Lok Sabha Debates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Third Series1R.3 Wednesday, February 12, 1964 Magha 23, 1885 (Saka) /2.6$%+$ '(%$7(6 Seventh Session Third/RN6DEKD /2.6$%+$6(&5(7$5,$7 New Delhi CONTENTS NO.3 Wednesday, February 12, 19641Magha 23,1885 (Saka) Oral Answers to Questions- COLUMNS *Starred Questions Nos. 31 to 37 219r-60 Written Answers to Questions- Starred Questions Nos. 38 to 60 260-75 Unstarred Questions Nos. 92 to 127 275--98 Paper laid on the Table 299-300 Committee on Private Members' Bill and Resolutions- Thirty-second Report 300 Estimates Committee- Forty-second Report 300 Statement by Member 300-03 Motion re: communal disturbances in East Pakistan and West Bengal 30 3-435 Shri H. N. Mukerjee ... 306- 28 Shri Surendranath Dwivedy 328-41 Shrimati Renuka Ray 341-47 Shri N. C. Chatterjee 347-56 Shri A. C. Guha 357-63 Shrimati Subhadra Joshi 364-73 Shri P. K. Deo 373-78 Shri C. K. Bhattacharyya 378-84 Shri Bade 384--95 Shri Bakar Ali Mirza 395-400 Shri P. R. Chakraverti 4OO-D6 Shri Tridib Kumar Chaudhuri . 406-14 Shri Abdul Ghani Goni 414-19 Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia 419-33 Shri Nanda 434-35 *The sign+marked above the name ofa Member indicateS that the Ques- tion was actually asked on the floor of the House by that Member. LO~ SABRA DEBATES 219 220 LOK SABHA Shri Shiv Charan Gupta: Shri Hem Raj: Wednesday, FebruaTY 12, 1964/ Shri Swell: Magha 23, 1885 (Saka) Shri Moban Swamp: Shri K07a: Shri p. R. Patel: The Lok Sabha met at Eleven oJ the Dr. Mahadeva Prasad: Clock Shri Ram Sewak Yadav: Shri Bagri: [MR. SPEAKER in the· ChaiT] Shri Abdul Ghani Goni· ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS l Shri Vidyalankar: . '!'heft of Relic from Hazratbal Mosque Will the Minister of Home Allairll + be pleased to state: r Shri Yashpal Singh: Shri P. C. Borooah: Shri Prakash Vir Shastri: (a) whether investigations have Shri Maheswar Naik: been made in regard to the disappear- ance and subsequent recovery uf the Shri Bishanchander Seth: Shri B. p. Yaelava: sacred relic of the Prophet from the Shri Dhaon: Hazaratbal shrine by the Central In- telligence Department; Shri Visbram Prasad: Shri Bbapat Jba Azad: (b) if so, the result thereof; and Shri R. G. Dubey: Shri Bibhuti Mishra: Shri D. C. Sharma: (c) whether the culprits have been Shri D. D. Puri: apprehended? Shri p. R. Chakravertl: Shri Indrajit Gupta: The Minister of Home Affairs (Shri Shri M. L. Dwivedi: Nanda): (a) to (c). Investigations with Shri Hem Barua: regard to the disappearance and sub- Dr. L. M Singhvi: sequent recovery of the sacred relic Shrimati Savitri Nigam: of the Prophet from the Hazratbal Shri Onkar Lal Berwa: shrine are being pursued with vigour. Shri Tridib Kumar The Central Intelligence Bureau are Chaudhurl: affording every possible assistance to Shri P. K. Ghosh: the State Police in this matter. Some Shri Gulshan: arrests have already been made and Shri Solanki: more arrests may have to be made Shri P. H. Bheel: later. The investigation is not yet Shri Kachhavaiya: complete, but as soon as it is complet- Shri S. M. Banerjee: ed the case will be filed in court. Shri Harish Chandra .31. Mathur: ~i'~f~: 'PlT~~ Shri Kisbnapal Singh: Shri Nath Pal: ~ ~m;;n:rr;r 1FT qm ~ it Shri G. Mohanty: ~ ~ ~, ~ '11J1: ~ Shri Sarjoo Pandey: \ Shrl Ram Harkll YadaY: rt ~ '" ~;3'f ~ 1FT ;mr Shri Kajrolkar: ~m;;@'~~ ? :2025 (al) LS.