Third Series1R.3 Wednesday, February 12, 1964 Magha 23, 1885 (Saka)
/2.6$%+$ '(%$7(6
Seventh Session Third/RN6DEKD
/2.6$%+$6(&5(7$5,$7 New Delhi CONTENTS
NO.3 Wednesday, February 12, 19641Magha 23,1885 (Saka)
Oral Answers to Questions- COLUMNS *Starred Questions Nos. 31 to 37 219r-60 Written Answers to Questions- Starred Questions Nos. 38 to 60 260-75 Unstarred Questions Nos. 92 to 127 275--98 Paper laid on the Table 299-300 Committee on Private Members' Bill and Resolutions- Thirty-second Report 300 Estimates Committee- Forty-second Report 300 Statement by Member 300-03 Motion re: communal disturbances in East Pakistan and West Bengal 30 3-435 Shri H. N. Mukerjee ... 306- 28 Shri Surendranath Dwivedy 328-41 Shrimati Renuka Ray 341-47 Shri N. C. Chatterjee 347-56 Shri A. C. Guha 357-63 Shrimati Subhadra Joshi 364-73 Shri P. K. Deo 373-78 Shri C. K. Bhattacharyya 378-84 Shri Bade 384--95 Shri Bakar Ali Mirza 395-400 Shri P. R. Chakraverti 4OO-D6 Shri Tridib Kumar Chaudhuri . 406-14 Shri Abdul Ghani Goni 414-19 Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia 419-33 Shri Nanda 434-35
*The sign+marked above the name ofa Member indicateS that the Ques- tion was actually asked on the floor of the House by that Member. LO~ SABRA DEBATES
219 220 LOK SABHA Shri Shiv Charan Gupta: Shri Hem Raj: Wednesday, FebruaTY 12, 1964/ Shri Swell: Magha 23, 1885 (Saka) Shri Moban Swamp: Shri K07a: Shri p. R. Patel: The Lok Sabha met at Eleven oJ the Dr. Mahadeva Prasad: Clock Shri Ram Sewak Yadav: Shri Bagri: [MR. SPEAKER in the· ChaiT] Shri Abdul Ghani Goni· ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS l Shri Vidyalankar: . '!'heft of Relic from Hazratbal Mosque Will the Minister of Home Allairll + be pleased to state: r Shri Yashpal Singh: Shri P. C. Borooah: Shri Prakash Vir Shastri: (a) whether investigations have Shri Maheswar Naik: been made in regard to the disappear- ance and subsequent recovery uf the Shri Bishanchander Seth: Shri B. p. Yaelava: sacred relic of the Prophet from the Shri Dhaon: Hazaratbal shrine by the Central In- telligence Department; Shri Visbram Prasad: Shri Bbapat Jba Azad: (b) if so, the result thereof; and Shri R. G. Dubey: Shri Bibhuti Mishra: Shri D. C. Sharma: (c) whether the culprits have been Shri D. D. Puri: apprehended? Shri p. R. Chakravertl: Shri Indrajit Gupta: The Minister of Home Affairs (Shri Shri M. L. Dwivedi: Nanda): (a) to (c). Investigations with Shri Hem Barua: regard to the disappearance and sub- Dr. L. M Singhvi: sequent recovery of the sacred relic Shrimati Savitri Nigam: of the Prophet from the Hazratbal Shri Onkar Lal Berwa: shrine are being pursued with vigour. Shri Tridib Kumar The Central Intelligence Bureau are Chaudhurl: affording every possible assistance to Shri P. K. Ghosh: the State Police in this matter. Some Shri Gulshan: arrests have already been made and Shri Solanki: more arrests may have to be made Shri P. H. Bheel: later. The investigation is not yet Shri Kachhavaiya: complete, but as soon as it is complet- Shri S. M. Banerjee: ed the case will be filed in court. Shri Harish Chandra .31. Mathur: ~i'~f~: 'PlT~~ Shri Kisbnapal Singh: Shri Nath Pal: ~ ~m;;n:rr;r 1FT qm ~ it Shri G. Mohanty: ~ ~ ~, ~ '11J1: ~ Shri Sarjoo Pandey: \ Shrl Ram Harkll YadaY: rt ~ '" ~;3'f ~ 1FT ;mr Shri Kajrolkar: ~m;;@'~~ ? :2025 (al) LS.-l. 221 Oral Answers FEBRUARY 12, 1964 Oral Answers
