DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of Nuisance Fly Populations on Cattle Feedlots FLOT.306

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of Nuisance Fly Populations on Cattle Feedlots FLOT.306 Management Of Nuisance Fly Populations On Cattle Feedlots FLOT.306 Final Report prepared for MLA by: R Urech, PE Green, AG Skerman, MM Elson-Harris, JA Hogsette, RL Bright, GW Brown Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd Locked Bag 991 North Sydney NSW 2059 ISBN 9781741914610 May 2004 FEEDLOTS Management of nuisance fly populations on cattle feedlots FLOT.306 ABSTRACT................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................... 6 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................ 6 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................ 6 Survey – Fly control on cattle feedlots..............................................................6 Resistance to insecticides in flies from cattle feedlots...................................7 Fly and parasite population monitoring on cattle feedlots .............................7 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.................................................................... 8 Survey – Fly control on cattle feedlots..............................................................8 Survey findings ..........................................................................................................8 Survey conclusions ...................................................................................................9 Resistance to insecticides in flies from cattle feedlots.................................10 Topical insecticide application ...............................................................................10 Cage assay ...............................................................................................................10 Fly and parasite population monitoring on cattle feedlots ...........................10 Adult fly populations ...............................................................................................11 Seasonal effects on fly catches ....................................................................................... 11 Comparison of feedlot sites ............................................................................................. 12 Feedlot management practices........................................................................................ 13 Observations of feedlot cattle behaviour........................................................................ 13 Immature fly populations ........................................................................................13 Seasonal effects ................................................................................................................ 13 Feedlot sites....................................................................................................................... 14 Effects of feedlot design and practices........................................................................... 15 Parasite populations................................................................................................16 Parasitic wasps.................................................................................................................. 16 Mites associated with feedlot flies................................................................................... 17 Entomopathogenic fungi .................................................................................................. 18 Fly and parasite population monitoring in other feedlots ....................................18 SUCCESS IN ACHIEVING OBJECTIVES ................................................ 19 IMPACT ON MEAT AND LIVESTOCK INDUSTRY.................................. 20 1 Management of nuisance fly populations on cattle feedlots FLOT.306 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................... 22 Integrated pest management (IPM) for nuisance flies on cattle feedlots.....22 Elements of IPM for nuisance flies.........................................................................22 Reducing fly breeding sites ....................................................................................23 Using insecticides selectively.................................................................................23 Lot feeding design principles .................................................................................24 Enhancing populations of natural control agents.................................................25 Systematic monitoring of fly populations..............................................................25 Recommendations.............................................................................................27 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX - FLY AND PARASITE POPULATION MONITORING ON CATTLE FEEDLOTS ................................................................................ 37 2 Management of nuisance fly populations on cattle feedlots FLOT.306 ABSTRACT Nuisance flies are recognised as a problem on Australian feedlots despite improved manure management over the past decade. The species, abundance and extent of breeding of nuisance flies and their natural enemies were determined on three feedlots. House flies were identified as the major fly problem and their chemical resistance status determined. Several biological agents, in particular parasitic wasps, played an important role in fly control. An integrated pest management (IPM) strategy for nuisance fly control is provided and further work is proposed, including the use of biological control agents such as wasps and entomopathogenic fungi. Implementation of the IPM strategy and further R&D should provide the industry with effective, sustainable and economic fly control. 