Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters João Pedro Ribeiro dos Santos Mestrado de Biologia Funcional e Biotecnologia de Plantas Departamento de Biologia 2017/2018 Orientador Olga Maria Oliveira da Silva Lage, Professora Auxiliar, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto.
Todas as correções determinadas pelo júri, e só essas, foram efetuadas. O Presidente do Júri, Porto, ______/______/______
FCUP I Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters
Resumo
O longo período de adaptação na terra aos mais diversos ambientes permitiu ás bactérias um grande desenvolvimento das capacidades metabólicas. Muitas espécies têm relações muito próximas com plantas, favorecendo o seu crescimento de diversas maneiras. Estas bactérias incluem espécies presentes na rizosfera, rizóbios e outros promotores de crescimento vegetal bacterianos (PGPB - Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria). Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a possível capacidade de diferentes bactérias de água doce e marinhas, selecionadas a partir de uma grande coleção de cultura, para favorecerem o crescimento de plantas, nomeadamente Arabidopsis thaliana e Solanum lycopersicum. A primeira foi escolhida devido ao seu uso frequente em trabalhos científicos, enquanto que a segunda foi escolhida por causa do seu valor e interesse agro-económico. Foram três os parâmetros que permitiram a seleção de candidatos a PGPB, a solubilização de fosfato, a produção de acido índole-3-acético (IAA) e a formação de biofilme. Os quatro Planctomycetes testados (duas estirpes de Rhodopirellula báltica e duas estirpes de Rhodopirellula rubra), três Proteobacteria (Vibrio estirpe UAP 11, Halomonas estirpe UAP 6 e Marinomonas estirpe SAP 28) assim como o Firmicute Bacillus estirpe A(2)_12 foram usados para ensaios de co-cultura. Os ensaios foram feitos usando três meios diferentes de crescimento bacteriano (dois marinhos – Marine agar e M607; e um de água doce – Nutrient agar). Devido ao elevado nível de compostos orgânicos presentes nos meios Marine agar e Nutriente agar, o desenvolvimento das plantas foi muito afetado nos controlos e nas co-culturas, ocorrendo morte das plantas. Nas experiências onde o meio M607 foi usado (com as estirpes dos Planctomycetes) o desenvolvimento de ambas as plantas foi no geral, comparável com os dos controlos. Apesar de várias bactérias apresentarem características PGP, o seu potencial uso como promotoras do crescimento das plantas não pode ser confirmado.
Palavras Chave: Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, Promotores de crescimento de plantas, Planctomycetes¸ Solubilização de fosfato, Produção de IAA, Formação de biofilme, cocultura de planta-bactéria. Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters
FCUP II Abstract The longest life adaptation period on earth to the most diverse environments allowed bacteria to develop a huge range of metabolic capacities. Many species have an intimate relationship with plants, favouring their growth in many aspects. These bacteria include species in the rhizosphere, rhizobia and other plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB). This work aimed to assess the possible capacity of several marine and freshwater bacteria, selected from a large culture collection, to favour the development and growth of plants, namely Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum. These plants were chosen because of the common use in scientific works of the first one and the agronomical interest of the second. The capacity of the chosen bacteria to solubilize phosphate, to produce the phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and to form biofilm were the three parameters that allowed the selection of PGPB candidates. The four Planctomycetes tested (two strains of Rhodopirellula baltica and two strains of Rhodopirellula rubra), three Proteobacteria: Vibrio strain UAP 11, Halomonas strain UAP 6 and Marinomonas strain SAP28 as well as the Firmicutes Bacillus strain A(2)_12 were used for a further co-culture assay. The assays were performed using three different media to grow the bacteria (two saline media - Marine agar and M607 and a non-saline medium - Nutrient agar). Due to the high levels of organic compounds present in Marine agar and Nutrient agar, plant development was very affected in control and co-culture assays occuring plant death. In the experiment where medium M607 was used (with the strains of Planctomycetes), the development of both plants was, in general, comparable to the one of the control plants. Although several bacteria showed to possess PGP abilities, their potential use for the promotion of plant growth could not be confirmed.
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana, Solanum lycopersicum, Plant growth promoting bacteria, Planctomycetes, Phosphate solubilization, IAA production, Biofilm formation, Plantbacteria co-culture assay.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters III
Index Resumo ...... I Abstract ...... II Index ...... III Table Index ...... V Figure Index ...... VI Abbreviations ...... VII Introduction ...... 1 Importance of plants in nature ...... 1 Plant Applications ...... 3 Problems faced by plants ...... 4 Microorganisms and Plant interactions ...... 7 Symbiotic relations ...... 7 The rhizosphere ...... 7 Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) ...... 10 Phyla of The Bacteria Used ...... 11 Actinobacteria ...... 11 Firmicutes ...... 12 Bacteroidetes ...... 13 Proteobacteria ...... 13 Planctomycetes ...... 14 Plants Used ...... 15 Arabidopsis thaliana ...... 15 Solanum lycopersicum ...... 16 Importance of Phosphorous ...... 17 Formation of Biofilm and Exopolysaccharide production ...... 17 Objectives ...... 18 Materials and methods ...... 18 Biological material and growth conditions ...... 18 Bacteria PGP experiments ...... 20 Phosphate solubilization ...... 20 IAA production by bacteria ...... 20 Biofilm formation by bacteria ...... 23 Co-cultures of Plant and Bacteria ...... 23 FCUP IV Conclusion ...... 36 References ...... 37
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters V
Table Index
Table 1 List of all the bacteria used in this study...... 19 Table 2 Positive results of the phosphate solubilization assay and comparison between Pikovskaya (PVK) and NBRIP medium...... 25 Table 3 Data collected from the co-culture assay of the selected bacterial strains with Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum...... 32
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters VI
Figure Index
Figure 1 Reaction intensity according to the concentration of IAA for the standard curves...... 21 Figure 2 Standard curves of the Salkowski reactions for the detection of IAA...... 22 Figure 3 Scheme of the co-culture apparatus...... 24 Figure 4 Cultures on NBRIP medium where the phosphate solubilization halos are visible around the bacteria...... 25 Figure 5 Levels of IAA production by all bacteria under study...... 28 Figure 6 Levels of biofilm formation by the different bacterial cultures with a concentration of 10-6 stained with crystal violet at 500nm...... 30 Figure 7 Arabidopsis thaliana cultures...... 33 Figure 8 Co-culture in glass test tubes of Solanum lycopersicum with some selected bacteria...... 34
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters VII
Abbreviations ANOVA Analysis of variance BC Before Christ DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid EPS Exopolysaccharide IAA Indole-3-acetic acid IBA Indole-3-butyric acid MA Marine agar MB Marine broth MS Murashige & Skoog NA Nutrient agar NB Nutrient broth NBRIP National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate nod Nodulation OD Optical density PAA Phenylacetic acid PBS Phosphate-buffered saline PGP Plant growth promoter PGPB Plant growth promoting bacteria PGPR Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria PUL Polysaccharide utilization loci PVK Pikovskaya RNA Ribonucleic acid rpm Rotations per minute rRNA Ribosome Ribonucleic acid
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 1
Introduction
A big part of our planet is covered by plants. Without plants a clear majority of life, such as the human life, would not exist. Plants are everywhere, in our homes, gardens, roadsides, farm fields and their presence is essential for instance clean air, food, and water. Many countries and many people rely on plants and their products for their livelihood and respective economy. Plants, unlike animals, can produce their own food by a process known as photosynthesis. They can store the photosynthetic products in the form of carbohydrates, with the use of light, carbon dioxide and water. The produced carbohydrates are used by the plants for their vital needs and the remnants are stored in certain organs such as the plant fruits, leaves or seeds. Besides carbohydrates, plants are the largest source of vitamins (Young and Pellett, 1994). Animals cannot produce vitamins and must acquire them in their food.
Importance of plants in nature
Plants play fundamental roles in nature. They occupy the base of the trophic chain. For a clear majority of the animals besides being a food source, plants provide vital shelter and environment for reproduction. Furthermore, through photosynthesis they are fundamental key players in the production of oxygen. Almost all living organisms use oxygen in their metabolic process and then emit carbon dioxide. The ratio between oxygen and carbon dioxide levels is maintained mostly thanks to the photosynthetic process which all plants possess. This process that has as objective the production of carbohydrates also emits oxygen as a final product (Orr et al., 2017). As plants influence climate by altering humidity levels, rainfall periods and temperature they interfere with life on earth. A location where a high vegetation density is present can absorb more heat without becoming bad for health than a desertic location with a large lack of plants (Ng et al., 2012). Another equilibrium that plants provide to the environment and several ecosystems is the prevention of soil erosion (Körner, 2004). Plants provide natural protection against erosion in several ways. Leaves intercept raindrops reducing the physical impact, while on soils plant roots bind the particles in the soil, protecting it from being washed away by heavy rain. Also, the canopy prevents the extreme drying effect of sunlight. Many tragedies like landslides associated with hurricanes and several storms FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 2 occur in areas where forests have been cleared and hillsides left bare (Bennell and Verbyla, 2008). When vegetation is dense, the area occupied by roots is denser and harder, which stops the wind erosion, prevents the top layer of the soil to be blown away slowly (Bird et al., 1993). Also, the shadow cast upon the ground by the canopy of tall plants can reduce the heat and maintain humidity levels. One way they do this is through the cooling effect caused by respiration leading to rainfall. Therefore, a location without vegetation tends to be completely dry. Due to human activities, in some areas, soils can become contaminated with heavy metals, radioactive elements or other toxins. Plants can clean such soils as they have the capacity to accumulate and concentrate higher levels of such toxic elements without suffering damage. There are plants well adapted to these polluted environments such as Brassica juncea, Cynodon dactylon, Festuca rubra, Typha latifolia and Phragmites australis which are used in phytoremediation (Wong, 2003, Kumar et al., 1995).
In our societies, there is an increase in gaseous pollution like CO2, CO and SO2, which is for instance due to factory and car emissions, that by ejecting gases to the environment and reducing the oxygen ratio in the air, make it highly polluted and unsafe. Forest and green spaces purify air, by filtering particles and providing chemical reactions where pollutants are detoxified. Forest trees and other plants also store carbon. If it was not for the carbon sink provided by plants, the rate of CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere would be almost twice as high as it is today (Keenan et al., 2016). To fight the effect of overly producing toxic gases, measures like place plants in roadsides and public parks help in the decrease of the “pollution cloud” although faraway from effective. Since long, plants are known to have pesticide (insecticide, fungicide, bactericide, herbicide) properties such as the Azadirachta indica (Neem) (Ahmed and Grainge, 1986). These natural pesticides do not harm the soil and do not last long in the environment because they are degraded over time (e.g. Pyrethrin from Chysanthemum cinerariaefolium is a mosquito repellent used long ago). Pyrethroids act as insecticides, killing insects effectively before their decomposition into harmless products (Ensley, 2012). Azadirachta indica, is another plant producing insecticide widely used in India and Africa, especially for controlling insect pests in stored grains (Ahmed and Grainge, 1986). Plants tend to compensate suboptimal conditions or attacks (from herbivorous/pathogens) by moulding some of their internal process and redirecting energy. Some of this compensation have an initial response that is associated with metabolic changes in plant tissue by moving the metabolic paths from bad/damaged FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 3 tissue to the efficient/healthy ones. One example of this is the fact that a healthy leaf may photosynthesize at a faster rate than a damaged one which has a reduced photosynthetic capacity (Harris, 1974). In 1985, Bush and Evans observed that in rice the daylight length influenced the duration of anthesis and flower initiation. This daylight length influenced the balance of production and storage of photo assimilates (Evans, 1985). Plant productivity does not only derive from photosynthesis but also by the utilization of carbon reserves. The plants possess two types of reserves, the short-term or pathway storage and the mid-term or the organ storage. The storage pathway often occurs during daylight and appears in the source of the products, in tissues associated with transport normally in the form of sugars. Organ storage compensates small falls in the photosynthesis being one example the stem reserves in cereals (Gaunt, 1995). The adaptation levels of plants can occur naturally or by anthropogenic hands, through with selective breeding and through some scientific techniques (e.g. organisms genetically modified, mutants and hybrids) has altered the physiological processes in plants.
Plant Applications
The most important applications of plants is their utilization as a food source for many organisms including mankind. But besides this fundamental use, plants fulfil many of other human needs. Plants are the largest source of textile and fabric materials usually eco-friendly, and less expensive than non-plant derivate materials. Materials like cotton, jute which contributes for manufacturing yarn and other clothing are some of the examples of plant derivate textiles. This use back to 8000BC. Fibres from over 2000 species are used, being flax, hemp and cotton amongst the best known and most widely used today (Smole et al., 2013). Before cotton being widely available in Europe, the fibres of the common stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) were used for making cloths (Bacci et al., 2009). Even today the leaves of many other well know plants which produce high-quality fibres, such as bananas and pineapples are used for making ropes and cloths (Elanchezhian et al., 2018). Plants have been used for cosmetic purposes since ancient times, from Egyptians who used olive oil perfumed with aromatic plants to keep their skin supple, to the modern days (Athar and Nasir, 2005). Plants extracts are widely used for cleansing and beauty FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 4 purposes. One of the oldest and best-known plant oil is derived from lavender plant Lavandula (Lis-Balchin, 2002), (the Latin lavare means wash), after the widespread roman practise of using lavender flowers into their baths. Hair rinses and shampoos containing camomile (Chamaemelum nobile) are popular nowadays amongst those with blond hair. The importance of camomile was recognised by the Vikings who were known to have used the flowers to enhance their blonde braids. It was also honoured in their mythology and was one of the “sacred herbs” given to the gods by Wodan (Castleman, 2001). Plants are the base for most furniture. Wood is used to build our houses, wardrobes, chairs, tables, doors. Because of its features like durability, stylish textures and resistance to temperature changes, some have the capacity to isolate sound and keep places warm. Plants have formed the basis of traditional medicines for thousands of years. The oldest record dates to the Mesopotamia 2600BC and include the use of cedar, cypress, liquorice, myrrh and opium poppy (Borchardt, 2002). Traditional medicine continues to be based on plants, as for example, in the Indian medicine, 26 different plant families were tested to prove their benefits and 72 % showed antimicrobial activity (Srinivasan et al., 2001). In 1990 Chinese doctors used 700,000 tons of plant material and in 1994 2 billion dollars of plant drugs were exported from China. Several modern medicines derivate from plants, like opium poppy that is the source of morphine and codeine (Struempler, 1987). Taxus baccata (Yew) which possess taxol, was recently found that it can act as a novel drug used to fight cancer (Malik et al., 2011). Plants are excellent source of medicines for life-threatening diseases. Together with microbes such as bacteria, plants can have an improved nutritional value, either naturally or through modern technology such as “Recombinant DNA technology” (Ooms et al., 1981, Ye et al., 2000). Biofuel is a more modern application attributed to plants (Weng et al., 2008). They can be used to generate electricity and power. Plant fuel is less toxic since it does not produce harmful gases and its raw material is cheaper.
