DOCSLIB.ORG

The Systematist 25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Systematist 25 NewsletterThe of theSystematist Systematics Association Summer 2005 Number 25 www.systass.org ISSN 1744-5701 Spotlight on Meeting report DAISY and automated Palms: identification an International Symposium the Biology of the Palm Family Book reviews Milestones in Systematics. Organelles, BackPage Genomes and News and Eukaryote Phylogeny. forthcoming events of the Systematics Association Portrait of Dispersal Rafting Iguanas or Rifting Continents? Eukaryote Phylogeny: an Université Pierre et Marie Curie in Evolutionary Synthesis by Hirt and Paris. Please address all your corre- Editorial Horner. spondence to Malte Ebach (see address and email details on BackPage). th 25 Issue of The 5th Biennial in Cardiff Systematist August 22 - 26 Greetings and welcome to the The 5th Biennial Meeting of the th Summer and 25 issue of The Systematics Association held in Systematist: Newsletter of the association with the National Systematics Association. The lead Museum and Art Gallery of Wales article in the Summer issue explores and the University of Cardiff will be the revolutions in biogeography and held in Cardiff, Wales. The Meeting their shaky past in relation to geolo- will have three invited symposia gy in Biogeography and Scientific The New Taxonomy hosted by Revolutions by Dennis McCarthy. Quentin Wheeler, What is The book reviews start on Page 16 McCarthy's ‘thought provoking’ Biogeography? Hosted by Malte exposé of biogeographical thinking Last of all our BackPage lists all the Ebach and Ray Tangney and over the last 150 years will be fol- events and contact details of the Compatibility Methods in lowed up by with a presentation for Systematics Association. Systematics hosted by Mark the Biogeography Symposium at the We thank our contributing authors Wilkinson. Contributing speakers th 5 Biennial Meeting of the for their views, reviews and will be holding parallel sessions Systematics Association in Cardiff thoughts. The Systematist is looking during the duration of the confer- during August 22 - 26. Also in this forward to receiving any responses ence. Interested parties wanting to issue, we have a Systematics or counter-views expressed in any attend for a day or for the whole Association conference report of the recently published articles. symposium may pay their registra- International Symposium on the tion fees on the day. Please contact Biology of the Palm Family by Bill The editors look forward to your Ray Tangney (see www.systass.org) Baker as well as our Spotlight fea- contributions and suggestions. if you have any queries regarding ture article on Automated Object the meeting. Recognition in Systematics by Norm Change of Editorship MacLeod, Stig Walsh and Mark O'Neill introducing their revolution- On a sad note, Paul Wilkin will be ary new data recognition system retiring as co-editor of The called DAISY. MacLeod, Walsh and Systematist. Under Paul's editorship O'Neill will be hosting the the Newsletter has seen a dramatic Algorithmic Approaches to the transformation. Now with a new Identification Problem in title and an expansion to 24 glossy Systematics Symposium to be held at pages, The Systematist has already the Natural History Museum on been cited in the New York Times August 19. We look forward to (December 12, 2004) and reaches a meeting you there! wide audience of comparative biolo- Other articles in the Summer issue gists, journalists and geographers include a critique of systematics in worldwide via our website Quentin Wheeler's review of the lat- (www.systass.org). In the new year est Systematics Association publica- the Systematics Association will tion Milestones in Systematics edit- assign a new co-editor to work with ed by Williams and Forey followed Malte Ebach. The new co-editor Details of the 5th Biennial Meeting of by an in depth review of our other will be announced in the next issue the Systematics Association can be latest Systematics Association publi- of The Systematist. Malte will also found at the Systematics Association cation, Organelles, Genomes and be moving France, based at the website: www.systass.org Cover illustration : ‘Dispersing Iguana’ montage. Copyright 2005 Dennis McCarthy (published with permis- Malte C. Ebach and Paul Wilkin sion). See page 3 for the lead article. Co - editors The Systematist 2005 No. 25 2 Biogeography and Scientific Revolutions Dennis McCarthy Buffalo Museum of Science, Buffalo, USA As our past disputes over evolution and continental drift make clear: those who underestimate the probative value of distributional evidence are like- ly to end up on the wrong side of science history. It appears that biogeog- raphy, which has served as the focal point of two recent scientific revolutions, is about to usher in a third. urrently, a significant would be more likely, on average, to that time the longest crossing of an number of distributional favor certain outdoorsy activities ice cap. The ‘father of continental facts, particularly like rock climbing and kayaking. drift’ would ultimately die on an C involving oceanic dis- His implication, perhaps, was that a expedition in Greenland in 1930. junctions of poor-dispersing taxa, love of nature combined