Note to Users

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Note to Users NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. The naîural history of ButhypoZyppus arcticus (Prosch), a deep-sea octopus. by James B. Wood Submitted in partial fdfdhent of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of PhiIosophy DaIhousie University Hahhq Nova Scotia April2000 O Copyright by James B. Wood, 2000 National Library Bibliothèque nationale I+I,canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibiiographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r8fërence Our fi& Notre raférence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive Licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothéque nationale du Canada de reproduce, Ioan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/^, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts f?om it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Dedicated to Deborah and David Wood and In memory of Mi. J. Gregory Table of contents List of figures and tables ............................................... vü Abstract ............................................................ xi List of abbreviations and symbois wd..................................... W Achowledgments ................................................... xiii Prefàce ........................................................... xiv Chapter1.Introduction ................................................. 1 Cephalopodar Past and Present ................................... 2 Rearing and studying natural bistory of octopuses: confounding fhctors ... 12 Bathypolypus arcticus: A mode1 for deep-sea octopuses ............... 14 Chapter 2 . First growth rates of deep sea octopus Bathypolpus arcticus on fivediets ................................................. 29 Abstract ................................................... 30 Introduction ................................................ 31 Materialsandmethods ........................................ 37 Results ....................................................44 Discussion ................................................. 52 Chapter 3 .Rearing deep-sea octopus (Bathpolpus arcticus) at temperatures fkom2-10°C ..............................................63 Abstract ................................................... 64 Introduction ................................................ 65 Materials and methods ........................................ 67 Reds ....................................................74 Discussion ................................................. 83 Conclusions ................................................ 94 Chapter 4. Reproduction and embryonic development time of Bafhpolypus arcticus. a deep-sea octopod (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) .............. 95 Abstract ................................................... 96 Introduction ................................................ 97 Methods ................................................... 98 Results ................................................... 102 Discussion ................................................ 109 Chapter 5 .Do larger cephalopods live longer? The effects of temperature and phylogeny on interspecific comparisons of age and size at rnatunty ..... 115 Abstract .................................................. 116 Introduction ............................................... 117 Materials and methods ....................................... 120 Redts ................................................... 133 Discussion and concIusions ................................... 134 Chapter 6. Summary of results .......................................... 146 Su- ofnew contriibutions of this thesis ....................... 147 Summary and cornparison ofthe life cycle and ecology of B. mcticus .... 149 Final thoughts on size at ma* and temperature .................. 156 Futuredlrdons ........................................... 156 Technical Note 1 .Does weighmg stress affect the growth rate of octopuses? ....... 162 Technical Note 2. First growth data and prey choice for a coM water octopus. ButhypoZypt(s mcticus ................................. 175 Appendix 1 . Cephalopod predators ..... ,. ............................... 182 AppendSc 2. Cephalopod prey .......................................... 193 Appendix 3 . Cephalopod specimens donated to museum collections ............. 217 Appdîx 4 . Growth rates of hatchlnig BathypoZypus arcticus fed fie differentfoods ........................................... 222 Appendix 5 . Bathypolypus mctiais growth at three different temperatures ........ 238 Appendk 6. Cdculations used in Chapter 5 ................................ 241 Appendix 7 . Does Bathypolpus arcticus contain antiikeeze? ................... 248 References ......................................................... 249 List of figures and tables Chapter 1 Figures: Fig. 1. Age at maturity in years for three classes of molluscs ..................... 6 Fig. 2. This aduit wiki octopus (Octopbrimeus) was out hunting at night in theDryTortugasNationalParkinthe~ondaKeys ..................... 10 Fig. 3. The large, weIl developed eggs of Octops briorem are shown above ........ 11 Fig, 4. Hatchling deep-sea octopus, Bafhypolypusmcticz~s ..................... 15 Fig. 5. Average yield per tow of B. arcticus at various depths based on 486 tows done during 5 scallop assessrnent cruises in 1995 and 1996 ........... 