~~:~~ m ;rT1l' ~ ~ f~ ~i ~ ;f ~ f.I;ln ~ ron f.I; ~ "I'roft ~ fi!i'if ~, '3"{fl{ ifliT ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ omft ~ f.,it ~~ ~ ~~ l';f f~ ~ ~ ~l'i f~ ~ ~ ~ I ;it 'lrif >iff1iiT ~ ~ f~ 1ft ~', f , , ~ if;R'UI" ~ ;rT1l' f Ifr.IT Q('Jit1rr I 'fTl ~ ~ I ~ l[t, ~f ~ ~ ' ' ~ if m;m: ifliT m ~ ~ ? ~ '(A m 1frof : ~ ;;ylf ;m ~ I ~ ~ ~~ : cr ~ :~ ~ fif; ;rT1l'
lilT '(A m qm : ir<:T ~ 151'1 ;f~ : lfR'f"'tifr ~ w iTrr r~ ~ : ~~~~ I '3"{fiffm ;;r;f f~ '1TCT 'fiT ~ or@' ~ I ~'~~ ': ~;;rr;r;:rr~ ~ fit; ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ;rT1l' Shri P. C. Borooah: May I know ;m ~ I ~ '!ilf i ~ or@' l[TifT whether any report is available to the err authorities to say that there is an un- ~ I >if) 'Iiffi't if "W tTit ~ ~ seen foreign hand involved in the relic ;;ylf mShri Nanda: That will be linked up ISIT iRT: ~ ~ ~~ ~ f.I; ~ tn:: with the wlhole inquiry. ~ f~ if;T lfi1r vii" fif; ~ ;;rt;r ij ~ mif?: ~ 'Ii't, ~ itm pr Shri Trictib Kumar Chaadhari: May I know it the case ot the theft of Hindu 1iT I ;;r;;r~f~ f ifi ;;rr~~fif; idols from Janlmu area ...... ~~~ rr fr rr~' T' i il' : m :~'fiT~~f ;~ Mr. Speaker: Here we are concerned with this relic tlheft only. ~~~ Shri Tridib Kumar Chaadhurl: I am 1fT ~ : mm : ifliT it ;;rr;r only seeking to ask whether that wu connected because both the tlhings oc- fim ~ fif; ~ 'liT ~ ~ qf,rer curred simultaneously and whether iIT\'f ott ;it ;ftU ~, ~ wrofulif it there is .... Mr. Speaker: Unless the investiga- here are deputed, and they assisted tion is completed, how can the Home say just now. Minister express his opinion whetiher there is any connection or not. Sbrimati Renu Cbakravartty: Has it been brought to the notice of Govern- Shri Tridib Kumar Cbaudhuri: Do ment that On the 4th January, Presi- the Government suspect any conspi- dent Ayub had stated that this was not racy behind this thing? the work of any Muslim and that it was a conspiracy, and if so, wlhy was Mr. Speaker: They should not dis- it not possible for Government to im- close it. mediately issue a contradiction so that many of the things that happened sub- Shri N. C. Cbatterjee: In view of sequently need not have happened? President Ayub's outburst, statement, that it must have been done by non- Shri Nanda: It might have led to cer- Muslims, may we know whether there tain complications at that stage? is any truth in that allegation of Pre- sident Ayuh? Shrl Nath Pai: The relic was dis- covered, as far as the reports in the Shri Nanda: No. press go, on the 4th January. May I know why the identification was de- 'll ifj : 'fl1T lfQ .,-'r ~'f, T 'f layed for one month when it was known how explosive the situation was ~T ~r ~, 'f~ ~ l nor ~ I im nor ~i' TT ~ FEBRUARY 12, 1964 226 fit; ~ <:flIi ;;;R; 0fl1I' ;r ~ 'fiT Ifil"{III' here are deputed, and they assist ill the investigaUons. ~r~ I Shri Bhagwat Jba Azad: May I know ~ ~~ : ~i ~ 'fiT how far it is true that the investigation m'~~~ ? which was primarily in the !hands of Government has now been entrusted ~i ~ ~: ~ ft;rlr to the State Government and the Cen- m f.ti tre are only assisting them, and if it is l.fi!: tI' lT~m~: ;rTll ~Tif@ Shri Hem Barna: May I know whe- ther the attention of Government has ~r;;rr ~ ~ been drawn to a statement made by Bakshi Ghulam Mohammed to the ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~ fil; effect that the people of Jammu and orR it if:rIndia for saying this or he said mo