DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Wildlife Site Review 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Wildlife Site Review 2012 BRENTWOOD BOROUGH LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EECOS, December 2012 Brentwood Borough Local Wildlife Sites Review 2012 BRENTWOOD BOROUGH LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE REVIEW 2012 FINAL December 2012 Prepared by Essex Ecology Services Ltd. EECOS Abbotts Hall Farm, Great Wigborough, Colchester, Essex, CO5 7RZ 01621 862986, [email protected] Company Registered No. 2853947 VAT Registered No. 945 7459 77 Brentwood Borough Council Town Hall Client Ingrave Road Brentwood Essex CM15 8AY Client Representative Kate Gordon, Principal Planner Author Adrian Knowles BSc FRES MIEEM, Senior Ecologist Approved By Neil Harvey BSc MIEEM, Manager of EECOS Report Status Final Date of Issue 4th December 2012 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EECOS, December 2012 Brentwood Borough Local Wildlife Sites Review 2012 IMPORTANT NOTES Nomenclature The terms "Site of Importance for Nature Conservation" (SINC) and “County Wildlife Site” (CoWS) used in previous reports are here replaced by the currently generally accepted term of “Local Wildlife Site” (LoWS). Where a building, other property or location is used in the name of a LoWS it is not being implied that the ownership of that LoWS is associated with the property named. It is merely a descriptive use for ease of locating a piece of land that might have no universally recognised name or other obvious geographical location. In the report, when a location is referred to as a Site (with a capital S) this is an abbreviation that means it is a Local Wildlife Site. Scope The new National Planning Policy Framework places a responsibility on all local planning authorities to protect and enhance their flora, fauna and wildlife habitats (“biodiversity”) and also geological features and soils (“geodiversity”). This report only considers the former. Our appreciation of geodiversity and the requirements to conserve it are at a more elementary stage in Essex, with ongoing research into a series of LoGS (Local Geological/geomorphological Sites). Rationale It is hoped that this identification of Local Wildlife Sites is not seen as a hindrance to the livelihood of those landowners affected, or an attempt to blindly influence the management of such sites. It is an attempt to describe the wildlife resource we have in the county as a whole, which has been preserved thus far as a result of the management by landowners. The Essex Wildlife Trust and the Local and Unitary Authorities of Essex hope to be able to help landowners retain and enhance this biodiversity for the future. In recent years, the existence of a Local Wildlife Site on a farm has been seen as an advantage when applying for grant-aid from agri-environment schemes, with such grants favouring areas with a proven nature conservation interest. Public Access Identification as a Local Wildlife Site within this report does not confer any right of public access to the site, above and beyond any Public Rights of Way that may exist. The vast majority of the Sites are in private ownership and this should be respected at all times. Those few sites that are described as being appropriate for environmental education already have some level of public access. Land Ownership It has always been the intention of the Essex Wildlife Trust to contact all landowners of LoWS, advising them of this identification and promoting nature conservation management of the site. To that end, the Essex Wildlife Trust has appointed a Local Wildlife Sites Officer to administer this suite of sites across the county. While this lengthy undertaking is in progress it is requested that the Essex Wildlife Trust is contacted prior to any formal approach regarding any Site identified within this report. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EECOS, December 2012 Brentwood Borough Local Wildlife Sites Review 2012 Boundaries Whilst every attempt has been made to ensure accurate mapping of the site boundaries, the accompanying maps should be considered as being illustrative only. This is especially true for any SSSIs (Sites of Special Scientific Interest), which are included within LoWS site boundary maps to help interpret the context of LoWS in the wider countryside. Definitive SSSI boundaries are maintained by Natural England. The Essex Wildlife Trust should be consulted over the precise boundary of all Local Wildlife Sites, should any dispute occur or precise determination be required. Planning The information within this report should not be used as a bypass to the normal planning consultation process. It is inevitable that, with the passage of time, some Local Wildlife Sites will be lost or damaged to the extent that they are no longer considered as such. Similarly, new Sites may be identified and periodically added to the list for each Local Authority. For these reasons, the Essex Wildlife Trust still wishes to be consulted on all planning proposals affecting areas of open countryside, regardless of whether or not they apparently affect a Site detailed within this report. This report will allow a greater understanding of the wildlife resources of the district/borough and will make the consultation process much faster and more cost-effective. The new National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) makes clear that there should be a presumption in favour of sustainable development, with the caveat that all sites of significant nature conservation value should be afforded appropriate protection within the planning system. This might lead to an assumption that all land outside of LoWS designation is fit to be developed, with no nature conservation issues. This is most definitely not the case. Legally protected bat roosts, Great Crested Newt breeding ponds with associated terrestrial habitat and Badger setts are not routinely identified within the LoWS register for any Local Authority, yet they remain important material considerations that could be affected by planning proposals. Failure to consider these, and other similar, wildlife issues could result in an offence being committed by a developer if the ecological issues relating to a site are not properly explored prior to the submission of a planning application and it is recommended that no planning consent is granted without an appropriate ecological assessment accompanying the planning submission. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EECOS, December 2012 Brentwood Borough Local Wildlife Sites Review 2012 INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Objectives of Review 2 1.4 Review Process and Methodology 3 1.5 Limitations of Survey 5 2. RESULTS 2.1 Identification of Local Wildlife Sites 6 2.2 Changes to Old SINC Network 7 2.3 Additions 10 2.4 Summary of Additions/Deletions 11 2.5 Other Sites 12 3. DISCUSSION 3.1 Local Wildlife Site Network 13 3.2 Living Landscapes 15 3.3 England BAP Priority Habitats 17 3.4 County Context 21 3.5 The Future for Planning and Nature Conservation in Brentwood 23 Appendix 1 Summary Table of Local Wildlife Sites Appendix 2 Register of Brentwood Borough Local Wildlife Sites Appendix 3 Register of Potential Local Wildlife Sites Appendix 4 Summary of LoWS Management Issues Annex 1 Local Wildlife Sites Selection Criteria (separate document) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EECOS, December 2012 Brentwood Borough Local Wildlife Sites Review 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. In 1992, the Essex Wildlife Trust identified a suite of “Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation” (SINCs) across Brentwood Borough, comprising areas of ancient woodland, flower-rich grasslands, heath and other areas of substantive nature conservation importance. 2. In 1994, a boundary change transferred a small number of similar sites previously identified by the London Borough of Havering into Brentwood Borough, without considering whether or not they met the site selection criteria in use at that time. 3. Since then, there have been significant changes to the structure and breadth of the Selection Criteria used to identify such sites, now known in Essex as Local Wildlife Sites (LoWS). 4. These changes have incorporated into the selection process the national and local Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) initiatives (not included in the 1992 review, since the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro that started the BAP process was only held that year). Other changes include the exclusion of nationally significant wildlife sites (Sites of Special Scientific Interest, SSSI) from the LoWS register, in line with national guidance from Defra. 5. This current review has seen a net increase of just seven sites (from 140 in 1992 to 147 now), but this statistic does not take account of the considerable number of changes that are hereby brought about. 6. Sixteen of the old sites have been dropped from the LoWS register on the grounds that they no longer meet the more demanding selection criteria. Thirty-four completely new sites have been identified, along with numerous more subtle boundary changes that have seen parcels of land added to, or deleted from, existing sites. In some instances, two or more old sites have now been merged into one, larger site. 7. The three SSSIs within the borough (Curtismill Green, Thorndon Park and The Coppice, Kelvedon Hatch)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16 August 2018 Our Ref: 244199 Basildon Borough
    Date: 16 August 2018 Our ref: 244199 Basildon Borough Council Braintree District Council Customer Services Brentwood Borough Council Hornbeam House Castle Point Borough Council Crewe Business Park Electra Way Chelmsford Borough Council Crewe Colchester Borough Council Cheshire Maldon District Council CW1 6GJ Rochford District Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council T 0300 060 3900 Tendring District Council Thurrock Borough Council Uttlesford District Council Essex Place Services BY EMAIL ONLY Dear All Emerging strategic approach relating to the Essex Coast Recreational disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS) – Revised interim advice to ensure new residential development and any associated recreational disturbance impacts on European designated sites are compliant with the Habitats Regulations1 This letter provides Natural England’s revised interim advice further to that issued on 16th November 2017. This advice is provided to ensure that any residential planning applications coming forward ahead of the Essex Coast RAMS which have the potential to impact on coastal European designated sites are compliant with the Habitats Regulations. It specifically relates to additional recreational impacts that may occur on the interest features of the following European designated sites: Essex Estuaries Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Hamford Water Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site2 Stour and Orwell Estuaries SPA and Ramsar site (Stour on the Essex side only) Colne Estuary SPA and Ramsar site Blackwater Estuary SPA and Ramsar site Dengie SPA and Ramsar site Crouch and Roach Estuaries SPA and Ramsar site Foulness Estuary SPA and Ramsar site Benfleet and Southend Marshes SPA and Ramsar site Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA and Ramsar site (Essex side only) 1 Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, as amended (commonly known as the ‘Habitats Regulations’) 2 Listed or proposed Wetlands of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention (Ramsar) sites are protected as a matter of Government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Essex Estuaries
