DOCSLIB.ORG

Annotated Agenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annotated Agenda Annotated Agenda FIRST PLENARY SESSION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE FOR THE SAFEGUARDING OF AFGHANISTAN’S CULTURAL HERITAGE 16-18 June 2003 UNESCO Headquarters, Paris Bonvin building 1, rue Miollis 75015 Paris Room XIII Peace and stability are at last in sight for the Afghan people. While areas of insecurity and volatility still remain, the opportunity to rally the international community to support a coordinated relief, recovery, rehabilitation, return and reintegration effort is unique and must be seized. It is now vital that immediate steps are taken to promote a return to normal life and stability and to prepare for longer-term development. In this context, the safeguarding of all aspects of cultural heritage, both tangible and intangible, including museums, monuments, archeological sites, music, art, traditional crafts etc. holds an important position in order to strengthen the sense of national integrity. Cultural heritage can become a rallying point for former adversaries, enabling them to re-build ties and dialogue and re-design a common identity and future together. UNESCO’s strategy is to help re-establish the links between the populations concerned and their cultural history, helping them to develop a sense of common ownership of monuments that represent the cultural identity of different segments of society. It is therefore directly linked to the nation-building process within the framework of the UN and international concerted efforts for rehabilitating Afghanistan. With reference to UN Secretary-General’s dictum “Our challenge is to help the Afghans help themselves," policies and activities for the safeguarding of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage will focus on training and capacity building activities, related to the preservation of this cultural heritage. In addition, following the Government of Afghanistan’s request to UNESCO to coordinate all international efforts in the field of culture, the International Coordination Committee for the Safeguarding of Afghanistan’s Cultural Heritage is being created under the auspices of UNESCO. The Committee’s advice will enable the Afghan authorities to develop a cultural policy framework for immediate and long-term heritage protection. The mandate of this Committee as defined in its Statutes as approved by UNESCO’s Executive Board at is 165th meeting in October 2002, is to “advise the Director-General – who 1 will inform the Afghan authorities, Member States and other partners – on measures to improve and reinforce international cooperation for the safeguarding of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage, and more precisely on: (a) a policy framework for immediate and long-term heritage protection and the definition of priorities and practical standards according to the funds and technical assistance available or forthcoming in the near future; (b) concrete programmes and international assistance of the highest international standards; (c) the progress of the various activities in support of the safeguarding of Afghan cultural heritage in order to avoid duplication or conflicts of any kind; (d) the exchange of knowledge on cultural sites, museums and cultural traditions throughout the country; (e) identification of the funds available from the donor countries and other partners in order to ensure their proper coordination, as well as identification of possible supplementary funding and technical assistance for the safeguarding of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage; (f) assistance to the Afghan authorities in implementing or elaborating the necessary legislative action to protect their cultural heritage and in preparing nominations of potential world heritage properties for inscription on the World Heritage List.” The Committee is invited, as it considers the various items on the agenda of this meeting, to bear in mind the above tasks and draw up conclusions and recommendations in response thereto. 2 Monday, 16 June 2003 9:30-10.45h Opening Session 9.30h Statements by : ?? Dr Makhdoum RAHEEN, Minister of Information and Culture of the Afghan Transitional Government ?? Mr Koïchiro MATSUURA, Director-General of UNESCO; ?? Dr G. R. YUSUFZAI, Deputy Minister for Culture of the Afghan Transitional Government and Chairperson of the “National Council for the Protection and Rehabilitation of Afghanistan’s Cultural Heritage”; ?? Dr Tamás FEJÉRDY, Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee. 10.15 h Adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the ICC and election of four Vice Chairpersons and a Rapporteur While the Chairperson of the Committee is appointed by the Director-General for a period of four years (Article 4.1. of the Statutes of the ICC), the Committee shall elect four Vice- Chairpersons and a Rapporteur for the same term (Articles 4.1. and 4.2. of the Statutes and Article 2 of the Rules of Procedure of the ICC). 