-l. 221 Oral Answers FEBRUARY 12, 1964 Oral Answers ~~:~~ m ;rT1l' ~ ~ f~ ~i ~ ;f ~ f.I;ln ~ ron f.I; ~ "I'roft ~ fi!i'if ~, '3"{fl{ ifliT ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ omft ~ f.,it ~~ ~ ~~ l';f f~ ~ ~ ~l'i f~ ~ ~ ~ I ;it 'lrif >iff1iiT ~ ~ f~ 1ft ~', f , , ~ if;R'UI" ~ ;rT1l' f Ifr.IT Q('Jit1rr I 'fTl ~ ~ I ~ l[t, ~f ~ ~ ' ' ~ if m;m: ifliT m ~ ~ ? ~ '(A m 1frof : ~ ;;ylf ;m ~ I ~ ~ ~~ : cr ~ :~ ~ fif; ;rT1l' <!m'IT ~ ~ I ~ '3"<r'1i'r f qr;;r ISIT ;f~: it ~ ;rT1l' ;rift <!m'IT m or@' ~ I nm 'fliffif; ;;ror ~ ~ ;;rr ~ ~ fif; ~ff i ~ ' f~ ~ ;rift g-m ISIT ~~ ~ : ~'ifT m ~ '3";r ..rt<r1 ~ ;rT1l' ~ o\'l!; or@' <rc!<'IT ~ fif; ~ ifliT ~ ;;r;f f~ ~ 'tTfc::'q1 ~ 0llfiffi'lr1 'fiT l[N ~ I lilT '(A m qm : ir<:T ~ 151'1 ;f~ : lfR'f"'t<r ... ~ >ifr ~ w iTrr r~ ~ : ~~~~ I '3"{fiffm ;;r;f f~ '1TCT 'fiT ~ or@' ~ I ~'~~ ': ~;;rr;r;:rr~ ~ fit; ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ;rT1l' Shri P. C. Borooah: May I know ;m ~ I ~ '!ilf i ~ or@' l[TifT whether any report is available to the err authorities to say that there is an un- ~ I >if) 'Iiffi't if "W tTit ~ ~ seen foreign hand involved in the relic ;;ylf m<!m'IT ~ ;;rf.t ~ I theft case and, if so, .... Mr. Speaker: That would be known ISIT ....'('1: it ~ ;rT1l' ~i;r rn after the investigation is completed. ore<'IT 'tm I Shrl A. P. Jain: In order to conduct any investigation successfully, some Ill) ~ ~ : ifliT ~ 'liT motive has to be discovered. May I ~ii~~ ~f ;~~'liT know whether during this investiga- ~~~'li' m :~ tion whiCh has been conducted so far, the motive tor the theft has been dis- ~ 'liT ~ffir ~ : 'Ii't ~ m ~ covered--one or two alternative mo- ~'fiT;;r;;r~ tives, whatever it might be? Shri Nanda: That will be linked up ISIT iRT: ~ ~ ~~ ~ f.I; ~ tn:: with the wlhole inquiry. ~ f~ if;T lfi1r vii" fif; ~ ;;rt;r ij ~ mif?: ~ 'Ii't, ~ itm pr Shri Trictib Kumar Chaadhari: May I know it the case ot the theft of Hindu 1iT I ;;r;;r~f~ f ifi ;;rr~~fif; idols from Janlmu area ..... ~~~ rr fr rr~' T' i il' : m :~'fiT~~f ;~ Mr. Speaker: Here we are concerned with this relic tlheft only. ~~~ Shri Tridib Kumar Chaadhurl: I am 1fT ~ : mm : ifliT it ;;rr;r only seeking to ask whether that wu connected because both the tlhings oc- fim ~ fif; ~ 'liT ~ ~ qf,rer curred simultaneously and whether iIT\'f ott ;it ;ftU ~, ~ wrofulif it there is .... <hal A!l8tDers MAGHA 23, 1885 (SAKA) <hal Answers Mr. Speaker: Unless the investiga- here are deputed, and they assisted tion is completed, how can the Home say just now. Minister express his opinion whetiher there is any connection or not. Sbrimati Renu Cbakravartty: Has it been brought to the notice of Govern- Shri Tridib Kumar Cbaudhuri: Do ment that On the 4th January, Presi- the Government suspect any conspi- dent