with a cer- Alfred Russel Wallace spent a num- are in direct conflict with conven- tain fearlessness or, at least, moxie ber of years along the Amazon and tional palaeomaps of the Mesozoic might be helpful in rejecting reli- was one of the first Europeans to Pacific and Tethys. Many gious and academic dogma for the explore Rio Negro. In 1852, on his researchers have dealt with these inconsistencies by ignoring basic biogeographical realities and posit- ing radical cross-ocean dispersal hypotheses to explain the problem- atic disjunctions. The Revolutionaries The five revolutionaries (see inset), a group which could also include T. H., Huxley (evolution), These five Alexander du Toit (continental revolutionaries have drift), and Leon Croizat (vicari- led revolutions in three ance), all helped raze conventional scientific fields ... assumptions in geology, biology and psychology -- yet, as noted, each of They have one thing them, like Huxley, du Toit, and in common... Croizat, also happened to be bio- they are all geographers. The question is, 'Why biogeographers would so many revolutionaries in so many disparate fields of thought all be specialists in the little known steelier, realistic views of life. trip back to England from South field of biogeography?' Adventurousness may also be a trait America, his ship caught fire and One possible reason is that bio- commonly shared by scientific revo- sank, stranding Wallace and his geography is the science of adven- lutionaries. Wegener, while studying shipmates in cramped and leaky turers. During an interview about meteorology, took up hot air bal- lifeboats until their rescue ten days his book, Consilience, E.O. Wilson looning and in 1906 broke the world later. Undaunted, Wallace would once told me he suspected that those record for most time aloft, more later travel to Indonesia and become who followed the consilient view of than 52 hours. In 1912, while on an one of the first Europeans to live in the sciences and the sociobiological expedition in Greenland, he and his New Guinea for an extended period view of human nature and culture team barely survived what was at of time. Darwin's five year jaunt The Systematist 2005 No. 25 3 around-the-world, with a stop in tions to explain distributions; they Verde Islands are related to those of Galapagos is well known and needs used distributions to test orthodox Africa, like those of the Galapagos little elaboration here. Du Toit, like assumptions. to America. I believe this grand fact Wallace and Darwin, studied exten- In a letter to J.D. Hooker in 1845, can receive no sort of explanation sively throughout South America. Darwin described biogeography as on the ordinary view of independent He also helped map the Cape of the key to unlocking the mystery of creation; whereas on the view here Good Hope and spent time in the speciation, referring to ‘geographi- maintained, it is obvious that the other Gondwanan continents, India cal distribution’ as ‘that grand sub- Galapagos Islands would be likely and Australia. ject, that almost keystone of the to receive colonists, whether by The writings of these revolution- laws of creation.’ Fourteen years occasional means of transport or by aries, like their life histories, adver- later, he would publish The Origin formerly continuous land, from tise their Magellanic nature. of Species with two chapters devot- America; and the Cape de Verde Wallace's On the Law Which Has ed to ‘Geographical Distribution.’ In Islands from Africa; and that such Regulated the Introduction of New them, Darwin notes that frogs, colonists would be liable to modifi- Species, Darwin's The Origin of toads, and newts are almost com- cations; the principle of inheritance Species, Wegener's The Origin of pletely absent from oceanic islands - still betraying their original birth- Continents and Oceans, du Toit's places where they would be expect- place.’ Our Wandering Continents, do not ed to thrive. These distributions, as Like Darwin, Wallace (1855) also smell of the class room; they smell Darwin pointed out, are inconsistent used distributional patterns to help of swamps, jungles, rivers, and with the ‘theory of independent cre- mould the theory of evolution and beaches. Such risk-takers are not ation’, that is, the idea that species challenge conventional assumptions in biology. On the Law Which Has Regulated the Introduction of New The writings of these revolutionaries ... do not Species, Wallace's rudimentary pro- smell of the class room; they smell of swamps, logue to his evolutionary view, is first and foremost a biogeographical jungles, rivers, and beaches. paper. In it, Wallace puts forth argu- ments that read much like the work likely to be awed by professors or could be independently created in of Croizat, anticipating Croizat's cowed by textbooks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James A. Mccloskey, Jr
    CHEMICAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION JAMES A. MCCLOSKEY, JR. Transcript of Interviews Conducted by Michael A. Grayson at the McCloskeys’ Home Helotes, Texas on 19 and 20 March 2012 (With Subsequent Corrections and Additions) James A. McCloskey, Jr. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This oral history is one in a series initiated by the Chemical Heritage Foundation on behalf of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. The series documents the personal perspectives of individuals related to the advancement of mass spectrometric instrumentation, and records the human dimensions of the growth of mass spectrometry in academic, industrial, and governmental laboratories during the twentieth century. This project is made possible through the generous support of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. This oral history is designated Free Access. Please note: Users citing this interview for purposes of publication are obliged under the terms of the Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) Center for Oral History to credit CHF using the format below: James A. McCloskey, Jr., interview by Michael A. Grayson at the McCloskeys’ home, Helotes, Texas, 19-20 March 2012 (Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, Oral History Transcript # 0702). Chemical Heritage Foundation Center for Oral History 315 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 The Chemical Heritage Foundation (CHF) serves the community of the chemical and molecular sciences, and the wider public, by treasuring the past, educating the present, and inspiring the future. CHF maintains a world-class collection of materials that document the history and heritage of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries; encourages research in CHF collections; and carries out a program of outreach and interpretation in order to advance an understanding of the role of the chemical and molecular sciences, technologies, and industries in shaping society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great-Grandmother of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor)
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 June 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201806.0035.v1 Be introduced to the First Universal Common Ancestor (FUCA): the great-grandmother of LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor) Francisco Prosdocimi1*, Marco V José2 and Sávio Torres de Farias3* 1 Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e de Sistemas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 2 Theoretical Biology Group, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 CDMX, Mexico. 3 Laboratório de Genética Evolutiva Paulo Leminsk, Departamento de Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The existence of a common ancestor to all living organisms in Earth is a necessary corollary of Darwin idea of common ancestry. The Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) has been normally considered as the ancestor of cellular organisms that originated the three domains of life: Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya. Recent studies about the nature of LUCA indicate that this first organism should present hundreds of genes and a complex metabolism. Trying to bring another of Darwin ideas into the origins of life discussion, we went back into the prebiotic chemistry trying to understand how LUCA could be originated 1 © 2018 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 June 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201806.0035.v1 under gradualist assumptions. Along this line of reasoning, it became clear to us that the definition of another ancestral should be of particular relevance to the understanding about the emergence of biological systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Big Bang • the Amazon's Lost Civilizations • the Truth
    SFI Bulletin winter 2006, vol. 21 #1 Beyond the Big Bang • The Amazon’s Lost Civilizations • The Truth Behind Lying The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute is published by SFI to keep its friends and supporters informed about its work. The Santa Fe Institute is a private, independent, multidiscipli- nary research and education center founded in 1984. Since its founding, SFI has devoted itself to creating a new kind of sci- entific research community, pursuing emerging synthesis in science. Operating as a visiting institution, SFI seeks to cat- alyze new collaborative, multidisciplinary research; to break down the barriers between the traditional disciplines; to spread its ideas and methodologies to other institutions; and to encourage the practical application of its results. Published by the Santa Fe Institute 1399 Hyde Park Road Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA phone (505) 984-8800 fax (505) 982-0565 home page: http://www.santafe.edu Note: The SFI Bulletin may be read at the website: www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Bulletin/. If you would prefer to read the Bulletin on your computer rather than receive a printed version, contact Patrisia Brunello at 505/984-8800, Ext. 2700 or [email protected]. EDITORIAL STAFF: Ginger Richardson Lesley S. King Andi Sutherland CONTRIBUTORS: Brooke Harrington Janet Yagoda Shagam Julian Smith Janet Stites James Trefil DESIGN & PRODUCTION: Paula Eastwood PHOTO: ROBERT BUELTEMAN ©2004 BUELTEMAN PHOTO: ROBERT SFI Bulletin Winter 2006 TOCtable of contents 3 A Deceptively Simple Formula 2 How Life Began 3 From
    [Show full text]
  • Signature of Controversy
