Portland City Council Agenda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Portland City Council Agenda
CITY OF OFFICIAL PORTLAND, OREGON MINUTES A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON WAS HELD THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2007 AT 9:30 A.M. THOSE PRESENT WERE: Mayor Potter, Presiding; Commissioners Adams, Leonard, Saltzman and Sten, 5. OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE: Karla Moore-Love, Clerk of the Council; Ben Walters, Senior Deputy City Attorney; and Ron Willis, Sergeant at Arms. Item 1177 was pulled for discussion and on a Y-5 roll call, the balance of the Consent Agenda was adopted. Disposition: COMMUNICATIONS 1161 Request of Harriet Sheridan to address Council regarding impeachment (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 1162 Request of Virginia L. Ross to address Council regarding impeachment proceedings against G.W. Bush and R. Cheney (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 1163 Request of Grant E. Remington to address Council regarding a resolution to impeach Bush and Cheney (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 1164 Request of Paul Verhoeven to address Council regarding Portland Saturday Market relocation to Waterfront Park (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 1165 Request of Harlan Hiltner to address Council regarding privatization of parking spaces and developers and the infrastructure (Communication) PLACED ON FILE TIME CERTAINS 1166 TIME CERTAIN: 9:30 AM – Authorize Intergovernmental Agreement with the USDA Forest Service Mt. Hood National Forest for protection and PASSED TO stewardship of the Bull Run Watershed Management Unit (Ordinance SECOND READING introduced by Commissioner Leonard) OCTOBER 10, 2007 AT 9:30 AM 1 of 37 October 3, 2007 1167 TIME CERTAIN: 10:00 AM – Accept the Portland Urban Canopy Assessment and Public Tree Evaluation (Report introduced by Commissioner Saltzman) Motion to accept the Report: Moved by Commissioner Adams and ACCEPTED Commissioner Saltzman seconded. -
Prospective Vendor Manual
Portland Saturday Market Prospective Vendor Manual 2014 i Table of Contents Maps ii-iv Site Map, Direction from Administrative Office to Site Frequently Asked Questions A great start to the process, this section answers the most commonly v-vii asked questions, from “How do I get a Booth?” to “How much does it cost?” Background on Portland Saturday Market This section includes general information about our market, information 1-4 for new vendors, and explains the benefits of membership and the services provided for members Information about the Jury Process 5-16 This section includes jury guidelines, information regarding allowable products, product guidelines, and craft booth guidelines PSM Contact Information 17 How to Apply to Portland Saturday Market 18-20 Application Tips and Applications 21-30 Craft, Packaged Food, Plant/Farm Produce and Service Applications ii PSM SITE The Bridge Information Booth 2 SW Naito Parkway, Portland, OR 97209 (503)-241-4188 Hours of Operation Saturday Sunday 6:45 AM Info Booth Opens 8:45 AM 7:35 AM Allocation Begins 9:00 AM The Ramp 10:00 AM PSM Opens 11:00 AM 5:00 PM PSM Closes 4:30 PM 5:30 PM Info Booth Closes 5:00 PM The Plinth Court Food International Ankeny Plaza Waterfront Park – Plinth Waterfront Park – Under Bridge Food Court iii From PSM Administrative Office to PSM Site iv FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS) Can I sell items I haven’t made myself? No. While you may include items you have not made in your booth display, you may not sell, trade or give them away for free. -
Portland Public Market Feasibility Study & Business Plan
Portland Public Market Feasibility Study & Business Plan Portland Public Market Feasibility Study & Business Plan Prepared for: Portland Development Commission Prepared by: Bay Area Economics GBD Architects Project for Public Spaces Shiels Obletz Johnsen February 2006 March 7, 2006 Mr. Ross Plambeck Portland Development Commission 222 NW 5th Avenue Portland, OR 97209 Dear Ross: We are pleased to provide this completed Feasibility Study for the proposed Portland Public Market. The Study addresses both market and financial feasibility, as well as the potential development strategy and business plan for the Market. Recommended next steps are identified. This Study seeks to inform the larger Ankeny / Burnside Strategy effort that is currently underway. The Strategy will address the potential for a larger Market District, with the Public Market as a catalyst anchor use. The work for this Study indicates a substantial potential for a Market District that could serve as an organizing theme for revitalization of the surrounding area. Our work has shown that there is great interest and potential support for the Public Market, but also that there are a number of complex issues to be addressed. The effectiveness of solutions to address start-up risks and other implementation challenges is likely to be the most significant factor in determining whether a Public Market becomes viable and self-sufficient. The work for this Study was reviewed and guided by an Advisory Committee of local residents active in the food industry and related fields. On behalf of our consultant team, we would like to thank the members of the Advisory Committee, PDC staff, and others who provided valuable assistance in the preparation of the Study. -