3 Management of nuisance fly populations on cattle feedlots FLOT.306 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The feedlot industry has applied a significant amount of effort to improved manure management practices over the past decade as a means of reducing odour emissions and fly problems. There is, however, evidence that fly populations remain a serious problem. Insecticide resistance and a desire to minimise the use of chemicals also drive the need to move to a more integrated approach to fly control. A questionnaire survey of Australian feedlots on fly control showed that 83% of feedlot operators considered flies a problem and that working conditions, human health, animal welfare, chemical residues and production losses were rated as the most important adverse impact of flies. The survey indicated that flies are controlled by a range of physical, cultural and chemical means. Almost 60% of the feedlots used some form of chemical fly control. Forty-three percent of respondents used baits, about a quarter used insecticide sprays, and 15% used traps to control flies. The effectiveness of these treatments was considered to be moderate by the majority of the respondents. The data collected in this survey was used to finetune the feedlot fly and parasite monitoring programs, select commonly used chemicals for resistance testing and formulate integrated pest management guidelines for the control of fly populations. Good control from insecticides relies on knowing what resistance is present in the fly populations and using the remaining effective chemicals in carefully planned programs. Flies from southern Queensland (SQ) showed a moderate level of resistance to diazinon (19 x), a lower level to trichlorfon (3.2 x) and were susceptible to azamethiphos and cyfluthrin. The central New South Wales (CNSW) and central Queensland (CQ) isolates showed moderate levels of resistance to diazinon (7 to 11 x), and appeared susceptible to azamethiphos and cyfluthrin. All feedlot isolates showed a reduced mortality response to Snip Fly Bait and the SQ and CNSW flies also showed a reduced mortality to Dy-Fly bait but not to the same extent as with Snip. The observed reduction in bait efficacy was due to a change in the flies’ behaviour. The impact on field efficacy of these baits is uncertain, although some loss of control might be expected. Populations of adult and immature nuisance flies and their parasites were monitored on three Australian feedlots with one SQ feedlot being continuously monitored over two years. The most commonly trapped adult flies on the SQ feedlot were house flies (Musca domestica, 38% of total fly catch) and hairy maggot blowflies (Chrysomya rufifacies, 27%). Other common species trapped were the bush fly (M. vetustissima, 15%) and the stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans, 1.3%). All fly populations were low during the coldest winter months, house flies had one broad annual population peak extending over nine months, whereas stable flies showed two peaks in late autumn and late spring. House fly and stable fly populations were higher inside than outside the feedlot, whereas bush fly and blowfly catches were generally higher outside the feedlot. There was a strong correlation between the number of adult flies and behavioural responses of cattle irritated by flies. The frequency of tail swishes, ear flicks and head tosses can be used to gauge house fly and bush fly populations, and leg stomps correlated well with the stable fly populations. Systematic counts of the frequency of these movements can provide an estimate of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Insect Succession Pattern on Decomposing Pig Carcasses In
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 153, 2019 31 INSECT SUCCESSION PATTERN ON DECOMPOSING PIG CARCASSES IN TASMANIA: A SUMMER STUDY by Paola A. Magni, J. David North, Melle Zwerver, Ian R. Dadour (with one text- igure, two plates and one table) Magni, P.A., North, J.D., Zwerver, M., Dadour, I.R. 2019 (14:xii). Insect succession pattern on decomposing pig carcasses in Tasmania: a summer study. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 153: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.153.31 ISSN 0080–4703. Discipline of Medical, Molecular & Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia (PAM, IRD). Murdoch University Singapore, King’s Centre, 390 Havelock Road, Singapore 169662 (current address: PAM). Tasmania Police Forensic Services, 37–43 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia (JDN). Tasmania Police, Devonport Police Station, 24 Wenvoe Street, Devonport, Tasmania 7310, Australia (MZ). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected]. Insect succession has been studied around the world using the predictable and mostly sequential arrival pattern of different insect species that are attracted to a decomposing carcass. In cases of suspicious death of humans and animals, carrion insects may be used to assist in crime scene reconstruction. The present research represents the first study in forensic entomology to be undertaken in Tasmania, investi-gating insect succession patterns on decomposing pig carcasses and providing a preliminary database of forensically important insects. Six pig carcasses were placed in two contrasting locations (rural and urban) in northern Tasmania. Insect successional waves were recorded over a 40-day study during the austral summer season.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Control of the Trachoma Vector Musca Sorbens
    Durham E-Theses Ecology and control of the trachoma vector Musca sorbens Emerson, Paul Michael How to cite: Emerson, Paul Michael (2001) Ecology and control of the trachoma vector Musca sorbens, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3995/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Ecology and control of the trachoma vector Musca sorbens Paul Michael Emerson The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Department of Biological Sciences University of Durham Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, December 2001 EcoBegy and control of the trachoma vector Musca sorbens Paul M. Emerson The work described in this thesis was conducted in rural Gambia and builds a body of evidence incriminating the fly Musca sorbens as a vector of the blinding disease, trachoma, which is caused by ocular infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting New Kinds of Dung Beetles for Better Bush Fly Control
