DOCSLIB.ORG

Limestone Hawksbeard (Crepis Intermedia A. Gray)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Limestone Hawksbeard (Crepis Intermedia A. Gray) LIMESTONE HAWKSBEARD Crepis intermedia A. Gray Asteraceae – Aster family Corey L. Gucker and Nancy L. Shaw | 2020 ORGANIZATION NOMENCLATURE Limestone hawksbeard (Crepis intermedia A. Names, subtaxa, chromosome number(s), hybridization. Gray), belongs to the Asteraceae family and the Psilochaenia section of the Crepis genus (Bogler 2006; Enke 2009). Nomenclature in this review follows Bogler (2006). Range, habitat, plant associations, elevation, soils. NRCS Plant Code. CRIN4 (USDA NRCS 2019). Subtaxa. Crepis intermedia Nuttall var. intermedia (A. Gray) Jepson. Life form, morphology, distinguishing characteristics, reproduction. Synonym. Psilochenia intermedia (A. Gray) W.A. Common Names. Limestone hawksbeard, gray Growth rate, successional status, disturbance ecology, importance to hawksbeard, small-flower hawksbeard (USDA FS animals/people. 1937; Bogler 2006; Welsh et al. 2016; Hitchcock and Cronquist 2018). Current or potential uses in restoration. Chromosome Number. Chromosome numbers are: 2n = 33, 44, 55, 88 (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Bogler 2006). Seed sourcing, wildland seed collection, seed cleaning, storage, Hybridization. Limestone hawksbeard is a testing and marketing standards. polyploid species that resulted from hybrid combinations involving two or three of the following hawksbeard species (Crepis spp.): Recommendations/guidelines for producing seed. tapertip hawksbeard (C. acuminata), largeflower hawksbeard (C. occidentalis), slender hawksbeard (C. exilis), Modoc hawksbeard (C. modocensis), or nakedstem hawksbeard (C. pleurocarpa) Recommendations/guidelines for producing planting stock. (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Cronquist et al. 1994). Ongoing gene flow and intergradations are reported in areas where limestone hawksbeard occurs with any of the aforementioned Recommendations/guidelines, wildland restoration successes/ failures. hawskbeards or bearded hawksbeard (C. barbigera) (Breitung 1957; Whitton et al. 2008). Primary funding sources, chapter reviewers. DISTRIBUTION Bibliography. Limestone hawksbeard is a western species occurring in southern British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and south to northern New Mexico, Arizona, and central California (Bogler 2006; Select tools, papers, and manuals cited. USDA NRCS 2019). It occurs primarily east of the Cascade Mountains in the Pacific Northwest Crepis intermedia A. Gray Crepis intermedia A. Gray. 1 (Hitchcock and Cronquist 2018). Populations are (A. tridentata subsp. tridentata) shrublands most abundant in northern California and southern occurring from 2,500 to 2,900 feet (760- Oregon, becoming local and infrequent eastward 880 m) in the Glass Mountain region of Mono (Babcock and Stebbins 1938). County, California (Horner 2001). In vegetation descriptions of south-central Nevada, including In a study that coupled herbarium records and the Nevada Test Site, limestone hawksbeard ecological niche modelling to describe the occupied an elevation range of 6,000-8,500 feet suitable climates for Great Basin forb species, (1,800-2,600 m). It occurred in singleleaf pinyon- increasing summer precipitation had a negative Utah juniper/big sagebrush (P. monophylla-J. effect on the potential climate suitability for osteosperma/A. tridentata) and curl-leaf mountain limestone hawksbeard in western sagebrush mahogany (Cercocarpus ledifolius)/big sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems (Barga et al. 2018). communities and white fir (Abies concolor) forests Habitat and Plant Associations. Limestone (Beatley 1976). hawksbeard is one of the more widely distributed Elevation. The elevation range for limestone hawksbeard species (Babcock and Stebbins hawksbeard is 1,500 to 12,800 feet (460-3,900 m) 1938). Because it exhibits characteristics of its (Munz and Keck 1973; Bogler 2006). In Utah it is parent species, it is preadpated to changing 5,000 to 8,450 feet (1,525-2,575 m) (Welsh et al. conditions and capable of colonizing new habitats. 2016), and in California it is 1,500 to 10,500 feet In some parts of its range, this process is (460-3,200 m) (Munz and Keck 1973). considered aggressive. Although most common on arid, well-drained slopes at the lower edge of Soils. Populations are often associated with the ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in well-drained, stony soils (USDA FS 1937), but bunchgrass and sagebrush communities (Figs. 1 texture and parent material can vary. Limestone and 2), limestone hawksbeard has ascended hawksbeard occurred in serpentine soils in the higher into the glaciated valleys of the central Wentachee and Blue Mountains of Washington Sierra Nevada Mountains than any other and Oregon (Babcock and Stebbins 1938). In hawksbeard (Babcock and Stebbins 1938). California’s Lassen