10.45-13.30h Session 1: Capacity building, archaeological research and conservation activities of various donor countries and organizations Background: Archaeological research and capacity-building activities are presently being organized by the French Archaeological Mission to Afghanistan, the Istituto per l'Africa e l'Oriente and the German Archaeological Institute at many cultural sites and institutions in Afghanistan. Various donor countries and organizations, such as the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, are also preparing or already carrying out conservation activities. Expected result: Different activities and their progress coordinated in order to avoid duplication. Interventions by: ?? Mr Roland BESENVAL, Head of the French Archaeological Mission to Afghanistan (DAFA), on DAFA activities, namely in Balkh, Ai Khanum, Kabul and Bamiyan; ?? Professor Giovanni VERARDI, Istituto per l'Africa e l’Oriente, on Italy’s conservation projects, in particular in Ghazni; ?? Professor Dr Hermann PARZINGER, President of the German Archaeological Institute, on institutional capacity building for archaeological institutions in Afghanistan and the rehabilitation of the Bagh-e Babur Gardens; ?? Professor Michael PETZET, President of ICOMOS, on projects for restoration and reconstruction of houses in traditional materials in Kabul and the rehabilitation of Bagh-e Babur Gardens; ?? Mr Jolyon LESLIE, Aga Khan Trust for Culture, on Aga Khan Trust for Culture’s activities in Afghanistan, namely conservation of traditional housing and the Bagh-e Babur Gardens; 3 ?? Dr Rasoul VATANDOUST, Director of Research Centre for Conservation of Cultural Relics and Head of Department for Cultural and International Relations of the Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization, on Iranian conservation projects, mainly for Islamic monuments and training for Afghan specialists; ?? Ms Nancy HATCH-DUPREE, founding member of SPACH, on SPACH’s projects in Afghanistan; ?? Mr Michael K. TRIMBLE, Chief, Curation and Archives Analysis Brand, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, on a possible contribution of the United States for the rehabilitation of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage Discussion 13.30- 15.00 h Lunch 15-18 h Session 2: Implementation of the World Heritage Convention and the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, National Inventories and documentation Background: The World Heritage Convention is being implemented in Afghanistan through capacity-building activities for establishing Tentative Lists, nominating new properties for inscription on the World Heritage List, and enhancing conservation, management and presentation of World Heritage or potential World Heritage properties in Afghanistan. Illicit traffic of cultural property is a problem that needs to be solved as soon as possible. The continuing and systematic looting of cultural heritage properties in Afghanistan, in particular from well-known archaeological sites that have been researched in the past by national and international scholars, has to be stopped. To this aim, inventories need to be strengthened and especially the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, shall be ratified and implemented. The re-establishment of the national inventory of heritage properties and movable objects, the mobilization of international support for compiling records and documentation, and rebuilding of resources are urgent needs which were underscored in the recommendations of the Kabul Seminar. Expected results: International cooperation for the implementation of the Conventions improved, recommendations on measures for the prevention of illicit traffic obtained and highest international standards for the National Inventories and documentation ensured. Interventions by: ?? Dr Tamás FEJÉRDY, Chairperson of the World Heritage Committee, and Ms Junko TANIGUCHI, World Heritage Centre, on the implementation of the World Heritage Convention in Afghanistan; ?? Mr Abdul Wasey FEROOZI, Head of the Institute of Archaeology, Afghan Ministry of Information and Culture, on National Inventories and documentation; ?? Mr Guido CARDUCCI, UNESCO, Chief of International Standards Section, Division of Cultural Heritage, on legislative and concrete actions to be taken to prevent illicit traffic of cultural property; ?? Professor Giovanni VERARDI, Istituto per l'Africa e l'Oriente, Mr Roland BESENVAL, Head of the French Archaeological Mission to Afghanistan, and 4 Professor Dr Hermann PARZINGER, President of the German Archaeological Institute, on priorities and practical standards for archaeological documentation;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Apsidal Temple of Taxila