Problems faced by plants
Humankind is affecting our planet in many ways. In the past few centuries the changes in society and the increasing rate of development meant that the scale of these impacts has greatly grown (Cardinale et al., 2012). There are many threats to the natural resources of our planet that influence directly plants. These include habitat loss and FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 5 degradation, invasive aliens, over-exploitation of resources and even climate change (Rathcke and Jules, 1993, Sax et al., 2002, Gurevitch and Padilla, 2004, Helm et al., 2005). Humans are the main cause of extinction and the principal threat to species at risk of extinction. Climate change induced by humans is increasingly recognised as one of the most serious threats for nature (Linden, 2014). Over-exploitation, resource extraction and intensive agriculture threatens many species of plants (especially the native ones). The introduction of alien species also endangers the local ecosystem, because of us plants can populate a foreign place/habitat deliberately or unintentionally (by organisms hitch-hiking in containers, ships, cars or soil). Pollution and disease that spreads throughout the ecosystem where plants live and therefore they receive damage, has a serious consequence, where the trophic chains that have plants as an important and irreplaceable piece/link are broken and discontinued. Plants can be affected by several diseases and plagues. This is the case of some historic episodes like the “potato famine” caused by Phytopthora infestans (a reemerging infectious pathogens) between 1845 and 1849 which caused the population of Ireland to decline about 20% from starvation (Fry, 2008, Lehsten et al., 2017). Coffee rust caused by the fungus Hemileia vastatrix is a coffee plant disease with devastating effects on coffee plantations, that causes damage where more than 60% of the plant lose at least 80% of their leaves and other 30% of plants do not have leaves at all. Was discovered in 1867 by Berkeley and Broome (Kushalappa and Eskes, 1989). In the British colony Ceylon, now known as Sri Lanka more than 90% of coffee crops were wiped out and as a consequence, tea went from an almost unknown beverage to the drink of choice in European society (Cressey, 2013). Cassava (Manihot esculent) is affect by the Cassava mosaic virus and Brown streak virus. In the regions of eastern and southern Africa over 70 million of people that depend on cassava as the primary food source contributing over 500Kcal per day are affected (Fauquet and Fargette, 1990). Due to the continuous evolution of pathogens and their airborne spread, Triticum aestivum and other species (wheat) productions are in danger worldwide. The impact is more evident in East Africa, North Africa, Middle east and Asia which are the major wheat producers. It is estimated that 37% of worlds wheat production is at risk of succumb to epidemies such as yellow, stern or leaf virus diseases (Singh et al., 2011, Singh et al., 2015). FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 6
Based on economic/scientific relevance, many other diseases due to virus can be evidenced: (i) Tobacco mosaic virus; (ii) Tomato spotted wilt virus; (iii) Tomato yellow leaf curl virus; (iv) Cucumber mosaic virus; (v) Potato virus Y; (vi) Cauliflower mosaic virus; (vii) African cassava mosaic virus; (viii) Plum pox virus; (ix) Brome mosaic virus and (x) Potato virus X (Scholthof et al., 2011). In plants, fungal infection occurs generally through a common pattern, spores or vegetative cells of fungi encounter the plant. The fungus penetrates the surface of its target through wounds, stomata and other openings in the plant cell and the infection occurs with the fungi growing in either the intracellular or intercellular region. Surrounding tissues are invaded, and the pathogen spreads throughout the plant (Gerdemann, 1968). Depending on the pathogen, death of the plant may be observed in a few days or a few weeks. When pathogenic bacteria affect plants, generally display several hydrolytic enzymes for penetration of the plant surface, and growth within the plant is generally intercellular between the parenchyma cells. With the progression of the disease in the plant, bacterial distribution may become systemic because of migration and transport into the vascular tissue (Genre et al., 2005). An example of the enzymes used by the bacteria is the release of pectinase that hydrolyses the plant cell walls and the plant collapses(Zhao et al., 2013). Plant disease is a problem that allows a rich and diverse area for research, being necessary many fields like mycology, bacteriology, virology, entomology, nematology, epidemiology, plant breeding and food safety. The level of threat from a disease is determined by the degree of infection, colonization, and damage of host tissue (Gaunt, 1995). When nutrients, water and other conditions are optimal, biomass production depends mostly on sunlight. Crop productivity can be related to the duration and levels of green area. Reduced yield is often a consequence of inefficient interception of radiation by damaged tissue with less photosynthetic capacity. Biomass production is related with healthy green areas in leaves, higher index of green area will have a higher productivity than a low index. (Loomis and Amthor, 1999, Liu et al., 2010) Plant stability associated with resistance to diseases and pests as well as tolerance to climate changes constitute the most desirable socioeconomic-biologic traits (Voytas and Gao, 2014).
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 7
Microorganisms and Plant interactions
Symbiotic relations
Symbiosis is the relation that two or more living organisms establish between themselves, some of them are so close that the composition of the members is classified as a single unit, like lichens. Symbiosis range from parasitism, where one-member benefits and negatively harms the other (note that the harming effects may only show much later from where the relation started which can induce false parasitism) to commensalism in which one or more of the partners benefits and the other part stays unharmed or not perturbed (Casadevall and Pirofski, 2000). Mutualism is where all the individuals involved benefit from the partnership. This type of relation has as an example endosymbiosis (endosymbiosis leads many theories explaining certain organelles within Eukaryotic cells) (Martin et al., 2015). Another type of endosymbiosis is the digestive one, a partnership composed mostly between a microorganism and the hosts digestive track, like the example of humans and their intestinal microbiome (McFall-Ngai, 2002).
The rhizosphere
Soil is a complex substrate where the size of particles and presence of ions determine its capacity to act as a reservoir of water and provide nutrients to plants. Roots continually extract nutrients from the surrounding soil which allows a rapid growth in fresh soil. In the soil layer that is within a few millimetres from the root system exists the rhizosphere. The rhizosphere is composed by the surrounding soil and all associated microorganisms present. The term was first used by Lorenz Hiltner in 1904 and the organisms present includes bacteria, fungi, algae and protozoans (Anderson et al., 1993).
Mycorrhizae
Most of the planet vegetation have a relationship between their roots and mycorrhizal fungi (Berendsen et al., 2012). Apart from some families like the Cruciferae, Chenopodiaceae, Proteaceae and most aquatic plants which usually do not stablish this interaction (Taiz, 1980). In nature exists two principal types of mycorrhizal fungi connection, ectomycorrhizal and endomycorrhizal (Smith and Smith, 1997). FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 8
Small types of mycorrhizae exist as well such as the orchidaceous type, as orchid seeds need to stablish a relation with a specific fungus to germinate due to their low nutrient levels, until they develop photosynthetic tissue (Bonnardeaux et al., 2007, Johnson et al., 2007). Ectomycorrhizal is mycorrhizal fungi form a thin mantle of mycelium in the surface of the roots. During the growth process of plants, mucilage is secreted at the root tip and entraps materials released from the root. The pH of this area is acidic because of proton secretion. The fungi penetrate the root, growing between epidermal cells or through root hairs and invades cortex cells. Infection by fungi in these intercellular areas, produces a compact mass of fungal hyphae that is referred to as “The hartig net”. The hyphae that are much thinner than the plant roots have a better absorption capacity of nutrients and help plants grow. This type of mycorrhizal fungi only infects tree species (Clarkson, 1985). Contrary to ectotrophic fungi, endomycorrhizal englobes subtypes of mycorrhizae, like ericoid mycorrhizal, the orchidaceous mycorrhiza and the vesiculararbuscular mycorrhiza. The arbuscular mycorrhizal do not form the mantle involving the root, it produces a less denser hyphae web, both inside the root and growing outward from the root to the surrounding area. Not only do the fungus penetrates the intercellular space between epidermis and cortex cells as well it penetrates the cells itself where they form vesicular like structures and branched arbuscular structures. These arbuscules make sites for nutrient exchange between host plant and mycorrhizal fungus (Taiz, 1980, Taiz and Zeiger, 2002). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal mostly associate with herbaceous angiosperms (Smith and Smith, 1997). The interaction between vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizae and roots makes the uptake of phosphorus and metals an easier process, by going beyond the depletion zone of the nutrients around the root. Ectotrophic can also absorb and make phosphorous available for the plant (Smith and Smith, 1997). Rhizosphere interactions are influenced by the number of microorganisms, type and specific root exudates (Bais et al., 2006). One benefit of a plant having mycorrhizal fungus is the trapping of nutrients. This is observed during periods of rain when nutrients are washed from the leaf litter into the soil but are immobilized in the mycorrhizal mantel before they can be carried out of the root zone (van der Heijden, 2010). Plants placed in nutrient deficient soils will not grow unless appropriate mycorrhizal fungi are added. Conifers, deciduous broadleaf trees, oaks, beech, eucalyptus and hickory are examples of hosts for the mycorrhizal fungi. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 9
When in fertile soils, the mutualist relation between the mycorrhizae and the plants may shift to a parasitic one. Where the fungus still receives the carbohydrates that the plant produces, but the plant no longer benefits from the fungus presence (Brundrett, 1991, George et al., 1995).
Bacterial symbiosis with plants
Bacterial symbiosis with plants occurs differently from that of the fungi symbiosis. The plant root secretes specific chemicals known as flavonoids and these signalling molecules attract bacteria growing in the rhizosphere. These flavonoids also induce transcription of nod genes in the bacterial genome to produce lipochitin oligosaccharides called nod factors. The plant root recognizes the chemical structure of the nod factors, and these lipochitin oligo molecules are taken up by the receptor kinases. The nod factors activate the plant hair roots and the symbiotic bacteria attach onto the root hairs and enter the root by a process known as root infection. Now in the interior of the root, bacteria crop a lipopolysaccharide capsule that enables the rhizobia to evade plant defences systems and enter the root by a structure designated as infection thread. Phytohormones are produced by the bacteria to stimulate root cell division and the plant root expands quickly to produce a nodule. Bacteria in the nodule adjust to the lownitrogen enviroment and the reduced oxygen level in the nodule. In some cases, the bacteria differentiate to produce rounded cells or cells with Y shape, these are called bacteroids and these cellular units are important in fixing nitrogen. Many rhizobia produce chemicals that stimulate plant growth, and these chemicals have a molecular structure similar to plant hormones. Many bacteria produce growth promoting compounds including auxins gibberellins, cytokinin, ethylene and abscisic acid. These plant-like hormones are produced by free-living bacteria as well as symbiotic bacteria and pathogenic strains of rhizosphere microorganisms. A simple example of the plant/bacteria symbiosis is the symbiosis with cactus, bacteria enable cactus to grow in the harshest of terrestrial environments, these bacteria are found as endophytes of the plant and are present in the cactus seeds. The characterization of these seed-borne bacteria supports the idea that these symbionts maybe vertically inherited and improve drought tolerance (Fonseca-García et al., 2016).These endophytic bacteria continue to grow in the roots of the cactus with the continuous secretion of organic acids and fixation of nitrogen (Puente et al., 2009) Although, the most abundant element in the atmosphere is nitrogen, its molecular form in the air is highly inert and unavailable to plants. Microorganisms that can fix atmospheric nitrogen are called diazotrophs (Delmont et al., 2017) and the machinery FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 10 required for atmospheric nitrogen fixation is found only in prokaryotes, which can be symbiotic in plants: In the symbiotic relation is simple, the plant provides the carbohydrates and energy source for the bacteria to grow, while the bacteria fix nitrogen with the production of amino acids for plant growth. Plants have specific bacteria such as Azospirillum, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (Pedraza et al., 2004) as partners and these convert atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia using a complex enzyme system known as nitrogenase (Kim and Rees, 1994). In an ecosystem rich in vegetation ammonia deposition and its contribution to nitrogen levels usable by plants is significant (Artyomov et al., 1994). The ion NH4+ has very high rates of absorption in roots because of the presence of pumps in the cells membranes with high affinity to ammonium. Symbiotic relations with nitrogen fixing microorganisms is a major contribution of N nutrition for plants, especially in poor soils or some well-aerated agriculture soils where N levels are low. Inside root nodules, the levels of ammonium are much higher than in the space outside the nodule because of the bacteroids that nitrogen (Stewart, 1977, Masclaux-Daubresse et al., 2010).
Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB)
Microbes in their interaction with plants are not only beneficial for plant productivity but can also benefit the plant by acting as biofertilizers, promoters of phytostimulation, function as biopesticides or bio-remediators (Lugtenberg et al., 2002). PGPB are bacteria that establish a symbiotic relation of mutualism with the host plant. These partnerships can have different levels of proximity ranging from being endophytic to inhabiting the surrounding areas of the roots in the soil (Siddiqui, 2006). Plant/microbe interactions can occur through different mechanisms and in different levels, from a simple root surface colonization to a molecular interaction (Moreira et al., 2016). To be consider PGPB, a bacterium needs to have some characteristics (Bishnoi et al., 2015). It must be able to survive and multiply itself in a microhabitat associated with a plant and the microbe needs to promote plant growth and development. Plant treatments with PGPB can improve the seed germination, the vigour of the seedlings and seed weight (Zahran, 2001). These microbes can belong to the plant rhizosphere which are determinants for the plant health. Roots release many compounds that might attract some bacteria or even give significant tools for their cycles (Badri and Vivanco, 2009). PGPB that enhance plant growth directly or indirectly such as making nutrients more available for plants like performing nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 11
In 1888 Martinus Beijerinck isolated and cultured nodules from different legume species, these bacteria were placed in the genus Rhizobium (rhiza = root; bios = life) (Hirsch, 2009). Plant physiology and development can be directly or indirectly influenced by PGPB. The direct influence includes nitrogen fixation, solubilization or altering the availability of mineral nutrients (like phosphorous and iron), induction of systemic resistance, alteration or production of the phytohormones such as auxins, cytokinin, gibberellins or ethylene. Indirect stimulus is generally associated with biocontrol, through the production of antibiotics, exopolysaccharides such as enzymes that hydrolyse fungal cell wall or chelation of Fe in the rhizosphere (Sasirekha and Srividya, 2016, Glick, 2012, Bharti et al., 2013, Glick, 2014). Examples of genera of Plant growth promoting microorganisms, PGP, includes, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Xanthomonas, and Klebsiella (Lugtenberg et al., 2002, Adesemoye et al., 2008).
Phyla of The Bacteria Used
Actinobacteria
Actinomycetales are an important order of the phylum Actinobacteria meaning “ray fungi” in Greek. The bacteria of this order are Gram positive bacteria form filamentous structures that fragment into coccoid or bacillary forms. They also develop branching filaments during their development (Sowani et al., 2017). Initially Actinobacteria were described by Ferdinand Cohn in 1875 when he observed a lacrimal concretion and noticed a filamentous organism which he decided to call Streptothrix foersteri (Buchanan, 1918). Individuals of this phylum can be encountered in a variety of habitats, such as soil, aquatic environments, food products and plant litter (Sowani et al., 2017). Some mediate the degradation of complex structures such as cellulose, lignin and chitin (Seyedsayamdost et al., 2012). These bacteria have a big history as pathogens, either being of plants (sweet potato rot) and animals (tuberculosis, pneumonia) (Martens and Demain, 2017). As a group that can synthesise a variety of metabolic products such as pigments, antibiotics, anticancer and several relevant enzymes (inhibitory enzymes), many are known to produce polyketide macrolides, being Erythromycin the first one to be approved for use in 1950s, isolated from Saccharopolyspora erythraea by McGuire in the 50s (Martens and Demain, 2017) followed by many more like pikromycin, FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 12 carbomycin, tylosin. Nine different cell walls have been detected based in the type of diaminopimelic acid (DAP) (Lechevalier and Lechevalier, 1970). Actinobacteria include aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Arachnia, Rothia and Bifidobacterium are some examples of the anaerobic genera. The aerobic group is much larger and includes the genera Gordonia, Rhodococcus and Nocardia. These last genera are known to cause infections in immunocompromised humans being opportunistic organisms that are commonly found in hospitals (Sowani et al., 2017). Even though some genera of Actinomycetales are consider the principal pathogens of this phylum (Actinomyces and Propionibacterium), the majority of the individuals responsible for actinomycoses are anaerobic or microaerophilic non-spore forming bacteria. Most actinomycotic infections involve several aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (Pulverer et al., 2003, Brook, 2012). and The genes that regulate the biosynthesis and production as well as the transport of natural products are clustered together in the organism’s genome (Seyedsayamdost et al., 2012), and recently the sequencing of the genome of actinomycetes showed several genes clusters with unknown products which means that the potential to produce relevant metabolites is higher than previously thought (Baltz, 2008). One big example of Actinobacteria helping plants, is the genus Frankia, known as a big nitrogen fixer, Frankia possess a specific lipid in their vesicles designed phenylacetic hopanetetrol (PAA) which exhibits the same effect in plants as the auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Hammad et al., 2003).
Firmicutes
Having over 250 genera in the human gut microbiome, like Lactobacillus, Mycoplasma and Streptococcus (Marciano and Vajro, 2017), the phylum Firmicutes (name from the Latin firmus and cutis which means strong cell referring to the bacteria cell walls), are known for being mostly Gram-positive bacteria having low levels of G-C nucleic acids. These bacteria can be found in various environments. Firmicutes can survive extreme conditions by having the capacity to produce desiccation resistant endospores (Kirsebom et al., 2012, Cote et al., 2015),. Sporulation is a drastic response that most Firmicutes have when under extreme conditions. The individual instead of proceeding to normal division forms an endospore. (Kirsebom et al., 2012, Cote et al., 2015). In several sugar cane processing environments, Firmicutes were the dominant phyla (Sharmin et al., 2013). They also have connections with uncommon environments where plants are protagonists, such as agriculture soils contaminated with arsenic and FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 13 irrigated with polluted water (Qamar et al., 2017). The Firmicutes isolates collected from this contaminated soil presented resistance to arsenic levels and were able to support plant growth (Qamar et al., 2017).
Bacteroidetes
Bacteroidetes is one of the major phyla of bacteria (Wexler, 2007). It is a very diverse phylum composed by three big classes of rod shaped, anaerobic or aerobic and nonsporing bacteria. They are present in almost every environment (Krieg et al,, 2010). Bacteroidetes form the biggest Gram-negative phylum inhabiting our digestive track, being their presence in our gut microbiome a sign of homeostasis (Gibiino et al., 2018). Together with Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes represent 99% of the bacteria in our digestive track (Marx, 2015). Bacteroidia is the most well studied class and includes the Bacteroides genus, which is abundant in the faeces of mammals. Early studies of this genus established that Bacteroides have the ability to recognise and metabolize plant derived polysaccharides by encoding a polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) that allows and facilitates the capture of glycans to the cell surface (Pope et al., 2012, Grondin et al., 2017). Besides degrading polysaccharides, they can also rebuild them by a process called “phase variation” (Foley et al., 2016, Gibiino et al., 2018). Bacteroides are in some cases key to restore the balance of intestinal track or correct an underdeveloped immune system in mice (Ivanov et al., 2008). Obesity, atherosclerosis and neurodegenerative diseases are all conditions that involve alterations of species from the Bacteroidetes (Mouzaki et al., 2013, Most et al., 2017). A tribe of Amerindians uncontacted by outside civilizations, the “Yanomami”, had one of the most diverse microbiome ever reported in a human group, including the Bacteroidetes. Although they had no previous contact with antibiotics, they possessed bacteria that could carry functional antibiotic resistance genes (Clemente et al., 2015).
Proteobacteria
Proteobacteria is one of the largest and most physiologically diverse phylum and they are abundant in every environment. The name Proteus comes from an early sea god that had the ability to change its form (Itävaara et al., 2016) All its members are Gramnegative bacteria divided in six subgroups. Alphaproteobacteria which includes nitrogenfixing bacteria, Agrobacterium and Rhizobium; Betaproteobacteria which can oxidize ammonia FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 14 or resist to arsenic contaminated soils (Burkholderiales); Gammaproteobacteria in which Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas and Acidithiobacillus are some of the more known genera; Deltaproteobacteria that some have the capacity to reduce iron and sulphur; Epsilonproteobacteria which englobes inhabitants of the digestive track of animals and can have symbiotic or pathogenic relations with their hosts and the Zetaproteobacteria that have only one member, the bacterium Mariprofundus ferrooxidans (Verma and Melcher, 2012). Alpha, Beta and Gammaproteobacteria have some species with the capacity to do anoxygenic photosynthesis (Camacho, 2009, Hanada, 2016). Some Beta and Gammaproteobacteria can utilize sulphide as an electron donor and even tolerate high concentrations of it. On the other hand, Alphaproteobacteria bacteria also can use it as electron donor, but not tolerate high concentrations. These three subgroups of Proteobacteria also have species that are chemolithotrophs and chemoorganotrophs (Simon and Kroneck, 2013). Delta and Epsilonproteobacteria are chemoorganotrophs. Some Proteobacteria like Pseudomonas fluoerescens can degrade hydrocarbon compounds by metabolizing certain components, which can degrade aliphatic compounds and Pseudomonas putida degrades aromatic compounds like naphthalene (Stauffer et al., 2008). Bio-remediation is another use for specific Proteobacteria, such as the Deltaproteobacteria Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans, which reduces important oxidized metals such as iron III and uranium IV, plus halogens by using them as terminal electron acceptors (Freitas et al., 2008).
Planctomycetes
The first planctomycete observed in 1924 by Nándor Gimesi was Planctomyces bekefii, which had a morphology like a planktonic fungus originating the name for the phylum, later in 2001 the phylum was scientifically proposed by Garrity and Holt (Garrity & Holt, 2001, Langó, 2005). This is a unique divergent phylum where its members display several special properties, rare in bacteria. Until recently it was believed that they possessed cell compartmentalization/ internal membrane structures, the chromosome was restricted to one compartment (Op den Camp et al., 2007, Vollmer, 2015). And that they did not possess peptidoglycan in its cell wall (Vollmer, 2015). Now it is known that instead of cellular compartments, they possess invaginations and their cell wall also possess peptidoglycans (Jeske et al., 2015). FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 15
They are still particular and possess a very large genome for prokaryotes, a complex cell plan, polar budding of its members, absence of division proteins FtsZ, membrane coatlike proteins and can perform endocytosis (Graça et al., 2016). Some Planctomycetes possess an unique physiology designated by Anammox, a process that involves a special organelle called anammoxosome (having organelles is rare for prokaryotes), which allows planctomycetes to oxidise ammonia anaerobically coupled with nitrate reduction. They also are able to use nitrogen dioxide or dinitrogen tetroxide as electron acceptor (Prosser, 2007). Planctomycetes can be white, orange and often pink, this last two pigmentations are often conferred by carotenoids (Cátia and Moreira, 2011, Fuerst, 2014). Carotenoids can be present in photosynthetic or non-photosynthetic tissues, and have important roles as light harvesting, protection against stress, light and oxidative damage or participate in membrane and protein structures (Armstrong, 1997, Tian et al., 2009). Planctomycetes are organisms with a slow growing rate and have a low need for carbon and nitrogen sources, which makes them difficult to isolate and grow in common media (Lage and Bondoso, 2012). Members of this phylum inhabit a wide variety of environments ranging from gut microbiome to the surface of marine algae. Planctomycetes were detected amongst the various phyla observed in the rhizosphere of plants, being the genera Pirellula and Gemmata the prominent ones (Qiao et al., 2017).
Plants Used
Arabidopsis thaliana
From all the flowering plants, Arabidopsis thaliana is by far the most studied one, being the most researched organism referred on thousands of publications (Hoffmann, 2002, Koornneef and Meinke, 2010). Several reasons favour this small annual weed A. thaliana for model organism that has five chromosomes (2n=10). Features like a short life cycle, small size flowering plant needing limited space to grow and producing a large number of seeds with self-pollination. They tolerate a wider amplitude of climates than other well-investigated species of the Brassicaceae, and range from 68◦N (North Scandinavia) to 0◦ (mountains of Tanzania and Kenya) latitudes (Koornneef et al., 2004), makes A. thaliana suitable for analysing variation in adaptive traits. It is native to Eurasia belonging to the mustard family, Brassicaceae. A. thaliana was the first plant to have its FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 16 genome sequenced (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000). As the study of plants evolved, it was divided into several different branches like morphology, physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology in the 1970s and a single organism was needed so that scientist worldwide could coordinate their study together (Koornneef and Meinke, 2010). Contrary to other well studied plants, A. thaliana is not colonized well by mycorrhizal fungi but it might not be the case with other microorganisms in the rhizosphere niche like bacteria (Lundberg et al., 2012)
Solanum lycopersicum
Originating from South America, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) which includes the common cultivated tomato and some wild relatives, was brought to Europe in the sixteenth century and introduced in North America in the eighteenth century. It belongs to the Solanaceae family that is now widely consumed around the world (Hanssen and Lapidot, 2012). It is an herbaceous diploid dicotyledon with twelve chromosomes (2n=24) with a short cycle cultivated annually for its fruits (González et al., 2011). Together with the potato (Solanum tuberosum) they are two of the most consumed vegetables, being the most common of the Solanaceae family (Stewart and Shepherd, 2013). S. lycopersicum shows a rather wide climatic tolerance, being able to grow in high temperatures and with high humidity levels. Mediterranean conditions favour its cultivation and because of that it grows well in open field. To prevent yield loss because of pathogens, especially viral diseases like Pepino mosaic virus, Tomato infectious chlorosis virus, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus and some others, the production is basically done in greenhouses. It is easy to simulate the right conditions for its cultivation in greenhouses and with modern varieties bred to tolerate and resist various temperatures, salinities, water levels, soil compositions and diseases/pests it became even more simple.(Bai and Lindhout, 2007). Tomato is also important as a vegetable for its nutritional value, being a rich source of minerals, vitamins (vitamin C), fibre, folic acid, lycopene (carotenoid responsible for the red colour of the tomato and synthesized during the ripening of the fruit), quercetin, kaempferol, α-tocopherol, apigenin, luteolin, neoxanthin, lutein, αcryptoxanthin, α-carotene, β-carotene, cyclolycopene, and β-carotene 5, 6-epoxide and many other active compounds (Løvdal et al., 2010). Known for its health benefits including antioxidant effects (Aldrich et al., 2010), preventing cardiovascular, hepatic and digestive health problems as well as helping in the prevention of some cancer types by FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 17 its ability to inhibit adenosine deaminase which is important for tumour regression (Friedman et al., 2009, Alam et al., 2018).