17 Fig. 6. Number of octopuses found m tows over different bottom types. Raw data from Peter Auster. This initiaIly suppfied evidence that B. arcticus is found on mud and sand bottoms .................................. 18 Fig. 7. AU octopuses m Peter Amer's data sets were collected over sand or mud bottoms, although these were also the deepest tows. Thus the preferred bottom type of B. arcticus is still uncertaia The numbers to the right of the dark circles indicate the number of octopuses captured in the tow. Open circles represent tows where no octopuses were captured ............ 19 Tables: Table 1. Taxonomy in the WyOctopodidae following Sweeney and Roper 1998. Tbere are a number of deep-ses genera that are poorly studied or not studied ...................................................... 25 .Chapter2 Figures: Fig. 1. Location of adult octopuses collecteci fkom the Bay of Fundy in the summerofl995 ................................................ 38 Fig. 2. The changes in wet weight of hatchling octopuses over the. The fitted exponentiai growth equations are: live volutator: PO. 199e0-0M7' (M.75, p=O.OOOl), live Gammarus spp.: y=0.207e0-m3<"(M.34, FO.000 1), Sozen Gmmmspp.: y+. 194e4-M'"(&l.~~,p=û.69), Ophiopholis sp. :y0.1 97e4-W24t (*. 11, p=0.004), fiozen haddock: y=0.202e4.MaSt(W. 15, p=O.OO1).Where y is octopus weight m grams and t is tbe m days. Octopuses only ghed weight when fèd livefood ...................................................... 46 Fig. 3. Percent &al for octopuses in the fÏve treatments. Survival of octopuses was highest in the two hefood treatments ................... 50 Tables: Table 1. Prey species. This was determhed nom the % of Bat?zypolpus arcticus which contained tbat type of prey in their stomachs (modified fiom O'Dor and Macalaster 1983) ..................................... 36 Table 2. Corry,arjsons of the instantanmus relative growth rates (G) and physiologïcal instantaneous growth rate for some cephalopods ............ 49 Table 3. Nutritional content and energy per gram for the four food items used ....... 53 Table 4. Cornparison of the Gross Growth Efficiency (GGE) and food intake for severaIspeciesofoctopus ....................................... 60 Chapter 3 Figures: Fig. 1. Simplined diagram of the flow-through system and room set-up used in this expriment. Anhient water was used instead of chilled water in the winter when the ambient temperature was low ......................... 69 Fig. 2. Distriiution of Bathypolp arcticus along the east coast of North America, Data nom Macalaster (1976) ............................... 7 1 Fig. 3. Average sizes of octopuses in the four experimental treatments. Octopuses kept at 10°C grew much Merthan those at Iower naturd temperatures ...... 79 Fig. 4. Conservative estimates of age at maturity for B. arcticus at 4 Merent temperatUres. The longest lived octopuses in the 6°C and 10°C treatment are shown for cornparison along with the entire Hie span of the Florida Pygmy Octopus (Ocropus sp. 'Bubinf'). This mode1 predicts that on average, B. arcticus living at their naturai temperatures of 4°C take at least 6 years to reach maturity ................................. Tables: Table 1. Average weights (in grams), standard deviation and -le size for octopuses in each of the temperature treatments ....................... 75 Table 2. Growth rates (G) and physiological growth rates (G/T)of various species of hatchling octopuses. See the slopes on Table 3 for the gro wth rates fkom the regression equations Even when temperature is corrected for by ushg degree-days, B. arcticus grow very slowly compared with octopuses
Recommended publications
  • REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus Bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO
    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO ACADÉMICO DE MAESTRO EN CIENCIAS PRESENTA BIÓL. MAR. SHEILA CASTELLANOS MARTINEZ La Paz, B.C.S., Agosto de 2008 AGRADECIMIENTOS Agradezco al Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas por abrirme las puertas para llevar a cabo mis estudios de maestría, así como al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) y a los proyectos PIFI por el respaldo económico brindado durante dicho periodo. Deseo expresar mi agradecimiento a mis directores, Dr. Marcial Arellano Martínez y Dr. Federico A. García Domínguez por apoyarme para aprender a revisar cortes histológicos (algo que siempre dije que no haría jaja!), lidiar con mis carencias de conocimiento, enseñarme cosas nuevas y ayudarme a encauzar las ideas. Gracias también a la Dra. Patricia Ceballos (Pati) por la asesoría con las numerosas dudas que surgieron a lo largo de este estudio, las correcciones y por enseñarme algunos trucos para que los cortes histológicos me quedaran bien. Los valiosos comentarios del Dr. Oscar E. Holguín Quiñones y M.C. Marcial Villalejo Fuerte definitivamente han sido imprescindibles para concluir satisfactoriamente este trabajo. A todos, gracias por contribuir en mi formación profesional y personal. Quiero extender mi gratitud al Dr. Gustavo Danemann (PRONATURA Noroeste, A.C.) así como al Lic. Esteban Torreblanca (PRONATURA Noroeste, A.C.) por todo su apoyo para el desarrollo de la tesis; igualmente, a la Asociación de Buzos de Bahía de Los Ángeles, A.C. por su importante participación en la obtención de muestras y por el interés activo que siempre han mostrado hacia este estudio.