    T HE THE APSIDAL TEMPLE OF TAXILA: A TRADITIONAL HYPOTHESIS AND PSIDA L POSSIBLE NEW INTERPRETATIONS T EMP L E Luca Colliva O F T AXI L A The so called ‘apsidal temple’ of Sirkap is an imposing building belonging, according to Marshall, : T RADI to the Indo-Parthian period (Figure 1) (Marshall 1951, 150-151). It is built over an artificial terrace T facing the main street in the northern part of the town and was brought to light by John Marshall at IONA th the beginning of the last century after some minor excavations during the 19 century. Unlike his L H predecessors, who were very doubtful about its nature (Cunningham 1871, 126-128), Marshall identified YPO T this building as a Buddhist gr. ha-stūpa (Marshall 1930, 111; Marshall 1951, 150); this interpretation HESIS has indeed never been questioned and is accepted, also, in the last study on urban form in Taxila A (Coningham & Edwards 1998, 50). ND However, we cannot deem this attribution certain. No traces are detectable of the main stūpa P OSSIB Marshall recognises in the ‘circular room’ (Marshall 1951, 151). Besides, what Marshall describes as L E two additional stūpas are nothing but scanty remains of foundations belonging to two monuments N of uncertain nature. As I already pointed out in a more exhaustive way (Colliva in press), Marshall EW I was probably convinced that the apsidal shape of this building was enough to identify it as a N T Buddhist caitya. The discovery at Sonkh of an apsidal-shaped temple, probably dedicated to a nāga ERPRE cult, shows, on the contrary, that non-Buddhist religious buildings with an apsidal plan occur in T A T periods chronologically consistent with that of the “apsidal temple” of Sirkap (Härtel 1970; Härtel IONS 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • KURENAI : Kyoto University Research Information Repository
    KURENAI : Kyoto University Research Information Repository Buddhism in North-western India and Eastern Afghanistan, Title Sixth to Ninth Century AD Author(s) VERARDI, Giovanni Citation ZINBUN (2012), 43: 147-183 Issue Date 2012-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/155685 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University ZINBUN 2011 No.43 Buddhism in North-western India and Eastern Afghanistan, Sixth to Ninth Century AD Giovanni VERARDI North-western India (Maps 1–3) enjoys of, or rather suffers from a peculiar situation in the fi eld of Buddhist and Indian studies. The art of Gandhāra started being known in the second half of the nineteenth century, 1 and soon became the privileged fi eld of research of western scholars. When in 1905 Alfred Foucher published the fi rst volume of L’art gréco- bouddhique du Gandhâra, Gandhāra had already been removed from the body of India as a region apart, despite the fact that Gandhāran Buddhism was construed as a paradigm not only of Buddhist art, but of Buddhism tout court, and Buddhism was obviously part of Indian history. In the early decades of the last century, Indian scholars (who were not sim- ply the babus who provided western scholars with texts and translations, but independent minds deeply involved in the debate on Indian past)2 preferred, with the exception of Bengali intellectuals, to stay away from anything related to Buddhism, a religion that their ancestors had actively opposed.3 Their alienation with regard a ‘Greek’ Buddhism was obviously even greater. The fact that Foucher’s book was written in French further estranged them from the fi eld of Gandhāran studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese-Italian Archaeological Mission to Longmen, Pp
    Abstracts, Newsletter di Archeologia CISA, Volume 1, 2010 Bard, K. and Fattovich, R., Mersa/Wadi Gawais 2009-2010, pp. 7-35 In December 2009-January 2010 the Archaeological Expedition of Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” (UNO), and the Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente (IsIAO), Rome, in collaboration with Boston University (BU), Boston (USA) conducted the 9th field season at the site of Mersa/Wadi Gawasis, Red Sea, under the direction of Prof. Rodolfo Fattovich (UNO/IsIAO), and Prof. Kathryn A. Bard (BU). The team in the field included Italian, American, Egyptian, British, and German personnel with different specializations (archaeology, nautical archaeology, epigraphy, geology, paleoethnobotany and topography). The site of Mersa/Wadi Gawasis is located 23 km to the south of the modern port of Safaga, on the top and along the slopes of a fossil coral terrace, to the west of which is the lower Wadi Gawasis. Earlier excavations along the western slope of the terrace provided good evidence of the use of Mersa Gawasis as the pharaonic harbor for voyages to Punt in the Middle Kingdom and the early New Kingdom. In 2009-2010 fieldwork at Mersa/Wadi Gawasis included geological and archaeological investigations, mapping, laser-scanner surveying and conservation. Geological investigations were conducted in the wadi bed and confirmed the hypothesis that the lower Wadi Gawasis was originally a lagoon with an open channel to the sea. Archaeological excavations were conducted along and at the base of the western slope of the coral terrace and in the “harbor area” at the base of the southwestern slope of the terrace.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Buddhism in North-Western India and Eastern Afghanistan