    I n “In this volume Granville Sewell provides “As the debate over intelligent design grows T delightful and wide-ranging commentary on increasingly heated... it is refreshing to find a HE the origins debate and intelligent design... discussion of the topic that is calm, thoughtful, Sewell provides much needed clarity on topics and far-ranging, with no sense of having to B e ignature f that are too often misunderstood. His discussion advance an agenda or decimate the opposition. G I S o of the commonly confused problem of entropy In this regard, Granville Sewell’s In the NNI is a must read.” Beginning succeeds brilliantly.” Cornelius G. Hunter, Ph.D. William A. Dembski, Ph.D. N author of The Design Inference author of Science’s Blind Spot G ontroversy A N c In this wide-ranging collection of essays on origins, mathematician Granville Sewell looks at the D big bang, the fine-tuning of the laws of physics, and the evolution of life. He concludes that while O there is much in the history of life that seems to suggest natural causes, there is nothing to support THER Responses to critics of signature in the cEll Charles Darwin’s idea that natural selection of random variations can explain major evolutionary E S advances (“easily the dumbest idea ever taken seriously by science,” he calls it). Sewell explains S A Y why evolution is a fundamentally different and much more difficult problem than others solved s ON by science, and why increasing numbers of scientists are now recognizing what has long been I obvious to the layman, that there is no explanation possible without design.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Department of Microbiology 1868 – 2009
    June 2015 HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 1868 – 2009 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY 1868 – 2009 This 141 year history of the Department of Microbiology includes an article (Chapter 1), written and published in 1959 by the Department, which covers the period 1868 to 1959. I joined the Department in 1953, and my recounting of the Department’s history includes personal observations as well as anecdotes told to me by H. O. Halvorson and others. Later I realized what a unique experience it had been to join a first-class department, and I resolved to play a role in maintaining its research stature. Ralph Wolfe 2 Department of Microbiology History of the Headship: 1950 – 1959 Halvor Halvorson 1960 – 1963 Kim Atwood 1963 – 1972 Leon Campbell 1972 – 1982 Ralph DeMoss 1982 – 1987 Samuel Kaplan 1987 – 1990 Jordan Konisky 1990 – 1991 Ralph Wolfe (Acting Head) 1991 – 1997 Charles Miller 1997 – 2002 John Cronan 2003 – 2004 Jeffrey Gardner (Acting Head) 2005 – Present John Cronan 3 Organization of the History of the Department In Chapters 2 to 6 the data are divided into Academic Decades, each containing the following sections: Section I, an overview of the decade; Section II, some events for each year of the decade; Section III, a summary of the research interests, honors received, publications, and invited off-campus lectures or seminars for each faculty member. These data have been obtained from the annual reports of the faculty submitted to the departmental secretary. 4 CHAPTER 1 1868 – 1959 During this time period the name of the Department was Department of Bacteriology (Anecdotes by Ralph Wolfe) A SHORT HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BACTERIOLOGY H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeal Concept and the World It Lives In: a Retrospective
    Carl R. Woese (center) with His Majesty Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden and Queen Silvia on the occassion of his receiving the 2003 Crafoord Prize, given by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Photo credit: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Photosynthesis Research 80: 361–372, 2004. 363 © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Personal perspective The archaeal concept and the world it lives in: a retrospective Carl R. Woese Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, B103 Chemical and Life Sciences Laboratory, 601 South Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801-3709, USA (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: +1-217-244-6697) Received 9 July 2003; accepted in revised form 30 August 2003 Key words: archaea, evolution, genomics, molecular phylogeny, phylogenetic reconstruction, ribosomal RNA Abstract The present retrospective concerns the discovery and development of the archaea, the so-called ‘third form of life’ that no one anticipated and many did not, and still do not want. In its birth pangs, which the archaea had a plenty, the concept encountered biology unmasked; for it ran up against some of the key struts in the 20th century biological edifice. Consequently, the history of the development of the archaeal concept provides an excellent window on certain of the weaknesses in the 20th century biology paradigm, weaknesses that have now led that paradigm to a conceptual dead end. On the other hand, the archaeal concept has also provided us one of the pillars on which a new holistic paradigm for biology can be built. So, it would seem of value to retrace some of the twists and turns in the history of the development of the archaeal concept.