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalopoda: Sepiidae) Ott the South Coast of Southern Africa *
    S. Afr. I. Zool. 1993,28(2) 99 Biological and ecological aspects of the distribution of Sepia australis (Cephalopoda: Sepiidae) otT the south coast of southern Africa * Martina A. Compagno Roeleveld ** South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 Republic of South Africa M.R. Lipinski *** Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa Michelle G. van der Merwe South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa Received 9 June 1992; accepted 6 October 1992 During the South Coast Biomass Survey in 1988, 49,4 kg (6336 individuals) of Sepia australis were caught between Cape Agulhas and Algoa Bay. A biomass index of 803 t of S. australis was calculated for the area at that time. Largest catches were taken between about 20"E and 22"E, in waters of 10-11°C and 50-150 m depth. The overall sex ratio was 2M: 3F and mean individual mass was 6,47 9 for males and 8,67 9 for females. The largest animals were a mature male of 58 mm mantle length and a maturing female of 65 mm mantle length. Most of the animals trawled off the South Coast were maturing or fully mature in early winter and very few immature animals were found. Differences in mean mantle length and maturity stage of the animals in different areas were found to be correlated most strongly with water temperature but also with depth and longitude. Largest numbers and mean sizes of mature animals caught suggest that the main spawning grounds off the South Coast may be in deeper water on the western side of the Agulhas Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Monitoring of Eelgrass Resources in Newport Bay Newport Beach, California
    MARINE TAXONOMIC SERVICES, LTD 2020 Monitoring of Eelgrass Resources in Newport Bay Newport Beach, California December 25, 2020 Prepared For: City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact: Chris Miller, Public Works Manager [email protected], (949) 644-3043 Newport Harbor Shallow-Water and Deep-Water Eelgrass Survey Prepared By: MARINE TAXONOMIC SERVICES, LLC COASTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC 920 RANCHEROS DRIVE, STE F-1 23 Morning Wood Drive SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 2020 NEWPORT BAY EELGRASS RESOURCES REPORT Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ ii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................................. iii Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Species Likely to Benefit from Marine Protected Areas in The
    Appendix C: Species Likely to Benefit from MPAs andSpecial-Status Species This appendix contains two sections: C.1 Species likely to benefit from marine protected areas in the MLPA South Coast Study Region C.2 Special status species likely to occur in the MLPA South Coast Study Region C.1 Species Likely to Benefit From MPAs The Marine Life Protection Act requires that species likely to benefit from MPAs be identified; identification of these species will contribute to the identification of habitat areas that will support achieving the goals of the MLPA. The California Marine Life Protection Act Master Plan for Marine Protected Areas (DFG 2008) includes a broad list of species likely to benefit from protection within MPAs. The master plan also indicates that regional lists will be developed by the MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team (SAT) for each study region described in the master plan. A list of species likely to benefit for the MLPA South Coast Study Region (Point Conception in Santa Barbara County to the California/Mexico border in San Diego County) has been compiled and approved by the SAT. The SAT used a scoring system to develop the list of species likely to benefit. This scoring system was developed to provide a metric that is more useful when comparing species than a simple on/off the list metric. Each species was scored using “1” to indicate a criterion was met or “0” to indicate a criterion was not met. Species on the list meet the following filtering criteria: they occur in the study region, they must score a “1” for either