DATE: February 13, 2008 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Bruce A. Warner, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report Number 08-19 Adopt
DATE: February 13, 2008 TO: Board of Commissioners FROM: Bruce A. Warner, Executive Director SUBJECT: Report Number 08-19 Adopt the Intergovernmental Agreement with Portland Bureau of Parks & Recreation for the Waterfront Park, Ankeny Plaza, and Street Improvements Project, authorize the Executive Director to enter into Public Improvement and other Contracts necessary for completion of the Project, and direct PDC staff to complete the design and cost estimating of Ankeny Plaza and a district lighting strategy, currently unfunded improvements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BOARD ACTION REQUESTED Adopt Resolution No. 6557 ACTION SUMMARY This action will authorize the Executive Director to: 1. Enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Portland Bureau of Parks & Recreation (PP&R) for the design and construction of improvements to Waterfront Park, including Portland Saturday Market’s new home, and improvements to enhance public safety under the Burnside Bridge, including a new active retail space at the MAX Station platform, and lighting, painting and public safety improvements to the parking area between the MAX Station and Naito Parkway (Project), and payment to PP&R in an amount not to exceed One Million Nine Hundred Thirty- Seven Thousand Six Hundred AND NO/100 Dollars ($1,937,600) for services performed as described in the IGA; and 2. Enter into necessary contracts for hard construction and construction soft costs in a total amount not to exceed Six Million Six Hundred Thirty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Seven AND NO/100 Dollars ($6,637,337) for construction of the Project. This project is under an extremely compressed schedule in order to complete improvements to Waterfront Park by March 2009, to accommodate Portland Saturday Market (PSM) for the start of the 2009 market season. -
Chinatown Japantown Ankeny Plaza Skidmore Waterfront
CHINATOWN JAPANTOWN ANKENY PLAZA SKIDMORE WATERFRONT September 20, 2017 To Mayor Ted Wheeler, City of Portland Chair Deborah Kafoury, Multnomah County Marc Jolin, Director, Joint Office of Homeless Services On behalf of the Old Town Chinatown Community Association, we are writing to inform the City of Portland, Multnomah County, and the Joint Office of Homeless Services that based on a community vote after two community meetings held on September 6, 2017, we cannot support your proposal for a low-barrier, 200-bed shelter at NW Hoyt and NW 3rd Avenue. We recognize that there is a housing and homeless crisis in our City; we know that 5.86 per 1,000 residents are experiencing homelessness; we know that Portland housing inventory for the poorest of the poor is less than 10%. We understand these statistics better than most because Old Town Chinatown provides 328+ shelter beds year round (not including transitional housing offered by providers like Blanchet House and Union Gospel Mission), over 1,000 low-income and special needs housing units, and numerous services to support very low-income and homeless people. We have worked as partners with our neighborhood nonprofits and service providers for decades, while simultaneously attempting to preserve our distinct cultural districts and build and sustain retail businesses, offices, tourism, and non-subsidized housing. Public Safety and Putting our Most Vulnerable At Risk As you saw in our presentation during the September 6th meetings, Old Town Chinatown has the highest crime-rate concentration in all of Portland. You also heard the feedback from our residents that they are not just fearful for their lack of safety and security, but are pleading with the City for more support after having a neighbor recently stabbed to death, watching open drug deals on our streets, and the recent drive-by shooting on NW 4th and Everett. -
No Place for Middlemen: Civic Culture, Downtown Environment, and the Carroll Public Market During the Modernization of Portland, Oregon
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 7-3-2013 No Place for Middlemen: Civic Culture, Downtown Environment, and the Carroll Public Market during the Modernization of Portland, Oregon James Richard Louderman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the United States History Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Louderman, James Richard, "No Place for Middlemen: Civic Culture, Downtown Environment, and the Carroll Public Market during the Modernization of Portland, Oregon" (2013). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 1050. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1050 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. No Place for Middlemen: Civic Culture, Downtown Environment, and the Carroll Public Market during the Modernization of Portland, Oregon by James Richard Louderman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Thesis Committee: William Lang, Chair David Horowitz Jennifer Tappan Barbara Brower Portland State University 2013 © 2013 James Richard Louderman Abstract Following the Civil War, the American government greatly expanded the opportunities available for private businessmen and investors in an effort to rapidly colonize the West. This expansion of private commerce led to the second industrial revolution in which railroads and the corporation became the symbols and tools of a rapidly modernizing nation. -
