Southend Issues and Options Consultation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southend Issues and Options Consultation Report Issues and Options Document Consultation Statement September 2019 Contents Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Consultation under Regulation 18 Southend New Local Plan Issues and Options Section 3 Duty to Co-operate Section 4 Key Issues identified Section 5 Responses from Key Stakeholders Section 6 Continuous Engagement Section 7 Sustainability Appraisal Section 8 What You Said and What We’ll Do Appendices Appendix 1 Representation responses and Breakdown on Sections and Questions Appendix 2 Summary of Comments made at Drop-in Events and Stakeholder Events including Report produced by Copper Appendix 3 List of Consultees Appendix 4 Consultation Material Appendix 5 Methods of Consultation Appendix 6 Schedule of Consultation Events Section 1: Introduction 1.1 This statement has been prepared to comply with the requirements of Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 (“the Regulations”). 1.2 The Local Plan will ultimately influence how Southend will grow and develop over the next twenty years. The Regulation 18 consultation marks the start of the engagement stage of the Plan and represents the scoping stage to decide what should be included in it. Furthermore, consultation on the Plan, including with key stakeholders helps to ensure that it is based on up to date, robust evidence. 1.3 Comments were invited from interested parties on the proposed vision and spatial strategy options for the plan and on a range of issues including housing, the economy, tourism, transport and the environment. Receiving comments at this stage helps to ensure that people living, working or who have a stake in the future of Southend have a say in how these issues are addressed. 1.4 Southend Borough Council, together with neighbouring authorities in South Essex and Essex County Council are also working together to address various cross-boundary issues. Details of the Local Plan were therefore raised at regular Essex and South Essex planning officer and councillor meetings. 1.5 It is important to point out that the consultation was a starting point and the Council is not, at this stage, proposing any policies or setting out which sites should be allocated for development. Section 2: Consultation under Regulation 18 Southend New Local Plan Issues and Options 2.1 The Southend on Sea New Local Plan Issues and Options document was published so that representations could be made between 5th February and 2nd April 2019. 2.2 Who we consulted – A list of people and organisations we consulted is set out at Appendix 3. Details of press and social media engagement to advertise the consultation to the general public is set out at Appendix 4 (consultation material). Section 3 of this report sets out our approach to meeting the duty to co-operate, in particular working with neighbouring authorities, Essex County Council and other partners on strategic cross-boundary matters affecting South Essex. 2.3 How we consulted – The methods of consultation are set out in Appendix 5, and a schedule of consultation events are set out at Appendix 6. Section 7 of this report details wider continuous engagement on the Local Plan that has been undertaken to date, including conversations within the Council and with external partners to develop the Southend 2050 ambition and road map. 2.4 Summary of the main issues raised – Section 4 of this consultation report sets out a summary of the key issues raised by those responding to the public consultation on the Issues and Options document. A more detailed summary of each representation submitted is set out at Appendix 1, and Appendix 2 summarises comments made at the drop-in sessions and workshops we ran during the public consultation. Section 5 of the report summarises the main points raised by key stakeholders, including neighbouring local authorities and other statutory consultees. 2.5 Sustainability Appraisal – Section 7 sets out the comments we received on the Sustainability Appraisal and how these should influence the scope and content of the plan objectives and policies. 2.6 How the representations will be taken into account in the plan - Section 8 summarises what you said about the plan and what we will do in response to take the plan forward. Section 3 Duty to Co-operate 3.1 The Council seeks to co-operate and engage with a range of organisations on strategic matters when preparing its new Local Plan. This positive approach will assist in influencing the evolution of the Local Plan. Whilst there is no duty to agree, the Council will endeavour to secure the necessary co-operation on strategic cross-boundary matters before submitting the Local Plan for Examination. 3.2 In order to ensure a strategic and agreed coordinated approach to development in South Essex, in 2017 all six south Essex local authorities and Essex County Council agreed to the establishment of the Association of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) to prepare a suite of plans and documents to guide developments and schemes in the South Essex sub-region. This included the preparation of an agreed 2050 Ambition and a Joint Strategic Plan (JSP), the latter to provide the framework for the preparation of more detailed Local Plans by the six Local Authorities. 