    [Show full text]
  • Life History, Mating Behavior, and Multiple Paternity in Octopus
    LIFE HISTORY, MATING BEHAVIOR, AND MULTIPLE PATERNITY IN OCTOPUS OLIVERI (BERRY, 1914) (CEPHALOPODA: OCTOPODIDAE) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI´I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY DECEMBER 2014 By Heather Anne Ylitalo-Ward Dissertation Committee: Les Watling, Chairperson Rob Toonen James Wood Tom Oliver Jeff Drazen Chuck Birkeland Keywords: Cephalopod, Octopus, Sexual Selection, Multiple Paternity, Mating DEDICATION To my family, I would not have been able to do this without your unending support and love. Thank you for always believing in me. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all of the people who helped me collect the specimens for this study, braving the rocks and the waves in the middle of the night: Leigh Ann Boswell, Shannon Evers, and Steffiny Nelson, you were the hard core tako hunters. I am eternally grateful that you sacrificed your evenings to the octopus gods. Also, thank you to David Harrington (best bucket boy), Bert Tanigutchi, Melanie Hutchinson, Christine Ambrosino, Mark Royer, Chelsea Szydlowski, Ily Iglesias, Katherine Livins, James Wood, Seth Ylitalo-Ward, Jessica Watts, and Steven Zubler. This dissertation would not have happened without the support of my wonderful advisor, Dr. Les Watling. Even though I know he wanted me to study a different kind of “octo” (octocoral), I am so thankful he let me follow my foolish passion for cephalopod sexual selection. Also, he provided me with the opportunity to ride in a submersible, which was one of the most magical moments of my graduate career.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Ecology of Enteroctopus Megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in Southern Chile Christian M
    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2008, 88(4), 793–798. #2008 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom doi:10.1017/S0025315408001227 Printed in the United Kingdom Feeding ecology of Enteroctopus megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in southern Chile christian m. ibanez~ 1 and javier v. chong2 1Instituto de Ecologı´a y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecolo´gicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, PO Box 563, Santiago, Chile, 2Departamento de Ecologı´a Costera, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Cato´lica de la Santı´sima Concepcio´n, P.O. BOX 297, Concepcio´n, Chile In this research we studied the diet of Enteroctopus megalocyathus from three principal locations of the octopus fishery (Ancud, Quello´n and Melinka) in southern Chile. The gastric contents of 523 individuals, collected between October 1999 and September 2000, were examined and statistically analysed. Diet composition was described using detrended correspon- dence analysis and analysed as a function of predator gender, body size and fishing area. Food items were found in ~50% of the octopuses examined and a total of 14 prey items were recognized. The diet of E. megalocyathus consisted primarily in brachyuran and anomuran crustaceans, fish and conspecifics. The diet differed in composition between fishing zones and mantle length of the specimens and size of octopuses varied between locations. After adjusting for octopus mantle length, diet composition was found to be different between fishing areas. Large octopuses fed on large crabs at Ancud, while in Quello´n and Melinka small octopuses fed mainly on small crustaceans. There were no differences in prey composition between the gender and the size of octopuses was a better predictor of the variance in the diet composition (16%) than the fishing zone (6%).