    Buddhism in North-western India and Eastern Afghanistan, Title Sixth to Ninth Century AD Author(s) VERARDI, Giovanni Citation ZINBUN (2012), 43: 147-183 Issue Date 2012-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/155685 © Copyright March 2012, Institute for Research in Humanities Right Kyoto University. Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University ZINBUN 2011 No.43 Buddhism in North-western India and Eastern Afghanistan, Sixth to Ninth Century AD Giovanni VERARDI North-western India (Maps 1–3) enjoys of, or rather suffers from a peculiar situation in the fi eld of Buddhist and Indian studies. The art of Gandhāra started being known in the second half of the nineteenth century, 1 and soon became the privileged fi eld of research of western scholars. When in 1905 Alfred Foucher published the fi rst volume of L’art gréco- bouddhique du Gandhâra, Gandhāra had already been removed from the body of India as a region apart, despite the fact that Gandhāran Buddhism was construed as a paradigm not only of Buddhist art, but of Buddhism tout court, and Buddhism was obviously part of Indian history. In the early decades of the last century, Indian scholars (who were not sim- ply the babus who provided western scholars with texts and translations, but independent minds deeply involved in the debate on Indian past)2 preferred, with the exception of Bengali intellectuals, to stay away from anything related to Buddhism, a religion that their ancestors had actively opposed.3 Their alienation with regard a ‘Greek’ Buddhism was obviously even greater. The fact that Foucher’s book was written in French further estranged them from the fi eld of Gandhāran studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Unanswered Questions of Afghan Archaeology
    R ECLAIMING A FGHANISTAN’ S P AST 1 2 Unanswered Questions of the heartland of this civilization, which sprawled across the vast 3 Asian steppes and has echoes as far away as Susa in western Iran 4 Afghan Archaeology and in the northwest of China. 5 The Soviet invasion in 1978 put an abrupt brake on many promis- • In eastern Afghanistan near Harwa, looters have uncovered rich 6 ing lines of inquiry in Afghanistan. Here are a few of the areas re- sites dating from the Buddhist kingdoms in the early centuries A.D. 7 searchers hope to revisit with their new access: Border guards recently intercepted a host of Buddhist objects from 8 • At the time of the Soviet invasion, Viktor Sarianidi of Moscow’s the 2nd to 5th centuries A.D., and their source was traced to a remote 9 Institute of Archaeology, among others, had just found intriguing ev- part of Logar Province southeast of Kabul. Earlier this fall, archaeolo- 10 idence of substantial settlements in the coun- gist Giovanni Verardi of the University of Rome visited the site, which 11 try’s north, near the Amu Darya River— he says is full of imposing and well-preserved two-story buildings, 12 the ancient Oxus—during the 3rd mil- towers, and sacred precincts. Although looters—who some officials 13 lennium B.C. Further digging in say were working with the blessing of the Taliban—have dug pas- 14 Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan re- sageways through the mound, causing extensive damage,Verardi says 15 vealed similar patterns. When that much remains to be excavated.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping History Alive Safeguarding Cultural Heritage in Post-Conflict Afghanistan Cultural Heritage Safeguarding
    Over the last ten years, UNESCO and its partners have actively supported the efforts of the Afghan Government, notably the Ministry of Information and Culture, to increase public awareness of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage. This has been undertaken not only through the United Nations practical conservation and stabilisation work at historic monuments Educational, Scientific and and archaeological sites, but also in the form of numerous publications, Cultural Organization Safeguarding Cultural Heritage in Post Conflict Afghanistan Safeguarding Keeping History Alive seminars, workshops and other international, national and provincial cultural events. These endeavours have looked to highlight the significance and contribution of culture towards broader development goals including employment, income generation, education and the promotion of a cohesive society within the context of peace and nation- building in Afghanistan. Keeping History Alive Safeguarding Cultural Heritage in Post-Conflict Afghanistan United Nations Educational, Scientific and Raw photos from 3D scanning of the Gawharshad Mausoleum ceiling in Herat Cultural Organization © UNESCO/ICONEM Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and UNESCO Office in Kabul, House 647, Jami Watt, PD-10, Shahr-e Naw, Kabul, Afghanistan © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100064-5 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-ND 3.0 IGO) license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbynd-en).