Importance of Phosphorous
Phosphorus is a macronutrient usually present in the form of phosphate in the soil that has in organisms an important role in the energy storage as sugar-phosphate which are photosynthesis and respiration intermediators (Khan, 2009). Plant membranes contain phosphorus in their phospholipids being thus, important for structural integrity (Khan, 2009). The energy fuel of cells, “ATP” (adenosine triphosphate), also contains phosphorus and this is also present in RNA and DNA. Phosphate ions (H2PO-2) may bind to soil particles containing aluminium or iron, this happens because of the group hydroxyl (OH-) that exchanges with phosphate. As a result, phosphate can be tightly bound, and its lack of mobility and availability can limit the plant growth (Rodríguez et al., 2006). Bacteria become more prevalent in alkaline soils, but plant roots growth is favoured in acidic soils (pH 5.5; 6.5). The acidity of the soil promotes the weathering of rocks that release K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and increases the solubility of phosphates (Holford, 1997). More solubility increases and facilitates absorption through the root hair system which is through the symport H+ <-> HPO42- (Holford, 1997).
Formation of Biofilm and Exopolysaccharide production
In order to survive and rapidly adapt to any changing condition in the enviroment, bacteria need to have a variety of gene expression, as each condition requires different responses. One interesting and relevant example of bacterial adaptation is the ability to shroud itself and its peers in a community with what is referred to as biofilm. The biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides (EPS) has been extensively studied and the amount of EPS produced and their composition is the focus of many studies (Levander et al., 2001). The biofilm allows the microbial community to be protected with the possibility to flow within the matrix formed with exopolysaccharide (Jefferson, 2004). Trehalose for example is a disaccharide found in bacteria and fungi that, when in high levels, can help protecting and mitigating abiotic stress, like drought. By forming a gel, it prevents cells from dehydrate when high temperatures are stressing plants (Glick, 2012). Virulence is essential for pathogens to increase their prosperity, and the synthesis of EPS is usually intertwined (Killiny et al., 2013). The fact that this EPS matrix that forms the biofilm acts as a shroud and protects bacterial communities means that it can act as well as a FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 18 bioactive dome that might protect plants from pathogens if they establish a partnership with the bacterium producing EPS. EPS structure and function can differ depending on its producer; one bacterium can have the capacity to produce different EPS depending on the surrounding conditions, as demonstrated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus thermophilus (Bogino et al., 2013)
Objectives
The main objective of this dissertation was to screen previously isolated bacteria from different environments regarding their characteristic as promoters of plant growth. This was achieved by (i) growing the bacteria in specific medium to assess their capacity to solubilize phosphate; (ii) to assess their capacity to produce biofilm through the crystal violet assay; (iii) detecting if they can synthesize indol-3-acetic acid (IAA) which is the most common natural occurring auxin. Furthermore, promoting plant growth characteristics of selected bacteria will be also assessed by co-cultures with Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum.
Materials and methods
Biological material and growth conditions
Based on the biotechnological potential of a large list of bacteria from LEMUP’s culture collection and gene characteristics search in the literature, 38 bacteria were preselected for this study (Table 1). To perform the experiments, plants Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia Col-0 and Solanum lycopersicum type Cerise of Vita brand were used.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 19
Table 1 List of all the bacteria used in this study. Strain Phylum Affiliation Origin Medium Berg2-170 Actinobacteria Dietzia maris IW BG11-2 Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-176 Actinobacteria Dietzia sp. LC375 Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-177 Actinobacteria Dietzia maris X79291 Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-178 Actinobacteria Dietzia sp. LC431 Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-180 Actinobacteria Dietzia maris (T) X79290 Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-181 Actinobacteria Dietzia sp. Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-182 Actinobacteria Dietzia sp. H0 FJ435351 Erylus deficiens MA Berg2-183 Actinobacteria Dietzia sp. H0 FJ435349 Erylus deficiens MA A(2)_39Z Actinobacteria Dietzia maris Grape vine MA A(2)_45Z Actinobacteria Dietzia maris strain Y1 Grape vine MA A(2)_27 Actinobacteria Agrococcus sp. MDT2-5 Grape vine NA A(2)_9X Actinobacteria Leucobacter sp. HDUM179329 Grape vine NA A(2)_30Z Actinobacteria Microbacterium aoyamense strain KV-492 Grape vine NA SAP103 Actinobacteria Brevibacterium sp. DAO1 Sargassum muticum MA A(2)_12U Bacteriodetes Wautersiella falsenii genomovar 1 strain NF 289 Grape vine NA PAP 9 Bacteriodetes Zobellia russeli SS16 Phorphyra dioica MA A(1)_14 Firmicutes Bacillus megatarium strain 90 Grape vine NA A(2)_12 Firmicutes Bacillus velezensis strain D-004 Grape vine NA A(2)_30 Firmicutes Paenibacillus polymyxa strain RCP6 Grape vine NA A(2)_3X Firmicutes Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain ZSY – 1 Grape vine NA A(2)_5X Firmicutes Bacillus tequilensis strain PFi_1.2 Grape vine NA A(2)_8X Firmicutes Paenibacillus graminis strain: NBRC 105756 Grape vine NA UAP 111 Firmicutes Salinicoccus sp. L21-PYE-C40 Ulva sp. MA LF2 Planctomycetes Rhodopirellula rubra Laminaria sp. M607 Mastercarpus stelatus MsF5 Planctomycetes Rhodopirellula rubra M607
PAP 61 Planctomycetes Rhodopirellula baltica M4 (HQ845491.1) Phorphyra dioica M607 UAP 128 Planctomycetes Rhodopirellula baltica G7 (HQ845470.1) Sargassum muticum M607 A(1)_8 Proteobacteria Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strain TF1-9 Grape vine NA A(2)_38Z Proteobacteria Methylobacterium tardum strain IHBB 11162 Grape vine NA Pseudoalteromonas carrageenovora NBRC UAP 5 Proteobacteria Ulva sp. MA 12985 UAP 6 Proteobacteria Halomonas anticariensis 2013092004 Ulva sp. MA UAP 8 Proteobacteria Alteromonas australica HMF2613 Ulva sp. MA UAP 11 Proteobacteria Vibrio hepatarius LMG 20362 Ulva sp. MA Pseudoalteromonas camageenovora NBRC UAP 18 Proteobacteria Ulva sp. MA 12985 UAP 30 Proteobacteria Marinomonas dokdonensis DSW10-19 Ulva sp. MA UAP 84 Proteobacteria Pseudoalteromonas sp. ZJ6102 Ulva sp. MA SAP 9 Proteobacteria Halomonas anticariensis 2013092004 Sargassum muticum MA SAP28 Proteobacteria Marinomonas dokdonensis DSW10-19 Sargassum muticum MA FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 20
The bacteria were grown in nutrient agar or broth (NA/NB), marine agar or broth (MA/MB) and M607 (agar or broth) media according to Table 1. The composition of medium NA was 0.5 % peptone and 0.3 % yeast extract (with 1.6 % agar when solid). MA medium was constituted by 0.5 % peptone, 0.1 % yeast extract and marine water (with 1.6 % agar when solid). The composition of M607 was 0.025 % peptone, 0.0025 % yeast extract, 50mL/L 0.1MTrisHCL, 10mL/L of a solution of vitamins, 20mL/L of Hutners basal salts and 10mL/L of glucose, as described by Lage and Bondoso, (2011). The medium used for the growth of the plants was Murashige and Skoog (Skoog, 1962).
Bacteria PGP experiments
Phosphate solubilization
For the study of phosphate solubilization, the bacteria were grown initially in their respective media up to late exponential growth phase. Several 10 µl droplets of each bacterial culture were placed on Pikovskaya agar medium (PVK) prepared according to Anand et al. (2016) and on NBRIP medium (Nautiyal, 2006). For 5 days the cultures were incubated at 25ºC and the presence of transparent halos around the bacteria was registered. IAA production by bacteria
For the detection of IAA, the bacteria were grown in their respective culture medium supplemented with 0.1 % L-tryptophan (main indole precursor), at 220 rpm. The Planctomycetes were incubated for 5 days and the rest of the bacteria for 2 days at 25 ºC. The levels of IAA produced by the different bacteria were assessed by the colorimetric assay using the Salkowski reagent method (Rahman et al., 2010). In brief, for the reaction, 1 ml of each culture in triplicate was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 minutes and the cell pellet separated from the supernatant. With a ratio of 1:2 for supernatant and Salkowski reagent the reaction took place in total darkness for 30 minutes. In a spectrophotometer, the OD was measured at 530nm. To express IAA concentration as a function of cell density, the optical density at 600 nm of the cultures was measure. Three standard curves were made for each growth medium (MB, NB and M607). Concentrations of IAA with values of 0, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 µg/ml were prepared. IAA was solubilized in acetone. The vials were covered with aluminium foils because of the photosensitivity of IAA. The differences in colour across the gradient of concentrations FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 21
was evident in just a few minutes (Fig.1). The absorbance was measured, and reference curve created. The equations were obtained through Microsoft Excel (Fig.2).
a b c
Figure 1 Reaction intensity according to the concentration of IAA for the standard curves. (a) Salkowski reaction in NB medium; (b) Salkowski reaction in MB medium; (c) Salkowski reaction in M607 medium. The gradient of concentrations was done in triplets, (A - 0 µg/ml; B - 5 µg/ml; C - 10 µg/ml; D - 20 µg/ml; E - 50 µg/ml; F – 100 µg/ml). FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 22
A
B
C
Figure 2 Standard curves of the Salkowski reactions for the detection of IAA (A) NB medium, (B) MB medium and (C) M607 medium.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 23
Biofilm formation by bacteria
The bacteria were cultivated in the respective media for five days at 220 rpm and 25 ºC. From each bacterium three dilutions (10-2, 10-4 ,10-6) were tested for the formation of biofilm, 2 µl of culture were added to 198 µl of the respective medium and were place in 96 well plates. After 2 days at 25 ºC each culture was removed, and new medium was added to the wells. The cultures in the wells where grown for 5 days to attain stationary phase. Each culture was controlled regarding possible contamination. The liquid part of the cultures in the wells were removed and subsequently each well was washed with phosphate saline buffer (PBS) 1x to remove bacteria not attached. Biofilms were fixed with 200 µl of 100% methanol for 15 minutes. After drying, the biofilm was stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 minutes. The excess of stain was removed, and the wells washed with deionized water. The biofilm was resuspended in 96% ethanol and measured in a microplate reader at wavelengths ranging from 500 to 600 nm. Three one-way ANOVA analyses with a multiple comparison Dunnett test were done comparing the cultures results to the respective control which was only culture medium without bacterium. Co-cultures of Plant and Bacteria
After the selection of the promising bacteria that showed better results in the previous performed assays and seemed to have a higher probability to possess PGP attributes, Vibrio UAP 11, Halomonas UAP 6, Marinomonas SAP28, Bacillus A(2)_12 and the four Planctomycetes of the genus Rhodopirellula, a co-culture system was developed and adapted (Fig.3). Bacillus A(1)_14 was used as a neutral control since it did not show any significant PGPB attribute. In a glass flask, 40ml of Murashige & Skoog (MS) medium with 0.5% agar was placed. After, 15 ml of bacterial medium (MA for marine bacteria, NA for fresh water bacteria and M607 for planctomycetes) with 1.6% agar were added on top of the previous MS medium. 800 µl of bacterial inoculum were inoculated in a way that covered the surface of the 15ml layer of bacteria medium. Bacteria were grown for 5 to 7 days in order to occupy the surface of their respective medium. After, another thin layer of 10ml of MS medium with 0.5% agar was added on top of the bacteria (note that the medium needed to be around 45ºC when added, or it would kill the bacterial cells). When the three layers of media were in place, previous sterilized seeds of A. thaliana were placed on the top MS layer. The flask, as showed in Figure 3A, was covered with parafilm membrane to allow air exchange but to avoid contamination. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 24
Figure 3 Scheme of the co-culture apparatus. A is the cup/flask with A. thaliana. B is the glass test tube with the co-culture of S. lycopersicum. In both schemes, 1 is the plant seed; 2 is the thin layer of MS; 3 is the bacteria medium; 4 is the thick layer of MS.
The seeds of A. thaliana Col-0 were kindly provided by professor Silvia Coimbra. They were surface sterilized with 70 % ethanol for 5 min, then transferred to 10 % NaClO + 0.25 % tween-20 and incubated for 10 min followed by several washes with deionized water. Tween 20 was used instead of the commonly used SDS because besides being a mild non-ionic surfactant and highly hydrophilic, with emulsifying effect, it acts as a wetting agent being non-toxic and inert as well. Seeds were then incubated at 4 ºC for 3 days for the vernalization process and to have a uniform germination (protocol adapted from (Zhang et al., 2006)). For S. lycopersicum the same method was used, but it was performed in glass test tubes (Fig. 3 B), with the same arrangement of the media layers (5 ml of MS with 0.5 % agar, 1 ml of bacterium medium with 1.6 % agar and 0.5 ml of MS with 0.5 % agar). S. lycopersicum seeds were surface sterilized in 70 % ethanol for 5 min, followed by 5 % commercial bleach with 0.1 % tween 20 for 10 minutes and washed 6-7 times with deionized water ((1*) based on protocols from Harry Klee's Lab, Mike Hasegawa and Ray Bressan Labs2). Both plants were incubated in a growth chamber at about 21 ºC, in a 16 h light/ 8 h darkness photoperiod and with a light intensity of about 22 µmol.m-2. s-1. After 3.5 weeks, the plant development was observed. Root size, shoot size and fresh/dry weight were measured.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 25
Results and Discussion
In the phosphate solubilization assay the appearance of transparent halos around the bacteria were due to the utilization, by the bacteria of compounds that contained phosphate such as Ca3(PO4)2 which give the medium a milky white aspect. Twenty one percent of the bacteria in NBRIP medium and 10.5 % in Pikovskaya medium were able to solubilize phosphate (Table 2). The strain UAP 5 of the genus Pseudoalteromonas, strain UAP6 of the genus Halomonas and strain A(2)_12 of the genus Bacillus were the ones capable of higher phosphate solubilization (Fig. 4). Furthermore, bacteria belonging to the genera Bacillus, Paenibacillus and Rhodopirellula were also able to solubilize phosphate in a lower degree.