Univ of Oregon in Portland | Richard H
Portland, Oregon West Waterfront Urban Design Proposal | Univ of Oregon in Portland | Richard H. Wilson | www.rhwdesigns.com Pg. 1 1 | Page | ARCH 535 - Implementation | 2014/Jan-Mar Richard H. Wilson - www.rhwdesigns.com Abstract This is an urban design proposal for the Portland, Oregon West Waterfront Blocks bound by SW Yamhill St, SW 3rd Ave, and NW Couch St in Portland, Oregon. The over-arching proposal here is to introduce higher density near the waterfront, and to propose incentives that may help preserve historic buildings. Specifically, the incentives involve added Floor Area Ratios (FAR) to development properties for taking advantage of certain existing site amenities and design guides. Additionally, for preserving historic buildings (or buildings of substantial age and/or cultural/historic value) a transfer of allowable building FAR may take place. As a baseline, the existing FAR allowance within the study area is 4:1, and the height restriction is 75ft. These existing restrictions would still be in place. However with added incentives such as TDRs, the allowable FAR and max height would be given the right to increase. As much as a total of FAR 9:1 may be achieved with the right mix of incentives. The following memorandum will further propose how these steps may be taken, and should be viewed in conjunction with the accompanying Portland, Oregon West Waterfront Urban Design Proposal document. Phasing Immediate Phasing (within 5-years) Allowance for FAR transfer of development rights (TDR) 1. +2 FAR for Stepped Building Façade (façade to match adjacent buildings) 2. +1 FAR for Below-Grade (or concealed) Parking 3. -
Type Selection Evaluation Criteria – UDAWG Version 1 Urban / Site Context and Experience
Multnomah County is creating an earthquake-ready downtown river crossing. BETTER – SAFER – CONNECTED December 16, 2020 Type Selection Evaluation Criteria – UDAWG Version 1 Urban / Site Context and Experience A. On-bridge Experience: How well does the bridge option provide public benefits from its deck surface, including: throughout the extents of the bridge? • Clear views from the bridge deck of: o The cityscape, including downtown and the Eastside o Distant landscapes and natural environment (West Hills, Willamette River, Mt Hood, Mt St Helens, and open skies) o Adjacent bridges in the up-river and down-river directions o Other key viewpoints (e.g., Portland Oregon sign, Oregon Convention Center towers, Moda Center, Waterfront Park, US Bank Tower) • Bridge deck as an open space for public events (such as the Rose Festival Grand Floral Parade) and civic gatherings • Create a gateway and enhanced sense of arrival to and from each side of the river • (Note: Likely common to all options; Not expected to be differentiating) Intuitive ability to understand wayfinding, mode split, location of overlooks and connections without excessive clutter that detracts from the bridge design • (Note: Likely common to all options; Not expected to be differentiating) Pedestrian and bicycle safety: sight lines, noise, vibration, lighting and physical separation of modes • (Note: Likely common to all options; Not expected to be differentiating) Ability to provide river overlooks for users to stop and enjoy the adjacent scenery B. Public Use and Context: How -
Food Systems
Food Systems PORTLAND PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT FALL 2009 Acknowledgments Food Systems Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) PROSPERITY AND BUSINESS SUCCESS Mayor Sam Adams, Commissioner-in-charge Susan Anderson, Director SUSTAINABILITY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Steve Dotterrer, Principal Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner DESIGN, PLANNING AND PUBLIC SPACES Gil Kelley, Former Director, Bureau of Planning Primary Authors NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Amanda Rhoads, City Planner, BPS Heidi Guenin, Community Service Aide, BPS TRANSPORTATION, TECHNOLOGY AND ACCESS Contributors Steve Cohen, Food Policy and Programs Manager, BPS EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT Gary Odenthal, Technical Services Manager, BPS Carmen Piekarski, GIS Analyst, BPS Portland Multnomah Food Policy Council HUMAN HEALTH, FOOD AND PUBLIC SAFETY The Food Policy Council is a citizen-based advisory council to the City of Portland and Multnomah County. The Council brings citizens QUALITY OF LIFE, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND EQUITY and professionals together from the region to address issues regarding food access, land use planning issues, local food purchasing ARTS, CULTURE AND INNOVATION plans and many other policy initiatives in the current regional food system. The Food Policy Council has been in conversation with BPS since 2007 regarding the Portland Plan. Two Council committees, the Land Use Committee and Food Access Committee, provided input to the development of this document in 2008, while the Urban Food Initiative/Portland Plan Committee reviewed -