    [Show full text]
  • Harships and Downfall by Giovanni Verardi.Indd
    HARDSHIPS AND DOWNFALL OF BUDDHISM IN INDIA Nalanda-Sriwijaya Series General Editors: Tansen Sen and Geoff Wade The Nalanda-Sriwijaya Series, established under the publications program of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, has been created as a publications avenue for the Nalanda-Sriwijaya Centre. The Centre focusses on the ways in which Asian polities and societies have interacted over time. To this end, the series invites submissions which engage with Asian historical connectivities. Such works might examine political relations between states; the trading, financial and other networks which connected regions; cultural, linguistic and intellectual interactions between societies; or religious links across and between large parts of Asia. 1. Nagapattinam to Suvarnadwipa: Reflections on the Chola Naval Expeditions to Southeast Asia, edited by Hermann Kulke, K. Kesavapany and Vijay Sakhuja 2. Early Interactions between South and Southeast Asia: Reflections on Cross-Cultural Exchange, edited by Pierre-Yves Manguin, A. Mani and Geoff Wade 3. Anthony Reid and the Study of the Southeast Asian Past, edited by Geoff Wade and Li Tana The Institute of Southeast Asia Studies (ISEAS) was established as an autonomous organisation in 1968. It is a regional centre dedicated to the study of socio-political, security and economic trends and developments in Southeast Asia and its wider geostrategic and economic environment. The Institute’s research programmes are the Regional Economic Studies (RES, including ASEAN and APEC), Regional Strategic and Political Studies (RSPS), and Regional Social and Cultural Studies (RSCS). ISEAS Publishing, an established academic press, has issued more than 2,000 books and journals. It is the largest scholarly publisher of research about Southeast Asia from within the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies
    VOLUME 10 (MAY 2016) ISSN: 2047-1076 Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies The Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies A Recognised Independent http://www.ocbs.org Centre of the University of Oxford JOURNAL OF THE OXFORD CENTRE FOR BUDDHIST STUDIES volume 10 May 2016 Journal of the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies Volume 10 May 2016 ISSN: 2047-1076 Published by the Oxford Centre for Buddhist Studies www.ocbs.org Wolfson College, Linton Road, Oxford, OX2 6UD, United Kingdom Authors retain copyright of their articles. Editorial board Prof. Richard Gombrich (General Editor): [email protected] Prof. John Holder: [email protected] Dr Tse-fu Kuan: [email protected] Dr Alex Wynne: [email protected] All submissions should be sent to: [email protected] Production team Operations and Development Manager: Steven Egan Production Manager: Dr Tomoyuki Kono Development Consultant: Dr Paola Tinti Journal production by ww.ivancious.com Annual subscription rates Students: £20 Individuals: £30 Institutions: £45 Universities: £55 Countries from the following list receive 50% discount on all the above prices: Bangladesh, Burma, Laos, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, all African Countries For more information on subscriptions, please go to www.ocbs.org Contents Contents 4 List of Contributors 6 Editorial. Richard Gombrich 8 Levitation in Early Buddhist Discourse Bhikkhu Anālayo 11 A comparison of the Chinese and Pāli versions of the Śāriputra Saṃyukta, a collection of early Buddhist discourses on the Venerable Śāriputra Choong Mun-Keat 27 Beings, Non-Beings, and Buddhas: Contrasting Notions of tathāgatagarbha in the Anūnatvāpūrṇatvanirdeśaparivarta and *Mahābherī Sūtra C.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the Social Context of Archaeology Matters in the Study of the Indus Valley Civilization: Insight on Banerji’S “Pre‐Buddhist” Period at Mohenjodaro