3.3 The establishment of an agreed sub-regional framework for growth in south Essex is important to ensure that the six local plans provide for an effective ‘joined-up’ planning approach. 3.4 Throughout the Local Plan preparation process, the list of strategic matters and opportunities for joint working will be kept under review and influence the engagement and co-operation activities promoted. Southend Borough Council will develop new and/or build on existing established joint working mechanisms, as appropriate. Co-operation arrangements the Council propose to employ and/or consider include: • Joint Officer and Member meetings, committees and working groups • Commissioning of joint evidence base studies and reports • Joint or aligned plans across Council areas • Memorandums of Understanding as a framework for co-operation • Getting key decisions in writing from other authorities/bodies • Confirming understanding/intentions in writing Joint statements of policy/action Joint statements of co-operation/ Statements of Common Ground. 3.5 These arrangements will be undertaken in addition to statutory Local Plan and planning application consultations, and general correspondence issued by the Council. Section 4 Key Issues identified 4.1 The following issues were identified from the representations submitted on the Issues and Options document. This feedback will be used to further develop planning policies on these matters as the plan progresses towards submission, independent examination and adoption. 4.2 Vision – there was broad agreement with the key messages of the Southend 2050 vision, but further emphasis was required on protecting and enhancing the environment, including combating climate change; providing supporting infrastructure; improving transport access in and around the Borough whilst boosting opportunities for more sustainable forms of travel; and balancing aspirations with what is deliverable, including provision of affordable housing. It was also considered to be important that Sustainability Appraisal of the plan takes into account any cross-boundary / cumulative effects of strategic scale development. 4.3 Spatial Options – Of the three spatial options presented, option 3 attracted the most support. Those supporting it viewed it as providing the best opportunity for accommodating the necessary growth. Opponents to this option cited the unacceptable loss of green belt land and the loss of open countryside between the current urban fringe and the internationally important estuarine habitats of the River Roach to the north. Those respondents favouring Option 1 focussed on the need to redevelopment brownfield sites, whilst those opposing it were concerned that further development in the existing built up area would worsen perceived over-crowding and high-density development. Those favouring Option 2 considered this to be the best compromise of the three options available, as it would promote use of brownfield land whilst allowing some expansion of the urban area where new residents could access existing facilities. Opposition to Option 2 came from those wishing to see the Green Belt protected and others who considered that this approach would not be sufficient to meet the Borough’s needs. 4.4 Housing – There was support for more affordable homes, although there is a need to set policy requirements carefully having regard to viability. New housing should be inclusive and adaptable for all people to support family cohesion and provide flexibility. Vacant and empty homes should be brought back into use and higher density development focussed close to town centres and public transport nodes, but there was an acknowledgement that densification is unlikely to deliver the required amount and mix of dwellings whilst maintaining a good quality of life for existing residents. A new garden community could enable a comprehensively and positively planned scheme. There was also a recognition of the need to provide the right type of housing to support the economic performance of the town, thus helping to reduce levels of deprivation. 4.5 Securing a Thriving Local Economy – Support for key sectors including digital, cultural and creative industries, health care, advanced manufacturing and engineering and tourism, and in protecting the main employment locations. Aviation and local fishing industry were also cited as in need of support through planning policy. Supporting economic growth with improvements in infrastructure (transport and digital) was also highlighted. Poorer quality employment sites could be considered for redevelopment providing it takes into account environmental factors and does not result in job losses. 4.6 Promoting Southend as a Major Resort – Should be borough wide, building on the Seafront offer, and providing opportunities for more than day trips. Better links between the Seafront and the High Street were required, along with provision of a range of tourist accommodation and leisure offer.