Ayub had stated that this was not racy behind this thing? the work of any Muslim and that it was a conspiracy, and if so, wlhy was Mr. Speaker: They should not dis- it not possible for Government to im- close it. mediately issue a contradiction so that many of the things that happened sub- Shri N. C. Cbatterjee: In view of sequently need not have happened? President Ayub's outburst, statement, that it must have been done by non- Shri Nanda: It might have led to cer- Muslims, may we know whether there tain complications at that stage? is any truth in that allegation of Pre- sident Ayuh? Shrl Nath Pai: The relic was dis- covered, as far as the reports in the Shri Nanda: No. press go, on the 4th January. May I know why the identification was de- 'll ifj : 'fl1T lfQ .,-'r ~'f, T 'f layed for one month when it was known how explosive the situation was ~T ~r ~, 'f~ ~ <m'f 'R ~T ~ ~ and that Pakistan and other interest- f.!; ~ ' 'f it. f'fi'f'1 ~~ ~i ed elements were trying to fan the frenzy of the people by saying that fi~, the relic that was replaced was a forg- ed one? Why was the identification of 'l( 'l'oq"f: it,," ~i T f~ .,-r ~~ the relic and the, culprits being delay- ~;r ' '~fr 'ill'RT w 'fif1 ~'fT it ~if ed? 'fif\' "·ll'if<IT I Shri Nanda: Mudll earlier than the Shri Indrajit Gupta: May I know public Deedar, several persons who whether these persons who were ap- were in a position to say whether the prehended were caught red-handed in relic was genuine or not had done so, the very act of restoring the relic to and that was made known, There were the shrine and, if not, why was it not other complications there and it took possible for the Central Intelligence time to clear them up, Bureau to apprehend the people in 1Ihe very act of restoring the relic? 'll "(n; ~ Ifm' : it ~ ~i ~ f~ ;;rT ~~ ~ fir.lfri it Shri Nanda: I may assure the hon. Members that this process, as I ex- ~ f.!;it 'Tit 'f~ 'fT1l" 'I' ~ plained now, is going to be completed ~~ i i r~ ~ ~ fft in the course of a week or so. ~ ' 'T'fT ;f mq", it ~ ~, fr lflIT Mr. Speaker: The first part may be ~ ~ f~ ~ 'fT1l" ~ Oifi ~T ~ answered whetiher they were caught 'Tit? red-handed when they restored the relic. "" ~ : ~i f~ m ~ 8hrl Nanda: As to whether the per- i n ~~~~r~ Bon was caught red-handed or not, it depends upon tihe actual process whe- ther he was caught red-handed while l Tmr~ f: ~~ putting the thing back. These are de- itu ~ If>l nor ~ I im nor ~i' TT ~ FEBRUARY 12, 1964 226 fit; ~ <:flIi ;;;R; 0fl1I' ;r ~ 'fiT Ifil"{III' here are deputed, and they assist ill the investigaUons. ~r~ I Shri Bhagwat Jba Azad: May I know ~ ~~ : ~i ~ 'fiT how far it is true that the investigation m'~~~ ? which was primarily in the !hands of Government has now been entrusted ~i ~ ~: ~ ft;rlr to the State Government and the Cen- m f.ti tre are only assisting them, and if it is l.fi!: tI'<mr '3Om- ~ fil; ~ mRrc ~ iiI ~ I true, the reasons for this, in view of the past experience? ~ ~~f ll : lf~ ~ 'fiT Shri Nanda: These are only conclud- sm' ;r~ ~, ~ ;:rcmJrrro 'Il1" iffil' ing processes.