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Cephalopod Distributions and Their Associated Predatorspor 146 209..227 Kathleen Gardiner & Terry A
    Arctic cephalopod distributions and their associated predatorspor_146 209..227 Kathleen Gardiner & Terry A. Dick Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada Keywords Abstract Arctic Ocean; Canada; cephalopods; distributions; oceanography; predators. Cephalopods are key species of the eastern Arctic marine food web, both as prey and predator. Their presence in the diets of Arctic fish, birds and mammals Correspondence illustrates their trophic importance. There has been considerable research on Terry A. Dick, Biological Sciences, University cephalopods (primarily Gonatus fabricii) from the north Atlantic and the west of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, side of Greenland, where they are considered a potential fishery and are taken Canada. E-mail: [email protected] as a by-catch. By contrast, data on the biogeography of Arctic cephalopods are doi:10.1111/j.1751-8369.2010.00146.x still incomplete. This study integrates most known locations of Arctic cepha- lopods in an attempt to locate potential areas of interest for cephalopods, and the predators that feed on them. International and national databases, museum collections, government reports, published articles and personal communica- tions were used to develop distribution maps. Species common to the Canadian Arctic include: G. fabricii, Rossia moelleri, R. palpebrosa and Bathypolypus arcticus. Cirroteuthis muelleri is abundant in the waters off Alaska, Davis Strait and Baffin Bay. Although distribution data are still incomplete, groupings of cephalopods were found in some areas that may be correlated with oceanographic variables. Understanding species distributions and their interactions within the ecosys- tem is important to the study of a warming Arctic Ocean and the selection of marine protected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biotope Sensitivity Database to Underpin Delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the Seas Around England and Scotland
    English Nature Research Reports Number 499 A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland Harvey Tyler-Walters Keith Hiscock This report has been prepared by the Marine Biological Association of the UK (MBA) as part of the work being undertaken in the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). The report is part of a contract placed by English Nature, additionally supported by Scottish Natural Heritage, to assist in the provision of sensitivity information to underpin the implementation of the Habitats Directive and the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The views expressed in the report are not necessarily those of the funding bodies. Any errors or omissions contained in this report are the responsibility of the MBA. February 2003 You may reproduce as many copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains, jointly, with English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. ISSN 0967-876X © Joint copyright 2003 English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. Biotope sensitivity database Final report This report should be cited as: TYLER-WALTERS, H. & HISCOCK, K., 2003. A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland. Report to English Nature and Scottish Natural Heritage from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. [Final Report] 2 Biotope sensitivity database Final report Contents Foreword and acknowledgements.............................................................................................. 5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction to the project ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries
    Advances in Cephalopod Science:Biology, Ecology, Cultivation and Fisheries,Vol 67 (2014) Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 67 published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From: Paul G.K. Rodhouse, Graham J. Pierce, Owen C. Nichols, Warwick H.H. Sauer, Alexander I. Arkhipkin, Vladimir V. Laptikhovsky, Marek R. Lipiński, Jorge E. Ramos, Michaël Gras, Hideaki Kidokoro, Kazuhiro Sadayasu, João Pereira, Evgenia Lefkaditou, Cristina Pita, Maria Gasalla, Manuel Haimovici, Mitsuo Sakai and Nicola Downey. Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries. In Erica A.G. Vidal, editor: Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 67, Oxford: United Kingdom, 2014, pp. 99-233. ISBN: 978-0-12-800287-2 © Copyright 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Academic Press Advances in CephalopodAuthor's Science:Biology, personal Ecology, copy Cultivation and Fisheries,Vol 67 (2014) CHAPTER TWO Environmental Effects on Cephalopod Population Dynamics: Implications for Management of Fisheries Paul G.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys of the Fish Resources of Namibia