Recommended publications
  • 16 August 2018 Our Ref: 244199 Basildon Borough
    Date: 16 August 2018 Our ref: 244199 Basildon Borough Council Braintree District Council Customer Services Brentwood Borough Council Hornbeam House Castle Point Borough Council Crewe Business Park Electra Way Chelmsford Borough Council Crewe Colchester Borough Council Cheshire Maldon District Council CW1 6GJ Rochford District Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council T 0300 060 3900 Tendring District Council Thurrock Borough Council Uttlesford District Council Essex Place Services BY EMAIL ONLY Dear All Emerging strategic approach relating to the Essex Coast Recreational disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS) – Revised interim advice to ensure new residential development and any associated recreational disturbance impacts on European designated sites are compliant with the Habitats Regulations1 This letter provides Natural England’s revised interim advice further to that issued on 16th November 2017. This advice is provided to ensure that any residential planning applications coming forward ahead of the Essex Coast RAMS which have the potential to impact on coastal European designated sites are compliant with the Habitats Regulations. It specifically relates to additional recreational impacts that may occur on the interest features of the following European designated sites: Essex Estuaries Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Hamford Water Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site2 Stour and Orwell Estuaries SPA and Ramsar site (Stour on the Essex side only) Colne Estuary SPA and Ramsar site Blackwater Estuary SPA and Ramsar site Dengie SPA and Ramsar site Crouch and Roach Estuaries SPA and Ramsar site Foulness Estuary SPA and Ramsar site Benfleet and Southend Marshes SPA and Ramsar site Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA and Ramsar site (Essex side only) 1 Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, as amended (commonly known as the ‘Habitats Regulations’) 2 Listed or proposed Wetlands of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention (Ramsar) sites are protected as a matter of Government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • SWI 4 Southend-On-Sea to Wallasea Island England Coast Path Stretch
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Southend-on-Sea to Wallasea Island Report SWI 4: Sutton Ford Bridge to Paglesham Eastend Part 4.1: Introduction Start Point: Sutton Ford Bridge, Rochford (grid reference: TQ 8832 8963 ) End Point: Paglesham Eastend (grid reference TQ 9477 9212) Relevant Maps: SWI 4a to SWI 4f 4.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to this stretch of coast between Southend-on- Sea and Wallasea Island. 4.1.2 This report covers length SWI 4 of the stretch, which is the coast between Sutton Ford Bridge and Paglesham Eastend. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 4.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
    [Show full text]
  • Nos. 116 to 130)
    ESSEX SOCIETY FOR ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY (Founded as the Essex Archaeological Society in 1852) Digitisation Project ESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY NEWS DECEMBER 1992 TO AUTUMN/ WINTER 1999 (Nos. 116 to 130) 2014 ESAH REF: N1116130 Essex Archaeology and History News 0 December 1992 THE ESSEX SOCIETY FOR ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTOI~Y NEWSLETTER NUMBER 116 DECEMBER 1992 CONTENTS FROM THE PRESIDENT ............................ ... ....I 1993 PROGRAMME ..•...... ....... .. ...............•.. .2 SIR WILLIAM ADDISON ... .................... .........•2 VlC GRAY ..... ...... ..... ..... ........ .. .. .. ...... .4 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF TilE ESSEX COAST ..............•.. .....•4 ESSEX ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONGRESS: LOCAL HISTORY SYMPOSIUM .. .................... ...•.... .5 TilE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ESSEX TO AD 1500 .........•.........•... .5 NEW BOOKS ON ESSEX at DECEMBER 1992 ... ... .. ... ......•6 BOOK REVlEWS ....•. ..... .................. .........•6 RECENT PUBLICATIONS FROM THURROCK .. ........ ........... 7 SPY IN THE SKY ............................. •......... 7 COLCHESTER ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT ..•. ............... ...8 LIBRARY REPORT .... ......... ... .... .. ........ .......8 ESSEX JOURNAL ....... ............... .. ..... ........8 WARRIOR BURIAL FOUND AT STANWAY ..........................9 ENTENTE CORDIALE .................... ...........•......10 WORK OF THE TliE COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SECTION . .. ..........11 Editor: Paul Gilman 36 Rydal Way, Black Notley, Braintree, Essex, CM7 8UG Telephone: Braintree 331452 (home) Chelmsford 437636(work)