Table 2 Positive results of the phosphate solubilization assay and comparison between Pikovskaya (PVK) and NBRIP medium. Phylum Genus Strain PVK NBRIP Firmicute Bacillus A (2) _12 + ++ Firmicute Paenibacillus A (2) _30 - + Firmicute Pseudoalteromonas UAP 5 + ++ Proteobacteria Halomonas UAP 6 - ++ Proteobacteria Vibrio UAP 11 + + Proteobacteria Halomonas SAP 9 - + Planctomycetes Rhodopirellula PAP 61 - + - No halo formation; + small sized halo; ++ Big sized halo.
Figure 4 Cultures on NBRIP medium where the phosphate solubilization halos are visible around the bacteria. A - UAP5; B - PAP61; C - A (2)_12; D - UAP6.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 26
As observed in our results, NBRIP medium was more accurate giving better results than Pikovskaya medium because this one is less sensitive to phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (Nautiyal, 2006). The NBRIP medium was, thus, more accurate. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria work with inorganic phosphates such as
Ca3(PO4)2 and FePO4 through siderophores and hydroxyl ions (Rodríguez et al., 2006). Enterobacter, Pantoea and Klebsiella managed to solubilize better phosphate in the form of Ca3(PO4)2 than FePO4 (Chung et al., 2005) Bacteria belonging to the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Enterobacter, are reported to solubilize insoluble phosphate compounds and aid in plant growth (Rodriguez and Fraga, 1999) Desale et al. (2013) reported that halophytes such as Halomonas and Halobacillus had growth promoting abilities in the presence of salinity stress. Three strains of the referred genera could solubilize phosphate and produce IAA. A mixture of these bacteria enhanced the grow of Sesuvium portulacastrum. Also, from a hyper salinity environment in India, the Sambhar lake Sediminibacillus halophilus strain SL35 showed a high capacity to solubilize phosphate (Sahay et al., 2012). Suarez et al. (2014) isolated a phosphate mobilizing bacteria from the soil rhizosphere of a natural meadow plant (Plantago winteri) which was most closely related with Rhizobium rhizoryzae with a 93.5 % of 16S rRNA gene similarity giving rise to a new genus, Hartmannibacter. Gupta et al. (2014) isolated from the rhizosphere of Theobroma cacao and Cocos nucifera (cocoa and coconut trees) Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae that possessed genes essential for the mineral phosphate solubilization and IAA production. Chen et al. (2006) reported for the first time that Arthrobacter ureafaciens, Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum, Rhodococcus erythropolis and Delftia sp. were capable of phosphate solubilization when they confirmed that considerable amounts of tricalcium phosphate were solubilized in the medium by secreting organic acids. Oteino et al. (2015) reported a good phosphate solubilization of five strains of Pseudomonas sp. but not in one strain of Bacillus. In the Turkish tea rhizosphere, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Paenibacillus and Stenotrophomonas genera were the most prominent phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Çakmakçı et al., 2010). Bacterial genera like Azotobacter, Bacillus, Beijerinckia, Burkholderia, Enterobacter, Erwinia, Flavobacterium, Microbacterium, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and Serratia are reported as the most significant phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Bhattacharyya and Jha, 2012).
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 27
The production of IAA was analysed regarding the content in µg/ml of culture, and µg/ml/Abs (Fig. 5). In general, when tryptophan was added as supplement to the cultures, all the bacteria tested had the capacity to produce IAA. However very low levels or absence of production were observed in strains Alteromonas UAP8, Pseudoalteromonas UAP18, Pseudoalteromonas UAP84, Salinicoccus UAP111, Dietzia A(2)_39Z, Acinetobacter A(1)_8, Paenibacillus A(2)_30, Bacillus A(2)_3X and Methylobacterium A(2)_38Z. The higher levels of IAA produced were by strain UAP 11 of the genus Vibrio, strain SAP 28 of the genus Marinomonas, strain A(2)_45Z of the genus Dietzia and the 4 Planctomycetes LF2, MsF5, PAP 61 and UAP 128. No relation regarding phylogeny and production of IAA was observed. Consistent production of IAA was obtained with the 4 Planctomycetes from the genus Rhodopirellula (Fig 5). Regarding the genus Dietzia, both high production and absence of IAA production was unexpectedly obtained (A(2)_45Z and A(2)_39Z respectively). Other species showed production of intermediate levels of IAA. As IAA was only produced when tryptophan was supplemented to the media, we can infer that these bacteria, although having the metabolic pathway to produce IAA, their internal levels of tryptophan must have not been high enough to allow the complete production of IAA.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 28
Figure 5 Levels of IAA production by all bacteria under study. Comparing between the concentration of IAA µg/ml (A) as a function of the cultures optical density at 600 nm (B). Red rectangles that connect strains UAP11, SAP28, A(2)_45Z and the four Planctomycetes evidence the strains with higher production levels. The black variance bars symbolize the error between the mean of the replicates.
Several bacteria can produce indole compounds and the auxin phytohormone Indole-3-acetic acid or IAA is one of them (Spaepen et al., 2007). This compound is of extreme relevance for the interaction between plant and bacteria because of promoting effect it has. The mechanism to produce IAA depends on the presence of the right tools or precursors for the bacterium to synthesise the IAA. Root exudates such as L-tryptophan are the main precursors for IAA in bacteria. The pathways to produce IAA in bacteria is very similar to the pathway present in plants (Spaepen et al., 2007). Leveau and Lindow (2005) observed that a strain of Pseudomonas putida 1290 was able to catabolize and FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 29 use IAA as a source of carbon, nitrogen and energy and when the growth medium was supplemented with L-tryptophan P. putida 1290 was capable of producing IAA. Jensen et al. (1995) also observed this capacity with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Microorganisms capable of catabolizing IAA might also affect positively the growth of plants by preventing the high negative effect of high concentrations of auxins for plants since high concentrations of auxins influence plant development states as shown by Biasi (2012) where some concentrations of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), which is an auxin as well, became toxic to Lavandula angustifolia. IAA also acts as a signalling molecule for several microorganisms playing a very important role in rhizobacteria-plant interactions. Starting with tryptophan, at least five different pathways have been described for the biosynthesis of IAA being most of them similar to the pathways in plants (Spaepen and Vanderleyden, 2011). The endophytic bacterial strain Enterobacter radicincitans DSM 16656 has been shown to improve plant growth in A. thaliana possessing several attributes as being able to fix atmospheric nitrogen, produce phytohormones, and solubilize phosphate compounds (Brock et al., 2013) The results of the biofilm formation are presented in Figure 6. In this figure the three boxes in red evidence the strains that were grown in the three different media. In general, all bacteria produced biofilm being the most evident strains the ones grown in MB media. For comparative purpose, the lowest wavelength (500nm) and cell concentration (10-6) were used because the other absorbances and cell concentrations reached very high values going beyond the detection limits of the instruments. The results evidence that marine broth medium (MB) favours the production of biofilm but no relation could be attributed amongst the different phyla.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 30
Figure 6 Levels of biofilm formation by the different bacterial cultures with a concentration of 10-6 stained with crystal violet at 500nm. Asterisks marks the strains that were significantly relevant. Each asterisk means a more precise significative result; 1 asterisk α<0.05; two asterisk α<0.01; three asterisk α<0.001 and four asterisks α<0.0001 comparative to the control.
Bais et al. (2004) showed the ability of Bacillus subtilis to inhibit Pseudomonas syringae which is a pathogen of tomato, to be facilitated by the formation of biofilm in the root surface of Arabidopsis thaliana. Jayasinghearachchi and Seneviratne (2004) observed that biofilm formations of Bradyrhizobium elkanii and Penicillium sp. increased significantly the nodulation and accumulation of nitrogen in soybeans. Kasim et al. (2016) tested several PGPBs capable of forming biofilm and observed that with increased concentrations of NaCl, the quantity of biofilm increased, and that the highest quantity of biofilm produced helped barley (Hordeum vulgare) by alleviating some of the effects of the high salinity. This increasement in biofilm with higher concentrations of NaCl is in line with our results in the biofilm assay, as the bacteria in the saline MB medium produced higher values of biofilm. Kasim et al. (2016) speculated that bacteria can adopt strategies to survive in the plant rhizosphere to survive stress conditions such as high salinity.
The seed germination rate of both plants, A. thaliana and S. lycopersicum was very low (for instance, about 30 % for S. lycopersicum) and uneven, which are critical points for the analysis of the results. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 31
The co-culture plant-bacterium experiments were done using the respective media of the bacteria. So, the controls will allow an evaluation of the effect of these media in both plants growth (Table.3). Regarding A. thaliana, the control plants growing in the presence of M607 were comparatively the ones that produced more leaves, longer shoots, higher dry and fresh weight and flowers including some fruits (Fig.7). In the presence of the two other media, plants had less leaves, smaller shoots and lower dry/fresh weight. No flowers and necrosis were observed in the presence of MA medium but although in the presence of NA medium some plants produced flowers (50 %), the majority presented chlorosis. When A. thaliana was co-cultivated with the Planctomycetes, the only bacteria where Arabidopsis development was observed, some differences were detected (table.3). R. rubra strain LF2 induced a slight decrease in the number of leaves, a considerable decrease in the size of the shoot and a certain range of fresh/dry weight. Several plants produced flowers (57 %) and one produced fruit. No chlorosis was observed. The only plant germinated in the presence of R. baltica PAP 61 showed a similar development comparable to the control (table.3) but had less fresh/dry weight. In the presence of the R. baltica strain MsF5, A. thaliana had a more reduced development in terms of leaves produced, shoot size and fresh/dry weight. No flowers were produced, and a general plant chlorosis was detected. Once again as with A. thaliana, S. lycopersicum growth obtained in medium M607 (Fig.8) was much better (higher number of leaves, shoot size, fresh and dry weight) than in the presence of MA medium (table 3). When in the presence of the Planctomycetes, strain UAP128 of R. baltica induced a comparable plant development to the control. R. baltica strain LF2 induced a slight decrease in the number of leaves but a higher fresh and dry weights. R. rubra strain MsF5 was again the strain that induced the lowest plant development within the Planctomycetes. Bacillus strains A(2)_12, A(1)_14, Halomonas strain UAP6 and Dietzia strainBerg02-182, the only non-planctomycetes bacteria that germinated, showed a strong decrease in their developments suggestive of death but comparable to the ones of plants in MB control (Fig.8).
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 32
Table 3 Data collected from the co-culture assay of the selected bacterial strains with Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum and the respective controls without bacteria (Ctrl).
Medium Treatment Leaves Shoot(cm) Fresh Dry Flowers weight weight Other observations (mg) (mg)
M607 Ctrl 17.5 7 357.45 16.85 100% Fruits
LF2 13.5 4.75 158 7.7 75 % Fruits
MSF5 9.2 1 49.3 3.7 0 % Chlorosis
PAP61 15 7 162.3 10.3 100 % 5 Fruits
MA Ctrl 9.3 0.5 97.2 3 0 % -
NA Ctrl 12.4 2.9 86.8 2.1 50 % Chlorosis
Ctrl 16 8.3 258.6 9.5 - Chlorosis
UAP128 15 8 328.7 13.1 - - M607 LF2 13 7 352.2 12.6 - -
MSF5 5 7 72.3 6.2 - Death
A(1)_14 2 2 7.8 0.6 - Death NA A(2)_12 2 2.5 20.85 1.3 - Death
MA Ctrl 4 2 38.2 2.5 - Death
UAP6 2 1.25 10 0.7 - Death
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 33
Figure 7 Arabidopsis thaliana cultures. (A) Control in medium NA, (B) Control in MA, (C) Control in M607 medium. (D) Co-culture with R. baltica strain PAP61 and (F) Co-culture with R. rubra strain LF2.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 34
Figure 8 Co-culture in glass test tubes of Solanum lycopersicum with some selected bacteria. (A) Control in M607 medium; (B) Control in MA medium. (C) Co-cultures with R. rubra strain LF2; (D) Co-culture with R. baltica strain UAP128; (E) Co-culture with Bacillus strain A(2)_12 and (F) Co-culture with Halomonas strain UAP6.