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Essex Estuaries Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI Kent
    Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI Kent Supporting Information Issued by Natural England’s Sussex and Kent Team on 11 March 2021 Page 1 of 36 Contact points and further information This supplement is issued on request by Natural England’s Kent and Sussex Team and is intended to be read in conjunction with the notification document for owners, occupiers and other notified parties. During the current coronavirus situation, Natural England staff are working remotely, and a limited number of our offices are open. Please send any correspondence relating to this notification by email or contact us by phone using the information below. Alternatively, you can send a response online using the link below. Your contact point for enquiries relating to this notification is Neil Fuller. Telephone number: 07900 227219 E-mail: [email protected] Online: https://consult.defra.gov.uk/natural-england/swanscombe-peninsula Page 2 of 36 Contents Summary 1. Information used to support the selection of Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI. 2. Explanation of how Swanscombe Peninsula meets the SSSI selection guidelines. 3. Assessment of the current condition of Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI. 4. Selection of ‘operations requiring Natural England’s consent’. 5. Photographs. Annex 1. Habitat Map. Annex 2. Map showing location of comparison sites listed in Table 3. Annex 3. Map showing location of comparison sites listed in Table 5. Annex 4. List of invertebrate species with Conservation Status recorded at Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI. Page 3 of 36 Summary Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI is notified under section 28C of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The site is a complex of open mosaic habitats on previously developed land and traditional estuarine habitats located near and within the River Thames, Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • Southend Issues and Options Consultation Report
    Issues and Options Document Consultation Statement September 2019 Contents Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Consultation under Regulation 18 Southend New Local Plan Issues and Options Section 3 Duty to Co-operate Section 4 Key Issues identified Section 5 Responses from Key Stakeholders Section 6 Continuous Engagement Section 7 Sustainability Appraisal Section 8 What You Said and What We’ll Do Appendices Appendix 1 Representation responses and Breakdown on Sections and Questions Appendix 2 Summary of Comments made at Drop-in Events and Stakeholder Events including Report produced by Copper Appendix 3 List of Consultees Appendix 4 Consultation Material Appendix 5 Methods of Consultation Appendix 6 Schedule of Consultation Events Section 1: Introduction 1.1 This statement has been prepared to comply with the requirements of Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (“the Regulations”). 1.2 The Local Plan will ultimately influence how Southend will grow and develop over the next twenty years. The Regulation 18 consultation marks the start of the engagement stage of the Plan and represents the scoping stage to decide what should be included in it. Furthermore, consultation on the Plan, including with key stakeholders helps to ensure that it is based on up to date, robust evidence. 1.3 Comments were invited from interested parties on the proposed vision and spatial strategy options for the plan and on a range of issues including housing, the economy, tourism, transport and the environment. Receiving comments at this stage helps to ensure that people living, working or who have a stake in the future of Southend have a say in how these issues are addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex Thames Gateway Water Cycle Study Scoping Study
    Essex Thames Gateway Essex Thames Gateway Water Cycle Study Scoping Study Final Report March 2009 Prepared for: Basildon District Council, Castle Point Borough Council, Rochford District Council, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council , Essex County Council Essex Thames Gateway Planning Authorities Water Cycle Study – Scoping Study Revision Schedule Essex Thames Gateway Water Cycle Study – Scoping Report March 2009 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 January 2009 Draft Scoping Mary Pyne Carl Pelling Jon Robinson Report Assistant Water Specialist Senior Consultant - Water Associate 02 March 2009 Final Scoping Mary Pyne Carl Pelling Jon Robinson report Assistant Water Specialist Senior Consultant - Water Associate Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's RG21 7PP appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the Tel: 01256 310200 purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Fax: 01256 310201 written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • HRA Appendix 1 European Site Characterisation