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 25 Number 3 1984 Article 14 1-1-1984 Selecting new kinds of dung beetles for better bush fly control T J. Ridsdill-Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Ridsdill-Smith, T J. (1984) "Selecting new kinds of dung beetles for better bush fly control," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 25 : No. 3 , Article 14. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol25/iss3/14 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • Dung beetles By T. J. Ridsdill Smith, CSIRO Division of Biological control shredding fresh dung. Entomology, Perth Biological control is a strategy by which other Native dung beetles are found in south-western living organisms are used to control a species Australia, but they are largely restricted to that has become a pest. Once the introduced areas of natural uegetaf ion where they feed on species is successfully established, it is dung pellets of marsupials. self-perpetuating. When European man cleared the land, planted Dung beetles and bush fly larvae both feed in pastures and introduced cattle, he created a dung. When beetles are abundant in a dung pad new type of environment which did not suit they compete with the flies which are then killed most native beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Colour on the Numbers of Houseflies Resting on Painted Surfaces
    THE EFFECT OF COLOUR ON THE NUMBERS OF HOUSEFLIES RESTING ON PAINTED SURFACES By D. F. WATERHOUSE* [Accepted for Publication September 22, 1947] Summary A simple technique for determining the preference of houseflies for surfdces of various colours is described. This consists of liberating adults into a Peet·Grady testing chamher fitted with movable coloured corners. The numbers of flies rest· ing on the coloured corners are recorded at intervals to provide adequate data for comparison. The ascending order of preference for the particular colours lested was white and sky hlue (equal) ,light grey, green, yellow and medium grey (equal), dusky hIue, and red. From measurements of the visual reflectances of the various colours it was found. that the order of preference could he explained. largely hy a reaction to the intensity of the light reflected hy the coloured surfaces, darker surfaces heing preferred to lighter surfaces. I. INTRODUCTION Colour perception in insects has been reviewed extensively by Weiss (1943, 1944, 1946), who points out' that most of the available information indicates that light intensity is more important than wavelength' in producing reactions. However, von Frisch and others have shown that, for bees at least, there is a definite wavelength discrimination (Wigglesworth 1939). The present tests were initiated when a proposal was made during the war that army kitchens and hospitals should be painted dark blue to repel flies. While it is well known that the common bush fly, Musca vetustissima, will not enter darkened rooms, the reaction of the housefly, M. domestica, is quite dif­ ferent. Thus there is a general trend in the evidence of Freeborn and Berry (1935) and Atkeson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of the Dog Dung Fly, Musca Sorbens Wiedemann, in Hawaii 12 Ronald F
    Vol. XXIII, No. 3, February, 1981 375 Bionomics of the Dog Dung Fly, Musca sorbens Wiedemann, in Hawaii 12 Ronald F. L. Mau,MinoruTamashiro, and WallaceC. Mitchell Department of Entomology university of hawaii, honolulu, hawaii 96822 Musca sorbens Wiedemann (Diptera: Muscidae) is a dung breeding fly which occurs in the Ethiopian, Oriental, and some tropical and subtropical areas of the Palearctic region. The fly has also been recorded from many Pacific islands among which are Guam, Kwajalein, Ebeye, Aitutaki, Samoa, Solomon Islands, and Hawaii. The larvae develop in various types of animal feces. Human, dog, pig, horse, cattle, and water buffalo dung are common breeding sources. In Hawaii, larval habitats include dog, cat, bovine, horse, goat, and pig dung (Yu 1971). Dog and cat dung were reported to be excellent sources for lar val development when compared with cattle dung (Mau 1978). The dog dung fly was discovered in Hawaii in 1949 (Joyce 1950). Wilton (1963) reported that there were many complaints about annoying flies where M. sorbens was present. By 1970, complaints about flies were widespread and numerous, and subsequent surveys by Department of Health entomologists indicated that much of the problem was directly attributable to activities of the dog dung fly. In order to develop and implement control procedures, detailed infor mation on the biology and seasonal abundance was needed. This paper presents the results of biological studies. Materials and Methods Rearing, A laboratory culture was established from field collections of adults from several locations on Oahu and maintained using the following procedures. Flies were provided daily with sliced beef liver beginning the second day following emergence and continuing for 3 days thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushflies (DPI Vic)