PGPB can increase the potential of crop production by creating sustainable agriculture systems that improve plant growth but also avoids agriculture pollution (Sturz et al., 2000). The use of PGPB as biofertilizers has already been suggested (Adesemoye et al., 2009, Lugtenberg and Kamilova, 2009) and the fact that some secondary metabolites like alkaloids, compounds homologous of phytohormones and antibiotics are synthesised by bacteria, makes these PGPB candidates. Kang et al. (2014) had a significant increase in biomass and hypocotyl size in Cucumis sativus (cucumber), S. lycopersicum and Raphanus raphanistrum subsp.sativus (radish) with the application the bacterium Leifsonia soli strain SE134. This improvement in plant development was attributed to the phytohormone gibberellin which was detected. The application of Leifsonia soli to the rice mutant Waito-C which is a GAdeficient cultivar, its increase in development further evidenced Kang et al. (2014) results. Almoneafy et al. (2014) tested four different strains of a rhizobacterial strain of Bacillus. Four were all four produced IAA and formed biofilm, but only three were capable FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 35 of solubilize phosphate. A positive correlation between the IAA production and the fresh/dry weight of the plant was shown. A similar relationship between IAA production and fresh/dry weight was obtained in our S. lycopersicum co-cultures with Planctomycetes. Jha and Saraf (2012) with four isolates, Brevibacillus, Bacillus, Micrococcus and Acinetobacter saw that they had the ability to produce IAA and solubilize phosphate. They enhanced the growth of Jatropha curcas (barbados nut) but the higher improvement occurred when a culture mix of the three strains that were capable of solubilize phosphate was applied to J. curcas. In contrast, in the study of Probanza et al. (2002) it was verified that two strains of Bacillus promoted the growth of Pinus pinea (stone pine) but not in mixed culture probably due to competition. Goswami et al. (2013) showed that a Pseudomonas sp. isolated from marine water had multiple PGPB characteristics such as production of IAA, phosphate solubilization. The efficacy of it as a promoter of plant development was tested in the plants Cicer arietinum (chich pea) and Vigna radiata (green gram). Both plants showed increase in fresh biomass. Bacillus, Paenibacillus and Comamonas revealed capacity to produce IAA promoted the root growth of stem cuttings of Actinidia deliciosa (Kiwi) (Erturk et al., 2010). Rojas-Tapias et al. (2012) improved plant growth of Zea mays (maize) when it was under saline stress with two strains of Azotobacter which is a diazotroph. These showed the ability to solubilize phosphate and produce auxins (only in the presence of salinity). Bacteria that show good PGP attributes under high saline levels go accordingly with our results, the Planctomycetes that grew in M607 medium and the strains that grew in marine agar medium. The fact that MA and NA showed a general negative effect in both A. thaliana and S. lycopersicum in contract to M607, suggests that the different concentration of organic compounds present in MA and NA influenced negatively the development of the plants. Organic compounds such as peptone and yeast extract contain Cyclo(prolyltyrosyl), Cyclo([iso]leucylprolyl), Cyclo(phenylalanylprolyl) and Cyclo(prolylvalyl). Cyclo(prolyltyrosyl) can have antibacterial and cytoxic effects (Bycroft et al., 1988). Particularly Cyclo(phenylalanyl prolyl) that showed phytotoxic activity in some of its configurations (Blunt and Munro, 2008).
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 36
Conclusion The search for PGPBs has been an interesting study subject for quite some time. Several were the studies where the search was a success. Having this said, marine environments, namely the sea, have so many possibilities in terms of its microscopic inhabitants that the possibility to find new and better bacteria that could help improve plant development is very appealing. In this study it was showed that both marine and non-saline bacteria could produce IAA, solubilize phosphate and produce biofilm. The marine bacteria tested had better characteristics to behave as PGP bacteria than the ones from non-saline environments due to their higher values in the assays performed. The bacterial culture media NA and MA which are richer in organic compounds, showed negative effects in both plants control. Plants in co-culture with the Planctomycetes were the only ones that gave results in these assays, probably because of their growing medium M607 which has fewer levels of organic compounds. With the exception of R. rubra strain MsF5 Planctomycetes did not impacted negatively in A. thaliana and S. lycopersicum growth and the biomass of S. lycopersicum even increased comparably to the control plants. Future perspectives for this study would involve the development of a bacterial culture medium that meet the needed requirements in organic compounds for bacterial growth but that did not negatively inhibit plant germination and development. Since Planctomycetes were the bacteria that gave better results on the PGPB assays, further tests could be performed in order to better assess their capacity to improve plant growth and development.
FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 37
References (1*) http://www.hos.ufl.edu/meteng/HansonWebpagecontents/Tomatotransformatioproto col.html
ADESEMOYE, A. O., OBINI, M. & UGOJI, E. O. 2008. Comparison of plant growthpromotion with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis in three vegetables. Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 39, 423-426. ADESEMOYE, A. O., TORBERT, H. A. & KLOEPPER, J. W. 2009. Plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol, 58, 921-9. AHMED, S. & GRAINGE, M. 1986. Potential of the neem tree (Azadirachta indica) for pest control and rural development. Economic Botany, 40, 201-209. ALAM, P., RAKA, M. A., KHAN, S., SARKER, J., AHMED, N., NATH, P. D., HASAN, N., MOHIB, M. M., TISHA, A. & TAHER SAGOR, M. A. 2018. A clinical review of the effectiveness of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against cardiovascular dysfunction and related metabolic syndrome. Journal of Herbal Medicine. ALDRICH, H. T., SALANDANAN, K., KENDALL, P., BUNNING, M., STONAKER, F., KÜLEN, O. & STUSHNOFF, C. 2010. Cultivar choice provides options for local production of organic and conventionally produced tomatoes with higher quality and antioxidant content. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90, 2548- 2555. ALMONEAFY, A. A., KAKAR, K. U., NAWAZ, Z., LI, B., SAAND, M. A., CHUN-LAN, Y. & XIE, G.-L. 2014. Tomato plant growth promotion and antibacterial relatedmechanisms of four rhizobacterial Bacillus strains against Ralstonia solanacearum. Symbiosis, 63, 59-70. ANAND, K., KUMARI, B. & MALLICK, M. A. 2016. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: An effective and alternative approach as biofertilizers. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 8, 37-40. ANDERSON, T. A., GUTHRIE, E. A. & WALTON, B. T. 1993. Bioremediation in the rhizosphere. Environmental Science & Technology, 27, 2630-2636. ARMSTRONG, G. A. 1997. Genetics of eubacterial carotenoid biosynthesis: a colorful tale. Annu Rev Microbiol, 51, 629-59. ARTYOMOV, V. M., ARTYOMOV, E. M. & FRIDMAN, S. D. 1994. Ammonia uptake by plants. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 29, 221-228. BACCI, L., BARONTI, S., PREDIERI, S. & DI VIRGILIO, N. 2009. Fiber yield and quality of fiber nettle (Urtica dioica L.) cultivated in Italy. Industrial Crops and Products, 29, 480-484. BADRI, D. V. & VIVANCO, J. M. 2009. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ, 32, 666-81. BAI, Y. & LINDHOUT, P. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Annals of botany, 100, 1085-1094. BAIS, H. P., FALL, R. & VIVANCO, J. M. 2004. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol, 134, 307-19. BAIS, H. P., WEIR, T. L., PERRY, L. G., GILROY, S. & VIVANCO, J. M. 2006. THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57, 233266. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 38
BALTZ, R. H. 2008. Renaissance in antibacterial discovery from actinomycetes. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 8, 557-563. BENNELL, M. R. & VERBYLA, A. P. 2008. Quantifying the response of crops to shelter in the agricultural regions of South Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 59, 950-957. BERENDSEN, R. L., PIETERSE, C. M. J. & BAKKER, P. A. H. M. 2012. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science, 17, 478-486. BHARTI, N., YADAV, D., BARNAWAL, D., MAJI, D. & KALRA, A. 2013. Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans, a halotolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, improves yield and content of secondary metabolites in Bacopa monnieri (L.) Pennell under primary and secondary salt stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 29, 379-387. BHATTACHARYYA, P. N. & JHA, D. K. 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 28, 1327-50. BIASI, C. M. D. B. M. A. M. M. C. D. L. A. 2012. Rooting induction of different Lavandula angustifolia accessions by auxin application. Ciências Agrárias, 33, 175-182. BIRD, P. R., BICKNELL, D., BULMAN, P. A., BURKE, S. J. A., LEYS, J. F., PARKER, J. N., VAN DER SOMMEN, F. J. & VOLLER, P. 1993. The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. In: PRINSLEY, R. T. (ed.) The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture: Review papers presented at the Australian Conference, The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture, Albury, Victoria, Australia, October 1991. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. BISHNOI, U., POLSON, S. W., SHERRIER, D. J. & BAIS, H. P. 2015. Draft Genome Sequence of a Natural Root Isolate, Bacillus subtilis UD1022, a Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Biocontrol Agent. Genome announcements, 3, e00696-15. BLUNT, J., & MUNRO, MURRAY 2008. Dictionary of marine natural products, with CDROM. BONNARDEAUX, Y., BRUNDRETT, M., BATTY, A., DIXON, K., KOCH, J. & SIVASITHAMPARAM, K. 2007. Diversity of mycorrhizal fungi of terrestrial orchids: compatibility webs, brief encounters, lasting relationships and alien invasions. Mycological Research, 111, 51-61. BORCHARDT, J. K. 2002. The Beginnings of Drug Therapy: Ancient Mesopotamian Medicine. Drug News Perspect, 3, 187. BROCK, A. K., BERGER, B., MEWIS, I. & RUPPEL, S. 2013. Impact of the PGPB Enterobacter radicincitans DSM 16656 on Growth, Glucosinolate Profile, and Immune Responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Microbial Ecology, 65, 661-670. BROOK, I. 2012. 337 - Actinomycosis. In: GOLDMAN, L. & SCHAFER, A. I. (eds.) Goldman's Cecil Medicine (Twenty Fourth Edition). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. BRUNDRETT, M. 1991. Mycorrhizas in Natural Ecosystems. In: BEGON, M., FITTER, A. H. & MACFADYEN, A. (eds.) Advances in Ecological Research. Academic Press. BUCHANAN, R. E. 1918. Studies in the Nomenclature and Classification of the Bacteria: V. Subgroups and Genera of the Bacteriaceae. Journal of bacteriology, 3, 27-61. BYCROFT, B. W., HIGTON, A. A., & ROBERTS, A. D 1988. Dictionary of antibiotics and related substances. ÇAKMAKÇı, R., DÖNMEZ, M. F., ERTÜRK, Y., ERAT, M., HAZNEDAR, A. & SEKBAN, R. 2010. Diversity and metabolic potential of culturable bacteria from the rhizosphere of Turkish tea grown in acidic soils. Plant and Soil, 332, 299-318. CAMACHO, A. 2009. Sulfur Bacteria. In: LIKENS, G. E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Oxford: Academic Press. CARDINALE, B. J., DUFFY, J. E., GONZALEZ, A., HOOPER, D. U., PERRINGS, C., VENAIL, P., NARWANI, A., MACE, G. M., TILMAN, D., WARDLE, D. A., KINZIG, FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 39