    Why the Social Context of Archaeology Matters in the Study of the Indus Valley Civilization: Insight on Banerji’s “Pre‐Buddhist” Period at Mohenjodaro Neha Gupta 1 1. Anthropology and Geography/Interdisciplinary Studies, Lakehead University, 500 University Ave, Orillia, Ontario, L3V0B9, Canada (Email: nguptag@ gmail.com) Received: 25 September 2013; Accepted: 10 October 2013; Revised: 24 October 2013 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 1 (2013): 36‐62 Abstract: Most scholars agree that the Indian middle‐class is deeply interested in the Indus Valley civilization; a situation best reflected in popular publications within India on the ancient society. Furthermore, growing numbers of archaeologists, Indian and Western, remark that Indian archaeology is nationalistic. What does this mean for the study of the Indus Valley civilization, and, how does the relationship between Indian society and archaeology influence our understandings of ancient India? In this article, I use historical methods to examine the social context of archaeology with focus on the archaeological work of Rakhaldas Banerji at Mohenjodaro in the early twentieth century. I show how British scholars interpreted Indian archaeology to justify colonialism, and how Indian scholars, in turn, reinterpreted these views to challenge imperialism in colonial India. Keywords: History of Archaeology, Archaeology of India, Indus Valley Civilization, Rakhaldas Banerji, History of Science, Colonial Science, Cultural Heritage Introduction In their article entitled, “Basic Issues in Harappan Archaeology: Some Thoughts” (2006), Vasant Shinde, an archaeologist at the Deccan College Post‐Graduate and Research Institute, and his colleagues underscore the role of archaeology in contemporary Indian society. Although they do not say so explicitly, Shinde et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Data Collection by GPS and Analysis on GIS in the Greater Lumbini
    The 15th Science council of Asia Conference and international synposium The Study on Data Collection by GPS and Analysis on GIS in the Greater Lumbini Tomoko Mori1*, Takefumi Kurose2, Yukio Nishimura1 1 Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN. 2 Graduate School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN. Abstract: Lumbini, the birthplace of Lord Buddha, is one of four Buddhist’s major holy sites as well as World Heritage Sites. Tilaurakot, the archaeological remains of ancient Shakya Kingdom, Ramagrama, the only undisturbed original stupa of his relics, and other known/potential archaeological sites are in “the greater Lumbini”. The UNESCO project, “Strengthening Conservation and Management of Lumbini”, clarified “preservation and management of the World Heritage property of Lumbini can only be successful if the preservation and management challenges of the cultural landscape and sites that surround the property are addressed at the same time.” Stretching out the scope to the Greater Lumbini, we try to identify and evaluate sub-surface archaeological sequences by mapping, carried out with the assistance from national survey institute and local archaeologists. The results not only have the potential to stimulate the site analysis but can also contribute to debates on the role of archaeology in the promotion of tourism and sustainable regional development. This paper will reference it by GPS and GIS in order to illustrate the benefits of utilizing the contribution of S&T to Culture Preservation. Keywords: Conservation Planning, GIS (Geographic Information System), GPS (Global Positioning System), Archaeological sites, Lumbini 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buddhist Site of Ka Fir Kot, Kharwar (Afghanistan)