County, populations occupied heavy clay loams near Susanville and light clay loams near Horse Lake. Soils at both sites were nearly neutral with pH of 6.6 to 6.8. In the Sierra Nevada Mountains, limestone hawksbeard was frequent in basaltic and granitic soils (Babcock and Stebbins 1938). Although more common at lower elevations, limestone hawksbeard is found in the bristlecone pine (Pinus aristata) zone (9,500-10,000 ft [2,900- 3,000 m]) of the White Mountains in California. In this area, limestone hawksbeard was restricted to sandstone substrates and did not occur on dolomite or granite (Table 1). Sandstone soils Figure 1. Limestone hawksbeard growing in a big sagebrush/ had greater clay and available moisture and were grassland community in Utah. Photo: US Forest Service, closer to neutral pH than the dolomite and granite Rocky Mountain Research Station, Provo Shrub Sciences soils. Average annual precipitation in the study Laboratory (USFS RMRS PSSL). area from 1953 to 1962 was 12.5 inches (318 mm) (Wright and Mooney 1965). Limestone hawksbeard occupies rocky ridges, dry slopes, and open forests throughout its Table 1. Soil characteristics of three substrates in the range. Common plant associates include bristlecone pine zone of the White Mountains in California. Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda), wheatgrasses Limestone hawksbeard was restricted to sandstone soils (Elymus and Pseudoroegneria spp.), buckwheat (Wright and Mooney 1965). (Eriogonum spp.), lupine (Lupinus spp.), arrowleaf balsamroot (Balsamorhiza sagitatta), sagebrush, Soil characteristics Sandstone Dolomite Granite pinyon (Pinus spp.), juniper (Juniperus spp.), oak Sand (%) 63 64 82 (Quercus spp.), and mixed conifers (Standley 1921; Silt (%) 33 34 15 USDA FS 1937; Munz and Keck 1973; Bogler 2006; Lesica 2012; Welsh et al. 2016). Clay (%) 4 2 3 Avail moisture (%) 25 20 16 Limestone hawksbeard was described as pH 6 8 6 common and showy in dry basin big sagebrush 2 Crepis intermedia A. Gray In the Jackson Hole region of Wyoming, limestone hawksbeard was common in big sagebrush communities. Soils in these communities had about 1 inch (2.5 cm) of litter accumulation, an A horizon of fine sandy loam, which was about 3 inches deep (8 cm), followed by a thin B horizon of coarse sandy loam. Beneath the A and B horizons was a very coarse gravelly and stony mass of parent till 10 feet (3 m) or more deep (Reed 1952). Figure 3. Robust limestone hawksbeard plant growing in Utah. Photo: USFS RMRS PSSL. Figure 2. Limestone hawksbeard growing in a big sagebrush community in Utah. Photo: USFS RMRS PSSL. DESCRIPTION Limestone hawksbeard is a perennial from a slender to stout taproot and simple to branched caudex (Fig. 3) (Bogler 2006). The caudex, covered by dead basal leaves, gives rise to one or two erect, 10 to 28-inch (25-70 cm) tall stems (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Bogler 2006; Welsh et al. 2016). Stems are branched, often covered in fine soft hairs, and exude a milky juice when damaged (Bogler 2006; Lesica 2012; Welsh et al. 2016). Plants produce basal and stem leaves. Stem leaves have long petioles that clasp the stems (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Bogler 2006; Welsh et al. 2016). Lower leaves measure 4 to 16 inches (10-40 cm) long and 0.8 to 3.5 inches (2-9 cm) Figure 4. Limestone hawksbeard in flower. Note the wide (Munz and Keck 1973; Bogler 2006). They are indeterminate flowering and gray tomentose look of the elliptic, pointed at the apex, and pinnately lobed stems and leaves. Photo: USFS RMRS PSSL. half to three quarters of the way to the midvein. The triangular lobes are sometimes toothed Plants produce 10 to 60 flower heads in mostly (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Bogler 2006; Lesica flat-topped, compound inflorescenses (Fig. 4) 2012; Welsh et al. 2016). Leaves, like the stems, (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Bogler 2006). are sparsely to strongly gray tomentose (Fig. 4) Flower heads contain 7 to 16 florets (Babcock and (Babcock and Stebbins 1938). Stebbins 1938; Munz and Keck 1973). Involucres are narrowly cylindrical, 0.4 to 0.8 inch (1-2 cm) tall and less than a third as wide. The outer bracts are less than half as long as the inner bracts (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Hitchcock and Crepis intermedia A. Gray Crepis intermedia A. Gray. 3 Cronquist 2018). Corollas are yellow and 0.5 to 1.2 inches (1.4-3 cm) long (Babcock and Stebbins ECOLOGY 1938; Munz and Keck 1973). Anther tubes when well developed are about 0.2-inch (0.5 cm) long In general, hawksbeard seedlings rapidly develop and typically abort without producing pollen. a long slender taproot but aboveground biomass Style branches are 2.5 to 3.5 mm long (Babcock production is slower. Plants are considered and Stebbins 1938). The fruit is a subcylindric long-lived and take 2 to 3 years to produce seed achene 0.2 to 0.4 inch (0.6-1 cm) long with tapered (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; James et al. 2009; ends. It is yellow to brown with 10 to 12 ribs and Ogle et al. 2012). The limited number of ecological a dusky white pappus 0.3 to 0.4 inch (0.7-1 cm) studies available suggest that limestone long (Babcock and Stebbins 1938; Bogler 2006; hawksbeard is found on recently disturbed sites Lesica 2012). Limestone hawksbeard represents and at some sites it is an aggressive invader a somewhat peculiar group of polyploid (Dalzell 2004; Babcock and Stebbins 1938). apomicts, which combine the features of multiple species including tapertip hawksbeard, Modoc Seed and Seedling Ecology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Control of Sparganothis Pilleriana Schiff. and Lobesia Botrana Den
    Use of pheromones and other semiochemicals in integrated production IOBC wprs Bulletin Vol. 25(•) 2002 pp. •-• Control of Sparganothis pilleriana Schiff. and Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. in German vineyards using sex pheromone-mediated mating disruption Friedrich Louis, Anne Schmidt-Tiedemann, Karl-Josef Schirra State Education and Research Center for Agriculture, Viticulture and Horticulture, 67435 Neustadt/Wstr., Germany Abstract: Investigations were conducted from 1996 to 2000 to determine the feasibility of con- trolling the tortricid pest Sparganothis pilleriana Schiff. using its sex pheromone. Intitially, dif- ferent pheromone blends were tested in the field and the results have been published in previous papers. In 2000, after treating three generations of the pest with pheromone, the larval infestation was finally evaluated. The pheromone treatment reached a very good efficacy in reducing the larvae. Evaluation of larval density in 2000 after using mating disruption to control three genera- tions of the pest revealed that pheromone could provide economic control. Investigations on the use of the mating disruption technique against another very important tortricid in German viticul- ture, Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff., showed the control of this pest with pheromones was very effective. Most importantly, mating disruption was effective against an occasional third generation of this pest that cannot be controlled using insecticide. The use of pheromone and insecticide could reduce the density of L. botrana to levels where pheromone alone could be used to achieve economic control. Key words: viticulture, Sparganothis pilleriana, Lobesia botrana, pheromones, mating disrup- tion, third generation Introduction Sparganothis pilleriana Schiff. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) is a tortricid native to Germany that causes severe damage in several German and European vine growing regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
    1 A molecular phylogeny of Cochylina, with confirmation of its relationship to Euliina 2 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) 3 4 John W. Brown*1, Leif Aarvik2, Maria Heikkilä3, Richard Brown4, and Marko Mutanen5 5 6 1 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA, e-mail: 7 [email protected] 8 2 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway, e-mail: [email protected] 9 3 Finnish Museum of Natural History, LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, 10 Finland, e-mail: [email protected] 11 4 Mississippi Entomological Museum, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA, e-mail: 12 [email protected] 13 5 Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, PO Box 3000, 90014, University of Oulu, Finland, e- 14 mail: [email protected] 15 *corresponding author 16 17 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Brown, J.W., Aarvik, L., Heikkilä, M., 18 Brown, R. and Mutanen, M. (2020), A molecular phylogeny of Cochylina, with confirmation of its 19 relationship to Euliina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Syst Entomol, 45: 160-174., which has been 20 published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12385. 21 1 22 Abstract. We conducted a multiple-gene phylogenetic analysis of 70 species representing 24 23 genera of Cochylina and eight species representing eight genera of Euliina, and a maximum 24 likelihood analysis based on 293 barcodes representing over 220 species of Cochylina. The 25 results confirm the hypothesis that Cochylina is a monophyletic group embedded within a 26 paraphyletic Euliina. We recognize and define six major monophyletic lineages within 27 Cochylina: a Phtheochroa Group, a Henricus Group, an Aethes Group, a Saphenista Group, a 28 Phalonidia Group, and a Cochylis Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Hoverfly Cheilosia Urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae)