    [Show full text]
  • Artist Commission, Rochford Town 2019-20
    Artist Commission, Rochford Town 2019-20 Budget: £10,000 Deadline: Monday 27 May 2019 (1pm) Interviews: Friday 7 June 2019 Introduction For eleven years Essex Cultural Diversity Project (ECDP) has been working closely with many different organisations, bringing together artists, museums, libraries, performers and writers with local authorities and commissioners to significantly improve and enhance the artistic and cultural diversity of the area, ensure that excellence is thriving, and that cultural integration and understanding is supported and enhanced through arts and cultural activity. This is more important today than it has ever been since ECDP was established. ECDP is now an Arts Council National Portfolio Organisation (NPO) with a key role to play across Essex and the East of England in continuing to support diversity in arts and cultural practice. Our strategy to achieve this is through a programme of exciting but challenging place-based commissions for artists to work in areas of Essex where there are opportunities to explore diversity through their practice. For 2019- 20 we are focusing on rural or smaller areas/towns that do not tend to see a lot of artists commissioning or activity, particularly focusing on more diverse arts/cultural practice. This commission is to be focused on the historic town of Rochford in what is a largely rural District to the south east of Essex bordering the urban area of Southend-on-Sea. Rochford Town Introduction Rochford is the main town and administrative centre of the District of Rochford a largely rural area to the south east of Essex, bordering the urban Borough of Southend-on-Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Essex Estuaries
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Essex Estuaries Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • MAR 2014-84Pg.Indd
    THE ESSEX FAMILY HISTORIAN NUMBER 151 MARCH 2014 Old Map Flying low over Feering - David Elsdon The Essex Family Historian Journal of The Essex Society for Family History Published quarterly – March 2014, No. 151. International Standard Serial Number: 0140 7503 Member of the Federation of Family History Societies Registered Charity No. 290552 Regular features: EDITORIAL .........................................................4 BARBARA HARPIN’S NEWS ROUNDUP .....65 COUNTY CALENDAR A Diary of Events ........6 NEWS AND REVIEWS of Branch Meetings. ...75 THE CHAIRMAN ............................................45 MEMBERS’ SURNAME INTERESTS up to LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. ...........................46 and including 1st February, 2014 ......................85 Articles: LEGEND by Editorial Team .......................................................................................................................7 NOTORIOUS SMUGGLER by Editorial Team .....................................................................................10 A MISSION INDEED by Corinne Wheeler .............................................................................................11 A SCRAP OF PAPER by Editorial Team .................................................................................................13 OLD FOBBING by Gwen Brown .............................................................................................................17 PICTURE GALLERY .............................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI Kent
    Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI Kent Supporting Information Issued by Natural England’s Sussex and Kent Team on 11 March 2021 Page 1 of 36 Contact points and further information This supplement is issued on request by Natural England’s Kent and Sussex Team and is intended to be read in conjunction with the notification document for owners, occupiers and other notified parties. During the current coronavirus situation, Natural England staff are working remotely, and a limited number of our offices are open. Please send any correspondence relating to this notification by email or contact us by phone using the information below. Alternatively, you can send a response online using the link below. Your contact point for enquiries relating to this notification is Neil Fuller. Telephone number: 07900 227219 E-mail: [email protected] Online: https://consult.defra.gov.uk/natural-england/swanscombe-peninsula Page 2 of 36 Contents Summary 1. Information used to support the selection of Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI. 2. Explanation of how Swanscombe Peninsula meets the SSSI selection guidelines. 