    ... •',, ."-\ ..)' ~ ...- .. Giovanni Verardi The Buddhist Site of Ka fir Kot, Kharwar (Afghanistan) - Position - Narrative - The Site The To,vn T/;c Fortress The Sacred Area The Si:ulpiltreS - Historical - References 1('. ,~; '.,</ll,·~ \-:.S'-l •. Kafir Kot ('The mound of the Infidels', a common toponym in eastern Af­ ghanistan and Pakistan to indicate the ruins of former Buddhist or Hindu settlements) is situated along the uppermost course of the river Charkh, a tributary of the Logar nver, m the secluded plateau of Kharwar (33°40' 06 N, 68°57'/58' E, at 2500 m above sea level) in the Govematorate of Lo gar, SE Afghanistan (Figs. 1-2). Fig. 1 - Kafir Kot in Southeastern Afghanistan. ' ... - .. 0 • ·~ .. J ',.. ": . ..-·~ - "r·;'' ·;,,•·;.;;•! · "'~' ~~:'.,.:-~-~~•~.t~::::~...~-~~~-t~~~7~:7·T·!~:-,:.:~~::~·~·.~·::7""_~~·7'_~·· .:.__.,~·'°'~;.:_.~:_.•r;T ~~ ",A.• ....-,· ;·-' · · .. .. ---:-- ......... ....:.: V Fig. 2 - Kafir Kot in K.harwar plateau, Logar Province. The site lies at a very short distance from the seat of the Vice-Govematorate of Kharwar. The plateau, swept by strong winds, is rich of water, which makes irri­ gation and cultivation possible. It is exclusively inhabited by Pathans, about 60.000 people scattered in very small villages and isolated qa/as (Fig.3 ). •. ·~.d~'t~ltt~·-~~~~--.-;....-..,~~.:1"....·"~"-.,·- ,,.,__._...,,,", .~.. ;1 " . Fig. 3 - Jawzay village in Kharwar plateau seen from Kafir Kot. The easiest route to reach Kharwar from Kabul is from the metalled road leading to Pul-e Alam, the capital town of Logar, and to. Gardez. You tum nght at Altamur, from where it is easy to reach the pass of Khwaja Angurak and the archaeo­ logical site.
    [Show full text]
  • Situated 13 Km S of Luoyang, the Longmen Gorge
    MARCO GUGLIELMINOTTI TRIVEL Archaeological Evidence from the ‘Buddhist Period’ in the Longmen Area Situated 13 km S of Luoyang, the Longmen gorge (N 34°33’ / E 112°28’) is renowned for its large complex of Buddhist caves, hewn out of two lime- stone cliffs facing the Yi river 伊水 (pl. I) between the end of the 5th and the end of the 11th century. The river flows northward through the defile, from the southern Yichuan 伊川 plain and toward the Luoyang basin to the north. The gorge is located at the easternmost end of the Qinling 秦岭 range, which is the natural border of the Luoyang territory to the S – the Xishan 西山 (Western Mountain) or Longmenshan 龍門山 (Longmen Mountain) to the W (307.6 m asl) and the Dongshan 東山 (Eastern Mountain) or Xiangshan 香山 (Perfumed Mountain) to the E (371.8 m asl). Over the past decades, other sites have been discovered in this area, especially near the caves, but few of them have been the object of systematic investigation. A notable exception is the excavation of the Fengxiansi 奉先寺 Monastery, located at the southern feet of the Xishan, carried out by a Chinese-Italian team (pl. II).1 This paper aims to present archaeological evidence from the monastic set- tlements of the Longmen area in a chronological order. Our discussion will be limited to evidence from the ‘Buddhist’ period, comprising the period from the 6th century to the Tang apogee of the 7th and 8th centuries and the slow decline of the 9th-11th centuries. Due to the fragmentary nature of materials, ———— 1 The project, directed by Giovanni Verardi and Liu Jinglong, was started in 1997 by Naples University ‘L’Orientale’ in collaboration with IsIAO (Rome), the Longmen Grottoes Academy and other archaeological institutions in Luoyang.
    [Show full text]