    May, 1995 Bushflies AG0410 Richard Crow, Burnley ISSN 1329-8062 Expiry date: May, 1998 The bushfly (Musca vetustissima) is a native fly found all cattle, sheep, and native animals is preferred. Only fresh over Australia. It is often confused with the housefly. The dung is attractive and the female usually feeds on this bushfly does not bite but is a persistent outdoor pest that before laying her eggs. causes irritation to people and animals. An egg-laying female attracts other females, so many thousands of eggs may be laid in one place. The eggs hatch in less than eight hours in hot weather. The larvae quickly emerge, burrow into the dung and begin feeding. They grow rapidly, passing through three stages, each marked by shedding of the skin. The length of the larval period, like the egg stage, is controlled by temperature and takes about five days. Maggots of the bushfly cannot survive at temperature below 120C. The fully-grown larvae leave the dung at night and bury themselves in the soil where they form pupae. Adult bushfIles emerge from three to 18 days later. They reach Figure 1. The bushfly (Musca vetustissima) sexual maturity after about three days, but the females Appearance and identification mate and lay eggs only after obtaining a feed of protein, mainly from the dung and body fluids of animals. The adult bushfly is about 6 mm long and has one pair of colourless, transparent wings. The body is grey with black The adult bushfly lives for from two to 11 weeks, markings on the abdomen, of which the first segment is depending on temperature and availability of food and completely black.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD/OCDE 228 Adopted: 29 July 2016
    OECD/OCDE 228 Adopted: 29 July 2016 OECD GUIDELINEFOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS Determination of Developmental Toxicity to Dipteran Dung Flies(Scathophaga stercoraria L. (Scathophagidae), Musca autumnalis De Geer (Muscidae)) INTRODUCTION 1. This Test Guideline is designed to assess the effects of the test chemical on the development of dung dwelling life stages of dung-dependent dipteran species. In this test, insects are exposed under controlled conditions [1] to the test chemical spiked into the dung. An extended test, in which the flies are exposed to dung originating from livestock treated with the test substance, is described in ANNEX 4. 2. Scathophaga stercoraria L. (Scathophagidae) and Musca autumnalis De Geer (Muscidae)) are considered to be suitable indicator species for estimating the developmental toxicity of parasiticides on dung dependant Diptera for the following main reasons: Collectively, the species cover a wide geographic range. S. stercoraria and M. autumnalis are widespread in Europe, Asia, Africa and North America [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. By including a Musca-species the area which is covered by this guideline is extended: For example, the Australian species M. vetustissima could be tested in the same way as M. autumnalis, while S. stercoraria is not occurring there. Despite some overlap, the two species differ in their temperature preferences: S. stercoraria avoids temperatures >25° and has been found in Iceland and at high altitudes in the Alps while M. autumnalis prefers just the opposite. 3. Both species are dung-dependent, are multi-voltine, do not undergo obligate diapause and are easy to culture and have a short life-cycle which makes it possible to determine effects on development and survival in the laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Pest Control 1 Biological Pest Control
    Biological pest control 1 Biological pest control The current scope of this article does not include composting techniques. For these see Composting: Destroying pathogens, seeds, or unwanted plants or Mulch: Mulching (composting) over unwanted plants. Biological control is a method of controlling pests (including insects, mites, weeds and plant diseases) using other living organisms. It relies on predation, parasitism, herbivory, or other natural mechanisms, but typically also involves an active human management role. It can be an important component of integrated pest management (IPM) programs. There are three basic types of biological pest control strategies: importation (sometimes called classical biological control), augmentation and conservation. Natural enemies of insect pests, also known as biological control agents, include predators, parasitoids, and pathogens. Biological control agents of plant diseases are most often referred to as antagonists. Biological control agents of weeds include herbivores and plant pathogens. Types of biological pest control There are three basic types of biological pest control strategies: importation (sometimes called classical biological control), augmentation and conservation.[1] Importation Importation (or "classical biological control") involves the introduction of a pest's natural enemies to a new locale where they do not occur naturally. This is usually done by government authorities. In many instances the complex of natural enemies associated with a pest may be inadequate, a situation that can occur when a pest is accidentally introduced into a new geographic area, without its associated natural enemies. These introduced pests are referred to as exotic pests and comprise about 40% of the insect pests in the United States. The process of importation involves determining the origin of the introduced pest and then collecting appropriate natural enemies associated with the pest or closely related species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Flies : Where They All Come From
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 25 Number 3 1984 Article 13 1-1-1984 Bush flies : where they all come from J N. Matthiessen Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Matthiessen, J N. (1984) "Bush flies : where they all come from," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 25 : No. 3 , Article 13. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol25/iss3/13 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ^J*/*2j^^^wmiJm?*d — where they all come from By J. N. Matthiessen, CSIRO Division of Seasonal distribution Entomology, Perth Permanent bush fly populations are found in about half of the agricultural region of south­ western Australia, north-east of a line from The bush fly is a native Australian insect which Dandaragan-Cunderdin-Newdegate. They die breeds in dung and has had its reproductive out in winter south-west of this line because it is opportunities greatly expanded by the too wet and cold for continuous breeding (see introduction of cattle into the country. map). In the agricultural region of south-western Where flies are always present, fewest are found Australia bush flies appear in large numbers in in late winter. After the build-up of populations spring and early summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Excreta, Flies and Trachoma