    London Southend Airport and Environs JAAP: Habitats Regulations Assessment European Site Characterisations Appendix I: European Site Characterisations Special Areas of Conservation 1. Essex Estuaries SAC Special Protection Areas 2. Benfleet and Southend Marshes SPA 3. Blackwater Estuary SPA 4. Crouch and Roach Estuaries SPA 5. Dengie SPA 6. Foulness SPA 7. Medway Estuary and Marshes SPA 8. Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA Ramsar Sites 9. Benfleet and Southend Marshes Ramsar 10. Blackwater Estuary Ramsar 11. Crouch and Roach Estuaries Ramsar 12. Dengie Ramsar 13. Foulness Ramsar 14. Medway Estuary and Marshes Ramsar 15. Thames Estuary and Marshes Ramsar January 2013 1 /55 enfusion London Southend Airport and Environs JAAP: Habitats Regulations Assessment European Site Characterisations Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Site Name: Essex Estuaries Habitats Regulations Assessment: Data Proforma Location Grid Ref: TM103048 JNCC Site Code: UK0013690 Size (ha): 46140.82 Designation: SAC Site Description This is a large estuarine site in south-east England, and is a typical, undeveloped, coastal plain estuarine system with associated open coast mudflats and sandbanks. The site comprises the major estuaries of the Colne, Blackwater, Crouch and Roach rivers and is important as an extensive area of contiguous estuarine habitat. Essex Estuaries contains a very wide range of characteristic marine and estuarine sediment communities and some diverse and unusual marine communities in the lower reaches, including rich sponge communities on mixed, tide-swept substrates. Sublittoral areas have a very rich invertebrate fauna, including the reef-building worm Sabellaria spinulosa, the brittlestar Ophiothrix fragilis, crustaceans and ascidians. The site also has large areas of saltmarsh and other important coastal habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary
    Standing Environment Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary Arrangements for the provision of environmental advice in pollution incidents affecting sea and estuarial water and shoreline between and including Lowestoft to Ramsgate. Part One - General Overview PENULTIMATE DRAFT 8 September, 2011 M.C. King Greater Thames Estuary Standing Environment Group Operational Guidance Document (version one) July 2004 Page 0 of 91 Table of Contents 1 DISTRIBUTION LIST: ..........................................................................................................................3 2 RECORD OF AMENDMENTS............................................................................................................5 3 PREFACE……………........................................................................................................................6 4 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................7 5 SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT..........................................................................................................7 6 THE STANDING ENVIRONMENT GROUP FOR THE GREATER THAMES ESTUARY ...........................8 6.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE. ............................................................................................................................. 8 6.2 SCOPE OF GROUP FUNCTIONS ................................................................................................................ 8 6.3 AREA OF OPERATION ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report
    Appendix L Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan 2 Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Environmental Report Environment Agency April 2010 Final Report 9T4884 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY Introduction This report provides an assessment of the environmental impacts of the Essex and South Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan (SMP). The assessment is informed by the appraisal process within the SMP. The assessment seeks to establish the environmental impacts of the SMP, to evaluate the overall impact of the SMP and to suggest monitoring and mitigation to address any negative impacts. The overriding theme which emerges in this assessment is that the determination of actual impacts is extremely difficult due to the long timeline and uncertainties surrounding the plan and its impacts. The assessment does however confirm that the SMP provides for a wide range of positive impacts, and where negative impacts occur, they are the result of policy which seeks to maintain other environmental values. The Essex and South Suffolk Coast Essex has one of the longest coastlines of any English county, and this study covers approximately 440 km of coast between Landguard Point (the most southerly point of Felixstowe) and Southend. It is an unusual coastline incorporating a series of interlinked estuaries with open coast between them. The estuarine areas are dominated by muddy intertidal flats and saltmarshes, whilst the open coast has more varied features including clay sea cliffs and shingle, sandy and muddy beaches. Overall the coastline is predominantly low lying and protected by flood embankments or sea walls, together with groynes. As areas have been reclaimed from the sea, significant amounts of grazing marsh are at or below sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Definition of Favourable Conservation Status for Great Cormorant
    Definition of Favourable Conservation Status for Great Cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo Defining Favourable Conservation Status Project Authors: Stuart Newson & Graham Austin www.gov.uk/natural-england Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for their contributions to the production of this document: Teresa Frost and Heidi Mellan at BTO. Lucy Bellini, Andy Brown, Julie Hanna, Matt Heydon, Ivan Lakin, Sally Mousley and the Defining Favourable Conservation Status team at Natural England. 1 Contents About the DFCS project ...................................................................................................................3 Introduction......................................................................................................................................4 Summary Favourable Conservation Status Definition........................................................................5 Species definition and ecosystem context.........................................................................................7 Metrics...........................................................................................................................................10 Evidence .......................................................................................................................................11 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................17 Annex 1: References......................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH ESSEX F T, ! 7