Skidmore/Old Town Historic District Design Guidelines
SKIDMORE/OLD TOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 18738, MAY 11, 2016 EFFECTIVE JUNE 10, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Portland City Council Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability Document Production and Image Credits Charlie Hales, Mayor Charlie Hales, Mayor, Commissioner in Charge Max Brunke, Karen Karlsson, Rick Michaelson, Mark Nick Fish, Commissioner Susan Anderson, Planning Director Rabiner, Mark Raggett, Jessica Engeman, Carin Carlson Amanda Fritz, Commissioner Joe Zehnder, Principal Planner Consultants Steve Novick, Commissioner Sallie Edmunds, Central City Planning Manager KLK Consulting Dan Saltzman, Commissioner Project Staff Karen Karlsson Principal Portland Historic Landmarks Commission Nicholas Starin, City Planner, Project Manager Rick Michaelson Kirk Ranzetta, Chair Karl Lisle, City Planner, Past Project Manager Max Brunke Paul Solimano, Vice Chair Mark Raggett, City Planner Jessica Engeman Liza Mickle, City Planner Carin Carlson Amber Springberg, Community Service Aide Caroline Dao Krista Gust, Graphic Designer Kristin Minor Additional Agency Assistance In Memoriam Mattew Roman Kara Fioravanti, Bureau of Development Services Art DeMuro Tim Heron, Bureau of Development Services Jeff Joslin, Bureau of Development Services Hillary Adam, Bureau of Development Services Ross Plambeck, Portland Development Commission To help ensure equal access to City programs, services and activities, the City of Portland will provide translation, reasonably modify policies/procedures and provide auxiliary aids/ services/alternative formats to persons with disabilities. For accommodations, translations, complaints, and additional information, contact the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability at 503-823-7700, City TTY 503-823-6868, or use Oregon Relay Service: 711. Cover Image: Aerial Photo of Skidmore/Old Town Historic District Circa 2008 Funding was provided by the Portland Development Commission. -
State of the River 2005 River Renaissance in Action: a Smarter Approach to River Revitalization
State of the River 2005 River Renaissance in Action: A smarter approach to river revitalization The Willamette River shapes Portland’s growth and success, our culture, and our sense of place. It is the historical center of our city and lifeblood of the region’s commerce. River Renaissance is a citywide initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as Portland’s centerpiece. The initiative promotes and celebrates the Willamette River as our chief environmental, economic, and urban asset. Through River Renaissance, Portland is becoming a vibrant and prosperous city centered on a healthy Willamette River. 2005 State of the River Report iver Renaissance is a community-wide initiative to reclaim the Willamette River Ras Portland’s centerpiece. The initiative promotes and celebrates the Willamette River as our chief environmental, economic and Contents urban asset. The State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners working together to revitalize our rivers. Leadership . 2 Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 Accomplishments . 4–5 Introduction . 6 Progress Measures . 7 Action Agenda 2005–2007 . 17 Clean River Education Programs . 18 Columbia Slough Infrastructure Improvements . 27 The River Trust . 18 Harbor Reinvestment Strategy . 27 Urban Forestry Strategy . 19 Portland Harbor Cleanup . 28 Freight Master Plan . 19 River Plan—North Reach . 28 ReThink Training Series . 20 Willamette Industrial Urban Renewal Area . 29 Watershed Management Plan . 20 University of Portland Riverfront Expansion . 29 Green Streets . 21 Waud Bluff Trail . 30 Parks’ Environmental Education & Restoration . 21 Combined Sewer Overflow Project . 30 Green Investment Fund . 22 Centennial Mills Planning . -
Reviving the Public Market
Portland State University PDXScholar Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Winter 2004 Market Forces: Reviving the Public Market Matthew Kauffman Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metropolitianstudies Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Kauffman Smith, Matthew, "Market Forces: Reviving the Public Market" (2004 Metroscape, Institute for Portland Metropolitan Studies, Portland State University) This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Market Forces: Or Hi CN#015185 Meszaros Photograph by Nathan A vendor from an earlier Portland farmers’ market and one circa 2003. Page 20 Metroscape Reviving the public market An Interview with Ron Paul by Matthew Kauffman Smith on Paul worked in the restaurant business for in our efforts was to learn from that effort. Here you R 18 years, including 15 as the owner of Ron had this major civic development and it was so short Paul Charcuterie. Then, as chief of staff in lived that there had to been some fundamental rea- Commissioner Charlie Hales' office in 2000, Paul sons why it went awry. We found several, including assembled a citizens group that began to explore the fact that it was born out of a back room City the feasibility of a public market in the city.