    ANNEX II RECORDS OF FISHING STATIONS R/V "DR. FRIDTJOF NANSEN" SURVEY:1991401 STATION: 501 DATE :27/01/1991 GEAR TYPE: BT NO: 1 POSITION:Lat S 28°40.02 R/V "DR. FRIDTJOF NANSEN" SURVEY:1991401 STATION: 505 start stop duration Lon E 16°13.98 DATE :27/01/1991 GEAR TYPE: BT NO: 1 POSITION:Lat S 29°22.98 TIME :07:00:00 07:30:00 30.0 (min) Purpose : 3 start stop duration Lon E 14°51.00 LOG : 3992.20 3993.40 1.5 Region : 1 TIME :18:20:00 18:30:00 10.0 (min) Purpose : 3 FDEPTH: 81 78 Gear cond.: 0 LOG : 4073.60 4073.80 0.2 Region : 1 BDEPTH: 81 78 Validity : 0 FDEPTH: 237 235 Gear cond.: 8 Towing dir: 138° Wire out : 400 m Speed : 3.0 kn BDEPTH: 237 235 Validity : 9 Sorted : 70 Total catch: 69.80 Catch/hour: 139.60 Towing dir: 248° Wire out : 850 m Speed : 0.3 kn Sorted : 58 Total catch: 58.00 Catch/hour: 348.00 SPECIES CATCH/HOUR % OF TOT. C SAMP weight numbers SPECIES CATCH/HOUR % OF TOT. C SAMP Chelidonichthys capensis 67.80 360 48.57 weight numbers Merluccius capensis, female 23.00 122 16.48 2 Lepidopus caudatus 159.60 1752 45.86 Krill 20.00 0 14.33 Helicolenus dactylopterus 67.80 636 19.48 18 Callorhinchus capensis 8.60 10 6.16 Merluccius capensis, female 58.20 24 16.72 17 Jasus lalandii 5.00 46 3.58 Zeus capensis 37.80 252 10.86 Merluccius capensis, male 4.60 24 3.30 1 Callorhinchus capensis 15.00 6 4.31 Austroglossus microlepis 4.20 26 3.01 Todarodes sagittatus 6.60 6 1.90 Sufflogobius bibarbatus 3.20 450 2.29 Callanthias legras 1.80 12 0.52 Merluccius capensis, juvenile 3.20 150 2.29 3 Holohalaelurus regani 1.20 6 0.34 Trachurus capensis 0.00 2 0.00 __________ ________ Etrumeus whiteheadi 0.00 42 0.00 Total 348.00 100.00 Engraulis capensis 0.00 6 0.00 __________ ________ Total 139.60 100.00 R/V "DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelp Forest Monitoring Handbook — Volume 1: Sampling Protocol
    KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL Channel Islands National Park Gary E. Davis David J. Kushner Jennifer M. Mondragon Jeff E. Mondragon Derek Lerma Daniel V. Richards National Park Service Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, California 93001 November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 MONITORING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... Species Selection ...........................................................................................2 Site Selection .................................................................................................3 Sampling Technique Selection .......................................................................3 SAMPLING METHOD PROTOCOL......................................................................... General Information .......................................................................................8 1 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................9 5 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................11 Band Transects ...............................................................................................13 Random Point Contacts ..................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing Cephalopod Boreholes in Shells and the Northward Spread of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 (Cephalopoda, Octopodoidea)
    Vita Malacologica 13: 53-56 20 December 2015 Recognizing cephalopod boreholes in shells and the northward spread of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 (Cephalopoda, Octopodoidea) Auke-Florian HIEMSTRA Middelstegracht 20B, 2312 TW Leiden, The Netherlands email: [email protected] Key words: Cephalopods, Octopus , predation, hole-boring, The Netherlands ABSTRACT & Arnold, 1969; Wodinsky, 1969; Hartwick et al., 1978; Boyle & Knobloch, 1981; Cortez et al., 1998; Steer & Octopuses prey on molluscs by boring through their shell. Semmens, 2003; Anderson et al., 2008; for taxonomical Among the regular naticid borings, traces of cephalopod pre - updates see Norman & Hochberg, 2005). However, the habit dation should be found soon on Dutch beaches. Bottom trawl - of drilling may prove to be more widespread within octopods ing has declined, and by the effects of global warming since only few species have actually been investigated Octopus will find its way back to the North Sea where it lived (Bromley, 1993). Drilled holes were found in polypla - before. I describe the distinguishing characters for Octopus cophoran, gastropod and bivalve mollusc shells, Nautilus and bore holes, give an introduction into this type of behaviour, crustacean carapaces (Tucker & Mapes, 1978; Saunders et al., present a short history of Dutch octopuses and a prediction of 1991; Nixon & Boyle, 1982; Guerra & Nixon, 1987; Nixon et their future. al., 1988; Mather & Nixon, 1990; Nixon, 1987). Arnold & Arnold (1969) and Wodinsky (1969) both describe the act of drilling in detail. This behaviour consists INTRODUCTION of the following steps (Wodinsky, 1969): recognizing and selecting the prey, drilling a hole in the shell, ejecting a secre - Aristotle was the first to observe octopuses feed on mol - tory substance into the drilled hole, and removing the mollusc luscs (see D’Arcy Thompson, 1910), but it was Fujita who from its shell and eating it.
    [Show full text]