    [Show full text]
  • F: Acknowledgements
    Appendix F Acknowledgements OTA wishes to acknowledge the many people con- James E. Bowman tributed to the preparation of this report. Members of University of Chicago the advisory panel and contractors are listed at the Elbert Branscomb front of the report. Workshop participants are listed Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in appendix C. Others helped by commenting on drafts Douglas Brutlag of the report, providing information or advice, or con- Stanford University senting to interviews with OTA staff. OTA particularly thanks those at the National Institutes of Health, the Martin Buechi Department of Energy, the National Science Founda- Embassy of Switzerland tion, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and other John Burris organizations for their invaluable efforts to inform National Academy of Sciences OTA about their activities. Our gratitude is extended to: Andrew Bush Carlos Abella U.S. Senate Embassy of Spain Mark Cantley Bruce M. Alberts Commission of the European Economic Community University of California al San Francisco Charles R. Cantor Duane Alexander College of Physicians and Surgeons of National Institute of Child Health and Human Columbia University Development C. Thomas Caskey Norman Anderson Baylor College of Medicine Large Scale Biology James Cassatt Wyatt Anderson National Institute of General Medical Sciences University of Georgia James W. Chamberlain David G. Baldwin U.S. Embassy, Brazil Tetrarch Inc. Andrew T. L. Chen David Baltimore Centers for Disease Control Whitehead Institute James F. Childress Phil Beachy University of Virginia Carnegie Institution of Washington George M. Church George I. Bell Harvard University Medical School Los Alamos National Laboratory Mary Clutter Celeste Berg National Science Foundation Carnegie Institution of Washington Stanley Cohen Fred Bergmann Stanford Medical School National Institute of General Medical Sciences Francis Collins Michel Bernon University of Michigan Embassy of France P.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Methods
    CONCEPTS AND PART METHODS I THE CONCEPT CHAPTER OF MICROBIAL SPECIES 1 INTRODUCTION Chapter contents What distinguishes microbiology from other disciplines of biology? This question no longer has a straightforward answer that can satisfy all biologists. The traditional answer focused Old and new challenges for assessing on the extremely small size of organisms under investigation; however, this leaves little room microbial diversity for distinction on the basis of taxonomy because practically all organisms have a microscopic Traditional concepts of species stage during their life cycles. Some organisms that are physiologically closely related to large Typological species concept macroscopic organisms spend their entire life span as microscopic organisms. Nevertheless, Morphological species concept physical size remains a dominant conceptual framework for most practicing microbiologists, Biological species concept and most of the discussion in this book is presented from this perspective. Other responses Evolutionary species concept have focused on unicellularity (as opposed to multicellularity) as the defining characteristic Other concepts of microorganisms, however, viruses are acellular, and many investigators have argued that the so-called unicellular stage of bacteria, for example, is not a naturally occurring phe- Species concepts for prokaryotes nomenon. Some investigators have advanced the cellularity argument by invoking differen- tiation as the separating principle, but many “unicellular” organisms also go through Theoretical mechanisms
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Information Encoding in Nucleic Acids Through a Dissipation-Replication Relation Arxiv:1804.05939V1 [Physics.Bio-Ph]
    Origin of Information Encoding in Nucleic Acids through a Dissipation-Replication Relation Juli´anMej´ıa1 and Karo Michaelian2 April 18, 2018 [1] Postgrado in Physical Sciences, Instituto de F´ısica,Universidad Nacional Aut´onomade M´exico,Apartado Postal 20-364, M´exicoD. F. 01000, M´exico. [2] Department of Nuclear Physics and Application of Radiation, Instituto de F´ısica,Universidad Nacional Aut´onomade M´exico,Apartado Postal 20-364, M´exicoD. F. 01000, M´exico. karo@fisica.unam.mx; [email protected] Abstract Ultraviolet light incident on organic material can initiate its spontaneous dissipative structuring into chro- mophores which can then catalyze their own replication. This may have been the case for one of the most ancient of all chromophores dissipating the Archean UVC photon flux, the nucleic acids. Under the empirically established imperative of increasing entropy production, nucleic acids with affinity to particular amino acids which foment UVC photon dissipation would have been \thermodynamically selected" through this dissipation- replication relation. Indeed, we show here that those amino acids with characteristics most relevant to fo- menting UVC photon dissipation are precisely those with greatest affinity to their codons or anticodons. This could provide a physical-chemical mechanism for the accumulation of information in nucleic acids relevant to the dissipation of the externally imposed photon potential. This mechanism could provide a non-equilibrium thermodynamic foundation, based on increasing global entropy production of the biosphere, for the tenants of Darwinian natural selection. We show how this mechanism might have begun operating at the origin of life in the Archean, and how, in fact, it still operates today, albeit indirectly through complex biosynthetic pathways now operating in the visible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tangled Tree: a Radical New History of Life by David Quammen, ISBN: 978-1476776620