A. P., DAILY, G. C., LOREAU, M., GRACE, J. B., LARIGAUDERIE, A., SRIVASTAVA, D. S. & NAEEM, S. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59. CASADEVALL, A. & PIROFSKI, L.-A. 2000. Host-Pathogen Interactions: Basic Concepts of Microbial Commensalism, Colonization, Infection, and Disease. Infection and Immunity, 68, 6511. CASTLEMAN, M. 2001. The New Healing Herbs: The Classic Guide to Nature's Best Medicines Featuring the Top 100 Time-Tested Herbs. CÁTIA, D. & MOREIRA, C. 2011. Planctomycetes True Colors: the carotenoid beyond their pigmentation. CHEN, Y. P., REKHA, P. D., ARUN, A. B., SHEN, F. T., LAI, W. A. & YOUNG, C. C. 2006. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Applied Soil Ecology, 34, 33-41. CHUNG, H., PARK, M., MADHAIYAN, M., SESHADRI, S., SONG, J., CHO, H. & SA, T. 2005. Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from the rhizosphere of crop plants of Korea. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 19701974. CLARKSON, D. T. 1985. Factors Affecting Mineral Nutrient Acquisition by Plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 36, 77-115. CLEMENTE, J. C., PEHRSSON, E. C., BLASER, M. J., SANDHU, K., GAO, Z., WANG, B., MAGRIS, M., HIDALGO, G., CONTRERAS, M., NOYA-ALARCON, O., LANDER, O., MCDONALD, J., COX, M., WALTER, J., OH, P. L., RUIZ, J. F., RODRIGUEZ, S., SHEN, N., SONG, S. J., METCALF, J., KNIGHT, R., DANTAS, G. & DOMINGUEZ-BELLO, M. G. 2015. The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians. Sci Adv, 1. COTE, C. K., HEFFRON, J. D., BOZUE, J. A. & WELKOS, S. L. 2015. Chapter 102 - Bacillus anthracis and Other Bacillus Species. In: TANG, Y.-W., SUSSMAN, M., LIU, D., POXTON, I. & SCHWARTZMAN, J. (eds.) Molecular Medical Microbiology (Second Edition). Boston: Academic Press. CRESSEY, D. 2013. Coffee rust regains foothold: researchers marshal technology in bid to thwart fungal outbreak in Central America. Nature, 493, 587. DELMONT, T. O., QUINCE, C., SHAIBER, A., ESEN, O. C., LEE, S. T. M., LUCKER, S. & EREN, A. M. 2017. Nitrogen-Fixing Populations Of Planctomycetes And Proteobacteria Are Abundant In The Surface Ocean. bioRxiv. DESALE, P., PATEL, B., SINGH, S., MALHOTRA, A. & NAWANI, N. 2013. Plant growth promoting properties of Halobacillus sp. and Halomonas sp. in presence of salinity and heavy metals. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 54, 781-791. ELANCHEZHIAN, C., RAMNATH, B. V., RAMAKRISHNAN, G., RAJENDRAKUMAR, M., NAVEENKUMAR, V. & SARAVANAKUMAR, M. K. 2018. Review on mechanical properties of natural fiber composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5, 1785- 1790. ENSLEY, S. M. 2012. Chapter 47 - Pyrethrins and pyrethroids. In: GUPTA, R. C. (ed.) Veterinary Toxicology (Second Edition). Boston: Academic Press. ERTURK, Y., ERCISLI, S., HAZNEDAR, A. & CAKMAKCI, R. 2010. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on rooting and root growth of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) stem cuttings. Biological Research, 43, 91-98. EVANS, L. T., AND BUSH, M. G 1985. Growth and development of channel millet (Echinochloa turnerana) in relation to its potential as a crop plant and compared with other Echinochloa millets, rice and wheat. Field Crops Research 12, 295317. FAUQUET, C. & FARGETTE, D. 1990. African Cassava Mosaic Virus: Etiology, Epidemiology, and Control. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 40
FOLEY, M. H., COCKBURN, D. W. & KOROPATKIN, N. M. 2016. The Sus operon: a model system for starch uptake by the human gut Bacteroidetes. Cell Mol Life Sci, 73, 2603-17. FONSECA-GARCÍA, C., COLEMAN-DERR, D., GARRIDO, E., VISEL, A., TRINGE, S. G. & PARTIDA-MARTÍNEZ, L. P. 2016. The Cacti Microbiome: Interplay between Habitat-Filtering and Host-Specificity. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7. FREITAS, T. A. K., SAITO, J. A., WAN, X., HOU, S. & ALAM, M. 2008. Chapter 7 - Protoglobin and Globin-coupled Sensors. In: GHOSH, A. (ed.) The Smallest Biomolecules: Diatomics and their Interactions with Heme Proteins. Amsterdam: Elsevier. FRIEDMAN, M., LEVIN, C. E., LEE, S. U., KIM, H. J., LEE, I. S., BYUN, J. O. & KOZUKUE, N. 2009. Tomatine-containing green tomato extracts inhibit growth of human breast, colon, liver, and stomach cancer cells. J Agric Food Chem, 57, 5727-33. FRY, W. 2008. Phytophthora infestans: the plant (and R gene) destroyer. Molecular Plant Pathology, 9, 385-402. FUERST, J. 2014. Planctomycetes: Cell Structure, Origins and Biology. GARRITY G. M., H. J. G. 2001. The road map to the Manual, Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 119–166. GAUNT, R. E. 1995. The Relationship Between Plant Disease Severity and Yield. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 33, 119-144. GENRE, A., CHABAUD, M., TIMMERS, T., BONFANTE, P. & BARKER, D. G. 2005. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Elicit a Novel Intracellular Apparatus in <em>Medicago truncatula</em> Root Epidermal Cells before Infection. The Plant Cell, 17, 3489. GEORGE, E., MARSCHNER, H. & JAKOBSEN, I. 1995. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Uptake of Phosphorus and Nitrogen From Soil. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 15, 257-270. GERDEMANN, J. W. 1968. Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Plant Growth. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 6, 397-418. GIBIINO, G., LOPETUSO, L. R., SCALDAFERRI, F., RIZZATTI, G., BINDA, C. & GASBARRINI, A. 2018. Exploring Bacteroidetes: Metabolic key points and immunological tricks of our gut commensals. Digestive and Liver Disease, 50, 635-639. GLICK, B. R. 2012. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications. Scientifica, 2012. GLICK, B. R. 2014. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiological Research, 169, 30-39. GONZÁLEZ, M., CID, M. C. & LOBO, M. G. 2011. Chapter 133 - Usage of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) Seeds in Health. In: PREEDY, V. R., WATSON, R. R. & PATEL, V. B. (eds.) Nuts and Seeds in Health and Disease Prevention. San Diego: Academic Press. GOSWAMI, D., VAGHELA, H., PARMAR, S., DHANDHUKIA, P. & THAKKER, J. N. 2013. Plant growth promoting potentials of Pseudomonas spp. strain OG isolated from marine water. Journal of Plant Interactions, 8, 281-290. GRAÇA, A. P., CALISTO, R. & LAGE, O. M. 2016. Planctomycetes as Novel Source of Bioactive Molecules. Frontiers in microbiology, 7, 1241-1241. GRONDIN, J. M., TAMURA, K., DEJEAN, G., ABBOTT, D. W. & BRUMER, H. 2017. Polysaccharide Utilization Loci: Fueling Microbial Communities. J Bacteriol, 199. GUPTA, A., GOPAL, M., THOMAS, G. V., MANIKANDAN, V., GAJEWSKI, J., THOMAS, G., SESHAGIRI, S., SCHUSTER, S. C., RAJESH, P. & GUPTA, R. 2014. Whole Genome Sequencing and Analysis of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Isolated FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 41
from the Rhizosphere of Plantation Crops Coconut, Cocoa and Arecanut. PLOS ONE, 9, e104259. GUREVITCH, J. & PADILLA, D. K. 2004. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 470-474. HAMMAD, Y., NALIN, R., MARECHAL, J., FIASSON, K., PEPIN, R., BERRY, A. M., NORMAND, P. & DOMENACH, A.-M. A possible role for phenyl acetic acid (PAA) on Alnus glutinosa nodulation by Frankia. In: NORMAND, P., DAWSON, J. O. & PAWLOWSKI, K., eds. Frankia Symbiosis, 2003// 2003 Dordrecht. Springer Netherlands, 193-205. HANADA, S. 2016. Anoxygenic Photosynthesis -A Photochemical Reaction That Does Not Contribute to Oxygen Reproduction. Microbes and environments, 31, 1-3. HANSSEN, I. M. & LAPIDOT, M. 2012. Chapter 2 - Major Tomato Viruses in the Mediterranean Basin. In: LOEBENSTEIN, G. & LECOQ, H. (eds.) Advances in Virus Research. Academic Press. HARRIS, P. 1974. A possible explanation of plant yield increases following insect damage. Agro-Ecosystems, 1, 219-225. HELM, A., HANSKI, I. & PÄRTEL, M. 2005. Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters, 9, 72-77. HIRSCH, A. M. 2009. Brief History of the Discovery of Nitrogen-fixing Organisms HOFFMANN, M. H. 2002. Biogeography of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Brassicaceae). Journal of Biogeography, 29, 125-134. INIATIATIVE, T. A. G. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 408, 796-815. ITÄVAARA, M., SALAVIRTA, H., MARJAMAA, K. & RUSKEENIEMI, T. 2016. Chapter One - Geomicrobiology and Metagenomics of Terrestrial Deep Subsurface Microbiomes. In: SARIASLANI, S. & GADD, G. M. (eds.) Advances in Applied Microbiology. Academic Press. IVANOV, II, FRUTOS RDE, L., MANEL, N., YOSHINAGA, K., RIFKIN, D. B., SARTOR, R. B., FINLAY, B. B. & LITTMAN, D. R. 2008. Specific microbiota direct the differentiation of IL-17-producing T-helper cells in the mucosa of the small intestine. Cell Host Microbe, 4, 337-49. JAYASINGHEARACHCHI, H. S. & SENEVIRATNE, G. 2004. A bradyrhizobial- Penicillium spp. biofilm with nitrogenase activity improves N2 fixing symbiosis of soybean. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40, 432-434. JENSEN, J. B., EGSGAARD, H., VAN ONCKELEN, H. & JOCHIMSEN, B. U. 1995. Catabolism of indole-3-acetic acid and 4- and 5-chloroindole-3-acetic acid in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J Bacteriol, 177, 5762-6. JESKE, O., SCHULER, M., SCHUMANN, P., SCHNEIDER, A., BOEDEKER, C., JOGLER, M., BOLLSCHWEILER, D., ROHDE, M., MAYER, C., ENGELHARDT, H., SPRING, S. & JOGLER, C. 2015. Planctomycetes do possess a peptidoglycan cell wall. Nat Commun, 6, 7116. JHA, C. K. & SARAF, M. 2012. Evaluation of Multispecies Plant-Growth-Promoting Consortia for the Growth Promotion of Jatropha curcas L. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 31, 588-598. JOHNSON, T. R., STEWART, S. L., DUTRA, D., KANE, M. E. & RICHARDSON, L. 2007. Asymbiotic and symbiotic seed germination of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae)— preliminary evidence for the symbiotic culture advantage. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 90, 313. KANG, S. M., KHAN, A. L., YOU, Y. H., KIM, J. G., KAMRAN, M. & LEE, I. J. 2014. Gibberellin production by newly isolated strain Leifsonia soli SE134 and its potential to promote plant growth. J Microbiol Biotechnol, 24, 106-12. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 42
KASIM, W. A., GAAFAR, R. M., ABOU-ALI, R. M., OMAR, M. N. & HEWAIT, H. M. 2016. Effect of biofilm forming plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on salinity tolerance in barley. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 61, 217-227. KEENAN, T. F., PRENTICE, I. C., CANADELL, J. G., WILLIAMS, C. A., WANG, H., RAUPACH, M. & COLLATZ, G. J. 2016. Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nature Communications, 7, 13428. KIM, J. & REES, D. C. 1994. Nitrogenase and biological nitrogen fixation. Biochemistry, 33, 389-397. KIRSEBOM, L. A., DASGUPTA, S. & FREDRIK PETTERSSON, B. M. 2012. Chapter Four - Pleiomorphism in Mycobacterium. In: SARIASLANI, S. & GADD, G. M. (eds.) Advances in Applied Microbiology. Academic Press. KOORNNEEF, M., ALONSO-BLANCO, C. & VREUGDENHIL, D. 2004. NATURALLY OCCURRING GENETIC VARIATION IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 141-172. KOORNNEEF, M. & MEINKE, D. 2010. The development of Arabidopsis as a model plant. Plant J, 61, 909-21. KÖRNER, C. 2004. Mountain biodiversity, its causes and function. Ambio, Spec No 13, 11-17. KUMAR, P. B. A. N., DUSHENKOV, V., MOTTO, H. & RASKIN, I. 1995. Phytoextraction: The Use of Plants To Remove Heavy Metals from Soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 1232-1238. KUSHALAPPA, A. C. & ESKES, A. B. 1989. Advances in Coffee Rust Research. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 27, 503-531. LAGE, O. M. & BONDOSO, J. 2011. Planctomycetes diversity associated with macroalgae. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 78, 366-75. LAGE, O. M. & BONDOSO, J. 2012. Bringing Planctomycetes into pure culture. Frontiers in microbiology, 3, 405-405. LANGÓ, Z. 2005. Data to the History of Planctomyces bekefii. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica, 52:1 73-84. LECHEVALIER, M. P. & LECHEVALIER, H. 1970. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 20, 435-443. LEHSTEN, V., WIIK, L., HANNUKKALA, A., ANDREASSON, E., CHEN, D., OU, T., LILJEROTH, E., LANKINEN, Å. & GRENVILLE-BRIGGS, L. 2017. Earlier occurrence and increased explanatory power of climate for the first incidence of potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans in Fennoscandia. PloS one, 12, e0177580-e0177580. LEVEAU, J. H. & LINDOW, S. E. 2005. Utilization of the plant hormone indole-3-acetic acid for growth by Pseudomonas putida strain 1290. Appl Environ Microbiol, 71, 2365-71. LINDEN, S. 2014. On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception:The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 430-440. LIS-BALCHIN, M. 2002. Lavender The Genus Lavandula. LIU, J., PATTEY, E., MILLER, J. R., MCNAIRN, H., SMITH, A. & HU, B. 2010. Estimating crop stresses, aboveground dry biomass and yield of corn using multi-temporal optical data combined with a radiation use efficiency model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 1167-1177. LOOMIS, R. S. & AMTHOR, J. S. 1999. Yield Potential, Plant Assimilatory Capacity, and Metabolic Efficiencies. 39, 1584-1596. LØVDAL, T., OLSEN, K. M., SLIMESTAD, R., VERHEUL, M. & LILLO, C. 2010. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 43
