeckers to assess patterns of co-occurrence and evaluated the hypothesis that forest owls and woodpeckers co-occurred more frequently than expected by chance because of the facilitative nature of their biological interaction. We also examined co-occurrence patterns between owl species to understand their possible competitive interactions. Finally, to assess whether co-occurrence patterns arose because of species interactions or selection of similar habitat types, we used canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) to examine habitat associations within this cavity-nesting bird community.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal 2017-C-15 Below)
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2017-C 15 March 2017 No. Page Title 01 02 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra 02 09 Split Brown Creeper (Certhia americana) into two species 03 16 Transfer Violet-bellied Hummingbird from Damophila to Juliamyia 04 18 Elevate Colaptes auratus mexicanoides to species rank 05 23 Split Nashville Warbler (Oreothlypis ruficapilla) into two species 06 26 Adopt new English names for Melozone biarcuata and Melozone cabanisi 07 29 Lump Thayer’s Gull (Larus thayeri) with Iceland Gull (Larus glaucoides) 08 43 Change the spelling of the English names of Le Conte’s Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) and Le Conte’s Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii) 09 46 Add Common Scoter (Melanitta nigra) to the Main List 10 49 Add Blyth’s Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus dumetorum) to the Main List 11 52 Add Chatham Albatross (Thalassarche eremita) to the Main List 12 55 Add Red-legged Honeycreeper (Cyanerpes cyaneus) to the U.S. list 13 57 Add nine species recorded from Greenland to the Main List 14 68 Split Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii) into two species 1 2017-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee pp. 658-679 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra Background: In the past decade, several phylogenetic papers have elucidated relationships within the Fringillidae (Arnaiz-Villena et al. 2007, 2008, Nguembock et al. 2009, Lerner et al. 2011, Zuccon et al. 2012). NACC already has taken a series of actions (reviewed below) based on this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs and Field Trips
    CONTENTS Welcome from Kathy Martin, NAOC-V Conference Chair ………………………….………………..…...…..………………..….…… 2 Conference Organizers & Committees …………………………………………………………………..…...…………..……………….. 3 - 6 NAOC-V General Information ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..………….. 6 - 11 Registration & Information .. Council & Business Meetings ……………………………………….……………………..……….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………..…..……...….. 11 6 Workshops ……………………….………….……...………………………………………………………………………………..………..………... 12 Symposia ………………………………….……...……………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 13 Abstracts – Online login information …………………………..……...………….………………………………………….……..……... 13 Presentation Guidelines for Oral and Poster Presentations …...………...………………………………………...……….…... 14 Instructions for Session Chairs .. 15 Additional Social & Special Events…………… ……………………………..………………….………...………………………...…………………………………………………..…………………………………………………….……….……... 15 Student Travel Awards …………………………………………..………...……………….………………………………..…...………... 18 - 20 Postdoctoral Travel Awardees …………………………………..………...………………………………..……………………….………... 20 Student Presentation Award Information ……………………...………...……………………………………..……………………..... 20 Function Schedule …………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………..…………. 22 – 26 Sunday, 12 August Tuesday, 14 August .. .. .. 22 Wednesday, 15 August– ………………………………...…… ………………………………………… ……………..... Thursday, 16 August ……………………………………….…………..………………………………………………………………… …... 23 Friday, 17 August ………………………………………….…………...………………………………………………………………………..... 24 Saturday,
    [Show full text]
  • Golden-Winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan
    Golden-winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan i Golden-winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan Editors: Amber M. Roth, Ronald W. Rohrbaugh, Tom Will, and David A. Buehler Front cover art by: Ann-Kathrin Wirth. Back cover art by: Reyn Oriji. Chapter 1: Golden-winged Warbler Status Review Chapter 2: Golden-winged Warbler Full Life Cycle Conservation Strategy Chapter 3: Golden-winged Warbler Breeding Season Conservation Plan Chapter 4: Golden-winged Warbler Non- breeding Season Conservation Plan (to be added in the future) Photo by Roger Erikkson. RECOMMENDED CITATION Roth, A.M., R.W. Rohrbaugh, T. Will, and D.A. Buehler, editors. 2012. Golden-winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan. www.gwwa.org/ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Recommended Citation ................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................................ vi Preface ....................................................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1: Golden-winged Warbler Status Review................................................................................1–1 CHAPTER 2: Golden-winged Warbler Full Life Cycle Conservation Strategy............................................2–1 Recommended Citation ............................................................................................................................2–1