    The Tangled Tree: A Radical New History of Life by David Quammen, ISBN: 978-1476776620 David Quammen’s The Tangled Tree is an absolute delight. In many ways, it feels like a biography of Carl Woese, the microbiologist who defined the domain of Archaea in 1977. Despite over 40 years having passed since then, Woese’s definition challenged our fundamental understanding of evolutionary biology. However, The Tangled Tree is more than just a biography—calling it that does an insult to the work and the writer—it’s more like a biographical history of evolutionary biology. Quammen declares in his introduction “this book is about a new method of telling that story [of life], a new method of deducing it, and certain unexpected insights that have flowed from the new method. The method has a name: molecular phylogenetics.” The line that follows illustrates the engaging tone Quammen takes throughout the book (and the wordiness): “Wrinkle your nose at that fancy phrase, if you will, and I’ll wrinkle with you, but, in fact, what it means is fairly simple: reading the deep history of life and the patterns of relatedness from the sequence of constituent units in certain long molecules, as those molecules exist today within living creatures.” In other words, “molecular phylogenetics” means using patterns in DNA, RNA, and certain proteins to determine how life evolved on Earth. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. The Human Genome project largely concluded in 2003, and researchers have been charting the genome of various species for quite some time now. Scientists have long known that the key to evolution lies in DNA—perhaps not only ours, but that of other organisms, namely single-celled nucleus-less ones, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Evolution in the 21St Century
    Revisiting Evolution in the 21st Century James A. Shapiro Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Chicago OCTOBER 3, 2010 Disentangling basic issues in evolutionary debates 1. Origin of life & the first cells - still on the fringes of serious scientific discussion 2. Descent with modification of related living organisms - more convincing with each new technological advance (e.g. detailed protein and genome phylogenies) - but more complicated than simple vertical inheritance 3. The actual processes of evolutionary change over time - an ever growing number of distinct documented cellular and molecular events different from conventional predictions - novel molecular possibilities of genome reorganization as we learn more about how cells interact and control genome structure Outstanding Questions Still at Issue in 21st Century Evolutionary Theory • Where does novelty come from in evolution? (Nothing for selection to do with no differences.) • Descent with modification: tree/web of life? how many cell types in the beginning? role of virosphere? • Nature of heredity and hereditary change: vertical/ horizontal transmission, passive/active variations, micro/macromutations, isolated/interactive germ plasm, Central Dogma still valid? • Role of selection: positive/neutral/purifying? • Relationship of evolutionary change to planetary, environmental & ecological events? Major Points 1. The focus in biology has changed from mechanics to informatics. Cells are sensitive and communicative information-processing entities. 2. Cell-generated hereditary innovation is the source of new features in evolution. 3. Genome change is a cell-regulated process, not a series of accidents. (Genome as RW, not ROM, memory system) 4. The DNA record tells us that major steps in genome evolution have involved rapid genome-wide changes.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Microbial Ecology?
    Class Business: Reading materials on course website http://fire.biol.wwu.edu/cmoyer/cmoyer.BI405.html Field trips (e.g. H2S scrubber at VRI and water treatment plant) – arrive early and stay late What is microbial ecology? A microbial view of the world “…the science that explores the interrelationships between microorganisms and their living (biotic) and nonliving (abiotic) environments” -- R. Atlas and R. Bartha, 1998 Ecology was a term first coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866. Oikos (household/dwelling) + logos (law) Î “law of the household” Microbial ecology was a term that came into use in the 1960’s. History of Microbiology Antonie van Leeuwenhoek observes “animacules” (1676) 1600’s Spallazani argues against spontaneous generation of microbes (1768) Needham argues for spontaneous 1700’s generation of microbes (1745) Schloesing and Muntz: Saussure: oxidation of H by soil, Koch: isolation of pure 2 Pasteur: microbial ammonium oxidation attributed to microbes (1839) fermentation (biodegradation (nitrification) in sewage cultures and Koch’s of organic substances) by passing through postulates (1883-1884) 1800’s (1857-1876) sand (1879) Carl Woese recognizes that Fleming notices inhibition of Archaea are distinct from Micrococcus by Penicillium factor (1929) Bacteria (1977) 1900’s The first complete nucleotide sequence of a bacterial genome is completed (1995) 1866 1 “Work with impure cultures yields nothing but nonsense and Penicillium glaucum” – Oscar Brefeld, 1881 An impure culture… horrors! Koch’s Postulates Isolation of single colonies
    [Show full text]