    :: ; i f - SOUTH ESSEX f T, ! 7. CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT ‘I V / • W ISlEOt GI 'A1MOUTH * mEtiotouot < • M U C H IOWRTOH. • umtmc • Etf • HUNT1NGOON 1 • IE W O M ) \ IfSW KM NRA . M U 'O N KEYHEj ; 'UtWICH COICHESIEI* National Rivers Authority V CUC TOH OK SEA (HELMSEOIO Anglian Region IBILLERICA* ^ g Jj»«H A M OM«ctoucH t JW UNW '»ju(|THENOOtl su NOVEMBER 1995 CATCHMENT KEY DETAILS GENERAL Land Area 1841.54 km2 Groundwater WATER Population 1990 678,000 N o additional water available RESOURCES Projected to year 2001 694,000 Surface Water Main Towns and Populations N o additional summer water. Limited winter Southend-on-Sea water availaBle suBject to cessation (Municipal Borough) 167,200 conditions to safeguard the water Canvey Island 35,600 environment and other w’ater users. Basildon (Municipal Borough) 96,400 Stanford-le Hope/Benfleet/ PuBlic Water Supply ABstractions Hadleigh/Thundersley 49,600 Essex & Suffolk Water: There are two Chalk Corringham 32,300 puBlic water supply aBstractions in the Grays 48,100 catchment. These are located at Linford and Rayleigh 28,000 Stifford, and are licensed to aBstract 3728 (Data from Essex County Council, Planning Department) M l/a(l M l/a= 1 million litres) ADMINISTRATIVE County Council: Length of Designated Main River FLOOD DEFENCE DETAILS Essex Fluvial 313.6 km Tidal 101.4 km Borough/District Councils: Length of Main River EmBankment Basildon Brentwood Fluvial 4.5 km Castle Point Chelmsford Length of NRA Tidal Defences 145.4 km Maldon Rochford Area at risk from tidal flooding 97.5 km2 Southend-on-Sea Thurrock Area at risk from fluvial flooding 27.1 knr Unitary Authority: The Anglian Region of the NRA has no NAVIGATION London Borough of Havering statutory Navigation responsiBility within this plan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex LGAP 12
    Essex Local Geodiversity Action Plan March 2013 Map based upon published geological maps with the permission of the British Geological Survey. Produced by Essex County Council (1998) Contents Page What is Geodiversity? 3 Why is it important? 4 What is special about Essex Geodiversity? 5 Geodiversity’s influence on the development of Essex 6 Geodiversity and national policy 10 The Essex Local Geodiversity Action Plan (LGAP) 11 GeoEssex and the Essex LGAP 12 Key objectives of the Essex LGAP 13 50 million year old shark teeth from the Naze cliffs Objectives 1 to 7 14-20 Attachment 1 – Geological SSSI’s in Essex 22 2 What is Geodiversity? Geodiversity has been defined as: ‘The natural range (diversity) of geological (rocks, minerals, fossils), geomorphological (landform and processes), and soil features. It includes their assemblages, relationships, properties, interpretations and systems’1. 1 Gray M. (2004) Geodiversity: Valuing and conserving abiotic nature, Wiley & Sons. A disused gravel pit near Colchester providing visible evidence of the former route of the Thames through central Essex 3 Why is it important? Besides being a fascinating subject in its own right, Geodiversity is fundamental to so many aspects of human life and activity. It determines: The nature of our landscape and coast. The nature of our soils on which land use patterns and our agriculture depend. The nature of our biodiversity. Our hydrology. Much of our historical and present industrial development and resource exploitation, e.g. water supplies, brick clay, chalk for cement and agricultural lime, and sand and gravel. Understanding our geodiversity is therefore key to a full appreciation of the services, both aesthetic and economic, that it provides, and also to ensuring that it is managed in a sustainable way.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Mapping Report Phase 9 (2016-2021)
    Anglian Coastal Monitoring Programme Phase 9 (2016 – 2021) Habitat Mapping Project Report: RP049/A/2018 Project: PM_1761 Report version 1.0 March 2018 Version Date Contributor Version_1.0 31/03/2018 Geomatics Crispin Hambidge David White Emma Taylor Isobel Moberly Sally Crudge Lucy North James Ford Authored by: Geomatics Environment Agency Horizon House, Deanery Road, Bristol BS1 5AH Email: [email protected] www.gov.uk/environment-agency © Environment Agency 2018 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. PM_1761: Anglian Coastal Monitoring Programme Habitat Mapping 2 of 113 Contents 1. Introduction (lead author Environment Agency) .................................................................... 5 Key Aims and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 5 Outputs ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Extent and Location ..................................................................................................................... 6 Overview map............................................................................................................................................................. 6 List of habitat classes mapped .................................................................................................... 7 Shoreline Management Plan Areas ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]