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodpeckers and Allies)
    Coexistence, Ecomorphology, and Diversification in the Avian Family Picidae (Woodpeckers and Allies) A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Matthew Dufort IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY F. Keith Barker and Kenneth Kozak October 2015 © Matthew Dufort 2015 Acknowledgements I thank the many people, named and unnamed, who helped to make this possible. Keith Barker and Ken Kozak provided guidance throughout this process, engaged in innumerable conversations during the development and execution of this project, and provided invaluable feedback on this dissertation. My committee members, Jeannine Cavender-Bares and George Weiblen, provided helpful input on my project and feedback on this dissertation. I thank the Barker, Kozak, Jansa, and Zink labs and the Systematics Discussion Group for stimulating discussions that helped to shape the ideas presented here, and for insight on data collection and analytical approaches. Hernán Vázquez-Miranda was a constant source of information on lab techniques and phylogenetic methods, shared unpublished PCR primers and DNA extracts, and shared my enthusiasm for woodpeckers. Laura Garbe assisted with DNA sequencing. A number of organizations provided financial or logistical support without which this dissertation would not have been possible. I received fellowships from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program and the Graduate School Fellowship of the University of Minnesota. Research funding was provided by the Dayton Fund of the Bell Museum of Natural History, the Chapman Fund of the American Museum of Natural History, the Field Museum of Natural History, and the University of Minnesota Council of Graduate Students.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN FLICKER (Colaptes Auratus) Guidance for Conservation
    NORTHERN FLICKER (Colaptes auratus) Guidance for Conservation The Northern Flicker is a common, but declining in open woodlands in the Hudson River Valley. Conservation Status Partners in Flight regards this bird as a Species of Regional Concern in Bird Conservation Regions 13, 28, and 30. Breeding Bird Survey show a moderate decline in populations statewide since 1966. Breeding Bird Atlas data show a slight reduction in its distribution in the Hudson River Valley, but overall remains very common. Identification This medium-large woodpecker is brown overall with barring on the back and wings, off-white underparts with black spots, and a black bib. Its underwings and undertail are yellow. It has a white rump patch that is noticeable when the bird is flying. The male has a black stripe behind the beak. It can be easily identified in flight by a distinctive, undulating flight pattern. Its most-often-heard call is a whinnying sound that somewhat A. Wells resembles laughter. It also gives a call that is often transcribed as “klee-yer.” Habitat Flickers are ground-foraging woodpeckers that nest in tree cavities. It can be found in open deciduous, mixed, and coniferous woodlands, forest edges, riparian woodlands, beaver ponds and other wetlands with standing trees, meadows, parks, as well as urban and suburban areas, and farm woodlots with large trees. It requires cavity nest sites in dead or dying trees along forest edges or in open woodlands. The cavities it excavates can later be used by other hole-nesting birds. Food This species most often forages on the ground by probing and hammering in the soil with its bill, where it eats mainly ants, but also beetle larvae, grasshoppers, and wasps.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Those Ar- Dana L Moseley Ticles Using Packages Tm and Topicmodels in R to Ex- Graham E Derryberry Tract Common Words and Trends