Synergetic effects of nitrogen depletion, temperature, and light on the content of phenolic compounds and gene expression in leaves of tomato. Phytochemistry, 71, 605-613. LUGTENBERG, B. & KAMILOVA, F. 2009. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol, 63, 541-56. LUGTENBERG, B. J. J., CHIN-A-WOENG, T. F. C. & BLOEMBERG, G. V. 2002. Microbe–plant interactions: principles and mechanisms. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 81, 373-383. LUNDBERG, D. S., LEBEIS, S. L., PAREDES, S. H., YOURSTONE, S., GEHRING, J., MALFATTI, S., TREMBLAY, J., ENGELBREKTSON, A., KUNIN, V., DEL RIO, T. G., EDGAR, R. C., EICKHORST, T., LEY, R. E., HUGENHOLTZ, P., TRINGE, S. G. & DANGL, J. L. 2012. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature, 488, 86-90. M. SFILIGOJ SMOLE, S. H., K. STANA KLEINSCHEK AND T. KREŽE 2013. Plant Fibres for Textile and Technical Applications. MALIK, S., CUSIDÓ, R. M., MIRJALILI, M. H., MOYANO, E., PALAZÓN, J. & BONFILL, M. 2011. Production of the anticancer drug taxol in Taxus baccata suspension cultures: A review. Process Biochemistry, 46, 23-34. MARCIANO, F. & VAJRO, P. 2017. Chapter 8 - Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota**Conflict of interest: None. In: GRACIA-SANCHO, J. & SALVADÓ, J. (eds.) Gastrointestinal Tissue. Academic Press. MARTENS, E. & DEMAIN, A. L. 2017. Chapter 7 - An Overview of the Industrial Aspects of Antibiotic Discovery. In: KURTBÖKE, I. (ed.) Microbial Resources. Academic Press. MARTIN, W. F., GARG, S. & ZIMORSKI, V. 2015. Endosymbiotic theories for eukaryote origin. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370. MARX, T. 2015. Chapter 35 - Immunoprotective Effects of Probiotics in the Elderly. In: WATSON, R. R. (ed.) Foods and Dietary Supplements in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease in Older Adults. San Diego: Academic Press. MASCLAUX-DAUBRESSE, C., DANIEL-VEDELE, F., DECHORGNAT, J., CHARDON, F., GAUFICHON, L. & SUZUKI, A. 2010. Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Annals of Botany, 105, 1141-1157. MCFALL-NGAI, M. J. 2002. Unseen Forces: The Influence of Bacteria on Animal Development. Developmental Biology, 242, 1-14. MOHAMMAD ATHAR, S. M. N. 2005. Taxonomic perspective of plant species yielding vegetable oils used in cosmetics and skin care products. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4, 36-44. MOREIRA, F. D. S., COSTA, P. B. D., SOUZA, R. D., BENEDUZI, A., LISBOA, B. B., VARGAS, L. K. & PASSAGLIA, L. M. P. 2016. Functional abilities of cultivable plant growth promoting bacteria associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops. Genetics and molecular biology, 39, 111-121. MOST, J., GOOSSENS, G. H., REIJNDERS, D., CANFORA, E. E., PENDERS, J. & BLAAK, E. E. 2017. Gut microbiota composition strongly correlates to peripheral insulin sensitivity in obese men but not in women. Benef Microbes, 8, 557-562. MOUZAKI, M., COMELLI, E. M., ARENDT, B. M., BONENGEL, J., FUNG, S. K., FISCHER, S. E., MCGILVRAY, I. D. & ALLARD, J. P. 2013. Intestinal microbiota in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology, 58, 120-7. NAUTIYAL, C. S. 2006. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 170, 265270. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 44
NG, E., CHEN, L., WANG, Y. & YUAN, C. 2012. A study on the cooling effects of greening in a high-density city: An experience from Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 47, 256-271. NOEL R. KRIEG, J. T. S., DANIEL R. BROWN,, BRIAN P. HEDLUND, B. J. P., NAOMI L. WARD, & WHITMAN, W. L. A. W. B. 2010. Systematic Bacteriology Volume 4, 25-40. OOMS, G., HOOYKAAS, P. J. J., MOOLENAAR, G. & SCHILPEROORT, R. A. 1981. Crown gall plant tumors of abnormal morphology, induced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying mutated octopine Ti plasmids; analysis of T-DNA functions. Gene, 14, 33-50. OP DEN CAMP, H. J. M., JETTEN, M. S. M. & STROUS, M. 2007. Chapter 16 - Anammox. In: BOTHE, H., FERGUSON, S. J. & NEWTON, W. E. (eds.) Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ORR, D. J., PEREIRA, A. M., DA FONSECA PEREIRA, P., PEREIRA-LIMA, Í. A., ZSÖGÖN, A. & ARAÚJO, W. L. 2017. Engineering photosynthesis: progress and perspectives. F1000Research, 6, 1891-1891. OTEINO, N., LALLY, R. D., KIWANUKA, S., LLOYD, A., RYAN, D., GERMAINE, K. J. & DOWLING, D. N. 2015. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Frontiers in microbiology, 6, 745745. PEDRAZA, R. O., RAMÍREZ-MATA, A., XIQUI, M. L. & BACA, B. E. 2004. Aromatic amino acid aminotransferase activity and indole-3-acetic acid production by associative nitrogen-fixing bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 233, 15-21. POPE, P. B., MACKENZIE, A. K., GREGOR, I., SMITH, W., SUNDSET, M. A., MCHARDY, A. C., MORRISON, M. & EIJSINK, V. G. H. 2012. Metagenomics of the Svalbard Reindeer Rumen Microbiome Reveals Abundance of Polysaccharide Utilization Loci. PLOS ONE, 7, e38571. PROBANZA, A., LUCAS GARCıA, J. A., RUIZ PALOMINO, M., RAMOS, B. & ́ GUTIÉRREZ MAÑERO, F. J. 2002. Pinus pinea L. seedling growth and bacterial rhizosphere structure after inoculation with PGPR Bacillus (B. licheniformis CECT 5106 and B. pumilus CECT 5105). Applied Soil Ecology, 20, 75-84. PROSSER, J. I. 2007. Chapter 15 - The Ecology of Nitrifying Bacteria. In: BOTHE, H., FERGUSON, S. J. & NEWTON, W. E. (eds.) Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle. Amsterdam: Elsevier. PUENTE, M. E., LI, C. Y. & BASHAN, Y. 2009. Rock-degrading endophytic bacteria in cacti. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 66, 389-401. PULVERER, G., SCHÜTT-GEROWITT, H. & SCHAAL, K. P. 2003. Human Cervicofacial Actinomycoses: Microbiological Data for 1997 Cases. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 37, 490-497. QAMAR, N., REHMAN, Y. & HASNAIN, S. 2017. Arsenic-resistant and plant growthpromoting Firmicutes and gamma-Proteobacteria species from industrially polluted irrigation water and corresponding cropland. J Appl Microbiol, 123, 748758. QIAO, Q., WANG, F., ZHANG, J., CHEN, Y., ZHANG, C., LIU, G., ZHANG, H., MA, C. & ZHANG, J. 2017. The Variation in the Rhizosphere Microbiome of Cotton with Soil Type, Genotype and Developmental Stage. Scientific Reports, 7, 3940. RAHMAN, A., SITEPU, I. R., TANG, S.-Y. & HASHIDOKO, Y. 2010. Salkowski’s Reagent Test as a Primary Screening Index for Functionalities of Rhizobacteria Isolated from Wild Dipterocarp Saplings Growing Naturally on Medium-Strongly Acidic Tropical Peat Soil. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 74, 2202-2208. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 45
RATHCKE, B. J. & JULES, E. S. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant–pollinator interactions. Current Science, 65, 273-277. RODRIGUEZ, H. & FRAGA, R. 1999. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv, 17, 319-39. RODRÍGUEZ, H., FRAGA, R., GONZALEZ, T. & BASHAN, Y. 2006. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growthpromoting bacteria. Plant and Soil, 287, 15-21. ROJAS-TAPIAS, D., MORENO-GALVÁN, A., PARDO-DÍAZ, S., OBANDO, M., RIVERA, D. & BONILLA, R. 2012. Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Applied Soil Ecology, 61, 264-272. SAHAY, H., MAHFOOZ, S., SINGH, A. K., SINGH, S., KAUSHIK, R., SAXENA, A. K. & ARORA, D. K. 2012. Exploration and characterization of agriculturally and industrially important haloalkaliphilic bacteria from environmental samples of hypersaline Sambhar lake, India. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28, 3207-3217. SASIREKHA, B. & SRIVIDYA, S. 2016. Siderophore production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa FP6, a biocontrol strain for Rhizoctonia solani and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing diseases in chilli. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 50, 250-256. SAX, DOV F., GAINES, STEVEN D. & BROWN, JAMES H. 2002. Species Invasions Exceed Extinctions on Islands Worldwide: A Comparative Study of Plants and Birds. The American Naturalist, 160, 766-783. SCHOLTHOF, K.-B. G., ADKINS, S., CZOSNEK, H., PALUKAITIS, P., JACQUOT, E., HOHN, T., HOHN, B., SAUNDERS, K., CANDRESSE, T., AHLQUIST, P., HEMENWAY, C. & FOSTER, G. D. 2011. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology, 12, 938-954. SEYEDSAYAMDOST, M. R., TRAXLER, M. F., CLARDY, J. & KOLTER, R. 2012. Chapter Five - Old Meets New: Using Interspecies Interactions to Detect Secondary Metabolite Production in Actinomycetes. In: HOPWOOD, D. A. (ed.) Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press. SHARMIN, F., WAKELIN, S., HUYGENS, F. & HARGREAVES, M. 2013. Firmicutes dominate the bacterial taxa within sugar-cane processing plants. Scientific Reports, 3, 3107. SIDDIQUI, Z. A. 2006. PGPR: Prospective Biocontrol Agents of Plant Pathogens. In: SIDDIQUI, Z. A. (ed.) PGPR: Biocontrol and Biofertilization. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. SIMON, J. & KRONECK, P. M. H. 2013. Chapter Two - Microbial Sulfite Respiration. In: POOLE, R. K. (ed.) Advances in Microbial Physiology. Academic Press. SINGH, R. P., HODSON, D. P., HUERTA-ESPINO, J., JIN, Y., BHAVANI, S., NJAU, P., HERRERA-FOESSEL, S., SINGH, P. K., SINGH, S. & GOVINDAN, V. 2011. The Emergence of Ug99 Races of the Stem Rust Fungus is a Threat to World Wheat Production. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 49, 465-481. SINGH, R. P., HODSON, D. P., JIN, Y., LAGUDAH, E. S., AYLIFFE, M. A., BHAVANI, S., ROUSE, M. N., PRETORIUS, Z. A., SZABO, L. J., HUERTA-ESPINO, J., BASNET, B. R., LAN, C. & HOVMØLLER, M. S. 2015. Emergence and Spread of New Races of Wheat Stem Rust Fungus: Continued Threat to Food Security and Prospects of Genetic Control. Phytopathology, 105, 872-884. SKOOG, T. M. F. 1962. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 46
SMITH, F. A. & SMITH, S. E. 1997. Tansley Review No. 96 Structural diversity in (vesicular)–arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytologist, 137, 373-388. SOWANI, H., KULKARNI, M., ZINJARDE, S. & JAVDEKAR, V. 2017. Chapter 7 - Gordonia and Related Genera as Opportunistic Human Pathogens Causing Infections of Skin, Soft Tissues, and Bones. In: KON, K. & RAI, M. (eds.) The Microbiology of Skin, Soft Tissue, Bone and Joint Infections. Academic Press. SPAEPEN, S. & VANDERLEYDEN, J. 2011. Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 3. SPAEPEN, S., VANDERLEYDEN, J. & REMANS, R. 2007. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 31, 425-48. SRINIVASAN, D., NATHAN, S., SURESH, T. & LAKSHMANA PERUMALSAMY, P. 2001. Antimicrobial activity of certain Indian medicinal plants used in folkloric medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 74, 217-220. STAUFFER, E., DOLAN, J. A. & NEWMAN, R. 2008. CHAPTER 12 - Interpretation of Ignitable Liquid Residues Extracted from Fire Debris. In: STAUFFER, E., DOLAN, J. A. & NEWMAN, R. (eds.) Fire Debris Analysis. Burlington: Academic Press. STEWART, D. & SHEPHERD, L. V. T. 2013. 9 - Metabolomics for the safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) crops. In: WEIMER, B. C. & SLUPSKY, C. (eds.) Metabolomics in Food and Nutrition. Woodhead Publishing. STEWART, W. D. P. 1977. Nitrogen Fixation by Free-Living Micro-Organisms. Soil Science, 123, 135. STRUEMPLER, R. E. 1987. Excretion of Codeine and Morphine Following Ingestion of Poppy Seeds. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 11, 97-99. STURZ, A. V., CHRISTIE, B. R. & NOWAK, J. 2000. Bacterial Endophytes: Potential Role in Developing Sustainable Systems of Crop Production. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 19, 1-30. SUAREZ, C., RATERING, S., GEISSLER-PLAUM, R. & SCHNELL, S. 2014. Hartmannibacter diazotrophicus gen. nov., sp. nov., a phosphate-solubilizing and nitrogen-fixing alphaproteobacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of a natural salt-meadow plant. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 64, 3160-3167. TAIZ 1980. Plant physiology and development. Science (New York, N.Y.), 210, 11191119. TAIZ, L. & ZEIGER, E. 2002. Plant Physiology. Annals of Botany, 690-690. TIAN, B., SUN, Z., SHEN, S., WANG, H., JIAO, J., WANG, L., HU, Y. & HUA, Y. 2009. Effects of carotenoids from Deinococcus radiodurans on protein oxidation. Lett Appl Microbiol, 49, 689-94. VAN DER HEIJDEN, M. G. A. 2010. Mycorrhizal fungi reduce nutrient loss from model grassland ecosystems. Ecology, 91, 1163-1171. VERMA, R. & MELCHER, U. 2012. A Support Vector Machine based method to distinguish proteobacterial proteins from eukaryotic plant proteins. BMC bioinformatics, 13 Suppl 15, S9-S9. VOLLMER, W. 2015. Chapter 6 - Peptidoglycan. In: TANG, Y.-W., SUSSMAN, M., LIU, D., POXTON, I. & SCHWARTZMAN, J. (eds.) Molecular Medical Microbiology (Second Edition). Boston: Academic Press. VOYTAS, D. F. & GAO, C. 2014. Precision Genome Engineering and Agriculture: Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges. PLOS Biology, 12, e1001877. WENG, J.-K., LI, X., BONAWITZ, N. D. & CHAPPLE, C. 2008. Emerging strategies of lignin engineering and degradation for cellulosic biofuel production. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 19, 166-172. WEXLER, H. M. 2007. Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin Microbiol Rev, 20, 593-621. FCUP Use of environmental bacteria as plant growth promoters 47
WONG, M. H. 2003. Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 50, 775-780. YE, X., AL-BABILI, S., KLÖTI, A., ZHANG, J., LUCCA, P., BEYER, P. & POTRYKUS, I. 2000. Engineering the Provitamin A (β-Carotene) Biosynthetic Pathway into (Carotenoid-Free) Rice Endosperm. Science, 287, 303. YOUNG, V. R. & PELLETT, P. L. 1994. Plant proteins in relation to human protein and amino acid nutrition. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59, 1203S1212S. ZAHRAN, H. H. 2001. Rhizobia from wild legumes: diversity, taxonomy, ecology, nitrogen fixation and biotechnology. J Biotechnol, 91, 143-53. ZHANG, X., HENRIQUES, R., LIN, S.-S., NIU, Q.-W. & CHUA, N.-H. 2006. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nature Protocols, 1, 641. ZHAO, Z., LIU, H., WANG, C. & XU, J.-R. 2013. Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics, 14, 274.