    A WELL FACTSHEET Excreta, flies and trachoma Text by: Paul Emerson, Technical Editing by: Andrew Cotton Quality assurance by: Sandy Cairncross Edited and produced as a PDF document: May 2020 This factsheet presents evidence on the relationship between the common eye-seeking fly musca sorbens, the eye disease trachoma and the role that environmental health factors (including habitat, climate and sanitation) play in its transmission. Introduction Trachoma is an infectious disease caused by Chlamydia trachomatis – a micro-organism which spreads through contact with eye discharge from the infected person and through transmission by eye-seeking flies. Trachoma affects about 84 million people of whom about 8 million are visually impaired and repeated infection, if untreated, can lead to blindness. Trachoma is the leading cause of preventable blindness and continues to be a major problem in many of the poorest and most remote rural areas of Africa, Asia, Central and South America. Active disease is most common in pre-school children with prevalence rates as high as 60-90%. It often strikes the most vulnerable members of communities--women and children, with adult women at much greater risk of developing the blinding complication of trachoma than are adult men. The key environmental risk factors are water shortage, flies, poor hygiene conditions, and crowded households (WHO 2006). The eye-seeking fly Musca Sorbens Adult Musca sorbens feed directly from people or on food gathered by people. They lay their eggs on the faeces of people (and their domestic livestock) and they rest at night on the walls of human structures. The close affinity of Musca sorbens to man, coupled with aggressive feeding on substances (ocular and nasal discharges) that may contain Chlamydia trachomatis by females, allow it to be a mechanical vector of trachoma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Requirement for Reassessment of Interactions Among Dung Beetles
    120 Miscellaneous Publication No. 61 Biological Control of M uscoid Flies 121 a greater survival might result through easing of the crowding effect thereby increasing each The Requirement for Reassessment of Interactions Among individual's chance of finding ample food for development. Such dispersal may be quite common Dung Beetles, Symbovine Flies, and Natural Enemies in nature, especiaIly in fields where soil is moist and large populations of dung-burying scarabs have turned underground huge quantities of fresh dung. Macqueen (1975) and Hughes et al. (1978) reviewed several cases in the field where bush fly reductions may have resulted from the activities E.F. Legner of scarab beetles; and Ridsdill-Smith and Mattiessen (1984) give experimental evidence for some Division of Biological Control reduction by endemic and imported scarab beetles. However, the degree ofcontrol was generally University of California very low. Immigration of bush flies from outside the experimental area often tends to confound Riverside. CA 92521. USA the results. The only apparent reduction of noticeable magnitude in density of symbovine flies as a result Abstract of biological control was reported from Fiji involVing a single predator, Hister chinemis Quensel, that was not imported for control of symbovine flies in the first place (Bornemissza 1968). A minor Scarab dung beetles continue to be utilized effectively for biological control of cattle dung, but success apparently occurred in Hawaii, which involved both dung-burying scarab and predatory densities of symbovine Diptera remain unacceptably high. It is now apparent that dung dispersion beetles (Legner (1978b). by these beetles does not always automatically lead to diminished fly abundance under natural There is no question that several species of scarab beetles can attain field population densities field conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects As Biocontrol Agents
    © 2020 JETIR June 2020, Volume 7, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Insects as biocontrol agents Ankita kumari*, 1Prof. Arti prasad, 2Manoj joshi, 2Chetna suvalka, 2Kanishtha acharya 1Professor and Head , Department of Zoology , UCOS , MLSU , UDAIPUR. 2Research Scholar, Lab of Public Health Entomology, Dept of Zoology , UCOS, MLSU, UDAIPUR Abstract An attractive alternative method to chemical pesticides is the insect biocontrol (MBCAs) agents. They are the natural enemies devastating the pest population with no hazard effects on human health and the environment. Like Entomopathogenic fungi has an important position among all the biocontrol agents because of its route of pathogenicity, broad host rang and its ability to control both sap sucking pests such as mosquitoes and aphids as well as pests with chewing mouthparts, yet they only cover a small percentage of the total insecticide market. Improvements are needed to fulfill the requirements for high market share. The biocontrol agent are required to eliminate the chance that the putative impact of the biocontrol agent is not confounded with other causes. Overall, we argue that well replicated and landscape-scale post release monitoring programs are required not only to evaluate critically the degree of success and failure of biocontrol programs worldwide but also to provide insights into improving future biocontrol efforts. Keywords: Biological control, Fungai, Bacteria, Viruses, Predators, Parasitoids, Pathogens. Introduction: - Biological control or biocontrol is a method of controlling pests such as insects, mites, weeds and plant diseases using other organisms.[1] It relies on predation, parasitism, herbivory, or other natural mechanisms, but typically also involves an active human management role.
    [Show full text]