    ABSTRACT BOOK Listed alphabetically by last name of presenting author Oral Presentations . 2 Lightning Talks . 161 Posters . 166 AOS 2018 Meeting 9-14 April 2018 ORAL PRESENTATIONS Combining citizen science with targeted monitoring we argue how the framework allows for effective large- for Gulf of Mexico tidal marsh birds scale inference and integration of multiple monitoring efforts. Scientists and decision-makers are interested Evan M Adams in a range of outcomes at the regional scale, includ- Mark S Woodrey ing estimates of population size and population trend Scott A Rush to answering questions about how management actions Robert J Cooper or ecological questions influence bird populations. The SDM framework supports these inferences in several In 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill affected many ways by: (1) monitoring projects with synergistic ac- marsh birds in the Gulf of Mexico; yet, a lack of prior tivities ranging from using approved standardized pro- monitoring data made assessing impacts to these the tocols, flexible data sharing policies, and leveraging population impacts difficult. As a result, the Gulf of multiple project partners; (2) rigorous data collection Mexico Avian Monitoring Network (GoMAMN) was that make it possible to integrate multiple monitoring established, with one of its objectives being to max- projects; and (3) monitoring efforts that cover multiple imize the value of avian monitoring projects across priorities such that projects designed for status assess- the region. However, large scale assessments of these ment can also be useful for learning or describing re- species are often limited, tidal marsh habitat in this re- sponses to management activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Field Ornithologists the Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly
    Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists The Colorado Field Ornithologists' Quarterly VOL. 33, NO. 1 Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists January 1999 JOURNAL OF THE COLORADO FIELD ORNITHOLOGISTS (USPS 0446-190) (ISSN 1094- 0030) is published quarterly by the Colorado Field Ornithologists, 3410 Heidelberg Drive, Boulder, CO 80303-7016. Subscriptions are obtained through annual membership dues. Periodicals postage paid at Boulder, CO. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Journal of the Colorado Field Ornithologists, P.O. Box 481, Lyons, CO 80540-0481. OFFICERS OF THE COLORADO FIELD ORNITHOLOGISTS: Dates indicate end of current term. An asterisk indicates eligibility for re-election. President: Leon Bright, 636 Henry Ave., Pueblo, CO 81005; 719/561-1108; [email protected]; 1999* Past-President: Linda Vidal, 1305 Snowbunny Ln., Aspen, CO 81611; 970/925-7134; [email protected] Vice-President: William Fink, 1225 Columbia Dr., Longmont, CO 80503; 303/776-7395; 1999* Secretary: Toni Brevillier, 2616 Ashgrove St., Colorado Springs, CO 80906; 719/540-5653; [email protected]; 1999* Treasurer: BB Hahn, 2915 Hodgen Rd., Black Forest, CO 80921 ; 719/495-0647; [email protected]; 1999* Directors: Raymond Davis, Lyons, 303/823-5332, 1999*; Pearle Sandstrom-Smith, Pueblo, 719/ 543-6427, 1999*; Warren Finch, Lakewood, 303/233-3372, 2000* ; Jameson Chace, Boulder, 303/492-6685, 2001 *; Richard Levad, Grand Junction, 970/242-3979, 2001 *; Suzi Plooster, Boulder, 303/494-6708, 2001; Robert Spencer, Golden, 303/279-4682, 2001 *;Mark Yeager, Pueblo, 719/545-8407, 2001 * Journal Staff Cynthia Melcher (Editor), 4200 North Shields, Fort Collins, CO 80524, 970/484- 8373, [email protected]; Beth Dillon (Associate Editor); Mona Hill (Administrative Editoral Assistant); Jameson Chace and Richard Harness (Science Editors).
    [Show full text]
  • The Threatened Helmeted Woodpecker Dryocopus Galeatus Belongs in the Genus Celeus
    Erschienen in: Journal of Ornithology ; 157 (2016), 1. - S. 109-116 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1254-x A striking case of deceptive woodpecker colouration: the threatened Helmeted Woodpecker Dryocopus galeatus belongs in the genus Celeus Martjan Lammertink1,2,3 • Cecilia Kopuchian4,5 • Hanja B. Brandl 6 • Pablo L. Tubaro 5 • Hans Winkler6 Abstract The Helmeted Woodpecker Dryocopus galea- Kaempfer’s Woodpecker C. obrieni , Rufous-headed tus is a threatened species of the Atlantic Forest in south- Woodpecker C. spectabilis , and Cream-coloured Wood- eastern South America. It has traditionally been placed in pecker C. flavus . It has the southernmost distribution range the genus Dryocopus, but it shows similarities in plumage of the woodpeckers in this clade. The Helmeted Wood- and structure with woodpeckers in the genus Celeus. We pecker is sympatric throughout its range with Lineated sequenced mitochondrial and nuclear DNA that was sam- Woodpecker Dryocopus lineatus and Robust Woodpecker pled from live captured Helmeted Woodpeckers. We found Campephilus robustus and these species from three dif- that the Helmeted Woodpecker has a phylogenetic position ferent genera show a remarkable convergence in plumage embedded within the genus Celeus, and recommend its colours and patterns. With the inclusion of Helmeted taxonomic treatment as Celeus galeatus. The Helmeted Woodpecker in Celeus, this genus has four out of 15 spe- Woodpecker belongs to a clade within Celeus that includes cies on the International Union for Conservation of Nature
    [Show full text]