3. Assessment of the current condition of Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI. 4. Selection of ‘operations requiring Natural England’s consent’. 5. Photographs. Annex 1. Habitat Map. Annex 2. Map showing location of comparison sites listed in Table 3. Annex 3. Map showing location of comparison sites listed in Table 5. Annex 4. List of invertebrate species with Conservation Status recorded at Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI. Page 3 of 36 Summary Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI is notified under section 28C of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. The site is a complex of open mosaic habitats on previously developed land and traditional estuarine habitats located near and within the River Thames, Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roach Valley Way Is a Circular Walk Of
    The Roach Valley Way drain Althorne Creek The Cliff Black Point Bridgemarsh Island drain mud mud drain Lower Cliff Reach MHW MHW Raypit's Nature Reserve Raypits Reach Easter Reach MHW Lands mud mud End drain Tideways drain Upper Raypits drain drain Old Fleet Lower Raypits River Crouch A12 It is strongly recommended that Essex County Council supports the mud The Roach Valley Way Chelmsford A12 Maldon strong comfortable ankle supporting Countryside Code, which helps Pudsey drain Hall footwear is worn and take additional members of the public respect, is a circular walk of A414 bird hide Riverside Lion Creek Timber Pudsey Hall Lane waterproof and windproof clothing. protect and enjoy the countryside. Village Yard Nature Reserve Holiday twenty three miles around A130 Bolt A little foodButts Hilland waterpill box should be Park South Hall Follow the countryside code: Woodham Market Wallasea Ferrers provided for the journey. Burnham Hill Island south-east Essex leading on Crouch Lion Creek River Crouch Canewdon CANEWDON pill box Be safe, plan ahead and follow any Saltings Lion Camp FP Canewdon Poultry Creeksea Road Farm BeaconThe routeHall Farm is clearly signposted and Wharf ScaldhurstWickford Hockley Hill signs Farm FP PagleshamGlenesk New Hall Farm Rayleigh Mill you through a rich variety waymarked in both directions.Gays Lane Using B1013 Hatch Church High Street A127 Larkhill Ave FP FP River Roach Note: The gates to Leave gates and property as you findRaymonds Lion A130 FP Rochford this booklet should make your Farm Wades Basildon Benfleet A127 St Nicholas Church A House village The of landscapes from the are locked at dusk.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex Thames Gateway Water Cycle Study Scoping Study
    Essex Thames Gateway Essex Thames Gateway Water Cycle Study Scoping Study Final Report March 2009 Prepared for: Basildon District Council, Castle Point Borough Council, Rochford District Council, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council , Essex County Council Essex Thames Gateway Planning Authorities Water Cycle Study – Scoping Study Revision Schedule Essex Thames Gateway Water Cycle Study – Scoping Report March 2009 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 January 2009 Draft Scoping Mary Pyne Carl Pelling Jon Robinson Report Assistant Water Specialist Senior Consultant - Water Associate 02 March 2009 Final Scoping Mary Pyne Carl Pelling Jon Robinson report Assistant Water Specialist Senior Consultant - Water Associate Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's RG21 7PP appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the Tel: 01256 310200 purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Fax: 01256 310201 written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • HRA Appendix 1 European Site Characterisation
    London Southend Airport and Environs JAAP: Habitats Regulations Assessment European Site Characterisations Appendix I: European Site Characterisations Special Areas of Conservation 1. Essex Estuaries SAC Special Protection Areas 2. Benfleet and Southend Marshes SPA 3. Blackwater Estuary SPA 4. Crouch and Roach Estuaries SPA 5. Dengie SPA 6. Foulness SPA 7. Medway Estuary and Marshes SPA 8. Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA Ramsar Sites 9. Benfleet and Southend Marshes Ramsar 10. Blackwater Estuary Ramsar 11. Crouch and Roach Estuaries Ramsar 12. Dengie Ramsar 13. Foulness Ramsar 14. Medway Estuary and Marshes Ramsar 15. Thames Estuary and Marshes Ramsar January 2013 1 /55 enfusion London Southend Airport and Environs JAAP: Habitats Regulations Assessment European Site Characterisations Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Site Name: Essex Estuaries Habitats Regulations Assessment: Data Proforma Location Grid Ref: TM103048 JNCC Site Code: UK0013690 Size (ha): 46140.82 Designation: SAC Site Description This is a large estuarine site in south-east England, and is a typical, undeveloped, coastal plain estuarine system with associated open coast mudflats and sandbanks. The site comprises the major estuaries of the Colne, Blackwater, Crouch and Roach rivers and is important as an extensive area of contiguous estuarine habitat. Essex Estuaries contains a very wide range of characteristic marine and estuarine sediment communities and some diverse and unusual marine communities in the lower reaches, including rich sponge communities on mixed, tide-swept substrates. Sublittoral areas have a very rich invertebrate fauna, including the reef-building worm Sabellaria spinulosa, the brittlestar Ophiothrix fragilis, crustaceans and ascidians. The site also has large areas of saltmarsh and other important coastal habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • River Crouch Coastal Community Team Economic Plan – 31St January 2016 Version 1
    RIVER CROUCH COASTAL COMMUNITY TEAM ECONOMIC PLAN No. Heading Detail Information Key Information 1 Name of CCT N/A The River Crouch Coastal Community Team 2 Single Point of Name Kerry Martin Contact Economic Development Manager (SPOC) Address Maldon District Council Council Offices Princes Road Maldon Essex CM9 5DL Tel nos 01621 875846 Email [email protected] 3 (a) CCT Names and CCT Membership will be confirmed Membership position, e.g. subsequent to the initial Team meeting resident, Local Councillor 3 (b) CCT Other partners As above Membership and/or stakeholders to be involved. 4 Accountable Local Authority Maldon District Council Body Contact name & [email protected] details Does the Accountable Body have a representative on the CCT membership? YES 5 Local Area Provide brief The River Crouch downstream from geographical Battlesbridge on both banks of the river description of the down to and including Foulness Island and locality and a Paglesham on the southern bank and out to brief history if Holliwell Point on the northern bank and relevant. northwards to Asheldham Brook. Although there are 2 exceptions, (listed in 6) generally south of the river is within Rochford Local Authority and north is within Maldon Local Authority. Page 1 of 13 River Crouch Coastal Community Team Economic Plan – 31st January 2016 Version 1 6 Context – Description of On the northern bank the major town is community local community Burnham on Crouch (pop 7,671) and (suggested with neighbouring Southminster (4,272). maximum 300 demographics. Moving upstream is the village of North words) Fambridge (835) (all of the above are within Maldon District – MD) and the town of South Woodham Ferrers (SWF) (16,629).
    [Show full text]
  • Stambridge and Paglesham Workshop Presentation
    The Parish Council role in the planning process Parish Councils role in planning This goes beyond acting as the eyes and ears of your local communities; you can for example, influence decisions and policies that affect your area; develop neighbourhood/parish plans; assist in identifying potential sites for affordable housing; lead community engagement in implementation projects; and when reviewing planning applications, encourage close partnership working with the council to deliver local services which give the best deal for the community. Agenda 19:00 – 19:30 | Introduction to Stambridge and Paglesham 19:45 – 20:30 | Discussion and Map Session 20:30 – 21:00 | Looking to the future and the role of Stakeholders 3 How to deliver and understand local needs and ambitions What we want to know: What do you want? Where should it go? Where are your services? Do they need improvement? What about funding? What are the relationships and communication challenges? We want: Open and transparent communication Ongoing engagement What improvements could we make? Building relationships, miscommunications and their concerns Parish Map Stambridge/Paglesham Parish Statistics Stambridge Overview Total Population of the Parish is 700 • An increase from 696 in 2001 • Population density of 1.27 people per hectare (ppha), much lower than the Rochford average of 4.9 ppha The average age of a Stambridge resident is 43.5 years, higher than the national average of 39.3 years Between 2001 and 2011, the number of dwellings in the Parish has slightly
    [Show full text]