    USDA iiillllllllll United States Department of Field release of the hoverfly Agriculture Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Marketing and Regulatory Syrphidae) for biological Programs control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Field release of the hoverfly Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae) for biological control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. FishFish & & Wildlife Wildlife Service Service Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Established in 1994, the 25,000-acre Givira arbeloides Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Prionoxystus robiniae is a remnant of what was once a much Carpenterworm Moth larger, frequently flooded, bottomland hardwood forest. You are still able to Crambid Snout Moths (Crambidae) view vast expanses of ridge and swale Achyra rantalis floodplain features, numerous bayous, Garden Webworm Moth oxbow lakes, and cypress/tupelo swamps Aethiophysa invisalis along the Trinity River. It is one of Argyria lacteella only 14 priority-one bottomland sites Milky Urola Moth identified for protection in the Texas Carectocultus perstrialis Bottomland Protection Plan. Texas is Reed-boring Crambid Moth home to an estimated 4,000 species of Chalcoela iphitalis moths. Most of the nearly 400 species of Sooty-winged Chalcoela moths listed below were photographed Chrysendeton medicinalis around the security lights at the Refuge Bold Medicine Moth Headquarters building located adjacent Colomychus talis to a bottomland hardwood forest. Many Distinguished Colomychus more moths are not even attracted to Conchylodes ovulalis lights, so additional surveys will need Zebra Conchylodes to be conducted to document those Crambus agitatellus species. These forests also support a Double-banded Grass-veneer wide diversity of mammals, reptiles, Crambus satrapellus amphibians, and fish with many feeding Crocidophora tuberculalis on moths or their larvae. Pale-winged Crocidophora Moth Desmia funeralis For more information, visit our website: Grape leaf-folder www.fws.gov/southwest Desmia subdivisalis Diacme elealis Contact the Refuge staff if you should Paler Diacme Moth find an unlisted or rare species during Diastictis fracturalis your visit and provide a description.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List for Garey Park-Inverts
    Species List for Garey Park-Inverts Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Category Order Family Scientific Name Common Name Abundance Arachnid Araneae Agelenidae Funnel Weaver Common Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Araneus miniatus Black-Spotted Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Araneae Thomisidae Misumessus oblongus American Green Crab Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope aurantia Yellow Garden Spider Common Arachnid Araneae Uloboridae Uloborus glomosus Featherlegged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Argiope trifasciata Banded Garden Spider Uncommon Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aceria theospyri Persimmon Leaf Blister Gall Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gasteracantha cancriformis Spinybacked Orbweaver Common Arachnid Endeostigmata Eriophyidae Aculops rhois Poison Ivy Leaf Mite Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Gea heptagon Heptagonal Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Amblyomma americanum Lone Star Tick Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Larinioides cornutus Furrow Orbweaver Common Arachnid Ixodida Ixodidae Dermacentor variabilis American Dog Tick Common Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora gibberosa Lined Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Opiliones Sclerosomatidae Leiobunum vittatum Eastern Harvestman Uncommon Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mangora placida Tuft-legged Orbweaver Uncommon Arachnid Trombidiformes Anystidae Whirligig Mite Rare Arachnid Araneae Araneidae Mecynogea lemniscata Basilica Orbweaver Rare Arachnid Eumesosoma roeweri
    [Show full text]
  • Reidentification of Pheromone Composition Of
    Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 12 (2009) 247–252 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jape Reidentification of pheromone composition of Sparganothis sulfureana (Clemens) and evidence of geographic variation in male responses from two US states Junwei Zhu a,⁎, Sridhar Polavarapu b, Kye-Chung Park c, Carolyn Garvey d, Daniel Mahr d, Satoshi Nojima e, Wendell Roelofs e, Tom Baker f a USDA-ARS-NPA, Agroecosystem Management Research Unit, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA b Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research and Extension, Chatsworth, NJ 08019, USA c Plant and Food Research, Canterbury Research Center, Gerald Street, P.O. Box 51, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand d Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA e Department of Entomology, Barton Laboratory, Cornell University-New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, NY 14456, USA f Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA article info abstract Article history: GC-EAD analyses of pheromone gland