No. 15-1191 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States >> >> LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Petitioner, v. LUIS RAMON MORALES-SANTANA, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE SCHOLARS ON STATELESSNESS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT Max Gitter Counsel of Record Rishi Zutshi Eric Jordan CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP Counsel for Amici Curiae One Liberty Plaza New York, New York 10006 212-225-2000 October 3, 2016
[email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI .................................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ...................................... 9 ARGUMENT ................................................. 13 I. THERE WAS IN 1940 AND 1952—AND CONTINUES TO BE—A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF STATELESSNESS FOR FOREIGN-BORN CHILDREN OF UNMARRIED U.S. FATHERS .................................. 13 A. The Laws of Many Countries Created as of 1940 and 1952, and Still Create, a Risk of Statelessness for Foreign-Born, Non-Marital Children of U.S. Fathers................................ 14 B. The Presence of Large Numbers of Stateless Women Created in 1940 and 1952—and Creates Today—a Risk of Statelessness for Foreign-Born Non-Marital Children of U.S. Fathers ............ 23 ii Page C. The Sources Cited by the Government Do Not Support Its Argument that Non-Marital Children of U.S. Mothers Were or Are at “Greater Risk” of Statelessness............................... 24 II. THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT SUPPORT THE GOVERNMENT’S IMPUTATION TO CONGRESS THAT IT ENACTED THE 1952 AMENDMENT WITH THE “SPECIFIC INTENT” TO REDUCE THE RISK THAT A CHILD BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK ABROAD TO A U.S.-CITIZEN MOTHER WOULD BE BORN STATELESS .....