extracts of calling female Sparganothis sulfureana revealed at least 6 Received 10 March 2009 compounds that consistently elicited antennal responses from male antennae. In addition to the major Revised 21 April 2009 pheromone compound, (E)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (E11–14:OAc), which was previously reported, the other Accepted 26 April 2009 compounds were found to be (E)-9-dodecenyl acetate (E9–12:OAc), (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate (Z9–12:OAc), (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (Z9–14:OAc), (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (Z11–14:OAc), and (E)-11-tetradecenol Keywords: (E11–14:OH). Tetradecyl acetate, hexadecyl acetate and hexadecenyl acetates were also present in the extracts, Sex pheromone Sparganothis sulfureana but elicited no EAG response from male antennae.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterton Lakes National Park • Common Name(Order Family Genus Species)
    Waterton Lakes National Park Flora • Common Name(Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Arrow-grass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrow-grass, Seaside (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Arrowhead, Northern (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata) • Asphodel, Sticky False (Liliales Liliaceae Triantha glutinosa) • Barley, Foxtail (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Hordeum jubatum) • Bear-grass (Liliales Liliaceae Xerophyllum tenax) • Bentgrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Podagrostis humilis) • Bentgrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis stolonifera) • Bentgrass, Green (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Calamagrostis stricta) • Bentgrass, Spike (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis exarata) • Bluegrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa alpina) • Bluegrass, Annual (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Arctic (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arctica) • Bluegrass, Plains (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arida) • Bluegrass, Bulbous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa bulbosa) • Bluegrass, Canada (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa compressa) • Bluegrass, Cusick's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa cusickii) • Bluegrass, Fendler's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa fendleriana) • Bluegrass, Glaucous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa glauca) • Bluegrass, Inland (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa interior) • Bluegrass, Fowl (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Patterson's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pattersonii) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pratensis) • Bluegrass, Sandberg's (Poales
    [Show full text]
  • Bericht Vom 4. Obersteirischen Entomologentreffen (Lepidoptera)
    Joannea Zool. 1: 27–47 (1999) Bericht vom 4. Obersteirischen Entomologentreffen (Lepidoptera) Roland KREUZER und Gerhard STIMPFL Zusammenfassung: Dieser Bericht fasst das Ergebnis der Datenaufsammlungen von neun Lepidopterologen im Rahmen des 4.Obersteirischen Entomologentreffens im Som- mer 1995 zusammen. Die Daten wurden in der Umgebung der Klosterneuburger Hütte (Wölzer Tauern, Steiermark, Österreich) und in der Umgebung der Ruine Offenburg nörd- lich von Pöls (Steiermark, Österreich) gesammelt. Die 326 dabei registrierten Arten sind in einer Tabelle aufgelistet, die auch die Mengen der gefundenen Tiere für die Teilnehmer zeigt. Bemerkenswerte Funde sind darüber hinaus kommentiert. Der Bericht ist ein Bei- trag zur weiteren und genaueren Erforschung der steirischen Schmetterlingsfauna. Abstract: This report shows the result of nine lepidopterologists collecting data during the Fourth Upperstyrian Meeting Of Entomologists in summer 1995. The data were collected near the Klosterneuburger Hütte (Wölzer Tauern, Styria, Austria) and near the ruins of castle Offenburg north of Pöls (Styria, Austria). The 326 species which were registered at this meeting are scheduled in a list which also shows the amounts of the Lepidoptera found by the lepidopterologists who took part. Einleitung Das 4. Obersteirische Entomologentreffen fand vom 22. bis 23. Juli 1995 statt. Wäh- rend die ersten drei Treffen dieser Art im Gebiet der Seetaler Alpen durchgeführt worden waren, wurde diesmal der Gasthof Zezula in Pöls als Basislager gewählt. Als Exkursions- gebiet diente dann die Umgebung der Klosterneuburger Hütte, welche sich am Rand des Lachtalgebietes in den Wölzer Tauern befindet. Die Beobachtungstätigkeit der Teilneh- mer konzentrierte sich dabei auf den Bereich des Höhenrückens, der sich von der Klosterneuburger Hütte entlang der seicht abwärts führenden „Höhenstraße“ (das ist die Mautstraße von Oberzeiring zur Klosterneuburger Hütte) ostwärts erstreckt.
    [Show full text]